Devil's Toothpaste Rocket Engine (3D Printed)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,8 тис.

  • @integza
    @integza  3 роки тому +409

    Go to NordVPN.com/integza to get a 2-year plan plus 4 additional months with a huge discount!

    • @scienceium5233
      @scienceium5233 3 роки тому +4

      Hello

    • @myname-sj7hs
      @myname-sj7hs 3 роки тому +1

      first

    • @kashy._x
      @kashy._x 3 роки тому +2

      I need a 3d printer cause its too costly for me

    • @olileoli2788
      @olileoli2788 3 роки тому +4

      @@whereitallhappens784 bruh

    • @acometsuranian1325
      @acometsuranian1325 3 роки тому +1

      Integza
      it looks like you really like WW2 stuff, soooo , do you play warthunder?

  • @smartereveryday
    @smartereveryday 3 роки тому +610

    It's beautiful

    • @integza
      @integza  3 роки тому +50

      Yes it is 😁

    • @azibros
      @azibros 3 роки тому +3

      Nobody is here, just us 5 😉

    • @chucknorris4768
      @chucknorris4768 3 роки тому +5

      Make that 4

    • @azibros
      @azibros 3 роки тому +3

      @@chucknorris4768 yessir

    • @damonw7397
      @damonw7397 3 роки тому +4

      Look! It's a man, speaking to another man. :)
      (I am a fan of both... don't tell anyone)

  • @ExplosionsAndFire
    @ExplosionsAndFire 3 роки тому +401

    Very cool mate!! Great to see that porous ceramic catalyst working as well as it did!

    • @integza
      @integza  3 роки тому +39

      Sometimes the weird ideas work ahahah

    • @nackduck9700
      @nackduck9700 3 роки тому +2

      @@integza frfr

    • @markgeorge447
      @markgeorge447 3 роки тому +4

      @@integza I guess it's not that weird it's like the catalyst converters inside cars the way it's made is what is weird

    • @etelmo
      @etelmo 3 роки тому +4

      Correct me if I'm wrong but without a stabiliser like EDTA or citric acid wouldn't the permanganate break down to manganese dioxide over an hour or so anyway? Like that would be the brown colour seen on the ceramic...
      But then again those very same stabilisers generally prevent metal ions reacting to decompose hydrogen peroxide (that's... Kind of their point), so they would probably interfere with and slow down the reaction?
      It's been ages since I did any related chemistry, I'm just here for Tom, that sexy sexy man.

    • @BackYardScience2000
      @BackYardScience2000 2 роки тому +1

      @@etelmo yes, a stabilizer would slow the reaction down. But not to the point that it wouldn't work at all. It all really depends on what the stabilizer is and how much it affects the reaction. Manganese dioxide does work as a catalyst, but it's not as fast acting as the permanganate. So you get diminished performance, but not to an extent to where it's not useful. Also, I'm not sure if you're referring to the permanganate breaking down spontaneously over time, or while in the reaction? Yes, it does break down into the manganese dioxide upon reacting, but no it won't break down while sitting there waiting to react with the peroxide. As long as it doesn't come into contact with a fuel, it'll be fine. Those catalyst ceramic pieces could be soaked and dried and stored for long periods if they are kept in air tight bags. If left out, they may degrade slowly over the course of a few weeks..... Maybe.

  • @JoelCreates
    @JoelCreates 3 роки тому +2245

    Can I use this to quickly apply regular toothpaste to my toothbrush?

    • @ElJitomateElectrico
      @ElJitomateElectrico 3 роки тому +51

      Lol

    • @integza
      @integza  3 роки тому +508

      Your teeth would shine like the sun 🤣

    • @glowytheglowbug
      @glowytheglowbug 3 роки тому +58

      @@integza XD as his gums get burned off

    • @yashpanchal3013
      @yashpanchal3013 3 роки тому +42

      @@integza if they remain in place 😂😂😂

    • @jurevidovic9660
      @jurevidovic9660 3 роки тому +11

      Can you make a steam powered rc car? or fire, like a flame licker engine? Or go for a personal record how far you could get it to go in a straight line

  • @TheConjurersTower
    @TheConjurersTower 3 роки тому +261

    "It might explode or it might work really well."
    Spoken like a true rocket scientist.

    • @Jamesdavey358
      @Jamesdavey358 3 роки тому +5

      True ksp player

    • @themuffincat
      @themuffincat 3 роки тому +2

      Yep true rocket scientist

    • @Attaxalotl
      @Attaxalotl 2 роки тому +6

      First law of rocketry: always assume that it will explode

    • @Juno101
      @Juno101 2 роки тому +5

      It's exploding, but gently.

    • @wesleythomas7125
      @wesleythomas7125 2 роки тому +2

      "This will either work F L A W L E S S L Y
      Or it's gonna kill me."
      -The Martian

  • @Weisz
    @Weisz 3 роки тому +739

    I really didn’t think the devils toothpaste recipe would have been so simple, dang. Super cool video!

    • @almightybush9634
      @almightybush9634 3 роки тому +2

      Yes

    • @integza
      @integza  3 роки тому +44

      Thank you so much Louis 😁

    • @EzzieMoore
      @EzzieMoore 3 роки тому

      @@Peowcatpeow no wonder

    • @abhishekprasad8151
      @abhishekprasad8151 3 роки тому

      e

    • @Teth47
      @Teth47 3 роки тому +9

      There are honestly a worrying number of really nasty reactions that are really easy to do. It's amazing things don't explode more often.

  • @marsgizmo
    @marsgizmo 3 роки тому +268

    Love this project! 😎

    • @integza
      @integza  3 роки тому +21

      Thank you Adrian 😁

    • @lamx9687
      @lamx9687 2 роки тому +1

      Why is integza the only one to reply to this comment

    • @jonahplayscello
      @jonahplayscello 2 роки тому

      Love your videos

  • @carlogargiulo4101
    @carlogargiulo4101 3 роки тому +94

    Video idea: attach something like an afterburner to the back of the nozzle so that you can use the oxygen from the reaction to boost some type of combustion, maybe even add alcohol in the acid to ignite it in the first chamber.

  • @xylafoxlin
    @xylafoxlin 3 роки тому +101

    This is WAY TOO FUN

  • @jtwarner13
    @jtwarner13 3 роки тому +156

    With your CNC skills improving, you should revisit some of your Tesla projects using more and more metal parts! It would be cool to see the turbines last longer.

    • @jtwarner13
      @jtwarner13 3 роки тому

      @Jonah lopes cardozo lol same to you! A bit of a rarity

    • @jtwarner13
      @jtwarner13 3 роки тому

      @Jonah lopes cardozo Lol you too dude! It is a rare name to see

  • @warzonebeast6254
    @warzonebeast6254 3 роки тому +2605

    Video Idea: now that you have higher a working rocket of sorts, make a big one with multiple output nozzles, or a multi stage rocket!
    Tomatoes are disgusting!! 🍅

    • @lortzo573
      @lortzo573 3 роки тому +25

      multi stage rocket sounds dangerous, i want to see it!

    • @brytoncathcart7624
      @brytoncathcart7624 3 роки тому +7

      I hope you get the 3d printer!

    • @maxmakez5015
      @maxmakez5015 3 роки тому +4

      Probs doesn't have enough thrust to lift off

    • @acasualblenderer
      @acasualblenderer 3 роки тому +2

      Multi stage rocket!!
      ( love that idea)

    • @mechadraws
      @mechadraws 3 роки тому +1

      Good idea

  • @jnplnrvl9581
    @jnplnrvl9581 3 роки тому +147

    the porous ceramic part was such a genius idea.

    • @markgeorge447
      @markgeorge447 3 роки тому +6

      Yeah I guess it's inspired by catalyst converters put in cars

    • @LetsDrawDragons
      @LetsDrawDragons 3 роки тому +1

      @@markgeorge447 or catalysts used for chemical synthesis

    • @TM-529
      @TM-529 3 роки тому +3

      Actually a poor idea, oxygen peroxide is a rocket fuel in itself (monopropellant) and has been used for decades by nasa as a way to propel small rockets & position satellites. All you need to convert H2O2 into supersonic steam is a silver mesh acting as a catalyst. This is also how the Bell jet pack was propelled.

    • @LetsDrawDragons
      @LetsDrawDragons 3 роки тому +5

      @@TM-529 it's not a poor idea it's different

    • @TM-529
      @TM-529 3 роки тому +1

      @@LetsDrawDragons Different..yes - Genius as the OP stated....far IMHO

  • @zeekjones1
    @zeekjones1 3 роки тому +10

    That sludge at the end can be used to line the edges of the reaction chamber, just like a sugar rocket.
    Leaving a hole through the center going straight to the nozzle from the peroxide injector.
    _The nozzle is honestly optional with the sheer pressure coming out; bigger exit, less explosion, more retrys._

  • @PlasmaChannel
    @PlasmaChannel 3 роки тому +445

    But did this Devil's toothpaste go down to Georgia, Tomato lord? Or shall I say Rocket Lord?

  • @AkrimaSablosang
    @AkrimaSablosang 3 роки тому +47

    one thing I love is that, the more Integza progresses, the less his engines look like modded water bottle, as they take a much more legit and pro look.

    • @ethan2570
      @ethan2570 3 роки тому +1

      They’re at the laser cannon stage rn

  • @victor9sur768
    @victor9sur768 3 роки тому +24

    you could try suspending the MnO2 or KMnO4 with the 3d printed ceramic part to particle impregnate the part, and then calcine/anneal the catalyst to the support (around 600C ish). it should prevent the manganese losses and prevent the blockages/high back pressures. the flow through the support should increase the surface contact with the heterogeneous catalyst improving the mass transfer making the reaction go boom boom faster

    • @kaistumer198
      @kaistumer198 3 роки тому +1

      The problem is that would yield Mno2, which way less reactive

    • @harryconover289
      @harryconover289 2 роки тому

      Nice end comment abut the boom boom

  • @Ididathing
    @Ididathing 3 роки тому +20

    Please brush your teeth with this!

  • @LabCoatz_Science
    @LabCoatz_Science 3 роки тому +16

    What if you used the oxygen created in this case to fuel a hybrid rocket? You could create another gas generator that makes something like hydrogen or acetylene, mix the flammable gas with the oxygen in a combustion chamber, and ignite the mix. If you tuned it right, it might not explode, lol...like if want to see this tried! I might do it on my own channel if Integza doesn't try it first!

    • @kylehurly6420
      @kylehurly6420 3 роки тому +2

      YESSS! DO IT INTEGZAAAA!!

    • @BlackBird-nn2yc
      @BlackBird-nn2yc 3 роки тому

      hydrogen peroxide has been used as an oxidizer in hyperbolic rockets (aka the propellant ignites itself when combined). but normally they use Liquid oxygen because you get a higher specific impulse (basically gas milage for rockets)

  • @pazakkattack
    @pazakkattack 3 роки тому +39

    I'd love to see you revisit some of the older rockets you've made using the hot tips given by people in the comments. There's almost always at least one person with an easy fix that'd make your insane machines work even better and I'd love to see it.

  • @raffaeldecarvalhogoncalves1554
    @raffaeldecarvalhogoncalves1554 3 роки тому +95

    Please do a linear aerospike rocket engine

  • @Yaivenov
    @Yaivenov 3 роки тому +63

    The day Integza made his own pressure fed monopropellant rocket engine. Beautifully done! Next step: internship at JPL.

    • @Yaivenov
      @Yaivenov 3 роки тому

      P.S.: I hope you develop this into a bipropellant engine, Integza. Peroxide and alcohol is a well established combination.

  • @RadioactiveModder
    @RadioactiveModder 3 роки тому +15

    I'd be super interested in seeing a video to explore what other kinds of things you can do with those porus ceramic parts. They worked so well in providing a lot of dry contact area for the permanganate.

  • @cacaokingdom3122
    @cacaokingdom3122 3 роки тому +24

    For a video idea, saturate your ceramic blocks with silver (colloidal silver?) instead. This is what is used in jetpacks. It flashes to steam and doesn't have the nastiness that elephant toothpaste does as it flashes to pure steam.

  • @nicholasjensen8016
    @nicholasjensen8016 3 роки тому +3

    Instead of using a secondary source to compress the plunger, you could use a small tube to take some of the pressure generated by the reaction. This way it will make the reaction self-sustained once initiated.

  • @azibros
    @azibros 3 роки тому +181

    Idea:You should make a liquid cooled engine. like they do in real rockets.

    • @i-muts
      @i-muts 3 роки тому +9

      real rocket engines pump the superchilled fuels through the nozzle to cool them, its pretty clever.

    • @azibros
      @azibros 3 роки тому +2

      @@i-muts ye ik, thats why i suggested, i find it cool too

    • @BlackBird-nn2yc
      @BlackBird-nn2yc 3 роки тому +4

      or ablative cooling, basically have the engine burn away *on purpose*

    • @azibros
      @azibros 3 роки тому +3

      @@BlackBird-nn2yc he has done that already lol

    • @vishalpranav9490
      @vishalpranav9490 3 роки тому +2

      @@i-muts yup, with the added benefit of getting the fuel warmed up before combustion.

  • @ciscoshark
    @ciscoshark 3 роки тому +34

    As fun as it is to see the reaction as it happens, I recommend that you dedicate a video to experimenting with different materials for an ignition chamber. (Aluminum tubing, thicker PVC, carbon fiber, etc.)

  • @reilukeras
    @reilukeras 3 роки тому +76

    Video idea: You should try to weight your next rocket before and after testing it. So you can estimate how much thrust force you should have, velocity at the nozzle... Things like that.

    • @logicbuilder1204
      @logicbuilder1204 3 роки тому +1

      if you know the weight of the fuel, you could figure out the isp of the rocket engine, which is the measurement of the efficacy of a rocket nozzle. I don't imagine it would be that high, around 60 to 70, but it could be over 200, which is standard for atmospheric rockets.

    • @matheusclarkson3358
      @matheusclarkson3358 3 роки тому

      OMG you are a genius.

    • @MrTheoror
      @MrTheoror 3 роки тому

      Great idea! And I'm not saying it cuz you payed me

    • @Yaivenov
      @Yaivenov 3 роки тому +1

      @@logicbuilder1204 HTP monopropellant tops out in the mid 100's. The efficiency losses with his current experimental assembly probably have it around 20-40. For reference nitrogen cold gas using a modern nozzle design is 90.

    • @logicbuilder1204
      @logicbuilder1204 3 роки тому +2

      @@Yaivenov makes sense. Nice to see a fellow ksp player.

  • @PommyDragon2525
    @PommyDragon2525 3 роки тому +5

    Seeing a video comparing the weight of different rocket engines before and after thrust would be cool. Show how much mass is released in the exhaust of the rocket and factor how that changes the thrust as it gets lighter.

  • @ezrarichardson279
    @ezrarichardson279 3 роки тому +35

    This was actually a so much more impressive than your past engines! It actually worked better then you expected for once! Now you just need it to be a little more repeatable and it will be great!

  • @acrylicmarlin6356
    @acrylicmarlin6356 3 роки тому +127

    "We literally made a rocket ship"
    Integza: *It's free real-estate*

  • @jeffmuntz2394
    @jeffmuntz2394 3 роки тому +17

    7:05 “and to that i have to say: bedankt!” That was weird to hear, never expected him to thank us in dutch haha

    • @habedoudefiant3754
      @habedoudefiant3754 3 роки тому

      @koenvn2 je bedoelt alsjeblieft!

    • @rikdekuiper9773
      @rikdekuiper9773 3 роки тому

      Ja dat was zeker raar toen ik dat hoorde

    • @jeffmuntz2394
      @jeffmuntz2394 3 роки тому

      @koenvn2 oh man, wanneer houd dit kansloze ‘gekoloniseerd’ nou eens op..

  • @SarahGreyWolf
    @SarahGreyWolf 3 роки тому +3

    Definitely looking forward to one day seeing you attempt a variable thrust engine and mounting it to a model airplane or something

  • @philippreuner2508
    @philippreuner2508 3 роки тому +56

    Video idea:
    Try making a turbo pump for your liquid fueled monoprop engine.
    That would replace the syringes and could give you (in theory) a much higher chamber pressure and therefore more thrust.
    Don't know if the current design can handle this kind of loads though and you might need a larger nozzle due to increased expansion of the exhaust gas

    • @lairdcummings9092
      @lairdcummings9092 3 роки тому +7

      In the news, next week:
      "Local inventor sends tomato into low earth orbit."

    • @afoxwithahat7846
      @afoxwithahat7846 3 роки тому

      I though about that too, turbines should manage the pressure much better

    • @Consequator
      @Consequator 3 роки тому

      In other words, look up the ME163 Komet engine.

    • @Ender240sxS13
      @Ender240sxS13 3 роки тому +2

      So unnecessary and over complicated, a pressure fed monoprop engine like this can make sooo much more thrust than he's currently making, his design is good, just needs to work on the materials a bit more so it stops blowing up and leaking

    • @TheWizardGamez
      @TheWizardGamez 3 роки тому +1

      @@lairdcummings9092 inventor said “fuck the tomatoes, hope they freeze dried well. Whoops I mean by to say freeze died

  • @walterer7077
    @walterer7077 3 роки тому +211

    Use high pressure water pipes with standard fittings and stop use glue everywhere! These will withstand much more pressure ᕦ(✰ω✰)ᕤ
    #suggestion for new videos
    P.S.
    You are making amazing progress!

    • @siamsurf
      @siamsurf 3 роки тому +7

      Stuff blowing up is a big part of the fun making/watching these videos. :-)

    • @TheWizardGamez
      @TheWizardGamez 3 роки тому +6

      We’re here for explosions, I don’t think he has a test field so metal parts moving at high speed aren’t exactly… great for you neighborhood bomb maker

    • @Null8fuenf10
      @Null8fuenf10 3 роки тому +6

      Siri, how to build a 'pipe bomb':
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    • @Tom-ku8bu
      @Tom-ku8bu 3 роки тому

      He just needs a bigger nozzle. So that the pressure can get out instead of building up

    • @lightningxx
      @lightningxx 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah if you want to make bombs

  • @alden1132
    @alden1132 3 роки тому +25

    I've always wanted to see someone build a solar-oven, solar water heater, or solar panel that tracks the sun automatically. I have a few ideas for how to make it work, but I currently lack the resources or space to test my ideas. I would be very interested to see how YOU would approach the challenge, and what solutions you would come up with.

    • @zuthalsoraniz6764
      @zuthalsoraniz6764 3 роки тому +2

      I remember seeing something that used simply four light sensors controlling two motors driving an altazimuth mount, and a shade that will just barely shield those if it is pointing straight at the sun. If it is pointing slightly off, one or two of the sensors will receive sunlight, and thus cause the motors to turn the contraption until it is pointed directly at the sun.

    • @alden1132
      @alden1132 3 роки тому +2

      @@zuthalsoraniz6764 That's a clever idea. It's similar in concept to one of my own imagined possible solutions, and seems like it's relatively cheap and simple. Thanks for sharing the idea! One of my ideas was for a more "passive" solution, like calculating (using math that's currently beyond **me**, personally) whether or not there is an "optimal" shape for a parabolic mirror that can be aligned with the "arc" the sun describes as it moves through the sky, so that *less* effort is needed to keep it in the optimal position.

    • @peterjohnson9438
      @peterjohnson9438 3 роки тому +3

      as long as you place the device in a completely clear area, you can create a simple bit of control software where the logic goes something like this... For initial startup, rotate entire assembly for the full range of motion, at a 45 degree elevation. The angle where you get the highest voltage out of your cells is the sun position. Rotate assembly to that and sweep through elevation from 0 to 90 degrees, record the highest voltage, rotate to that. Done, you're facing the sun. Following that, every 5 minutes, sweep the device left to right by a small amount (like +/- 10 degrees) and record the highest voltage, lock to that, then adjust elevation.
      Sleep for 8 hours if voltage drops below a certain threshold or unless the threshold is tripped again - that's your night mode. Once night mode ends, revert to initial startup.
      You can make this logic work with a cheap Arduino. You'll also need a car battery, two motors and two motor controllers, some solar panels and a bunch of metal to build the rotating frame out of. Keep all the electronics (including battery) as part of the mobile assembly, Run a long extension cord. Use a free-rotation extension cord if you can.
      Good luck, the project is pretty easy but will require some bumbling around with the code and the welding.
      (The reason you do a full sweep at wakeup/startup is to avoid accidentally tracking local maxima such as a reflection from a window or someone's driveway light. With algorithms, sometimes dumber is better.)

  • @OAikoT
    @OAikoT 3 роки тому +1

    Do you remember your compressed air engine video Integza? You should try and make an RC plane that uses one and make it fly. If your going to go for a CO2 propellant maybe try adding some pressure regulating valve so that it doesn't come out as fast and without solid chunks of CO2 while also having it at a slight downward angle and use the bigger 88g CO2 cartridge instead of the small 12g you have used before. Alternatively maybe a metal steel container that you could compress air into. I remember Slingshot channel making insane contraption that could take huge amounts of air pressure safely, thought it is heaver so you might need glider size wings to be able to lift that.

  • @jorockgalvan
    @jorockgalvan 3 роки тому +71

    i would love to see this project revisited with the use of epoxy and maybe even carbon fiber for the structural support you need

    • @LogoMasterWT
      @LogoMasterWT 3 роки тому

      I like this idea

    • @Nobe_Oddy
      @Nobe_Oddy 3 роки тому

      i like metal pipes better, no offence

    • @LogoMasterWT
      @LogoMasterWT 3 роки тому

      @@Nobe_Oddy I would just take a steel tube and done not translucent but

  • @cacaokingdom3122
    @cacaokingdom3122 3 роки тому +13

    This is essentially how the classic jetpack works. They use a high concentration hydrogen peroxide with a silver or platinum mesh screen as a catalyst to instantly vaporize the H2O2 into steam.

    • @L39T
      @L39T 3 роки тому

      My jetpack runs on hopes and dreams

    • @Mr_Reaps25
      @Mr_Reaps25 3 роки тому

      @@L39T so it is ruined?

  • @toddvlong
    @toddvlong 3 роки тому +9

    Fire Fighting Nozzle
    Since you play with fire so much I think a fire fighting nozzle would be cool. Something that mixes water and soap together to make a foam for putting out fires.

  • @atrumluminarium
    @atrumluminarium Рік тому +1

    Ok the impregnated ceramic idea was genius tbh

  • @ryant1626
    @ryant1626 3 роки тому +130

    You should have millions of viewers. You always release awesome content, and always, on a consistent basis, I genuinely laugh out loud during the duration of the videos. Every video. Thank you, sir, for always making my day better when I watch your videos. In the future, I know that you will have a huge audience. Millions. People who do not subscribe eat raw tomato sandwiches. Eww

    • @kingmasterlord
      @kingmasterlord 3 роки тому +3

      just a matter of time.

    • @kingmasterlord
      @kingmasterlord 3 роки тому

      @Meisya Denia why do you think that works on anyone but post middle-aged men?

    • @tonyhussey3610
      @tonyhussey3610 3 роки тому +2

      @@kingmasterlord haha doesn't work on us either... Doesn't matter the age...just the IQ..

    • @kingmasterlord
      @kingmasterlord 3 роки тому

      @@tonyhussey3610 just cuz you one of the real ones doesn't mean they're in a high proportion of jackasses in your age group. the jackasses in mine fall for different shit than this is what I'm saying.

    • @tonyhussey3610
      @tonyhussey3610 3 роки тому +1

      @@kingmasterlord just cuz you know your age group well , does this imply you know my age group well too 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @notan_marko7314
    @notan_marko7314 3 роки тому +8

    Make a front well drive bicycle

  • @curtisslemieux7063
    @curtisslemieux7063 3 роки тому +5

    On i feel like making this out of steel for the “combustion chamber” would work quite well and you may be able to seal it better with threaded ends. That one way valve would be able to thread in and it wouldnt be able to jump off

  • @wilsonrawlin8547
    @wilsonrawlin8547 2 роки тому

    Turn the rubber plunger part around in the syringe. Nice build. Try stronger polymer containers for the reaction chamber, fittings, plunger assembly, etc.

  • @IoCalisto_
    @IoCalisto_ 3 роки тому +23

    AH yes, accidentally making pipebombs, my favorite youtube series

  • @jrtanker2271
    @jrtanker2271 3 роки тому +11

    I love how when he figures out to use the old syringes and that pirates of the Caribbean esc music starts playing, the syringe popping out is a near perfect octave Above the key of the piece making it a perfect last note to the phrase.

  • @wellensgamingodds3228
    @wellensgamingodds3228 3 роки тому +6

    I highly recommend changing out the plastic for metal parts to deal with the pressure, as is we've seen enough of the combustion, its time you made something for long term repeated use.

    • @Nworthholf
      @Nworthholf 3 роки тому +1

      ....or use transparent aluminum!
      (not sure about its chemical resistance tho)

    • @wellensgamingodds3228
      @wellensgamingodds3228 3 роки тому

      @@Nworthholf If not for the fact that its yet to become a mass produced item, that would work to some degree; so to expansive at this time, so hopefully in a few decades then.

  • @willwahlberg1890
    @willwahlberg1890 3 роки тому +3

    This is so awesome. You should totallu try making a radial engine using similar ingredients as your turbo jet engine. I want to attempt to make my own jet engine in the future. Your videos have been a great resource!

  • @kesakhan
    @kesakhan 3 роки тому +20

    So your KMnO4 is reacting with the H2O2 to make KOH (lye) and MnO2. The MnO2 that it makes will be super fine and have a massive amount of surface area which then the H2O2 can decompose on. Pretty cool stuff.

    • @lunachable1
      @lunachable1 3 роки тому +3

      I like you funny words, magic man

    • @Alsry1
      @Alsry1 3 роки тому

      KOH isn’t lye, NaOH is.

    • @kesakhan
      @kesakhan 3 роки тому

      @@Alsry1 yes and no. If you're a chemist lye refers to the leachate of wood ash/pot-ash (this is where the name potassium comes from) which is predominantly KOH, so historically lye referred to KOH and not NaOH. You are correct though that lye now more so refers to NaOH as it is far cheaper to produce and has replaced KOH as the "household" alkali salt.

    • @Mr_Reaps25
      @Mr_Reaps25 3 роки тому

      @@lunachable1 beat me to it

    • @lunachable1
      @lunachable1 3 роки тому

      @@Mr_Reaps25 beat meat to it

  • @caz0011666
    @caz0011666 3 роки тому +17

    Video idea: Could you do something with laminar flow! Always find it super interesting, and I wonder if you could print a laminar flow nozzle that would work for a light up display (to send a rocket through at some point!)

  • @chasecortes2385
    @chasecortes2385 3 роки тому +6

    jet japck integza jetpack do itttttt

  • @superrouter
    @superrouter Рік тому +1

    This dude builds everyhing except regular rocket engines

  • @tyrelgoshorn7863
    @tyrelgoshorn7863 3 роки тому +16

    Wow. Great idea using the ceramic as a substrate for the catalist. Also, Jackie Chan is awesome, and tomatoes are delicious.

  • @sleuthyz
    @sleuthyz 3 роки тому +17

    Video Idea: Now strap it to a Rocket (but reinforce the dang thing to withstand those pressures) , who cares if NASA wasn't built in 2 days, Integza Space Program was.

    • @drakinkoren
      @drakinkoren 3 роки тому

      Built in 2 days... of 3D printing!

  • @archie4521
    @archie4521 3 роки тому +56

    This would be *incredibly* inefficient _but_ it would be interesting to see how much electricity you can generate when using that reaction to shoot the gases into a closed mill that's hooked up to a small motor. Or something similar.

    • @zangryomani1257
      @zangryomani1257 3 роки тому

      @Meisya Denia Get out of here

    • @zangryomani1257
      @zangryomani1257 3 роки тому +5

      tesla devil turbine

    • @archie4521
      @archie4521 3 роки тому

      @@zangryomani1257 That's a good name lol

    • @zangryomani1257
      @zangryomani1257 3 роки тому +2

      @@archie4521 thanks, but if he makes this, he should employ built in disk spacers, but there on the outer perimeter, and they deflect the moving fluid toward the center, similar to the second version of his tesla turbine, but there on the outside. this would also give it more tourqe, and should be used to try and make a steam engine

  • @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV
    @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV 11 місяців тому

    Nice one! :)
    Those pavers are rough and provided some resistance to the skateboard wheels, on a smooth surface it would really rip along!

  • @Alaparus
    @Alaparus 3 роки тому +6

    This reminds me of "water bottle rockets" that simply push water out using compressed air.
    Maybe try pressurising the air and peroxide in the same bottle before pushing it through the catalyst, removing the need for the syringe entirely.
    Bearing in mind the system is gravity fed if you plan on using a horizontal test bed.
    I want to see your motors make something fly!

    • @Yaivenov
      @Yaivenov 3 роки тому

      This would work. It is done in real rockets too where there is no bladder/liner inside the propellant tank to keep pressurant separated from propellant. It just adds the requirement for ullaging to settle the propellant in the tanks. Apollo did this using the smaller rcs engines to apply a little forward thrust, the bipropellants for the AJ10-137 thus settled to the bottom of the tank.
      So yeah, omitting the syringe and pressurizing the perozide container directly should work just fine.

    • @CharlieSolis
      @CharlieSolis 3 роки тому

      Not a bad idea. Even just having a water section after the hydrogen peroxide/steam nozzle that the pressure built up forces the water out. Having the heavier mass be thrusted backwards will give a much higher impulse.

    • @Yaivenov
      @Yaivenov 3 роки тому

      @@CharlieSolis that would be less efficient. You want your exhaust gasses/reaction medium coming out the nozzle to be as low mass and high velocity as possible.

  • @jacobholoway3574
    @jacobholoway3574 3 роки тому +34

    Video idea: You should do a “hand tool only challenge” rocket build with a budget of $30 and only allowed to use hand tools. Keep up the great work!

    • @halogeek6
      @halogeek6 2 роки тому

      I mean a pcb pipe a hacksaw some duck tape and whatever you can get your hands on for fuel. Boom make shift rocket for less then 30 bucks made from hand tools.

    • @TheWorstBridger
      @TheWorstBridger 2 роки тому

      @@halogeek6 a source of KNO3 (65pt) and granulated sugar (35pt) and oxidiser (if you want this is not required)

  • @donaldfarmer9932
    @donaldfarmer9932 3 роки тому +7

    My suggestion is…a “Best of Integza” video, featuring those “learning” moments. I’m sure there is enough to create a number of “learning” moments!!!

  • @tswdev
    @tswdev 3 роки тому +4

    Video idea: attach 6 of these in parallel like the Atlas HLV rocket, have the tip contain a CO2 cartridge (this would distribute the pressure by all 6, should be about 9 bar pressure to each and use a vent valve to control output pressure, you dont need all co2 contents, so it doesnt have to be efficient but its lower weight and size, plus the vent will create lots of smoke which is cool for video!). Use a membrane (like the ketchup bottles) to separate the water from the fuel or a burst cap (plastic film?) if its not water proof enough, this should make it all a single component with no need for glue or any other weak points. Bigger == better! That should make an awesome video!

  • @magikben
    @magikben 3 роки тому +49

    This was an great result. On each of these I would be curious how much of the thrust is accounted for by the energy put into the system by the pressurized air or whatever else is used to move the materials. I am also voting Integza as “Most Likely To Blow Himself Up”. Don’t want to see that of course but man o man I cringe at times! For the science!

    • @chris-graham
      @chris-graham 3 роки тому +1

      Hello fellow racer!

    • @SeanBZA
      @SeanBZA 3 роки тому +1

      I would say the air input only accounts for a tiny bit at the beginning, the plunger does keep it well separate from the chamber. Most of the thrust here is from the reaction making steam, just like the Heinkel rocket plane did with the same fuel combinations.

    • @magikben
      @magikben 3 роки тому

      @@SeanBZA In this video I agree that the additional energy is minimal but in others it is significant

  • @MrMartinSchou
    @MrMartinSchou 3 роки тому +18

    At this point you're into plumbing, which can be tricky. Thankfully UA-cam has a fantastic certified plumber who can probably help. And he also has a bit of a thing for rockets, which might be helpful.
    What I'm trying to say is that you should definitely look into doing a collaboration with Colin Furze about the next step :D

  • @AurumEquus
    @AurumEquus 3 роки тому +6

    When you pushed the syringe out with compressed air it was such a satisfying POP sound ^^

  • @markrix
    @markrix Місяць тому

    High test peroxide and silver catalyst makes a pretty neat rocket engine, a liquid catalyst would work also

  • @justinmolina4557
    @justinmolina4557 3 роки тому +6

    Integza your rocket it producing lots of O2, add fuel and a 3D printed nozzle and BOOM a rocket or possibly a large explosion. Either way it will be cool.

    • @Mr.Paulo.
      @Mr.Paulo. 3 роки тому +1

      I was just thinking about that, the problem though is that most of this O2 is saturated with water vapor, so igniting it would be really hard, maybe if he could dry out the exhausted vapors it could turn into a legit combustion rocket engine

    • @justinmolina4557
      @justinmolina4557 3 роки тому +2

      @@Mr.Paulo. that’s the thing gasses do not care about moister. Just look at when a propane vessel is on fire. No amount of water will put it out.

    • @Mr.Paulo.
      @Mr.Paulo. 3 роки тому +1

      @@justinmolina4557 never thought about that, so he can just mix the engine's oxygen output with some propane and make basically a flamethrower? That's some freaking cool idea to try out

    • @justinmolina4557
      @justinmolina4557 3 роки тому +1

      @@Mr.Paulo. my thought is that it would be a really high pressure exhaust. If he can contain the force it would be a a serious rocket.

  • @julien2658
    @julien2658 3 роки тому +5

    Imagine a pyromaniac with a heavy Portuguese accent who hates tomatoes and loves Nicolas Tesla…
    And I love it

  • @Orionrobots
    @Orionrobots Рік тому +3

    With the catalyst on those highly porous blocks, it almost feels like a hybrid engine. I'd love to see this made into an actual rocket now.

    • @Sniperboy5551
      @Sniperboy5551 10 місяців тому

      There was an early jet pack that used damn near the same method

    • @ClassySloth
      @ClassySloth 6 місяців тому

      @@Sniperboy5551do you know what he does to make the potassium permanganate a liquid

  • @MudakTheMultiplier
    @MudakTheMultiplier 3 роки тому +1

    Why have I never seen you channel before!? Time to go watch as many of your videos as I feasibly can.

  • @daily3ddesign
    @daily3ddesign 3 роки тому +11

    I have to be honest, I didnt even know what the video was about but when I saw that Integza uploaded I knew it was going to be good and I immediately clicked

  • @kylecroghan7802
    @kylecroghan7802 3 роки тому +4

    Integza I would love to see a video on the magnus effect because its a really cool topic :)

  • @vsharma6586
    @vsharma6586 3 роки тому +4

    *VIDEO IDEA FROM IKIA*
    Connect a mini canon to your turbo boosted jet with a Seal in between when there is enough pressure of exhaust the seal will break yeeting the load 👍

  • @frstbte14
    @frstbte14 3 роки тому

    Make your mounting points from the machined end caps deeper into the tube, having your screw hole so close to the final edge is probably why it’s unable to hold the pressure.

  • @isaiahwarriner1344
    @isaiahwarriner1344 3 роки тому +6

    I just bought my first 3d printer. I'm trying to learn everything I can so hopefully I'll be inventing and experimenting as well!

    • @Nobe_Oddy
      @Nobe_Oddy 3 роки тому

      i was thinking of getting one myself, but can I get a good one for about $200??? prolly not :(

    • @isaiahwarriner1344
      @isaiahwarriner1344 3 роки тому

      @@Nobe_Oddy creality ender 3pro

  • @alexiaaddictiv-ink1898
    @alexiaaddictiv-ink1898 3 роки тому +4

    At this rate, I'm thinking you will have a running rocket suit prototype by next year this time 😉
    Love your dedication.
    Keep up the good work.

  • @jaydenb2558
    @jaydenb2558 3 роки тому +11

    Video idea💡: You should make some project's related to Arduino.
    Arduino ➕Rockets🚀=🤯🤯
    And yeah: Tomatoes are disgusting 🤢🤢

  • @KrashFries
    @KrashFries Рік тому

    if i had to guess, the permanganate decomposing in the ceramic matrix created superfine nanoparticles embedded all over the large surface area of the ceramic; this is actually the logic behind a lot of industrial catalysts. cool that it worked!

  • @trailswithtyler7427
    @trailswithtyler7427 3 роки тому +12

    I got an idea for a future project. You should use one of your rocket engines and actually make a rocket that flys.

  • @denisvalentin7966
    @denisvalentin7966 3 роки тому +8

    Video idea : now that you have mastered the art of devil's toothpaste, you can build a canon out of it. Quite the same setup as this video except that the chamber is standing still while shooting something ! (Like tomatoes for example 😈)

  • @vorderma
    @vorderma 3 роки тому +8

    I remember when I was younger, I was consistently rinsing an item in hydrogen peroxide. I eventually set out a dish of hydrogen peroxide which I would drop the item into then retrieve it and use the same dish of hydrogen peroxide later. As young kids do, I forgot about it and went several days without using that bowl. When I finally used it again, it immediately burned (not flammably) the skin on my fingertips. The only logical assumption is that water evaporated and increased the concentration of the hydrogen peroxide. Why not try slowly evaporating hydrogen peroxide or using low heat to distill water off of it?

    • @abhimaanmayadam5713
      @abhimaanmayadam5713 3 роки тому +1

      By that point, the peroxide should have decomposed into water.

  • @minklmank
    @minklmank 3 роки тому

    Nice - you basically built a H2O2 based monopropellant rocket engine! Though your thrust in this design is capped by your maximum chamber pressure, which is limited by your maximum injection pressure which in this case is 4 bar due to your "fuel pump" design - which if i recall correctly has been used in the past by I think soviet rockets. (top of the tank as a piston head to pressurize the fuel above using pressurized gas as a driving force). A very simple and elegant solution.
    With your Ethanol / H2O2 / Permanganate experiments you by the way almost had a replica of a WW2 German V2 Rocket engine. Using H2O2 via Permanganate catalyst to drive a turbo pump that feeds an Ethanol / Water mixture and Liquid Oxygen into the chamber of the engine (water was added to reduce exhaust temperature because of problems with nozzle disintegration)

  • @WendellRust
    @WendellRust 3 роки тому +3

    Video idea: workshop tour including the types of machines and 3d printers you use. Anyway love your videos and keep up the great content.

  • @azibros
    @azibros 3 роки тому +4

    *Idea: You should extract hydrogen from water* *and use it as fuel.*

  • @CodockDraconin
    @CodockDraconin 3 роки тому +11

    Maybe find a slightly slower, steady reaction to produce the steam and use the steam to run a Tesla turbine powering a propeller. If you can make a light enough high pressure catalyst container, you may be able to get a longer running engine than just the short blast rocket engine.

  • @InservioLetum
    @InservioLetum 2 роки тому +1

    Mark Rober is literally a rocket engineer. He would have absolutely no problem getting his hands on PURE peroxide, as this is in fact a rocket fuel type still in use today. A very FUN fuel type in fact.

    • @Krustable
      @Krustable 2 місяці тому

      get your hands on a pipe, add kerosene, a little bit of peroxide, and ignite using a radio controller..
      *you've successfully made a chemical pipe bomb !!!*

  • @christopherbull3467
    @christopherbull3467 2 роки тому

    A larger check valve seems obvious I guess but im super glad you put in a direction change like that mid video! Totally made me what to follow allong more.

  • @galestaffsylleianor3215
    @galestaffsylleianor3215 3 роки тому +9

    Why not try printing a gas powered nozzle capable of accelerating air through the speed of sound, you could then combine such a nozzle with most of your other rocket or jet exhaust allowing you to greatly increase the exit velocity and so improve the amount of thrust produced. A way to do this would be to take a compressor fan/centrifugal fan like the one you used for the afterburner and use it in much the same way as in that video to produce a stream of higher pressure air, then pass this into a sufficiently converging nozzle, this will take you up to the speed of sound. The harder part is then to get the diverging nozzle on the other side to expand at the correct rate leading to supersonic flow through the bell, and then maybe some nice images of some mach diamonds out the back.

    • @sergeykuznetsov3692
      @sergeykuznetsov3692 3 роки тому +1

      The idea is good, but it wouldn't work with any commercial EDF and most DIY centrifugal fans cause De-Laval nozzles start working at pressure ratios of at least 2.5 (Chamber Pressure / Ambient Pressure), but EDF's can't go beyond 0.1 atm overpressure. To get the required pressure ratio you would need a multistage axial compressor like in a real turbo-jet engine.

    • @m.sierra5258
      @m.sierra5258 3 роки тому +2

      Idea is good, but first the chamber / plumbing has to stop blowing up :D I think you are skipping ahead here

  • @simonstastny9097
    @simonstastny9097 3 роки тому +6

    Project Idea: Maybe try to make a "professional" water rocket before building a chemical one, something that would fly hundreds of meters, you could even test it with an aerospike nozzle (or hydrospike?)!. I think it would help you develop the final version of a chemical rocket.

  • @Bakamoichigei
    @Bakamoichigei 3 роки тому +8

    "This is not safe." - _A madman intent on gleefully continuing what he is doing._

  • @nominalnostalgia1347
    @nominalnostalgia1347 2 роки тому

    I'm fairly certain that gac is a cheaper catylist for this. Using a coffee filter is a cheap and easy way to essentially transform your h202 into a mesh. Just by allowing it to soak. Impregnating the resin was cool combining it with sugar would allow the entire thing to disolve quickly.
    You should do a video that takes advantage of the oxygen release. And your previous sugar based solid fuel designs.
    Mostly because this could create a staged rocket that could provide oxidation to enhance the sugar burning method used earlier.
    With good oxidation creating a flight this way would totally reduce the weight and calibre of sparker needed to ignite the solid fuel upper stage. What's more is you could make a custom a pressure relief valve and a custom one way valve attached to a switch to start the sparker as soon as the stored O2 from the previous reaction starts flowing.
    Thus you have a two stage rocket you could use a bladder that holds the fuel (balloon) to separate the stages.
    Since the ignition would take place at altitude you would want to launch in an isolated area. Or over water.
    I really want a 3d printer to launch my own channel someday. In no way competitive with yours so hopefully you love this concept.

  • @yrmoma
    @yrmoma 3 роки тому +12

    Catalyzer sounds like a serum that some evil genius (named, ohhh, I dunno, Integza) developed to turn people into cats. Maybe that should your next video: developing the catalyzer.

    • @one_b
      @one_b 3 роки тому +2

      "This Integza guy thinks he can beat my Catinator with his Catalyzer?? Ha! Perry the Platypus? Where did you come from?" - Dr. Doofenschmirtz

  • @joespinoza6599
    @joespinoza6599 3 роки тому +10

    Tom from explosions and fire 🔥 is the shit he is legitimately one of the smartest youtubers that’s underrated cuz he’s a bit of a pyro 🧨 haha

    • @SegwayBossk
      @SegwayBossk 3 роки тому

      Him and StyroPyro are geniuses

    • @monkemonke9048
      @monkemonke9048 3 роки тому

      @@SegwayBossk yo wnna roast some marshmallows in my laser oven?

    • @SegwayBossk
      @SegwayBossk 3 роки тому

      @@monkemonke9048 hell yeah

  • @beck3319
    @beck3319 3 роки тому +4

    Would love to see a measurement on how much thrust this actually creates!

  • @ATINKERER
    @ATINKERER 2 роки тому

    You really are brilliant! The idea for impregnating the ceramic was a great idea. I was thinking of using the inside of a car's catalytic converter. The platinum film they coat the converter part with will work with the H2O2, and it will never wear out.

  • @m0011v
    @m0011v 3 роки тому +9

    you should 3d print a 3d printer:)

  • @TheDIYScienceGuy
    @TheDIYScienceGuy 3 роки тому +4

    Great video as always!!! I'm wondering, with all that oxygen in the exhaust, could it be used directly to power a hybrid rocket like you made in other videos? Or maybe an afterburner?

  • @DamianEmilio
    @DamianEmilio 3 роки тому +6

    You should add some support rings to the chamber, and then maybe attach the one way valve to that structure so that way is not only the glue that is securing it

  • @TrikeRoadPoet
    @TrikeRoadPoet 2 місяці тому

    Use peroxide rocket to push a small boat, putting the rocket force against the water for a stronger reaction, and using the water's back pressure to allow for the chemicals more time to react in the chamber before being expelled.

  • @plumfive6505
    @plumfive6505 3 роки тому +6

    I wouldn't recommend using plastic gloves when burning things, if a hot flame or a drop of hot liquid, in fact, if anything hot reaches your gloves, the latex will melt and you'll have a great tale to tell when you go camping with your friends and family. Other than that, great video as always.

  • @jibkantyadav8264
    @jibkantyadav8264 3 роки тому +5

    You should make a rocket using this and launch it to space

  • @Ray-qd1dk
    @Ray-qd1dk 3 роки тому +3

    make an actual rocket with this, except you might not be using any compressed air to push the peroxide, that will be done by the help of gravity ;)

    • @KyberRay
      @KyberRay 3 роки тому

      Daaang, that's a really cool idea thoo!