I seen with my own two eyes a 1969 boss 429 fake sell for 220 thousand dollars. Now it was very nice very well restored car...but it was a 220 thousand dollar fake. If that were a real boss 429. Welllllll the sky is the limit. Them people who have oil money in the middle east will spend big money for cars like that. If your friends car was a true Boss 429...with the title saying so with numbers matching and he sold it for 105 thousand...then he sold out waaaaaaay to cheap. Of course everybody claims to have a real one there were only about 1600 ever made. Soooooo
@@setharnold3699 very true , what I meant is I just don't think it gets the respect it should , for people like us its the holy grail , lot of history behind those cars, dare I say possibly even more than any of the 500's .
Steve Hall yeah guess your right in that aspect. Chevy and Dodge fan boys talk a tough but know that the BOSS is the pinnacle of the muscle cars. I wish I’d have a chance to ride in one with the more aggressive cam and large carburetor like the set up used in nascar in the late 60’s. My life would be complete.
Those are the ONLY 2 good ones in the entire existence of Mustangs, 67-68 GT500 and 69-70 Boss 429. That’s it. 71 to now has just been an ongoing production of ugly ass trash.
I must say I would love to own either one of these cars one day but a 1970 boss 429 is my all time dream car. After me and my dad restoring his 70 Mach 1 I’ve always have been a huge mustang fan. Just a huge bummer he let it go last year. I guess it just means I’m going to have to find me a boss 9 one day and work on it with my sons.
Typically the Boss 429 was more suited to the NASCAR tracks, rather than the 1/4 mile strip. I'll never forget the sound of David Pearson's #21 Wood Brothers Mercury 429. He dominated that MI. race in '76! Those Boss 429 engines had a distinct sound all there own!
I don't understand why they didn't put the 429 boss engine in the Torino,they keep saying it was for NASCAR but i sure never saw a Mustang on a NASCAR track. They really had to to do some re-engineering to get that in a Mustang
@@scottmickelson363 Ford decided the Boss 429 would sell better as a unique Mustang than put the Boss 429 into a Torino. BTW, Ford factory didn't build the Boss 429 Mustangs. Aftermarket company, Kar Kraft, built them using bare shell factory Mustangs.
HP is HP, Boss 429 is suited to whatever contest of HP you want it to compete it in. It’s a closed chamber, opposed valve monster of an engine with more inherent potential than then OE 426 Hemi. The Boss 9 for a bad “drag strip” stigma because Ford handicapped the street motors with intake, cam and carb selection. The Boss 9 is a great drag motor
There's a framed 24x20 print of a red 1969 Boss 429 on my office wall right above my desk. I look at it everyday and it transports my 73 year old mind back to the days of the muscle cars. The Boss was my dream car back then . . . and has been since. It's unlikely (due to cost) that I will ever own one, but in my mind's eye, I envision myself pulling up to a stop light, the driver side window rolled down, my left arm resting on the door. As I look to my left at the driver beside me admiring the Boss, I smile slightly and say . . . "don't you wish you were me?"😎
Having owned a 68 with a 428 scj, (5400 bucks new) and a 4-speed...I can tell you the Shelby is 400 pounds heavier than a GT. Mine would whip a STOCK boss 429 in the quarter mile. But...if the boss got headers, slicks and a decent sized carb...oh, no, the boss would win. I put those things on mine....the boss still won. They were made to modify. (both).
When I was nineteen, I got a 1970 BOSS 429. Headers, a Holley 850 double pumper to replace the anemic 735 cfm vacuum secondary carb, and disconnecting the rev limiter and distributor vacuum retard REALLY woke my BOSS up. Selling it has been the biggest regret of my life. It was Pastel Blue. Only eighteen Pastel Blue BOSS 429s were made.
@@jameshuseby6290 Wrecked it. Damage was repaired but then later discovered that the engine block had cracked. I was young and didn’t foresee the future that well.
At first i fell in love with the 67 , then when i saw the 69 it became my all time favorite mustang , but the 67 will always be my highschool sweetheart and have a special place in my heart
Roc Bottom... the new GT500 is, sure. but we are talking classic mustangs. the 1971 Boss 351 had the fastest 1/4 mile time of any 60's, 70's, 80's or 90's mustang from the factory.
Two legendary musclecars, to be sure. I personally prefer the Boss-9, but the GT500s (particularly the KR variants) were plenty fast, and also had a bit better handling. This a race that I'd be glad to be the "loser" in!
I owned a cherry blue 1969 Boss 429 in 1972 and later a blue 1967 Shelby GT500. Both cars were a super blast to drive. The Shelby was flashier with the white stripes but the Boss felt like it had a better suspension and a better ride. For you little whiners down below, when I said I owned a cherry blue 429, I meant that it was in great (cherry) condition. You little girls need to get updated in car talk. Now go play with your little cell phones.
As Robert stated on here Boss 429 was not set up for drag racing. But I knew a man I took a 94 Mustang installed the Boss 429 and set it up for drag racing. At the time when he first built it it was the fastest Mustang in the country. The next time I saw him he bumped it up from 850 horsepower to well over a thousand naturally aspirated. And if I remember correctly it went from zero to a hundred in 2.8 seconds. In fact how this came about GM Engineers heard about the car and challenged him and put together the fastest possible car they could and lost. Used to be a video of the race wonder if it's still around?
I'm sorry, but I disagree with you on the power output. I'd have to see the dyno sheets. 850hp naturally aspirated is approximately 2hp/cubic inch, which-MAYBE-is almost unbelievable 😳. BUT, let's say you are correct, and it did make 850hp. But 1,000+NATURALLY ASPIRATED??!!! This would now be 2.33hp/cubic inch!!! Sorry, but I call BS......
@@milojanis4901Ford was making close to 800 horsepower in the 60’s with the Boss 429 100% believable these engines came make way more naturally aspirated
I couldn't tell for sure. Who won? I do know this, the 1969 Mustang Boss 429s were officially rated at 375 horsepower. That was because Ford was afraid that if they listed the TRUE horsepower, insurance companies and the government would not allow Ford to sell the car. The TRUE horsepower, the actual horsepower varied from 525 horsepower to as much as 565 horsepower and maybe even greater.
@@SeyranBMW Wow. I couldn't see the times. Fast cars, Fast. I owned a '71 Challenger R/T back in the early 80's. Was doing 12.3- 12-5's. I was an 18yr old punk. Lol. I thought that was blistering. Not so much...😒
Thanks for posting! This is the way things used to be, Interesting instead of Booooring! Pro Stock these days is as boring as watching paint dry. This is more my speed. Going to attend some Southeast Gasser's Ass. runs this year! They look fun. Wheelies, hard launches. They may be slow but they're spectacular!
Takes these two stock from the sales floor and race them, that's the true measure of have a race between the two. Which one would win with what they originally came with?
With all that excessive weight up front, I don't see it as a balanced Track Machine. It couldn't hold a candle to a new Caddy CT5-V Blackwing on the track. Then again, that car is equipped a 6.2 Supercharged Corvette Z06 V8 with 662 hp, 0-60 mph in 3.4 sec for $125,000; Dealer Pricing $140,000 & they're already sold out.
If you are to make a video of two classic cars in a race, do it with quality and so the ET on the signs are legible or don’t post on UA-cam. All the excitement of the race with no happy ending. Downer
The 428 SCJ was probably a better performer on the street than the Boss 429. In the early 70s a lot of people thought the Boss was a dud. The Boss 429 was race engine that had to be somewhat detuned to be drivable on the streets. Ford didn't make any more than the had to so that their new engine could be used in NASCAR. It was a 1 year run and wasn't ever tweaked for optimal street performance. There is no comparison when it comes to "potential" of the 2 motors. The Boss was far badder. It really kicked ass on the NASCAR track and was probably a better than Chrysler's Hemi on the Super speedways. But on the streets, neither the 428 CJ or Boss 429 could hang with the Street Hemi. The 428's were not as badass as the 427 FE motors. They were nowhere near as radical. It was made to be a street motor and used a hydraulic cam + lifters. I'd liken this drag race between the 428 and 429 to a race between Chrysler's 440 and the Hemi... the 440 was the better street racer, but you'd rather have the Hemi
I'd take a 68 Shelby GT500KR over a 69-70 BOSS 429 because the 428 CJ in the Shelby is a much better engine for everyday street use than the race bred BOSS 429. If I buy a classic muscle car, I plan on driving it pretty often.....not just letting it sit in a garage afraid to put miles on it. That being said.....the BOSS 429 is the baddest Mustang of that era and one of the baddest muscle cars ever made by Ford. Only the Ford R-Code 427 was meaner than the BOSS 429
The Boss 429 was actually built by a subcontractor, who had to rebuild the entire front sub-frame to accommodate the larger engine. So, not a through-design concept, though quite fun in its own right.
Obviously neither of these cars are stock (including OEM tires), but if you go back and look at 1/4 magazine times of the muscle car era, the quickest Ford was the 1971 Mustang Boss 351.
oh look its the only 2 muscle cars I would ever buy, at the same place at the same time, what are the odds? well, maybe id get the 70 charger too, you got me lol. but that's it
The new 302 small block boss is bad mfkr also. And its only 302ci.. sooo much torque in that 302 small block its unreal.. i watched a 2017 boss 302 eat a damn big block camero a few weeks ago at a redlight.. im def impressed by fords new small block 302..100 percent one badd ass motor..
Please don't crash, please don't crash, please don't crash
fred smith bannah
Lol, yeah, that’d be something in the range of a half million dollar #%^* up
Imagine if they crashed with each other. Lol
I seen with my own two eyes a 1969 boss 429 fake sell for 220 thousand dollars. Now it was very nice very well restored car...but it was a 220 thousand dollar fake. If that were a real boss 429. Welllllll the sky is the limit. Them people who have oil money in the middle east will spend big money for cars like that. If your friends car was a true Boss 429...with the title saying so with numbers matching and he sold it for 105 thousand...then he sold out waaaaaaay to cheap. Of course everybody claims to have a real one there were only about 1600 ever made. Soooooo
@@mr.t6712 dang, I saw a 2005 Mustang for 9$ and a 2001 Mustang for 5$
The 500 is a cool car , but the boss is probably the most unappreciated and underrated mustang's ever made , super valuable now also.
Unappreciated? It’s the ALPHA Mustang to nearly every muscle car fan.
@@setharnold3699 very true , what I meant is I just don't think it gets the respect it should , for people like us its the holy grail , lot of history behind those cars, dare I say possibly even more than any of the 500's .
Steve Hall yeah guess your right in that aspect. Chevy and Dodge fan boys talk a tough but know that the BOSS is the pinnacle of the muscle cars.
I wish I’d have a chance to ride in one with the more aggressive cam and large carburetor like the set up used in nascar in the late 60’s.
My life would be complete.
Oh I appreciate it do I ever 🥰
Those are the ONLY 2 good ones in the entire existence of Mustangs, 67-68 GT500 and 69-70 Boss 429. That’s it. 71 to now has just been an ongoing production of ugly ass trash.
Listening to V-8 Mustangs purr will never get old....
You got that right especially the original sound of the 1969 70 BOSS 302s and the 1969 302 Z/28s
I must say I would love to own either one of these cars one day but a 1970 boss 429 is my all time dream car. After me and my dad restoring his 70 Mach 1 I’ve always have been a huge mustang fan. Just a huge bummer he let it go last year. I guess it just means I’m going to have to find me a boss 9 one day and work on it with my sons.
O yeah awesome video. Thanks for sharing!
Typically the Boss 429 was more suited to the NASCAR tracks, rather than the 1/4 mile strip. I'll never forget the sound of David Pearson's #21 Wood Brothers Mercury 429. He dominated that MI. race in '76! Those Boss 429 engines had a distinct sound all there own!
I don't understand why they didn't put the 429 boss engine in the Torino,they keep saying it was for NASCAR but i sure never saw a Mustang on a NASCAR track. They really had to to do some re-engineering to get that in a Mustang
Yes indeed
Robert M. Trolinder, huge difference between NASCAR Boss 429 and the street version Boss 429.
@@scottmickelson363 Ford decided the Boss 429 would sell better as a unique Mustang than put the Boss 429 into a Torino. BTW, Ford factory didn't build the Boss 429 Mustangs. Aftermarket company, Kar Kraft, built them using bare shell factory Mustangs.
HP is HP, Boss 429 is suited to whatever contest of HP you want it to compete it in.
It’s a closed chamber, opposed valve monster of an engine with more inherent potential than then OE 426 Hemi.
The Boss 9 for a bad “drag strip” stigma because Ford handicapped the street motors with intake, cam and carb selection.
The Boss 9 is a great drag motor
There's a framed 24x20 print of a red 1969 Boss 429 on my office wall right above my desk. I look at it everyday and it transports my 73 year old mind back to the days of the muscle cars. The Boss was my dream car back then . . . and has been since. It's unlikely (due to cost) that I will ever own one, but in my mind's eye, I envision myself pulling up to a stop light, the driver side window rolled down, my left arm resting on the door. As I look to my left at the driver beside me admiring the Boss, I smile slightly and say . . . "don't you wish you were me?"😎
The golden age of muscle is RIGHT NOW, before batteries take over
Having owned a 68 with a 428 scj, (5400 bucks new) and a 4-speed...I can tell you the Shelby is 400 pounds heavier than a GT. Mine would whip a STOCK boss 429 in the quarter mile. But...if the boss got headers, slicks and a decent sized carb...oh, no, the boss would win. I put those things on mine....the boss still won. They were made to modify. (both).
@@robertbairt9094 11.391 for Shelby vs 11.429 for Boss
When I was nineteen, I got a 1970 BOSS 429. Headers, a Holley 850 double pumper to replace the anemic 735 cfm vacuum secondary carb, and disconnecting the rev limiter and distributor vacuum retard REALLY woke my BOSS up. Selling it has been the biggest regret of my life. It was Pastel Blue. Only eighteen Pastel Blue BOSS 429s were made.
@@MarlonDeanMcQueen Why did you sell it?
@@jameshuseby6290 Wrecked it. Damage was repaired but then later discovered that the engine block had cracked. I was young and didn’t foresee the future that well.
@@MarlonDeanMcQueen Yes I can definitely relate to that!
Really would’ve been nice to see those two awesome cars go at it. Apparently I need new glasses, everything was out of focus.
At first i fell in love with the 67 , then when i saw the 69 it became my all time favorite mustang , but the 67 will always be my highschool sweetheart and have a special place in my heart
Somehow, I could just feel the 429 was gonna win. Such a bad-ass car...nothing even compares: when it comes to Mustangs, the Boss 429 is king!
427 R code side oiler was a true racing engine and the true king of the blue oval
I think fastest mustang from factory was a 69 coupe with a scj and drag pack. Made I think less than 15 and ran low 11's.
fastest classic mustang from the factory was the 1971 boss 351.
No Thanks Can’t agree with ya there....isn’t that a 2-valve? Anyway, the Shelby GT500 is the fastest production Mustang ever.
Roc Bottom... the new GT500 is, sure. but we are talking classic mustangs. the 1971 Boss 351 had the fastest 1/4 mile time of any 60's, 70's, 80's or 90's mustang from the factory.
Two legendary musclecars, to be sure. I personally prefer the Boss-9, but the GT500s (particularly the KR variants) were plenty fast, and also had a bit better handling.
This a race that I'd be glad to be the "loser" in!
Let’s not forget attractive. Artistic value and cool factor makes it irrelevant how fast it is. I’ll still take these over a fast modern car
It actually happened! Two dream cars drag racing with a legit outcome... so sweet. Where tf was I at 4 years ago.
Which is which?
Who won?
69 is my favorite year...429 Boss, well it's a cherry on top. Rode in one, insane. I have had Mach 1, love them!
Yeah the dual headlights make it ,the 70 seems so plain to me.
El 429 Boss es una bestia! tan incomprendido tanto potencial
Muscle flexing at it's best both of them. Boss 429 just proved why it's a BOSS !
Because it jumped the start cheater
I owned a cherry blue 1969 Boss 429 in 1972 and later a blue 1967 Shelby GT500.
Both cars were a super blast to drive. The Shelby was flashier with the white stripes
but the Boss felt like it had a better suspension and a better ride. For you little whiners down below, when I said I owned a cherry blue 429, I meant that it was in great (cherry) condition. You little girls need to get updated in car talk. Now go play with your little cell phones.
Which one do you think was faster?
What happened to them?
Your full of shit you probably had a pinto and a gremlin cause you still have your mullet!
Ford did NOT have a cherry blue Boss 429 it was grabber blue. I call BS
Tim Yedo he probably got it confused with grabber blue cause cherry is very bright so him saying cherry blue he may be referring to grabber blue
THE BOSS
Legends
As Robert stated on here Boss 429 was not set up for drag racing.
But I knew a man I took a 94 Mustang installed the Boss 429 and set it up for drag racing. At the time when he first built it it was the fastest Mustang in the country. The next time I saw him he bumped it up from 850 horsepower to well over a thousand naturally aspirated. And if I remember correctly it went from zero to a hundred in 2.8 seconds. In fact how this came about GM Engineers heard about the car and challenged him and put together the fastest possible car they could and lost. Used to be a video of the race wonder if it's still around?
I'm sorry, but I disagree with you on the power output. I'd have to see the dyno sheets. 850hp naturally aspirated is approximately 2hp/cubic inch, which-MAYBE-is almost unbelievable 😳. BUT, let's say you are correct, and it did make 850hp. But 1,000+NATURALLY ASPIRATED??!!! This would now be 2.33hp/cubic inch!!! Sorry, but I call BS......
@@milojanis4901 check out Jon Kasse racing engines
@@milojanis4901Ford was making close to 800 horsepower in the 60’s with the Boss 429 100% believable these engines came make way more naturally aspirated
Keeping both those beasts straight is a handful.
About the same view I saw of a GT500 back in the day when I raced one. Tail lights!
Be nice to see the times.
The ONLY 2 mustangs attractive enough for my approval
I couldn't tell for sure. Who won? I do know this, the 1969 Mustang Boss 429s were officially rated at 375 horsepower. That was because Ford was afraid that if they listed the TRUE horsepower, insurance companies and the government would not allow Ford to sell the car. The TRUE horsepower, the actual horsepower varied from 525 horsepower to as much as 565 horsepower and maybe even greater.
Yes sir ,you're totally right.
The BOSS won
By the way thank you for this video My Heart actually skipped a beat these cars are so beautiful 🇺🇸😊
Can someone explain to me the difference between Boss 302/351/429 & Mach 1? Thanks
What was the times? Everything went blurry
@@SeyranBMW both cars must have had a little bit of work done to em. They weren’t quite that fast right from the factory.
@@lewisshepard9239 Most probably. I pulled the numbers out of my ass but I know they need a lot of work to run 11's.
@@SeyranBMW Oh,Ok. I know I didn’t hear it. lol
@@SeyranBMW Wow. I couldn't see the times. Fast cars, Fast. I owned a '71 Challenger R/T back in the early 80's. Was doing 12.3- 12-5's. I was an 18yr old punk. Lol. I thought that was blistering. Not so much...😒
@@johnmcaleese8459 pretty darn quick
Never been a mustang fan...but the boss is the boss plan and simple
Never been a fan of american cars in general but these 2, specially the 429, are prob in my top 10 evecr
Thanks for posting! This is the way things used to be, Interesting instead of Booooring! Pro Stock these days is as boring as watching paint dry. This is more my speed. Going to attend some Southeast Gasser's Ass. runs this year! They look fun. Wheelies, hard launches. They may be slow but they're spectacular!
My 2 personal favorite cars
WHAT A PAIR OF COOL FAST CARS! John P.
Loved both since they first came out and still do
That 429 took off. Holy smokes.
They both won. Awesome cars.
Boss my favorite car all the time
Two best looking cars ever. I would not be able to choose.
Takes these two stock from the sales floor and race them, that's the true measure of have a race between the two. Which one would win with what they originally came with?
Agreed 👍
Perfect harmony that is
These cars look absolutely gorgeous
Those Boss 429’s didnt work very well in stock form. Way under-tuned from factory. Cam, intake, bigger carb and some headers were/are necessary
Add excessive weight over front of car. The 429 was heavier than the 428, which resulted in less traction off the line.
Good quality video. Cannot even read the trap times.
gt500 is fantastic,but boss is another level
Come to Daddy 500 won
not really.
Boss 429 was made for NASCAR back in the day. Still a Beauty. 💋 I love GT 500 too. It’s a dream.
With all that excessive weight up front, I don't see it as a balanced Track Machine. It couldn't hold a candle to a new Caddy CT5-V Blackwing on the track. Then again, that car is equipped a 6.2 Supercharged Corvette Z06 V8 with 662 hp, 0-60 mph in 3.4 sec for $125,000; Dealer Pricing $140,000 & they're already sold out.
A friend is mine has a Boss 429. It's an awesome car!! He bought it in 1969
Left lane left early and the tree tells the tale.
Nobody gonna say anything about the fact that Shelby just did a wheelie?
That was cool the whole car was almost momentarily leaving the ground
The Shelby did a wheelie. There.
@@SeyranBMW Isn't that the truth. A wheelie definitely looks cool but won't get you the win !!
Oh man and thanks i need this all my wife talks about is EVs
Thats a family conflict...
Very nice. Who won?
If you are to make a video of two classic cars in a race, do it with quality and so the ET on the signs are legible or don’t post on UA-cam. All the excitement of the race with no happy ending. Downer
T. O. Agreed! g
Which is the best? I love them both
Fuck yea! That made my afternoon.
The 428 SCJ was probably a better performer on the street than the Boss 429. In the early 70s a lot of people thought the Boss was a dud. The Boss 429 was race engine that had to be somewhat detuned to be drivable on the streets. Ford didn't make any more than the had to so that their new engine could be used in NASCAR. It was a 1 year run and wasn't ever tweaked for optimal street performance. There is no comparison when it comes to "potential" of the 2 motors. The Boss was far badder. It really kicked ass on the NASCAR track and was probably a better than Chrysler's Hemi on the Super speedways. But on the streets, neither the 428 CJ or Boss 429 could hang with the Street Hemi.
The 428's were not as badass as the 427 FE motors. They were nowhere near as radical. It was made to be a street motor and used a hydraulic cam + lifters.
I'd liken this drag race between the 428 and 429 to a race between Chrysler's 440 and the Hemi... the 440 was the better street racer, but you'd rather have the Hemi
I agree. Straight out of the box and on the street, the 440 or SCJ is the way to go. If you're going to race it, the Hemi or the Boss shotgun.
I really hoped that the mustang would win.
Boss left the tree early. Automatic lose!
@@SeyranBMW Thats not even close to wat I was talkin bout
Looks like the Boss got there first. Now, you need to add in a 69 428 super Cobra Jet drag pak and we have the best mustangs ever produced.
really awesome video. never scene these 2 car race. can you clear it up? who won?
Watch the video and lights
Looks like someone jumped the gun...look at the tree.
would have been dead even.
Amazing!!!!
Sturgis SD isn't just for bikes anymore!
At least we see who won, but how about the times/mph???
I'd take a 68 Shelby GT500KR over a 69-70 BOSS 429 because the 428 CJ in the Shelby is a much better engine for everyday street use than the race bred BOSS 429. If I buy a classic muscle car, I plan on driving it pretty often.....not just letting it sit in a garage afraid to put miles on it. That being said.....the BOSS 429 is the baddest Mustang of that era and one of the baddest muscle cars ever made by Ford. Only the Ford R-Code 427 was meaner than the BOSS 429
Jeremy Thompson hey may I ask you something should I buy a 70 gt500 or a 70 boss 302 or a 69 camaro z28 rs
69 camaro any day over a 70 mustang. 69 was the best year for both cars
Drop a 427 or 454 in the camaro though
LordZeusCannon so a 69 camaro z28 rs than a 70 gt500 Shelby
@@AlejandroP1980s fuck a piece of shit camaro!!!
Looked like the 69 mustang red lighted on the tree. That's an automatic loss.
One of each, please!
The boss always rules
Hi can somebody please inform me what are the main differences between a GT500 and a Boss 429 thanks
Besides the entire body, interior, and completely different engine designs... same exact cars.
@@oldtimerf7602 which one was more powerful stock?
The Boss 429 was actually built by a subcontractor, who had to rebuild the entire front sub-frame to accommodate the larger engine. So, not a through-design concept, though quite fun in its own right.
OMG, AWESOME! Two of my top five favorite 70s Mustangs!
Who is won?
The 428 is a beast but the 429 is king beast.
I don't wanna see my mom and dad fighting, I'm too young and sensitive.
The 69 Boss 429 needs a bigger carburetor and a fatter cam. Then it would be get the women kids and Chevy's off the streets.
Who won?
Nice cars but who won, blurry camera guy?
Best focus ever
Obviously neither of these cars are stock (including OEM tires), but if you go back and look at 1/4 magazine times of the muscle car era, the quickest Ford was the 1971 Mustang Boss 351.
So who won the race?
Which one was faster?
Watch the video!!
That is a nice potato that you filmed that race with. For god's sake, use the focus so that we can see the results!
This is ultra blur gay quality :D
Boss 9 red lighted. I think they would've been pretty even....
Exactly my thought
😂 slow vs slow I fell asleep waiting on the finish!
Who is win?
who's the girl in the middle covering her ears lol🤣🤣🤣💀
Both winners to me!
Cant see who won!
69 mustang 429 for the win, i was going for the 429 cuz i have a model one
Duro
I don't think either of these are stock. That 500 lifted the front wheels.
If you can’t have clarity in the video to be able to read the trap speed, just don’t make a video.
I agree
Both cars are winners.
No one would know what the pos gt500 is if gone in 60 seconds never came around.
AMO LOS DOS MUSTANG PERO EL BOSS CE PASO CAPOO
oh look its the only 2 muscle cars I would ever buy, at the same place at the same time, what are the odds? well, maybe id get the 70 charger too, you got me lol. but that's it
I kick myself daily for selling my 460 powered 69. Most beautiful of all Mustangs.
So who won?
It's called Boss for a reason 😌
The new 302 small block boss is bad mfkr also. And its only 302ci.. sooo much torque in that 302 small block its unreal.. i watched a 2017 boss 302 eat a damn big block camero a few weeks ago at a redlight.. im def impressed by fords new small block 302..100 percent one badd ass motor..
Yes I’ll take both please
Sweeeeeet cars
Looked like the Shelby jumped the bump.
👏😎💪