The decision to convert some 737-10s to 737-9s was announced at the same time United announced it was leasing additional A321neos. Most aviation news sites reported it and was also mentioned in posts to these videos. The United first quarter report came out on April 16.
Just how long did you leave up the image of the 3:17 United Boering? You were well into the Boom item. Also You added the fact that United not only removed their MAX (and not the Dash) 10 extremely quickly from the fleet plans BUT the very next day after announcing it their CEO was IN Toulouse talking about the options to get A321NEO’s ASAP regardless of a direct purchase or a lease agreement. As far as Norse what else do they operate apart from the Boering 787-9? Time to go from DJ’s Aviation to DJ’s Boering Spectacular. Faith in Boering is not only Disastrous for them BUT ALSO for Aviation as it causing People to consider their safety and if they do then it’s ‘The Domino Effect’ for Aviation.
You obviously don’t read your subscribers comments. Again you mention a door blow out, when indeed it was and is a door plug. Big difference Mr. Expert!
DJ, why do you ignore the Bus engine issue which has sidelined so many 320 series planes? These directly compete with the Max, and affect UA, AA and many other big carriers...
If an airline dropped the 737 and went with the A320, they would be waiting about 10 years for delivery. If everyone did it the wait time would increase rapidly. That is not going to work. Embraer doesn't make anything that can replace the 737.
AND… everyone laughed and said that Boom would never come to be. Ha! Silly people. I will laugh my head off when I fly Boom from United Airlines to cities in half the normal flight time.
The Boom supersonic aircraft has the same design flaw as the B58 Hustler. An engine out will cause the plane to torque towards the dead engine and loss of flight control. The tail surfaces ARE NOT big enough to overcome an engine out situation.
The XB-1, a single seat flight test aircraft with off-the-shelf engines, is already about seven years behind its initial schedule. Just when one might see a highly complex airliner with engines that are being developed by Boom because those who are experienced in making aero engines refused to get involved is anyone's guess.
@@davidcarter4247 While passengers would greatly appreciate faster transit times, especially on long haul flights, airlines have other, more pressing concerns, namely profitability and effiecency. Airlines wish to maximize their passenger count aka bums in seats per flight while burning as little fuel as possible thus increasing profit per flight. Plus they wish to reduce their carbon footprint/emissions in order to offset any finacial penalties such as carbon taxes. Boom and other SST developers are not going to meet those goals. At best they are just reinventing the Concorde which was a failure due to a number of reasons, having a relatively small passenger capacity along with a massive fuel bill being among them. Didn't help that no one wants sonic booms going off over their towns and cities 24/7. At best, Boom's SST maybe adopted by prestige airlines looking to service a very small but rich clientele the way both British Airways and Air France did with the Concorde, an aircraft that never really made a profit and was at best, a marketing tool.
Many Airlines now quietly admit they don’t want to purchase the Max, but they have “no choice” as Airbus A320 NEO series production is booked for well more than a decade. Thus, to replace the bulk of Max orders, Airbus should now finish the engineering and manufacturing scale-up for the already planned A220-500 & A220-700. It is my understanding the bulk of the engineering for the 500 and 700 series has already been completed when Airbus acquired the CSeries program from Bombardier for $1.00! By the time Airbus is ready to engine the first A220-500 and A200-700 with larger in-house USA made composite wings, P&W should have its backlog of new GTF orders and repairs on older engines well under control. If not, Airbus can use the Leap engines they are already using or the new RR UltraFan, a new GTF that competes directly with P&W GTF.
@@TrentonThomas627 As Airbus is ramping up A320 production, Boeing 737 Max continues to go backwards on all levels. What is the next Max failure? Did Boeing check for and dissipate any harmonic and inharmonic frequencies caused by once again moving the engines even farther forward of the 1960’s design that was engineered for underwing engine placement? Harmonic and inharmonic frequencies can cause metal fatigue cracks leading to catastrophic structural material failures. Was wing box, wings, pylons, attachments, attachment points and fuselage strengthened?
@@TrentonThomas627 The 737 is only selling because no one can buy A320s to get them in less than 5 years (likely 7 or 8). So they go the dumb but only possible option. And fleet commonality and pilot training does help in the choice if they have older 737s.
@TacticaLLR that one Boeing engineer said sections of the fuselage of the 787 Dreamliner are improperly fastened together and could break apart mid-flight 😨
@@makaveli8979 well that’s one *former* quality manager. The actual engineers that work at the plant have refuted his claims and said that they are not true, and that they have done extensive checks to make sure.
Switching to Airbus is a sensible decision, but there is one problem. Airbus has a backlog of approx. 5,000 orders, so even if you walk into the Toulouse headquarters with suitcases filled with cold hard cash, you would be welcomed with coffee and a polite talk, and then be told to move to the back of the line. "Your aircraft will be delivered in 5 years' time."
As Airbus is ramping up A320 production, the Boeing 737 Max continues to go backwards on all levels. What is the next Max failure? Did Boeing check for and dissipate any harmonic and inharmonic frequencies caused by once again moving the engines even farther forward of the wing on the 1960’s design that was engineered for underwing engine placement? Harmonic and inharmonic frequencies can cause metal fatigue cracks leading to catastrophic structural material failures. Was wing box, wings, pylons, attachments, attachment points and fuselage strengthened?
Never thought Boom would get this far. Looks more promising.
This is what i wait for everyday after school! Love it bro
Same
any one else think the Boom Overture looks a hell lot like the old Convair B-58 Hustler?
The decision to convert some 737-10s to 737-9s was announced at the same time United announced it was leasing additional A321neos. Most aviation news sites reported it and was also mentioned in posts to these videos. The United first quarter report came out on April 16.
What is the thumbnail picture? I really like it; Please tell me how to get it.
Thanks :) ^_^
Don't tease us like that DJ, what's the deal with the thumbnail pic? is it even real?
So Boom have solved the sonic boom issue that haunted concorde? If so how?
Just how long did you leave up the image of the 3:17 United Boering? You were well into the Boom item. Also You added the fact that United not only removed their MAX (and not the Dash) 10 extremely quickly from the fleet plans BUT the very next day after announcing it their CEO was IN Toulouse talking about the options to get A321NEO’s ASAP regardless of a direct purchase or a lease agreement.
As far as Norse what else do they operate apart from the Boering 787-9?
Time to go from DJ’s Aviation to DJ’s Boering Spectacular. Faith in Boering is not only Disastrous for them BUT ALSO for Aviation as it causing People to consider their safety and if they do then it’s ‘The Domino Effect’ for Aviation.
👍Good Report👍👌👏🙏Thanks🙏🙏🙏
You should talk about the upcoming Turkish Airlines route from Istanbul to Turin (it will start in July)
Do Boom already have an engine for the Overture?
BOOM-yeah!
Thanks dj!!
You obviously don’t read your subscribers comments. Again you mention a door blow out, when indeed it was and is a door plug. Big difference Mr. Expert!
*Panel Gaps on the Dreamliner 787*
*Were Paper-Thin, and that was Corrected*
United airlines should come to the uk more to do flights to Manchester and Birmingham
Maybe when they get their A321XLR’s
@@tomstravels520 probably
DJ, why do you ignore the Bus engine issue which has sidelined so many 320 series planes? These directly compete with the Max, and affect UA, AA and many other big carriers...
Because that’s a PW problem which has been mentioned before and no further news about it. Also AA use CFM engines for their A321Neo’s
Yay for Boon
Can u pls do airlink
✈️
Will the 737 MAX 10 be Certificated and Enter into Service in 2027 or what? And what about the 737 MAX 7?
hopefully next year if all things go well
Hi as always great video! But can you add time steps please
Drop all Boeing orders , airbus and Embraer, maybe ATR can fill orders
that will never happen
Great idea
@@wadehiggins1114 says you
If an airline dropped the 737 and went with the A320, they would be waiting about 10 years for delivery. If everyone did it the wait time would increase rapidly. That is not going to work. Embraer doesn't make anything that can replace the 737.
They are bonded by contract, they can’t cancel the orders.
What about the engine problems from P&W that caused many 320/321’s to be grounded?
The leased United A321’s will have CFM engines
@@tomstravels520 Cool
Boeing and other greedy companies should learn from this! Putting profits first, makes you fall to last place!
AND… everyone laughed and said that Boom would never come to be. Ha! Silly people. I will laugh my head off when I fly Boom from United Airlines to cities in half the normal flight time.
How much money do you have if you can fly business class all the time?
Boom will go Boom
and then you can catch a Hyperloop to continue on to your destination.......both have about as much chance of occuring as a snowball in hell.
@@ronparrish6666 boom as in nose diving into the ground at great spee?
I still don't see how you are going to get around generating a sonic boom when breaking the sound barrier unless you can magically turn off physics.
The Boom supersonic aircraft has the same design flaw as the B58 Hustler. An engine out will cause the plane to torque towards the dead engine and loss of flight control. The tail surfaces ARE NOT big enough to overcome an engine out situation.
That was what I was sort of thinking.....it shares too many design element of the Hustler and more than likely shares more than a few of its problems.
The XB-1, a single seat flight test aircraft with off-the-shelf engines, is already about seven years behind its initial schedule. Just when one might see a highly complex airliner with engines that are being developed by Boom because those who are experienced in making aero engines refused to get involved is anyone's guess.
@@davidcarter4247 While passengers would greatly appreciate faster transit times, especially on long haul flights, airlines have other, more pressing concerns, namely profitability and effiecency.
Airlines wish to maximize their passenger count aka bums in seats per flight while burning as little fuel as possible thus increasing profit per flight.
Plus they wish to reduce their carbon footprint/emissions in order to offset any finacial penalties such as carbon taxes.
Boom and other SST developers are not going to meet those goals. At best they are just reinventing the Concorde which was a failure due to a number of reasons, having a relatively small passenger capacity along with a massive fuel bill being among them.
Didn't help that no one wants sonic booms going off over their towns and cities 24/7.
At best, Boom's SST maybe adopted by prestige airlines looking to service a very small but rich clientele the way both British Airways and Air France did with the Concorde, an aircraft that never really made a profit and was at best, a marketing tool.
The MAX 9 is kind of a dog the 10 won't be better or even have close to the performance of the 321NEO dont bet on the MAX 10
Definitely that country’s government doesn’t love to theirs people!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Many Airlines now quietly admit they don’t want to purchase the Max, but they have “no choice” as Airbus A320 NEO series production is booked for well more than a decade.
Thus, to replace the bulk of Max orders, Airbus should now finish the engineering and manufacturing scale-up for the already planned A220-500 & A220-700.
It is my understanding the bulk of the engineering for the 500 and 700 series has already been completed when Airbus acquired the CSeries program from Bombardier for $1.00!
By the time Airbus is ready to engine the first A220-500 and A200-700 with larger in-house USA made composite wings, P&W should have its backlog of new GTF orders and repairs on older engines well under control.
If not, Airbus can use the Leap engines they are already using or the new RR UltraFan, a new GTF that competes directly with P&W GTF.
Thing about it is that the 737 max 8 is currently outselling the a320neo. Most airlines had the 737 in their fleet before ordering
@@TrentonThomas627 As Airbus is ramping up A320 production, Boeing 737 Max continues to go backwards on all levels.
What is the next Max failure?
Did Boeing check for and dissipate any harmonic and inharmonic frequencies caused by once again moving the engines even farther forward of the 1960’s design that was engineered for underwing engine placement?
Harmonic and inharmonic frequencies can cause metal fatigue cracks leading to catastrophic structural material failures.
Was wing box, wings, pylons, attachments, attachment points and fuselage strengthened?
@@TrentonThomas627 The 737 is only selling because no one can buy A320s to get them in less than 5 years (likely 7 or 8). So they go the dumb but only possible option.
And fleet commonality and pilot training does help in the choice if they have older 737s.
Wait somebody's ordering Boeing
Why are airlines still ordering the MAX? 😒
United will have to change their orders from 737 to camel!!
When i hear 787 i get scared
Why?
@TacticaLLR that one Boeing engineer said sections of the fuselage of the 787 Dreamliner are improperly fastened together and could break apart mid-flight 😨
@@makaveli8979 well that’s one *former* quality manager. The actual engineers that work at the plant have refuted his claims and said that they are not true, and that they have done extensive checks to make sure.
I am scared that the wistlebower will be self-inflicted again...😅😂😅
6th one to comment!!
Switching to Airbus is a sensible decision, but there is one problem. Airbus has a backlog of approx. 5,000 orders, so even if you walk into the Toulouse headquarters with suitcases filled with cold hard cash, you would be welcomed with coffee and a polite talk, and then be told to move to the back of the line. "Your aircraft will be delivered in 5 years' time."
As Airbus is ramping up A320 production, the Boeing 737 Max continues to go backwards on all levels.
What is the next Max failure?
Did Boeing check for and dissipate any harmonic and inharmonic frequencies caused by once again moving the engines even farther forward of the wing on the 1960’s design that was engineered for underwing engine placement?
Harmonic and inharmonic frequencies can cause metal fatigue cracks leading to catastrophic structural material failures.
Was wing box, wings, pylons, attachments, attachment points and fuselage strengthened?
A lot of goobalygock
Totally agree with you