The HORRIFIC Execution Of The BURNED ALIVE SS Officer
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 тра 2024
- SUPPORT OUR BRAND NEW CHANNEL LAUNCHING VERY SOON!:
/ @thefortress
During the Second World War, there were many horrendous war crimes that were carried out by all different armies involved in the conflict. Famously the Nazis carried out some horrendous acts, for example the Einsatzgruppen would follow the Wehrmacht and take the lives of civilians, and it is estimated that they killed around 2 million people. However the SS were responsible for much of the war crimes committed by the Germans, and there was one SS commander who met an incredibly brutal end at the hands of the French Resistance.
Helmuth Kampfe joined the SS and quickly rose throughout its ranks to become an incredibly powerful commander. He saw action on the Eastern Front and was drafted across to France as the Germans prepared for the imminent invasion of Normandy by the Allies. (D-Day) However he was tasked with defeating elements of the French Resistance known as the Maquis in the southern forests. However Kampfe was captured by them and was the highest ranking SS officer captured during World War 2. He was quickly executed by the French Resistance, however was killed in barbaric fashion as he was burned alive inside an ambulance with many other German soldiers.
Following Kampfe's execution, the Nazis and SS carried out a horrific massacre of a nearby village, Oradour-sur-Glane in which almost 700 people were killed in horrific fashion. This was for reprisals for Kampfe's death.
So join us today as we look at, 'The BRUTAL Execution Of Helmuth Kampfe - SS Commander Burned Alive.'
Thanks for watching! Support the channel by subscribing, liking, and sharing.
Follow me on Twitter: / theuntoldpast
Follow me on Instagram: theuntoldpast
Disclaimer: All opinions and comment stated below in the Comments section do not represent the opinion of TheUntoldPast. All opinions and comments and dialogue should discuss the video above in a historical manner.
TheUntoldPast does not accept any racism, profanity, insults, sexism or any negative discussion aimed at an individual. TheUntoldPast has the right to delete any comment with this content inside it and also ban the user from the channel.
As far as I can remember, the officer in command of the battalion that destroyed the town and it’s inhabitants exceeded even the standards of cruelty in the SS. He was formally brought up in charges by the SS and was due to be courtmartialed…but managed to find death in the battles that Das Reich had with invading allied forces in Normandy. I do not believe that his body was ever recovered. His relationship with Kampfe had been very close, the two having fought and survived countless horrific battles against incredible odds on the eastern front together. Diekmann took Kampfe’s death very badly. The destruction of Orador sur Glane, while unacceptable to the SS in the western front, would have been easily overlooked in Russia, where the fighting between the Germans and the Russians was completely devoid of any mercy or humanity. Hence, having been a hard veteran of the experiences of the eastern front, Diekmann would have seen his solution to the death of his friend as, “acceptable” by the standards to which he had grown accustomed to. Allied soldiers in northern France left accounts of the surprising savagery of the close fighting that they experienced with German SS units that had cadres that had spent years fighting against Soviet forces in that theater of war. While I am not condoning Diekmann for his conduct, I wanted to draw attention to how the conditions of war alongside the kind of society that war and militant organizations breed can turn a human being into something less than what we have the capacity to be.
Human life itself is often devoid of mercy and compassion. If you want to survive, arm yourself and learn the ways of combat, ambushes, and dirty fighting. There is nothing wrong with putting out your right hand for a handshake but keeping a dagger or a pistol concealed in the left, ready for use at any sign of treachery or malice.
The cruelty of the SS in France is likely why the US would hand surrendering SS and some Wehrmacht troops over to the wonderful and hard fighting Soviets. Russia knew how to treat a German by keeping them as slave labor until 1955 to rebuild Russia
Excellent point.
That's a very good point that will be lost on most unfamiliar with the savagery of the eastern front. Americans have never experienced such brutal savagery on the scale and capability experienced by the Russians and Germans.
Well said, thank you for your post.
Thank you for these videos!!
Thank you for this upload Dr T
These are the kind of things you won't learn about in history class. Here in the US, the school system is too busy re-writing history instead of teaching it. We must all learn from the atrocities of the past and keep the history alive and so that it is never forgotten and hopefully never repeated. Thank you for this very informative video.
You can learn form history class. Listen to what they are telling you, and then fully do more reseach yourself. Try to get as close as you can to the facts yourself. You may find some of these discoveries unpleasant, especially if the "good guys" have not acted well.
The important thing you have learn from history class is that something did happen. Remember that there is a social bias in each country, and that the school system is caught up in this. When discussing your findings, always be diplomatic and understand that others may be bias and refuse to agree with you. That is OK, and no worth sacrificing respect or a friendship over a disagreement.
As George Orwell said in 1984, He who controls the present, controls the past, controls the future. The Nazi's understood this and so did the Soviets.
Another excellent video. Thank you for shining light onto people and events that might otherwise be forgotten.
I have a notion to second that emotion.
"History deserves to be remembered."
-The History Guy
You may have found it to be 'another excellent video'...however, the entire premise (and title) is almost certainly simply untrue. There's no evidence whatsoever to confirm the idea that Kampfe was murdered and burnt in public. It seems this version of the story was to be used as the defence case at Diekmann's court martial. There's no corroboration from either the SS soldiers present or any French sources that I'm aware of. Perhaps one interpretation would be that Diekmann had been told that his friend had been executed ( by Milice) or other informers...we'll probably never know, but ( I think) it's virtually certain that Kampfe was executed in woodland near Breuilaufa, quite likely, as a resistance reprisal to the massacre of Oradour! Accuracy matters.
Best historical videos on UA-cam. Thank you.
You've apparently never heard of Mark Felton.
Except that this story is wrong!
just like Inglorious Bastards,a true Wienstien.production,aTarentino Oscar for Best Bullshit
@@kevindavis5966 He is also speaking proper English.
Thanks for making this :)
The more I hear about these Nazis, the less I like them.
Yeah, if you're an SS officer you probably had it coming.
Ya this hitler guy sounds like a real jerk
Google Generalplan Öust
You will really hate them after that
@@ericnelson5321 Say what you will.. at least he wasn't a hypocrite
ss members where in most cases executed on site
The French Resistance knew that there would be reprisals, but the sacking and burning of the village and the murder of the innocents was not considered.
To be brutally honest...the Resistance DID know something would happen...it was great for THEIR propaganda...as stated before..they knew what the Germans were like...Das Reich was actually in negotiations with Resistance leaders about a prisoner swap/release..but as stated these Marquis were communist. Also please do not forget..many of these Resistance groups had different motives and often fought against each other..as they did in other occupied territories such as Italy, Greece and Yugoslavia.
Please read for reference Max Hastings book DAS REICH as it is a very involving and sad read and shows not all is as crystal clear as history is often portrayed
What happened at Oradour was horrific but let’s look at the fact here..the Marquis did not give a toss..they buggered off back into the Hills didn’t they? Left the villagers to their fate. So a big responsibility must lay some of the burden at their feet historically too.
@@robertchubb1518 Which is precisely why the Allies never really armed them or kept them up to date on what was actually happening. They were too great a liability and hindrance, rather than any kind of real help.
Walk a mile in their shoes! 🌹
@@robertchubb1518 yes in the sense that if you deal with them then you have to factor in that they will respond wildly disproportionately..even those who resisted in Germany like the White Rose members knew the likely consequences facing an enemy whose only honour was atrocity .
Never heard of this as I'm sure others also were unaware of!
Excellent history!
A lot of nazis were murdered in horrific fashion.
@@oanariscuta83 So what?
@@Bobbydazzlla murder still remains murder, if you kill a bad person their victims don't resurrect.
@@oanariscuta83 It does stop them from killing more people if they escape later doesn't it? My father had to put up with nazi cruelty and I don't have time for people that have no idea what they did. Go off and play with the pixies.
Please see my other posts.. This video presents as 'fact' a version of events that was to be offered as Diekmann's defence at his court martial. There IS still some mystery about exactly where and when Kampfe was killed but it emphaically wasn't in front of a baying crowd of villagers as his body was burnt. This video has some useful and accurate info in it, but unfortunately the entire premise is, frankly, nonsense. A much more accurate and informative account could be found if you searched "In a Ruined State: Chapter 7: An Explanation for the Massacre" I wish the author would take it down or at least explain ths version is NOT corroborated by any witness testimony or any other evidence (from either the German or French present that horrible day ).
New subscriber and what I’ve watched thus far I’m glad I’m here…
This is the first time I have heard of this account.As I know it the reprisal against this village was due to the constant attacks by the French resistance against the SS panzer division Das Reich.It was held up for two weeks in total as it moved up through France to take part in the fighting after D Day.
Das Reich was NOT held up for two weeks by partisans, total rubbish. On June 8 they departed Montauban to the area Tulle Brive Limoges to put down a partisan uprising. This they did by 11 June. 12 June they did vehicle maintenance and departed for Normandy on June 13
@@frankvandergoes298 if the resistance haven’t done a lo5 of damage to the Germans , ho2 come they did their utmost to crush it ?
Das Reich was delayed in getting to the invasion beaches in Normandy. If they chose to do repairs so much the better. They were too late to push the allies out of France. The only military event Das Reich is remembered for is mass murder of defenceless civilians. They had little effect on the allied invasion. They were destroyed by naval gunfire of which they had no defence. Fighter bombers finished the rest off
00°°°°°°°°°°°°
@@derektighe5131 ..they had a morale effect for the German Army in France..you say of of mass murder..please state your facts..when they left the South of France their vehicles were adorned with flowers..Mmmm..the nice places YOU probably like to visit now..Cannes etc...
The Germans were no fools (along with their collaborating French...IN THE SOUTH..The Malice) as to WHO they were dealing with..but the move upto Normandy WAS frustrated...BY..MARQUIS...
Ok..disrupted..but DID the Maquis FIGHT for the local villages in the area?
NO...they attacked German troops..butchered them..and left the villagers to their fate...
Another EXCELLENT contribution from your ever expanding knowledge into some of the unknown details of WW2 and other periods...please keep them coming. It certainly gives lively and (mostly) mature comments and opinions to those just starting to go into depth into this very complicated time in history.
I most certainly look forward to your posts
if so, as a German I can only say that he deserved to die like this. the SS had no mercy for women, children and old people, and they should all have been executed that way.
@@Pyrahna241 well dear boy..although your sentiments would be agreed to by some that are less educated in this war. This is not all black and white...as stated before impartially the SS were by no means saints and part of a regime that cost the innocent deaths of millions. However please look at what you have said/stated...”they should all have been executed that way” You have grown up in a Federal State that since the war opposes the death penalty. Also by your own words you are no better than those SS men that showed “no mercy for women, children and old people” In fact with this type of sentiment your words and therefore. Your thoughts are of the same mind as an SS man.
The Allies fought this war under the guise of freedom for ALL people and that includes justice..where was the justice in the murder of these men? It made the murders no better than the SS men they were butchering
Please look at the link attached...I do not agree at all with the Nazi ideology and with this I hope we can all agree..however..one mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist..so in the modern age of the 21st Century..we have this happening. ISIL see this man..this pilot as their arch enemy and do this to him..do you agree or not agree with this burning? If you agree..then what I have said about you being an SS man in thought is correct..If you do not..then you are incorrect in your first statement that this SS man and the others that were burnt with him and “should all have been executed that way”
The correct way would have been to put them on legitimate trial...that is our way..the legal way and it is YOUR Federal way..
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muath_al-Kasasbeh
@Philip Carpenter warum sie gnädiger behandeln als sie es ihren Opfer zugestanden haben? Gut, verhungern lassen wäre noch eine Option.
@Philip Carpenter TRANSLATION....”yes, it would have been sensible, but much better we should take the somewhat higher moral ground and just shoot them”
@@robertchubb1518 People like you would have encouraged the Nazis to kill even more people. Small resistance groups cant start prison camps in occupied territory. LoL, its like all your comments seem to be focused on "allies also bad" or "lets not bring too harsh treatment on the perpetrators of genocide". You are sus as hell.
Let's have some context here ...Kampfes unit days before hanged over a 100 innocent men at Tulle..Kampfe had and would have treated the Marquis in the very same way
Agreed - although it's worth adding that the Tulle atrocity was apparently fuelled by the Germans discovering 40 of their own men who'd surrendered being found massacred and mutilated by resistants the previous day (with their testicles cut off and stuffed in their mouthes). A horrific tit-for-tat ensued between the Germans and the resistants, and tragically it was the innocent French civillians in Tulle, Oradour-sur-Glane and innumerable other villages and towns in France who payed the price.
For the addition to the record also: Kampfe was probably not held in or about Oradour-sur-Glanes (the site of the terrible massacre of nearly 700 French people) as stated here, but in or near the village of Oradour-sur-Vayres which was some distance away. So the SS didn't even get the 'right' (not the right word I know) village to take vengeance upon. On such twists of fate do such horrors happen.
Sad that Europeans were killing their brothers on either side. Sheer madness that we as the closest genetically and culturally of any people on earth would turn on our people.
@@luisromanlegionaire
Dude...thats nothing new.
European history is filled with constant wars.
We shouldn't be suprised about the fact that we are a global minority.
The Maquis was never announced a fighting Force at the Red Cross at Geneva (like i.e. the "Volkssturm" was). So they were treated like "armed Civilists". That means in an occupied (and surrendered Territory since 1940): Kill at sight. All according to Hague Convention.
No one is saying it wasn't deserved pal.
Nice job on this video. Thanks.
Thank you for sharing this piece of history. Stories like this need to continue being told so that maybe one day the world will realize nothing good ever comes from war.
Seek out the foreign movie "Come and See" about the massacre at Oradur-sur-Glane, it pissed me off when I watched it
You are the first I know of who has explained why the massacre at Oradour occurred!
And it’s not consistent with other’s opinion, don’t take as gospel.
the holocast never happend but massaceres like this happend, but they where with rreason and afterwards many times punnished or court marshelled as said here
war isnt black and whtie good guy bad guy
Partisan wars are always brutal. Whether ww2 or Vietnam or Afghanistan or even the American west. The usual horrific standards of “normal” combat are often suspended as both sides feel no need to show any mercy.
yes they don't even have the facilities to take prisoners. It was still very barbaric but their land was getting invaded so there's no good guy in this situation. The SS using the population as hostages was equally disgusting.
It was civilians vs the invading German army, there was no standards of “normal” especially from the notorious SS.
IF any lessons are to be learned from history is, don’t serve fascist, racist leaderships and participate in their invasions and never ending wars. Dictators, demagogues need the people to fight and die for them.
Right now am looking at the United States and it’s oil, gas and weapons billionaires that push for never ending wars.
@@AdmiralBison It was ARMED civillians(partisans) vs the german army, the geneva convention rules of engagement does not applies to ARMED civillians so it is only natural that common war standards wont be abided by both sides in a guerilla war. But the germans razed a civillian town only for reprisals is certainly a war crimes indeed. The germans didnt found any partisans so they make "examples" by mass murder a village. The partisans knows that they wont be the one suffering but the innocent civillians will, yet they keep on going. Yeah C'est la guerre, every sides has their own monsters.
Retaliations are always justified.
@@umarb7325 No! disgusting was partisans’ behavior! They knew the consequences of their action.
WWII was so horrible on so many levels. Can you imagine, with modern weapons, even if non-nuclear, how horrible a third world war would be? Humanity has not evolved since WWII, and is even worse in some ways. There would be similar atrocities but probably on a much larger scale.
It's time to get rid of nukes. They're not good for anything.
WW3 started in 2020, it's just not a war of bombs and bullets.
@@joeker7240 Wow, what bullshit. The USSR/Russia disinformation plots have been going on since the 50s.
@@adamf663 I agree.
I am sorry to say you are right.
There were HUNDREDS of villages in Belarus ,Russia and Ukraine,what ended up destroyed like this.Let this sink in.
As depicted in the movie, “Come and See.“
@@dennisyoung4631 This movie is heavy stuff.
In Serbia as well.
That is an absolutely vile way of murdering someone. However, the SS did that on a large scale to innocent citizens, so, though I disagree with with it, I can understand why it was done. 'So as you sow, so shall you reap'.
'So as you sow, so shall you reap' that goes both ways
exactly...the majority of people are so dumbed down with hollywood movie idea about ww2
Ehh, he probably suffered a heart attack and died right away
I guess u can call it: eye for an eye
Two wrongs don't make a right
Maquis is pronounced MAH--KEY.
THANK YOU!!!!
I'm glad I'm not the only person that noticed.
When I watch such documentaries that mispronounce basic French or German spellings; ex. Luftwaffe pronouncing German W as if it were English W or French QU as KW ex. Question - Kwestʃn instead of Kestjõ ; I think a little less of the documentary as the creators have not done their homework. I do not "subscribe" to such work.
Actually maquis must be pronounced MAH KEE.
Na , na , na ,it’s pronounced Mar Qizzzzzsss 😂😂
Imagine a Scotsman trying to open his door but drops the key,he shouts "MA KEY"!
Agreed - never heard it pronounced 'Ma-kwee' before.
Yup I'm Scottish it's ma key
The irony is that 28 years earlier the British Black and Tans were doing the same acts of reprisals against Irish men, women and children every time they were attacked by the IRA.War brings out the worst in mankind and no side comes out smelling of roses.
This village appears in the very first episode of "The World at War"
I didn't realise it was a reprisal for the death of this character.
I thought it was Nazis frustration and revenge for the Normandy Landings.
Thank you. 👍
True, didn't realise it was reprisal of Helmut's assassination.
I'm sure they didn't leave that info out on purpose...
@@kaalvoetpiet3442 Absolut!
Down this road on a summer day in 1944, the soldiers came. Nobody lives here now. They stayed only a few hours. When they had gone, the community, which had lived for a thousand years, was dead. This is Oradour-sur-Glane, in France. The day the soldiers came, the people were gathered together. The men were taken to garages and barns, the women and children were led down this road, and they were driven into this church. Here, they heard the firing as their men were shot. Then they were killed too. A few weeks later, many of those who had done the killing were themselves dead, in battle. They never rebuilt Oradour. Its ruins are a memorial. Its martyrdom stands for thousands upon thousands of other martyrdoms in Poland, in Russia, in Burma, China, in a World at War...
Yes it was an interesting piece of information BUT I somehow get the vibe from some of the comments that this would justify the massacre. It certainly doesn't. Communists who have infiltrated the Resistance murder an SS- general _near_ Oradour-sur-Glane, and in reprisal the SS massacre everyone living in the whole village, including children. Not any more justified than before, because they punished the wrong people and out of proportion.
I'd hardly say he didn't have it coming. Germans didn't seem to realize there'd be a day of reconing for their actions. Any French military, marquis, or civilian who had the chance automatically executed any SS troops they captured, regardless if they surrendered or not.
For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.
Hosea 8:7
Funny that the germans were blamed if they execute automatically a guerrilas...but the guerrillas( maquis) are automatically justified if they execute automatically a german soldiers.
@@samkangal8428 Perhaps it could have something to do with the fact that the Germans were operating in many countries that didn't belong to them, yet they were forcefully occupying them.
@@av5958 Yes, but the Maquis had not invaded someone else's country and killed innocents. The Germans had. Huge difference.
@@samkangal8428 I'm not sure I follow your logic there. Do you mean the occupied countries were rightfully the Reich's property?
Thank you.
thank - you .
Love the content I am fascinated by history especially WWII
Me too. I find history endlessly fascinating.
SS Das Reich massacred Oradour but, I never heard it was because of
H. Kampfe
many Nazi/German reprisals were a resualt of some horrible actions commited against them.the allies working with the underground had teams with S/W radios who arranged staged road blocks thus stalling German columes and called in airstrikes on the Germans causing casulites and loss of many vehicles,with noway of striking back ecept for FLAK the troops got extremly angered by such actions ,so it's nowonder how such repricles could happen horrible as they were .
Because you are never told the truth about what really happened. I was stunned when I discovered the truth.
That’s because we get a watered down version of history The communist resistance knew the Germans would retaliate with executions but they didn’t care about local civilians Nothing new there I guess
@@Ned-ke3ui ...Italy experienced the same : even "white" partisans killed by "red" partisans
Probably because it wasn't...I've studied this for many years and this is the first I've heard of it....it would have been a completely idiotic thing for the Resistance to do.
My information is that Kampfe was shot, then the body fed to the pigs. This came from one of the Resistance fighters involved.
thank you
Must have been terrifying to be a civilian with these monsters stomping about in your country knowing that you might be dragged off and shot as a reprisal for one of their own pigs being assassinated.
I can't stress enough how Liberals should arm themselves.
Well, being dragged off and shot is actually quite humane in this context.
SS-Gruppenführer Heinz Lammerding the commanding officer in charge of the 2nd SS-Panzer Division 'Das Reich' the unit which was responsible for the Oradour-sur-Glane and Tulle atrocities, was never punished or put on trial for his men's actions for these war crimes.
I was wondering what happened to them. That's really too bad. They should all have met the same end after the war. That is the only sure fire way to prevent events like this.
The reason Lammerding and other officers in the 'Das Reich' division weren't punished for their atrocities at Oradour-sur-Glane and Tulle was because they were killed days later in the fighting around Normandy.
They actually torched the wrong town to boot.
@@moistmike4150 Lammerding wasn't killed in a battles.After the war he lived in W Germany.So the only reason for not punishing was that he wasn't guilty.
Lammerding, prior to commanding 2SS Das Reich division was the Executive Officer for 3SS Totenkopf Division.....he not only approved of the Massacre,he encouraged his men to brutality. Oddly enough, the unit involved in the massacre was actually from the Alsace Lorraine....a German speaking region of France.
After the war ended, the French government attempted to see Justice done but most of the sentences given to the soldiers involved with mere slaps on the wrist...
I heard about the French village the WSS burned down (and murdered everyone alive in it). But never about the officer the maquis executed. As all murdered German soldiers were revenged as part of the nazi scare tactics, the destruction of the village makes much more sense now. It was an overkill, but definitely in line with practices already in place. Good video.
essentially state terrorism
Except it didn' happen..certainly not like this video says. See my other posts for the full story if you're interested? But, essentially, this narrator has presented as 'fact' a highly contested and , in my opnion, outright false narrative. There's NO evidence to suggest that Kampfe was executed and burned in front of a baying crowd! This would have been unprecedented behaviour from the resistance who would have been painfully aware of the reprisals that were routinely exacted by the nazis, all over France, in that period. No witnesses on either side ever testified to support this version of events. A version that was to be presented as Diekmann's defence at the court martial he was due to face. The resisitance said that Kampfe was executed ,in a forest, in response to the atrocities at Oradour sur Glane. The internet is a fantastic resource but this video is dangerously misinforming (for whatever motivation / reason)..
@@timotimo4152 i don't think they give them the trouble to burn someone alive. A bullet is faster and gasoline was rare.
@@timotimo4152 sorry Timo but the actions at Oradour came AFTER the attack by the resistance on German soldiers!Get your facts straight!
@@malemesjager41 The Oradour massacre did indeed come after Kampfe's capture. That's not an argument. However Kampfe (almost certainly) wasn't executed until AFTER the massacre and CERTAINLY WASN'T burned alive in front of crowd of baying villagers.. and his body was never found by German forces. That is factually incorrect.
My facts (as far its possible to tell from the evidence) are straight.. your comprehension probably isn't. The title, the whole premise of this video is utter bollox. Yet pompously presented as fact by an amateur historian.
Just to let you know, Maquis is pronounced 'mackee'.
he also miss pronounced Barbarossa
Yeah, mispronouncing it wouldn't be as hard on the ears if he hadn't repeated it over and over. Worth checking a new word before using it, if you've never heard it before.
I’ll give him a pass on the Maquis pronunciation.
Yeah I didn't make it all the way through and this was one reason why. Part of the research for something like this should involve researching how words and names are pronounced.
Yeah, but you have to acknowledge his wilful disregard for most words over three syllables ...
I've been to this village. They built a memorial underground so as not to disturb the remaining village. It was sad to look at the list of names and see infants listed. My book only says the men were shot, not burned. I'll have to double check.
They were shot, not burnt alive.
@@maram6211 they were shot in the legs and then burnt alive
@@vlp92 False.
@@maram6211 According to a survivor's account, the SS men then began shooting, aiming for their legs. When victims were unable to move, the SS men covered them with fuel and set the barns on fire. Only six men managed to escape. One of them was later seen walking down a road and was shot dead. In all, 190 Frenchmen died.
@@vlp92 Fabricated.
Am I right in stating that 'The History Guy' has documented this atrocity too? The single survivor and the church window definitely rings a mental bell.
Something like that happened in Belarus too
Yes he ripped him off clearly. Used the same images as well
So that’s why it was done. I saw this village on the the TV show World at War….and I never forgot it.
'World at War' was good for its time, but it's now incredibly lame compared to UA-cam documentaries like 'TheUntoldPast'. Modern UA-cam docs give far more detail and explain reasons for things in a much better way.
Don' t forget Hiroshima and Nagasaki and Dresda!
@@mihaelaboros8866 you reap what you sow .
@@mihaelaboros8866 The USA Nazis!
@@chipschannel9494 -------------- This is exactly what will happen after today's neo-Marxist sowing.
I've visited Oradour - a very sobering experience.
Same....the church there....wow.
Very..but look at the reason WHY it took place..
John has a long mustache 🙂👍 Radio signal to maquis right before D Day?
Unfortunately in wartime it becomes the old dog eat dog mentality.So many horrors occur on both sides,just terrible times.So sad to hear ...😪😪
One word for this whole thing: SAVAGE
What hole? You digging a “hole thing” somewhere??
@@bobbythomasfarley521 whooops...
Tengo un amigo - wolf- que su padre era un ofial de las SS. Perdió un brazo sobre un tanque en Stalingrado. Era un tipo rancio, de hecho Wolf prácticamente vivía en mi casa, no tenia madre. Ir a su casa daba miedo porque estaba decorada al uso. Se trajo hasta los uniformes negros con calaveras y la casa llena de banderas, fotos y medallas. A su hijo lo trató de hacer un SS pero Wolf pasó. Esta gente no cambia. Talibanes del pasado... que miedo
Argentina?
@@raleighcassada7602 Buena suerte, y a estaba la Armada Roja, para estas personas!
Should have turned him in..
@@raleighcassada7602 Typical if so..
When you are a partisan, it is best not to go up against combat troops, who are used to responding immediately with every weapon available.- Das Reich veteran on the massacre. There can be a big difference between combat troops and occupation troops.
Germany might have been better off using allies, Hungary, Romania, Italy, as occupation troops. All were considered poorly equipped, poorly trained, poorly led and with few exceptions inadequate as frontline combat troops.
More than combat troops the SS from Das Reich division had become killing psychopaths. They had just been transferred from the Rússian front where in their war against partisan units they burned and ravaged 624 villages in Byelorussia now Belarus, in the same fashion as Oradour locking all inhabitants in barns and burning them alive. They had become savages like Attila the Hun degenerates
@@bernardlucas3954 with all due respect to your right to an opinion I must put in a word for Attila and his horde of savages as you call them. . They conducted war according to their rules, policies, traditions. The SS can be called degenerates because germany claimed to be superior to Asiatic barbarians such as Attila and it violated the Geneva Conventions although these seem to have been more in evidence after the war at the war crimes trials than during the war in the actions of Axis and Allied forces. Ever considered why there were so few Japanese POWs taken by USA troops? Some high ranking USA officers claimed the policy was to kill prisoners because they had no means to safely imprison them while taking various islands in Pacific theater. SS were notorious for their treatment of captured military and partisans especially on Eastern Front but also in Western Europe, ie Battle of the Bulge, Malmedy. BTW why do you differentiate "combat troops" from SS? They were for the most part combat troops. Granted they were a part of the NASDAP rather than the German Army proper .
@@dickvarga6908 SS were soldiers like Wehrmacht troops perhaps the best soldiers on the field. Retaliations were and are lawful whose blame is to be given the partisans. Partisans were bandits and they deserved to be executed as soon they were captured. Always and everywhere this rule is to be applied by each regular army.
@@silverfletcher2560 Who told you that? Waffen SS was sure not like the Wehrmacht. Waffen SS was super elite and super cruel. Most of them were murderers, rapist and psychopaths. They where even hated by the Wehrmacht soldiers.
"Heer" referred to the German army. "Wehrmacht" referred to the German armed forces in total, the Luftwaffe, Kriegsmarine and the Heer (but not the Waffen SS).
It is Wehrmacht(=defence force), not ... archt.
@@paddyseamair6336
Typo, I corrected it.
We need more of this videos to remind us now soft and well fed people that war games are NOT games.. we’re getting way too complacent about divisions that getting deeper in our society, and if we think it cannot happen again - than we deserve what’s coming for us!
It’s not that it can’t happen again but people around the world remember how brutal WW1 & WW11 were. So I think most will do whatever it takes to avoid a 3rd world war.
Oh its going to happen unfortunately. We have strayed way to far and now the population is at its sharpest divide in modern history. Both sides are calling for the others removal from society. This can and will only lead to one devastating outcome...
uhh... these exact things continued to happen after WW2 and still do all over the world.. humankind is self-destructive and deserves to be wiped out as it serves ZERO purpose.
ua-cam.com/video/AC_x2lKIPXE/v-deo.html
@@floatpool8307 We have the nuclear deterrent now. The bigger concern for me is the way the masses flock toward totalitarianism every time they're afraid. It seems much more likely society will collapse on its own with no need for another world war
In the light of day on June 9, Das Reich took stock of the situation in Tulle. Forty men of III./95 were discovered dead near a school. They showed signs of execution, and local civilians reported the men had been killed after dropping their weapons and surrendering. Only an SD officer with them had a pistol in his hand. Most of the bodies were mutilated, some had had their genitals cut off and stuffed into their mouths. Others had been covered with excrement. One man had holes in his heels with a rope through them, and a ruined face, indicating that he had been tied to the back of a truck and driven around. Other bodies were found around town, bringing the total German dead to 64. The III./95 had reported 80 missing, meaning several were unaccounted for. And 9 more Germans died in rescuing the garrison, as mentioned before.
3:58 Winner of the “Most French” picture award of WWII
Unless Star Trek DS9 was lying to me, Maquis is pronounced Ma-key not Ma-kwee :)
Island Britishers are so cute.
They were in Star Trek Voyager too, the Maquis(Ma-key) haha
It grates on me like fingernails on chalkboard
... and Marquis is pronounced "Mark-us", not "Mar-kwus". Go ask the Romans.
Some of the attempts at pronouncing Cracow grate a little...and a good job the word Sowjet has been translated too.....
Many ordinary French people - including my grandmother - feared the murderous acts of the Maquis which didn't shorten the war by 1 minute but led to the deaths of thousands of innocent French civilians in retaliation.
Even the Normans HATED the Allies for what they did in bombarding villages..look at what they did at Caen? They turned that into a mini Cassino
The Maquis was responsible for giving the allies intelligence and sabotaging german communications that helped the allies greatly during D-DAY.
So take your historical revisionism somewhere else please the communication blackout caused significant delay for the germans during d-day.
You say that like the Nazis wouldnt have killed people if they met no resistance. The group that were running kill squads against civilians on the Eastern front as a SOP and were also using concentration camps to kill 11 million people mostly Jews, but also people they didnt like like people on the left, people with downs, gay people etc etc. The NAZIS killed thousands of innocent people, not the French resistance.
Unusual vocal inflections.
SS officer burned alive? Sounds fine to me.
Yeah that's probably one of the better ways to deal with those adorned with swastikas and Totenkopfs.
Poetic justice haha
So..no matter your feelings..you agree that a Jordanian pilot being burned was justified? May I remind you..this was carried out in the 21st Century
One persons oppressor is another’s freedom fighter..
@@formalbug5716 You have no idea..read the history..PLUS..you applaude the burning of a soldier that (should) have been accorded the rules of The Hague Convention...?
I don’t believe you can show an execution that is not brutal. No matter if the victim was guilty or not.
Maybe on the dark web.
What
This is true but I assume you agree that some monsters have it coming
Executions are brutal, mainly because the recipient knows it is coming. There are all kinds of monsters, some live among us and some don’t
I am not saying one way or another about someone or something deserving execution. There are some people I personally love to shoot the death at a hundred feet with .22 shorts because they deserve it. That does not make it less brutal.
I'm sure there is a video on this channel about Reinhard Heydrich's death , and the reprisals that took place afterwards
I was thinking the same thing. I lost a great aunt and great uncle and second cousins on my mom's side in the massacre at Lidice in what is now the Czech Republic after that monster was rightly assassinated.
There is a 'Timeline' video on UA-cam about the killing of Heydrich and what the Nazis did Before, During and, After his well deserved death, to the people of Czechoslovakia. Savagery would be too kind a term to describe it.
Burned alive was too good a punishment
How can this be considered brutal when compared to the million who suffered under the NAZIs .... there is no apology for such EVIL.
Every death is on an individual basis. All nations in World War 2 committed vast scale genocidal activities. The Germans aren't responsible for even 20% of murders, civilian casualties, and executions in World War 2.
It was still brutal, because he suffered severe pain before death. That was the whole idea of it after all.
Hello, thank's for this. But question: between the 3 pictures "of Helmut Kempfe" one doesn't seem to be of him (the one where he's seen by profile). Are you sure of it's origin ? Thank's for your answer.
If you're referring to the photo at around 3:28 then yes, that is most definitely Kämpfe. Left to right are Kämpfe, SS-Sturmbannführer Ernst Krag, SS-Obersturmbannführer Albert Stückler and commander of the 'Das Reich' division SS-Gruppenführer Heinz Lammerding.
Marquis.
Thats what the "resistance group" called themselves on Star Trek voyager.
The French resistance were big trekkies...
I think it's Maquis, no "r"
if I remember correctly I think 1-2 of the cast members actually served in WWII so this makes sense
Maquis: pronounced Makee. But great video!!
Ah so this is the video I was looking for.
never heard the story of this man being executed as the catalyst for the town being burned down.
Yes, news to me, too.
I'd heard about it as there is a fair amount of detail in the book by Max Hastings about the march of the Day Reich from southern France towards Normandy. I don't recall if there was mention of the burning of the Germans. I guess I'll read it again.
Neither have I. If true then you can understand the hatred that ensued, he was a brave and popular officer and it is understandable that his brutal murder would provoke such a reprisal.
There was no need to kill in this manner. Even if there was no alternative, for example handing them over to the Allies as prisoners.
@@dp-sr1fd Umm, no,,,murdering a town of men women and children is not justified.
@@BUSTER.BRATAMUS I did not mean justified, you are right in that. I meant understandable. His soldiers had been hardened by years of fighting in partisans in Russia and that French partisans must have known they would take terrible revenge for the brutal murder of the German prisoners. Like Tito's partisans they did not care about reprisals on civilians.
thank you very much. Little error at 1:50. The Heer (Army, ground forces) is not known as the Wehrmacht. The Wehrmacht englobed all branches of armed forces of the Third Reich.
I got a firepit commercial. Solostove really on top of their advertise game.
good info
Important to have access to these horrific stories….otherwise how do we learn??!!!
Vengeance ALWAYS destroys!
when the war ended they should have taken every last member of the ss and machined gunned them, they were all butchers.
The village massacre was featured in the opening sequence 1st episode of the World at War documentary.
Your channel is very good carry on the good work 🙂👍
Sir Ian Shawcross, British Chief Attorney at the Nuremberg trial, wrote 20 years later a book about the missing
judgement about other war crimes beside the Germans! His book was never translated in German and it was
not allowed to edit it in the Federal Republic, did you know that? Its another untold past, isnt it?
Probably don't publish it bc they want to instill a guilt complex in German students
@@a.f.7246 not in students only, all German folks, the whole people live in that psychopathological circum=
stances, since several centuries 97 o98% of my fellow citizens miss their mental health, thats why I
feel so lonely cause I belong to the 2 or 3%, and it seems to me to meet every day two or three
of my sick fellows, cause they dont know anything about the reeducation program of the Angloamericans
since the end of the 30yars-war ended 1945!
Just imagine if this constant brutality was not accomplished. Work for GOOD.
Moral of story: Dont fuck with Nazi's.
Nice job
Shocking. I had read about the razing of Oradour-Sur-Glane 30 or forty years ago and knew that the commander of the SS troops ordered a reprisal for the kidnapping of a German officer. As I recall the fate of the officer was not revealed even though NOW I believe the writer of the book knew exactly what happened.. As a large part of the book covered the trial the author had to know what the officer commanding the detachment, Adolf Diekmann, testified to at his trial about recovering the burned body. I don't think that is a lie. Many of the unit's soldiers were tried after the war but amazingly enough the French were stymied by the fact that a large number of the soldiers were Alsatians and nominally French. Alsace changed hands many times and it was not politically expedient to try, convict, and execute French citizens. Even after all this time I distinctly remember the name of one of the Alsatian Sergeants, 'Hascha Kurtz' as the name seemed very unusual to me. I'm not at all surprised by the behavior of the Communist Maquisards. They were unusually bloodthirsty and this wasn't the first reprisal that they provoked. I don't know what they were trying to achieve but they were likely trying to kill two birds with one stone inflicting casualties to the Germans and destabilizing and terrorizing the country sufficiently to enable a Communist takeover.
Take a look at communist French involvement in the fall of France.
Stalin ordered cooperation.
¹¹¹¹¹
I do share your view !!
In Middle Age every besieged town which didn’t surrender, was razed to the ground and people killed. That’s the rule in wartime. Nothing new under the sun.
You are correct i read an account of this back in 1973 , the subject of the burned handcuffed ss corpses in the ambulance being raised as the rationale for Oradur , BUT was presented not as a confirmed fact but as an unconfirmed story.
I suspect that the truth was seen to detract from the public image of the Marquis, and the communists during the war.
The West STILL has not come to grips with the fact that Stalin helped to put Hitler into power and assisted him to train his army in the Soviet Union, as Stalin intended to use him to start a rerun of WW1, and when Germany and the British and French were economically and militarily exhausted , to invade Europe successfully in a rerun of their failed attempt to do so in 1919.
Stalin knew exactly what Hitlers plan for the East was, but he expected a long drawn out war in the West, Stalins plan failed when Germany won a quick victory over the French and British, which left Hitler free to attack the Soviets
something that Stalins risky strategy had not anticipated.
The SS reprisal was covered in the "The World At War" tv series.
I was always told that Germans burned the village but never had heard this part of the story that what started the whole thing. Its good to know both sides of the atrocities. We humans are a disgrace..
I guess you had to be there, before y'all can pass judgement.
Execution of an SS officer is a bit different than the execution of non combatant women and children.
What was the purpose of executing him didn’t they know that a reprisal would take place? Was he worth it for al those poor women, children and men that were killed in retaliation?
You are soooo right. WE would have gotten him anyway. Your last sentence speaks volumes.
Your asking the guy who put this nonsense together? He can't even get the number of Jews correct that Hitler murdered. I wouldn't ask him shit. He's wrong about a lot of things. He's a idiot
What would you do if your country was taken over in a similar situation by an Evil of this magnitude? What would you do if you knew for a certainty that certain groups of your fellow countrymen & women were destined for extermination and, that the rest of the population would be used as slave labor? What would you permit knowing that you had no rights any longer? Best to think about what happened to the area of Germany that fell to the Red Army - the consequences of killing, murdering, exterminating 26 million Russians were repaid in kind. The SS had acquired a reputation long before the outbreak of war for savagery and brutality - what they did subsequently made their prewar conduct look like the Vienna Boys Choir.
@@fawltyoldboybasil.2178 not sure if your message is anyway related to what I posted. When the partisans captured the ss officer the allies had landed in Europe so the end of the reich was in sight. All they had to do was keep him prisoner until the end of the war then execute him but instead they burnt him alive which resulted in the retaliation and murder of children and women.
Then surrender to evil
Maquis is pronounced as Ma-Key, not Ma-Kwee.
I agree.
I own an imported left hand drive Mercury Marquis Coupe.
Another complainer, go make your own videos then.
Out of the whole informative video of this bleak and terrible time of human history this is what you notice and bothers you then gives you an overwhelming compulsion to comment on!!
@@heyitsedz1785 Unbelievable remark ! The Maquis along with other freedom fighters during the 2nd World War played a significant role is bringing an end to the Nazis and if it wasn`t for them, the War would have lasted a bit longer. We owe them our respect by at the very least pronouncing their titles correctly whether you`ve of their politics or not.
I cannot believe i`m having this conversation, its pathetic.
Regardless of how his name was pronounced he made a big mistake in publicly executing these Nazis, getting the entire village wiped out. This was 4 days after D Day. He thought the war was won, but he was wrong!
One of my favorite leaders of the Maquis was Commander chakotay ;)
🖖😂
RO LAREN AS WELL. NANO. NANO.
I loved his tattoo.
Isn't that Rick Astley?
The barbarity of mankind is unmatched in all of nature.
Maquis is pronounced ma-kee, not ma-kwee.
Well it is pronounced that way here
Very cringe indeed videos are great though!
Really? Does it mAke difference? It's the educational profile that is important.
@@j1st633 Yes. It does make a difference. But it's kind of minor as the overall story is the main focus.
@@johnmn3500 Kentucky?
So he basically got a preview of what awaited after death for him? :D
People still believe in this heaven/hell nonsense?
@@elite1361 allegedly so...
@@elite1361 we will all know for sure after we die. If I am right, it will be fantastic for eternity for me and eternity of pain for you. If you are right, we are both worm food and it doesn't matter. In other words, there is no real downside for me either way. For you, the best you can hope for is to be worm food. Have a great day.
Roosevelt and Churchill both met him there...
@@fredbecker607 pasquals theory... classic. But yea your forgetting aboht the other 999 possibilities, let's just hope for your sake you picked the right one!
I have visited this village a couple of times, really sad story.
That's good Peter we're are You frome?
@@fredygonzalez6104 the name Visser is Dutch, but he could also be from South Africa. Many people here in SA. with the name Visser. A common Afrikaans name.
@@roybean7166 that's interesting Roy Bean
Good video despite the minor errors.
I have heard the story of Orador before but never the executions of the German prisoners before the civilian massacre.
Probably because it’s bollocks.
@@AnEnemy100 quite possibly
Repent to Jesus Christ!
“Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for you.”
1 Peter 5:7 NIV
J
The French commies started started it all. It's they who are ultimately responsible for the terrible deaths of the Oradur-sur-Glane civilians.
@@stesilaus1688 Yeah sure. They invaded France…. oh no wait a minute.
Not in France but in Poland they were killing 100 civilians for one German "soldier"
It was 50 in greece
Don't do it then!!!
Great video mate. One little tip, I believe the e at the end of the guys name is silent so you just pronounce the pf.
"e" not silent in this case...just sayin '.
@@josephstabile9154 so is it really pronounced Kemfer or Kemfar (both are used in this) because it doesn't sound right to me but I'm no expert I was just going off other German names that I've heard when people are speaking.
Would be sounded out like this: Kemp-feh. Accent on 1st syllable.
War is truly hell
This type of situation is all too common in counterinsurgency situations and is conterproductive. Ultimately, reprisals only lead to more recruits for the insurgents.
Yeah and winning the hearts and minds has worked so well for the usa! Need to find out how the Brits subdued Malaysia insurgents but they're not talking. Only successful counter insurgency campaign.
@@davidcole2685 if I recall correctly the brits succeeded because the insurgents were a different ethnic group (Chinese, around 3% of the population) than the majority of Ethnic Malays. Even though the Malays wanted independence from Britain, the chaos and instability of the war gradually turned them against the insurgents.
It wasn’t so much the Brits winning, as it was the Insurgents screwing it up and alienating their support base.
No brand new wisdom: Every innocent victim creates new revengers !
I don't get it? Who are the insurgents here? The people who have always lived here and own the place?
@@johnbishop5316 Isn’t that who “insurgents” usually are?
we are such a cruel race
Humans are not a race. Humans are a species. Period. Race is akin to skin color.
@@armlovesmetal1036 And it comes with a Card ..
@@armlovesmetal1036 Race is also skull shape, IQ, testosterone levels and many other characteristics.
I did not know this. Horrific!
Especially the army gear
The resistance should have expected a reprisal such as this.
@Philip Carpenter He's smarter than the French resistance. I'll tell you that
@Philip Carpenter Whatever you say Philip. Carry on being the grumpy old shite you've always been. Peace ✌
Hi i agree with carcrazy why did they not fight in uniform
@Philip Carpenter I think you need to do some proper homework and keep the wise cracks down. Please look at the facts..and stop massaging them to fit your criteria..
Prisoner status Edit
Before the two world wars, the term franc-tireur was sometimes used for an armed fighter who, if captured, was not necessarily entitled to prisoner of war status. An issue of disagreement at the 1899 Hague Conference, the controversy generated the Martens Clause. The Martens Clause was introduced as a compromise between the Great Powers, who considered francs-tireurs to be unlawful combatants subject to execution on capture, and smaller states, who maintained that they should be considered lawful combatants.[9][10]
After World War II, during the Hostages Trial,[11] the seventh of the Nuremberg Trials, the tribunal found that, on the question of partisans, according to the then-current laws of war, the partisan fighters in southeast Europe could not be considered lawful belligerents under Article 1 of the Hague Convention.[12] In relation to Wilhelm List, the tribunal stated:
We are obliged to hold that such guerrillas were francs tireurs who, upon capture, could be subjected to the death penalty. Consequently, no criminal responsibility attaches to the defendant List because of the execution of captured partisans...[12]
The post-war Geneva Convention established new protocols; according to Article 4 of the Third Geneva Convention of 1949, francs-tireurs are entitled to prisoner-of-war status provided that they are commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates, have a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance, carry arms openly, and conduct their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.
@Philip Carpenter the “men” that murdered this SS man..along with several other German soldiers were prisoners of war..simples..look and read up the facts. You yourself would even agree that law needs to be shown in order that you show yourself to be the greater good! Even for an SS soldier. These “men” soon shot off into the hills and left the town of Oradour to its fate...one did not see them coming back to fight the SS Battalion (even in the morning as they shot 2 unarmed men in a nearby area...so the warning(s) were already out weren’t they?) BEFORE the SS Bn moved into Oradour.
Please read history properly with in depth literature THEN formulate a mature opinion open for discussion/debate
If you feel incapable of this..I suggest you go home and spend the money you would otherwise have spent on educating yourself and insulate your roof.
This story wasn't widely publicized until just a few years ago, my family comes from kleinpestiz, near Dresden,I am sure there is some relation . Thanks for your story
I had never heard of it before. Tragic for all of us
@John Stamos A lot of cities got destroyed during the war but I'd hardly describe such sad activities as hilarious.
@@zachstadler9180
A war crime is a war crime and can never be justified.
An eye for an eye.
And yet the USA gave safe heaven to these war criminals?
We only gave a few, Safe Haven because they turned over many other of their comrades. In return, we gave hundreds of thousands of Jews Safe Haven and Citizenship here in the US.
@@benvasilinda9729 - They didn't turn anyone over, they where given a safe heaven because the US thought they had usefull skills.
At 2:32, you mean “1943” not “1933”. Germany was NOT at war with Russia in ‘33. But otherwise, another great video 👍👍👍
Yes also said 1925 instead of 1935
I caught that too.
Feel better now?
@@hepburn118 KD's comment was respectful and was helping correct some important points. What was the point of your comment?
@@rochat I dont feel like I have to explain myself to the likes of you.
I had a chuckle when Closed Captioning (8:16) called him " Hemorrhoid Kemphar" 🤣🤣🤣
🤣
It s sad that many died for the preservation of Freedom!
Poetic justice if you ask me.
In what way was this mass killing 'poetic justice'?
@@sailorman8668 either you miss understood or are just thick. It's poetic justice the way he was executed for what part he played in the mass killing.