Phillips curve | Inflation - measuring the cost of living | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лют 2012
  • Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacademy.org/economics...
    The observation that inflation and unemployment tend to be inversely correlated
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacademy.org/economics...
    Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacademy.org/economics...
    Macroeconomics on Khan Academy: Topics covered in a traditional college level introductory macroeconomics course
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy's Macroeconomics channel: / channel
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 76

  • @xoLaruhh
    @xoLaruhh 9 років тому +143

    You sir are incredible, I'm passing math because of you and now I can pass economics. What can't you do??

    • @rahadhossainmizi3969
      @rahadhossainmizi3969 3 роки тому +3

      Celebrate 😜👍

    • @tariquezafar5265
      @tariquezafar5265 3 роки тому +2

      Ohh thank you xoLaruhh😊👍

    • @samer9530
      @samer9530 3 місяці тому +1

      After eight years since your initial comment, have you pursued a career in economics? Are you currently employed in the field related to this topic? I'm kinda second guessing my study choices right now and just curious about your journey

    • @xoLaruhh
      @xoLaruhh 3 місяці тому

      @@samer9530😂😂😂 I finished my masters in Economics, only to work at Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), get carpel tunnel, fall into depression at my desk job and do a complete 180 and go into real estate (which economics has helped with)
      All in all I did enjoy economics and would still advise to study it, I love the study. Just work-wise didn’t work out for me

  • @subhasispan9846
    @subhasispan9846 8 років тому +6

    THANK YOU! you have made it so simple, so reasonable.

  • @silasdee7865
    @silasdee7865 3 роки тому +4

    Amazing class!!
    You have the gift of simplification.....can't thank you enough for what you are doing with Khan Academy.

  • @linhtrangpham1995
    @linhtrangpham1995 9 років тому +12

    I regret that I didn't find that video to learn when I study phillip curve in macro course :(.

  • @abhinavitsmebellamy
    @abhinavitsmebellamy 4 роки тому +5

    Thank you, Sir. Really well explained!!

  • @lessmoneylessproblems5145
    @lessmoneylessproblems5145 Рік тому +2

    This video is very relevant in 2022

  • @muhammadyaseenbulbule9638
    @muhammadyaseenbulbule9638 4 роки тому +2

    Thank You For Making It Simple

  • @prab3636
    @prab3636 7 років тому +31

    Im just wondering...does this man know everything? He's helped me with series for AP calc bc and ap physics before, and macro too?!

    • @oliversissonphone6143
      @oliversissonphone6143 3 роки тому +2

      It's not that hard to know a few first year university subjects well..

    • @KM-wb1yd
      @KM-wb1yd 3 роки тому +3

      Sal actually spends a lot of time studying himself and learning the concepts well enough to teach others. This is his full time, so it makes sense that he knows "everything" :)

  • @jakepelter4045
    @jakepelter4045 11 років тому +6

    Central Banks and Politicians "love it" because it is true in the short run usually.
    The Philips Curve is very useful.

  • @hafizhadea
    @hafizhadea 8 років тому +22

    It's well explained but I think it still lacks of information. How about the New Keynesian Philips Curve, New Classical version, and how the formula is..

  • @bienleminh1667
    @bienleminh1667 28 днів тому

    how can this man know literally everthing?

  • @ilikechess1
    @ilikechess1 12 років тому +2

    Superb! Once again.

  • @lacrypta212
    @lacrypta212 Рік тому +1

    Visiting this in 2022, amazing how times repeat themselves lol

  • @PEFOBE007
    @PEFOBE007 11 років тому +3

    Thank you

  • @necrashroudpublications604
    @necrashroudpublications604 9 років тому +2

    thank you sir very helpfull

  • @Insanox2
    @Insanox2 11 років тому +7

    khan academy video on solow growth model please

  • @chinmaycm9697
    @chinmaycm9697 5 років тому +1

    Nicely explained.....

  • @yoannaasenova5321
    @yoannaasenova5321 5 років тому

    Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

  • @ftorresgamez
    @ftorresgamez 12 років тому +2

    @RyogaShark,
    Not necessarily "higher employment". If you have price floors on labor, you can have high demand and still high unemployment.
    The problem with Keynesian economics is that Keynesians tend to lump people's economic decisions into simplistic categories. For instance, they would lump together all employment and all wages to determine an average wage, when in fact people work in very diverse and different fields, with different productivity outputs.

  • @ngatruong5710
    @ngatruong5710 6 років тому +1

    His voice is beautiful

  • @hazaler
    @hazaler 9 років тому +5

    i wish that i found you 2 weeks earlier ..

  • @unknownunknown1600
    @unknownunknown1600 4 роки тому

    May God bless you man

  • @jhlim
    @jhlim 6 років тому

    Very nice explanation of what the philips curve is. However data does not support this in the US. Correlation between between unemployment rate and wage rise is less than 0.1%. Other data explains wage rise better.

  • @CIUproduction
    @CIUproduction 11 років тому

    CoooooooLLLLL VIDS!!!!

  • @mwansamulengalastone6472
    @mwansamulengalastone6472 10 років тому

    Nice one thats the inverse relationship ha, cool thanks

  • @Agorismohoje
    @Agorismohoje 3 роки тому +1

    NICE

  • @SanRemoMotelBar
    @SanRemoMotelBar 7 років тому

    What about the natural rate? It should intercept the X axis.

  • @libertysprings2244
    @libertysprings2244 4 роки тому

    Late 90s had super low oil prices and more cheap labor from China, both causing low inflation. In my view the Phillips curve only applies for products made within the country considered. For example, low unemployment in the healthcare industry has been causing health care costs to increase. Same for college education (high demand, low supply). Foreign-made products that use foreign labor (where unemployment is high and wages $1 per hour) will experience low inflation when imported to the u.s. and confuse the u.s. economists at the fed. Only when the dollar falls and/or oil prices rise, will we have more widespread inflation in the u.s.. Luckily for now, fracking oil locally has saved us from oil price inflation.

  • @ftorresgamez
    @ftorresgamez 12 років тому

    @RyogaShark,
    "Higher employment is what causes Wages to rise."
    No, it's higher demand for labor, not higher employment. You can still have raising wages with high unemployment, especially under artificial wage floors.

  • @williamjpiano
    @williamjpiano 12 років тому +2

    @Elmgren76 so true...

  • @karfar8029
    @karfar8029 2 роки тому +1

    Economists have been trying their hardest to hit 2% inflation for decades. They have recently admitted to not having a working model to explain inflation. Economics is the antithesis to a science. It is a faith. What you are claiming is that the solution to inflation is to increase the price of banking (increase the interest rate) whereby increasing the cost of all goods and services and to increase unemployment. How exactly is increasing prices and unemployment going to fix inflation? Doesn't increasing prices and destitution increase prices... i.e. stagflation? What Volker did actually made it worse, it did not solve the issue. If one wants to solve inflation, one would have to address the actual cause of the inflation. Most often, in America, it's petroleum. The true cause of our current inflation problems is both petroleum shortages and disruptions in global and local shipment lines. (2022) One can easily blame Biden and one Mr Pete Buttigieg. Our problem is an over reliance on a single commodity and a globalized exchange market that is particularly susceptible to disruptions.

  • @rupasuhag8536
    @rupasuhag8536 3 роки тому

    is this topic is of 11th class eco ??
    if is then tell in which ch ??

  • @futgeek3272
    @futgeek3272 4 роки тому

    Good yet incomplete video

  • @alyssazapanta799
    @alyssazapanta799 2 роки тому

    Some segments in the video are stamped not adjacent to each other

  • @alexstacyward977
    @alexstacyward977 11 років тому

    someone explain the snapping back concept please

  • @qwnuuri
    @qwnuuri 11 років тому

    somebody know which program he use?

  • @mrmsmartin527
    @mrmsmartin527 8 місяців тому

    Wait.. are you saying... If things are less expensive people don't have to work as much and when they are more expensive people work more... SHOCKING

  • @Confederalist
    @Confederalist 12 років тому

    Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. -Milton Friedman

  • @socctty
    @socctty 12 років тому

    Because demand has to increase in response to the rise in the monetary base. Paul Krugman is probably the guy to read on Japan's lost decade.

  • @fatboyj182
    @fatboyj182 12 років тому

    we should make this guy president

  • @omgiheartpie
    @omgiheartpie 12 років тому

    If expansions in the money supply (inflation) inevitably cause price increases, then why has the central bank of Japan's trillion+ injection into the financial system not caused run-away price increases? In fact, deflation and anemic inflation have remained persistent and this has plagued Japan's economy for over 2 decades.

  • @luisgentil
    @luisgentil 11 років тому

    I don't think you should have ended this lesson by simply stating that the Phillips Curve "could be generally true". If that were true there would not be a second version of the curve which is the one generally accepted nowadays. The modified version of the curve takes into account inflation expectations of the economic agents and a "natural" rate of unemployment. In short, the agents realize what's going on and the effect eventually fades away, bringing unemployment back to the natural rate.

  • @anthonydemetriou9335
    @anthonydemetriou9335 8 років тому

    Hold tight roadman

  • @eddysadvanture6334
    @eddysadvanture6334 3 роки тому

    USYD ECOS 2002 **

  • @NotBen101
    @NotBen101 11 років тому

    Once the federal reserve raises interest rates or the government has to pay its debts the economy will just go back into recession

  • @user-kb6lg1jt4d
    @user-kb6lg1jt4d 4 роки тому

    Indonesian subtitle please...

  • @schrodingerscat3912
    @schrodingerscat3912 7 років тому +11

    the dismal science

  • @mousumichakraborty8394
    @mousumichakraborty8394 6 років тому

    I have huge confusion about this... I think there is inverse relationship between money wage and unemployment or inverse relationship between money supply and unemployment.

  • @bobmartin8501
    @bobmartin8501 5 років тому

    The year is now 2018 this theory is turning out to be JUNK SCIENCE>

  • @ecnerwal999
    @ecnerwal999 12 років тому

    WRONG! Wages can't rise without can expansion of the money supply. Wages(the price of labor), like any other price, cannot rise because it is constrained by the amount of money that exists. Inflation just lowers real wages, as nominal wages stay the same with higher prices, and therefore it is the low wages that create higher employment.

  • @agzapiola
    @agzapiola 4 роки тому

    I find it quite disturbing that this guy's voice is SO SIMILAR to Anthony Bourdain's... (RIP)

  • @MyMrwrestling
    @MyMrwrestling 11 років тому

    wat do the feds do with printing money! buy bonds hope banks lend?
    has it happened ? no - has inflation gone up ? no
    in theory it should raise inflation but its not happened

  • @MyMrwrestling
    @MyMrwrestling 11 років тому

    whats wrong with that ? it has not caused inflation here in uk - printing money has little impact on inflation
    its a media overeaction

  • @alisimsek4818
    @alisimsek4818 2 роки тому

    Guys, If demand increases won't the price fall?

    • @MaSa-bp5qe
      @MaSa-bp5qe 2 роки тому

      No, the exact opposite. The higher the demand the higher the price. The lower the demand the lower the price.

  • @ecnerwal999
    @ecnerwal999 12 років тому

    @RyogaShark You don't understand basic economics. I recommend you learn from the best; Mises.org

  • @jakepelter4045
    @jakepelter4045 11 років тому

    I'm not thinking you watched the video.

  • @Elmgren76
    @Elmgren76 11 років тому

    printing money IS inflation. I really hope you were being sarcastic.

  • @DJAnthonyillWill
    @DJAnthonyillWill 12 років тому +1

    Khan. You might be a RON PAUL guy lol.

  • @BarackBrobama
    @BarackBrobama 12 років тому

    @Elmgreen76 pray tell

  • @CompUnit
    @CompUnit 3 місяці тому

    I don’t understand

  • @nkosinathitchavango5473
    @nkosinathitchavango5473 10 років тому

    TOO INSIGHTFUL

  • @jamiechan3666
    @jamiechan3666 11 років тому +1

    :D

  • @SA-sj6hr
    @SA-sj6hr 2 роки тому +1

    hhhh

  • @jayjaymcfly7475
    @jayjaymcfly7475 Місяць тому

    Unfortunately, this nice theory fell apart in the great stagflation. Sorry. But the theory is wrong.