Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter, etc.. ( Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve our future content. A big thank you from all of us.
Mercury doesn't have gravity. It has Acceleration. 107,000 mph vs the Earth's 67,000. That means and probe sent to Mercury must be accelerated an additional 40,000 mph. Your other mistake is that the sun doesn't have gravity either. Think about it. The sun's mass is equal to 99.85% the mass of the entire solar system. So how can a Jupiter size planet which is .1% the mass of the sun, act on the sun from 100s of millions of miles away. It can't because mass does not attract mass. Thumbs down for not understanding something as simple as gravity being an artifact of Acceleration. The Reactionary force in Newton's Laws of motion.
Wars advance science quicker than anything. Look at the nuclear age,radar,jet engines and about a million other things. Remember it was only because of the v2 rocket/bomb we only got to the moon. War restores survival of the fittest and t
I think it’s more about the money powerful people get from war. Because there doesn’t have to be so many people in poverty or homeless and yet there is. But yall wanna spend the money on space. Most of us including you, will never even go to space. Even if earth was about to get blown up by something huge, we’d be right here about to die while the rich and powerful get tf on in a big space ship.
Back in the sixties, we found the money for space, because we HAD to do everything before the Russians. Now that we don't have any competition anymore, there is no more incentive. 😢
What’s his name. Eddie Bravo mentioned this. The only motivation left for space travel is a new world order. To unite the entire world against an alien threat. Or to escape our dying planet. Which btw is only dying for us. As good as the earth is at creating life, it’s even better at ending it. 99% of all species that have ever existed, are now all extinct. We are next. I hope the next species after us can treat our planet better. All these global warming, earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes. Is literally the earth trying to get rid of us.
ive been to all but Neptunne and Uranus.... with my telescope.. i think the moon is still my fav to gaze at... then Jupiter and its moons... then Saturn... then Deep Space Objects, Orion Nebula, Messier Objects, Andromeda...
Its not hard , it's extremely expensive. I worked in a shop for many years , customers would have something they needed built or repaired and often asked if it could be done. I loved the owners reply... " we can do anything if you have the money "
@@shinski8114 I work a typical 40 hour a week Job , I do it to put food on the table for my family and a roof overhead. I am in my 50s and started working at 18. So to answer , Yes , money means alot to me , but truth told it is less important to me than Time. So yes , my time is valuable unlike money I cannot make more I only have so much.
To me the world should come togehter as one and it should t have absolutely nothing to do with money but everything with saving mankind knowing that one day our solar system will die and yes I know it's a long time away but I believe they should start working at it right now to find a way to get people to another place like kepler, but it's sad people can't get o er money and someone wanting to be in charge. Work together
I don't know about everyone else , but my time on this planet I know is limited , in fact it's pretty much the one thing that I have absolutely no way of making more of. As a result it is the most valuable commodity I own , and as such my time is definitely not free. Add to that money is much more simple , fits in the wallet , easy to carry around , would way rather use it than have to B.S around and barter with folks like the stone ages.
@@kalen1702 misinformation, such as? Wild to make such a claim and not back it up. I'm not saying I'm some expert and can tell you that everything here is correct but I'm very interested to know what is false in this video
In my opinion, we need to solve all socioeconomic issues currently plaguing Earth before we can even _think_ about making the journey to a different planet. We need to become united in our efforts. It can't be the US, Russia, or China alone. It needs to be a combined effort of brilliant minds and brave men all throughout the world.
Without a big project like a moon base annonced by a main power, nobody will resolve anything, so to wait for everyone (especially todays Western politicians) to get together and decide on sound policies is futile. We need an ambitious space project to get people together and not wait around for political solutions that will never come because the ruling class is only interested in control in order to stay in power.
@@spontaneouz1000-sr6lsso you think we should just give up? Stupid to say such a thing. Did the modern postal system become the new standard if we had just given up? What about getting to the moon? How aboit inventing the wheel or any other significant invention. Anything worth a damn is going to relieve resistance. But that's cause they're jealous they didn't have the brains to come up with the idea themselves.
PERSONALLY, I Agree with You!!!😮😊 And Would brig the Cold Water Backet To "All False Enthusiasts"!!! Sorry Guys THE JET PROPULTION or RACKET WAS INVENTED WHEN The Chinese Make The Gun Powder and Shoot the First FIRE WORKS IN THE SKY!!! NOTHING HAVE CHANGE.... WELL WE Scaled Up a LITTLE😮😅😂😊❤!THE Technology is the SAME! SORRY. 😮😮😮😢😢😢😊😊😊
It is more beneficial. There is little to no benefit spending a significant amount of money on space exploration. We should keep the budgets reasonable and send probes. Send people, no way. For what purpose? We cannot live there. We will not want to live there. It is a silly dream. People don't even want to live in Antarctica. Antarctica is like a soft summer evening on the beach compared to Mars or the Moon. Just look what happened sending people to the moon. We did it. OK. Now what? Nothing. Over 50 years and we are trying to figure out why we went and the next steps. If we want to work on something work on making the cost of LEO significantly cheaper and easier. Money should be used for health and disease research and helping eliminate poverty in real ways such as clean water, and ample food. Also we could focus on nuclear power.
Your problem is one of rate. The raindrops are easily dispatched by running. P.S. the "Tiptoe" method has largely been proven a conspiracy, floated by the late, great Mr. Tim.
I would enjoy seeing a video on Triton! I'm not terribly knowledgeable when it comes to the moon systems of the Ice Giants. One day, it would be nice to get some solid orbiters to all the major solar system bodies. Thank you for this video! God be with you out there everybody. ✝️ :)
It sounds like humans are the equivalent to someone who would like to travel miles across an uncharted ocean to the smallest land point beyond the horizon, while at the same time being barely capable of driving our car to our friends house a town over 😅
@@neilrichardson7454 SO RUDE, Im willing to travel any distance as long as your on the same* landmass. Car? Built so much of Toronto but this generation gets rewarded NOTHING.
@@neilrichardson7454 WHAT? Im the guy who PROTECTS and BUILDS your homes, HUH?! *falls to his knees and looks at ground with disappointment* dude... I gave like 7 years of extreme labor to build your towers... I got a 4 page resume of my skills and work history in Toronto. You REALLY are gonna throw that away? Because of morals? Im 31 man
Think of it as walking north from the southernmost tip of South America, up the American continents, crossing the frozen arctic by the North Pole, and then walking south through Asia, into Africa, all the way down to the Cape of Good Hope. It could be done, but it ain't gonna be easy.
I want more videos like that ...including from Triton... Tho solar system is so complex...and when you say you know everything than you will know less because there are many things left who can surprise you ....
One interesting thing to consider is "removing" resources from Earth if we do start making bases elsewhere. Obviously this can be offset by collecting resources from wherever we put up bases but surely there would be a significant cost to move those resources to Earth for refining before that infastructure is created at those outer bases.
..........Why did you leave out half of the main reason its hard to reach mercury.? Yes the sun accelerates your ship but thats not the main issue. The main issue is the absolute insane amount of speed you have to have to get an intercept with mercury when you do a burn from earth orbit. It's a crazy amount of needed delta V. To get to mars only requires slightly more delta V then it takes to get to the moon. The delta V required for mercury is absolutely crazy.
It always amazes me that we do not know what is on our moon so close but yet we find colourful photos of planets that we will never reach at least with our current technology! Hats off to the photographer, great work indeed but you ain’t fooling me!
Although I would love to see a manned mission to Mars in my lifetime it just doesn't seem feasible. But we are more then capable today to get back to the moon and even set up base stations there, Which is what we should be focusing on as a baby step to eventually reaching Mars and possibly beyond.
With The Biden Administration running things...not only won't we Not return to The Moon successfully....we'll be lucky to launch a Rocket into the Sky...and actually hit it ! *FJB !*
Mercury is relatively uninteresting. Venus is basically hell. Mars is the only real option for the next step of human exploration. It's entirely likely they will send supplies ahead of the manned mission (similar to the Martian). After Mars, moons of Jupiter and Saturn are a must to explore more thoroughly as they are probably the best possibility for life.
There's NO possibility of living on any of these celestial objects, it would be easier by a million times to just construct full habitats on the ocean floor, the engineering would be similar except keeping pressure out rather than keeping pressure in... The reasons for doing this would be to try and survive an asteroid strike or solar eruption or supervolcano eruption, because even with one of these phenomena erasing a part of the atmosphere, the under ocean habitat would still be able to be viable with technology creating oxygen from the water.... There is simply no way to create soil on a totally sterile celestial object, and even the grit that is available would be totally unsuitable because of different chemical and isotopic concentrations... An atmospheric low pressure situation would eventually resolve somewhat by water vapor gradually increasing the pressure but that assumes that the sun's output is about the same.... What's really a pity is that these engineering problems could be solved and I'm sure various universities and private programs have people working on such pie in the sky options however, the longer we let governments or rather the corporate conglomerations that control governments waste resources and time and effort and treasure on war and other conflict, the less likely it's ever going to happen......
People like to pretend that if we didn't spend money on 'defense' there would be lots of money to colonize space. We could spend everything we have trying to put a city up on the moon. For what? Who wants to live there? We have empty deserts and tundra and swamps with no one living in them and they are far easier to live in than living on the frickin moon. People could live on the ocean floor easier. For want purpose should we have people living on the moon? All that is there is dirt. We have plenty of that here.
Oh it's happening, with the extremely lower standards and education curriculum we will definitely get some billionaire version of the submersible Titanic whatever it was. Not saying they will get out of our atmosphere but they will be classified as crewed missions, probably even sell the seats instead of having qualified people.
I'm still trying to decide if we should even be exploring space. Why? Hear me out... First, we left trash all over the lands of Earth. Then, we trashed up the oceans. Next, we left a crazy amount of space trash floating around our planet. Then, we left trash on our moon. And then, we followed that by crash-trashing nearby planets and not having recovery plans for stuff we've sent there (that will be trash when their missions are over). We literally can't go ANYWHERE without leaving trash behind.
Messenger had to be slowed down relative to the Sun AND relative to Mercury. As it fell inwards from Earth, the gravitational potential energy at Earth's orbital distance is converted into kinetic energy, causing the probe to be moving far quicker than an object in a circular (or nearly circular) orbit at Mercury's distance from the Sun. The flybys all slowed the probe.
Gaining and loosing the Delta V seems to be the problem and with the inner planets, Venus and Mercury, you have a lot more Delta V to shed than with Mars.
This is a fascinating futuristic topic, but I think most people would rather solve our pressing problems on Earth first. Unless we’re facing imminent extinction, maybe after fixing our own home, we should start thinking of expanding our presence in space. Some day… And let’s start with terraforming the Moon first, instead of way more distant and hostile Mars.🌙
I don’t appreciate how the writing of this video felt like it was clearly written to be turned into shorts/reels. Every 5 seconds reiterating the subject almost as if you need 30 second spans of time where you explain what we are talking about. Other than that. Great vid
Fun fact. Due to how orbits work, mercury is the closest planet to earth in terms of proximity. While venus is closer in its shortest distance mercury is closer for longer. Thats true for every planet in the solar system...no real reason for saying it I just thought it was interesting
In order to get Proxima Centauri in a reasonable amount of time, we would have to probably use multiple propulsion systems. Perhaps a laser sail propulsion system along with an ion plasma propulsion system as an assist, combined with an ultra fast launch speed, not unlike the New Horizons launch. The laser power would probably work best if in a stationary lunar orbit, similar to geostationary weather satellites. Just spitballing here, but I think it would be the best solution. Using multiple propulsion systems, I think we could get our probe(s) there in 35 to 40 years (for making such an ultra long trip, I think it would be best to send a multiple probe craft, where one could go to Proxima Centauri, while another two probes could be sent to the other two Stars, Alpha Centauri A and B. Possibly even a fly by of their planetary systems. The first encounter with another star, well, actually, multiple star systems, plus exoplanets, would be the zenith of scientific achievement. At least for a while. Mankind has a tendency to want to top themselves. Which is usually (I won't go into the ridiculousness of atomic bombs) a good thing.
This is why you record everything from documents mathematics ect when you do space exploration. You never know when you gonna kick the bucket always leave something behind for the next generation to improve upon
gdnordley has a page "going to mars?" Which shows how transit times can be halved with higher delta v capabilities. Taking into account radiation and consumables, likely actual manned transit times will be considerably less that that you get from minimum energy Hohmann transfer orbits. Quite likely half the 257 days such transfer orbits normally take.
Nice, but by far not good enough. Even if you haft the transit times, you still have to wait for 2 years for the next transit window back to earth. Mars is pointless for human conquer. Build a dozen more probes and satellites and be good.
Forget about traveling to other planets; we still haven't found a cure for cancer. That should be the MAIN FOCUS of our species and yet we're too concerned with trivial things like how to make the new i phone more sexy ffs.
If the money spent on space went to solving all our problems, we'd still have all our problems and no man on the moon and no space programs. Spce exploration has also done more for modern medicine than you can possibly realise. Case in point the massive computer advancements due to the Apollo programme; it's massive computing power today that is a foundation of cancer research right now.
And unless we get a planet as distant as Mars or Jupiter (nothing no farther) , there's zero percent chance of humanity stepping foot on any habitual planet anywhere in this universe
What if the propulsion systems that will succeed in interplanetary travel are manufactured by: Superior Space Widgets, and you, as an astronaut are sent to Mars on an extended mission to help colonize it. Then the only company that makes the vital components for the spacecraft goes out of business, and the leading scientist, and researcher passes away taking all of his secrets with him?😮😮
It would definitely be a tough situation if the company making the propulsion systems shut down and the scientist with all the secrets passed away. It shows how important it is to have backup plans and share knowledge in space exploration. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
It’s funny, when you’re a kid and first see the standard illustration of the solar system, you kinda imagine the planets are just like the moon, but only slightly incrementally further away. Like surrounding towns in your neighborhood or state; just means it a long boring car ride, but doable. The scale is just lost on you when you’re young.
My 6yo stepson told me a story the other day about the planets, he said that every planet in the universe has a purpose, he said God made those planets because depending on how you live your life on earth God will send you to one of those planets. He said that all the bad people are in hell, aka the sun. He said that he was here before, the first time he was an Indian, the second time he was black and that the bad people made him and his family collect some white stuff that made his fingers bleed (I think he's talking about cotton) and now he's Puerto Rican. Some people might think all this is made up but you need to realize his only 6yo why would a kid tell the story like that. He was telling me this thing and ask me if why was I crying and then he started crying with me. I never seen or heard a kid that young tell me a story of a previous life he lived. Creepy, scary, happy, sad, amazing.
Fun ELI5 Fact About Chips/CPUs: Satellites are equipped with more robust processors in sets of three that use the common value of two because radiation in space causes a ton of bit-flips. A bit flip is when a binary one is flipped to a zero vice-versa, causing shit like software crashing or a bsod. Yes, this even happens to your computer every single day, better systems exist these days so you are unlikely to know that it has happened. The reason it happens is because transistors are small as fuck, when they are hit with radiation they can flip, also, we've hit the limit where jumps between transistors make it really hard to find ways to decrease the size and run a stable OS.
I think the biggest hurdle to interplanetary travel is simply the limitation on speed. Its not like traveling from NY to LA where the distance remains a consistent 2,788 miles. Because planets orbit at different speeds, a delay of one day could mean tens of thousands of miles difference - a distance that we dont really have the technology to try to make up. Wed be like a dog chasing after a car.
gravity assit can propell faster than a planets orbit... you still need to show up as you get close... so you can slow down and let the gravity pull you closer. so theres a window of time your planning on. if we left earth at mars closest point... we would have landed humans on mars in 3-6 months with current tech. in 2022. itll be another 100 years or so for this to happen again.
I wonder who designed it like that. Perhaps they designed it like that on purpose to show us that we shouldn’t be trying to live on other planets. Is it by chance that our default planet seems to be the best out of the ones that are potentially “accessible “ to humans ? And what are the odds of us finding ourselves in the best place possible for our survival in this whole vast universe? As it is right now, there is nothing that is essential for human survival that has to be sourced from beyond earth . Everything we need is here from water, food, fuel, everything even non essential things like precious metals etc . Life on earth is also self sustaining. Why on earth would you want to leave such an amazing place? Exploring space for interest in science and knowledge of the universe is ok , but not to seek the next place for human habitation because it is pointless and near impossible. All we need to do is stop messing up earth, and cherish it like our survival as a species depended on it.
Hi! 1. Don't use our fuel to go on Mars instead use their fuel means use solar rays as (fuel) propelling or maneuvers force to closers as much as possible and Lithium ion for landing and take off. 2. Launch mission in 2 groups (1 active 1 stand by till successful landing) who carries necessary equipments for mission and observation but both groups should fly together one behind other. 3. Make body of mission of solar plates with double cover by metal to reach in space through our fuel and disconnect metal body for further travel through solar system.
This video is a great example of why Neil DeGrasse Tyson's such a singular talent. He would have explained this in about a third of the time in a way that was ten times more interesting.
We know that on the way to Mars the astronauts have to be able to 3D print new parts as needed. That is being tested on the ISS. For the fuel problem we know how to do it on Mars but the real problem is that NASA doesn't have a way to precisely land on Mars on a specific location, where the automated fuel production system would be located ahead of time, but this is the most feasible way to do it. Also the Mars spaceship will have to slow down by dipping into the atmosphere called "aero-braking". These strategies would greatly reduce the fuel requirement, possible cutting it by 2/3rd.
Mercury is closer to Earth than Venus is "most of the time." You even discuss how "most of the time" Mercury is closer than Mars, but yet you can't realize the same is true with Mercury and Venus. Ninety seconds in and not already are the facts wrong, you're pointing out other facts that you think would surprise people, but yet are making the same mistake yourself.
Because everyone for decades has been caught in the pointless loop of saying nobody will launch such a big space effort because we don't have boosters to put up the parts, because nobody will build such boosters because nobody has a use for such big mission payloads because nobody will design such a mission because there are no boosters to lift it. Yes, for decades, we've heard this. If there were working competing production lines for SHLV boosters (SLS heavy or Starship or Energia or SaturnV equivalent for ~110tons to orbit are minimally sufficient but still small) we'd be there. The reason why we don't have bases on the Moon and Mars and other large efforts in space has not been because we lack the technology, or it's too expensive (during the timescale of Apollo, the US spent as much on cosmetics and large States spent more on liquor than we spent going to the Moon). Nor even has lack of public support been reasons stopping it from happening. It is solely because of a lack of political will and contrary desire by elected and appointed officials: we (or they for us) decided not to go. Sea Dragon is not quite necessarily the biggest rocket devised. The later larger version of the Convair Nexus lifted 900 tonnes with a 45 meter diameter payload separation plane. The later version of the Boeing AMLLV was a 20+ meter diameter SSTO VTOVL (self-landing back onto its launch prep base) for a few hundred tons to orbit. With 12 strap-on solid or liquid 8 meter diameter boosters; 1800 tonnes into LEO.
Wouldn't we need to make manny space stations to do this trip in sections? This wpuld mean people would have to be on each station for manny years and always keep them stocked. Can this be accomplished successfully? If so how long would all of this take and what would be the cost? I wpuld love to see this happen
It would be highly interesting but, the problem is utility... As long as there are any governments with corporate systems programmed to make war with other corporate systems to try and gain dominance, man is not ready to go to space....... What for? There are people definitely ready to work on the technical and physical challenges, but without corporate systems satisfying the needs of all people on Earth there is simply no point to waste resources on something that will probably never come to fruition because unless people learn to stop making war on each other there is no future... And the only reason to explore space is as Eric Weinstein put it, constructing the lifeboat...
Aw, don't put yourself down buddy. Start small, I mean, no point in trying g to get to the moon...its a long way and costs a lot... Try something more earthbound to start with... say, the beach...you can work io to the moon later. Enjoy your trip.
I agree with you 100% and I've felt that way for years. Nothing but fake images. We can't leave and nothing gets in here..I saw a video years ago that if course disappeared. The military firing rockets to penetrate the firmament or dome, but was unsuccessful, and what happened next you ask lol nasa was formed...I see it clearly I haven't watched any news or media to cloud my mind for 17 years. You can't land on the moon, or anywhere else. Mars is being constructed right here with people's tax money funding this crap..
There a lot of important things nobody is talking about. The long distances, our need to eat, and drink water to live. There is not enough room in the ship. Also the need to go to the restroom. Where will they do with it all. We need to bath as well. As far as fuel, we need to explore using nuclear energy rather the liquid fuel. Scientifically we are not read for space travel yet.
I used to be into watching space documentries, videos etc. One day however i realized that every single video i had spent watch for hundreds of hours is all FAKE. its all animated garbage. NONE OF IT IS REAL . This video for example is a 1.5 hour cartoon video. Nothing is real in it.
It depends upon which State you're trying to crush. I just read the other day that the land area of the city limits of Anchorage, Alaska is bigger than the State of Rhode Island.
@@aspenrebel I live out west in Idaho. Driving back east is a trip, you can drive through 7 states in an afternoon. I remodeled a hotel in Rhode Island, I have friends that own more land than Rhode Island does.
@@toddnickell6507 You can drive from the upper right hand corner of Rhode Island at the Massachusetts border to the lower left hand corner at the Connecticut border in 40-45 minutes. I heard that Anchorage, Alaska is bigger than Rhode Island. Less time if u go str8 across East to West.
@@toddnickell6507 I don't know that you can drive through 7 States in an afternoon. Maybe 5, maybe 7 in a day. Which States? Hummm??? Maybe if you start in New Jersey at the George Washington Bridge, go across to New York, straight to Connecticut, straight up through Rhode Island, then thru Massachusetts, across the little bit of New Hampshire, then to Portland, Maine. Maybe you could do that, those 7, if you left at noon and got there by six p m. Hit no real traffic jams.
@@toddnickell6507 I know a woman, for 20 years now, .she fled Massachusetts last November 2923 and went to Idaho. I think I read the population of the city is 65,000-68,000. The flatland suburban area increases the population to around 125,000. We have that much population and more in a single suburban city of Boston. The 65,000-68,000 that is.
Your not entirely wrong, most scientists believe worm holes are the way of space travel, but making them and keeping them stable is impossible with our current technology
Cartoons for adults. Should I break it to you people that Santa isn't real? "But we live on a giant spinning ball, everyone knows that!" Sure kids, go find proof. It doesn't exist. But don't cry that your ball is disproven, life gets better when you stop believing lies and begin to know things
@@nukewurld what's your proof you live on an impossible spinning ball? I find people like you fascinating as well...tell me, were granted the divine spark by the creator or are you an AI bot? If you're a human, I'm happy to show you some doors, point out the keyhole, and hand you the key. But you have to want to open that door pal
If u r going to state that none of the planets of our solar system exist....at least explain y u believe that. I have seen the planets through telescopes....seeing is believing.
@@rufusgoldstein2655 Mercury has a shorter and faster obit, while Venus is on the other side of the sun, as Mars it pretty far away so Mercury is the closest
Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter, etc.. ( Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve our future content. A big thank you from all of us.
Mercury doesn't have gravity. It has Acceleration. 107,000 mph vs the Earth's 67,000. That means and probe sent to Mercury must be accelerated an additional 40,000 mph.
Your other mistake is that the sun doesn't have gravity either. Think about it. The sun's mass is equal to 99.85% the mass of the entire solar system. So how can a Jupiter size planet which is .1% the mass of the sun, act on the sun from 100s of millions of miles away.
It can't because mass does not attract mass.
Thumbs down for not understanding something as simple as gravity being an artifact of Acceleration. The Reactionary force in Newton's Laws of motion.
How do we understand you using imperial measurement, 🗑️
Hey squad! If you liked using this AI voice over with AI generated content, we would love it if you bought a length of rope
Still makes me giggle that Ms.Frizzle took her class to all these planets in a single day...ON A BUS!
😃😃
Mm, she did it with the power of children's imagination.
@@JohnLynch-b7e no she did it with the magic school bus cmon bro stay in school😔
Well it's magic of course she could
Plot twist: Ms. Frizzle is an alien and the Magic School Bus is semi-sentient robotic artificial intelligence from her home planet.
Because people like fighting wars better than advancing science, technology, and humanity. Plus there's always the "Glass Dome". 😅
People? You mean the military industrial complex likes fighting wars
"Firmament" 😉
I think it is a lack of interest.
Wars advance science quicker than anything. Look at the nuclear age,radar,jet engines and about a million other things. Remember it was only because of the v2 rocket/bomb we only got to the moon.
War restores survival of the fittest and t
I think it’s more about the money powerful people get from war. Because there doesn’t have to be so many people in poverty or homeless and yet there is. But yall wanna spend the money on space. Most of us including you, will never even go to space. Even if earth was about to get blown up by something huge, we’d be right here about to die while the rich and powerful get tf on in a big space ship.
Back in the sixties, we found the money for space, because we HAD to do everything before the Russians. Now that we don't have any competition anymore, there is no more incentive. 😢
Its the opposite actually.Russians learned much much more and it is helping them to this day.
Safety was also not so strict back then. They took risks that wouldn't go past the discussion phase if brought up today
@@mickeyray3793 China
What’s his name. Eddie Bravo mentioned this. The only motivation left for space travel is a new world order. To unite the entire world against an alien threat. Or to escape our dying planet. Which btw is only dying for us. As good as the earth is at creating life, it’s even better at ending it. 99% of all species that have ever existed, are now all extinct. We are next. I hope the next species after us can treat our planet better. All these global warming, earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes. Is literally the earth trying to get rid of us.
@@mickeyray3793 it’s cause the aliens are already here.😄
ive been to all but Neptunne and Uranus.... with my telescope.. i think the moon is still my fav to gaze at... then Jupiter and its moons... then Saturn... then Deep Space Objects, Orion Nebula, Messier Objects, Andromeda...
Saturn is my favorite to get a good view of.
What kind of scope do you have?
What kind of scope do you have? I'm shopping for one and need an idea 💡 of which to get
I'm actually curious. What scope do you have?
me too, what scope do you have
Still remember being facinated by the black and white photos of venus' suface from venera 13.
Its not hard , it's extremely expensive.
I worked in a shop for many years , customers would have something they needed built or repaired and often asked if it could be done.
I loved the owners reply...
" we can do anything if you have the money "
money means alot to you huh
@@shinski8114 I work a typical 40 hour a week Job , I do it to put food on the table for my family and a roof overhead.
I am in my 50s and started working at 18.
So to answer , Yes , money means alot to me , but truth told it is less important to me than Time. So yes , my time is valuable unlike money I cannot make more I only have so much.
To me the world should come togehter as one and it should t have absolutely nothing to do with money but everything with saving mankind knowing that one day our solar system will die and yes I know it's a long time away but I believe they should start working at it right now to find a way to get people to another place like kepler, but it's sad people can't get o er money and someone wanting to be in charge. Work together
I don't know about everyone else , but my time on this planet I know is limited , in fact it's pretty much the one thing that I have absolutely no way of making more of.
As a result it is the most valuable commodity I own , and as such my time is definitely not free.
Add to that money is much more simple , fits in the wallet , easy to carry around , would way rather use it than have to B.S around and barter with folks like the stone ages.
I know THATS RIGHT MY N''''!😂
This video is a fever dream, I'm pretty sure this is an AI based channel
Correct. It’s nonsensical and stiff. I hate AI voices on stuff like this, and this one is super obvious and has tons of misinformation lol
@@kalen1702 misinformation, such as?
Wild to make such a claim and not back it up.
I'm not saying I'm some expert and can tell you that everything here is correct but I'm very interested to know what is false in this video
if u havent noticed, most of the space videos are fake.. theres no camera in space recording stuff millions of light years away 😂
@@TheFABIOCOOL "fever dream"?
@@matt112fly yeahh yeaahh go believe in talking snakes 😂
I did 18 months in prison without communicating with anyone on the outside. I had no TV or radio but read a lot of books. I could do mars.
I could do Mars.... Happily !
*FJB too !*
Wgaf
Which country was u in? I had more tv stations in jail than what I had at home
Mr. @ral3514 ... Wow, I bet you could.
Lol ..I haven't done prison time but here what ur saying... humans suck totally with ya
In my opinion, we need to solve all socioeconomic issues currently plaguing Earth before we can even _think_ about making the journey to a different planet. We need to become united in our efforts. It can't be the US, Russia, or China alone. It needs to be a combined effort of brilliant minds and brave men all throughout the world.
Thanks for saying what I have been thinking, wish all wars were terminated and humanity could evolve into intelligence
These are both pipe dreams.
Without a big project like a moon base annonced by a main power, nobody will resolve anything, so to wait for everyone (especially todays Western politicians) to get together and decide on sound policies is futile. We need an ambitious space project to get people together and not wait around for political solutions that will never come because the ruling class is only interested in control in order to stay in power.
Earth is all we got, there's no habitual planet within our reach
@@spontaneouz1000-sr6lsso you think we should just give up? Stupid to say such a thing. Did the modern postal system become the new standard if we had just given up? What about getting to the moon? How aboit inventing the wheel or any other significant invention. Anything worth a damn is going to relieve resistance. But that's cause they're jealous they didn't have the brains to come up with the idea themselves.
Orbital mechanics isnt like driving to walmart
Orbital mechanics is, in itself, the least of our concerns, though--living long enough and having enough spare parts and fuel, on the other hand...
I just wanna hop in my chevy and go to Mars. Make it happen!🫵
@@senorpepper3405 we're workin' on it!
Fighting wars is more immediate issue than sending machines to planets that offer no monetary benefit in return
Most people simply don't matter and therefore most wars can be ignored. These "Wars" are irrelevant in our future.
PERSONALLY, I Agree with You!!!😮😊
And Would brig the Cold Water Backet
To "All False Enthusiasts"!!! Sorry Guys
THE JET PROPULTION or RACKET WAS
INVENTED WHEN The Chinese Make
The Gun Powder and Shoot the First FIRE WORKS IN THE SKY!!! NOTHING HAVE CHANGE.... WELL WE Scaled Up a LITTLE😮😅😂😊❤!THE Technology is the SAME! SORRY. 😮😮😮😢😢😢😊😊😊
I have to agree with you... no investment without returns. 😢
It is more beneficial. There is little to no benefit spending a significant amount of money on space exploration. We should keep the budgets reasonable and send probes. Send people, no way. For what purpose? We cannot live there. We will not want to live there. It is a silly dream. People don't even want to live in Antarctica. Antarctica is like a soft summer evening on the beach compared to Mars or the Moon. Just look what happened sending people to the moon. We did it. OK. Now what? Nothing. Over 50 years and we are trying to figure out why we went and the next steps. If we want to work on something work on making the cost of LEO significantly cheaper and easier. Money should be used for health and disease research and helping eliminate poverty in real ways such as clean water, and ample food. Also we could focus on nuclear power.
@@Apistevista war can shape your future...
Next video: Why is it so difficult to walk between the raindrops?
Your problem is one of rate. The raindrops are easily dispatched by running. P.S. the "Tiptoe" method has largely been proven a conspiracy, floated by the late, great Mr. Tim.
Its not , u wait till they hit the ground then you walk on top of them😂
Are you afraid of water?
I would enjoy seeing a video on Triton! I'm not terribly knowledgeable when it comes to the moon systems of the Ice Giants. One day, it would be nice to get some solid orbiters to all the major solar system bodies. Thank you for this video!
God be with you out there everybody. ✝️ :)
I needed to hear that last part, thank you very much
There's a search bar at the top of UA-cam.....you can copy and paste this there: Triton
@@kylebucket I think we all did. Hope you're doing well bud 🙏🏿
It sounds like humans are the equivalent to someone who would like to travel miles across an uncharted ocean to the smallest land point beyond the horizon, while at the same time being barely capable of driving our car to our friends house a town over 😅
😂😂just humans like you. Which is the majority 😢
@@neilrichardson7454 SO RUDE, Im willing to travel any distance as long as your on the same* landmass. Car? Built so much of Toronto but this generation gets rewarded NOTHING.
@@RobzdaBlade thankfully, we'll never colonize or mass travel beyond earth. Outer space bodies are safe from individuals like yourself 😉🙏
@@neilrichardson7454 WHAT? Im the guy who PROTECTS and BUILDS your homes, HUH?! *falls to his knees and looks at ground with disappointment* dude... I gave like 7 years of extreme labor to build your towers... I got a 4 page resume of my skills and work history in Toronto. You REALLY are gonna throw that away? Because of morals? Im 31 man
@@RobzdaBlade merci beaucoup monsieur
Think of it as walking north from the southernmost tip of South America, up the American continents, crossing the frozen arctic by the North Pole, and then walking south through Asia, into Africa, all the way down to the Cape of Good Hope. It could be done, but it ain't gonna be easy.
Sounds good - we gonna be back before lunch lol?
I want more videos like that ...including from Triton...
Tho solar system is so complex...and when you say you know everything than you will know less because there are many things left who can surprise you ....
One interesting thing to consider is "removing" resources from Earth if we do start making bases elsewhere. Obviously this can be offset by collecting resources from wherever we put up bases but surely there would be a significant cost to move those resources to Earth for refining before that infastructure is created at those outer bases.
Weight?
Yes exactly.
Awesome video. Thanks for the breakdown.
..........Why did you leave out half of the main reason its hard to reach mercury.? Yes the sun accelerates your ship but thats not the main issue. The main issue is the absolute insane amount of speed you have to have to get an intercept with mercury when you do a burn from earth orbit. It's a crazy amount of needed delta V. To get to mars only requires slightly more delta V then it takes to get to the moon. The delta V required for mercury is absolutely crazy.
I think we should make a zip line from earth to the moon. That would be pretty damn fun 😂 If that goes good, we will do one to mars too 😂
And the cow jumped over the moon. 😏
Just be sure to make it downhill both ways...
So what happens to the zip line when the earth rotates?
@@aspenrebellmaoo, he didn’t think that through
@@joeybuckets739 I guess not
It always amazes me that we do not know what is on our moon so close but yet we find colourful photos of planets that we will never reach at least with our current technology! Hats off to the photographer, great work indeed but you ain’t fooling me!
We need a moonbase forst to work out the bugs.
Although I would love to see a manned mission to Mars in my lifetime it just doesn't seem feasible. But we are more then capable today to get back to the moon and even set up base stations there, Which is what we should be focusing on as a baby step to eventually reaching Mars and possibly beyond.
we will 😊 and quantum communications will allow realtime video and audio 😊
With The Biden Administration running things...not only won't we Not return to The Moon successfully....we'll be lucky to launch a Rocket into the Sky...and actually hit it !
*FJB !*
NASA said they lost the technology to go to the moon
That's because they never had it to begin with, How do you lose a tech of that caliber ? HAHA, what a joke.@@GodWorksOut
When I heard that NASA lost all the data I thought “How convenient!”
Great vid bro👌
Mercury is relatively uninteresting. Venus is basically hell. Mars is the only real option for the next step of human exploration. It's entirely likely they will send supplies ahead of the manned mission (similar to the Martian). After Mars, moons of Jupiter and Saturn are a must to explore more thoroughly as they are probably the best possibility for life.
I want to go to Pluto.
There's NO possibility of living on any of these celestial objects, it would be easier by a million times to just construct full habitats on the ocean floor, the engineering would be similar except keeping pressure out rather than keeping pressure in... The reasons for doing this would be to try and survive an asteroid strike or solar eruption or supervolcano eruption, because even with one of these phenomena erasing a part of the atmosphere, the under ocean habitat would still be able to be viable with technology creating oxygen from the water.... There is simply no way to create soil on a totally sterile celestial object, and even the grit that is available would be totally unsuitable because of different chemical and isotopic concentrations... An atmospheric low pressure situation would eventually resolve somewhat by water vapor gradually increasing the pressure but that assumes that the sun's output is about the same.... What's really a pity is that these engineering problems could be solved and I'm sure various universities and private programs have people working on such pie in the sky options however, the longer we let governments or rather the corporate conglomerations that control governments waste resources and time and effort and treasure on war and other conflict, the less likely it's ever going to happen......
You forgot the moon to build a space station there would be useful 😊
Why they are all dead planets with ugly environments mars is a baren wasteland
That number alone should slap all dreamers in the face: Earth to mars is like making a million trips to LEO!
People like to pretend that if we didn't spend money on 'defense' there would be lots of money to colonize space. We could spend everything we have trying to put a city up on the moon. For what? Who wants to live there? We have empty deserts and tundra and swamps with no one living in them and they are far easier to live in than living on the frickin moon. People could live on the ocean floor easier. For want purpose should we have people living on the moon? All that is there is dirt. We have plenty of that here.
"We are a tiny part of the vast universe, but we have the power to explore and understand it."
We are many decades from realizing crewed missions to Mars.
If ever…
1-3 years
Oh it's happening, with the extremely lower standards and education curriculum we will definitely get some billionaire version of the submersible Titanic whatever it was.
Not saying they will get out of our atmosphere but they will be classified as crewed missions, probably even sell the seats instead of having qualified people.
I'm 50 and there's no real prospect of manned flight to Mars in my lifetime.
@@pazsion I don’t think so
“You, Lord, in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth,
And the heavens are the work of Your hands. -Hebrews 1:10
Perfectly stated
Rubbish.
Such bullshit.
Fairy tales, written by some of humanities earliest conmen.
lies
Nice 👍 video, Because it's interesting knowing more about our planets ❤❤❤
When you get a chance go on UA-cam and say Earth the making of a planet I'm sure you will enjoy it
ChatGPT: make me a 10-minute video that lasts more than an hour and a half.
👍😃
I love how he said “recently in 2007” like it wasn’t 17 years ago
In terms of the earth's history it's basically no time at all
Lmao
@@ThatGuyAgenbasically a microsecond
I'm still trying to decide if we should even be exploring space. Why? Hear me out... First, we left trash all over the lands of Earth. Then, we trashed up the oceans. Next, we left a crazy amount of space trash floating around our planet. Then, we left trash on our moon. And then, we followed that by crash-trashing nearby planets and not having recovery plans for stuff we've sent there (that will be trash when their missions are over). We literally can't go ANYWHERE without leaving trash behind.
We're just trashy people
Some peoples trash are other people's relics.
That was the generation before us.
That's a lot of trash talking
Messenger had to be slowed down relative to the Sun AND relative to Mercury.
As it fell inwards from Earth, the gravitational potential energy at Earth's orbital distance is converted into kinetic energy, causing the probe to be moving far quicker than an object in a circular (or nearly circular) orbit at Mercury's distance from the Sun. The flybys all slowed the probe.
Gaining and loosing the Delta V seems to be the problem and with the inner planets, Venus and Mercury, you have a lot more Delta V to shed than with Mars.
This is a fascinating futuristic topic, but I think most people would rather solve our pressing problems on Earth first. Unless we’re facing imminent extinction, maybe after fixing our own home, we should start thinking of expanding our presence in space. Some day…
And let’s start with terraforming the Moon first, instead of way more distant and hostile Mars.🌙
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
I don’t appreciate how the writing of this video felt like it was clearly written to be turned into shorts/reels. Every 5 seconds reiterating the subject almost as if you need 30 second spans of time where you explain what we are talking about. Other than that. Great vid
Fun fact. Due to how orbits work, mercury is the closest planet to earth in terms of proximity. While venus is closer in its shortest distance mercury is closer for longer. Thats true for every planet in the solar system...no real reason for saying it I just thought it was interesting
6:19 your example is more complicated to understand than the real thing. Nice job.
we are never going to go to Mars. Can’t even go back to the moon let alone go to Mars.
@@joshbelcher4782 Elon will get us back to his homeland.
Mr. Narrator: Fine voice and clarity of speech, very suitable for science programs. Thank you!
Earth is bigger than Mars wow
In order to get Proxima Centauri in a reasonable amount of time, we would have to probably use multiple propulsion systems. Perhaps a laser sail propulsion system along with an ion plasma propulsion system as an assist, combined with an ultra fast launch speed, not unlike the New Horizons launch.
The laser power would probably work best if in a stationary lunar orbit, similar to geostationary weather satellites.
Just spitballing here, but I think it would be the best solution.
Using multiple propulsion systems, I think we could get our probe(s) there in 35 to 40 years (for making such an ultra long trip, I think it would be best to send a multiple probe craft, where one could go to Proxima Centauri, while another two probes could be sent to the other two Stars, Alpha Centauri A and B. Possibly even a fly by of their planetary systems.
The first encounter with another star, well, actually, multiple star systems, plus exoplanets, would be the zenith of scientific achievement. At least for a while.
Mankind has a tendency to want to top themselves. Which is usually
(I won't go into the ridiculousness of atomic bombs) a good thing.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Why did he say “do you think we will be able to get humans to the moon very soon” after talking about reaching Mars?
Aren't we going back to the moon in 2025?
Because the text and voice is all a.i. generated.
It’s AI generated trash
@@aspenrebel we have never been to the moon
Earth os the easist planet to get to. We had no problems getting in from Uranus. Travel was a breeze 👽
What the h kind of ai generate nonsense is this?!
This is why you record everything from documents mathematics ect when you do space exploration. You never know when you gonna kick the bucket always leave something behind for the next generation to improve upon
gdnordley has a page "going to mars?" Which shows how transit times can be halved with higher delta v capabilities. Taking into account radiation and consumables, likely actual manned transit times will be considerably less that that you get from minimum energy Hohmann transfer orbits. Quite likely half the 257 days such transfer orbits normally take.
Nice, but by far not good enough. Even if you haft the transit times, you still have to wait for 2 years for the next transit window back to earth. Mars is pointless for human conquer. Build a dozen more probes and satellites and be good.
It's March 2024. Starship is flying into space now, carrying 150 tons. We will be going to Mars.
Forget about traveling to other planets; we still haven't found a cure for cancer. That should be the MAIN FOCUS of our species and yet we're too concerned with trivial things like how to make the new i phone more sexy ffs.
We have found a cute but the people who find it gets killed
If the money spent on space went to solving all our problems, we'd still have all our problems and no man on the moon and no space programs. Spce exploration has also done more for modern medicine than you can possibly realise. Case in point the massive computer advancements due to the Apollo programme; it's massive computing power today that is a foundation of cancer research right now.
And unless we get a planet as distant as Mars or Jupiter (nothing no farther) , there's zero percent chance of humanity stepping foot on any habitual planet anywhere in this universe
What if the propulsion systems that will succeed in interplanetary travel are manufactured by: Superior Space Widgets, and you, as an astronaut are sent to Mars on an extended mission to help colonize it. Then the only company that makes the vital components for the spacecraft goes out of business, and the leading scientist, and researcher passes away taking all of his secrets with him?😮😮
It would definitely be a tough situation if the company making the propulsion systems shut down and the scientist with all the secrets passed away. It shows how important it is to have backup plans and share knowledge in space exploration. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Well, hate to say this, something wrong right off the bat, closest to earth is MERCURY on average.
spell check
k that was my thought..?
It’s funny, when you’re a kid and first see the standard illustration of the solar system, you kinda imagine the planets are just like the moon, but only slightly incrementally further away. Like surrounding towns in your neighborhood or state; just means it a long boring car ride, but doable. The scale is just lost on you when you’re young.
My 6yo stepson told me a story the other day about the planets, he said that every planet in the universe has a purpose, he said God made those planets because depending on how you live your life on earth God will send you to one of those planets.
He said that all the bad people are in hell, aka the sun.
He said that he was here before, the first time he was an Indian, the second time he was black and that the bad people made him and his family collect some white stuff that made his fingers bleed (I think he's talking about cotton) and now he's Puerto Rican.
Some people might think all this is made up but you need to realize his only 6yo why would a kid tell the story like that.
He was telling me this thing and ask me if why was I crying and then he started crying with me. I never seen or heard a kid that young tell me a story of a previous life he lived. Creepy, scary, happy, sad, amazing.
Wow
Most likely true and what happens
The first part reminds me of the Divine Comedy
@@streetjustices1706 a 6 year old didn’t tell you all that why do yall lie so much
Fun ELI5 Fact About Chips/CPUs: Satellites are equipped with more robust processors in sets of three that use the common value of two because radiation in space causes a ton of bit-flips. A bit flip is when a binary one is flipped to a zero vice-versa, causing shit like software crashing or a bsod. Yes, this even happens to your computer every single day, better systems exist these days so you are unlikely to know that it has happened.
The reason it happens is because transistors are small as fuck, when they are hit with radiation they can flip, also, we've hit the limit where jumps between transistors make it really hard to find ways to decrease the size and run a stable OS.
From all indication it will be better to send robots that can go to mars and the ground for human.
I am glad that you are presenting this information.
I think the biggest hurdle to interplanetary travel is simply the limitation on speed. Its not like traveling from NY to LA where the distance remains a consistent 2,788 miles.
Because planets orbit at different speeds, a delay of one day could mean tens of thousands of miles difference - a distance that we dont really have the technology to try to make up. Wed be like a dog chasing after a car.
gravity assit can propell faster than a planets orbit... you still need to show up as you get close... so you can slow down and let the gravity pull you closer.
so theres a window of time your planning on.
if we left earth at mars closest point... we would have landed humans on mars in 3-6 months with current tech. in 2022.
itll be another 100 years or so for this to happen again.
I wonder who designed it like that. Perhaps they designed it like that on purpose to show us that we shouldn’t be trying to live on other planets. Is it by chance that our default planet seems to be the best out of the ones that are potentially “accessible “ to humans ? And what are the odds of us finding ourselves in the best place possible for our survival in this whole vast universe? As it is right now, there is nothing that is essential for human survival that has to be sourced from beyond earth . Everything we need is here from water, food, fuel, everything even non essential things like precious metals etc . Life on earth is also self sustaining. Why on earth would you want to leave such an amazing place?
Exploring space for interest in science and knowledge of the universe is ok , but not to seek the next place for human habitation because it is pointless and near impossible.
All we need to do is stop messing up earth, and cherish it like our survival as a species depended on it.
Hi!
1. Don't use our fuel to go on Mars instead use their fuel means use solar rays as (fuel) propelling or maneuvers force to closers as much as possible and Lithium ion for landing and take off.
2. Launch mission in 2 groups (1 active 1 stand by till successful landing) who carries necessary equipments for mission and observation but both groups should fly together one behind other.
3. Make body of mission of solar plates with double cover by metal to reach in space through our fuel and disconnect metal body for further travel through solar system.
This video is a great example of why Neil DeGrasse Tyson's such a singular talent. He would have explained this in about a third of the time in a way that was ten times more interesting.
We know that on the way to Mars the astronauts have to be able to 3D print new parts as needed. That is being tested on the ISS.
For the fuel problem we know how to do it on Mars but the real problem is that NASA doesn't have a way to precisely land on Mars on a specific location, where the automated fuel production system would be located ahead of time, but this is the most feasible way to do it.
Also the Mars spaceship will have to slow down by dipping into the atmosphere called "aero-braking".
These strategies would greatly reduce the fuel requirement, possible cutting it by 2/3rd.
Mercury is closer to Earth than Venus is "most of the time." You even discuss how "most of the time" Mercury is closer than Mars, but yet you can't realize the same is true with Mercury and Venus. Ninety seconds in and not already are the facts wrong, you're pointing out other facts that you think would surprise people, but yet are making the same mistake yourself.
Because everyone for decades has been caught in the pointless loop of saying nobody will launch such a big space effort because we don't have boosters to put up the parts, because nobody will build such boosters because nobody has a use for such big mission payloads because nobody will design such a mission because there are no boosters to lift it.
Yes, for decades, we've heard this.
If there were working competing production lines for SHLV boosters (SLS heavy or Starship or Energia or SaturnV equivalent for ~110tons to orbit are minimally sufficient but still small) we'd be there.
The reason why we don't have bases on the Moon and Mars and other large efforts in space has not been because we lack the technology, or it's too expensive (during the timescale of Apollo, the US spent as much on cosmetics and large States spent more on liquor than we spent going to the Moon). Nor even has lack of public support been reasons stopping it from happening.
It is solely because of a lack of political will and contrary desire by elected and appointed officials: we (or they for us) decided not to go.
Sea Dragon is not quite necessarily the biggest rocket devised.
The later larger version of the Convair Nexus lifted 900 tonnes with a 45 meter diameter payload separation plane.
The later version of the Boeing AMLLV was a 20+ meter diameter SSTO VTOVL (self-landing back onto its launch prep base) for a few hundred tons to orbit. With 12 strap-on solid or liquid 8 meter diameter boosters; 1800 tonnes into LEO.
20:10, how was Starship not included as an option?
Lmaooo starship? Yeah right, it’s doomed to fail. Only delusional Npc bots can’t see how starship is a total waste of time and money
@@Beanskiiii are you an aerospace engineer deeply involved in the development? No? So you're speaking from a position of hubris and ignorance.
@@Beanskiiii Please, enlighten us
This video is at least five years old.
@@andrewworth7574are you??
So what ive learned from this is if you turn left at the shop at 60mph, you reach Mercury. Thank you
because they are luminaries and you cant stand on light...
Have not seen the video yet, but space is really big and our propulsion kinda sucks?
-We never went to the moon.
-We cannot leave this breathable system.
- We cannot go to Mars nor none of those "planets"
We never went to the Moon? We can't leave a breathable system? One feature of social media is that it lets everyone display their stupidity.
Yeah I guess he doesn't realize that his cell phone, telephone communication and TV broadcast. Almost all come from outer space now....
Wouldn't we need to make manny space stations to do this trip in sections? This wpuld mean people would have to be on each station for manny years and always keep them stocked. Can this be accomplished successfully? If so how long would all of this take and what would be the cost? I wpuld love to see this happen
It would be highly interesting but, the problem is utility... As long as there are any governments with corporate systems programmed to make war with other corporate systems to try and gain dominance, man is not ready to go to space....... What for? There are people definitely ready to work on the technical and physical challenges, but without corporate systems satisfying the needs of all people on Earth there is simply no point to waste resources on something that will probably never come to fruition because unless people learn to stop making war on each other there is no future... And the only reason to explore space is as Eric Weinstein put it, constructing the lifeboat...
Because we haven’t even been to the moon😂
And the Earth is flat, all the planets and stars are, they're more like coins than spheres
@@petergriffin383Correct, and there are giant sea monsters in the ocean.
@@aspenrebel Huge one's... easily swallow an entire cruise ship.
You guys just don’t give up huh😂? The earth isn’t flat.
@@randompost4180 yes it is!!!!
Nothing is hard to push against !
NEVER BEEN TO THE MOON, NEVER WILL BE GOING ANYWHERE ELSE
Aw, don't put yourself down buddy.
Start small, I mean, no point in trying g to get to the moon...its a long way and costs a lot...
Try something more earthbound to start with... say, the beach...you can work io to the moon later.
Enjoy your trip.
Me neither…
Well you need to get out and go somewhere.
I agree with you 100% and I've felt that way for years. Nothing but fake images. We can't leave and nothing gets in here..I saw a video years ago that if course disappeared. The military firing rockets to penetrate the firmament or dome, but was unsuccessful, and what happened next you ask lol nasa was formed...I see it clearly I haven't watched any news or media to cloud my mind for 17 years. You can't land on the moon, or anywhere else. Mars is being constructed right here with people's tax money funding this crap..
Well narrated
One would think sending a probe to Uranus would be very difficult on account of the black hole there and all the Klingon's.
Its actually incredibly easy to get to other planets.
The hard part, is coming back, and alive.
There are no planets.
“Be nice to others”😂
I'm going to like this video because you used miles as well as km. Thank you-
Hahaa, never mind the glaringly obvious inaccuracies though right? 😂
I believe we all arrived here from somewhere else and ended up on the rock called earth- that’s why we inhabitants just can’t get along..🤷🏽♀️
There a lot of important things nobody is talking about. The long distances, our need to eat, and drink water to live. There is not enough room in the ship. Also the need to go to the restroom. Where will they do with it all. We need to bath as well. As far as fuel, we need to explore using nuclear energy rather the liquid fuel. Scientifically we are not read for space travel yet.
You can't you can never go all you can do is lie to the mass.
I think it's cool they put that giant bottle opener on Juno
in case any giant beer bottles were encountered 😆🍻🍺
I used to be into watching space documentries, videos etc. One day however i realized that every single video i had spent watch for hundreds of hours is all FAKE. its all animated garbage. NONE OF IT IS REAL . This video for example is a 1.5 hour cartoon video. Nothing is real in it.
Heck, its hard to cross the state for a funeral.
Interplanetary travel must be a lot more difficult.
It depends upon which State you're trying to crush. I just read the other day that the land area of the city limits of Anchorage, Alaska is bigger than the State of Rhode Island.
@@aspenrebel I live out west in Idaho. Driving back east is a trip, you can drive through 7 states in an afternoon. I remodeled a hotel in Rhode Island, I have friends that own more land than Rhode Island does.
@@toddnickell6507 You can drive from the upper right hand corner of Rhode Island at the Massachusetts border to the lower left hand corner at the Connecticut border in 40-45 minutes. I heard that Anchorage, Alaska is bigger than Rhode Island. Less time if u go str8 across East to West.
@@toddnickell6507 I don't know that you can drive through 7 States in an afternoon. Maybe 5, maybe 7 in a day. Which States? Hummm??? Maybe if you start in New Jersey at the George Washington Bridge, go across to New York, straight to Connecticut, straight up through Rhode Island, then thru Massachusetts, across the little bit of New Hampshire, then to Portland, Maine. Maybe you could do that, those 7, if you left at noon and got there by six p m. Hit no real traffic jams.
@@toddnickell6507 I know a woman, for 20 years now, .she fled Massachusetts last November 2923 and went to Idaho. I think I read the population of the city is 65,000-68,000. The flatland suburban area increases the population to around 125,000. We have that much population and more in a single suburban city of Boston. The 65,000-68,000 that is.
Because it's not really real we never an will never go to the moon science fiction lovers star wars star trek
I can’t believe they are still pushing a round planet! Ridiculous Hollywood hype!!
Short answer: other planets are really far and we don't have the technology to build ships that can cover such long distances in shorter time.
Firmament
Which literally mean expanse
Making portals / teleports will solve many issues
True. It's a game-changer
Your not entirely wrong, most scientists believe worm holes are the way of space travel, but making them and keeping them stable is impossible with our current technology
nice cgi in all parts of this video
21:54. Metallic liquid Hydrogen. Those three words, ( together) somehow impart great trepidation
Space exploration before is fake lol
Ok buddy 😂
Close to earth is a relative term . Even the “closest” is crazy far away
Cause you cant get out the FIRMAMENT
Mercury is the mostest closest planet to all planets!!!!
Cartoons for adults. Should I break it to you people that Santa isn't real? "But we live on a giant spinning ball, everyone knows that!" Sure kids, go find proof. It doesn't exist. But don't cry that your ball is disproven, life gets better when you stop believing lies and begin to know things
I still get amazed specimens like you exist
@@nukewurld what's your proof you live on an impossible spinning ball? I find people like you fascinating as well...tell me, were granted the divine spark by the creator or are you an AI bot? If you're a human, I'm happy to show you some doors, point out the keyhole, and hand you the key. But you have to want to open that door pal
@@PhilMilkenson lmao
Would be great if a Briton or Saxon could narrate.
because they don't exist
Then why we can see them from earth
I guess learning wasn't your thing. Stick to colouring in.
@@jayeee2756 discerning was my thing. learning idiotic things wasn't my thing
If u r going to state that none of the planets of our solar system exist....at least explain y u believe that. I have seen the planets through telescopes....seeing is believing.
Believing is seeing
I am not a nerd but Mercury is the closest planet to Earth most of the time
Nerd
Who told you that?
@@rufusgoldstein2655 Mercury has a shorter and faster obit, while Venus is on the other side of the sun, as Mars it pretty far away so Mercury is the closest
all lies
So you are telling me the last planet is just as active as Neptune? And both of them lie beyond Uranus? Cool!