Solving A Rational Equation in Three Ways

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • 🤩 Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (aplusbi)
    Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! 🧡🥰🎉🥳🧡
    / @sybermathshorts
    / @aplusbi
    ⭐ Join this channel to get access to perks:→ bit.ly/3cBgfR1
    My merch → teespring.com/...
    Follow me → / sybermath
    Subscribe → www.youtube.co...
    ⭐ Suggest → forms.gle/A5bG...
    If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
    in...
    #polynomials #RationalEquations #algebra
    via @UA-cam @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva
    An Exponential Equation | 2^{3^{5^x}} = 3^{2^{5^x}}: • An Exponential Equatio...
    A Surprising Exponential Equation: • A Surprising Exponenti...
    PLAYLISTS 🎵 :
    Number Theory Problems: • Number Theory Problems
    Challenging Math Problems: • Challenging Math Problems
    Trigonometry Problems: • Trigonometry Problems
    Diophantine Equations and Systems: • Diophantine Equations ...
    Calculus: • Calculus

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @NadiehFan
    @NadiehFan 10 місяців тому +4

    If we start by multiplying both sides by (x + 2)² to get rid of the fraction we can proceed as follows:
    x²(x + 2)² + 4x² = 5(x + 2)²
    x²(x² + 4x + 4) + 4x² = 5(x + 2)²
    x²(x² + 4x + 8) = 5(x + 2)²
    (x² + 2x + 4 − 2(x + 2))(x² + 2x + 4 + 2(x + 2)) = 5(x + 2)²
    (x² + 2x + 4)² − 4(x + 2)² = 5(x + 1)²
    (x² + 2x + 4)² − 9(x + 2)² = 0
    (x² + 2x + 4 − 3(x + 2))(x² + 2x + 4 + 3(x + 2)) = 0
    (x² − x − 2)(x² + 5x + 10) = 0
    x² − x − 2 = 0 ∨ x² + 5x + 10 = 0
    Now we only need to solve these two quadratic equations using the quadratic formula to obtain all four roots of the original equation.
    Note that these two quadratic equations are exactly the quadratic equations obtained in the video, but (1) we did not have to deal with fractions, (2) we did not have to use completion of the square and (3) we did not have to use a substitution.
    All that was needed was the difference of two squares identity, first to convert the product x²(x² + 4x + 8) at the left hand side into a difference of two squares (x² + 2x + 4)² − 4(x + 2)², and then, after reducing the right hand side to zero, once again to factor the left hand side (x² + 2x + 4)² − 9(x + 2)² into two quadratics.
    You can turn any product of two quantities into a difference of two squares by taking their average and rewriting the quantities as their average plus and minus half their difference. Here we had the product of x² and x² + 4x + 8. Their average is x² + 2x + 4 and their difference is 4x + 8 = 4(x + 2) so we have x² = (x² + 2x + 4) − 2(x + 2) and x² + 4x + 8 = (x² + 2x + 4) + 2(x + 2). Using the difference of two squares identity (a − b)(a + b) = a² − b² we can therefore rewrite the product x²(x² + 4x + 8) as (x² + 2x + 4)² − 4(x + 2)².

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  10 місяців тому

      You are amazing! 🤩

    • @pdarmagn
      @pdarmagn 10 місяців тому

      That's brilliant 😊

  • @misterdubity3073
    @misterdubity3073 10 місяців тому

    Seeing (x) and (x+2) I converted these to (y-1) and (y+1); modified method 1 led to:
    y(y^3 - 3y - 18) = 0; y = 0 and y = 3 are solutions --> x values {-1, 2}

  • @theearth.8880
    @theearth.8880 10 місяців тому +1

    Wow! Beautiful, sir!

    • @SyberMath
      @SyberMath  10 місяців тому

      Glad you like it!

  • @roger7341
    @roger7341 10 місяців тому

    Brute force
    x^2(x^2 + 4x + 4) + 4x^2 - 5(x^2 + 4x + 4) = 0
    x^4 + 4x^3 + 3x^2 - 20x - 20 = 0
    By inspection x = -1 and synthetic division by (x + 1)
    x^3 + 3x^2 - 20 = 0
    By inspection x = 2 and synthetic division by (x - 2)
    x^2 + 5x + 10 = 0
    Quadratic solution x = (-5 ± i√15)/2

  • @MarcelCox1
    @MarcelCox1 10 місяців тому +1

    Method 1 actually isn't that hard in this case. By testing the (smaller) factors of 20, you will quickly find that -1 and 2 are solutions and you can reduce the equation to a second degree equation which then gives you the 2 complex solutions. Not as elegant than solution 2, but still not so nasty as expected and easier to find because you just use standard polinomial equation reduction techniques.

  • @scottleung9587
    @scottleung9587 10 місяців тому

    I expanded, then used RRT with long division.

  • @pramodbind9031
    @pramodbind9031 10 місяців тому

    Nice

  • @sendai-shimin
    @sendai-shimin 10 місяців тому

    I solved by 2nd method.

  • @rakenzarnsworld2
    @rakenzarnsworld2 10 місяців тому

    x = 2 or -1

  • @-basicmaths862
    @-basicmaths862 10 місяців тому

    x isn't equal to zero So devide. byx^2 & substitute x+1=t solving We get x={-1,2}

  • @chandrikabiswas5829
    @chandrikabiswas5829 10 місяців тому +2

    X=2, x=-1, others are imaginary solution

  • @giuseppemalaguti435
    @giuseppemalaguti435 10 місяців тому

    Old