How to Solve a Challenging Quartic with a Parameter

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 жов 2023
  • 🤩 Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (aplusbi)
    Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! 🧡🥰🎉🥳🧡
    / @sybermathshorts
    / @aplusbi
    ⭐ Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
    My merch → teespring.com/stores/sybermat...
    Follow me → / sybermath
    Subscribe → ua-cam.com/users/SyberMath?sub...
    ⭐ Suggest → forms.gle/A5bGhTyZqYw937W58
    If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
    intent/tweet?text...
    #polynomials #polynomialequations #algebra #nonstandardproblems
    via @UA-cam @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
    An Exponential Equation | 2^{3^{5^x}} = 3^{2^{5^x}}: • An Exponential Equatio...
    A Surprising Exponential Equation: • A Surprising Exponenti...
    PLAYLISTS 🎵 :
    Number Theory Problems: • Number Theory Problems
    Challenging Math Problems: • Challenging Math Problems
    Trigonometry Problems: • Trigonometry Problems
    Diophantine Equations and Systems: • Diophantine Equations ...
    Calculus: • Calculus

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @mcwulf25
    @mcwulf25 9 місяців тому +3

    The second method is far more elegant. When delta is a perfect square, it shouts that there's a simpler method! Nicely explained 😊

  • @pyrite2060
    @pyrite2060 9 місяців тому +3

    Rewrite as a quadratic in a.
    Discriminant simplifies to (2x+1)^2, hence,
    2x+1>=0
    x >= -1/2 and x

  • @dmtri1974
    @dmtri1974 9 місяців тому

    I loved your 1st method!!😄😄😄 a bit out of the box!! Keep doing this.

  • @levskomorovsky1762
    @levskomorovsky1762 8 місяців тому

    I solved the equation myself in the first way and was pleased that the root of (2x +1)^2 turned out beautifully, but it turned out that the second method is even more beautiful!

  • @matthewfeig5624
    @matthewfeig5624 9 місяців тому

    Subtract x^2 from each side. Then factor the left hand side using the difference of two squares.
    (x^2-a)^2 - x^2 = a+x-x^2 ---> (x^2-a+x)(x^2-a-x) = -1*(x^2-a-x)
    The same factor x^2-a-x appears on both sides. So we have factored the quartic into two quadratics.
    (x^2-a+x)(x^2-a-x) + (x^2-a-x) = 0 ---> (x^2-a+x+1)(x^2-a-x) = 0

  • @yoav613
    @yoav613 9 місяців тому +2

    Nice and easy,if you want to solve for x just solve for a😃

  • @NadiehFan
    @NadiehFan 9 місяців тому +1

    Very nice, especially the second method. I solved this using a more traditional approach, the method of undetermined coefficients to factor a quartic. Expanding the given equation we have
    x⁴ − 2ax² − x + (a² − a) = 0
    There is no term with x³, so if this is to factor into two quadratics we must have
    (x² + px + q₁)(x² − px + q₂) = 0
    for some p, q₁, q₂. Expanding this we have
    x⁴ + (q₁ + q₂ − p²)x² + p(q₂ − q₁)x + q₁q₂ = 0
    and equating corresponding coefficients we have
    q₁ + q₂ − p² = −2a
    p(q₂ − q₁) = −1
    q₁q₂ = a(a − 1)
    From p(q₂ − q₁) = −1 we may already suspect that we have either p = 1 and q₂ − q₁ = −1 or p = −1 and q₂ − q₁ = 1 and then it is not hard to find the solution triple (p, q₁, q₂) = (1, −(a − 1), −a) as well as (p, q₁, q₂) = (−1, −a, −(a − 1)) because inverting the sign of p will simply swap the values of q₁ and q₂ for the same factorization. With (p, q₁, q₂) = (1, −(a − 1), −a) we have
    (x² + x − a + 1)(x² − x − a) = 0
    so
    x² + x − a + 1 = 0 ∨ x² − x − a = 0
    and then it is just a matter of solving these two quadratic equations in x using the quadratic formula.

    • @bobbyheffley4955
      @bobbyheffley4955 9 місяців тому

      If a=1, one of the solutions of the right-hand equation is the golden ratio.

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  9 місяців тому

      Wow!

  • @giuseppemalaguti435
    @giuseppemalaguti435 9 місяців тому +1

    Posto y=a-x^2....risultano soluzioni per x+y=0....y-x=1....1)x+a-x^2=0....2)a-x^2-x=1

  • @Annihilator-01
    @Annihilator-01 9 місяців тому +1

    Keep working my friend

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  9 місяців тому

      Thank you, I will

  • @ilanbar1970
    @ilanbar1970 9 місяців тому

    I wonder if there is elegant way to graph parametric equations .. maybe some 3d view in this case

  • @nikos4677
    @nikos4677 9 місяців тому

    i did the second one with different substitution

  • @GirishManjunathMusic
    @GirishManjunathMusic 4 місяці тому

    I worked this out before watching the video:
    (a - x²)² = a + x
    setting a - x² = y → x² = a - y:
    y² = a + x
    x² - y² = - (y + x)
    x² - x² + x + y = 0
    (x + y)(x - y) + (x + y) = 0
    (x + y)(x - y + 1) = 0
    Case 1 : x + y = 0:
    x + a - x² = 0
    x² - x - a = 0
    x = ½ ± √(¼ + a)
    x = ½ ± √(a + ¼)
    Case 2: x - y + 1 = 0
    x - a + x² + 1 = 0
    x² + x - a + 1 = 0
    x = -½ ± √(¼ + a - 1)
    x = -½ ± √(a - ¾).

  • @broytingaravsol
    @broytingaravsol 9 місяців тому +1

    so easy