Tennis rackets can be very objective to the player and the technical playing style they play with it. That being said there are many tests, experiments that can be used as a measurement. We just try to give a different perspective as to all the other valid opinions inside the other reviews - to measure more strokes requires more time and videos- keeping it simple was the goal :)
Great approach for a tennis racket test. I think it's really interesting to supplement personal opinion with data. For some people, their personal opinion wasn't reflected in the data and that's why this type of test is so valuable.
I like the objectivity and thoroughness of your tests. Does the Blade or the RF01 have the edge in sweet spot, arm friendliness, and versatility for an all court player? I'm trying to decide between those two sticks.
Just found your channel. LOVE the data led approach! Really appreciate the pairing of subjective feel with objective measures. I use a blade 98 customised to 335g/c.325sw/6pts HL - so looks like RF Pro might be perfect. But more power and spin! Do you think your play-test data supports that? Or not so much? Cheers!
Interesting. Honnestly, I wouldn't worry too much about the 5g supposed difference in weight between the RF Pro and the PS97, given Wilson's infamous quality control. You could easily end up with a RF Pro that's lighter than the PS97. Only way to know for sure is to measure the weight / balance / static weight.
Would be nice to get an overall playability review rather than just looking at raw data (after all, any power racquet will "win" this type of metric contest). I would hope that there are more subtle player benefits to a Roger-guided racquet design!
LOVE the fact that you had 3 different playtesters with different playing styles! 👍👍👍
This is the most proper racket testing I've ever seen. Both data and opinion were usued. Thanks for making this videos!
Best RF review on UA-cam hands down.
Great video. Thanks
Great review with data!
Nice to see you again, haven’t heard anything in long time :)
What a job! Amazing video, thanks 👏
Tennis rackets can be very objective to the player and the technical playing style they play with it. That being said there are many tests, experiments that can be used as a measurement. We just try to give a different perspective as to all the other valid opinions inside the other reviews - to measure more strokes requires more time and videos- keeping it simple was the goal :)
Great approach for a tennis racket test. I think it's really interesting to supplement personal opinion with data. For some people, their personal opinion wasn't reflected in the data and that's why this type of test is so valuable.
This is gold dust, thank you madam 😊
thank you!
Best ever review, you certainly have a knack for teaching, love it :)
Nice! Miss your reviews
Love the comparison with other similar class rackets.
Competitive tennis match is the way to go.
Thank you so much! 🎾🎾
Nice concept can I ask you which tool do you use to record spin etc ?
Nice experiment. What’s the measurement tool for speed and spin in your app?
I like the objectivity and thoroughness of your tests.
Does the Blade or the RF01 have the edge in sweet spot, arm friendliness, and versatility for an all court player? I'm trying to decide between those two sticks.
FrankWorks + RF. Lovely pair.
Just found your channel. LOVE the data led approach! Really appreciate the pairing of subjective feel with objective measures.
I use a blade 98 customised to 335g/c.325sw/6pts HL - so looks like RF Pro might be perfect. But more power and spin! Do you think your play-test data supports that? Or not so much? Cheers!
May I ask what app or program do you use to analyze the data please?
yay i love this go jayden
Was it mentioned which model each player used? Was it the 01, the pro, they last the future?
RF for life 💪🏽💯
Interesting. Honnestly, I wouldn't worry too much about the 5g supposed difference in weight between the RF Pro and the PS97, given Wilson's infamous quality control. You could easily end up with a RF Pro that's lighter than the PS97. Only way to know for sure is to measure the weight / balance / static weight.
Surina, what was your favorite model?
What's the computer 🖥 program being used? Thanks
Would be nice to get an overall playability review rather than just looking at raw data (after all, any power racquet will "win" this type of metric contest). I would hope that there are more subtle player benefits to a Roger-guided racquet design!
Data doesn’t lie. Blade should have the highest swing weight, hence the power edge over the ezone and the RF.
The kid. Turn, move and hit. He does move, turn and hit
Looks like a fantastic racket. But why care about the leather grip? Most/if not all, players use overgrip!!
Data are good but I realy understand why no backhand. Because when we think Federer we think about one backhand and not forhand.
Surina is 👍
I’m not sure how accurate is that computer because that kid’s forehands don’t look like 63 mph. I think Federer’s average forehand was 75 mph
and i wish the test would be done painting the rackets same, so they dont know what......
Reviews is great, racquet design same color and boring. Wish he change it up with some red, white, and gold
to much talking, what did the testers feel