David Deutsch | On Beauty, Knowledge, and Progress

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 чер 2024
  • Program & apply to join: foresight.org/existential-hope/
    Foresight Existential Hope Group
    Xhope Special with David Deutsch
    David Deutsch is a British physicist at the University of Oxford. He is a Visiting Professor in the Department of Atomic and Laser Physics at the Centre for Quantum Computation (CQC) in the Clarendon Laboratory of the University of Oxford. He pioneered the field of quantum computation by formulating a description for a quantum Turing machine, as well as specifying an algorithm designed to run on a quantum computer. He has also proposed the use of entangled states and Bell's theorem for quantum key distribution and is a proponent of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.
    Discover the full transcript and list of resources here: www.existentialhope.com/podca...
    Join us:
    ► Twitter: / foresightinst
    ► Facebook: / foresightinst
    ► Instagram: / existentialhope
    ► LinkedIn: / foresight-institute
    ► Or visit: foresight.org/
    If you enjoy what we do please support us via Patreon: / foresightinstitute .
    If you’re interested in joining these meetings consider donating through our donation page: foresight.org/donate/
    Foresight Institute advances technologies for the long-term future of life, focusing on molecular machine nanotechnology, biotechnology, and computer science.
    Subscribe for videos concerning our programs on Molecular Machines, Biotechnology & Health Extension, Intelligent Cooperation, Neurotech, Space, and Existential Hope.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @BrentNally
    @BrentNally Рік тому +29

    David Deutsch is one of my heroes! What an incredible video! Thanks!

    • @udaypsaroj
      @udaypsaroj Рік тому +1

      Oh, so you're here too! Nice revisiting :)

  • @MatteoAgnelli
    @MatteoAgnelli Місяць тому +2

    David is a treasure for humanity.

  • @nandorpinter
    @nandorpinter Рік тому +28

    Wow, a lot of new David Deutsch content lately. Very, very good.

  • @vladimirmilosevic7614
    @vladimirmilosevic7614 Рік тому +10

    For those looking to read the Popper's essay referred in last question. It can be found as introductory chapter in Popper's book Conjectures and Refutations.

    • @GilesMcRiker
      @GilesMcRiker Рік тому

      What would you say is the best gateway book to Popper for the uninitiated?

    • @vladimirmilosevic7614
      @vladimirmilosevic7614 Рік тому

      @@GilesMcRiker Maybe Unended Quest is lighter, which he wrote in his later years. Conjectures and Refutations is great entry too it well structures his theory in its mature stage. But there are key essays elsewhere e.g. Myth of the Framework etc. Deutsch added to Popper although he is too modest to admit, so if you haven't read Beginning of Infinity that is the best and easiest start by far.

  • @danielnofal
    @danielnofal 11 місяців тому +1

    It is so valuable to have more David Deutsch content! Well done

  • @godynnel7680
    @godynnel7680 Рік тому +12

    Always a joy to listen to David!

  • @Jeditrades
    @Jeditrades Рік тому +3

    The essay “On the Sources of Knowledge and of Ignorance” is in the Introduction to Karl Popper’s book Conjectures & Refutations. ; )

  • @christianhawking4085
    @christianhawking4085 Рік тому +2

    Awesome video! Thanks for sharing!

  • @Ovvenchips
    @Ovvenchips Рік тому +1

    Thanks for this

  • @DrMehmetAkifSimsek
    @DrMehmetAkifSimsek Рік тому +1

    Evoking wisdom 🙏👋

  • @pdc7482
    @pdc7482 Рік тому

    Outstanding !

  • @11tanzim
    @11tanzim 11 місяців тому

    Would be interested in setting up a London branch of foresight institute. Can see this having a beneficial role in supporting the ecosystem around existential hope across academia, industry, investors and government

  • @reedjohnny4635
    @reedjohnny4635 Рік тому +4

    Please add timestamps.

  • @swenic
    @swenic Рік тому +2

    No link to Poppers lecture or Brett Halls five videos?

    • @ForesightInstitute
      @ForesightInstitute  Рік тому +1

      full list of resouces and transcript here: www.existentialhope.com/podcasts/david-deutsch-on-beauty-knowledge-and-progress

    • @swenic
      @swenic Рік тому

      Thank you

  • @hn6187
    @hn6187 Рік тому +1

    Did anyone find the popper lecture he mentioned ( "'on the sources of knowledge and ignorance' ...i think"). Here's the brett hall take: ua-cam.com/play/PLsE51P_yPQCRCYW5QXBRjWSidM5na1I4x.html

  • @hn6187
    @hn6187 Рік тому

    He has to be one of the most liberal and creative scientists on the planet. But I find it confusing that he talks about right / wrong and error correction so much. Surely it's multiverse, consciousness in Consciousnesses. I'd like to ask him about the ( Hoffman sense) cosmological polytope, the extent to which ( space-time) math is a function of our vision system ( mostly ) and there's an infinity of new math to discover when we make entirely new computation 'consciousnesses'.

  • @EmperorsNewWardrobe
    @EmperorsNewWardrobe Рік тому +1

    45:22 “there’s no law of physics that says we can’t solve them, therefore we can solve them”
    Hm, I don’t think that conclusion follows. Surely for something to not be proven impossible doesn’t necessarily make it possible

    • @patrickburke7693
      @patrickburke7693 Рік тому

      It is possible given the right knowledge

    • @EmperorsNewWardrobe
      @EmperorsNewWardrobe Рік тому

      @@patrickburke7693 you added a condition in your sentence. David’s point is that what’s not shown to be impossible is therefore possible, which I’m claiming is a non sequitur. Something needs to be demonstrated as possible to be possible

    • @markmnelson
      @markmnelson Рік тому

      @@EmperorsNewWardrobe that seems like a strange condition to me. There are a very large number of things that are possible that have never been demonstrated to be possible. Just as there have been a very large number of things that turned out to be technologically possible in the last 100 years, that had never before been demonstrated to be possible in the previous 13.8 billion years prior. Am I missing something?

    • @patrickburke7693
      @patrickburke7693 Рік тому

      You've trapt yourself in a self-defeating train of thought

    • @EmperorsNewWardrobe
      @EmperorsNewWardrobe Рік тому

      @@markmnelson can you give me one example of what is possible without demonstration that it's possible? I wonder if you're mixing up demonstration with verification

  • @colinwright5157
    @colinwright5157 Рік тому

    The physics community seriously need to come back in to the real world and get out of the surreal Alice in wonderland , dream theories.

  • @hn6187
    @hn6187 Рік тому

    "our society is good at not letting dangerous people into power" ... So what was Brexit? I love Deutsch but he is naive about how awful people can be and how fragile our institutions are.

  • @User47598
    @User47598 7 місяців тому

    Allison, please speak slowly. It would make you more understandable to non English speakers but more elegant as well.

    • @tristanludowyk9579
      @tristanludowyk9579 2 місяці тому

      Why does she need to be elegant? Would you say that to a man?

  • @colincrisp1592
    @colincrisp1592 Рік тому

    Not a word about the banksters. Who want you gone. Hope you didn't get the jab