Building a Universal Constructor: a Conversation with David Deutsch

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лют 2024
  • Could we build a machine that can carry out any task? The meta-framework "Constructor Theory" suggests we might be able to make such a universal constructor. David Deutsch discusses the implications of such a machine for physics, for the economy, and for humans. Deutsch also talks about problems in funding for fundamental physics, with reporter Logan Chipkin.
    Other interviews in this series:
    1) Constructor Theory and Irreversibility, with Chiara Marletto and Vlatko Vedral: • Constructor Theory and...
    2) Time's Arrow, with Paul Davies: • Time's Arrow, Black Ho...
    3) Testing Time, with Fabrizio Piacentini and Laura Knoll: • Testing Time on the FQ...
    For more information, visit qspace.fqxi.org/podcasts
    #physics #computerscience #science #constructortheory #daviddeutsch
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @El_Diablo_12
    @El_Diablo_12 3 місяці тому +1

    8:50 what it would mean if a universal constructor wasn’t possible
    16:50 you’ll make money in a post constructor society by creating and encoding knowledge/transformations that people want
    19:45 the smallest possible universal constructor aka the protomolecule from expanse
    21:00 leaving the traditional funding path and sustaining his own research

  • @Thomas-gk42
    @Thomas-gk42 4 місяці тому

    Interesting, and nice introduction by Dr. Zeeya.
    Whould like to know if what DD. says about funding of basic research is related to the UK or he considers that as a global problem. In her book 'Lost in Math', Sabine Hossenfelder mentioned similar problems.

  • @AlgoNudger
    @AlgoNudger 4 місяці тому +1

    Thanks.

  • @NeilEvans-xq8ik
    @NeilEvans-xq8ik 3 місяці тому

    Is the replicator on Star Trek a universal constructor? 🤔🖖

  • @benjamindees
    @benjamindees 2 місяці тому

    It's not the job of physicists to explain why economics is such a clown-show. Stop asking them about it. Start asking economists.