The verdict was fair, the jury was fair, the judge was fair. The only reason she finds it not to be fair is because SHE LOST. Respect the verdict and move on.
She actually can’t ... she must double down or fade into obscurity and possibly even poverty - I gather it didn’t go so well with Elon either - not sure if it’s true, but apparently there’s some brouhaha involving embryos he co-owned and wanted destroyed.... Probably after realising she has serious mental issues....and she won’t be able to trade on her looks forever.
The interviewer giving notice that her husband worked for the legal team in the past blew my mind. Hearing the most basic professional honesty in news was insane to me.
The interviewer was a little bit shady by saying her husband was not involved with 'this interview'. Begs the next question, so what was he involved with?
@@richarddevenezia8186 he either might just generally have consulted with Brown Rudnick (the law firm depps team works for) or he could have consulted with a different case involving depp
I’m so annoyed that Heard’s PR team keeps saying there is a social media campaign. No! There’s literally billions of smart people that watched the trial & saw the evidence. We are not “bots”. We just don’t like liars, we just don’t like you Amber. Quit pretending we are bots because you can’t comprehend billion of people around the world hate you Amber 🤦🏻♀️
Amber and her team brought the internet into this case. They were talking about the hashtags; such as, Amberturd, etc. Then, she told the jury to go look her up and they can see how they were attacking her, saying put her baby in the microwave crap. She brought the internet up. Plus, the jurors saw the signs of the Deppheads when they left the courthouse. They seen the love and support for JD. So yes, it was everywhere because it was in and right outside the courthouse. I also would like to say, prior to this verdict, JD was labeled a wife beater. He had to live with the humiliation for years. The media wrote all sorts of crap about him and HE'S had to deal with it. But he didn't smear Amber. He abided his time and stayed silent. The media, love and support was in her favor. Now that the tables are turned, you STILL continue to defame this man. Its your turn to find a quiet corner, hunker down and stay silent. He should make her pay the money, garner her wages, something! Then he can donate the funds and show her how donations are performed. Just saying.
Exactly!! We all saw it! And I totally agree with you about making her pay that money!! To have it all automatically go straight to charity would be absolute justice!!
I completely agree with everything you said!! And like they say he's not in it for the money, he just wanted to clear his name! So I can imagine that he would donate that $2M, if he does ever see it anyway 😠 (it's too bad they can't change the UK ruling 😢 he deserves that too!!!)
I’m so glad depp got out of this crap, as someone who was falsely accused of abuse and sa by the most toxic ex i’ve ever had in my life, makes me really happy to see him get through this. She almost ruined my life in college, it was fucked up. Good for him
I’d hoped that the Amberberg Iceberg would NOW let it go….Slink off to obscurity …. Crawl under the porch and lick her wounds like a sick cat…..but NO?….SHE won’t let it go, she’s planning to appeal…and keep it going. EeLaine should take note that Johnny’s lawyer cost him $2.million….how much are HER defaming, unsubstantiated statements going to cost Amberberg? Nor should she be impugning the ethics of the Jury and the Judge and THEN claiming this case was decided in the court of public opinion of the Social media . WTHECK is AMBER checking out Social Media ? She’s STILL under oath ALONG with ALL the witnesses AND the jury and ALL those who had testified and might be recalled to testify AGAIN….. EVERYONE and ALL of them were admonished NOT to access, or research social media , News etc..! The worst offender of breaching this order, is Amber herself.
Yes, I've seen this happen to people that are really close to me and Amber Heard acted exactly like those toxic companions. I feel like most people are familiar with this type of behavior to some extent.
@@Chimchimchu that sucks, it’s so frustrating how these people just fake tears and make up convoluted stories to fish for sympathy and get people to gang up on the person they’re accusing, i can’t imagine being that shitty of a person :/
@@Kidcrowley Yeah, shit like that makes me want to get a written contract before doing anything physical with someone or even audio recordings during the deed to prove it was consensual but the latter seems a little creepy to me so probably just a contract. Though even with a contract they could just say they revoked/voided it whatever or changed their minds afterwards then said no... 😅
Camille is a fine example of what a true lawyer supposed to represent. Like a superwoman, she hammered down hard on Amber's gaslighting until it all came crashing down, because she had enough emotional intelligence to know a lie when she sees one. She used the truth like kryptonite to weaken Amber's phoney narrative. What a historic moment to witness IRT! Lawyer is the new superhero, watch out! ⚖️💪
she isnt a superwoman, shes a good lawyer that just so happens to be a woman. The less we objectify good behavior as "super" and *instead think of it as the simple proper way to conduct oneself, the more we will see people doing good things, imo.
The main thing I feel killed her case was how gruesome the acts of violence he afflicted onto her but then had pictures of her the exact next day after with absolutely no marks at all and instead of admitting to little things she was obviously caught not telling the truth but building it out be way more horrendous then original statements
You make a good point. I kept thinking about Rhianna's face and how she canceled gigs and needed surgery after that beating, and it didn't seem near as graphic as what Amber was talking about. It just doesn't add up.
The jury analysed the evidence and 7 weeks of testimonies. Like you said, no proof, no medical records, some pics of a very small possibly fake bruise or a botox bruise, cops didnt see anything except a bunch of leeching lowlifers chilling in the couch, property damage without knowing who did it, audio tapes of amber heard being abusive & admitting to it & saying no one will believe him because he's a man, amber heard cheating on johnny and laughing about it and so much more. Social media can influence some opinions sure but cannot change the evidence the jury was looking into for 7 weeks.
@@AmberGraves80 Yeah Amber decided to describe things happening that would have put her in a coma or outright killed her with how often she said it was happening.
to be fair amber's team has a duty to be zealous advocates for her so it makes sense some of her bs would wash off on them. I don't think they're shitty people they just had to defend one
@@PianuReeves I disagree.... Granny elaine has stood by amber at least since day one of her nasty lies and accusations when she got the RESTRAINING ORDER and went on promoting the metoo movement with photos ....and you can see that for a fact if you look up photos of when amber was acting like the face of the movement. Her sister and Elaine were in the photos all mg side of her. Elaine knows exactly who she has been representing. They both think alike.
I want people to notice that Ben and Camille did not speak about what JOHNNY said to them as it is under client privilege. They spoke about how others saw him (hearsay) and how they think he feels"sense of relief" (speculation) Meanwhile Elaine's went full quotation on what Her client told Her in private. See the stark difference? It's the very first question and Elaine failed or it was a calculated move with consent from Amber which shows the Manipulative side of the whole issue.
You should look at a channel called the black belt Barrister . He is a UK lawyer doing a petition to get the UK case to be looked at by judges because he doesn't feel that Johnny got a fair trial. The link to the petition is in his video talking about the this
@Carl Gunderson did the judges son own The Sun? I heard he was just an employee at their sister company... Either way though the judge should've recused himself from the case due to his personal bias. Total bullturd!
@Carl Gunderson it does matter , not only did he have to pay the sun money the ruling wasn't right and it was unfair. The judge also used laws and rules but didn't apply them to both sides to equally. Right and wrong matter so does honestly.
@Carl Gunderson There is more than one Judge in the UK - have it looked at by a 2nd and 3rd if necessary, but for this bias to be so well-known is enough grounds to have the case completely dismissed... IF we were talking about the case of Heard vs. Depp. That trial was for the SUN vs. DEPP and while the statements from the judge were damning (and downright egregious) at the end of the day the rag that is the SUN can apparently do what it pleases. Is that fair or just? No and that's what BBB is trying to resolve with their petition in the long-term.
I like to think that we're heading back to the Age of Enlightenment when the rockstars were the scientists whose lecture halls were packed with people wanting to see the next big discovery.
why does chat just talks about camile and " oh my queen camile" and no one references bejamin ,bunch of double standarts bull crap around here, fk these simps for real lol
I have totally been affected by this BS. I despise Amber. When she acknowledges to the world that she lied, abused JD and comes to terms that she needs therapy. No will will ever take her seriously. It's done.
@@frankmozzone1338 it's crazy even elon got fooled. I wonder how he felt when she wouldn't destroy the embryos. I think Amber had that baby to get at least some level of support from Elon
Why have you been affected? Serious question? I was abused by someone just like Amber but I don’t consider this as having personally effected me so I’m curious why it’s effected you?
@@IratePuffin I think they mean it pissed them off, made them feel repulsed enough to actually feel a negative feeling? could be wrong, obviously it's my own interpretation, I'm just saying I don't think it's a direct thing, more like an indirect, reactionary thing?
I hope she says something that Johnny can sue her for, again. Isn’t she continuing to defame him by saying the exact same things on national television after they were PROVEN to be false? How is this different from the OP ED? I understand people believe him now, but this still shouldn’t be allowed if it can in any way hurt his image. Especially the way they are promoting these interviews like they’re sitting down with this wrongly accused woman and making her out to be a victim.
Exactly my thoughts after the first Interview by Elaine. How can you lose a defamation trial and then proceed to defame the person at least indirectly in saying the whole thing was rigged, without any evidence by the way? I can understand why JD wouldn't sue her, he wants to get over it. But I think the some authorities should intervene here in some way or the other.
Yes, she is opening herself up to further litigation. JD can file an injunction against her to make her stop saying these things publicly, with criminal penalties if she does. I sincerely hope he does that.
The judgement against Depp here in the UK was done by a judge and not a jury which straight away is complete BS and the trial here was also missing a lot of evidence that the judge excluded from the case and those are the ‘only’ reasons he lost. I really hope he now asks for a retrial and the judge is investigated as to why the evidence was excluded and how he came to his conclusion because from what I’ve read there was something iffy about the whole thing. I can’t say what as I’ve not read enough on it yet but I intend to. I know the burden of proof is different here and to have excluded evidence that could have led to a different outcome just isn’t right no matter what side of the pond it’s on.
It wasn't against Amber Heard either but a "news agency". Freedom of press is not just a thing in the US. I doubt the trial would be any different even if retried. Op-eds are opinion pieces and as such they only need the slightest sliver of plausible deniability to prevail against defamation cases.
The judge was corrupt...For instance his son had a conflict of interest regarding the SUN. He probably was also an old pervert who allowed heard to charm him. What did Depp think was gonna happen as an American trying to win a case against a newspaper in a foreign country??? The original case againest the SUN was a kangaroo court. Depp shouldn't of even attempted to sue in the UK...
I read that the Judge's son worked for the publication that printed the story. I would think that's a huge conflict of interest on both sides of the pond!
Her argument is that she was tried on social media and that was unfair while ignoring the fact the entire reason for the suit was her using media and social media to destroy him without a trial.
My ex husband pushed me against a door with a large glass pane in it, cutting my shoulders, back, and the back of both my heels when the glass fell down and my feet were against the door. He then reached up and grabbed the top door frame , broken glass and all, and ripped the door in his violent, usual, narcissistic raging ,and tore the door from it's hinges. He ran to his parents who lived one block away, and showing them his gash in his hand, upon their suggestion, called the cops on me. Told the cop I PUSHED HIM THROUGH THE DOOR , he lied, I went to jail. But first had to be taken to a hospital for my cuts. Did he go to jail? No, a restraining order was placed, I couldn't go home, couldn't see my children, I'll never forget this even though it happened 22 years ago. Why was he so enraged and vindictive? Because I told him I met a man who didn't abuse me verbally, emotionally, and physically and I wanted a divorce. This is the way they are, when he knew I no longer wanted to be with him, I wanted to be happy, he lost me and this was his way of getting even. Amber knew Johnny's was done with her , with her abuse, narcs hate losing. They hate losing their supply. My ex lied, ruined my nursing hopes, I was now labeled a abuser, couldn't even get a job as a nurses aid, I know how it feels to have this lie ruin one's life . Social media didn't have a thing to do with my support for Johnny, My support was from clearly seeing through Amber's vicious , malicious , motives and lies. Johnny was the victim and wanted to prove it, he did, and his heart is at peace.
@Jen E. Scott what he did was have a smear campaign against you. Turn your family and children against you. Narcs ( narcissists) hate losing ! They'll mistreat and abuse you , yet don't want anyone else loving you, giving you what they withhold hatefully and selfishly . My ex told my children when I left the home that I didn't want to be with them, and that I was off being a whore ( totally false) I learned this years later Yet he wonders why our children loathe him and have the upmost disdain for him. They are adults now and know the Truth, But I have learned narcs love smearing you, They project the hate and shame they hide inside. So sorry that happened to you. We become better , not bitter. Being happy With Out them drives them nuts! Keep moving ahead to be happy and at peace ♥️
@Jen E. Scott smearing us to our children is mental and emotional abuse towards them, If they're young , and told mommy's a whore and doesn't love you wounds them, scars them, Only when they're older with eyes to see, do they become free , but not completely. The torment and pain leaves it's poison My children ( now young adults have numerous issues that only God and good therapy can mend . The disdain and hate they have for my ex is insurmountable. One son has numerous domestic assault charges on his record, and hates his dad. And cannot truly love any woman . His heart is hardened
Camille Vasquez, Judge Azcarate and Dr. Curry are truly heroes of this case. Well spoken women, who are an inspiration to girls out there to get an education and take pride in the profession of their choosing.
These are the kind of women we need to see more and needs to be place on a pedestal.....Not those only fans one who were able to get millions by showing some skin
The problem with this "social media influence" defense by AH is that people were commenting on the same thing the jurors were stuck for hours listening to. Who would want to torture themselves and watch the same thing again?
*if the jury went online and searched for info on this case then they would've given Depp $50M just in punitive damages!! And they definitely wouldn't have found him liable for one of the counts on Heard's counterclaim! Cause they would've came across the call Rocky Pennington made to 911 where she said someone in her building is being abused but she didn't know her name and wished to remain anonymous! Pffft. In court AH's team argued that I.O made one call only so the second time officers came out was probably just some sort of mistake or that they came to get a statement from Amber. It's a good thing the 911 call was put online so people know the truth of what actually happened. Sucks for the jury though cause JD's team couldn't bring in the fact that RP was the one who placed that call so they didn't have the totality of the evidence to make that judgement. Absolute bullturd!*
This is an excellent point I've never thought about. They would have also known Virginia caps their punitive damages at 350k since that was something talked about by a lot of streamers.
You know what must be most hurtful for Amber Heard? The fact that she got destroyed by a lawyer that is not only smarter, but also better looking than her. When all you have is your good looks, that must be devastating.
why does chat just talks about camile and " oh my queen camile" and no one references bejamin ,bunch of double standarts bull crap around here, fk these simps for real lol
I put more on the blame on Heard than the lawyers. Rottenborn was dealing with what he got and tbh if it wasn't for him then Heard wouldn't have gotten that bone thrown by the jury (though rumors are stating that the jury threw that bone for Heard because of a stubborn juror who didn't want Heard to completely lose for fear of an appeal). His closing was decent given with what he got and he didn't go on live television and bad-mouth the jury or the judge compared to Elaine. He is truly a professional who has been dealt with a bad hand and a lying uncooperative client and thus had to use certain trial tactics to edge out a win. Elaine's partner, Nadelhaft, looked to be done with the case too and is also not going on to television or media complaining, but he is Elaine's partner but I no doubt think he is probably finding a way to quietly withdraw to another firm at this rate. Elaine is a whole other story.
@@coolyeh1017 I don't think she should have gotten the 2 million tbh. With all of the stuff that the jury wasn't able to see...it seems like at least rocky was in on setting stuff up. I don't think it was all of her friends that helped but a couple of them at the very least.
@@PineappleBaconPizza even as a JD supporter we gotta stick to the facts. That statement by waldman was WAY over the top, especially since there were so many elements about it that couldnt all be proven.
I think most people in a jury that took an oath to follow a judges instructions to not view shit about the case that they would follow that instruction. Some people do still have integrity. I am sure people like Amber and her team don't think so. I am so tired of these losers claiming they didn't lose it was rigged. I wish the media would quit shoving this bullshit in our faces.
It is prety on brand for amber. The cops lied, the nurse lied, the manager lied, the bodyguard lied, the judge which was a woman was biased against her. And finally the jury disregard the instruction and were influenced by the internet. Yet it was ok for her to use pledge and donate synonymously. The video on her phone being leaked had nothing to do with her. Those photos had diffrent lighting.
I mean, the jury were being paid almost no money for their time - if they took and oath, sat through 8 hours of this for 4 days every week for 6 weeks, why would they throw all of that in the trash just to go and open up TikTok? The jury was already there in the courtroom and saw everything with their own eyes - why would they be "wrongfully influenced" by something that they've already seen, just because it's on TikTok? It doesn't make sense, and it's unprofessional for a lawyer like Elaine to suggest that the court and the jury didn't do their job. It's easy to accuse someone of being wrongfully influenced - but you can't just accuse a whole entire jury of 7 different people of breaking the rules, just because the verdict is inconvenient to you.
I absolutely agree. I haven't been a juror but I was called in to interview for jury duty along with probably 50 other people. There is a whole process to select jurors and both sides have to agree on each juror. One of the first anxieties I had was "I hope I make the right decisions if they choose me. I don't want to be responsible for an innocent getting punished." There is so much stress because you literally could do more harm than good if you don't follow instructions. Amber's lawyer going around saying the jury didn't do their part correctly is abhorrent. They can appeal but I don't expect any changes.
One thing a lot of wasn't talked about during the whole trial was; Whenever your "abusive partner" is allegedly abusing you physically and sexually, they always do those things regardless of what happens. The evidence suggests Johnny broke cupboards and smashed glasses in the house before he realised he's getting taped. He continues throughout the same procedure afterwards. That is the sign of a person who projects their anger towards objects that are not their significant other. I don't know why this is not mentioned more. Basic psychology.
So to train for trial they put him against the Anti-Wizard Wayne Dennison? Now I feel sorry for Ben Rottenborne because he came undermanned and unprepared! Johnny came in with a Teflon disposition because Dennison gave him a crash course in deconstruction! Man, I would fear that law firm and their might!
Fairly certain the social media was reacting to the stuff inside the trial most of the time, reacting to Amber Heard, reacting to Johnny, Elaine, Camille, Ben, all the same people the jury watched. The fact that they came to the same conclusion isn’t exactly surprising
“domestic violence has no gender””don’t try to destroy someone’s life with lies when yours can be destroyed with the truth””don’t play the victim to situations you created and then flip the story to manipulate people to believing you’re innocent”
This attorney lives in coocoo land , the judge told everyone to go home ,not look on social media or talk to friends and families .but did Amber's team listen ? To know that everyone hates her she must have searched and looked on social media . Johnny kept his calm and good for his attorneys to win this case . The thing with the Sun Paper here in UK should not have pasted those words about Johnny .I bet now they feel stupid seeing Amber lie and hearing those audios . Her demonic laugh alone puts people off . And I thought the UK case should not have been mentioned in this court but her attorney kept throwing it at the judge and juries . If Johnny beat Amber a whole 5 years ,she won't have just that fake bruise ,ask any abused woman out there .their body damaged not to forget their soul and spirit and the depressed state of mind , Amber showed none of this . These two attorneys will be hired , not Elaine with her mantra ( But he lost in UK, but he lost in UK ) ..loser .
In the UK trial AH was a witnessed that was never cross examined. Additionally to accuse the jury of being swayed by social media has to prove they both 1) actively seeked it 2) have the media sway their opinion.
Same I’m watching the trial all over again (except amber on stand with her lawyers) and cracking up laughing with his reactions . Hysterical I wish he would do the depo videos incredibly average put out … the final was tonight he would be so good at reviewing them with us.
Flat earth conspiracies should not be banned and people should watch them. It teaches you what conspiracies look like, how convincing they can be even when you know it's wrong, and most importantly the way conspiracies are presented is nearly indistinguishable from the way reality is presented (in some cases) - meaning you need to learn to think, reason, and test for yourself.
In an ideal society, total freedom of speech would be allowed, and ideas would be freely exchanged and forced to hold up to scrutiny in debate, and only the best ideas would rise to the top and be a basis for implementing change. We don't live in that world, anymore.
@@TelvanniWizardMoneyGang We never really did live in that world. Tabloids were around for a long time, society said it was better to be silent than speak out and so on. Even still people tried their best and pushed for that world. We were getting close but we just have to keep push for that scrutiny and freedom, for properly debating at all.
@@TelvanniWizardMoneyGang the 90’s and early 00’s were a special time. Comedy was at its peak, there were no borders/boundaries/limits to speech. You could say whatever you wanted, most of us just had the decent mind to no what was overboard and polarizing, we weren’t a hateful population. We didn’t live on egg shells. We weren’t scared of words. Being offended was you’re own damn problem and it gave you a thicker skin, a great deal of humility. Now everything is too hypocritically soft and the world is now filled with special obstacles and oxymoronic demands. Too many parasites and purposeless people.
Johnny Depp, Ben Chew, Camille and all the legal team and ALL the people who testified for Depp , whether in an expert capacity or observer, seemed to be nice, decent and honest people…you can see it in their faces too… But ….The exact opposite was true for Amber and the experts and people on her side…
I am so happy for the win by JD's lawyers. Thank you for your comments. I'm so grateful that this seemed honest and relatable for many people. I wish we could have people like them for our congressional and Presidential leaders.
These guys are just a cut above heards lawyers. They don’t go on the attack with talk shows, they just respond after seeing and thinking about what heards lawyers said on tv. Smart move
THANK YOU for bringing up that one of the best things to happen is that someone became hugely appreciated (famous), over doing there jobs very well, PROFESSIONALLY! I personally see less & less of that in most places, young ppl need to see that sometimes & get inspired 😉 blessings all BTW new sub
If JD could so easily pay to have side of the story pushed on the internet and etc ,then why didnt he just do that instead of go to court? It is a lame argument that he is paying to promote his side of things..he would have done that all these years he has been dealing with it ,if it worked.AH lawyers need to just realize people saw through her BS, their BS and for once actually made proper reasoning with facts presented to them.
I'm beyond sick of AH and her team bringing up how "they won in the UK" the only thing the sun had to prove in the case is that they believed AH. Which isn't hard to prove. They didn't prove any DV happened they proved AH presented it to them "in a believable way" media companies also have a protection around them that a citizen does not. This trial in the US was completely different than the UK trial. Someone needs to teach AH's legal team the law!
As someone who suffers with addiction to pills and lots of things and that alone can end someone's career now adays. I love Johnny. He's a fucking rockstar and I hope that nothing negative comes from his massive victory and we don't give a Fuck about the uk
I'm a recovering addict, and lost alot, including my license to practice as a nurse with a bachelors degree. I found the rooms of Narcotics Anonymous and am getting my life back. The nursing license I don't intend on pursuing because I will always be labeled as an addict therefore won't be able to touch the narc box, but I didn't particularly care for the profession anyway. I'm a man and thats a field dominated by bitchy chatty women.
Best of luck in your fight. When you are ready, and you have to want it, please look in to suboxone. Saves lives, some very close to home... I'll be thinking of you and cheering for you. Leave a message here if you ever need anything or just want to talk. Be safe.
Try Kratom. Not as addictive and potency wise I would put it in between lortabs and Oxys. Cheaper too. Doesn’t have the horrible withdrawal suboxone and methadone does. It’s harder to get off those than pills, so please try Kratom first. Mild withdrawal compared to pills.
@@nmxsanchez telling people to get on suboxone, a drug way more potent than pills, I don’t agree with. I won’t even tell people on heroin to go rush and get in that. Withdrawals are worse than pills.
@@rowlandbuck2703 I take Methadone Everyday Prescribed, Adderall 60mgs a day, Klonopin 1mg twice a day, Gabapentin 1200mgs (2 600mg pills) 3 times a day, 1mg Clonidine 3 times a day, 100mgs of Seroquel at night. But there all legal and Prescribed and the
It's all about his reputation....BUT THAT doesn't mean he SHOULDN'T demand his justly awarded compensation. He should NOT even consider giving her slack.... The problem is she has always lived with enablers and always getting away with not taking accountability and escaping consequences. She needs to be forced to pay up! Or go to jail!! She has much to go to jail for....SOOOOO.
I recall the judge, multiple times, telling the jury when they were dismissed from court not to research anything about the case. I feel those words were used because of how prevalent this case was bound to be on social media. It would be hard to not see anything, short of not going on social media at all the entire time, but accidentally seeing something versus actively researching would be completely different things, wouldn't they?
Yeah it definately would, but seriously, it is not hard to avoid social media. I don't get why everyone is talking how hard it is to avoid. Sure I do not have instagram/tiktok or whatever and I think I could live without UA-cam for a few weeks. Surprisingly this is my superpower because I seem to be the only person without the need of having a judge to tell me? People might try for once to not use these narcissism promoting apps, too. It is ridiculous what the world has become.
I'm a bee keeper. I spend plenty of time outside, thanks. It might be wise to think about your words before you send them. You may not be as aware of things as you might think you are.
Wrong again. In fact, sometimes I am on social media while I'm outside. Like right now. I peruse various UA-cam channels that I'm subscribed to while I am enjoying the weather, or smoking weed outside. Don't worry, it's legal where I live. So, again, think about your words before you say them. You just may save yourself some personal embarrassment.
They keep trying to use the UK trial as proof, but the newspaper didn't have to prove he was a wife beater, they just had to prove there was no intent to defame him. In all honesty, the only thing they did wrong was assume Amber was a credible source, so I can understand why they won that trial.
You're spot on about Depp's legal team. they were great. Vasquez was brilliant. and she was promoted for it. Thats a good example to everyone, if you're good at your job, you'll get something out of it. Just my boomer opinion. but some things always ring true. No matter what age you are.
In cases like this even when found innocent, as the saying goes mud sticks. But I'm so happy for Johnny he deserved this Victory. Here in the UK laws make it hard to sue a newspaper, unfortunately & the laws should change.
I think the fact that the judges son worked for the Sun Newspaper and his wife has close personal ties to Rupert Murdoch didn't help either. He should have recused himself from the case with those clear conflicts of interest but he took the conscious decision not to, I wonder why. That's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the shady things to do with the judges conduct and decisions in that case. No wonder he retired shortly after, no comeback.
Oh my god I did not know this about the judges son. How was that even allowed there’s got to be conflict of interest there! I’m really shocked at that, that’s terrible !!
If not for you Zach she might have gotten away with it. You have done a service to the public. How proud your dearly departed mom must be. You have helped to end the gaslighting. I love you kid.
Keep in mind that if the jurors saw any evidence of internet opinion, it was because Elaine brought in an "expert" witness to testify about the hashtags. Turd's team brought the internet into this case, not Johnny's.
Am I the only one who wants this trainwreck to go on? When the trail came to an end I had a sort of cold turkey sensation, like 'what am I gonna watch now?' I NEED my fix!! 🤣🤣
Amber's lawyer said she didn't want a jury but that would have left it up to the judge and it would have been worse for her. The judge looked through all the bs and was annoyed by half the experts she bought in.
I think Johnny should absolutely pursue the damages from Amber and not be the nice guy. She had $7m from the divorce, she’ll get $2m for Aquaman, plus all of her previous earnings from movies and endorsements etc. Her and her friends were basically living out of Johnny’s pockets whilst they were together, so even with her lavish spending, legal fees and ‘ahem’ pledge/donations there’ll be plenty left in her bank account to keep the PR spin doctors going and keep finding ways to come after him. He’s better off taking that money off her and removing the ammunition. I’m surprised she’s had time to do interviews and not too busy prospecting a new mark to fund her appeal.
Ben showing his emotions proved to me how good a lawyer he is. He believed in Johnny 💯. The friendship that evolved between them was priceless. You have to believe in the person you are Representing and it makes the job much easier. Johnny didn’t hide things that happened. He didn’t hide his drug abuse, alcoholism, his comments/texts towards Amber. He showed himself as a real person that loves his children, has feelings for ex girlfriends. Had these girlfriends have had bad relationships with him, they would have said yes he’d showed abusive actions towards me. They didn’t because that’s not who he is. He lives different then most but it’s just who he is, like it or not. Johnny Depp doesn’t have scissors for hands, doesn’t eat chocolate all day …..etc Amber abuses who she loves, sister, ex girlfriend/partner/ husband and in public where people seen her, yet still tries to deny it. She has a real mental problem and needs a lot of help. No one shits in bed purposely, no one lies as she has. I would say abused women don’t sit on stand under oath and tell the jury how scared she was, how she was punched, hit repeatedly and not cry. Not have pictures, no medical records, no police reports. Johnny has no reports against him for domestic violence/abusive. Liars never win Amber. What goes around comes back around. Karma will get you Amber….
This trial was meant to be a time filler at work for me. Turned out to open my eyes and really fuck my brain. People are cruel. At least i have a new awareness moving forward
"About time" lol, she's 36/37. That's very early to make partner. Sounds like some ra-ra girl power nonsense. Camille got by on merit alone. Leave it at that
Amber didn’t have to prove any evidence she submitted in the UK case since she wasn’t a party in the UK case she was a witness. So she brought in tons of BS that didn’t have to be authenticated. The judge in the UK case also said that he ruled against Johnny BECAUSE Amber gave ALL her money to charity! So in his mind she had no motive to lie about the allegations. We know she never gave that money but karma caught up to her so Thank God for that!!!
I think he has more fans now. I always liked him, but NOT into Hollywood types at all. However, I not only appreciate him as a super topnotch actor, but learning more about him, I must confess, I am now a Johnny Depp fan!
The Sun Trial was Johnny suing the Sun and if they were within their rights to print the story, but Amber (the supposed victim) perjured herself and testified that it was true, why would the judge not side with the Sun?
Like you, I expected it to be a wash and both to be found defamed and they both be awarded a dollar. I am so very glad that it turned out the way that it did!
Training johnny with the antiwizard was GENIUS! That's like going into the hyperbolic time chamber, they were so prepared man. I love them because for once we can see a shining example of what doing your job looks like. I'd have no qualms about paying their number.
I had no opinion on Johnny Deep or Amber Heard(had no idea what her personality was like) and barely paid attention to everything that happened. I just heard that she accused him of abuse and thought oh that is disappointing. Could have cared less about the hearings, but then somehow I started watching bits and pieces and came in around the time Amber was being questioned. It didn't take long for me to see that she is a liar. And then when I heard the story about her pooping on the bed, on purposed, that was all I needed to know after that. What kind of person squats on the bed and poops? And the audios. She was clearly harassing him. One other thing I would like to say is, I wish people were paying as close attention the Jan 6th hearings as they did to Depp vs Heard. The video testimony for Jan 6th is crazy. People should know the truth of what happened that day.
If you accuse others of rigged trial and perjury it means that you are in that way yourself and didn’t AH said that the only thing she wanted was to live in peace with her little child, she was a mother and wanted to leave all this shit behind and go forward? Despite of that she’s nagging and accusing JD of rigged trial and risking an other defamation trial
I doubt that the jurors would want to listen to more stuff about the case when they got home, after having listened to it all day in real time, week after week.
I'm wondering if amber heard has to still pay 7 million to those charities as well as the 8.3 to Johnny Depp. Also I hear if she wants to appeal, and its gona cost a further 8 million. Can she afford any of this? It seems to me she is digging herself a very big hole.
The reason Depp lost his case against the Sun in the UK was NOT because the judge agreed that he was a wife beater, Savannah just stated an untruth about that case ! He only lost because the Sun had a source that they were using for their story, Amber was the one accusing him of being a wife beater so they had a source telling them what they reported, so then they did not defame him, really it was Amber who defamed him which is why he then sued her for defamation. The judge did NOT decide he was a wife beater. All the Sun had to prove was that they had a source and so good reason to believe it was true because AMBER was the one who said it and they were reporting what she lied and told them.
The jury was in the room when the actual evidence of this case was presented. How could someone offering their second hand opinion on that same evidence sway a juror that was actually present for the evidence? Social media did NOT affect the outcome. Fuq otta hee.
Just imagine how we will all react when she ghostwrites a book!! Bruv you hit the nail on the head! Yes we all know someone that we can relate to and its why we are so into this. Whether we know a Ima Turd who has the same character or a Johnny that is on the wrong end of n attack from their wives whenever she drinks. I know its easy to say but U do worry about how her daughter will grow up. She will have many issues to deal with.
And Elaine agreed to the date of the trial, knowing well there was going to be a break. If she didn’t want the break, she should have said, I don’t want that date. Now she goes around implying the break played a part in the verdict.
Dad I love you I’d love to have a convo how you literally changed mine and uncles lives to bond over something mutually enjoyable and couldn’t be more grateful for you and draw also so much inspiration to chase the dream of “do what you love” aspect of a career
The verdict was fair, the jury was fair, the judge was fair. The only reason she finds it not to be fair is because SHE LOST. Respect the verdict and move on.
She actually can’t ... she must double down or fade into obscurity and possibly even poverty -
I gather it didn’t go so well with Elon either - not sure if it’s true, but apparently there’s some brouhaha involving embryos he co-owned and wanted destroyed....
Probably after realising she has serious mental issues....and she won’t be able to trade on her looks forever.
That's what she's been saying that's all she wants... but everything shows that was just another lie
She is having a war with her ego about this 24/7 i bet
Well, there is another reason she feels it was unfair...she was proved to have LIED!!
Sadly Narcissists can’t respect.
The interviewer giving notice that her husband worked for the legal team in the past blew my mind. Hearing the most basic professional honesty in news was insane to me.
Some people think that her being devils advocate equals her support amber . When in all likelihood she is on Johnny side based on what you said
The interviewer was a little bit shady by saying her husband was not involved with 'this interview'. Begs the next question, so what was he involved with?
@@richarddevenezia8186 She literally said he worked with them consulting on an issue unrelated to the Depp case.
@@richarddevenezia8186 he either might just generally have consulted with Brown Rudnick (the law firm depps team works for) or he could have consulted with a different case involving depp
I’m so annoyed that Heard’s PR team keeps saying there is a social media campaign. No! There’s literally billions of smart people that watched the trial & saw the evidence. We are not “bots”. We just don’t like liars, we just don’t like you Amber. Quit pretending we are bots because you can’t comprehend billion of people around the world hate you Amber 🤦🏻♀️
It's crazy as well, because most of the Amber Heard supporting comments I saw were from bots.
Truth always hurts,does'ent it Amber.
I dont think billions of people saw the trial.
@@josiahclarke3535 youre right....Trillions... since im sure some aliens saw it too :P
Yep! And don't bots just go according to the algorithm and what's most trending anyway?
Amber and her team brought the internet into this case. They were talking about the hashtags; such as, Amberturd, etc. Then, she told the jury to go look her up and they can see how they were attacking her, saying put her baby in the microwave crap. She brought the internet up. Plus, the jurors saw the signs of the Deppheads when they left the courthouse. They seen the love and support for JD. So yes, it was everywhere because it was in and right outside the courthouse.
I also would like to say, prior to this verdict, JD was labeled a wife beater. He had to live with the humiliation for years. The media wrote all sorts of crap about him and HE'S had to deal with it. But he didn't smear Amber. He abided his time and stayed silent. The media, love and support was in her favor. Now that the tables are turned, you STILL continue to defame this man. Its your turn to find a quiet corner, hunker down and stay silent.
He should make her pay the money, garner her wages, something! Then he can donate the funds and show her how donations are performed. Just saying.
Exactly!! We all saw it! And I totally agree with you about making her pay that money!! To have it all automatically go straight to charity would be absolute justice!!
I completely agree with everything you said!! And like they say he's not in it for the money, he just wanted to clear his name! So I can imagine that he would donate that $2M, if he does ever see it anyway 😠 (it's too bad they can't change the UK ruling 😢 he deserves that too!!!)
I think all the evidence against AH, came from AH, other than the large group of people who gave character references.
She did donate!
Or wait, she pledged! So yea, she DONATED!
I’m so glad depp got out of this crap, as someone who was falsely accused of abuse and sa by the most toxic ex i’ve ever had in my life, makes me really happy to see him get through this. She almost ruined my life in college, it was fucked up. Good for him
I’d hoped that the Amberberg Iceberg would NOW let it go….Slink off to obscurity …. Crawl under the porch and lick her wounds like a sick cat…..but NO?….SHE won’t let it go, she’s planning to appeal…and keep it going.
EeLaine should take note that Johnny’s lawyer cost him $2.million….how much are HER defaming, unsubstantiated statements going to cost Amberberg? Nor should she be impugning the ethics of the Jury and the Judge and THEN claiming this case was decided in the court of public opinion of the Social media .
WTHECK is AMBER checking out Social Media ? She’s STILL under oath ALONG with ALL the witnesses AND the jury and ALL those who had testified and might be recalled to testify AGAIN….. EVERYONE and ALL of them were admonished NOT to access, or research social media , News etc..!
The worst offender of breaching this order, is Amber herself.
Yes, I've seen this happen to people that are really close to me and Amber Heard acted exactly like those toxic companions. I feel like most people are familiar with this type of behavior to some extent.
@@Chimchimchu that sucks, it’s so frustrating how these people just fake tears and make up convoluted stories to fish for sympathy and get people to gang up on the person they’re accusing, i can’t imagine being that shitty of a person :/
@@Kidcrowley Yeah, shit like that makes me want to get a written contract before doing anything physical with someone or even audio recordings during the deed to prove it was consensual but the latter seems a little creepy to me so probably just a contract. Though even with a contract they could just say they revoked/voided it whatever or changed their minds afterwards then said no... 😅
I’m so sorry that happened to you. That is abuse in its own right. That ex is a scummy person for doing that to you.
Camille is a fine example of what a true lawyer supposed to represent. Like a superwoman, she hammered down hard on Amber's gaslighting until it all came crashing down, because she had enough emotional intelligence to know a lie when she sees one. She used the truth like kryptonite to weaken Amber's phoney narrative. What a historic moment to witness IRT! Lawyer is the new superhero, watch out! ⚖️💪
More than that, it almost felt maternal... the fierceness that is almost at odds with her petite frame was tiger-mummyish.
she isnt a superwoman, shes a good lawyer that just so happens to be a woman. The less we objectify good behavior as "super" and *instead think of it as the simple proper way to conduct oneself, the more we will see people doing good things, imo.
Just ask her out already, 😆
It's insane how many articles I've seen try and spin this whole case as if Johnny is losing support or that AH was in the right
It’s rage clicks. They just want the money from baiting people to view their stuff. Sad world we live in where this is a common occurrence
It's probably the work of Amber's overpaid publicity company she newly hired.
No one is even arguing Johnny doesn’t hold any blame either, just that AH was clearly lying and being manipulative.
Johnny Depp is not losing support He has too many fans backing him.
@@minnchi5125 I wonder if they're getting paid in real money or in pledges/AmberBucks...
The main thing I feel killed her case was how gruesome the acts of violence he afflicted onto her but then had pictures of her the exact next day after with absolutely no marks at all and instead of admitting to little things she was obviously caught not telling the truth but building it out be way more horrendous then original statements
You make a good point. I kept thinking about Rhianna's face and how she canceled gigs and needed surgery after that beating, and it didn't seem near as graphic as what Amber was talking about. It just doesn't add up.
The jury analysed the evidence and 7 weeks of testimonies. Like you said, no proof, no medical records, some pics of a very small possibly fake bruise or a botox bruise, cops didnt see anything except a bunch of leeching lowlifers chilling in the couch, property damage without knowing who did it, audio tapes of amber heard being abusive & admitting to it & saying no one will believe him because he's a man, amber heard cheating on johnny and laughing about it and so much more.
Social media can influence some opinions sure but cannot change the evidence the jury was looking into for 7 weeks.
@@AmberGraves80 Yeah Amber decided to describe things happening that would have put her in a coma or outright killed her with how often she said it was happening.
@@LordVader1094 She got braindamaged on her own.
As usual, day and night between her team and people and his. They are genuine, professional, respectful and focus on facts and evidence.
to be fair amber's team has a duty to be zealous advocates for her so it makes sense some of her bs would wash off on them. I don't think they're shitty people they just had to defend one
@@PianuReeves I disagree.... Granny elaine has stood by amber at least since day one of her nasty lies and accusations when she got the RESTRAINING ORDER and went on promoting the metoo movement with photos ....and you can see that for a fact if you look up photos of when amber was acting like the face of the movement. Her sister and Elaine were in the photos all mg side of her. Elaine knows exactly who she has been representing. They both think alike.
I want people to notice that Ben and Camille did not speak about what JOHNNY said to them as it is under client privilege.
They spoke about how others saw him (hearsay) and how they think he feels"sense of relief" (speculation)
Meanwhile Elaine's went full quotation on what Her client told Her in private.
See the stark difference? It's the very first question and Elaine failed or it was a calculated move with consent from Amber which shows the Manipulative side of the whole issue.
Objection! Hearsay.
You should look at a channel called the black belt Barrister . He is a UK lawyer doing a petition to get the UK case to be looked at by judges because he doesn't feel that Johnny got a fair trial. The link to the petition is in his video talking about the this
@Carl Gunderson did the judges son own The Sun? I heard he was just an employee at their sister company... Either way though the judge should've recused himself from the case due to his personal bias. Total bullturd!
@Carl Gunderson it would be 3 judges I think he said who would look at it . Never know he has legal reasons to reopen it .
@Carl Gunderson it does matter , not only did he have to pay the sun money the ruling wasn't right and it was unfair. The judge also used laws and rules but didn't apply them to both sides to equally. Right and wrong matter so does honestly.
@Carl Gunderson There is more than one Judge in the UK - have it looked at by a 2nd and 3rd if necessary, but for this bias to be so well-known is enough grounds to have the case completely dismissed... IF we were talking about the case of Heard vs. Depp.
That trial was for the SUN vs. DEPP and while the statements from the judge were damning (and downright egregious) at the end of the day the rag that is the SUN can apparently do what it pleases. Is that fair or just? No and that's what BBB is trying to resolve with their petition in the long-term.
I agree. I'm happy to see that our culture embraced a few new celebrities for actually being good at their job.
I like to think that we're heading back to the Age of Enlightenment when the rockstars were the scientists whose lecture halls were packed with people wanting to see the next big discovery.
why does chat just talks about camile and " oh my queen camile" and no one references bejamin ,bunch of double standarts bull crap around here, fk these simps for real lol
@The Rotten💯 Unlikely. They, legacy media, fucked up Gen Z real bad. It's all about who can claim the most victim-hood.
I have totally been affected by this BS. I despise Amber. When she acknowledges to the world that she lied, abused JD and comes to terms that she needs therapy. No will will ever take her seriously. It's done.
BS baffles the brain. Keep going Amber you'll have them believing you in no time. Plus Elon's coin supports you. You are a smart woman
@@frankmozzone1338 it's crazy even elon got fooled. I wonder how he felt when she wouldn't destroy the embryos. I think Amber had that baby to get at least some level of support from Elon
@@frankmozzone1338lol oh no doubt about it! You just wait! The whole world is gon’ be curtailin’ to belieb awlthu whamun
Why have you been affected? Serious question? I was abused by someone just like Amber but I don’t consider this as having personally effected me so I’m curious why it’s effected you?
@@IratePuffin I think they mean it pissed them off, made them feel repulsed enough to actually feel a negative feeling? could be wrong, obviously it's my own interpretation, I'm just saying I don't think it's a direct thing, more like an indirect, reactionary thing?
I hope she says something that Johnny can sue her for, again. Isn’t she continuing to defame him by saying the exact same things on national television after they were PROVEN to be false? How is this different from the OP ED? I understand people believe him now, but this still shouldn’t be allowed if it can in any way hurt his image. Especially the way they are promoting these interviews like they’re sitting down with this wrongly accused woman and making her out to be a victim.
Exactly my thoughts after the first Interview by Elaine. How can you lose a defamation trial and then proceed to defame the person at least indirectly in saying the whole thing was rigged, without any evidence by the way? I can understand why JD wouldn't sue her, he wants to get over it. But I think the some authorities should intervene here in some way or the other.
i agree besides the last sentence. This interviewer is clearly on JDs side if anything.
Yes, she is opening herself up to further litigation. JD can file an injunction against her to make her stop saying these things publicly, with criminal penalties if she does.
I sincerely hope he does that.
No damages though. Because nobody believes her.
@@MrRavellon A lot of people believe her.
The judgement against Depp here in the UK was done by a judge and not a jury which straight away is complete BS and the trial here was also missing a lot of evidence that the judge excluded from the case and those are the ‘only’ reasons he lost. I really hope he now asks for a retrial and the judge is investigated as to why the evidence was excluded and how he came to his conclusion because from what I’ve read there was something iffy about the whole thing. I can’t say what as I’ve not read enough on it yet but I intend to. I know the burden of proof is different here and to have excluded evidence that could have led to a different outcome just isn’t right no matter what side of the pond it’s on.
It wasn't against Amber Heard either but a "news agency". Freedom of press is not just a thing in the US. I doubt the trial would be any different even if retried. Op-eds are opinion pieces and as such they only need the slightest sliver of plausible deniability to prevail against defamation cases.
The judge was corrupt...For instance his son had a conflict of interest regarding the SUN. He probably was also an old pervert who allowed heard to charm him. What did Depp think was gonna happen as an American trying to win a case against a newspaper in a foreign country??? The original case againest the SUN was a kangaroo court. Depp shouldn't of even attempted to sue in the UK...
Who cares what nu-Iran does in it's courts
I read that the Judge's son worked for the publication that printed the story. I would think that's a huge conflict of interest on both sides of the pond!
Her argument is that she was tried on social media and that was unfair while ignoring the fact the entire reason for the suit was her using media and social media to destroy him without a trial.
Exactly!!!
Not everyone is obsessed with social media. Amber’s the type who reads all about herself.
To blame the jury is tacky.
Amber is one of those people that google herself.
@@johnair1 Nah, they have their PR team google their name for them
My ex husband pushed me against a door with a large glass pane in it, cutting my shoulders, back, and the back of both my heels when the glass fell down and my feet were against the door.
He then reached up and grabbed the top door frame , broken glass and all, and ripped the door in his violent, usual, narcissistic raging ,and tore the door from it's hinges.
He ran to his parents who lived one block away, and showing them his gash in his hand, upon their suggestion, called the cops on me.
Told the cop I PUSHED HIM THROUGH THE DOOR , he lied, I went to jail.
But first had to be taken to a hospital for my cuts.
Did he go to jail?
No, a restraining order was placed, I couldn't go home, couldn't see my children, I'll never forget this even though it happened 22 years ago.
Why was he so enraged and vindictive?
Because I told him I met a man who didn't abuse me verbally, emotionally, and physically and I wanted a divorce.
This is the way they are, when he knew I no longer wanted to be with him, I wanted to be happy, he lost me and this was his way of getting even.
Amber knew Johnny's was done with her , with her abuse, narcs hate losing.
They hate losing their supply.
My ex lied, ruined my nursing hopes, I was now labeled a abuser, couldn't even get a job as a nurses aid, I know how it feels to have this lie ruin one's life .
Social media didn't have a thing to do with my support for Johnny,
My support was from clearly seeing through Amber's vicious , malicious , motives and lies.
Johnny was the victim and wanted to prove it, he did, and his heart is at peace.
@Jen E. Scott what he did was have a smear campaign against you. Turn your family and children against you.
Narcs ( narcissists) hate losing !
They'll mistreat and abuse you , yet don't want anyone else loving you, giving you what they withhold hatefully and selfishly .
My ex told my children when I left the home that I didn't want to be with them, and that I was off being a whore ( totally false)
I learned this years later
Yet he wonders why our children loathe him and have the upmost disdain for him.
They are adults now and know the Truth,
But I have learned narcs love smearing you,
They project the hate and shame they hide inside.
So sorry that happened to you.
We become better , not bitter.
Being happy With Out them drives them nuts!
Keep moving ahead to be happy and at peace ♥️
How are you now?
@Jen E. Scott smearing us to our children is mental and emotional abuse towards them,
If they're young , and told mommy's a whore and doesn't love you wounds them, scars them,
Only when they're older with eyes to see, do they become free , but not completely.
The torment and pain leaves it's poison
My children ( now young adults have numerous issues that only God and good therapy can mend .
The disdain and hate they have for my ex is insurmountable.
One son has numerous domestic assault charges on his record, and hates his dad.
And cannot truly love any woman .
His heart is hardened
I just read your comment, hope you are doing great
Camille Vasquez, Judge Azcarate and Dr. Curry are truly heroes of this case. Well spoken women, who are an inspiration to girls out there to get an education and take pride in the profession of their choosing.
These are the kind of women we need to see more and needs to be place on a pedestal.....Not those only fans one who were able to get millions by showing some skin
@@marc1981tremblay Same thing could be said about men. I don’t wanna see Jake paul and his like, Benjamin is a great lawyer too. Bad take.
The problem with this "social media influence" defense by AH is that people were commenting on the same thing the jurors were stuck for hours listening to. Who would want to torture themselves and watch the same thing again?
*if the jury went online and searched for info on this case then they would've given Depp $50M just in punitive damages!! And they definitely wouldn't have found him liable for one of the counts on Heard's counterclaim! Cause they would've came across the call Rocky Pennington made to 911 where she said someone in her building is being abused but she didn't know her name and wished to remain anonymous! Pffft. In court AH's team argued that I.O made one call only so the second time officers came out was probably just some sort of mistake or that they came to get a statement from Amber. It's a good thing the 911 call was put online so people know the truth of what actually happened. Sucks for the jury though cause JD's team couldn't bring in the fact that RP was the one who placed that call so they didn't have the totality of the evidence to make that judgement. Absolute bullturd!*
This is an excellent point I've never thought about. They would have also known Virginia caps their punitive damages at 350k since that was something talked about by a lot of streamers.
ben chew is so gangsta, and camile is queen. they give lawyers a good name
You know what must be most hurtful for Amber Heard? The fact that she got destroyed by a lawyer that is not only smarter, but also better looking than her. When all you have is your good looks, that must be devastating.
Ambers looks are quickly starting to go. It’s almost like leading that toxic and evil lifestyle is slowly eating away at her appearance.
why does chat just talks about camile and " oh my queen camile" and no one references bejamin ,bunch of double standarts bull crap around here, fk these simps for real lol
best part is that Camile Vasquez is a year older than Amber Turd, but Amber looks 10 years older than Camile. XD
Gross comment
Do you really lack the self-awareness to realize that a comment like this, besides being stupid, makes you come off as a weirdo?
Man, Amber's Lawyers really shit the bed with this case.
Unironically, so did Amber.
Are you here all week?
I put more on the blame on Heard than the lawyers. Rottenborn was dealing with what he got and tbh if it wasn't for him then Heard wouldn't have gotten that bone thrown by the jury (though rumors are stating that the jury threw that bone for Heard because of a stubborn juror who didn't want Heard to completely lose for fear of an appeal). His closing was decent given with what he got and he didn't go on live television and bad-mouth the jury or the judge compared to Elaine. He is truly a professional who has been dealt with a bad hand and a lying uncooperative client and thus had to use certain trial tactics to edge out a win. Elaine's partner, Nadelhaft, looked to be done with the case too and is also not going on to television or media complaining, but he is Elaine's partner but I no doubt think he is probably finding a way to quietly withdraw to another firm at this rate.
Elaine is a whole other story.
@@coolyeh1017 I don't think she should have gotten the 2 million tbh. With all of the stuff that the jury wasn't able to see...it seems like at least rocky was in on setting stuff up. I don't think it was all of her friends that helped but a couple of them at the very least.
@@PineappleBaconPizza even as a JD supporter we gotta stick to the facts. That statement by waldman was WAY over the top, especially since there were so many elements about it that couldnt all be proven.
I think most people in a jury that took an oath to follow a judges instructions to not view shit about the case that they would follow that instruction. Some people do still have integrity. I am sure people like Amber and her team don't think so. I am so tired of these losers claiming they didn't lose it was rigged. I wish the media would quit shoving this bullshit in our faces.
It is prety on brand for amber. The cops lied, the nurse lied, the manager lied, the bodyguard lied, the judge which was a woman was biased against her.
And finally the jury disregard the instruction and were influenced by the internet.
Yet it was ok for her to use pledge and donate synonymously. The video on her phone being leaked had nothing to do with her. Those photos had diffrent lighting.
I mean, the jury were being paid almost no money for their time - if they took and oath, sat through 8 hours of this for 4 days every week for 6 weeks, why would they throw all of that in the trash just to go and open up TikTok? The jury was already there in the courtroom and saw everything with their own eyes - why would they be "wrongfully influenced" by something that they've already seen, just because it's on TikTok? It doesn't make sense, and it's unprofessional for a lawyer like Elaine to suggest that the court and the jury didn't do their job. It's easy to accuse someone of being wrongfully influenced - but you can't just accuse a whole entire jury of 7 different people of breaking the rules, just because the verdict is inconvenient to you.
I absolutely agree. I haven't been a juror but I was called in to interview for jury duty along with probably 50 other people. There is a whole process to select jurors and both sides have to agree on each juror. One of the first anxieties I had was "I hope I make the right decisions if they choose me. I don't want to be responsible for an innocent getting punished." There is so much stress because you literally could do more harm than good if you don't follow instructions. Amber's lawyer going around saying the jury didn't do their part correctly is abhorrent. They can appeal but I don't expect any changes.
@@vahidfarahani5142 and have Eve bartlow at home watching, tweeting and twisting things to tell Amber each night .
They have no integrity and cannot imagine it in others.
One thing a lot of wasn't talked about during the whole trial was; Whenever your "abusive partner" is allegedly abusing you physically and sexually, they always do those things regardless of what happens. The evidence suggests Johnny broke cupboards and smashed glasses in the house before he realised he's getting taped. He continues throughout the same procedure afterwards.
That is the sign of a person who projects their anger towards objects that are not their significant other. I don't know why this is not mentioned more. Basic psychology.
And he tried to leave.
So to train for trial they put him against the Anti-Wizard Wayne Dennison? Now I feel sorry for Ben Rottenborne because he came undermanned and unprepared! Johnny came in with a Teflon disposition because Dennison gave him a crash course in deconstruction! Man, I would fear that law firm and their might!
Fairly certain the social media was reacting to the stuff inside the trial most of the time, reacting to Amber Heard, reacting to Johnny, Elaine, Camille, Ben, all the same people the jury watched. The fact that they came to the same conclusion isn’t exactly surprising
“domestic violence has no gender””don’t try to destroy someone’s life with lies when yours can be destroyed with the truth””don’t play the victim to situations you created and then flip the story to manipulate people to believing you’re innocent”
My mom did and ppl hate her. Ppl like Amber end up dying alone and bitter from burning all bridges the built just to get ahead temporarily
Derek. I agree. Don't lie.
This attorney lives in coocoo land , the judge told everyone to go home ,not look on social media or talk to friends and families .but did Amber's team listen ? To know that everyone hates her she must have searched and looked on social media . Johnny kept his calm and good for his attorneys to win this case . The thing with the Sun Paper here in UK should not have pasted those words about Johnny .I bet now they feel stupid seeing Amber lie and hearing those audios . Her demonic laugh alone puts people off . And I thought the UK case should not have been mentioned in this court but her attorney kept throwing it at the judge and juries . If Johnny beat Amber a whole 5 years ,she won't have just that fake bruise ,ask any abused woman out there .their body damaged not to forget their soul and spirit and the depressed state of mind , Amber showed none of this . These two attorneys will be hired , not Elaine with her mantra ( But he lost in UK, but he lost in UK ) ..loser .
In the UK trial AH was a witnessed that was never cross examined.
Additionally to accuse the jury of being swayed by social media has to prove they both 1) actively seeked it 2) have the media sway their opinion.
I'm a island boy and I'm just tryna make it
No way
Depp's legal team have so much integrity, it's so nice to see decent people doing a great job.
I just discovered this guy when the trial happened and gotta say he is hilarious. Had to subscribe.
Same lol.
Yep, me too.. lol
Asmon is one of the only streamers I watch, but the trial shit is "yawn" good outcome for Johnny though
Been watching him for years for his WoW content. I never even thought about his coverage of the trial would bring new viewers. Neat!
Same I’m watching the trial all over again (except amber on stand with her lawyers) and cracking up laughing with his reactions . Hysterical I wish he would do the depo videos incredibly average put out … the final was tonight he would be so good at reviewing them with us.
Flat earth conspiracies should not be banned and people should watch them.
It teaches you what conspiracies look like, how convincing they can be even when you know it's wrong, and most importantly the way conspiracies are presented is nearly indistinguishable from the way reality is presented (in some cases) - meaning you need to learn to think, reason, and test for yourself.
In an ideal society, total freedom of speech would be allowed, and ideas would be freely exchanged and forced to hold up to scrutiny in debate, and only the best ideas would rise to the top and be a basis for implementing change.
We don't live in that world, anymore.
@@TelvanniWizardMoneyGang We never really did live in that world. Tabloids were around for a long time, society said it was better to be silent than speak out and so on. Even still people tried their best and pushed for that world. We were getting close but we just have to keep push for that scrutiny and freedom, for properly debating at all.
@@TelvanniWizardMoneyGang the 90’s and early 00’s were a special time. Comedy was at its peak, there were no borders/boundaries/limits to speech. You could say whatever you wanted, most of us just had the decent mind to no what was overboard and polarizing, we weren’t a hateful population. We didn’t live on egg shells. We weren’t scared of words. Being offended was you’re own damn problem and it gave you a thicker skin, a great deal of humility. Now everything is too hypocritically soft and the world is now filled with special obstacles and oxymoronic demands. Too many parasites and purposeless people.
@@TelvanniWizardMoneyGang Name one year, one month, one day where we ever lived in that world, lmao.
@@TelvanniWizardMoneyGang If anything we're slowly progressing towards that
You know you did a good job when the company make you a partner, congrats Miss Vasquez
Johnny Depp, Ben Chew, Camille and all the legal team and ALL the people who testified for Depp , whether in an expert capacity or observer, seemed to be nice, decent and honest people…you can see it in their faces too…
But ….The exact opposite was true for Amber and the experts and people on her side…
I am so happy for the win by JD's lawyers. Thank you for your comments. I'm so grateful that this seemed honest and relatable for many people. I wish we could have people like them for our congressional and Presidential leaders.
These guys are just a cut above heards lawyers. They don’t go on the attack with talk shows, they just respond after seeing and thinking about what heards lawyers said on tv. Smart move
Dignified people were praised for winning against evil, that is what is beautiful.
Fucking hell I love Asmon’s content. He is the News Channel 5 online edition
Same. I didn't even know about this guy until this trial. Now I've even watched his gaming streams and I don't even play videos lol
@@jgobroho Don't play games but javelin Assassins Creed pic? Hmmmmm
A lot of people would have been real quick to try cancel Johnny Depp if the evidence wasn’t in his favour he didn’t win cause of his popularity.
The vast majority of what I saw on the internet was what the jury saw in the courtroom.
Ben is such a fantastic person ❤
THANK YOU for bringing up that one of the best things to happen is that someone became hugely appreciated (famous), over doing there jobs very well, PROFESSIONALLY! I personally see less & less of that in most places, young ppl need to see that sometimes & get inspired 😉 blessings all
BTW new sub
She carried so hard, she even took the time to teach law to the other lawyers on the other side during the trial. 😂🤣
Johnny owes Camille all the megapints.
Well he likely chose them and paid them millions so...
I have personally been affected by similar shit. Ppl like her are horrible and the truth matters.
If JD could so easily pay to have side of the story pushed on the internet and etc ,then why didnt he just do that instead of go to court? It is a lame argument that he is paying to promote his side of things..he would have done that all these years he has been dealing with it ,if it worked.AH lawyers need to just realize people saw through her BS, their BS and for once actually made proper reasoning with facts presented to them.
Mainstream media is still supporting her and portraying her as a victim
It's shameful really
I'm beyond sick of AH and her team bringing up how "they won in the UK" the only thing the sun had to prove in the case is that they believed AH. Which isn't hard to prove. They didn't prove any DV happened they proved AH presented it to them "in a believable way" media companies also have a protection around them that a citizen does not. This trial in the US was completely different than the UK trial. Someone needs to teach AH's legal team the law!
As someone who suffers with addiction to pills and lots of things and that alone can end someone's career now adays. I love Johnny. He's a fucking rockstar and I hope that nothing negative comes from his massive victory and we don't give a Fuck about the uk
I'm a recovering addict, and lost alot, including my license to practice as a nurse with a bachelors degree. I found the rooms of Narcotics Anonymous and am getting my life back. The nursing license I don't intend on pursuing because I will always be labeled as an addict therefore won't be able to touch the narc box, but I didn't particularly care for the profession anyway. I'm a man and thats a field dominated by bitchy chatty women.
Best of luck in your fight. When you are ready, and you have to want it, please look in to suboxone. Saves lives, some very close to home... I'll be thinking of you and cheering for you. Leave a message here if you ever need anything or just want to talk. Be safe.
Try Kratom. Not as addictive and potency wise I would put it in between lortabs and Oxys. Cheaper too.
Doesn’t have the horrible withdrawal suboxone and methadone does. It’s harder to get off those than pills, so please try Kratom first. Mild withdrawal compared to pills.
@@nmxsanchez telling people to get on suboxone, a drug way more potent than pills, I don’t agree with. I won’t even tell people on heroin to go rush and get in that. Withdrawals are worse than pills.
@@rowlandbuck2703 I take Methadone Everyday Prescribed, Adderall 60mgs a day, Klonopin 1mg twice a day, Gabapentin 1200mgs (2 600mg pills) 3 times a day, 1mg Clonidine 3 times a day, 100mgs of Seroquel at night. But there all legal and Prescribed and the
It's all about his reputation....BUT THAT doesn't mean he SHOULDN'T demand his justly awarded compensation. He should NOT even consider giving her slack.... The problem is she has always lived with enablers and always getting away with not taking accountability and escaping consequences. She needs to be forced to pay up! Or go to jail!! She has much to go to jail for....SOOOOO.
I recall the judge, multiple times, telling the jury when they were dismissed from court not to research anything about the case. I feel those words were used because of how prevalent this case was bound to be on social media. It would be hard to not see anything, short of not going on social media at all the entire time, but accidentally seeing something versus actively researching would be completely different things, wouldn't they?
Yeah it definately would, but seriously, it is not hard to avoid social media. I don't get why everyone is talking how hard it is to avoid. Sure I do not have instagram/tiktok or whatever and I think I could live without UA-cam for a few weeks. Surprisingly this is my superpower because I seem to be the only person without the need of having a judge to tell me? People might try for once to not use these narcissism promoting apps, too. It is ridiculous what the world has become.
Avoiding social media is hard? Go touch some grass.
I'm a bee keeper. I spend plenty of time outside, thanks. It might be wise to think about your words before you send them. You may not be as aware of things as you might think you are.
@@TheRealVenna you don't go outside though. You stay on social media.
Wrong again. In fact, sometimes I am on social media while I'm outside. Like right now. I peruse various UA-cam channels that I'm subscribed to while I am enjoying the weather, or smoking weed outside. Don't worry, it's legal where I live. So, again, think about your words before you say them. You just may save yourself some personal embarrassment.
They keep trying to use the UK trial as proof, but the newspaper didn't have to prove he was a wife beater, they just had to prove there was no intent to defame him. In all honesty, the only thing they did wrong was assume Amber was a credible source, so I can understand why they won that trial.
These two doing their best to bring honor to the lawyer profession!!! Que buena gente!
You're spot on about Depp's legal team. they were great. Vasquez was brilliant. and she was promoted for it. Thats a good example to everyone, if you're good at your job, you'll get something out of it. Just my boomer opinion. but some things always ring true. No matter what age you are.
Very true. No matter the age, that's how it should be.
Depps other lawyer, the one who cross examined Dr Speigel. that guy was a beast. it didn't help that Speigel himself looked like the 5th Marx brother.
In cases like this even when found innocent, as the saying goes mud sticks. But I'm so happy for Johnny he deserved this Victory. Here in the UK laws make it hard to sue a newspaper, unfortunately & the laws should change.
I think the fact that the judges son worked for the Sun Newspaper and his wife has close personal ties to Rupert Murdoch didn't help either. He should have recused himself from the case with those clear conflicts of interest but he took the conscious decision not to, I wonder why.
That's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the shady things to do with the judges conduct and decisions in that case. No wonder he retired shortly after, no comeback.
@@Sevarrius Totally agree with you, plus the judge retired soon after the UK case was over is also sus too.
Oh my god I did not know this about the judges son. How was that even allowed there’s got to be conflict of interest there! I’m really shocked at that, that’s terrible !!
If not for you Zach she might have gotten away with it. You have done a service to the public. How proud your dearly departed mom must be. You have helped to end the gaslighting. I love you kid.
That Jury was smart enough to see they were being lied to ! It was evident from what we saw she lied over and over !
The interviewer definitely does not believe AMBER HEARD.
Warner Bros sure know how to pick their "heroes", speaking of Amber Heard and Ezra Miller.
Keep in mind that if the jurors saw any evidence of internet opinion, it was because Elaine brought in an "expert" witness to testify about the hashtags. Turd's team brought the internet into this case, not Johnny's.
That's true 🤔🤔
Am I the only one who wants this trainwreck to go on? When the trail came to an end I had a sort of cold turkey sensation, like 'what am I gonna watch now?' I NEED my fix!! 🤣🤣
Could she come up with any stupider questions?? Johnny had the truth on his side and Amber didn't!
Amber's lawyer said she didn't want a jury but that would have left it up to the judge and it would have been worse for her. The judge looked through all the bs and was annoyed by half the experts she bought in.
2:45 Hats off to Ayjayyy in chat for saying "BIG LEAGUE CHEW" XD Amazing. Had me almost choking on my damn oreos.
I think Johnny should absolutely pursue the damages from Amber and not be the nice guy. She had $7m from the divorce, she’ll get $2m for Aquaman, plus all of her previous earnings from movies and endorsements etc. Her and her friends were basically living out of Johnny’s pockets whilst they were together, so even with her lavish spending, legal fees and ‘ahem’ pledge/donations there’ll be plenty left in her bank account to keep the PR spin doctors going and keep finding ways to come after him. He’s better off taking that money off her and removing the ammunition.
I’m surprised she’s had time to do interviews and not too busy prospecting a new mark to fund her appeal.
Ben showing his emotions proved to me how good a lawyer he is. He believed in Johnny 💯. The friendship that evolved between them was priceless. You have to believe in the person you are Representing and it makes the job much easier. Johnny didn’t hide things that happened. He didn’t hide his drug abuse, alcoholism, his comments/texts towards Amber. He showed himself as a real person that loves his children, has feelings for ex girlfriends. Had these girlfriends have had bad relationships with him, they would have said yes he’d showed abusive actions towards me. They didn’t because that’s not who he is. He lives different then most but it’s just who he is, like it or not. Johnny Depp doesn’t have scissors for hands, doesn’t eat chocolate all day …..etc Amber abuses who she loves, sister, ex girlfriend/partner/ husband and in public where people seen her, yet still tries to deny it. She has a real mental problem and needs a lot of help. No one shits in bed purposely, no one lies as she has. I would say abused women don’t sit on stand under oath and tell the jury how scared she was, how she was punched, hit repeatedly and not cry. Not have pictures, no medical records, no police reports. Johnny has no reports against him for domestic violence/abusive. Liars never win Amber. What goes around comes back around. Karma will get you Amber….
This trial was meant to be a time filler at work for me. Turned out to open my eyes and really fuck my brain. People are cruel. At least i have a new awareness moving forward
"About time" lol, she's 36/37. That's very early to make partner. Sounds like some ra-ra girl power nonsense.
Camille got by on merit alone. Leave it at that
He also had his drug use flattened for the world which defamed him alone and that's not right.
Amber didn’t have to prove any evidence she submitted in the UK case since she wasn’t a party in the UK case she was a witness. So she brought in tons of BS that didn’t have to be authenticated. The judge in the UK case also said that he ruled against Johnny BECAUSE Amber gave ALL her money to charity! So in his mind she had no motive to lie about the allegations. We know she never gave that money but karma caught up to her so Thank God for that!!!
In the uk case amber heard was friends with the judge was having dinner meets with him and his wife and alsorts
I think he has more fans now. I always liked him, but NOT into Hollywood types at all. However, I not only appreciate him as a super topnotch actor, but learning more about him, I must confess, I am now a Johnny Depp fan!
13:00 Trust, but verify.
Work under the assumption that everything is true until you know it is true.
The Sun Trial was Johnny suing the Sun and if they were within their rights to print the story, but Amber (the supposed victim) perjured herself and testified that it was true, why would the judge not side with the Sun?
Like you, I expected it to be a wash and both to be found defamed and they both be awarded a dollar. I am so very glad that it turned out the way that it did!
The UK trial was between Johnny and The Sun. There for not admissible in the US.
This video has audio, the previous one has not
Training johnny with the antiwizard was GENIUS! That's like going into the hyperbolic time chamber, they were so prepared man. I love them because for once we can see a shining example of what doing your job looks like. I'd have no qualms about paying their number.
why would someone who sat in the actual trial for weeks change their opinion because of tick tock opinions
Worked out why Camille looks so good. She doesn't have them darn caterpillar eyebrows.
At least this video has audio
I had no opinion on Johnny Deep or Amber Heard(had no idea what her personality was like) and barely paid attention to everything that happened. I just heard that she accused him of abuse and thought oh that is disappointing. Could have cared less about the hearings, but then somehow I started watching bits and pieces and came in around the time Amber was being questioned. It didn't take long for me to see that she is a liar. And then when I heard the story about her pooping on the bed, on purposed, that was all I needed to know after that. What kind of person squats on the bed and poops? And the audios. She was clearly harassing him.
One other thing I would like to say is, I wish people were paying as close attention the Jan 6th hearings as they did to Depp vs Heard. The video testimony for Jan 6th is crazy. People should know the truth of what happened that day.
If you accuse others of rigged trial and perjury it means that you are in that way yourself and didn’t AH said that the only thing she wanted was to live in peace with her little child, she was a mother and wanted to leave all this shit behind and go forward? Despite of that she’s nagging and accusing JD of rigged trial and risking an other defamation trial
0:38 Such a great take. I love that you brought this up. Well said, my dude
Supported by all fans of justice.... not just Johnny Depp fans
I doubt that the jurors would want to listen to more stuff about the case when they got home, after having listened to it all day in real time, week after week.
Anyone have a problem viewing the Asmon reactions to ah video it’s no loading.
Yes
My guess is she already tried to clam it.
Yeah it says it’s a stream for some reason
yes! i opened in my browser can see it there
Sure am
The Good gets rewarded. The hard work gets rewarded. Truth comes out.
I'm wondering if amber heard has to still pay 7 million to those charities as well as the 8.3 to Johnny Depp. Also I hear if she wants to appeal, and its gona cost a further 8 million. Can she afford any of this? It seems to me she is digging herself a very big hole.
The reason Depp lost his case against the Sun in the UK was NOT because the judge agreed that he was a wife beater, Savannah just stated an untruth about that case ! He only lost because the Sun had a source that they were using for their story, Amber was the one accusing him of being a wife beater so they had a source telling them what they reported, so then they did not defame him, really it was Amber who defamed him which is why he then sued her for defamation. The judge did NOT decide he was a wife beater. All the Sun had to prove was that they had a source and so good reason to believe it was true because AMBER was the one who said it and they were reporting what she lied and told them.
The other video doesn't have audio, on mobile atleast.
The jury was in the room when the actual evidence of this case was presented. How could someone offering their second hand opinion on that same evidence sway a juror that was actually present for the evidence? Social media did NOT affect the outcome. Fuq otta hee.
Just imagine how we will all react when she ghostwrites a book!! Bruv you hit the nail on the head! Yes we all know someone that we can relate to and its why we are so into this. Whether we know a Ima Turd who has the same character or a Johnny that is on the wrong end of n attack from their wives whenever she drinks. I know its easy to say but U do worry about how her daughter will grow up. She will have many issues to deal with.
And Elaine agreed to the date of the trial, knowing well there was going to be a break. If she didn’t want the break, she should have said, I don’t want that date. Now she goes around implying the break played a part in the verdict.
Dad I love you I’d love to have a convo how you literally changed mine and uncles lives to bond over something mutually enjoyable and couldn’t be more grateful for you and draw also so much inspiration to chase the dream of “do what you love” aspect of a career
I love you to son
@FL EX He is simping on Asmond.
@FL EX he’s my son
Amen brother.
@@pulseofme6884 I’ll be your new daddy, don’t worry
Ben Chew has such a nice face. He’s a pleasant man. He looks like an honest man…At his age, his personality is written upon his face…
Camila honestly a different level of woman
Preach
Keeper
17:06 why you pause it like that 🤣🤣🤣🤣 he looks like he about to laugh so hard!!!! Or taking a dump!!! 🤣🤣