A suggestion. You should add picture and text somewhere on the screen while you talk about it, i had to stop the video and google the cars, its hard to follow.
The 63-68 Studebaker Avanti is a HIGHLY sought after collector car because of the low production numbers. All the rest of these cars especially the Ford Falcons/Mercury Cyclone, the AMC Rebels and the 67-68 Pontiac Tempest are getting rebuilt in droves to be classic daily drivers. Will they be worth big money? No, but you can buy them for 3k all day put 8-10 k into them in a couple weeks and sale them for 18-20k, IF I can make 9k on a car in 2 weeks that's a HUGE win. The problem with "Big money cars" is that it normally takes you too long to build to the level that you get the "big money" out of it, 9k in 2 weeks or 50k in 18 months? do the math on that..........
some of these would make great sleeper muscle cars with modern drivetrain, suspension, etc. you would be buying the style, not performance. but ya, not a good investment.
That depends on your thinking, people see "Classic cars" and visions of "big money cars" gloss over their eyes..... while the "small money cars" are actually a better investment, why? because A. They are cheaper and B. they are generally better taken care of and don't require as much to get them going. I can buy a 63 Falcon for under 3k all day long put another 8k into and sell it 2 weeks later for 20k, where as that 69 Boss Mustang is 12k for a roller that's been beat to shit because it was bought new by some 19 year old who ran it from stop light to stop light, sure when it's done it's worth 75k when it's done but how much money and how time are you going to put into it to get it to that "Big Money" level? your liable to put 40-50k and 18 months worth of work to get it to that 75k level. It's all about the money and time turn around. 9k in 2 weeks or 25-35 in a year in a half? which one is the better investment?
All classic cars are worth saving. We need to encourage people to love and restore these cars.
A suggestion. You should add picture and text somewhere on the screen while you talk about it, i had to stop the video and google the cars, its hard to follow.
@@nikolastojanov8749 thanks for the feedback I will work on that.
The 63-68 Studebaker Avanti is a HIGHLY sought after collector car because of the low production numbers. All the rest of these cars especially the Ford Falcons/Mercury Cyclone, the AMC Rebels and the 67-68 Pontiac Tempest are getting rebuilt in droves to be classic daily drivers. Will they be worth big money? No, but you can buy them for 3k all day put 8-10 k into them in a couple weeks and sale them for 18-20k, IF I can make 9k on a car in 2 weeks that's a HUGE win. The problem with "Big money cars" is that it normally takes you too long to build to the level that you get the "big money" out of it, 9k in 2 weeks or 50k in 18 months? do the math on that..........
some of these would make great sleeper muscle cars with modern drivetrain, suspension, etc. you would be buying the style, not performance. but ya, not a good investment.
That depends on your thinking, people see "Classic cars" and visions of "big money cars" gloss over their eyes..... while the "small money cars" are actually a better investment, why? because A. They are cheaper and B. they are generally better taken care of and don't require as much to get them going. I can buy a 63 Falcon for under 3k all day long put another 8k into and sell it 2 weeks later for 20k, where as that 69 Boss Mustang is 12k for a roller that's been beat to shit because it was bought new by some 19 year old who ran it from stop light to stop light, sure when it's done it's worth 75k when it's done but how much money and how time are you going to put into it to get it to that "Big Money" level? your liable to put 40-50k and 18 months worth of work to get it to that 75k level. It's all about the money and time turn around. 9k in 2 weeks or 25-35 in a year in a half? which one is the better investment?