Johnny Depp Lawyer SHUTS DOWN Amber Heard Lawyer with NON-STOP Objections | A͏s͏mongold Reacts

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,3 тис.

  • @carlriggs5413
    @carlriggs5413 2 роки тому +823

    The discipline of the person under subpoena is admirable. You can note the way he pauses after every question is asked very deliberately to give JD's lawyer a chance to interrupt. 10/10 witness.

    • @Bludgeoned2DEATH2
      @Bludgeoned2DEATH2 2 роки тому +97

      I mean he is a lawyer lol he knows how it works

    • @moxiemaxie3543
      @moxiemaxie3543 2 роки тому +33

      Thats not discipline. You've been to school and work. Why would you speak casually in court where one word changes the way an answer can be manipulated? "Pledge vs donate"

    • @carlriggs5413
      @carlriggs5413 2 роки тому +41

      @@moxiemaxie3543 it would still take discipline to stay that stoic while dealing with these questions. Just because someone should do something doesn't mean it isn't impressive when they do it well imo.

    • @moxiemaxie3543
      @moxiemaxie3543 2 роки тому +7

      @@carlriggs5413 you ignoring the simple fact about average behavior. The average person doesn't need discipline to wait 1sec for instructions especially since they are trained/rehearse etc. Even amber looks over to her team for cues. Like an musician waiting for the conductor. Dont over exaggerate. Are people so unhinged that these very simple things are acquired by great talent and discipline? No, your standards are too low. Its normal

    • @suzannerush3644
      @suzannerush3644 2 роки тому +6

      Ben chew brilliant

  • @JuanitoRainman
    @JuanitoRainman 2 роки тому +4863

    Let’s remember kids, we don’t dislike Amber Heard because she’s a woman, we dislike her because she’s a liar!

    • @cindyrussell1581
      @cindyrussell1581 2 роки тому +61

      Frist of all children don't need to know about this stuff.

    • @momatotsosrorudodi
      @momatotsosrorudodi 2 роки тому

      And a violent psychopath.

    • @cancelhandles
      @cancelhandles 2 роки тому +255

      @@cindyrussell1581 Yes they do.

    • @BertMagurt
      @BertMagurt 2 роки тому +143

      @@cindyrussell1581 back to spelling class.

    • @ecanus-3605
      @ecanus-3605 2 роки тому +25

      @Michael didn't you know "adults" don't need know how to spell properly.....jk.

  • @MrGhosta5
    @MrGhosta5 2 роки тому +974

    Elaine did a great job of demonstrating the definition of insanity.

    • @fin911
      @fin911 2 роки тому

      Just trying to cast doubt in the jury that Johnny depp is hiding things by his lawyer not answering questions that break privilege

    • @tarniasimpson7599
      @tarniasimpson7599 2 роки тому +11

      🤣😂🤣😂😂

    • @rockyrock95g90
      @rockyrock95g90 2 роки тому +25

      LMAO SO TRUE!! She is now canonically insane 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @wig84
      @wig84 2 роки тому +24

      literally!! she asked every question she was denied at least 2 to 3 times

    • @astalavista7251
      @astalavista7251 2 роки тому +11

      She practiced by watching the bee movie. "Maybe this time ...or this time"

  • @AnnoyingTiger888
    @AnnoyingTiger888 2 роки тому +338

    Dude, I don't know where Johnny found his team but goddamn, they are top tier bro. And that witness is so fucking adorable, every time he accepted the objection, it made me so happy ❤

    • @Thi-Nguyen
      @Thi-Nguyen 2 роки тому

      The statement of acceptance is merely for the benefit of the jury to ensure that they understand why he is not answering much like a sustained while in court.

    • @jassiem84
      @jassiem84 2 роки тому +27

      When the world needed them most an elite team was assembled to combat the fire nations attack and deliver justice.

    • @starrshine369thequantumshaman
      @starrshine369thequantumshaman 2 роки тому

      Right? Damn! Because he’s Johnny Depp

    • @starrshine369thequantumshaman
      @starrshine369thequantumshaman 2 роки тому +1

      Best lawyers compilation ever seen!

    • @starrshine369thequantumshaman
      @starrshine369thequantumshaman 2 роки тому

      Camille is a damn hammer! Wow

  • @goaway3361
    @goaway3361 2 роки тому +359

    Elaine has some of the WORST courtroom courtesy I’ve ever seen and that says a lot. She argues with the judge and her decisions on overrule/sustain and will actively throw temper tantrum’s when the decision is not in her clients favor. I genuinely have no idea how Amber feels even an ounce of assurance with a lawyer like her 😬

    • @jsas2047
      @jsas2047 2 роки тому +40

      Not even just arguing, she interrupted the judge (and Johnny's team) several times..

    • @larrythompson2588
      @larrythompson2588 2 роки тому +28

      I really can't stand the sound of her voice

    • @cori7209
      @cori7209 2 роки тому +32

      I loved when Camille was like "unintelligible"! it was so funny!

    • @chantalmartel4721
      @chantalmartel4721 2 роки тому +6

      I hope she will have a notice from the lawyer association..her license should be removed..

    • @joanholland3438
      @joanholland3438 2 роки тому

      She’s hogwash!

  • @nickg1863
    @nickg1863 2 роки тому +1658

    This whole trial is actual gold and I wouldnt doubt that its brought a renewed interest into court proceeding in younger people.

    • @BabvBlues
      @BabvBlues 2 роки тому +23

      Trueee

    • @lunamoon8827
      @lunamoon8827 2 роки тому +3

      @@wej0w 🥺

    • @revit4909
      @revit4909 2 роки тому +57

      99% of people yeah but at least 1% might like it as a career

    • @K-ro7lm
      @K-ro7lm 2 роки тому +26

      I think we're all invested because we knew this would happen with the me too movement. If johnny loses his case I think it will be pretty bad for the movement in the eyes of allot of people and get brought up allot when it's mentioned.

    • @bertrambeenfeldt4676
      @bertrambeenfeldt4676 2 роки тому +4

      The Interest was never there before

  • @heezypeasy8611
    @heezypeasy8611 2 роки тому +1596

    Her lawyers are the ones who claimed Johnny was wasting the courts time by giving longer answers than they wanted....Yet she is literally asking the same questions and asking questions she knows he's not gonna answer due to breaching atty client privilege....who is wasting the courts time again?! 🤔

    • @moonlitskylight5740
      @moonlitskylight5740 2 роки тому +77

      The joys of grasping at straws, haha.

    • @kylejohnson6070
      @kylejohnson6070 2 роки тому +8

      End of case. Game over. That’s all this case is about. Negative publicity, that took away from a persons lifestyle. End all, be all. Both are guilty. They both negatively hurt each other. That’s it.The Judge only cares about that. The Jury only cares about that. They don’t care about the smashing of cabinets, or cutting off a persons finger. They are brought in to establish if this cases hurt either career. It did, as proof from the industry. The prior history of abuse doesn’t matter. It’s not what the Jury is asked to decide. They both negatively hampered the others career. It’s done.

    • @isabel5608
      @isabel5608 2 роки тому +38

      Who would want to hire Amber's lawyer after this?

    • @Jfieldsend94
      @Jfieldsend94 2 роки тому +29

      They have nothing left at this point so what they are doing here is trying to use that attorney client privilege as some sort of admission of guilt, similar to how some people will say using your right to remain silent is the same thing. Basically, despite it being perfectly normal to do so, they are trying to act like the Depp team is stopping him from telling them this supposed key info. It could be that if they waved the privilege, he’d not say anything that reflects badly on Johnny anyway, but Ambers team is underhandedly trying to make them look like their hiding something.

    • @dalemcd1408
      @dalemcd1408 2 роки тому +7

      She’s getting paid by the hour. Keep it going😂

  • @StewStrengthCo
    @StewStrengthCo 2 роки тому +400

    So 200 questions and we learned this guy is in fact a lawyer that he had a twitter

    • @ahooveryourmom
      @ahooveryourmom 2 роки тому +58

      And he got banned for life. 🙃

    • @cebee2106
      @cebee2106 2 роки тому +111

      Don't forget that he has an attorney-client relationship with Johnny. I think that came up once or twice, not sure

    • @edwinayuso2358
      @edwinayuso2358 2 роки тому +6

      @@ahooveryourmom That's why I'm glad that Elon bought it due to the fact that he'll let people exercise the first amendment.

    • @LolRofl97xD
      @LolRofl97xD 2 роки тому +14

      @@cebee2106 really? do you have a timestamp for that? or 2? or 2000?

    • @iamsilvereyes3586
      @iamsilvereyes3586 2 роки тому +2

      🤣🤣🤣🤣 OBJECTION HEARSAY 🤣🤣🤣🤣 lol jk

  • @rockysama2391
    @rockysama2391 2 роки тому +123

    Here are some quick facts about Amber that we know that are proven:
    1) He wasn't the only alcoholic and drug abuser. She drank 2 bottles of wine a day, took drugs as well by her own admission.
    2) Caught lying about using the makeup that didn't exist back then to "cover her bruises" frequently, which was refuted by the makeup company in court.
    3) Past domestic violence arrest against her ex, literally charged and arrested. Plus admitted to domestic violence against Johnny. Plus suspicion of domestic violence against her own sister (her sister was discussing it with her friends by the poolside in a video clip), and assaulted her ex-best friend in public. In contrast Johnny has no history of being violent towards women, every single one of his ex gfs and spouses all speak highly of him, and has said he's never laid hands on them.
    4) Audio recording of her admitting to cutting his finger in Australia (not allowed in this trial due to technicalities), proving again that her testimony was a lie. (one of the voices on the tape is now deceased and can't testify)
    5) Her psychologist lied about Amber having no domestic violence history and was called out by Johnny's attorney.
    6) Has NO witnesses or evidence (all conveniently random strangers that she doesn't know or deceased people like the bodyguard)
    7) Her longtime assistant testified under oath that she did not once see or hear any physical abuse from Depp or ever saw any injuries on Heard in all the years. She also testified under oath that Heard spit ON her face when she asked for a raise
    8) She visits Dr Kipper's office the day after an alleged incident where she was severely beaten, the doctor's medical report states her in perfect health, with no injuries of any kind on her, also state her skin was in perfect condition. Her explanation was "this was a partial report and I didn't have time to get into the details with the doctor about the injuries". (Day 16 of trial cross examination)
    9) Allegedly got her nose broken, hit multiple times, her scalp and hair ripped off, penetrated by a bottle, dragged over broken glass and got her arms and legs "pretty cut up", then somehow felt safe enough to take sleeping pills with her "attacker" in the same house, woke up the next day and made him coffee, then went to James Corden's show miraculously healed. No marks, no scars, no pictures, no medical report . Hair stylist saw no signs of abuse, the hair stylist would've been inches away from her face looking at all the details while working on her appearance, and she saw 0 injuries. Multiple witnesses (including 3 cops) saw no signs of abuse.
    10) Allegedly got raped and assaulted multiple times on her honeymoon, then wrote Johnny a love letter saying "it was the most amazing and beautiful honeymoon any girl could've ever dreamed of". (evidence presented in Day 18 of trial)
    11) Claimed she wanted to leave Johnny, but in all the audio clips she was the one begging him to stay. Claimed she always tried to de-escalate, but in audio clips she was always the aggressor preventing him from leaving and taunting him .
    12) In all her "crying", there's never a single tear coming out of her eyes, even when reciting the most "traumatic experience".
    13) Allegedly feared for her life but bought him a large knife.
    14) Testified under oath that she was beaten by Johnny with huge chunky rings on all his fingers, said she was "hit so many times in the face over and over again she lost count". The photos taken the next day shows her face completely spotless without any injuries, when cross examined, she answers "there do not appear to be any injuries on my face in that photo".
    15) Caught lying under oath again saying she "didn't receive money" from Johnny when she got $7 million, and lying about "never assaulted" Johnny when she admits to it on tape.
    16) Proven once again as a liar when she made public statement of donating 7 million dollars for children's hospital but in reality donated exactly 0 dollars before she was called out, also caught lying under oath about donating the money. Her sworn statement was "I donated the entire settlement of $7 million to charity", when cross examined, she states "I did not lie, I pledged the $7 million, "pledged" and "donated" are synonymous, they mean the same thing." (Day 16 of trial cross examination)
    17) Blackmailing Depp with her attorney, trying to make a deal for 3 of the adjoining penthouses where they both lived, 50k monthly expenses, 500k in attorney fees and the SUV Depp let her drive in exchange for not filing the protection order.
    18) Her publishing of the op-ed "domestic violence" piece is timed perfectly with the release of Aquaman film, it didn't get published when they divorced, or before, or right after, but instead it was published right when Aquaman was being released and when the "Me Too" movement was grabbing the most headlines.
    19) Amber Heard's team desperately tried to stop the trial from being publicly broadcasted while Depp's team made sure it was made public
    20) Long time friend and co worker of Amber Heard telling about her hardcore cocaine and drug habit dating all the way back to 2008 when they were close associates, (youtube show called "Steven and Jason" and in the newest episode titled "We need to talk about AH").
    21) Amber testified about having injuries such as “gross colored puss coming out of her temple” and “suffering a broken nose”, but when cross examined she changes the lines to “gross colored puss UNDER HER SCALP” and “FELT like a broken nose”, because she knew the evidence is about to show ZERO injuries visible on her. (How does she see gross colored puss under her scalp? With an X-ray machine??)
    22) Allegedly got beaten up for FIVE YEARS and not a SINGLE injury shown on her face, no doctor visits, no dentists, no surgeons, no photos, despite countless appearances in public events and countless photos taken given her celebrity status, many of those public appearances were the night after "the beating", keep in mind the beating were all allegedly done by Depp with "huge chunky" rings on all his fingers, yet after five years of beating, she didn't need to visit the doctors once or show on sign of injury on her face, sounds like her facial bone density and durability of her skin can match that of armor platings.
    23) Alleges Johnny slashed the soles of her feet, but was seen the next day walking completely normal, again no doctor visits or treatments of any kind even though she has a personal doctor on retainer.
    24) Constantly changing details of her stories and allegations, she's already given 4 different versions of the poop incident, she has said "1: told security guard that she pooped and it was a practical joke gone wrong. 2: Johnny did it to frame her. 3: said it never happened and Johnny was gaslighting her. 4: said the tiny puppies did it."
    25) Her lying under oath is not even worth mentioning anymore, there is too many to list, just to list a few in this trial alone. Lying about not receiving any money from Johnny, when in fact she received $7 million. Lying about having donated the money, when in fact she has donated $0 so far. Lying about never assaulted Johnny, when in fact she was recorded admitting to it multiple times. Lying about never assaulted anyone before, when in fact she's assaulted at least 4 that we have evidence of. Lying about her injuries, when a medical record showed absolutely no injuries.
    26) She put someone through hell for years, publicly shamed and destroyed his career and life, just so she can be seen as a noble victim and use the attention and sympathy to advance her career and profile. She claims she's never wanted to be seen as a victim and wanted to move on, but appears in countless TV shows and articles talking about her "abuse" and "donation" non stop, literally appeared on every show she could to talk about her being a victim and being noble on the donation that never happened.
    27) Amber's own friend, Tillet Wright, a long time close friend with Amber Heard, testified under oath that he's never seen or heard Amber being abused by Johnny Depp. (Day 20 of trial)

    • @hippielove3100
      @hippielove3100 2 роки тому +6

      @ Rocky Sama
      Thank you , you never missed
      anything. I'd like to add all her
      men going in & out of " their
      apt , which she could never afford .

    • @kshaddoz4590
      @kshaddoz4590 2 роки тому +1

      this is psych up stuff. That´s straight to arkham

    • @perkidanman
      @perkidanman 2 роки тому +13

      She also refused to do a prenup or postnuptial, got mad when she wasn’t in his will, and withheld his detox medication (which could be fatal).

    • @lisaferro5560
      @lisaferro5560 10 місяців тому +3

      Let's clear something up on (2.) AH claimed she used a bruise kit. A 'bruise kit' in 'theatrical' is actually a kit to MAKE bruises. They are used in the movies to make the actress or actor look beat up or injured. AH slipped up, big time. Johnny being an actor should have caught that slip-up. Maybe it's because Ben and Camille didn't have enough evidence to pressure it, but that would have shut everything down if they could have.

    • @lisaferro5560
      @lisaferro5560 10 місяців тому +2

      @@perkidanman when I heard she withheld his detox medication, that's just evil. All she wanted to do was hurt Johnny. He was a weak man to her, and she purposely tried to inflict pain on him in any way she could.

  • @dystoniaify
    @dystoniaify 2 роки тому +144

    According to the lawtube lawyer in audience, the jury was sleeping through this until they all heard AH is being investigated for perjury multiple times, lol

  • @charwest9449
    @charwest9449 2 роки тому +641

    She never gets mad because she knows he won't answer her questions BUT JUST HER ASKING THEM ALLOWS HER TO PLANT DOUBT INTO THE JURY AND MAKE OUTRAGEOUS STATEMENTS. That's all she can do with the lack of evidence Amber has given her.

    • @cryingtomatohead8626
      @cryingtomatohead8626 2 роки тому +63

      Several attorneys reacting to this trial are saying the same things. The answer is irrelevant as long as the seed of doubt is there due the question being brought up

    • @davelanger
      @davelanger 2 роки тому +101

      As a juror I would find it shady a lawyer is trying to get another lawyer to break attorney client privilege.

    • @sashatoledo1874
      @sashatoledo1874 2 роки тому +66

      It’s true but according to the court reports who were next to the jury they were extremely annoyed with this and looked like they felt it was a waste of time. Not a good look for Amber or Elaine.

    • @Synthia17
      @Synthia17 2 роки тому +12

      Exactly, that's why they didn't cut out the objections even in those long streaks. Slimy as hell.

    • @alliebonesVODs
      @alliebonesVODs 2 роки тому +36

      By about the 7th or 8th time it happened, I basically checked out of paying any attention to the questions she was even asking. If I were on the jury I'd be pissed so much time was being wasted.

  • @Breakdowns04
    @Breakdowns04 2 роки тому +725

    This is disgraceful. Some of these questions were so obviously made in hopes that the other lawyer would not instruct the witness not to answer and so betray attorney client privilege. Brutal.

    • @Idontagree1
      @Idontagree1 2 роки тому +98

      That’s the art of lawyering. Unfortunately for Elaine, the witness is an owner of a law firm himself for the past 16 years and Ben chew is elite

    • @Breakdowns04
      @Breakdowns04 2 роки тому +20

      @@Idontagree1 Yes! And in some places, she’s using the exact same language. Sometimes she will say, “And it was Mr. Depp‘s decision” and you know what’s coming next.

    • @sordbrute2753
      @sordbrute2753 2 роки тому +16

      Honestly what would be legendary is if some senario at the end of all this.... Turd's legal team turns around and bites her legally for dealing em false evidence. Because the public image of these lawyers are down the shitter at this point.

    • @Breakdowns04
      @Breakdowns04 2 роки тому +17

      @@sordbrute2753 And JD’s team represents them.

    • @stijnvdv2
      @stijnvdv2 2 роки тому

      h, as lawyers themselves they obviously knew. But I guess AH is using any dirty trick she can, even intimidating a witness mafia style, on which she now brought the FBI investigation into this... She is creating one problem after the other, coz Australia is investigating her illegal dog transfer during lockdowns, to the extend she threatened an employee her job if she was not gonna take the fall... in the UK she's in for perjury; lying under oath, now this FBI thing.... she and Esra Miller can shake hands on how horrible they both are.

  • @michaelhull7442
    @michaelhull7442 2 роки тому +861

    Bro I can’t take this trial anymore. Nothing makes sense and if they believe that crazy lady over Johnny I’m gonna lose my shit 💀

    • @dougfoster445
      @dougfoster445 2 роки тому +18

      i think they are both broken

    • @mskyn150
      @mskyn150 2 роки тому +81

      If she wins, I'm seriously gonna puke.

    • @SixSixWurmToken
      @SixSixWurmToken 2 роки тому

      That crazy woman HAS to go to jail or spend a few years in a mental institution or I'm gonna lose the rest of my faith in humanity

    • @sweetlulu6194
      @sweetlulu6194 2 роки тому +61

      @@mskyn150 Still, remember Casey Anthony was found not guilty. Jurors are unpredictable. I believe there are 10 men and two women in the jury. Women tend to be tougher on women. If one guy falls for her damsel in distress show ... She's set. I hope not!

    • @enthiegavoir5955
      @enthiegavoir5955 2 роки тому +40

      If she wins the public will forever despise her because they won't feel that sense of catharsis, and they're always going to want to see her get punished.

  • @seanpotts8783
    @seanpotts8783 2 роки тому +155

    Her attorney's are trying to prey on jurors not understanding what the attorney/client privelege means. "He never answered our questions, he has something to hide!!!" If he had answered any of those questions he could have been brought before a review board and lost his license to practice law, not to mention he would NEVER get another client!!

    • @KerryERRN
      @KerryERRN 2 роки тому +16

      Yeah because the people that they hire to study juries have come back & said that 8 of the 9 jurors are on Johnny’s side, they took notes during JD’s testimony & during his witnesses, but when AH began to testify they put there notebooks down & basically checked out.

    • @user-lk1qx7gb5o
      @user-lk1qx7gb5o 2 роки тому +2

      If the jurors are that stupid then Johnny will certainly lose.

    • @elegantblue19
      @elegantblue19 2 роки тому +9

      Jurors aint that stupid, plus depps lawyers made reasons as to why he shouldnt answer due to breaking confidentiality disclosing communications

    • @felipediashd_4616
      @felipediashd_4616 9 місяців тому

      Obviously has something to hide kkkkkkk he is a Lawyer

    • @vaxan5126
      @vaxan5126 7 місяців тому

      Pretty much everyone knows attorney client privilege

  • @angiejo6653
    @angiejo6653 2 роки тому +124

    This guy nailed his testimony!!"That would include every person on earth" That comment just became Legend!!

    • @meh457
      @meh457 2 роки тому +2

      Do you have a timestamp?

    • @Sasorislovery
      @Sasorislovery 2 роки тому +2

      @@meh457 51 minutes in

  • @zachreitan3859
    @zachreitan3859 2 роки тому +660

    When the lawyer has his own lawyer you know shit has gotten real

    • @theclimbto1
      @theclimbto1 2 роки тому +88

      Law-ception.

    • @charg1nmalaz0r51
      @charg1nmalaz0r51 2 роки тому +22

      this made me chuckle quite a bit lol. Surely if the lawyer needs a lawyer the other lawyer is better than him so JD should dump this guy with the glasses and grab him that better one off camera lol

    • @Lee-jc1gb
      @Lee-jc1gb 2 роки тому +88

      Even when you are a lawyer you generally get your own one to represent you as if you are the one being questioned it hard to think about your answers and think about all the legal things at the same time

    • @jgw9990
      @jgw9990 2 роки тому +111

      Nah lawyers should never represent themselves. It's best to have objective support.

    • @נעמינאור-ו3פ
      @נעמינאור-ו3פ 2 роки тому +124

      There is proverb which says:
      "A man who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client"

  • @wteverisgud
    @wteverisgud 2 роки тому +1094

    Just imagine if he loses after all of this. I already have no faith in the justice system but this will bring a lot of people to my side if they weren't already. If an audio tape of her admitting to assaulting him and mocking him that nobody would believe him if he said he was abused isn't enough then i don't know what is. They have convicted people with far less evidence than that.

    • @Buy_My_Mixtape
      @Buy_My_Mixtape 2 роки тому +36

      He'll lose for sure. Hollywood and the media will make sure of it.

    • @Debs766
      @Debs766 2 роки тому +8

      I think they'll both lose

    • @justhaku9240
      @justhaku9240 2 роки тому +26

      Yeah like aisax said it's a defamation case so it's entirely possible he loses, although it's looking good

    • @vahidoph
      @vahidoph 2 роки тому +11

      the thing is defamation cases are extremely hard to win. she being a horrible person or abusive has very small effect on that decision, sadly . there are law YT channels that explain that better.

    • @kosmos-1608
      @kosmos-1608 2 роки тому +4

      Yeah I agree I don’t believe he will win just because the justices system is fucked has been for a while it will be sad when the time comes.

  • @spoopy_vaporeon1815
    @spoopy_vaporeon1815 2 роки тому +106

    That fucking cheeky look he gives when he's talking about how he's banned for life from Twitter

  • @Excalibur-Sonic
    @Excalibur-Sonic 2 роки тому +22

    I love 'I accept the instruction!' that was him basically saying I agree with that assessment and will not answer. Love that response.

  • @katheryn8272
    @katheryn8272 2 роки тому +59

    She lost the jury’s attention after the first 10 questions.

  • @emilywhi9361
    @emilywhi9361 2 роки тому +124

    Mr. Depp has already," won ". He's been given the chance to tell his side. I think that's all he ever wanted. Forget the money. It was his NAME that he cared about. I was a fan of his proformace throughout the industry before.. I didn't know his story on this level though. While I've watched , listened, and learned about him, personally I only respect him more.
    Look some of the most amazing people have drug problems. Doesn't mean they are bad people . After all of this my heart truly goes out. It's not about the drugs it's about Amber's lies. He's up front and center about his dirt, ( the whole darn jar lol). He didn't owe anyone that insight into his demons. He didn't owe anyone that. He owed himself and he payed up on it. Praying for you MR. DEPP.
    Total respect . You did the damn thing!!!! Xxx

    • @KerryERRN
      @KerryERRN 2 роки тому +1

      I agree it’s never been about the money for Johnny it was to be able to clear his name of being a “wife beater” and instead that he was a man that was a victim of Domestic Violence and that Amber Heard was his abuser!

    • @kittysophiesmumma5400
      @kittysophiesmumma5400 2 роки тому +3

      mm.....I see what you're saying ...but... imagine if JD doesn't win & he will then be potentially forced to pay his abuser! Millions and millions of dollars!
      That would be really disgusting.

    • @emilywhi9361
      @emilywhi9361 2 роки тому +1

      @@kittysophiesmumma5400 it would be beyond disgusting. Unfathomable really. I personally can not, not see this going in Mr. Depps favor. The trial was addressing how AH caused damage to Depp regarding negative and false statements, pertaining to his work life.
      I should sue her for mind fucking the world throughout this. Those poor jury members. She should have to pay for whatever trauma they've endured throughout this whole thing.

  • @edwardjones2202
    @edwardjones2202 2 роки тому +138

    Asmongold, this lawyer is the one that sat down next to Amber Heard in the UK trial and without saying a word just slapped a newspaper down next to her with an article he'd engineered demolishing her bullshit!
    Fucking love this guy!

    • @pam5986
      @pam5986 2 роки тому +5

      Wow thanks interesting!

    • @suzanne1392
      @suzanne1392 Рік тому +5

      And he had to toss it to her because of covid spacing!

  • @HandoftheLord94
    @HandoftheLord94 2 роки тому +183

    She totally expects him to break the law, now it makes sense. She is not only stupid, she's persistent.

    • @Maninawig
      @Maninawig 2 роки тому +10

      I wonder if the BAR association will find this case interesting... I mean, that is common knowledge, and they were objected so much it must have broken a record.

    • @donadeavera9608
      @donadeavera9608 2 роки тому +2

      The stupid usually are

    • @No-dy3zk
      @No-dy3zk 2 роки тому

      To be far they are working with a liar who have given them weak evidence to work with.

  • @karrietobin9326
    @karrietobin9326 2 роки тому +91

    Johnny Depp's entire legal team needs to get an award for being certified badasses. THEY know how to work in his best interest. I'm sure they cost a pretty penny....but I enjoy listening to them SOOOO MUCH!!!

    • @DrOinkman
      @DrOinkman 2 роки тому +5

      well they basically got a free win, all they need to do is not fuck up, to be fair. AH basically did their job for them.

    • @chrisc2479
      @chrisc2479 2 роки тому +4

      I believe Mr. Chew is on $850/hr and Ms. Vasquez on $450/hr.

  • @GV-su9ov
    @GV-su9ov 2 роки тому +34

    I made a scorecard of the number of times JD's lawyer instructed this witness not to answer due to lawyer/ client privilege, guess how many? About 90 times and one hearsay. It's the same line of questioning over and over again.

  • @CATAZTR0PHE
    @CATAZTR0PHE 2 роки тому +162

    After these trials, I understand why good lawyers earn so much. They save his reputation and career - and it's worth every million he spent on it.

    • @kellynolen498
      @kellynolen498 2 роки тому

      ohh yeah there a godsend and they cant be compelled to speak against you but I guess you only see there full form when you spend hundreds of thousands

  • @zenamen5221
    @zenamen5221 2 роки тому +87

    Mr Waldman branded her accusations “fake”, a “sexual violence hoax” and an “ambush” - and I"m pretty sure he was banned for this.

  • @isometimespaintstuff
    @isometimespaintstuff 2 роки тому +199

    I'm unemployed and sad but watching this trial has really helped me find joy.

    • @vuyolwethucocoa2136
      @vuyolwethucocoa2136 2 роки тому +13

      Bringing you light & wishes of abundance in your present chapter 🤗

    • @isometimespaintstuff
      @isometimespaintstuff 2 роки тому +2

      @Tim Maes I wish it supported the family. :(

    • @1satisfiedmind
      @1satisfiedmind 2 роки тому +1

      What state, and city are you in?

    • @isometimespaintstuff
      @isometimespaintstuff 2 роки тому +1

      @@1satisfiedmind for what reason lol

    • @isometimespaintstuff
      @isometimespaintstuff 2 роки тому +2

      @@affirmationproof8504 Thank you buddy. Sending you love as well. The world doesn't have enough of it.

  • @Lena-1977
    @Lena-1977 2 роки тому +145

    "I accept the instruction!". That's gold!
    How many ways can Elaine ask a question? Flipping the words around doesn't change the ⁉️
    Johnny has gotten himself a bunch of damn good attorneys, where as Amber's team seems to be making her look way guilty..
    It's not because of this trial and some bad tweets that caused Amber to lose career opportunities... She's a bad actress.

  • @DvanderPluijm
    @DvanderPluijm 2 роки тому +33

    That lawyer is a BOSS, man! He's so on top of everything, he's doing an amazing job!

  • @4kageden
    @4kageden 2 роки тому +185

    Bro. I was laughing throughout this testimony. Ben Chew sounds like he's watching the deposition from a nearby building with a radiotelephone.

    • @abramrexjoaquin7513
      @abramrexjoaquin7513 2 роки тому +12

      Ben Chew Chewing on those questions of AH's lawyers like tic-tac of objections

    • @wilsonmcmahonatgmail
      @wilsonmcmahonatgmail 2 роки тому +3

      Ben Chew was the second vape guy, right? Asmon was right. He's a G!

    • @brendathomas1435
      @brendathomas1435 2 роки тому +1

      Which one is Mr CHEW!

    • @greasysheets2829
      @greasysheets2829 2 роки тому +1

      I wish she would finish n go sit down. she should have figured out by now she's not getting anywhere cuz JD attorneys are the boss 😂😂😂 I wish she would just accept my instruction😏

    • @thewarriors3048
      @thewarriors3048 2 роки тому +5

      @@wilsonmcmahonatgmail Ben Chew is the lawyer.

  • @thunderrain789
    @thunderrain789 2 роки тому +208

    I can't believe watching a guy essentially say "I can't answer that" over and over again is so entertaining.

    • @ramironahuelpenas2538
      @ramironahuelpenas2538 2 роки тому +2

      True

    • @williamkendrick6148
      @williamkendrick6148 2 роки тому +20

      Attorney-client communications privileges. Defense was just hoping and praying the jury would think they were hiding something. Depp's law team is too good and I'm thinking the jury isn't that stupid.

    • @thunderrain789
      @thunderrain789 2 роки тому +11

      @@williamkendrick6148 I agree. Even someone like me with zero legal knowledge knows there are certain things a person's lawyer can't disclose. The fact that this woman thought her BS would fool anyone is insane to me.

    • @charwest9449
      @charwest9449 2 роки тому +2

      @@thunderrain789 Like client like lawyer.

    • @cebee2106
      @cebee2106 2 роки тому +1

      Tbh, it gave me the same vibes as watching that bouncy dvd-symbol hit the corner of the screen XDXD
      Only the answer happened much more often and it was more about how many times he'd say it in a row

  • @claire_declared
    @claire_declared 2 роки тому +207

    Ben chew is the golden balls when it comes to lawyers.. he was born for this

    • @d.l.n.7133
      @d.l.n.7133 2 роки тому +11

      Yes , he looks like a sweetheart, but he gets the job done ! Not obnoxious like ROTTENborn

    • @claire_declared
      @claire_declared 2 роки тому +6

      @@d.l.n.7133 his expressions crack me up.. and nicking depps gummy bears 🤣

  • @emeraldblue5291
    @emeraldblue5291 2 роки тому +36

    I'm a paralegal. A client that didn't waive privilege and questioning his personal attorney is a fool's errand...as you can see. ANYTHING discussed at all between attorney & client is off bounds. This was a maasive waste of everyone's time. Elaine & Rottenborn are just burning Amber's money. They know damn well another attorney won't respond to these questions regarding communications or work product. Depos are extremely expensive & time intensive for all involved. All attorneys & support staff are paid their hourly rates + a court reporter is required and their hourly rate is also paid.

  • @paulabroadworth2504
    @paulabroadworth2504 2 роки тому +76

    Her team calling his lawyer was a waste of time. Her team only has 8hrs left for next week while his team has 18 hrs. Maybe they should have spent more time on real witnesses than these ones that won't make a difference. Her lawyers know he can't speak since they are lawyers themselves. This is the craziest dumbest thing they could do.

    • @KerryERRN
      @KerryERRN 2 роки тому +4

      Goes to show that they know AH lied to them & they’ve got nothing for their countersuit, and that Camille destroyed AH on cross they are killing time. I think they don’t believe the judge will stop them in the middle of where ever they are, like if they are in say closing arguments.

    • @john-tobeymaguirecena
      @john-tobeymaguirecena 2 роки тому +1

      They have no real witnesses

    • @kittysophiesmumma5400
      @kittysophiesmumma5400 2 роки тому

      Their whole case against Johhny is based on this guy's statements made in the press. AHs side have to ask him what they did or they'd have no case.
      But boy letting him say he believed it was staged by Amber & her "croonies" & that he went to a police station to say AH commited perjury *chefs kiss* moment for Depps side

  • @t5hammer871
    @t5hammer871 2 роки тому +348

    Thanks for doing this Asmongold. One of the only ways I can stomach the trial is watching with u

    • @sweetlulu6194
      @sweetlulu6194 2 роки тому +7

      💯

    • @claire_declared
      @claire_declared 2 роки тому +17

      I agree, it's the facial expressions that do it for me lol

    • @latishabuckner8231
      @latishabuckner8231 2 роки тому +13

      Agreed. I tried watching this live earlier and got so frustrated that Elaine kept asking questions that the witness couldn't answer without going against client/attorney privilege. Like did she not understand or was she trying to get one by. 😓😩

    • @brookehamilton3139
      @brookehamilton3139 2 роки тому +7

      Same

    • @liamalone2707
      @liamalone2707 2 роки тому +7

      I agree 🥳

  • @TheMsPhyl
    @TheMsPhyl 2 роки тому +246

    Johnny was lucky. Crazy Amber's next move "could " have been to claim self defense as she poked that dagger in him. I hope he and the rest of us learn a lesson. Take your time getting to know people and don't ignore warning signs. There are always warning signs.

    • @tundrawomansays5067
      @tundrawomansays5067 2 роки тому +21

      I agree. I have felt from the introduction of her “birthday gift” knife with the inscription she was planning to use this knife to kill JD and assert, “Self-defense.”
      She’s absolutely conscienceless and I have no doubt she was setting him up to murder him. Do*not* underestimate the rage within AH (and her ilk) and her lack of self control. He’s fortunate to be alive-and bringing this suit was based not only on principle but practicality: He knew she was capable of killing him-and getting away with it.

    • @marttiereeds3494
      @marttiereeds3494 2 роки тому +9

      Was thinking that too..then pretend to be the moaning widow for a few months before cashing in on the assets and life insurance.

    • @shonnamay8331
      @shonnamay8331 2 роки тому +14

      Study toxic narcissistic, personality disorders also
      The one fact that she continued to flirt with men and women in his presence indicates her constant need for ( supply)
      His jealousy ? Uh, how much was he too turn a blind eye towards?
      The crazy making cycle would had been unbearable,
      And he did the correct thing ,He Got Away,
      And that infuriated her !
      They can't handle rejection, and losing their control , the ample supply of financial abundance either

    • @tundrawomansays5067
      @tundrawomansays5067 2 роки тому +6

      @@shonnamay8331 Ms. May, I have a Masters, decades of experience (retired now, too many court testimonies/qualified witness to remember) and a “Mugger” who was AH all over again. This is what I grew up with as a “mother.” Believe me, my friend I truly do get it both personally and professionally.
      I am so sorry for the abuse you have suffered. Best wishes, take card.

    • @charwest9449
      @charwest9449 2 роки тому +3

      @@marttiereeds3494 like Yoko Ono

  • @mdbigboi191
    @mdbigboi191 2 роки тому +57

    You can tell Ben Chew is good, he's real good. He can even sit back and let his students handle things.bweve referred to Johnny as being Godrick the elden lord. Ben Chew is Amber's final boss. If all else failed, this man's going all out.

    • @doomguy19931
      @doomguy19931 Рік тому

      Ben Chew is the Radagan to Camille's Marika

  • @brettbutler4013
    @brettbutler4013 2 роки тому +11

    "do you want me to speculate?" is an amazing question. because speculating under oath is not good for an expert witness and she pushed him to guess a number

  • @shiniesglitters5424
    @shiniesglitters5424 2 роки тому +36

    i can't believe there is no penalty for a lawyers to constantly knowingly ask questions that cannot be answered

  • @greasysheets2829
    @greasysheets2829 2 роки тому +120

    See, this is why they should have never taken CourtTV off the air. this kind of gold could be watched 24/7.

    • @MaynardsSpaceship
      @MaynardsSpaceship 2 роки тому +10

      Dang, they did?? I used to fall asleep to that before the ASMR and white noise type stuff got big lol.

    • @bethclark8088
      @bethclark8088 2 роки тому +6

      @@MaynardsSpaceship i have been watching this case on courtTv lol

    • @MaynardsSpaceship
      @MaynardsSpaceship 2 роки тому +5

      @@bethclark8088 LOL! Oh, jeez... I was about to say they're nuts for getting rid of it!

    • @greasysheets2829
      @greasysheets2829 2 роки тому

      @@bethclark8088 where I live courtTv was changed to trueTv.😩

    • @carmelasowens9577
      @carmelasowens9577 2 роки тому +1

      I get it here in Oklahoma

  • @SurpriseMechanics
    @SurpriseMechanics 2 роки тому +223

    Amber's legal team are proof that literally anyone can become lawyers.

    • @kellynolen498
      @kellynolen498 2 роки тому +14

      hey there working with what they got and what they have is a phaychotic client that misrepresented the case to them and in the end they have to follow her instruction to a certain extent
      they're also fumbleing from the shear stress and frustration of representing AH in this fruitless trial
      they have to use every trick in the book to keep a 1 percent chance of success

    • @SurpriseMechanics
      @SurpriseMechanics 2 роки тому +2

      @@kellynolen498 True

    • @traceysaunders4711
      @traceysaunders4711 2 роки тому +2

      Even the best lawyer in the world needs to something to work with. And she probably lied to them too. She's ruined their careers, hope they sue!

    • @jaycroix5149
      @jaycroix5149 2 роки тому +3

      Ambers team is good except rottenborn. Elaine just cant play it right because her client, Amber, lacks strong evidence so they had to come up with lots of bullshit to try to convince the jury.

    • @user-lk1qx7gb5o
      @user-lk1qx7gb5o 2 роки тому +3

      Anyone can, intelligence has never been a requirement. As is with doctors. You can pass the bar yet be at the bottom of your class so to speak.

  • @jamesnevius2276
    @jamesnevius2276 2 роки тому +156

    Cant believe Elaine used this guys deposition as witness time. Just shows how flimsy their witnesses are and how desperate they are

    • @GuillaumeG-oz3hz
      @GuillaumeG-oz3hz 2 роки тому +2

      To be fair, it's law 101. Aside from open questions to your witnesses where you want them to talk, the rest of the time the question are a lot more important than the answers. Both team have done that a lot, it's how you do. You want to control the "discussion", tell your story and have the witness only answer "yes" or "correct".

    • @jamesnevius2276
      @jamesnevius2276 2 роки тому +2

      @@GuillaumeG-oz3hz sort of true. But thats only when you don't actually have witnesses with any substantial claims to make. Then tour questioning becomes more important than the answers. Just goes to my point that these witnesses depositions are so milquetoast its clearly all they have to throw on the stand. I get your point, she wanted to present her questions on what they believe wahldmen leaked etc. But it doesn't have any substantial sway over the jury. Its not a witness to any of the alleged incidents and was honestly probably demanded by heard and she believed it would help clear her in the public court. But people aren't offended that Johnny's lawyer called her names and leaked info after seeing all the evidence up to this point, so I just dont see what they thought theyre gaining from his depo.

    • @GuillaumeG-oz3hz
      @GuillaumeG-oz3hz 2 роки тому +6

      @@jamesnevius2276 She sued Johnny for 100M, for things that this guy said, allegedly representing Johnny. So they had to bring him in at some point, and try to convince the jury that he did work for Johnny and said those things in his name. He was not here to help them prove anything about the incidents.
      They can't get him to answer, obviously, but it was the minimum to present him to the jury and "suggest" what they're trying to sell about this accusation.
      I agree with you, don't think it's gonna work. Don't think there's a chance for her to win the 100M lawsuit, but they're getting paid to at least try.

    • @jamesnevius2276
      @jamesnevius2276 2 роки тому

      @@GuillaumeG-oz3hz yeah good point about that. Easy to forget theres actually a counter suit here because its obviously insane. I mean clamining the quotes can be attributed to johnny because his lawyer made them, and then turning around and claiming all of Amber's allegations were made by lawyers so she can't be held responsible is just wild.

    • @GuillaumeG-oz3hz
      @GuillaumeG-oz3hz 2 роки тому

      @@jamesnevius2276 Yes the counter suit was ridiculous, as was the amount she asked for it. I even thought it was a strategy to bring some witnesses or evidence that they could also use for the main suit, using that counter suit as an excuse, but apparently not. Just a petty counter attack.

  • @jaimebamburg6609
    @jaimebamburg6609 Рік тому +13

    Johnny's lawyers did ALL their homework before coming to court. That whole team is flipping amazing

  • @Bob-jm8kl
    @Bob-jm8kl 2 роки тому +14

    An attorney who doesn't know what attorney-client privilege is is an attorney I wouldn't hire.

  • @danielleschiazza6172
    @danielleschiazza6172 2 роки тому +60

    Omg they brought up the umbrella guy and Laura b?! That proves Amber was obsessing over social media and public opinion! It's unbelievable to me that she is ok with " a smear campaign" as she calls it, against Johnny but when it comes to her how dare anybody have their own opinions! There is no limit to her hypocrisy and narcissism.

  • @traces2807
    @traces2807 2 роки тому +172

    Is anyone else concerned about Johnny's mental health if he loses this trial? Hopefully he has enough support and love around him to see him through 💗

    • @mowilliams2113
      @mowilliams2113 2 роки тому +1

      I was thinking about that too!

    • @Pennick64
      @Pennick64 2 роки тому +24

      Johnny won already. Everyone is going to love him and Amber won’t get an acting career after this. This is the true win

    • @davelanger
      @davelanger 2 роки тому +15

      He hasn't lost in the eyes of the public. EVen if he loses most people will think he get screwed over and will support him even more.

    • @madjackgamingandfitness498
      @madjackgamingandfitness498 2 роки тому +3

      I’m thinking she spent most of the money considering her life style and is overreaching with a hundred million counter.

    • @lindaveswuh7777
      @lindaveswuh7777 2 роки тому +1

      Johnny 🏆 ✌️ 💪 🏆 ✌️ 💪

  • @rae2737
    @rae2737 2 роки тому +126

    This case will be studied by future law students.
    Subjects covered:
    How not to have witnesses on the stand that help the other sides case.
    How not to get frazzled to the point where you object yourself during questioning a witness.
    How not to look like a damn fool that earned their law degree from a cereal box.
    (The trial case study will be over 5,000 pages due to all the mistakes AH's lawyer did)

    • @feliciawashington1909
      @feliciawashington1909 2 роки тому +3

      😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

    • @kuzmavolkov
      @kuzmavolkov 2 роки тому +2

      To be fair I think you need to watch Legal Eagles video on point two since that was actually normal. It just sounds weird to us non lawyers.

    • @hentaidude666
      @hentaidude666 2 роки тому +5

      @@kuzmavolkov Legal Eagle turned out to be a sub par lawyer when actually looking him up, not a big fan of his anymore. My lawyer personality of choice is Attorney Tom

    • @PLAZMOHD
      @PLAZMOHD 2 роки тому +7

      Can we please start putting law degrees in cereal boxes

    • @kykloskatharevousa7147
      @kykloskatharevousa7147 2 роки тому

      @@hentaidude666 Could you elaborate on why? I'm curious, used to watch his shorts.
      What changed your views on him?

  • @alisondean1979
    @alisondean1979 2 роки тому +64

    This man is a legend standing up for male rights etc he's a warrior!

  • @kidz4dayz
    @kidz4dayz 2 роки тому +17

    What she *should be asking* is: “Do you think it would benefit me to go back to law school? Considering the mind blowing ignorance I’ve displayed regarding the rules of law during this trial, do you believe I’d be better suited to a job in which the only advice I provide to a client would be regarding ‘the soup of the day’?” Answer by Depp’s attorney: “Ma’am, after witnessing your work, social, and mental acuities - no matter what you decide to do for a profession, I don’t believe you should leave your house without wearing a helmet.”

    • @GuardianMinerva
      @GuardianMinerva 2 роки тому +1

      Don't for get with water wings and a life jacket 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂

  • @JawnSmith
    @JawnSmith 2 роки тому +81

    I didn't know who asmongold was before the quantum tv drama, and now he's my go to source for the Amber Turd case. Enjoying the commentary

    • @tonia4934
      @tonia4934 2 роки тому +1

      Agreed me too

    • @Tpower45
      @Tpower45 2 роки тому

      Try looking into Emily Baker's commentary as well. She's a lawyer and also gives great insight! She's also Fan of the "cursey words" lol both she and Asmongold are fun to watch!

    • @adenmcdooflez
      @adenmcdooflez 2 роки тому

      Same here. Primary reason I watch now lol

  • @Clu2298
    @Clu2298 2 роки тому +111

    Tbh I don’t even watch the actual trial livestreams anymore, I just watch Asmon’s reaction to them.

    • @sp00kyd4ddy6
      @sp00kyd4ddy6 2 роки тому +11

      Same I mainly do it because of the chat it's funny seeing them use Chad emotes after JD's lawyers do something funny

    • @anonymoushuman8443
      @anonymoushuman8443 2 роки тому +6

      Memes

    • @tundrawomansays5067
      @tundrawomansays5067 2 роки тому +6

      Great summaries, observations and saves me all the BS.
      Getting suspended from Twitter isn’t necessarily a bad thing at all but uh...it’s for LIFE?!
      Mon Dieu.

    • @Rose-ut7vs
      @Rose-ut7vs 2 роки тому +2

      His & Emily D Baker's.

    • @Thi-Nguyen
      @Thi-Nguyen 2 роки тому +1

      @@Rose-ut7vs I watch a random one here but much prefer Emily’s because she gives much more explanation as to what’s going on legally and what to expect or why things happened the way they did.

  • @truthseeker1234
    @truthseeker1234 2 роки тому +83

    We need more men like Adam Waldman and Johnny Depp standing up for TRUTH!!!!!

  • @aaronperez09
    @aaronperez09 2 роки тому +7

    Adam was very intelligent here, he would give pause after each question to allow Depps lawyer to give him instruction or not. Even though with his professional experience, I’m sure he already knew that the questions being asked were no good and should not be answered. Very smart play.

  • @MagicHamsta
    @MagicHamsta 2 роки тому +10

    Adam should've just wrote "I accept the instruction" on a piece of paper to raise up every time.

  • @ereoleon
    @ereoleon 2 роки тому +116

    This Trial is going to go down into history , probably should be used as study material for future layers.

    • @MrDoitfrombehind
      @MrDoitfrombehind 2 роки тому +1

      it probably will. ah lawyer, at least the woman, is actually really good in her job

    • @hobogoat2
      @hobogoat2 2 роки тому +8

      @@MrDoitfrombehind LOL WHAT??? She’s potentially the worst lawyer I’ve ever seen. It’s her job to mount a defense for AH, and yet she can’t construct a question that isn’t leading, doesn’t speculate, and doesn’t infringe on attorney client privilege? Bad bad BAD lawyer lol

    • @IndicatedGoodLife
      @IndicatedGoodLife 2 роки тому

      @@hobogoat2 Yea sure, you have no fucking idea what your talking about, lmao.

    • @madmantheepic7278
      @madmantheepic7278 2 роки тому

      @@hobogoat2 she cant produce shit if her client aint giving her anything to work with, are you brain dead? Look her up she was a respected lawyer before this shitshow, she wasnt the best in the world but in no way is she “Bad bad BAD” lmao get off that pedestal. We can laugh at Amber all we want she actually did something horrible, these people just made the mistake of siding with her, thats it regardless of how you feel about them.

    • @courve
      @courve 2 роки тому +1

      @@hobogoat2 pretty sure he meant the one that wants to date Jonny that is sitting next to him

  • @TheRobert3000
    @TheRobert3000 2 роки тому +178

    I hope depp wins and everyone sees how evil amber is how her and her friends set him up.

    • @mskyn150
      @mskyn150 2 роки тому +8

      We see it. Even if Depp loses.

    • @TheRobert3000
      @TheRobert3000 2 роки тому +3

      @@mskyn150 I do to but still he was kicked of potc and now they are giving it to Margaret robbie which is fucking stupid. She and her friends set him up

    • @brendathomas1435
      @brendathomas1435 2 роки тому

      Men get Abuse to! Make it NONE!! Shit MEN ! CRY TOO!!!

    • @OGdutch973
      @OGdutch973 2 роки тому

      Even if he doesn’t win we all know the truth. Remember this a defamation trial, not a DV trial

    • @TheRobert3000
      @TheRobert3000 2 роки тому +3

      @@OGdutch973 that is true I do hope he gets better and she leaves him alone now because she was treating him like shit her friends were lying etc. That op-ped she wrote got him blacklisted I hope he starts making movies again

  • @yanglin2209
    @yanglin2209 2 роки тому +53

    Ben certainly will be a great professor to train future lawyers👍 Many lawyers must have learned something or be reminded of something from JD's lawyers through this trial 👏👏👏

  • @Thi-Nguyen
    @Thi-Nguyen 2 роки тому +5

    She doesn’t get mad because her intent isn’t to get answers so much as it is to get these questions heard by the jury to plant seeds in their minds that something nefarious happened.

  • @JReezzy93
    @JReezzy93 2 роки тому +20

    Crazy thing is the judge clearly set a deadline. And for her lawyer to keep asking these questions knowing ad a lawyer they would be rejected seems like they are wasting time bc they have no other option lol

  • @ChaosRouge
    @ChaosRouge 2 роки тому +125

    This was a pure slaughter. This is what a real attorney who's very well versed looks like 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @_jow
      @_jow 2 роки тому +7

      capable and consistent in argumentation and logical arithmetic, a rare and valuable thing even amongst lawyers

  • @nicolebolick9663
    @nicolebolick9663 2 роки тому +179

    Just the fact that this "short" man can recall all the names from memory of all the people that said AH was fine shows what a great attorney he is!
    AH and all her cronies can barely remember what year they are in. Taking WAY too much time to answer questions, stalling, "umming" and long drawn out hissing answers all give AH and her friends and family time to recall bits of stories to all seem on the same page (you know, the stories they weaponize)
    This handsome man might be short but he can F#$K Amber ALL the way up!

    • @appu_destroyer3568
      @appu_destroyer3568 2 роки тому +10

      Well said

    • @officialsummyc
      @officialsummyc 2 роки тому +5

      @Steph 🤣💯

    • @johnmaurer3097
      @johnmaurer3097 2 роки тому +2

      @Steph as a trauma survivor myself (watching Marcia Clark get bullied relentlessly by the media during OJ), I feel bad for Elaine. She has nothing to work with bc Turd is insane, is well aware of it, and shes just maximizing those billable hours until the next case. She can’t look lazy or like she didn’t at least try.

  • @WATTYATHINK
    @WATTYATHINK 2 роки тому +92

    The psychologist (Dr. Currie) in court testimony provided one of the best clinical descriptions of Amber Heard and what it means to be Bat $hit Crazy and also inadvertently provided a new meaning for what "Amber Alert" means. Rumor has it that after AH's confused and disjointed testimony during the trial on May16/17, 2022, the American Law Society has issued its very first and precedence setting "Amber Alert" warning to all lawyers.

    • @LordHanmint
      @LordHanmint 2 роки тому +5

      this wins best comment jesus fucking christ

    • @d.l.n.7133
      @d.l.n.7133 2 роки тому +6

      @ Whattya think
      I just watched a panel of body language experts discussing how Amber was showing trails of some of the personality disorders that Dr. Curry said that Amber had .. l can’t spell it , but it was the hysterically disorder.. they pointed out going through and pausing Amber’s testimony. It was a long video, but very fascinating.

    • @susanhewitt5602
      @susanhewitt5602 2 роки тому +3

      @@d.l.n.7133 It was Histrionic Personality Disorder, and Borderline personality disorder. And she's definitely both of them at LEAST!

    • @Keesh73
      @Keesh73 2 роки тому +3

      🤭🤭🤭🤭

  • @susanstory3373
    @susanstory3373 2 роки тому +19

    Woah, I'm proud of JD for sending his team to protect one of his former employee. His former attorney, even though he was summon to court to be a witness for Amber.

  • @Hephaestus_God
    @Hephaestus_God 2 роки тому +9

    She's not getting mad because she knows. She just has a list of questions she made beforehand and is reading it. The questions might have been made before or after the knowledge of the confidentiality agreement being kept.
    So after each instruction she just reads the next one. She knows pretty much all of them won't get through but hopes some might.

  • @christianadler3532
    @christianadler3532 2 роки тому +52

    Ambers team:
    lets ask a lawyer questions about his work for a client, obviously knowing that he is not allowed to answer them.
    Also ambers team:
    Lets please respect the courts time

    • @suzanne1392
      @suzanne1392 Рік тому +1

      And Johnny had 5 hours left at the end & they didn't!

  • @TheRobert3000
    @TheRobert3000 2 роки тому +77

    She is asking the same question over and over he can't answer questions that require him to disclose attorney client privileges

    • @MrDoitfrombehind
      @MrDoitfrombehind 2 роки тому +4

      the thing is that she says this things, and everyone is hearing it. thats enough to build a wrong picture. you dont need the answers if u ask the same thing 5 times. it will settle down in your memory

    • @nawawii3750
      @nawawii3750 2 роки тому +3

      She making JD team seem to be hiding something major.. it appeal to conspiracy theorists very much

    • @TheRobert3000
      @TheRobert3000 2 роки тому +1

      @@nawawii3750 true but jd's team ain't hiding nothing

    • @CheZfrmdaWestWisc
      @CheZfrmdaWestWisc 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@MrDoitfrombehind but she has over played this tactic to such an extent it has only managed to etch in my mind the instruction I personally couldn't even hear her questions through the middle of that my brain omitted it and blurred together the instructions and instruction acceptance the witnesses brain did as well at one point.

  • @shannonslutzky4754
    @shannonslutzky4754 2 роки тому +56

    I’ve read some of the emails from this lawyer about his twitter….he spent quite a while writing to them trying to find out why he was suspended as well as why they wouldn’t let him start an acct for JD. They took days to respond, then never gave him a straight answer…then appealed and again disappeared….it was all really shady on twitters part since Adam was adamant he hadn’t done anything wrong

    • @TairaEldritch
      @TairaEldritch 2 роки тому +9

      I was banned on Twitter before and they did the same thing, when I appealed they just slapped the {"banned for life"} on it.. lol

    • @cebee2106
      @cebee2106 2 роки тому

      @@TairaEldritch I don't have Twitter, so I don't know, if that's possible, but couldn't you just make another Account with another e-mail?
      Or is this mainly about losing your data?

    • @NatoXemus
      @NatoXemus 2 роки тому +2

      @@cebee2106 yes you could but wouldn't be able to reveal any identification that you are who you say you are and if it's found to link back to you you get banned again for ban evasion

    • @cebee2106
      @cebee2106 2 роки тому +2

      @@NatoXemus Aah I see, that makes sense!
      Thank you^^

  • @luisacruz5303
    @luisacruz5303 2 роки тому +4

    The fact that JD´s attorney Ben Chew talked more that the witness is GORGEOUS, hahaha loving it

  • @darkbeholder715
    @darkbeholder715 2 роки тому +19

    She had to ask these questions even knowing they would all be objected to so they can be referenced/supported by other witnesses and in closing arguments. There was also some hope that this would suggest that JD's team was trying to hide something. Biggest problem with this was that video depos are boring and jury checked out other than when they heard he was trying to raise purjery charges against AH

  • @smylyface
    @smylyface 2 роки тому +32

    When Amber's lawyer clarified that the witness was hired after the divorce and asked if he had any knowledge of what went on during their marriage I was really hoping he would answer "no, do you?"

  • @colinsmith1495
    @colinsmith1495 2 роки тому +42

    I'm amazed the judge allowed a LAWYER WHO HAD WORKED FOR ONE PARTY to be put on the witness stand and questioned ABOUT HIS WORK AS A LAWYER REPRESENTING ONE OF THE PARTIES!!! Seriously, judge's instructions on this question should have been harsh and a hammer should have come down in that string of questions.
    That being said, 99% of those answers could be reasonably assumed by hypotheticals of what normal attorney-client relations look like. Like, how often do lawyers MAKE DECISIONS for their clients. Incredibly rare. How often do they speak about something related to the representation WITHOUT THEIR CLIENT'S PERMISSION TO DO SO? Incredibly rare and probably unethical when it happens.

    • @CATAZTR0PHE
      @CATAZTR0PHE 2 роки тому +2

      He is important for AH lawyers team, because witness who testified after him (Microsoft guy) was talking exactly about him. That audio logs leaked by him broke AH's public reputation and people on twitter started smear campaign against her etc.

    • @tundrawomansays5067
      @tundrawomansays5067 2 роки тому +4

      That’s what Appeal is for-this hearing and disposition are about over. Then the real game begins on Appeal-and that’s why she (this judge) was very liberal in allowing both sides plenty of leeway in their questioning.
      Nonetheless, AH unless constricted financially will Appeal if she doesn’t get the result-$$$$-she wants. She is the poster woman for the bit observed by the US comedian Bill Burr “an epidemic of gold digging whores...”
      She most certainly did nothing to disavow this observation.

    • @charwest9449
      @charwest9449 2 роки тому +3

      @@tundrawomansays5067 lol very true. Well, at least she gets to be the "poster woman" for something.

  • @elizabethlestrad5282
    @elizabethlestrad5282 2 роки тому +111

    Depp's legal team needs ask that the credentials of Amber Heard's lawyers be examined for legitimacy. With how poor of a show they are putting on, I question if they even passed the bar exam or just bought their law degrees online.

    • @wilsonmcmahonatgmail
      @wilsonmcmahonatgmail 2 роки тому +7

      Law and Lumber was not in that camp. They got a bad hand in this game.

    • @Mrs.J87
      @Mrs.J87 2 роки тому +1

      Hahaha yes!! I just said the same damn thing!!

    • @brendathomas1435
      @brendathomas1435 2 роки тому +2

      Call them the DOLLAR TREE STORE !!! LAWYER! THAT WHAT ALOT OF PEOPLE ARE DOING! MAKE ! IT GO VIRAL!!!!! AH LAWYER!!!

    • @hex_BooBerry
      @hex_BooBerry 2 роки тому

      YESSS

    • @nawawii3750
      @nawawii3750 2 роки тому +6

      They are doing very good job though. They plant doubt in jury's hearts in every turn..
      Remember, this trail is not determined by someone who study law and actually compare evidence.. it's decided by one random jury among the twelve..
      All it take is that 1 random person to get some bias..
      Actually, some of them will just rule against both parties for being a poor person hearing about rich people B.S for 6 weeks straight...

  • @undeadNova
    @undeadNova 2 роки тому +6

    I both regret and don't regret having made the "instruct not to answer" part into a drinking game

  • @gingeroo5765
    @gingeroo5765 2 роки тому +3

    27:46 I LOVVVE the SARCASM of Johnny’s 2 exasperated attorneys (straight-faced) jokingly clarify with each other the reasoning behind the objection being made.😂

  • @RamosLuis2550
    @RamosLuis2550 2 роки тому +14

    the guy gives the best responses "i follow that recommendation", " i accept that instruction"

  • @michelleprice5097
    @michelleprice5097 2 роки тому +45

    I watched this this morning. I purposely came here just to watch and listen to Asmon's reaction. Way more entertaining than the trial

    • @Jesssssss93
      @Jesssssss93 2 роки тому

      Me too since he first started covering this circus trial 🥹

  • @Maizan24
    @Maizan24 2 роки тому +32

    I feel like there are drinking games that can be created based on watching this trial. Every time amber fake cries take a drink. Every time they approach the judge take a drink.

    • @justincase1448
      @justincase1448 2 роки тому +6

      No one will be surviving that game lol

    • @Maizan24
      @Maizan24 2 роки тому +3

      Oh to make it more accurate you need to drink from a mega bottle of wine. And yeah that would be a very quick game.

    • @ahooveryourmom
      @ahooveryourmom 2 роки тому +2

      If we did we’d have a mega bunch of people with alcohol poisoning 😂

  • @susanhewitt5602
    @susanhewitt5602 2 роки тому +5

    "I accept the instruction!" Needs to be on a T-shirt!🤣

  • @ThallesNinja
    @ThallesNinja 2 роки тому +6

    The reason she keeps asking the same questions is not because she doesn't know, but is trying to seed doubt in the jury's mind. All she is doing is building up a story full of unanswered doubt for the jurors. She knows very well what she's doing.

    • @cebee2106
      @cebee2106 2 роки тому +1

      Only the jury just got annoyed at this pointXD

    • @shirleyrusaw5181
      @shirleyrusaw5181 2 місяці тому

      Sneaky Elaine as usual

  • @janieibanez4779
    @janieibanez4779 2 роки тому +45

    I knew what would be objected on each question he instructed not to answer. Either she doesn't know how to do her job and follow the law or she is trying to aggrevate this witness. She should be sanctioned by the court for asking the same questions over and over after they have been objected to.

    • @cebee2106
      @cebee2106 2 роки тому +3

      I heard other commenters point out that she intended to let the question create doubt in the jurors minds.
      From what I gathered, what is for sure is that it only annoyed the jurors (like, it was bad for AHs team).

  • @phoenixmistertwo8815
    @phoenixmistertwo8815 2 роки тому +19

    She's asking these questions on purpose so it can be revealed as to what he cannot speak of. She switched to that tactic after being blocked a few times .

  • @8bitsamurai6
    @8bitsamurai6 2 роки тому +34

    Dude cmon ben chew is a legend. Hes the one who flipped heard off.

  • @whitephoenix3545
    @whitephoenix3545 2 роки тому +6

    I don't know nothing about law, but I love how I could start to tell when the question was going to get objected. Like wtf

  • @cis4659
    @cis4659 2 роки тому +5

    the witness should've recorded "I accept the instruction" beforehand and just play it.

  • @hiryuimajin
    @hiryuimajin 2 роки тому +33

    I feel bad for Elaine and Rottenburn. Their names are now associated with a Turd. I'm sure they have done great previously but I think at this time where they work with so much less, I feel like they were made to fail.

    • @zanemadden2670
      @zanemadden2670 2 роки тому +2

      Fr she isn't a bad lawyer she would have been much better if amber said johnny hit 2 ond developed a detail account of what happened. The trial isnt if amber hurt johnny but if johnny ever hit amber once. Amber claiming Jd hit her alot destroyed her own case and credibility in the court

  • @angrybutters
    @angrybutters 2 роки тому +53

    The Lawyer should install his own sound board and just press a button , this is hilarious

  • @lunamoon8827
    @lunamoon8827 2 роки тому +41

    Do you think Amber's lawyers regret representing her. I mean the $$$ is good, but their careers are taking a blow.

    • @kellynolen498
      @kellynolen498 2 роки тому

      yeah must be hell I doubt she's any more honest with them seeing how delusional and self obsessed she is she probobly why there defence is so fucked up

    • @amberdaviswaddell
      @amberdaviswaddell 2 роки тому +2

      I hope they feel terrible for taking money that actually belongs (was “donated”) to sick kids from CHLA, but I doubt it!

    • @user-lk1qx7gb5o
      @user-lk1qx7gb5o 2 роки тому +1

      Elain was most likely on the way to retirement so I think the money was more important.

  • @schneeraizor7020
    @schneeraizor7020 2 роки тому +4

    this is actually 1 hour of slaughter.
    if i was AH lawyer, i would be hiding in my room for weeks just to recover.
    damn...

  • @ambuserabuser8463
    @ambuserabuser8463 2 роки тому +4

    This lawyer destroyed ambuser today. Her lawyers thought they were going to destroy Johnny but it back fired.

  • @leslieenoch
    @leslieenoch 2 роки тому +30

    I'm going to need that attorneys instruction quote as a ringtone!

  • @SimplySayNO
    @SimplySayNO 2 роки тому +87

    I wish I can afford attorneys this ruthless.I’d be suing everyone

    • @plee6230
      @plee6230 2 роки тому

      I hear u. I suffered yrs of Narrsisstic covert agenda to get money with his long time secret boyfriend. I was to smart but not really . Like amber, she never loved him. Set up . It's so fucked and I.. triggering

    • @fionadaniel4056
      @fionadaniel4056 2 роки тому +10

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 this is hilarious!!! Good lawyers are worth their weight in saffron..

    • @christksolidrock2231
      @christksolidrock2231 2 роки тому +3

      🤣🤣

    • @SimplySayNO
      @SimplySayNO 2 роки тому +3

      @@fionadaniel4056 😂

    • @user-lk1qx7gb5o
      @user-lk1qx7gb5o 2 роки тому +1

      They're not ruthless, they're doing their job.

  • @kimfleischman6148
    @kimfleischman6148 2 роки тому +34

    Why would you call this guy as a witness if he legally can't answer a majority of these questions?

    • @sp00kyd4ddy6
      @sp00kyd4ddy6 2 роки тому +2

      Wtf else would he be then if he was testifying?

    • @Trizica
      @Trizica 2 роки тому

      Perhaps he and/or JD’s slip up and miss an objection or not follow advice. She needed an opening to open a can of worms.

    • @lea88pu
      @lea88pu 2 роки тому +8

      To make it seem like Johnny is hiding something

    • @LaPlaztique
      @LaPlaztique 2 роки тому

      @@lea88pu But I think almost everyone knows that there is a such thing as attorney/client privilege. It’s the same for everyone!

    • @lea88pu
      @lea88pu 2 роки тому

      @@LaPlaztique I agree with you,but this is the only logical conclusion I could make. What else could it be?

  • @2Syndras1Cup
    @2Syndras1Cup 2 роки тому +6

    23:00 The lawyer versionof a Tekken 10 Hit Combo.
    Fucking glorious.

  • @nickname7152
    @nickname7152 2 роки тому +5

    Now I understand how AH team left with 8 hours court time while JD team have 18 lol

  • @t.r.6930
    @t.r.6930 2 роки тому +12

    She wastes time asking the same questions. She knows it would violate client / lawyer privilege and keeps repeating them.

  • @glennkamers
    @glennkamers 2 роки тому +15

    There's gonna be so many Elaine memes flying around after this trial 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Dayhawk101
    @Dayhawk101 2 роки тому +39

    Depp's Lawyer teams is top notch. Multi million dollar legal team. Holy crap.

    • @CATAZTR0PHE
      @CATAZTR0PHE 2 роки тому +5

      After this trial I understood why good lawyers earn so much 😅

    • @christineclark3527
      @christineclark3527 2 роки тому +4

      Johnnys lawyers are the real deal A+ class and knowledge great choice Johnny . Ambers lawyers are ground beef Johnnys filet mignon lol!

    • @user-lk1qx7gb5o
      @user-lk1qx7gb5o 2 роки тому +1

      Because they're doing their job?

  • @Excalibur-Sonic
    @Excalibur-Sonic Рік тому +2

    Around the 1year anniversary of the trial I went back and rewatched this video. Deciding to count the objections. While I try to get as close as possible, is a rough count (Times of the objections , in mostly counts of ten. Also some notes.)
    COUNT
    10 around 8-mins
    20 around 14-mins
    30 - yes or no around 18-mins
    40- around 22mins
    50 - around 27-28mins walden asking if it would be objectionable
    52/53 - walden didn't hear.
    60- around 31 mins
    63 - hersey
    70- around 35mins
    80 - around 39mins
    large gap as Rottenborn started asking questions: binder question - around 56mins for reference)
    90 - possible objection 1hr that was cut off.
    So roughly there was around 90 Objections.

  • @gothic_angel
    @gothic_angel 2 роки тому +3

    Adam Waldman was amazing, hats off to solicitor objecting. Elaine knows full well he is bound by client attorney privilege; same as she has for amber.