kinda yes but its more because kids under 13 are watching videos when there not support too. cause the parents can't be parents to the kids. why have kids if you can't parent them.
I mean...it's getting more and more difficult to parent these days. With this little rectangular internet machine in the palm of every kid's hands, they can secretly look at whatever they want. Who's to stop them late at night from watching whatever they want? Even a great parent won't always know.
So...the FTC essentially saying “parents don’t need to parent, we’ll just ruin UA-cam for everyone”. This is why the government never needs to be involved in personal lives and the internet.
Great quote by the big man himself: “I do not make films primarily for children. I make them for the child in all of us, whether he be six or sixty. Call the child innocence.” -Walt Disney I’m sure he would be sad if this goes into effect.
Benjamin Goodman I do too!! I don’t mind if some of my videos aren’t for kids sometimes, I JUST DON’T WANT THEM TO TAKE IT AWAY FOREVER!!!😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 COPPA Has to stop, or it’s goodbye UA-cam forever!!
These rules are so incredibly stupid. I'm a homeschool mom. I use UA-cam in my lessons A LOT. Everything from nature videos to science experiments to history lessons. Not everything I use comes from "kids channels". You know how many King of Random experiments we've done? I rely on the website to create and maintain playlists for the whole school year (and for future use, since I have more than one kid). Not being able to create playlists just because it's considered "kids content" is going to seriously throw my curriculum off track. I don't want to have to go and look up the videos I need every single time I need them. Parents need to take back responsibility and start monitoring what their kids watch, rather than expecting Big Daddy Government to solve all their problems.
The biggest problem is UA-cam, not Coppa. The FTC has said that they understand that some content is general audience, UA-cam just won't let people do it. Either you're shoved off the platform for being family friendly or make no money for being too edgy.
Oh dang i hadn't even thought about stuff like this. I used to work at a daycare/after school program and we watched music videos, craft videos, and science videos all the time. :(
Definitely! Parents and many other adults are upset because of what is happening to the children, but seem to not understand that they themselves are letting their children go on god knows where on the internet, and risking their childs privacy by letting them do so
I mean...it's getting more and more difficult to parent these days. This little rectangular internet machine in the palm of every kid's hands, they can secretly look at whatever they want. Who's to stop them late at night from watching whatever they want? Even a great parent won't always know. Even when I was in middle school when we had the earlier internet and early UA-cam I can vouch for being a kid looking up whatever I wish late at night when my parents didn't know. Do you expect parents to be watching 24/7? If kids want to see stuff, they'll find a way.
Legomaster50113 coppa does say you can make children content and if your video that is clearly for kids but you made it adult that is where sue comes in The problem is youtube adding where if you make children content your job simply going to be much difficult, another problem is another rule that was added in recent years where you are not allowed to do edgy/adult content so there’s no win-win situation here not to mention if there’s adult and children section then there should be everyone section (a channel for both adult and children or to certain age)
The way the FTC explains it is if your videos are with kids, think of Clifford the big Red Dog, and you talk like a preschool teacher would, your video is for kids only. If you're building something with Lego's, or walking through a theme park, and you're giving tips and tricks on something, your video is for adults. If UA-cam is pulling a fast one, that would be a big mistake, and could still be sued.
can someone comment for me this:I just want to say that I have seen many family-friendly videos and many videos that kids would like, and seen my cousins watch them, that is awesome. those videos make children laugh, and they learn stuff, like safe science experiments like, for example, how to make playdoh, or how to make slime, that these new rules might make them have to leave cause they need to pay bills. and I know that my cousins and even I would be sad to go. and daycare videos that make adults and kids laugh that have to stop for the same reasons. I get that your goal is to protect children, and I want that too, but I feel like you can do it less harshly. the way I would do it is that I would keep the "for kids" switch, but make it so that you keep the same rules as regular videos, but if there is swearing, cursing, or inappropriate stuff that children shouldn't see, then fine them. youtube is a job for all UA-camrs, they need it to pay the bills, and I feel that these new rules will put a lot of people out of their jobs. I am not hating on you guys, because I get the reasons, I just feel that this could be done in a better way. it wont let me do it
The FTC needs to stay out of UA-camrs channels. If it appears to be kid friendly, who decides that? It’s ridiculous. What I allow my children to watch or not watch is my decision and not the government’s.
Yes the corrupt government of the US of A rather not tell you that you're youngest child went to a field trip at a library or museum to listen to a story telling time and a reader is a cross dresser with his balls hanging out or the government does not need your permission about teaching your youngest child how to perform anal sex with a condom to a bunch of 3rd to 4th graders yikes and I Chihuahua trust me they're little experimentations on the youth of America for generations have come and gone destroying the future of America and it's youth so this doesn't surprise me at all with there next little big step if they ever want to have a good conscience and help people out they need to clean out their own closet 🐇
Dang it COPPA... all my favorite UA-camrs and myself are being threatened and I'm scared and kind of sad that this is happening in UA-cam. I pray everything will work out.
@@o_o5210: As someone who is also part of the anime community, I can vouche on that fact. Anime looks incredibly kid friendly, but it's by far one of the most adult mediums out there in terms of story telling.
Thank you friend, for this articulate video and helping spread the word. I’m as terrified as everyone else. Thanks for helping to inform everyone and helping us understand the situation better. I’m going to go check out the links you provided. I hope and pray something changes so we won’t all have to find new jobs next year! 🙈
Benjamin Goodman The problem is only 1% of users are using it and that violates the code below because they’ve run that statistic. They’re not advertising it very well and parents are not taking the full responsibility for this which is what the content creator I was watching prior to Brian was saying which I totally agree with. The agreement with the lawyers et cetera was that UA-cam are no longer going to be fined but the content creators were.But it just seems it’s a form of government control Repressing the creativity and trying to earn more money for something that may not be geared towards kids but because of something kids may like e.g. a journey to Disney that’s good towards adults and say like the planning of it they have to market up is kid friendly and get no feedback on their videos because they’re not allowed comments et cetera et cetera
Gregory DiBruno, i would love for the government to stop meddling in my parental decisions. I know what I want my kids exposed to. And with or without thier regulations, I'm still responsible.
@@caddiman1990 Its also not the Governments place to do so either. A SUPER hostile foreign army is invading? Sure Government,help to protect the children and the other civilians as well. Kids watching or seeing stuff on the internet that they really shouldn't be? Nope,just stop there Government. Its the parents' place to prevent and/or remedy that,not yours. This just seems like the Government maybe trying to take another step towards taking more control. That very last bit in the previous sentence. Is ONLY a hypothesis of mine,but you HAVE to at the very LEAST consider the possibility that is what they are doing or trying to anyway.
It's not the parent's fault either. COPPA was intended so parents have a CHOICE, which is not at all what this is doing. It's just a terrible terrible implementation/reaction. I feel UA-cam should have to better track what accounts get used by kids and not keep data on those, but all content that could possibly appeal to kids shouldn't be essentially shut down. It doesn't make sense.
@@kioku119 It LITERALLY is the parents responsibility and then fault,when they are not watching EXACTLY what their kids are doing and what type of content that their kids are consuming while they are online. That is considered to be a part of PARENTING and the parents should MAKE it their business to know EXACTLY the type of comment that their kids are consuming. And ONLY allow what they deem as appropriate for their kids to be consumed. Its NOT the governments responsibility to take responsibility for and hold kids' hands and do what the kids' parents should actually be doing. This would solve most of the problem,if parents just monitored ALL of their children's online activities and content consumption better. And was just more strict about it. If you involve the government in stuff like that,then NOTHING good can EVER really come of it....
@@mr.chaosvicious5968 I'm explicitly saying that the government should not be able to control what parents let their kids watch. I wasn't saying they should. While I disagree on other aspects we are saying the same thing in that regard..
Coppa: *_ALL ANIMATION IS FOR KIDS!_* Hazbin hotel: ... South park: ... Matt Groening: ... Family guy: ... Sausage party: ... Robot chicken: ... Many, many others: ...
Because some people just aren’t responsible enough to be parents in the first place. There are certain types of people that just shouldn’t be parents because they won’t be able to properly raise their children.
I was that age. I was rebellious. It's natural. Even if there is a good parent, kids still go and watch what they please late at night when their parents are asleep. You can't just expect them not to. It happens all the time and in every generation, kids have always been a little rebellious. Good parents or not.
This is straight from UA-cam’s terms of service: 12. Ability to Accept Terms of Service You affirm that you are either more than 18 years of age, or an emancipated minor, or possess legal parental or guardian consent, and are fully able and competent to enter into the terms, conditions, obligations, affirmations, representations, and warranties set forth in these Terms of Service, and to abide by and comply with these Terms of Service. In any case, you affirm that you are over the age of 13, as the Service is not intended for children under 13. If you are under 13 years of age, then please do not use the Service. There are lots of other great web sites for you. Talk to your parents about what sites are appropriate for you. So if you’re 12 and under on here, you’re violating their terms of service. That’s a liability that falls on your parents, not on content creators.
A very important UPDATE and a COPPA WORKAROUND. I'm starting to see that these kids vs adults videos is confusing the machine learning systems. The Thomas toy train adult buyers guide I did was set as my to be adult, but UA-cam flipped it to restricted ad's kids video. I now see UA-cam has flipped it back to being an adult video. I am getting screenshots of this, so it may look like there are ways of presenting toys and still remain an adult set video. It's all in the core context of the video. Make a toy, game or anime video in the right context and it will be an adult video on UA-cam. Sad so much fear mongering is going on it's destroying the confidence of creators. UA-cam have never backed down on a decision, but creators have always had to find a workaround.
Unfortunately that does fully solve the problem. Even making the users they know are children only use content based ads will tank channels with large child viewership. The issue is that UA-cam broke the law for 6 years and allowed content creators to unknowingly build businesses and lives off of their crime.
What I don't get is how it's the Creators's fault. Creators aren't collecting the data. Creators are just making videos. How are creators being fined here? Why not UA-cam or the ad companies themselves?
This rule has broken my heart But coppa has to consider that yt is a company and if they erase yt then they're leaving lots of people without a job and yt has been online for a lot of years, I really don't wanna believe this is happening
UA-cam 2018: "We are going to demonitize any content that isn't deemed 'family friendly'". UA-cam 2020: "We are going to demonitize any content that is too 'family friendly'". 🤦♂️
Ah whelp,it sounds like good Ol' Boob Toob here is just gonna get MySpace'd after New Years.... Seems like its just time to pack it up and head on over to Bitchute...
@@tommybombbird1317 You apparently misunderstood the context of how I was using the word "Boob" Tommy. I used the word Boob as in a dunce,stupid or silly person. Instead of using it in reference to a specific part of the female anatomy.
Yes. You don’t gather the data of people below the age of 18. Simple. That effects ad revenue the way it effects it. Let the cards fall where they may. Also, kid’s channels should be able to put themselves up on UA-cam Kids where the children will see generic toy ads. No data required. Kids like toys. Advertise toys.
Deon 'Deezy' Abeyta - Yeah you can. If it’s a kid’s video you just put a toy ad on there or a ad that’s tied to what the video’s about. Lego for instance.
@@Station9.75 the ads before videos are placed there automatically based on a computer algorithm. The video's creator doesn't have any choice in what ad is shown.
David Steven - I know. I run a UA-cam channel of my own. But UA-cam could easily solve this issue if they didn’t just want to absolve themselves of the whole thing.
We need to write to the FTC and request that anyone of any age can make a UA-cam account. Then propose making the user's site experience change based on the age of the user, so that comments and targeted ads vanish across the site if a user is under 13. In other words, COPPA needs to shift the focus to the viewer, rather than individual videos. The reason this whole thing started was because YT didn't allow those under 13 to make an account. Kids lied so they could make an account. But by allowing kids to make an account, the incentive to lie about their age to get onto YT vanishes, fixing the whole issue.
Hey Brian! Already signed the petition and commented on the FTC. I should let you know I did curse, but its because I'm so upset about how they plan on treating you and other UA-camrs like you. This isn't the government trying to do things for the better good, this is them trying to be bullies for no reason and the fact that they would even think of fining someone $42,000 PER VIDEO is proof of that. Stay strong! We support you and all other vloggers! Love you buddy!
Maybe someday parents will start acting like parents, and guiding their children's online as well as the rest of their lives. What a concept! Hoping for the best for you and others on here doing a decent channel.
You can't just teach your child right from wrong and just expect them to not look up whatever they want online. I was there, I know. I had excellent parents but I watched what I pleased secretly when my parents were asleep. Most kids do it...it's natural to be a little rebellious.
I don't make any money at all on my Channel it's just a Hobby for me I make Videos of my gameplay it's set on Private rightnow but the more I hear Iam unfortunately going to have to just Delete my Channel it's just not worth the risk really disappointed in this Hole situation!!
Okay but here's the thing though; who says what "kid-friendly" actually is? Adults. Who has to watch a video to see IF it is "kid-friendly"? Adults. See where I'm going? Now let that snowball.
I'm 41 and watch "child-attractive"channels too. The Ftc has basically said They'll mess over anyo e who has anything "child-attractive" whethet its for kids adults or both. They give no craps. Creators will be utterly ruined by the massive fines for marking child-attractive videos as not kid friendly when the government says otherwise. They don't care whose lives they ruin.
@@authorjoannawhite What would that solve? The problem is that kids share their personal information on here. Targeting adult content wouldn't change anything about that.
@@dracos0024 oh right. Well targeting kids stuff isnt gonna work either. Just ban kids from it till a certain age. Or make them use a special app like the youtube kids app
@@authorjoannawhite Oh, I wasn't saying that targeting kids content was gonna work, cause the person who came up with that can go get driven over by a bus for all I care. The problem is that UA-cam already has an age limit of 13+, but kids just lie about their age.
Signed and left comment on the FTC’s comment page. Good thing I’m skilled in the fine art of being cordial, because my thoughts on their law looked a lot kinder in writing than they did in my head :)
One of the clearest, simplest and No Nonsense videos I've seen on COPPA. Never heard of your channel before but I happen to see the thumbnail and the topic and decided to check it out. Great job! I hope for you and all of us that this doesn't go forward 100% as it is now.
Ok. I have never heard of you until Brizzy Voices mentioned you.I don't know if you will even see this comment. I however hope you do. You, just like any other UA-cam personality deserve to make the money of off ad revenues y'all do as do anyone else off of UA-cam. I have subscribed and hit the bell on your channel because it is all I can do at the moment. I am a recent college graduate and am trying to get my life in order. Having heard this, I am appalled. I am a former Army Soldier and am sick of what the government thinks they can get away with. You have my support 100%. Keep doing what you are doing. You have my support from here on out.
When I saw the title of this video, I immediately thought, "Oh, no, not Brian." Seriously though, it is the parents' fault. They throw their kids in a room with an Ipad to watch whatever they want on UA-cam. We need a serious shift in our culture. If nothing changes, January 1st, 2020 = Judgement Day
Same. I'm worrying for all of my favourite channels that I subscribed to and thinking which ones will be affected and needs help. Seeing Brian made me realise that he will be affected too.
@@singbike5832 if this keeps up, one day we'll wake up to another China, as in the US ends up being under authoritarian government. DON'T LET IT HAPPEN!
They even marked WW2 tanks as "made for kids" so if that's made for kids, I don't know what isn't. A lot of communities on YT (like animation and Lego) will be affected by this and I hope they make some changes before January. I don't think they realize there are adult fans of Lego and Disney, not all the sets Lego makes are for kids. Yes there are alternatives to YT but I have a feeling the FTC will follow us if we go to Vimeo or Bitchute
I just commented at the FTC: "Google/UA-cam is very capable of estimating the age of users regardless of their self-representations. Please require Google/UA-cam to protect the privacy of identified probable kids specifically by account rather than by video."
Brian is one of the most cheerful youtubers on this platform and it breaks my heart to listen to him talk about having to get a new job. Please if you haven't signed yet please consider signing the petition, not just for him but for every other family friendly youtube channel out there
As he said in the video personal ads make up 60-90% of youtuber revenue. If the got rid of it youtubers would either take a massive pay decrease or youtube would need to figure out another system to categorize how much the creators make
It might not. If you fall into at least 2 catagories of child friendly bam get fined up to $42k. Regardless of how many times you say anything non child friendly; if your videos are bright colored and contain animation bam! Breaking the rule There just are too many gray areas
heartfullbutterfly Yea, I know. I don’t think Brian would even be opposed to labeling his content as “kid-friendly” but, like you said, there’s too many grey areas and he would lose like 90% of his ad revenue. It’s not fair at all :/
@@heartfullbutterfly314 That second bit concerns me, I have a couple videos which are not what I would term kid-friendly--not horrible stuff, but not age appropriate for younger kids--but I used some animated films which might draw younger viewers in...debating on just taking those down. :/
@Magic gamer Polyglotlachance the system probably will flag it. Family guy while not child friendly, has a cute animation style that can attract children. That what I mean by a lot of grey areas
Can't the moderators of youtube have a system put in place that one, will auto choose if old videos are kid friendly or not, and two, also give you a warning via email saying that the video is kid friendly, if you post new ones and forget to label it kid friendly, or better yet, have you go through a process that you submit it, and then the moderator chooses the age level of the video for you, to eventually get posted at the right level? Next thing you know, the service will be telling us the site is strictly for purchasing movies and shows no longer on television.
They're not making a mistake, you just don't understand their goal. Protecting the kids is just a cover, the goal is censorship. You know what appeals to kids? Video games. You know who tends to say non PC things? Gamers. We've already seen some channels who only play M rated games have videos marked for kids, even after they changed the rating to not for kids someone manually goes through and sets it again to for kids. And unfortunately this means channels like this and those weird slime channels are going to get hurt for no reason. Because you're right. If this was just an attempt to protect kids then it's pretty dumb. But if you look at the bigger picture you can see why they do it.
There’s two problems with this 1: Sea Patrol (an Australian drama NOT intended for kids) is being considered as kids content. 2:Parents are not doing there job There is something seriously wrong here
Thank you Brian for bringing this up. I had know idea what this was until I watched this video. Then I looked more into it because my friend is a UA-camr who would also be affected by this change. The UA-cam people are billionaires and to them the fine isn’t even making a dent in their money. $42,000 dollars is a lot and I guess they think UA-camrs are rich because after they take away 80% of your money you can’t pay that fine. I would love to sign the petition but I am a young viewer, but not young enough to not understand what’s happening. This has been great but I can understand if you quit if this all happens. Thank you!
This is insane. I watched some of the hearing and they said, WORD FOR WORD: "The analogy I think of is the expression about shooting fish in a barrel. UA-cam is the barrel, and the content creators are the fish."
Thank you Brian. My biggest complaint against this country is the fact that it’s turning into a communist dictatorship. Instead of punishing the people that should be punished, they decide to enslave all of the people and let the criminal go free. There’s something really wrong with all of this. This is not a free country anymore. This country is making it harder and harder for the honest, taxpaying citizens to make a living. They’re interested in controlling the people by making them dependent And enslaving them. It’s heartbreaking.
sadly I didn't stumble on the channel before today. let's hope things do improve Happier note. seeing your impressions at disney. Considering background tales I've heard of sometimes nightmarish work experiences from princess employees etc.. it's honestly fairly obvious they've been happy with you showing up and doing those voices. definitely a different experience for them. and I think you brought some joy
If this coppa thing happens then we’re all going to get thanos snapped Including the Disneyland/family vloggers community As well as some other communities that thrive here
I'm so sorry dude. After your video about losing your dream job to become a youtuber and voice actor hearing that you may lose everything again is simply heartbreaking. I'm crying and wish I could give you a big hug
Hey Brian, I wanted to say that I’m sorry for the events taking place to you and other content creators. I would like to say that I have seen many of your videos and I find them to be very entertaining and enjoyable to watch. Watching this video breaks my heart because all you want to do is be a entertainer. I myself have consider starting a UA-cam channel but I can see that the FTC and Coppa has other things I’m mind. Keep your head brother because we all believe that this isn’t right. I work at a theme park so I know the enjoyment you can get out of stepping into a different world to find yourself and be who you really are. I appreciate you and other content creators for inspiring me to want to start a UA-cam channel but I’m sure viewers will agree with me to say that this sucks, but support is going to keep coming. Stay positive my friend. A kind message to keep your spirits up.
I saw Brain hull last Friday at Disney California Adventure he also pretty tall too so cool I didn't chance to talk him million voices I just got lucky I hope can see Brain again
Gosh, so when are they gonna shut down Ryan’s toy review, his channel is WAY WAY WAY more kidish and he is still here. UA-cam should’ve shut down Ryan’s channel and other baby shows, like no joke my 4 year old brother watches him on the regular UA-cam. This is just sad 😞. Brian doesn’t deserve this at all.
I might be misunderstanding, but I thought that the issue was that UA-cam will be making changes (granted, they're *terrible* changes) to kids' content videos, not that they would be actively shutting them down. Apologies in advance if I'm wrong.
I am 14 and I live this channel. I don't want to see it disappear. I have showed it to my 11 year old brother and he loves it. I have showed it to my parents and they injoy it. By doing this they are just making it worse because if kids don't have these to watch what are they going to do. I think they will either watch them anyway or do stuff that would be bad for them. Please don't hurt these wonderful people by doing this. I live this Chanel don't make it leave.💙
My man Timmy Turner said it best: "Adults ruin everything".
kinda yes but its more because kids under 13 are watching videos when there not support too. cause the parents can't be parents to the kids. why have kids if you can't parent them.
blessed
Best quote!
😂SO RIGHT
I like the Fresh prince, "Parents just don't understand."
THIS
IS
NOT
THE
WAY
TO
PROTECT
KIDS.
And Peggy take their ephones tablets away is way to do it
We dont need to protect them except from actual injuries. For example broken bones.
EXACTLY! This is being lazy and pandering to overprotective parents. This is not good.
And they could potentially be taking revenue from family vloggers which their parents USE to provide for their kids.
You heard it right there, even Peggy Schuyler disagrees with the FTC.
This is no longer UA-cam
They took the You out of it
Welcome to Tube
Fitting as its going down the tube
I mean there is just UA-cam kids
We don't want tube
@Tails 322
And they forgot the lube.
Tau The kids in this comment section are going to have a circus when the google what that is. Lmao.
"You" is going to the park
FOREVER
This literally makes the internet worse for kids 🤦🏼♂️
Preech
as brizzy voices said, “it’s not the ftc’s job to parent”
Unfortunately many parents' voices are saying "it's not our job to protect our children" to the FTC...
I mean...it's getting more and more difficult to parent these days. With this little rectangular internet machine in the palm of every kid's hands, they can secretly look at whatever they want. Who's to stop them late at night from watching whatever they want? Even a great parent won't always know.
Please read. www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2019/11/youtube-channel-owners-your-content-directed-children
Amen.
Exactly
So...the FTC essentially saying “parents don’t need to parent, we’ll just ruin UA-cam for everyone”. This is why the government never needs to be involved in personal lives and the internet.
Tis why we need less government in general.
Unfortunately, you can't force parents to be responsible.
EXACTLY! Are they doing this because they're all jerks?!
#walkaway from Obama's PC Democrat Plantation...UA-cam, Facebook, and Twitter are his Plantation Police.
It's not the FTC's fault that youtube can't regulate itself effectively.
Great quote by the big man himself: “I do not make films primarily for children. I make them for the child in all of us, whether he be six or sixty. Call the child innocence.” -Walt Disney
I’m sure he would be sad if this goes into effect.
I think he would be angry
I agree with this 100%
*when* , not if
THIS IS FACTS
Beautiful 🤧
Coppa is hurting youtubers career! You are one of my fav youtubers, and I'm glad you heard about this!
SophieDaisyGacha I agree!
I guess they didn’t know about the UA-cam KIDS app
Benjamin Goodman I don’t wanna lose my channel forever! I’m crying!!😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 They must stop!!!
Gregory DiBruno same, my channel means a lot, I don’t mind if my videos aren’t the best I just want our channels to stay 😭
Benjamin Goodman I do too!! I don’t mind if some of my videos aren’t for kids sometimes, I JUST DON’T WANT THEM TO TAKE IT AWAY FOREVER!!!😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 COPPA Has to stop, or it’s goodbye UA-cam forever!!
These rules are so incredibly stupid.
I'm a homeschool mom. I use UA-cam in my lessons A LOT. Everything from nature videos to science experiments to history lessons. Not everything I use comes from "kids channels". You know how many King of Random experiments we've done? I rely on the website to create and maintain playlists for the whole school year (and for future use, since I have more than one kid).
Not being able to create playlists just because it's considered "kids content" is going to seriously throw my curriculum off track. I don't want to have to go and look up the videos I need every single time I need them.
Parents need to take back responsibility and start monitoring what their kids watch, rather than expecting Big Daddy Government to solve all their problems.
The biggest problem is UA-cam, not Coppa. The FTC has said that they understand that some content is general audience, UA-cam just won't let people do it. Either you're shoved off the platform for being family friendly or make no money for being too edgy.
You said it sister!!!
Oh dang i hadn't even thought about stuff like this. I used to work at a daycare/after school program and we watched music videos, craft videos, and science videos all the time. :(
This change is going to ruin UA-cam’s child friendly channels
Nope, because those channels need only line their channel up on UA-cam Kids.
i will ruin all of youtube
Ruby Matthews Woolley not just child friendly Family friendly.
DANTDM
Hail dellor
Kids: lie about their age to make UA-cam accounts
FTC: Time to screw over the content creators
I say I was born in like 1980 but I really was born in 2007 -_-
@@_voidstar_6716 Your not really proving an opposing point there buddy
@@ryanbrady6252 basically I lie about my age. And UA-cam thinks I'm like a teenager or something but im 12 SO THATS MAH POINT.
@@_voidstar_6716 I get that but what does that prove besides what already been stated
@@_voidstar_6716 That means you're part of the problem there, kid.
This whole COPPA thing makes us so sad for all our favorite Disney UA-camrs 😔 we love you Brian!!
I never even notice or realised it was such a HUGE problem right now!
On Hawaii Time Me too! COPPA, Stop taking UA-cam away from us!!!
@@GregoryDiBruno Your lcon picture almost looks familiar or something!
Have we met before?
Dexter The Nostalgia Toonster I’m not sure.
@@GregoryDiBruno Maybe I have you confused with someone else!
The big issue at hand is parents let kids run around on the internet without any supervision.
Definitely! Parents and many other adults are upset because of what is happening to the children, but seem to not understand that they themselves are letting their children go on god knows where on the internet, and risking their childs privacy by letting them do so
#StopFTC #StopCoppa #SaveUA-cam !!!
Yup they dont be parents
I mean...it's getting more and more difficult to parent these days. This little rectangular internet machine in the palm of every kid's hands, they can secretly look at whatever they want. Who's to stop them late at night from watching whatever they want? Even a great parent won't always know. Even when I was in middle school when we had the earlier internet and early UA-cam I can vouch for being a kid looking up whatever I wish late at night when my parents didn't know. Do you expect parents to be watching 24/7? If kids want to see stuff, they'll find a way.
@@TECfan1 thats when u take things away from them
Coppa: you can't make content for kids
also Coppa: you can't make content not for kids or we sue
viewers: 🤔🤷♂️
Legomaster50113 coppa does say you can make children content and if your video that is clearly for kids but you made it adult that is where sue comes in
The problem is youtube adding where if you make children content your job simply going to be much difficult, another problem is another rule that was added in recent years where you are not allowed to do edgy/adult content so there’s no win-win situation here not to mention if there’s adult and children section then there should be everyone section (a channel for both adult and children or to certain age)
Please read www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2019/11/youtube-channel-owners-your-content-directed-children
The way the FTC explains it is if your videos are with kids, think of Clifford the big Red Dog, and you talk like a preschool teacher would, your video is for kids only. If you're building something with Lego's, or walking through a theme park, and you're giving tips and tricks on something, your video is for adults. If UA-cam is pulling a fast one, that would be a big mistake, and could still be sued.
can someone comment for me this:I just want to say that I have seen many family-friendly videos and many videos that kids would like, and seen my cousins watch them, that is awesome. those videos make children laugh, and they learn stuff, like safe science experiments like, for example, how to make playdoh, or how to make slime, that these new rules might make them have to leave cause they need to pay bills. and I know that my cousins and even I would be sad to go. and daycare videos that make adults and kids laugh that have to stop for the same reasons. I get that your goal is to protect children, and I want that too, but I feel like you can do it less harshly. the way I would do it is that I would keep the "for kids" switch, but make it so that you keep the same rules as regular videos, but if there is swearing, cursing, or inappropriate stuff that children shouldn't see, then fine them. youtube is a job for all UA-camrs, they need it to pay the bills, and I feel that these new rules will put a lot of people out of their jobs. I am not hating on you guys, because I get the reasons, I just feel that this could be done in a better way. it wont let me do it
Coppa:*exist*
UA-camrs: we are dead
Me. Beast: Hits 19,999,999 trees planted
FTC: Shuts down the fundraiser
The FTC needs to stay out of UA-camrs channels. If it appears to be kid friendly, who decides that? It’s ridiculous. What I allow my children to watch or not watch is my decision and not the government’s.
Your right. who gets to decides if its kid friendly
Yes the corrupt government of the US of A rather not tell you that you're youngest child went to a field trip at a library or museum to listen to a story telling time and a reader is a cross dresser with his balls hanging out or the government does not need your permission about teaching your youngest child how to perform anal sex with a condom to a bunch of 3rd to 4th graders yikes and I Chihuahua trust me they're little experimentations on the youth of America for generations have come and gone destroying the future of America and it's youth so this doesn't surprise me at all with there next little big step if they ever want to have a good conscience and help people out they need to clean out their own closet 🐇
Flying Through Life Now Flightlife I agree
That's what the government always tries to do. It's called stupidity
This is nothing about the kids. This is carte blanche for the government to institute a systematic and standardized method of censorship.
So sad my daughter (5yo) literally teared up and asked me “ So no more Brian at Disneyland?”
Luis Wiley 😭
Luis Wiley That hurts my heart!!
That s so sad im so sorry
😭
That is so sad!
Dang it COPPA... all my favorite UA-camrs and myself are being threatened and I'm scared and kind of sad that this is happening in UA-cam.
I pray everything will work out.
@Joselyn Vifquain yah I agree but I wish COPPA would understand that there are better ways to deal with this problem
EXACTLY, I wish COPPA would understand that sometimes toys, characters, happy music and colors don’t mean exclusively kids content
Bendy at least no more 5 minute crafts and troom troom
@@o_o5210: As someone who is also part of the anime community, I can vouche on that fact. Anime looks incredibly kid friendly, but it's by far one of the most adult mediums out there in terms of story telling.
:c I sad
Thank you friend, for this articulate video and helping spread the word. I’m as terrified as everyone else. Thanks for helping to inform everyone and helping us understand the situation better. I’m going to go check out the links you provided. I hope and pray something changes so we won’t all have to find new jobs next year! 🙈
I just cannot believe this, it is such a shame, it’s almost like big brother is taking over, oh sorry I meant the government...
The Democrat Party is Big Brother...#walkaway...Trump 2020
Harry Kuheim : big brother took over in January 2017. Welcome to the United States of fascism led by lying, traitor trump.
It literally is big brother. And this is only the beginning....
@@harrykuheim6107 Yet there is a Republican president in the white house when this law goes into effect....hmm. There's some flawed logic there.🤔🤔
@@tamarrosenberg-walker7599 You're adorable if you think it started only that recently.
I guess they don’t know about the UA-cam KIDS app, why do they have to do this 😭
Benjamin Goodman The problem is only 1% of users are using it and that violates the code below because they’ve run that statistic. They’re not advertising it very well and parents are not taking the full responsibility for this which is what the content creator I was watching prior to Brian was saying which I totally agree with. The agreement with the lawyers et cetera was that UA-cam are no longer going to be fined but the content creators were.But it just seems it’s a form of government control Repressing the creativity and trying to earn more money for something that may not be geared towards kids but because of something kids may like e.g. a journey to Disney that’s good towards adults and say like the planning of it they have to market up is kid friendly and get no feedback on their videos because they’re not allowed comments et cetera et cetera
The Annie Keever Company. AGREED!!!
Indeed
UA-cam Watcher COPPA needs to stop now!!
Gregory DiBruno, i would love for the government to stop meddling in my parental decisions. I know what I want my kids exposed to. And with or without thier regulations, I'm still responsible.
I hate this...
It should be the parents fault . Doesnt UA-cam have a kids UA-cam still.
Yes he just mentioned that and it's still not good enough for the government to protect kids.
@@caddiman1990 Its also not the Governments place to do so either. A SUPER hostile foreign army is invading? Sure Government,help to protect the children and the other civilians as well. Kids watching or seeing stuff on the internet that they really shouldn't be? Nope,just stop there Government. Its the parents' place to prevent and/or remedy that,not yours. This just seems like the Government maybe trying to take another step towards taking more control. That very last bit in the previous sentence. Is ONLY a hypothesis of mine,but you HAVE to at the very LEAST consider the possibility that is what they are doing or trying to anyway.
It's not the parent's fault either. COPPA was intended so parents have a CHOICE, which is not at all what this is doing. It's just a terrible terrible implementation/reaction. I feel UA-cam should have to better track what accounts get used by kids and not keep data on those, but all content that could possibly appeal to kids shouldn't be essentially shut down. It doesn't make sense.
@@kioku119 It LITERALLY is the parents responsibility and then fault,when they are not watching EXACTLY what their kids are doing and what type of content that their kids are consuming while they are online. That is considered to be a part of PARENTING and the parents should MAKE it their business to know EXACTLY the type of comment that their kids are consuming. And ONLY allow what they deem as appropriate for their kids to be consumed. Its NOT the governments responsibility to take responsibility for and hold kids' hands and do what the kids' parents should actually be doing. This would solve most of the problem,if parents just monitored ALL of their children's online activities and content consumption better. And was just more strict about it. If you involve the government in stuff like that,then NOTHING good can EVER really come of it....
@@mr.chaosvicious5968 I'm explicitly saying that the government should not be able to control what parents let their kids watch. I wasn't saying they should. While I disagree on other aspects we are saying the same thing in that regard..
Coppa: *_ALL ANIMATION IS FOR KIDS!_*
Hazbin hotel: ...
South park: ...
Matt Groening: ...
Family guy: ...
Sausage party: ...
Robot chicken: ...
Many, many others: ...
Frick that! IKR?
THERE IS YT KIDS FOR A REASON! And why can’t parents just be bloody parents
Because some people just aren’t responsible enough to be parents in the first place. There are certain types of people that just shouldn’t be parents because they won’t be able to properly raise their children.
@@Gameoverstudios UA-cam kids
I hope nothing gets bloody over this!!
Y’all British af
To be honest, I am a kid but I downloaded UA-cam kids and it is rubbish and I can't even watch cool stuff.
Lmao ain't no way a kid ISN'T gonna find a way around everything that's being implemented. The FTC just feels like a joke in some aspects :(
Kids will definitely find a way to get to the content they want to watch no matter what.
There is a general audience exception for COPPA. UA-cam doesn't want to deal with the hassle around accommodating it.
It is a joke.
FTC needs to stop this. It’s madness.
Maddie Koester I agree!
There is literally nothing UA-cam can do, this is the law in the US.
They cant. Its not them doing it. Its the government. UA-cam is doing this because they've been fined for over 300 million dollars from coppa
All youtube can do is watch and wait
Watermelon I thought it was 160M?
Parents need to be responsible! They should be responsible on what their children watch and Monitor what they watch.
^^^^^^^ THIS
Exactly.
Ikr
Tell that to the boomer generation
Parents are lazy they dont want to 🙄
UA-cam will die because of these guidelines (because parents don’t want to parent their kids)
Yup so true they dont. Parent ther kids man i sen it first hand
I was that age. I was rebellious. It's natural. Even if there is a good parent, kids still go and watch what they please late at night when their parents are asleep. You can't just expect them not to. It happens all the time and in every generation, kids have always been a little rebellious. Good parents or not.
This just seems like they are punishing people that make family friendly content. Wow, this is awful.
Yup, dont forget how they also punish more edgy content.
This is straight from UA-cam’s terms of service:
12. Ability to Accept Terms of Service
You affirm that you are either more than 18 years of age, or an emancipated minor, or possess legal parental or guardian consent, and are fully able and competent to enter into the terms, conditions, obligations, affirmations, representations, and warranties set forth in these Terms of Service, and to abide by and comply with these Terms of Service. In any case, you affirm that you are over the age of 13, as the Service is not intended for children under 13. If you are under 13 years of age, then please do not use the Service. There are lots of other great web sites for you. Talk to your parents about what sites are appropriate for you.
So if you’re 12 and under on here, you’re violating their terms of service. That’s a liability that falls on your parents, not on content creators.
It's terrible that they are doing this, I already signed and wrote a comment telling the FTC what I think of it.
Thank you Moana
@Rickey H. Nice one 😎
Rickey H. Good one mate
I signed the petition. Hang in there Brian. Your fans are here for you.
Oh no not you to! Now COPPA has crossed the line!
Here's some updated KIDS channel data to digest. 300.000 views on UA-cam and income earned $30. What a joke. RIP UA-cam KIDS
A very important UPDATE and a COPPA WORKAROUND. I'm starting to see that these kids vs adults videos is confusing the machine learning systems. The Thomas toy train adult buyers guide I did was set as my to be adult, but UA-cam flipped it to restricted ad's kids video. I now see UA-cam has flipped it back to being an adult video. I am getting screenshots of this, so it may look like there are ways of presenting toys and still remain an adult set video. It's all in the core context of the video. Make a toy, game or anime video in the right context and it will be an adult video on UA-cam. Sad so much fear mongering is going on it's destroying the confidence of creators. UA-cam have never backed down on a decision, but creators have always had to find a workaround.
leokimvideo COPPA will fine “workarounds” for $42,000 per video if they deem a “not for kids” video to be in fact “made for kids”.
Comments disabled is annoying they have other apps for kids
Good luck Brian I support you ❤️
Why isn't UA-cam doing something about the target marketing? It is where the problem is coming from!
Unfortunately that does fully solve the problem. Even making the users they know are children only use content based ads will tank channels with large child viewership. The issue is that UA-cam broke the law for 6 years and allowed content creators to unknowingly build businesses and lives off of their crime.
What I don't get is how it's the Creators's fault. Creators aren't collecting the data. Creators are just making videos. How are creators being fined here? Why not UA-cam or the ad companies themselves?
This rule has broken my heart
But coppa has to consider that yt is a company and if they erase yt then they're leaving lots of people without a job and yt has been online for a lot of years, I really don't wanna believe this is happening
If parents would only actually parent these days.
Many parents ARE parenting.
Its just the government that wants to win more control over the populace.
Entitlement is running rampant. Parents need to raise their children and not expect everyone else they come in contact with do it for them.
UA-cam 2018: "We are going to demonitize any content that isn't deemed 'family friendly'".
UA-cam 2020: "We are going to demonitize any content that is too 'family friendly'". 🤦♂️
Geez, that's awful. This whole thing makes me mad.
UA-cam: Now swearing or anything like that
Also UA-cam: No family friendly stuff
I hope this law doesn't get allowed I don't want to be discouraged by just some kids watching yt I am scared now
Its already a law UA-cam was violating for years.
@@WillisPtheone Pls tell me it will be taken down? PLS! I am too scared to even do new videos or reaction or vlogs
Ah whelp,it sounds like good Ol' Boob Toob here is just gonna get MySpace'd after New Years.... Seems like its just time to pack it up and head on over to Bitchute...
@@mr.chaosvicious5968 dude don't give up! Also language
@@tommybombbird1317 You apparently misunderstood the context of how I was using the word "Boob" Tommy. I used the word Boob as in a dunce,stupid or silly person. Instead of using it in reference to a specific part of the female anatomy.
UA-cam needs to step up and take more responsibility for this.
Yes. You don’t gather the data of people below the age of 18. Simple.
That effects ad revenue the way it effects it. Let the cards fall where they may.
Also, kid’s channels should be able to put themselves up on UA-cam Kids where the children will see generic toy ads. No data required. Kids like toys. Advertise toys.
if they're mad about the personalized adds taking peoples info, than just change that.
Don’t be crazy. That would be good for the content creators. We can’t have that...
You can't. Then the content Creator's won't get paid for the videos.
Deon 'Deezy' Abeyta - Yeah you can. If it’s a kid’s video you just put a toy ad on there or a ad that’s tied to what the video’s about. Lego for instance.
@@Station9.75 the ads before videos are placed there automatically based on a computer algorithm. The video's creator doesn't have any choice in what ad is shown.
David Steven - I know. I run a UA-cam channel of my own. But UA-cam could easily solve this issue if they didn’t just want to absolve themselves of the whole thing.
We need to write to the FTC and request that anyone of any age can make a UA-cam account. Then propose making the user's site experience change based on the age of the user, so that comments and targeted ads vanish across the site if a user is under 13. In other words, COPPA needs to shift the focus to the viewer, rather than individual videos. The reason this whole thing started was because YT didn't allow those under 13 to make an account. Kids lied so they could make an account. But by allowing kids to make an account, the incentive to lie about their age to get onto YT vanishes, fixing the whole issue.
This is a great idea. You should put this in a comment on the FTC's website. Here's the link: www.regulations.gov/comment?D=FTC-2019-0054-0001
This will mess up everything, UA-cam is going to become a thing of the past. Streamers will become the next career.
There is a thing called UA-cam KIDS they need to cut the bs.
Ikr🤩🤩😀😀🤗🤗
Amen Botha
The Kids app is the fucking problem. People are making inappropriate content and is marking it as Family Friendly.
but youtube kids is a app for a phone. not everyone has a phone they can use to watch it. if they had it for a pc then this wouldn't be a problem
@@Blackcatfelicia2002moderation in kids app is nothing compared to UA-cam .
This whole Coppa thing's probably been going on for 7 years??
Boy, time RREEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLYY went by that quick!
and i don't like it.
I agree
It's now a problem.
i dont see a problem so lack of data no big deal to me.
@@willhuey4891 Maybe to you its not.
But its sort of a problem for other people to understand what is going on.
I also didn't know that until now.
Hey Brian! Already signed the petition and commented on the FTC. I should let you know I did curse, but its because I'm so upset about how they plan on treating you and other UA-camrs like you. This isn't the government trying to do things for the better good, this is them trying to be bullies for no reason and the fact that they would even think of fining someone $42,000 PER VIDEO is proof of that. Stay strong! We support you and all other vloggers! Love you buddy!
Maybe someday parents will start acting like parents, and guiding their children's online as well as the rest of their lives. What a concept! Hoping for the best for you and others on here doing a decent channel.
You can't just teach your child right from wrong and just expect them to not look up whatever they want online. I was there, I know. I had excellent parents but I watched what I pleased secretly when my parents were asleep. Most kids do it...it's natural to be a little rebellious.
This sounds like it’s going to make starting my channel even harder. My intended audience is everyone.
I don't make any money at all on my Channel it's just a Hobby for me I make Videos of my gameplay it's set on Private rightnow but the more I hear Iam unfortunately going to have to just Delete my Channel it's just not worth the risk really disappointed in this Hole situation!!
I’m almost 20 and I would rather watch “kid friendly” videos but you know I guess only kids are suppose to
I'm 36. I only watch the kid friendly stuff. This is not good
I’m 30 and I only watch kid friendly stuff. God are Heavenly Father wants us to have a child mind sight.
Okay but here's the thing though; who says what "kid-friendly" actually is? Adults. Who has to watch a video to see IF it is "kid-friendly"? Adults. See where I'm going? Now let that snowball.
I'm 41 and watch "child-attractive"channels too. The Ftc has basically said They'll mess over anyo e who has anything "child-attractive" whethet its for kids adults or both. They give no craps. Creators will be utterly ruined by the massive fines for marking child-attractive videos as not kid friendly when the government says otherwise. They don't care whose lives they ruin.
And another thing: how about we target ADULT content and make sure that children can't access that???
Thats what I don't understand about this. If you want kids to be safe then why not target channels who are doing too much adult content?
@@authorjoannawhite What would that solve? The problem is that kids share their personal information on here. Targeting adult content wouldn't change anything about that.
@@dracos0024 oh right. Well targeting kids stuff isnt gonna work either. Just ban kids from it till a certain age. Or make them use a special app like the youtube kids app
@@authorjoannawhite Oh, I wasn't saying that targeting kids content was gonna work, cause the person who came up with that can go get driven over by a bus for all I care.
The problem is that UA-cam already has an age limit of 13+, but kids just lie about their age.
Unless every parent can be monitored to make sure they do not let their kids watch UA-cam below the age of 13, that won't work either.
I already signed the petition and submitted a comment to the FTC. Fighting for all you creators and I hope we can get this resolved!
Signed and left comment on the FTC’s comment page.
Good thing I’m skilled in the fine art of being cordial, because my thoughts on their law looked a lot kinder in writing than they did in my head :)
Coppa need to stop, UA-cam is on
Trouble!!!
Everyone make their thumbnails terrifying starting December 1st.
COPPA: I am inevitable!
People who signed the STOP COPPA petition: And we.. are.. *UA-cam*
AMEN
Yes sir!
One of the clearest, simplest and No Nonsense videos I've seen on COPPA. Never heard of your channel before but I happen to see the thumbnail and the topic and decided to check it out. Great job! I hope for you and all of us that this doesn't go forward 100% as it is now.
Ok. I have never heard of you until Brizzy Voices mentioned you.I don't know if you will even see this comment. I however hope you do. You, just like any other UA-cam personality deserve to make the money of off ad revenues y'all do as do anyone else off of UA-cam. I have subscribed and hit the bell on your channel because it is all I can do at the moment. I am a recent college graduate and am trying to get my life in order. Having heard this, I am appalled. I am a former Army Soldier and am sick of what the government thinks they can get away with. You have my support 100%. Keep doing what you are doing. You have my support from here on out.
When I saw the title of this video, I immediately thought, "Oh, no, not Brian."
Seriously though, it is the parents' fault. They throw their kids in a room with an Ipad to watch whatever they want on UA-cam. We need a serious shift in our culture.
If nothing changes, January 1st, 2020 = Judgement Day
Same. I'm worrying for all of my favourite channels that I subscribed to and thinking which ones will be affected and needs help. Seeing Brian made me realise that he will be affected too.
AGREE. And this stuff is only going to get worse as we continuing throwing our freedoms away and trying to control everything through legislation.
You guys are so much more agreeable and civil than another video I commented on about this same subject. Thank you all
@@zacharysanvicente2276 What video was being uncivilised?
@@singbike5832 if this keeps up, one day we'll wake up to another China, as in the US ends up being under authoritarian government. DON'T LET IT HAPPEN!
I already signed it and told them what I think
Same three times I'll tell them more.
How do u do it
@@minnieandbarbie209 he has a link for the petition and the other thing
@@littledoegamingakathedeerq1702 ok thank you for helping
@@minnieandbarbie209 welcome
They even marked WW2 tanks as "made for kids" so if that's made for kids, I don't know what isn't. A lot of communities on YT (like animation and Lego) will be affected by this and I hope they make some changes before January. I don't think they realize there are adult fans of Lego and Disney, not all the sets Lego makes are for kids. Yes there are alternatives to YT but I have a feeling the FTC will follow us if we go to Vimeo or Bitchute
I just commented at the FTC: "Google/UA-cam is very capable of estimating the age of users regardless of their self-representations. Please require Google/UA-cam to protect the privacy of identified probable kids specifically by account rather than by video."
Thank you for explaining in detail. We will be signing, commenting on the FTC and praying they find a different solution.
You inspire everyone
Brian is one of the most cheerful youtubers on this platform and it breaks my heart to listen to him talk about having to get a new job. Please if you haven't signed yet please consider signing the petition, not just for him but for every other family friendly youtube channel out there
I hate you, FTC! This new policy is garage!
Haley Mitchell *garbage
Dillon Ohlemiller oops! Apparently I can’t spell!😅
Whoops, lol
Can I park my car in this new policy?
Dracos002 uhh... I don’t think so! 🤣
Me: sees title of this video
Also me: NO ILL NEVER SEE BRIAN AGAIN
The FTC is like the internet’s Karen
Why can’t UA-cam get rid of personalized ads
Google owns UA-cam, and this is how they make their money -
Collecting private information and selling it on for the creation of personalised ads
Really any free app or website was only kept around or bought by big companies, because it could be monetised with advertising
It would cut the amount of money that the UA-camrs make by 80 to 90 percent. Therefore also reducing what UA-cam makes.
As he said in the video personal ads make up 60-90% of youtuber revenue. If the got rid of it youtubers would either take a massive pay decrease or youtube would need to figure out another system to categorize how much the creators make
UA-cam is making a big mistake and is about to lose a lot of money. Most of the money that UA-camrs make are because of kids!
Cici Tomei it’s not UA-cam choosing this. It’s the government FORCING UA-cam to do this.
As the other person said, this is a law, not a choice for UA-cam, which sucks, but not UA-cam's fault this time.
UA-cam will most likely shut down
I understand wanting to protect children, but this is absolutely ridiculous
but is it for the kids, it's more like for the money
I too can understand that it's to protect kids' information, but still, I agree. Why disable comments, notification, notification bells, etc.?
Just say “F***” at the start of every video and you’re good. That’s a joke but judging by what you said it might work lol.
It might not. If you fall into at least 2 catagories of child friendly bam get fined up to $42k. Regardless of how many times you say anything non child friendly; if your videos are bright colored and contain animation bam! Breaking the rule
There just are too many gray areas
heartfullbutterfly Yea, I know. I don’t think Brian would even be opposed to labeling his content as “kid-friendly” but, like you said, there’s too many grey areas and he would lose like 90% of his ad revenue. It’s not fair at all :/
@@heartfullbutterfly314 That second bit concerns me, I have a couple videos which are not what I would term kid-friendly--not horrible stuff, but not age appropriate for younger kids--but I used some animated films which might draw younger viewers in...debating on just taking those down. :/
@Magic gamer Polyglotlachance the system probably will flag it. Family guy while not child friendly, has a cute animation style that can attract children. That what I mean by a lot of grey areas
He wants his videos to be kid friendly though.
Maybe every channel on youtube should do a class action against the ftc.
I wish man. But probably they can't do that. The government will side with the FTC.
As soon as I saw the title on my notifications pop up, I immediately thought “oh no not you!!!”
Me too
So did I
This comment alone made me cry! :(
Same
me ocurrió lo mismo bro..
I don’t let my kid use UA-cam or any other place that’s not kid friendly.
It's good to know that there are still responsible parents like you are out there.
Sounds like I may become perfectly safe for kids, now.
Finally a responsible parent out there
Can't the moderators of youtube have a system put in place that one, will auto choose if old videos are kid friendly or not, and two, also give you a warning via email saying that the video is kid friendly, if you post new ones and forget to label it kid friendly, or better yet, have you go through a process that you submit it, and then the moderator chooses the age level of the video for you, to eventually get posted at the right level?
Next thing you know, the service will be telling us the site is strictly for purchasing movies and shows no longer on television.
They're not making a mistake, you just don't understand their goal. Protecting the kids is just a cover, the goal is censorship. You know what appeals to kids? Video games. You know who tends to say non PC things? Gamers. We've already seen some channels who only play M rated games have videos marked for kids, even after they changed the rating to not for kids someone manually goes through and sets it again to for kids.
And unfortunately this means channels like this and those weird slime channels are going to get hurt for no reason. Because you're right. If this was just an attempt to protect kids then it's pretty dumb. But if you look at the bigger picture you can see why they do it.
Correct, but also wrong, COPPA brings solutions and problems to the table, but why cant they just tell the parents about youtube kids?
There’s two problems with this
1: Sea Patrol (an Australian drama NOT intended for kids) is being considered as kids content.
2:Parents are not doing there job
There is something seriously wrong here
I signed the petition, and also encourage all of you to also sign this petition.
Signed the petition and left a comment. I hope everything ends up ok for your channel!
Coppa “perfectly balance as all things should be.”
PewDiePie “UA-camrs!... Assemble!”
Coppa “I am inevitable!”
PewDiePie “And I am PewDiePie!”
Yes!!!!!!!
Yahoo!
I'd watch that
UA-cam: (snaps the fingers) I'm no longer responsible. I gave you guys a couple boxes to check. Have at it.
Thank you Brian for bringing this up. I had know idea what this was until I watched this video. Then I looked more into it because my friend is a UA-camr who would also be affected by this change. The UA-cam people are billionaires and to them the fine isn’t even making a dent in their money. $42,000 dollars is a lot and I guess they think UA-camrs are rich because after they take away 80% of your money you can’t pay that fine. I would love to sign the petition but I am a young viewer, but not young enough to not understand what’s happening. This has been great but I can understand if you quit if this all happens. Thank you!
I get that they are trying to protect the kids, but this is crazy!
This is insane. I watched some of the hearing and they said, WORD FOR WORD: "The analogy I think of is the expression about shooting fish in a barrel. UA-cam is the barrel, and the content creators are the fish."
UA-camr: *makes a video that says "pee pee poo poo"*
COPPA: *angry government noises*
The apocalypse was a FEVER, compared to this plague I'm Deming the COPPAcalypse
#COPPAcalypse let’s make this a thing lol
Thank you Brian. My biggest complaint against this country is the fact that it’s turning into a communist dictatorship. Instead of punishing the people that should be punished, they decide to enslave all of the people and let the criminal go free. There’s something really wrong with all of this. This is not a free country anymore. This country is making it harder and harder for the honest, taxpaying citizens to make a living. They’re interested in controlling the people by making them dependent And enslaving them. It’s heartbreaking.
sadly I didn't stumble on the channel before today. let's hope things do improve
Happier note. seeing your impressions at disney. Considering background tales I've heard of sometimes nightmarish work experiences from princess employees etc.. it's honestly fairly obvious they've been happy with you showing up and doing those voices. definitely a different experience for them. and I think you brought some joy
This is so unfair, how would they like it if they took away their job, and Disney isn’t just for kids. adults like it too if not more
UA-cam: sorry adult content channels you're not getting monetized.
FTC: UA-cam, you missed one.
If this coppa thing happens then we’re all going to get thanos snapped
Including the Disneyland/family vloggers community
As well as some other communities that thrive here
Don’t forget my crafty crew! (Not five minute crafts or any of those lol)
Gacha community
It's gonna hurt Disney too. Because then people who want to watch videos on Disney Parks can't get ads or info.
Nick Is Awesome Does that mean we can’t watch Disney vloggers anymore?
@MegaMegaminecrafter1 it depends if those channels get taken down.
I'm so sorry dude. After your video about losing your dream job to become a youtuber and voice actor hearing that you may lose everything again is simply heartbreaking. I'm crying and wish I could give you a big hug
Hey Brian,
I wanted to say that I’m sorry for the events taking place to you and other content creators. I would like to say that I have seen many of your videos and I find them to be very entertaining and enjoyable to watch.
Watching this video breaks my heart because all you want to do is be a entertainer. I myself have consider starting a UA-cam channel but I can see that the FTC and Coppa has other things I’m mind.
Keep your head brother because we all believe that this isn’t right. I work at a theme park so I know the enjoyment you can get out of stepping into a different world to find yourself and be who you really are.
I appreciate you and other content creators for inspiring me to want to start a UA-cam channel but I’m sure viewers will agree with me to say that this sucks, but support is going to keep coming. Stay positive my friend.
A kind message to keep your spirits up.
I saw Brain hull last Friday at Disney California Adventure he also pretty tall too so cool I didn't chance to talk him million voices I just got lucky I hope can see Brain again
Gosh, so when are they gonna shut down Ryan’s toy review, his channel is WAY WAY WAY more kidish and he is still here. UA-cam should’ve shut down Ryan’s channel and other baby shows, like no joke my 4 year old brother watches him on the regular UA-cam. This is just sad 😞. Brian doesn’t deserve this at all.
ASMR with Sophia not to mention he now has a show on Nick jr🙄
I might be misunderstanding, but I thought that the issue was that UA-cam will be making changes (granted, they're *terrible* changes) to kids' content videos, not that they would be actively shutting them down. Apologies in advance if I'm wrong.
We need to stop coppa!
I am 14 and I live this channel. I don't want to see it disappear. I have showed it to my 11 year old brother and he loves it. I have showed it to my parents and they injoy it. By doing this they are just making it worse because if kids don't have these to watch what are they going to do. I think they will either watch them anyway or do stuff that would be bad for them. Please don't hurt these wonderful people by doing this. I live this Chanel don't make it leave.💙
SO basically thanos will snap in the new year