Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Low ownership cost airplane good for many things | Custom upgraded Cessna 177 review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 чер 2024
  • In this video we discuss details of the multiple uses of this Cessna 177. This is a great example of custom upgrades to an airplane to bring quality, comfort and performance like a newer airplane.
    This airplane is for sale. If you are interested please contact the company directly.
    Link: www.aerolifeav...
    Original 177 was designed to replace the Cessna 172. Cessna changed the idea because 172 was so popular. Also, the original 177 was somewhat underpowered. A few upgrades in this airplane can make a significant difference and make a very good airplane for many things.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 89

  • @aviationphd
    @aviationphd Місяць тому +4

    My time in 177s goes back to the early 80s and have always loved them. They are great all around airplanes. Probably the easiest airplane to get into and out of.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      They definitely are one of the easiest entry planes I’ve ever found. You’re lucky to have been able to fly one. Thanks for watching & your comment.

    • @thecanadianavee8r660
      @thecanadianavee8r660 15 днів тому

      Those cadillac doors sure do make the mooney pilots jealous. Until they fly by like were standing still that is

  • @fabiofonseca2001
    @fabiofonseca2001 Місяць тому +4

    I'm so glad to see you again, greetings from Brazil

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      Thank you for continuing to watch our videos in Brazil. Appreciate the comments too.

    • @fabiofonseca2001
      @fabiofonseca2001 Місяць тому

      @@aerolife1646 your explanation is the best, and your voice clear help so much to understand. Tks

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 Місяць тому +3

    Great to see you again in this beautiful 177 And I’m blessed to be flying in one

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      Thank you, they are a great plane to fly. Once you’ve flown one you definitely want to keep flying them. Appreciate the comment.

  • @pchansen100
    @pchansen100 Місяць тому +2

    That’s going to make someone a very happy owner! Well done. I love the paint and interior. 👍

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      Thank you, we spent a lot of time designing the paint and interior, glad you like them. They really change how a plane looks when done right. Appreciate you watching and the comment.

  • @Steve757-fl1hd
    @Steve757-fl1hd Місяць тому +1

    Man, I loved the Cessna Cardinal C-177 FG. I actually rented a C-177 RG for several years. Use to fly from SIU in Carbondale, Illinois up to Dupage County Airport to see family.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      Both the fixed gear and retractable gear Cardinals are great planes to fly. You are lucky to have had a chance to rent one. Thanks for commenting and watching our video.

  • @guillermoolivera7086
    @guillermoolivera7086 Місяць тому +1

    I did my IFR training course in a Cardinal and my commercial checkride. Great memories, nice airplane !

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      They are great airplanes, you were lucky to be able to do some advanced training in the Cardinal. They’re great for that with their easy, smooth handling characteristics.
      Thanks for watching and the comment.

  • @keitha.9788
    @keitha.9788 Місяць тому +2

    I had a 1973 Cardinal (177B) for about 25 years. It was a great airplane ....

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      The B models are also great planes. You were lucky to be able to own one. Thanks for watching and commenting.

  • @Cousin.
    @Cousin. Місяць тому +2

    Another excellent video Megan. Thanks guys!

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      Thank you, appreciate you continuing to watch and comment on our videos.

  • @davidgarcia2491
    @davidgarcia2491 5 днів тому

    That is one beautiful aircraft. Wow...

  • @michaelb.8953
    @michaelb.8953 Місяць тому +1

    That tail number keeps reading to me as "too old", but what a beautiful plane as I open up a tab for trade a plane taking a look at the 177 as a possibility.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      The 177 is a great option for many different purposes. We have this plane for sale, if you’re interested the link is in the description.
      Some tail numbers are definitely interesting.
      Thanks for watching and commenting.

  • @gendaminoru3195
    @gendaminoru3195 Місяць тому

    BIRD, but now that I'mover being stunned, please put a white stripe on the propeller tips - just in case ramp people are nearby when running. Understand the wing is the same same laminar flow wing as the C-210 which has a nice strong carry through spar, but with wider cabin.. I know people IO-360 in 177RGs having C/S props, and even one friend has an IO-390 in his. Cruises at 180 kts in that TN bird. 177 may be the best thing Cessna ever built save the 441. Lot's of options to do upgrades on this platform. But I think I saw you doing other C-177 videos, so you know all this already eh? Best thing about the G-5 is that it is an AHRS system. Nice colors on your outfit for the vid. :)

  • @iPilotFlorida
    @iPilotFlorida Місяць тому +2

    So want to have this one....Thank you for showing....:O

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      You are welcome, thank you for taking time to watch and comment.

  • @anthonycyr9657
    @anthonycyr9657 25 днів тому

    The cardinal is so dam gorgeous.

  • @boogerwood
    @boogerwood Місяць тому +1

    Hey! You're back! Stumbled on your channel when I was researching Cardinals. Ultimately didn't buy one. Too forward of a CG for 2 big guys trying to fly. But definitely a plane I wish I could! 210 maybe?

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      If the CG is too far forward in a plane (even 182 and 210 can have this), it can be solved simply by using baggage or ballast in the back of the baggage area to balance out. Since the baggage compartment has a longer arm it doesn’t need to be a lot of weight to balance out the CG. Thanks for watching our videos and commenting.

  • @MargaretLeber
    @MargaretLeber Місяць тому +3

    Cardinals rock.We don't allow primary training in ours, though. I think claiming 800+ miles range is an exaggeration. Practically it's much less.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +2

      Thank you for watching and the comment. 825 miles is the range listed in the pilots operating handbook of this plane. You may be referring to the 177B model, but this particular plane having more power, lower fuel burn and the digital engine monitor to precisely monitor fuel flow can go long distance. It just flew 500 miles with plenty of fuel left. I’ve flown from Northern Indiana to Central Florida.
      I agree that flight schools don’t use them as primary trainers, for different reasons including being more expensive than the same year range 172 and not as common as 172 or Piper Cherokee and most Cardinals are the B model with a constant speed prop which is not the best for initial training. This particular Cardinal is similar to a 172 but handles better with a roomier and comfortable cabin.
      If you watch my RV12 video, that is a very good plane to use as a primary trainer. When I was training a while back, my instructor told me the Cardinal was his new favorite plane because of how it handles.

    • @MargaretLeber
      @MargaretLeber Місяць тому

      @@aerolife1646 Oh, I suspect the reason for the primary training prohibition is to spare the airplane; we're a joint-ownership flying club. Yes, ours is a -B: thus constant speed prop and 180hp engine. Yours is quite pretty, love the paint. A re-engined -A must be interesting.

    • @terrancestodolka4829
      @terrancestodolka4829 Місяць тому

      My Kidneys don't reach that distance...

    • @nojabformeeducateyourself3393
      @nojabformeeducateyourself3393 Місяць тому

      Another beautiful bird. Nice to see you again Megan.

  • @Michael-iw3ek
    @Michael-iw3ek Місяць тому +2

    Wow what a cool little bird.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      Thank you, appreciate you watching and the comment.

  • @wescrackatinny
    @wescrackatinny Місяць тому

    I can only dream of owning an aircraft however, if I was lucky enough, it would be a cardinal. Thank you for a great review

    • @jdwilk5023
      @jdwilk5023 Місяць тому

      First buy a cheap 150 and then upgrade over time.

  • @fridge7515
    @fridge7515 Місяць тому +2

    Dream plane right there! Hoping y’all have another like it one day when we’re ready to buy. Cardinal looks so roomy compared to the 172

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      They are the most roomy in this category. We get a limited number of aircraft to maintain the high quality. If we have something you like in the future when you're ready please feel free to contact us, we enjoy helping people find the right plane for them. Thank you for watching.

    • @fridge7515
      @fridge7515 Місяць тому +1

      @@aerolife1646 1000% , I’m newerish ppl. Your videos have been super informative and all your pros on the Cardinal size, fuel burn, etc I think would fit our family flying. Will definitely be looking when it’s time to buy and hopefully get some transition training also. So far I’ve only had 172 and Cherokee 235 experience and the whole one door thing freaks me out

    • @cessna177flyer3
      @cessna177flyer3 Місяць тому +1

      @@fridge7515 Having two doors is not only safer, but MUCH more convenient.

    • @fridge7515
      @fridge7515 Місяць тому +1

      @@cessna177flyer3 amen to that! I ain’t no thunderbird lol. Ease, comfort and safety in all about. Love your videos by the way, one day I will own a Cardinal.

  • @Firefox131
    @Firefox131 Місяць тому +5

    I still believe Cessna made a mistake. They should have ended the 172 line and kept the 177. Much easier and stable aircraft all the way around.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +3

      They definitely are a more stable plane and should have been continued. I think the combination of the initial lower powered engine and lack of slots in the stabilator (which made landing harder) made for some ‘bad press’ and Cessna either couldn’t or wouldn’t try to overcome that which resulted in them dropping the Cardinal from production. Although I think the 172 will always be seen as a good primary trainer. Thanks for commenting and watching our video.

    • @cessna177flyer3
      @cessna177flyer3 Місяць тому +1

      The Cardinal has a lot of hand-made parts (like the doors) which made it more expensive to produce than its competitors. Then, rising labor costs in the 60s and 70s put further pressure on products like the Cardinal, leaving Cessna no choice but to discontinue it. But I agree, it is a superior airplane compared to the C-172 in almost every way.

    • @thecanadianavee8r660
      @thecanadianavee8r660 16 днів тому +1

      I'm a cardinal owner and will die on the hill that the cardinal is a far better aircraft but i'm also an aircraft mechanic. I've seen multiple companies over the years upgrade to cardinals for various tasks such as training and pipeline patrol and at the end of the day the 172 is a simpler, more robust aircraft. Between the fixed stabilizer, corrugated control surfaces, strut braced wing, and much more robust nose gear and forward fuselage, the 172 can take heavier beatings from heavy low level turbulence during pipeline operations, and hard landings and overstress from students honing their skills. I work on flight school 172s with over 25000hrs that are as good as new. The cardinal is a better plane but the 172 will always have its place as the rugged, reliable beater.

  • @mrwest5552
    @mrwest5552 Місяць тому +1

    very nice review, Thank You.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      Thank you for watching and the comment.

  • @tnmonty501
    @tnmonty501 Місяць тому +1

    Beautiful aircraft

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      Thank you for the comment and watching our video.

  • @williamkennedy2069
    @williamkennedy2069 Місяць тому +2

    I love the video, love the plane too. You said something about the cylinders gave you an additional 10 horsepower, what specifically is it that gives you the 10 extra horsepower, what should I say how does it give it to you?

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +2

      It is a RAM STC - I’d have to look at the STC for specifics but it can be done by increasing the displacement or changing the compression ratio. An O360 and IO360 have the same displacement but produce different horsepower. Thank you for watching and the comment.

    • @williamkennedy2069
      @williamkennedy2069 Місяць тому +1

      @@aerolife1646 80 compression does make more sense, the io 360s injected, and thus more horsepower, maybe the ram STC gives it more compression

  • @prestonmiller9552
    @prestonmiller9552 Місяць тому +1

    I have flown the Cardinal many times and many bash it because they had trouble landing it. But it takes a bit more finesse and once you master that it is as easy to fly as any 172. Performances is a bit better than the 172.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      Thank you for the comment. Different planes need different landing techniques and training. If learned correctly in any plane, you can fly and land them very nicely. That’s why we offer transition training, so people can learn correctly. My daughter is a student pilot and I’ve trained her in a Cardinal. She never once had to go around and lands better than many pilots. Many people try to land the Cardinal like other Cessnas such as the 172. That is completely incorrect since this plane has a large, stabilator as opposed to the small elevator most other planes have.

  • @skyepilotte11
    @skyepilotte11 Місяць тому +1

    This is one gorgeous Cardinal...thx

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      Thank you very much for the comment and watching our video.

  • @FlyingNDriving
    @FlyingNDriving Місяць тому +1

    I like the paint but i think the black looks out of place. N-number in Red with gold border would be nicer imo. That interior is very classy and tasteful tho, well done

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      Thank you for the comment. The reason we used black accents is to keep the red from becoming too bright red. It also gives a sharp contrast. We’ll give some thought to this though and maybe try a more charcoal dark gray color next time to see how it looks in the design.

  • @ohwell2790
    @ohwell2790 Місяць тому +1

    The important thing is. Has the center section spar inspection been done.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      Very true, the spar inspection is important in Cardinals. This plane has had that inspection done and passed with flying colors! Thanks for the comment and for watching our video.

  • @rickunruh8132
    @rickunruh8132 Місяць тому +2

    The 177 looks better than a 172 no matter what the paint job is.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      The 177s are beautiful planes without the strut there. Thanks for the comment & watching.

  • @tudaituda
    @tudaituda Місяць тому +1

    Great Bird!

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +2

      Thanks, they are great planes to start with, and the upgrades have made it even better. Appreciate the comment and you watching the our video.

  • @anthonycyr9657
    @anthonycyr9657 25 днів тому

    Would be perfect with the io390 LYC.

  • @nonDescriptAviation
    @nonDescriptAviation Місяць тому +1

    Any info on useful load with this bird's STC?

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      Usefull load if this plane is 900 lbs. It is actually higher than the 1975 177B model we sold recently.

  • @luckythirteen77
    @luckythirteen77 Місяць тому +1

    would something like this be bush capable with appropriate tires no pants?

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +2

      It can definitely be used on grass strips. I just don’t know of anyone using a Cardinal as a bush plane. Thanks for watching

  • @matiasmerono
    @matiasmerono Місяць тому +1

    The beauty of the cardinal is not in question, is the only highwing piston to me.
    But dón't use yourself as a reference in interior matters, because I try to find you in the German Olimpic Handball Team and I couldn't find you.
    🤨

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      I definitely agree, they are beautiful planes.
      These planes are designed in USA to accommodate the height of average US people. As an example, the Mooney has a smaller cabin than the Cardinal; a couple weeks ago a gentleman well over 6ft sat down and fit nicely even in that plane. This plane will definitely fit. The seats can move forward and aft quite a bit and the left seat can also lift up and down. The Cessna 177 has a similar space to a Cessna 210. If someone can’t fit well in this plane they won’t fit well in other planes either. The only thing is that four large people would exceed the payload and rear seat leg room in many single pistons. I do like the way you put the question though and thank you for watching.

  • @SaisWorld-USA
    @SaisWorld-USA Місяць тому

    Kindly suggest the painting company and contact numbers pls 🙏🙏🙏

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 Місяць тому

    The Powerflow exhaust system makes a lot more horsepower

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      In their website, for the 177 upgrade, Powerflow mentions that the upgrade is equal to 10-15 horsepower. It doesn’t actually add HP to the engine since it’s an exhaust system. It gives increased performance similar to what increased HP would. Thanks for continuing to watch our videos.

  • @ConvairDart106
    @ConvairDart106 Місяць тому

    Wait a minute. You upgraded it to 160hp? Sorry, I will stick with the Archer in that case.

  • @aeromatt
    @aeromatt Місяць тому +1

    Great deal compared to a clapped out 172.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      Thanks for watching and the comment. It is definitely a good alternative to a 172 for a lot of people.

  • @alancohen5688
    @alancohen5688 Місяць тому

    I'm not getting any sound on this video

  • @cmtetaboaco
    @cmtetaboaco Місяць тому

    Why people don’t like the C177?

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      Many people own them, fly them and love them. Cardinal has its own association as well because of its popularity. You can find people who dislike any airplane for their own, various reasons.

  • @alancohen5688
    @alancohen5688 Місяць тому

    I've got sound on other videos but not this one.

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +1

      The video was still processing. I just checked and the sound is working fine now. Please check it again. Thanks

    • @alancohen5688
      @alancohen5688 Місяць тому +2

      I had to close it and reopen it after the audio was processed and it played just fine. I enjoyed the content. Thank you.

    • @alancohen5688
      @alancohen5688 Місяць тому +2

      Beautiful bird too!

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому +2

      @@alancohen5688 thank your for the update

  • @navinstrument8353
    @navinstrument8353 Місяць тому +1

    That is so roomy

    • @aerolife1646
      @aerolife1646  Місяць тому

      The Cardinals are one of the widest cabins in the piston singles. Thanks for the comment and watching our video.

  • @project.jericho
    @project.jericho Місяць тому +1

    It's meh. That paint is awful, but most don't really care so it likely won't be an issue.