Why the new sixth-gen Spike missile is a game-changer for Apache

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2024
  • A sixth-generation missile is being integrated onto Apache attack helicopters, offering greater range and lethality.
    The test-firing of the Spike missile from Apache was conducted both day and night at the US Army Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona over five days.
    The weapon has been described as an "awesome capability" that can be a "game-changer".
    Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
    Check out our website: www.forces.net/
    Facebook: / forcestv
    Instagram: forcesnews...
    X: / forcesnews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 173

  • @springer3783
    @springer3783 4 місяці тому +155

    Can’t wait to see our order of 2 days combat worth

    • @aaronstreeval3910
      @aaronstreeval3910 4 місяці тому +14

      The sad truth 💀

    • @pantherowow77
      @pantherowow77 4 місяці тому +6

      At an eye watering price

    • @TheMacdaddy1976
      @TheMacdaddy1976 4 місяці тому

      Aye they will order 25 missiles and give Ukraine another 2 billion cash

    • @solareclipse9379
      @solareclipse9379 4 місяці тому

      Sad truth is when this helicopter used against anything tougher than goatherders, it will be blown out the sky by portable AA missile launched by soldier. On modern warfare every vehicle and aircraft become obsolete.

    • @farminky
      @farminky 4 місяці тому +2

      Thanks for recycling the manufacturers video 😂

  • @Jupiter.141
    @Jupiter.141 4 місяці тому +11

    Man the phrase "game changer" has been used a lot recently

    • @DriveByShouting
      @DriveByShouting 4 місяці тому +1

      Especially by the Russian Military.

    • @themarketm8382
      @themarketm8382 4 місяці тому +2

      @@DriveByShouting Lmao when? It's only American weapons that have been described as game changers but have gone onto fail whether it's JDAM, AGM-88, HIMARS has been MIA since AD has been beefed up, only thing that gets through 1 out of 30 days of the month are storm shadows barely.

    • @misterrobot1143
      @misterrobot1143 2 місяці тому

      so many western "game changers", revealing themselves to be western "gay changers"

    • @David-zo7bg
      @David-zo7bg 15 днів тому

      ​​@@themarketm8382Don't lie. Himars is a game changer. Cheap price, and hard to shoot down. Look what it done to Russian air defence and howitzers
      The war in Ukraine showed the real capabilities of Russian military equipment.

  • @ru5h7
    @ru5h7 4 місяці тому +3

    I think we all can agree Apache is one of the Best Combat Proven Attack Heli in the World

  • @IsraelMilitaryChannel
    @IsraelMilitaryChannel 4 місяці тому +40

    The 6th generation SPIKE NLOS now has an extended range of up to 50 km when launched from a helicopter and up to 32km when fired from land or naval platforms. A single operator and launcher can fire and control up to four missiles simultaneously, allowing for the element of surprise against enemy forces. Also the new Target Image Acquisition capability allows the NLOS to pick out the commander’s tank or the most important hostile asset and strike it.
    Control over the sixth generation SPIKE missile can be transferred between battlefield platforms mid-flight, allowing for uninterrupted operational pace and seamless collaboration between systems. For example, if a helicopter launches the missile but flies out of the area, a ground vehicle in the same attack zone vicinity can take control of it and navigate the missile toward the target.

    • @user-qh7gb2cn9v
      @user-qh7gb2cn9v 4 місяці тому

      Хочу спросить , а какая дальность стрельбы Hellfier

    • @mastermariner490
      @mastermariner490 4 місяці тому

      @@user-qh7gb2cn9v7-11 km

    • @user-vy3ci2ks4d
      @user-vy3ci2ks4d 4 місяці тому +3

      Şalom 🙏🇮🇱🤝🇬🇷🇨🇾
      Thank you.

    • @bks252
      @bks252 4 місяці тому

      I thought it was NLOS? What’s guiding it?

  • @asan1050
    @asan1050 4 місяці тому

    Thank you for posting.

  • @darrencorrigan8505
    @darrencorrigan8505 4 місяці тому

    Thanks, Forces News.

  • @opinionatedpossum1945
    @opinionatedpossum1945 4 місяці тому +12

    We have great weapons-we just don't manufacture more than 10 of anything. You know what would REALLY impress me?-show me a cool weapon and explain how the contractors can make HUGE VOLUMES month after month. The war in Ukraine shows the errors in our defense industry, which seems geared around high-ticket systems and job creation rather than fighting and winning serious conflicts.

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 4 місяці тому +1

      The UK would need to expend 4% of GDP on the military to afford large amounts of equipment like the US. But UK’s economy has already grown slowly over the last 15 years. Spending that much on the military would ruin long term economic growth for the UK
      Besides, the US is allied with Britain. The UK is never going to be fighting alone. America gets stuff in mass quantities, more than enough to share with the UK and other European countries in a war
      UK might have to fight a country like Argentina alone but they’re weak so that’s not really something to worry about

    • @Raptorman0909
      @Raptorman0909 4 місяці тому +1

      I think you have your evaluation backwards! The SU-57 has been a thing for a long time and yet Russia only has less than 20 in operation. They also have many other advanced weapons made in very low numbers. The US, OTH, has built more than 1000 F-35's. In Ukraine, Russia is sending troops to the front without weapons or ammo and have instructed their soldiers that it is their responsibility to provide such things. One of the items they told their soldiers to by is tampons -- to staunch the flow of blood if they're shot! I mean, it's like you have it exactly bass akwards!

    • @CorePathway
      @CorePathway 4 місяці тому

      It’s an Israeli made product. Watch your We

    • @opinionatedpossum1945
      @opinionatedpossum1945 4 місяці тому +1

      @@CorePathway Ummm…what?

  • @olivergrundy5205
    @olivergrundy5205 4 місяці тому +4

    How about we get Brimstone on it then - best missile of all of them

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 4 місяці тому

      Different seeker, shorter range, not as versatile

    • @bootlegpete7984
      @bootlegpete7984 4 місяці тому +1

      @@Orbital_Inclination Brimestone II has a 60km range. Its also faster and packs way more of a punch, plus can be launched in salvo. There is also a Brimestone III now so just imagine that things capabilities... Do some research and try again.

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 4 місяці тому

      @@bootlegpete7984 the stated range is 40+ km. My other points still stand.

    • @bootlegpete7984
      @bootlegpete7984 4 місяці тому +1

      @@Orbital_Inclination The UK opted for the Javelin over the Spike years ago for infantry operations so versatility isnt an issue, plus Brimstones built in house and is Typhoon and Drone compatible. Its a no brainer.

  • @davidrobertsemail
    @davidrobertsemail 4 місяці тому +3

    How many will we buy? 20? 30?

  • @railworker8058
    @railworker8058 4 місяці тому +2

    Spike is a game changer cos war is a game we can all enjoy.

  • @heinedenmark
    @heinedenmark 4 місяці тому +12

    I believe UK artillery is also getting Spike NLOS. For the Deep Strike brigade.

  • @Fester_
    @Fester_ 4 місяці тому +2

    It flew around the obstacle. Wicked.

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 4 місяці тому

      Meh, BrahMos Block-III does a 105 degree turn and a direct vertical dive on Chinese targets hiding behind a Himalayan mountain. And it does that not at subsonic speeds like this missile, but at Mach 3.

  • @joso5554
    @joso5554 4 місяці тому +2

    Israeli Spike missiles are probably the best ATGMs.

  • @paulappelle6338
    @paulappelle6338 4 місяці тому

    To Robert who mentioned the javelin missile ,that’s a shoulder fired anti tank like Bazooka

  • @nearestyoutube
    @nearestyoutube 4 місяці тому +2

    Game changer.... I prefer 'revolutionary'

  • @robertg8565
    @robertg8565 4 місяці тому +5

    I like the fact that unline the Javelin, The Spike ATGM varient can be guided to a different target mid flight.

    • @g.w.7893
      @g.w.7893 4 місяці тому

      variant*

    • @peter.wilson
      @peter.wilson 4 місяці тому

      The man-portable flight time of a Javelin is maybe 15 seconds... how/why could you possibly change the target mid-flight?

    • @robertg8565
      @robertg8565 4 місяці тому

      @@peter.wilson look it up yourself. Israeli Spike & French MP Akeron.

  • @richardmeo2503
    @richardmeo2503 4 місяці тому +1

    That is a huge difference in range and survivability.

    • @death_parade
      @death_parade 4 місяці тому +2

      It is such a difference that the Indian Air Force, instead of getting their Apache, Rudra and Prachand attack helicopters equipped with the Spike NLOS is instead getting their Mi-17V5 transport helicopters equipped with Spike NLOS.
      The thinking is that attack heptrs are survivable even when close to the frontline as it is (terrain masking in Himalayas against the Chinese), so better to get the transports ready to fire missiles from stand-off ranges of 40-50 km.

  • @cabalamat2289
    @cabalamat2289 4 місяці тому +5

    Britain will probably buy this instead of our own Brimstone missile.

  • @motaman8074
    @motaman8074 4 місяці тому

    Nice

  • @zozita.
    @zozita. 4 місяці тому +4

    Beautiful ❤👍🚁🚁

  • @edc1569
    @edc1569 4 місяці тому +1

    I wonder how many were ordering, 12?

  • @user-tt6il2up4o
    @user-tt6il2up4o 4 місяці тому +1

    Game changer, now where have we heard that before for weapons systems that are only effective for a short time.

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 4 місяці тому

      No idea, I'm assuming some ill informed social media clips?

  • @RJM1011
    @RJM1011 4 місяці тому +2

    What about using the Brimstone built in the UK ????

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 4 місяці тому

      That would only happen if the MOD wanted to pay for the weapons integration trials

    • @RJM1011
      @RJM1011 4 місяці тому

      @@Orbital_Inclination Yes I KNOW it has to be paid for ! !

  • @br2266
    @br2266 4 місяці тому

    Well I can’t wait to see the 6th gen S + Pro Max missile

  • @briancooper2112
    @briancooper2112 3 місяці тому

    Cool

  • @kreb7
    @kreb7 4 місяці тому

    Greece also changed some of the Apaches into spike NLOS. This is in order to hit air defences

  • @chigeryelam4061
    @chigeryelam4061 4 місяці тому

    Is the UK getting this in addition to JAGM? Or is that a bit optimistic?

  • @alanaldpal950
    @alanaldpal950 4 місяці тому +3

    50Km range ? Well, yes that would be a “game changer”

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 4 місяці тому +3

      Everything new is a "game changer" on this channel.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP 4 місяці тому +4

      @@meme4one
      You have understand context
      Most SHORAD systems range between 10-31 miles
      The Spike NLOS latest variant range is 31 miles
      That means that Spike can easily target Tunguska, Panstir , Buk and Tor systems without ever getting range
      Remember that Spike has small launchers that can be carried by Helo
      Imagine special forces carry Spikes NLOS and simultaneously attacking the enemy key target

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 4 місяці тому

      ​@@verdebusterAPfully aware yes and also very aware nobody takes helicopters into an area that we don't already have full air and ground to air superiority, manpads accepted. I can see this being used for indirect fire support, directed by ground units the same way artillery is called in or having a javalin but not having to carry it. But flying rw against shorad? Seems an unlikely scenario.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP 4 місяці тому +1

      @@meme4one
      No indirect first with precision missiles
      its all precise targeting

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 4 місяці тому

      @@verdebusterAP sorry indirect was the wrong term. I meant fire support. I really cannot believe anyone would fire rw when air defences haven't been already suppressed. Yes it can stand off safely from shorad but they doesn't mean there isn't an unknown / hidden system closer by.

  • @notapplicable4567
    @notapplicable4567 4 місяці тому

    Is it infared guided or visually guided

  • @WaywardMax218
    @WaywardMax218 4 місяці тому

    I want this in War THunder

  • @JustReed
    @JustReed 4 місяці тому

    We are America!

  • @hmodywakid
    @hmodywakid Місяць тому

    wonder how this compare to the russian counter part missile LMUR- iizdeliye 305

  • @frankdrevinpolicesquad2930
    @frankdrevinpolicesquad2930 4 місяці тому

    Sure has a smokey exhaust. Looks like a 1970's F4 Phantom

  • @eshvartz
    @eshvartz 4 місяці тому +20

    With love from Israel to our American brothers and sisters.

    • @Geezer2006
      @Geezer2006 4 місяці тому +4

      This is british

    • @eshvartz
      @eshvartz 4 місяці тому +8

      @@Geezer2006 British army? Cause neither the Apache or the Spike are British

    • @Geezer2006
      @Geezer2006 4 місяці тому +2

      @@eshvartz we are buying them that why they made the vid

    • @timphillips9954
      @timphillips9954 4 місяці тому +2

      @@eshvartz But there again the Brits did invent the jet engine / turbo jet / vertical take of jet fighter and the tank just to name a few examples of British technology.

    • @Yakob135
      @Yakob135 4 місяці тому +3

      The USA stands with you 🇺🇸❤️🇮🇱

  • @phooogle
    @phooogle 4 місяці тому +6

    Does it stop the helo from falling over in the wind?😂

    • @tigeruntamed6036
      @tigeruntamed6036 4 місяці тому

      ??? Is this a joke? Apaches aren't built like whatever backwater country you come from

  • @posmoo9790
    @posmoo9790 4 місяці тому

    so if you have recon over an area 50km away and you have air superiority why not drop a JDAM-ER on it? why mess around with an apache & a tiny warhead. I mean if America can ever get around to producing JDAM-ER that is. Or a HIMARS. or a JSOW. this seems like a solution in search of a problem.

  • @randomthoughts9463
    @randomthoughts9463 4 місяці тому +5

    I cringe when narrarators use the term "game-changer". I would have hoped this would be banned by 2024.This is just lazy and SUPER overused. It seems the radio ads are saying my Chicken Ranch Subway Sub has become a game changer. Really?
    IMO - If you are stuck for words, try subbing with these as just a few examples:
    Try:
    Pivotal moment
    Paradigm shift
    Power shift
    Momentum shift
    Major shift
    Revolutionary
    Innovative leap forward
    Disruption of power
    Catalyst for change
    Transformational capability
    Turning point
    Turn the tide
    Tipping point
    Inflection point
    Watershed moment
    Shake-up
    Sea change

    • @bertjilk3456
      @bertjilk3456 4 місяці тому +2

      Agreed. And while they're at it, stop calling everything 'iconic'.

    • @samitthongbam4891
      @samitthongbam4891 4 місяці тому

      🤓🤓

  • @swannmonitor6229
    @swannmonitor6229 4 місяці тому

    …not so sure as 1000 cheap drones with small and therefore cheaper explosive payloads can cause massive damage especially when operating as a swarm. Use off the shelf technologies and open source software.

  • @kskeel1124
    @kskeel1124 4 місяці тому

    Funny I've never once seen one used in combat?😂

    • @Orbital_Inclination
      @Orbital_Inclination 4 місяці тому +1

      There are probably a lot of things you haven't personally seen

  • @swoosh13
    @swoosh13 4 місяці тому

    @Gaijin pls

  • @BigJaseNZ
    @BigJaseNZ 4 місяці тому

    Oh god, this is gonna be in War Thunder soon and is the last thing we need!

    • @GOD719
      @GOD719 4 місяці тому

      First thing we need. U.S has a win rate of 10% to 20%.

    • @Shehbaz666
      @Shehbaz666 4 місяці тому

      How would this be any more OP than a Ka-50 Vikhr?

  • @jon6815
    @jon6815 4 місяці тому +2

    why does the video show a missile being fired on such a relatively simple target/range/topography? Isn't that a waste of its capabilities? Or is this stock footage?

    • @Bob10009
      @Bob10009 4 місяці тому +7

      Testing always starts simple and then gets more complex …..

    • @willw8011
      @willw8011 4 місяці тому +3

      Yuma Proving Ground is in the desert of Western Arizona. The US Army does a lot of missile and artillery testing at Yuma Proving Ground. It is a good place for it, because it is good weather and good conditions most of the year.
      Interestingly enough, the Boeing builds the AH-64 in Mesa Arizona. The helicopter in the video is probably owned by Boeing for testing. It does not have any military markings. It looks like it has civilian tail number.

  • @andrewhumphries4029
    @andrewhumphries4029 4 місяці тому +2

    Why use an expensive helicopter flown by an expensive pilot? Drones will dominate the battlefield in future and many will be AI to seek out and destroy the enemy using missiles such as this.

    • @Dave-us5fq
      @Dave-us5fq 4 місяці тому +3

      Because we aren’t in the future yet.
      Drones won’t make everything obsolete. Not for a long time anyway…

    • @al28854
      @al28854 4 місяці тому

      much more difficult to hack human pilots, for now.

  • @hydrogreen1111
    @hydrogreen1111 4 місяці тому +2

    Game changer for who exactly? Wall Street?

  • @W1ckedRcL
    @W1ckedRcL 4 місяці тому +1

    The Apache DESPERATELY needs a new missile.
    It's a one trick pony. Upgrading the only thing it can do is an absolute must.

  • @user-lm7dg9dv3e
    @user-lm7dg9dv3e 4 місяці тому

    Unzurna

  • @gunshipzeroone3546
    @gunshipzeroone3546 4 місяці тому +1

    Well, that great and all, but this gunship does lack in air to air weaponry such as aim 92h or aim x9 could be fitted on the wing tips so it can still carry crv70mm and agm 114k.

    • @Budget_Prepper
      @Budget_Prepper 4 місяці тому +11

      The Apache is an American platform with American battle philosophy built into the design. The US Army doesn't concern itself with air to air combat capabilities. We expect to have total air superiority or air supremacy before we even engage the enemy.

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 4 місяці тому +2

      @@JimCarner The US Navy/Marine Viper Attack Helicopter can use Aim-9 air to air missiles on the wing tips. But they took away the ability for the Apache to mount missiles on its wing tips after the Apache D variant. And put advanced missile/drone warning systems on the wing tips instead. Although air to air missiles can still be carried under the wing hardpoints, but it’s never done since that capability is not needed.
      The Apache doesn’t need air to air missiles since air superiority would be guaranteed by the F-35 and F-22. And drones can be taken care of by the M-Shorad system or the Avenger
      So the US chose to make the Apache more survivable against Manpads and short range SAMs instead.

    • @tylerclayton6081
      @tylerclayton6081 4 місяці тому

      The Apache can carry air to air missiles under the wing hard points. But it’s never done for obvious reasons. Air supremacy is already guaranteed for the US due to the F-35, F-22, F-16 Block 70, F-15

    • @commando552
      @commando552 4 місяці тому

      @@tylerclayton6081 I thought they put the capabiliy back on the E after initially removing it, I think it was South Korea specifically who requested it. They are not used by US, but it would be possible to mount them if the need were to arise.

    • @latch9781
      @latch9781 4 місяці тому +1

      Apache can mount wingtip starstreaks as well as engage aerial targets with it's 30mm chaingun

  • @makoado6010
    @makoado6010 4 місяці тому

    hungarian lynx41a carry two of this missiles. about a year ago.

  • @martinklanecky7281
    @martinklanecky7281 4 місяці тому

    ?

  • @nathanielwhite8769
    @nathanielwhite8769 4 місяці тому +3

    I don’t doubt for one minute the Spike Missile Family is world class, after all Isreal does have one of the worlds most technically advanced defence industries, but it still mystifies me as to why the MOD choose to spend millions on JAGM and as I suspect are probably eyeing up Spike NLOS for the (Over the Horizon Attack Requirement) for the AH-64E, instead of our own, in service and combat proven Brimstone II Missile. This is supposedly because of budgetary and technical risk reasons.
    This is despite, and as far as I am aware, Brimstone having some of the initial Intergration feasibility R&D already undertaken. Unless there is a more significant reason than the above, I feel that this likely to be another case of defence contract corruption between the MOD and LM and Washington!

  • @THESocialJusticeWarrior
    @THESocialJusticeWarrior 4 місяці тому

    Now prove it in Ukraine.

  • @lukeweidemann9166
    @lukeweidemann9166 4 місяці тому +1

    The UK isn even getting this missile. We bought a less effective US missile at an eye watering price!😂

    • @al28854
      @al28854 4 місяці тому

      never say never

  • @bobnewhart4183
    @bobnewhart4183 4 місяці тому +9

    🇮🇱 MADE IN ISRAEL 🇮🇱

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 4 місяці тому +2

      Mods are busy this morning or am I just wearing my little tin foil hat?

  • @Romankv
    @Romankv 4 місяці тому

    фотошоп

  • @someutubchannel69
    @someutubchannel69 4 місяці тому

    Has the Apache been Battle Tested vs a real adversary?

    • @sebastianvagabond4692
      @sebastianvagabond4692 4 місяці тому +5

      Iraq and Syria both have SAM capabilities

    • @meme4one
      @meme4one 4 місяці тому

      @@sebastianvagabond4692 were they active when apaches were airborne? I'm pretty sure day 1 of a modern war is to destroy all gbad.

    • @user-tt6il2up4o
      @user-tt6il2up4o 4 місяці тому +1

      @@sebastianvagabond4692very funny, no is the answer they have not.

    • @sebastianvagabond4692
      @sebastianvagabond4692 4 місяці тому

      @@user-tt6il2up4o ahhhh my bad.

    • @kareharpies
      @kareharpies 4 місяці тому

      Now you know we only fight against dirt poor countries with rebels waving arrows and guns why you even ask this question 😭😫

  • @grahamthebaronhesketh.
    @grahamthebaronhesketh. 4 місяці тому

    Prince Harry at the wheel.

    • @RJM1011
      @RJM1011 4 місяці тому +1

      No he gave up and run away to the USA.

    • @grahamthebaronhesketh.
      @grahamthebaronhesketh. 4 місяці тому +3

      @@RJM1011 Magic mushrooms and hellfire missiles.....not a good combo...

  • @MBO_Bama
    @MBO_Bama 4 місяці тому

    So, it'll take the UK about a decade to buy, test, and deploy. By then, it'll be obsolete.

  • @thepeacockk
    @thepeacockk 4 місяці тому

    Video of a helllfire lmao

  • @cattigereyes1
    @cattigereyes1 4 місяці тому +1

    It needs to laser systems to take out incoming threats. These systems would be AI aimed. With far faster reflexes.

  • @richowens600
    @richowens600 4 місяці тому +1

    Israeli by name how much US money out into it

    • @alimanski7941
      @alimanski7941 4 місяці тому

      It's made by a private Israeli company, Rafael. Development paid for by the IDF. US aid money can only be spent with US arms manufacturers, so exactly $0 is the answer. Sweet of you to assume Israel can't develop advanced munition on its own without US input.

  • @tylerdurden4006
    @tylerdurden4006 4 місяці тому +2

    Love it when america uses "game changer" and quotation marks, it means it is all lies and just fake propaganda 😂

  • @oSJmee
    @oSJmee 4 місяці тому

    Attack helicopters are such a waste of money today. They are expensive, need a lot of maintenance and are a serious risk to their pilots.

    • @al28854
      @al28854 4 місяці тому

      that's so nice of you to say that, BTW ...... can you add another chocolate shake and large fries to my order?

    • @oSJmee
      @oSJmee 4 місяці тому

      I don't get the comment, sorry@@al28854

  • @derf9465
    @derf9465 4 місяці тому +2

    Have you given it away for free yet to the Ukrainians? 1

  • @darrensteele7880
    @darrensteele7880 4 місяці тому

    Money money money , Going elsewhere. 🤔🤫🤐

    • @al28854
      @al28854 4 місяці тому

      freedom is not free

  • @tigertiger1699
    @tigertiger1699 4 місяці тому

    Nice