German Submarine Warfare in World War 1 I THE GREAT WAR Special
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
- Find out more about War2Glory: bit.ly/TheGreat...
Paul Hodos' Book about U-Kreuzer: amzn.to/2JzXkIY
Submarines played a vital part in Germany's WW1 strategy. They would disrupt allied shipping despite the British Naval Blockade and ensue fear across the Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea.
» HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR CHANNEL?
You can support us by sharing our videos with your friends and spreading the word about our work.You can also support us financially on Patreon: / thegreatwar
You can also buy our merchandise in our online shop: shop.spreadshir...
Patreon is a platform for creators like us, that enables us to get monthly financial support from the community in exchange for cool perks.
» WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WORLD WAR I AND WHERE ELSE CAN I FIND YOU?
We’re offering background knowledge, news, a glimpse behind the scenes and much more on:
reddit: bit.ly/TheGreat...
Facebook: bit.ly/WW1FB
Twitter: bit.ly/WW1Series
Instagram: bit.ly/ZpMYPL
» CAN I EMBED YOUR VIDEOS ON MY WEBSITE?
Of course, you can embed our videos on your website. We are happy if you show our channel to your friends, fellow students, classmates, professors, teachers or neighbours. Or just share our videos on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc.
We are also happy to get your feedback, criticism or ideas in the comments. If you have interesting historical questions, just post them and we will answer in our OUT OF THE TRENCHES videos. You can find a selection of answers to the most frequently asked questions here: bit.ly/OOtrenches
» CAN I SHOW YOUR VIDEOS IN CLASS?
Of course! Tell your teachers or professors about our channel and our videos. We’re happy if we can contribute with our videos. If you are a teacher and have questions about our show, you can get in contact with us on one of our social media presences.
» WHAT ARE YOUR SOURCES?
Videos: British Pathé
Pictures: Mostly Picture Alliance
Background Map: d-maps.com/cart...
Literature (excerpt):
Gilbert, Martin. The First World War. A Complete History, Holt Paperbacks, 2004.
Hart, Peter. The Great War. A Combat History of the First World War, Oxford University Press, 2013.
Hart, Peter. The Great War. 1914-1918, Profile Books, 2013.
Stone, Norman. World War One. A Short History, Penguin, 2008.
Keegan, John. The First World War, Vintage, 2000.
Hastings, Max. Catastrophe 1914. Europe Goes To War, Knopf, 2013.
Hirschfeld, Gerhard. Enzyklopädie Erster Weltkrieg, Schöningh Paderborn, 2004
Michalka, Wolfgang. Der Erste Weltkrieg. Wirkung, Wahrnehmung, Analyse, Seehamer Verlag GmbH, 2000
Leonhard, Jörn. Die Büchse der Pandora: Geschichte des Ersten Weltkrieges, C.H. Beck, 2014
If you want to buy some of the books we use or recommend during our show, check out our Amazon Store: bit.ly/AmazonTGW
NOTE: This store uses affiliate links which grant us a commission if you buy a product there.
» WHAT IS “THE GREAT WAR” PROJECT?
THE GREAT WAR covers the events exactly 100 years ago: The story of World War I in realtime. Featuring: The unique archive material of British Pathé. Indy Neidell takes you on a journey into the past to show you what really happened and how it all could spiral into more than four years of dire war. Subscribe to our channel and don’t miss our new episodes every Thursday.
» WHO IS REPLYING TO MY COMMENTS? AND WHO IS BEHIND THIS PROJECT?
Most of the comments are written by our social media manager Florian. He is posting links, facts and backstage material on our social media channels. But from time to time, Indy reads and answers comments with his personal account, too.
The Team responsible for THE GREAT WAR is even bigger:
- CREDITS -
Presented by : Indiana Neidell
Written by: Indiana Neidell
Director: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
Director of Photography: Toni Steller
Sound: Toni Steller
Mixing, Mastering & Sound Design: www.above-zero.com
Editing: Toni Steller, Julian Zahn
Motion Design: Christian Graef
Research by: Indiana Neidell
Fact checking: Markus Linke
The Great War Theme composed by Karim Theilgaard: bit.ly/karimyt
A Mediakraft Networks Original Channel
Based on a concept by Spartacus Olsson
Author: Indiana Neidell
Visual Concept: David van Stephold
Producer: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
Social Media Manager: Florian Wittig
Contains licenced Material by British Pathé
All rights reserved - © Mediakraft Networks GmbH, 2018
Nothing could've been scarier than being in a WW1 submarine
being in a WW1 submarine submerged thousands of feet underwater and there's water trickling down the wall next to your bunk.
@@hobomike6935silly
You know about 5000 officers and sailors is not alot when compared to the big land battles like the Somme, Verdun or the battles of Ypres but I guess its their training that made them valuable. The submarines they served in were also extremely valuable.
right these were highly trained engineers not just cannon fodder
I'd be curious to see what those casualties are as a percentage of those in the service. In other words, were you statistically more likely to die as a submariner or as an infantryman during the war?
The losses of navies as a whole in modern wars typically is very low compared to the army and airforce, respectively. You can look at all belligerents in both world wars and their casualties.
BountyFlamor off the top of my head, the Uboot branch in wwII lost something like 3/4 of it's personnel
Yes, but there are often far more infantrymen than sailors, and far more sailors than submariners, so of course the total number would be higher. I'm talking about number killed as a percentage of personnel in that profession.
Watched every Great War episode to date, great show! Thanks Indie and the team!
My great great Uncle was one of them and I am proud of him. He didn't survive and lies at the bottom of the Nort Sea east of the Orkneys.
thanking him for his service
U-Boat - U see the boat... U-Boat sees you. The outcome is obvious.
combain yeah, that U-boat is going down...
U-Boat: "You are already dead"
Destroyer: "No u"
U-Boat: "Nani?!"
Aslamnur Fikri That's a step too far on the wild side
Off the coast of Italy: Is that a U-Boat? No, that's not a my boat!
I will be sponsoring this channel, because the quality, effort put in, and knowledge gained from these videos are amazing!
Keep up the GREAT WARk!
2:42 side note: Merchant ships are still armed against piracy. Although mostly small arms rather than cannons.
A special on Karl donitz during the war could be interesting..
I second this
Super glad you touched on the merchant subs and kruisers. Cargo ships that could hide underwater, then later super powerful cruisers that could reach the Americas.
Always great to hear about this German submarines!
Yes! I was watching many documentary clips about German U-boats, and suddenly this pops up. Perfect timing!
Also, I'm early.
Brits and cracking German coding system. Name a better duo.
Rahell Omer - Native Americans and the Walkie Talkie
Poles and cracking German coding systems.
that's what i was going to say JokoCi
Rahell Omer the Wehrmacht and a drive through a forest (wrong war but it works)
Finns and the Säkkijärven polka
You forgot to put in commercial in the beginning
Hah, they forgot to edit in the trailer of the sponsor.
Merchant submarine is such an awesome concept. Great video as usual, TGW!
Ive been watching for 10 seconds and I can already tell this is gonna be a great channel lol
It is an awesome channel. Watch it from beginning to end.
I think if used properly, submarines can win the war for germany!
I think it might be to late...
i can't imagine any other outcome than a total german victory they have the greatest general Ludendorff
After Battle of Jutland, German focus was not a surface fleet. Unrestricted warfare re-instated after serious pause from bad USA press regarding RMS Lusitania. 2-edged sword. Effective U-boats = more supplies sunk = new pissed allies.
What Germany could learn from U-boat warfare when it comes to both World Wars:
- Don't let your leaders start the war unless you have as much submarines as your naval leadership says you absolutely have to have to strangle the UK
- The UK has cracked your code any any messages you send via wireless communication, is basically public knowledge
İn Soviet Russia lt is Us-boat
да!
*Soviet anthem earrape starts playing*
Get it? Cause socialism.
Really nice joke :D
Our boat lol
U-Boat 29 or The Spy in Black is a great WWI naval movie. Worth watching for Conrad Veidt's performance and some great scenes with the U-boat crew.
Who needs beached whales when you have beached U-boats
Also there's some misconseption among the peoples,who thinking Germany just used subs in WW1.İn fact German Naval High Command never interest to build subs before WW1 and even German Admiral Tirpitz saw subs as useless.Biggest naval weapon of Germany was their numerous dreadnoughts and battlecruisers when war breakout.İn the beginning Germans just had 28 active submarines and they built another 350 during the war.
Very interesting. Thanks.
I'm ashamed that I found this channel just now
John Apple Welcome to the front lad!
Please make a Video about the german 1WW „Pirate“-ship „Wolf“.
ClemasiusTV ,you beat me to it. I read about the SMS Wolf several years ago. It's a fascinating tale,and certainly deserves some remembering.
A interessting fact. The german u boats sunk almost the same enemy ship tonnage in ww2 as in ww1.
I am waiting for the 21st century hyped episodes titled "The Even Greater War", now with more Great!
Das Boot: Beta version
Gaslight Studios lol
Rather the prequel.
Maybe somebody here knows this: i read somewhere years ago that former miners were preferred as submarine personel because they had already prooved to be able to handle the psychological effects of beeing far underground. But while it seems logical, i wasn't able to find where i read it nor any other source supporting this.
That contemporary footage is riveting!
Thank you, Indy and crew, for another stellar episode. 👏👍🏽👌🏻
Yes literally riveting.
You guys ROCK, this is BY FAR the best WW1 channel, and likely will be for decades to come! I definitely hope you will do a WW2 show starting with September 1st 2019...
I have a question for you guys, why did Entente wait for so long to mount a serious attack on Salonika front?
All the best J V
"Into the boat ! Into the tunnel ! Get to the choppa !" :D :D :D
Great upload again, but 1 hint, an uboat uses its batteries underwater.
Great video 👏👏👏
it amazing to think there were submarines in ww1
I have a question for OOTT how much change was put in the U-boats from 1914 to say 1945 after watching the movie Das Boot I at times found things not surprising to here of the conditions I think it would be interesting to hear your opinions and some of the facts and your too sense on the subject
As soon as it’s about German submarine warfare I tend to forget which war we’re ‘in’.
I would love a “who did what in WW1” episode on general John Pershing, he was quite an interesting fellow.
Hey Indy and crew, I was wondering what proportion of men in the army actually served in front line combat?
I'd guess half or ⅗
"Worst possible living conditions for a sailor!?
Bah!
At least you wussies could stand up! ... and breathe air!"
- The crew of the CSS Hunley.
They found the Hunley not too long ago and raised it. The sub was actually preserved so well that the sailor's brains were still in their heads, even after 150 years.
so happy i found this channel! amazing content-and really well put together and well written show. thankyou!
What am I going to do this November when this series ends :( ?? I only just discovered it a few months ago, wish I had known sooner.
Indy we love your dedication to tht vest only u could pull it off my knowledgeable brother
the last time I was this early to a great war video the turtle was trying to sink British ships in american harbors.
John Meyer hahahaha
Hi Great War subscribers, Paul Hodos here, I helped with the research/writing on this episode. If you are interested in u-cruisers and their attacks within American, Canadian, and West African coastal Waters please see my book, The Kaiser's Lost Kreuzer, at these links: www.amazon.com/s?k=Kaiser%27s+Lost+Kreuzer&ref=is_s
McFarland: mcfarlandbooks.com/product/the-kaisers-lost-kreuzer/
Also in ebook format on Amazon or Barnes and Noble.
Thanks!
Was hoping sub v sub warfare would get addressed in here. Oh well, still a great video.
Very nice summary well done guys
Don't forget the Russians got a German code book and passed it to the British!
They are able to crack our communication you say? Oh NP, next time we will invent this perfect machine, that nobody will be able to decrypt! trillions of combinations, it will be a work of true art; giving us certain victory!!! We shall call it!! AN ENIGMA!
Why was the intro so loud but Indy so quiet?
1,000 likes now and not a single dislike? Wow!
Question for Out of the Trenches- What was the role of the Indian Army outside of the Palestine front? I haven't heard of them in regular episodes since Gallipoli and the seige at Kut. How were they distributed in different theatre and in how many numbers and how were they organized? What were their differences in equipment, clothing, weapons, artillery? How were they affected by the modern war? Any notable actions and names? Where in India were they from? So far only heard about the Gurkhas and Sikhs, were there soldiers from other parts of the Dominion?
Need more details, the special episode only covers this very lightly.
Happy Independence Day.
I thought you'd made a booboo when you said Justicia was under the White Star line's flag. The name ending in "IA" made me think "No, it must have been a Cunarder." Well, the answer turned out to be yes & no. The ship was built as the SS Statendam for the Holland America line, was taken over by the admiralty and assigned to Cunard, hence the "IA". Apparently Cunard couldn't scrape a crew together, so the ship was re-assigned to White Star, who had the sunken Britannic's crew spare. For some reason she wasn't renamed a second time.
ant4812 Well spotted.
I have often wondered what might have happened had the Germans coordinated the U-boat fleet with the Surface fleet in the battle of Jutland. Had they placed a large number of U-boats in an area they could lure the British into while keeping the German fleet out of it the combined effort could have been devastating. Yes, I am aware of the limitations of the U-boat during WW1 and the radio was going to be an issue but with proper planing it was possible. They could have even stationed them to wait for the Grand Fleet to return to Scapa Flow. Killing the convoys required killing the escorts and they never figured that out in either war due to their tunnel-vision focus of sinking tonnage. A Distorter can not drop depth charges if it has been sunk.
Donald Hill In order to win, they actually had do defeat Royal Navy, either with surface ships or with subs, and do destroy convoys in order to deprive Britain from building new ships...
That is what I am saying. Attacking the cargo ships before attacking the escorts was a huge mistake for the single attacks and not forming a strategy to reduce the Royal Navies ability to provide escorts was a war loser in both Wars. This was part of my point in adding them to the battle plan for Jutland as a combined effort with the High Seas Fleet. Yes, the Uboats were slower then the Surface ships but they figured out where to expect both the Escorts and Convoy ships so it was possible for them to use the Wolf pack methods they employed on the cargo ships instead on the escorts especially in the WW1 when anti-sub tech was still new. The US basically did the same thing as the U-boats in WW2 against the Japanese but our Subs went after all targets not just Cargo ships. Yes, the Tech was better and the Japanese never really used convoys properly but it showed it could be done.
Well, that was the plan but, it included Zeppelin reconnaissance and the weather never allowed for their employment so, since the already deployed Uboats were running out of fuel, the bombardment of Sudnerland (the bait) was cancelled and the operation replaced by a cruise off Denmark just to keep the crews active...
Some Uboats detected the GF and reported it, but radio was still new back then and the message es didnt get through, a couple boats even managed to launch a torpedo or two against returning RN ships, but there were no hits.
In Agugust the Germans would try again, this time the Uboats did score and sunk two cruisers, after that the GF had enough and went home, the losses convinced them not to leave port unless the HSF steamed all the way to Scotland in order to avoid the Uboats.
big problems with the comparison of Germany vs British and US vs Japan. First Japan did not use convoys.
Second US had many more subs than the Germans in WW2.
Third Subs carried very few torpedoes so using them to take out surface warships would leave you nothing to take out merchant ships.
Fourth Japan tried to use subs with an enemy warships first approach. It failed badly.
Fifth In over 4 years of war less then 200 Uboats were taken out. Escorts were not that effective at killing Uboats so why waste time and ammo?
Sixth in order to work with a friendly surface fleet UBoats had to either surface, or use radios (or both). Even if the British didn't crack German codes this would give away at least where the Uboats were.
I would accept that argument except that at the time of the US Entry into WW2 , it had a fraction of the German Strength and a dud Torpedo that was not fixed for another year and a half married with a command core which was unwilling to be aggressive (due to pre-war training) which balances out German Uboat shortages. US sub success had a lot to do with the willingness of the senior command to clean house of the older Captains and put younger more aggressive Captains in their place. Japan did use a sort of convoy system but did not provide acquitted close escorts which allowed single US Subs to eliminate the entire convoy and often the escort once they arrived were also sunk. Yes, they went home with empty Torpedo rooms many times. By the time they might have thought of using a proper convoy system the IJN was on the run. Japan which had arguably one of the best Torpedoes of the war, as a rule did not target merchants or supply ships because they did not see them as worthy. So when they came across war ships, they were often in fleet or squadron groups with sonar. Admittedly, once the US was in WW2 the UK's anti-sub warfare tactics had reached the point that any change in Uboat tactics would most likely have failed. In WW2 the potential of the Uboats had also passed by the time the US entered the war with the US and UK fleets standing virtually untouched by the Uboats in the Atlantic. In both wars they had a 2 years window at best to win and failed both times because they did not target war ships aggressively which where much harder to build then the merchant ships they did target.
Very interessting. Now it makes a lot of sense that Karl Dönitz relied on regular communication with the u-boats although it has been criticized again by "historians".
To all Allies' cheerleaders out there, read this and have a nice Monday:
"I have already given my opinion on the question of the submarine warfare; I am quite positive first, that Germany had unquestionably every right to carry out an unrestricted U-boat warfare, and secondly, that it was our duty to employ every weapon we possessed to achieve the final victory. It was England who had begun the extension of the War to women, children and non-combatants by the blockade measures she had taken. There can be no doubt we had the right to defend ourselves with similar measures. The outbreak of American indignation against Germany for preventing Americans from coming to England or going in safety anywhere else they desired sounds almost childish. With the same right the Americans might demand that a battle should be broken off, and the artillery fire stopped when a few Americans took it into their heads to go for a walk on that particular battle-field." (Max Hoffmann, 'The War Of Lost Opportunities' (1923))
"allied cheerleaders".
If you didn't have a smug grin while typing this you're either using a bad translator program or a troll.
"ooh we're so oppressed without trade totes fair to exploderise your people with our big strong sub weapons on civilian vessels that are so large and lacking in weaponry that to mistake them for anything else is tantamount to mistaking the Eiffel tower for a radio antenna."
Cos taking on military vessels is for chumps isn't it? Such brave folk were the submariners. Heavens forbid you actually take out the enemy military strengths instead of just endlessly harassing civilians like ISIS does nowadays, or any other terror group you care to mention.
A small difference with artillery bombardments is that they're usually used to target enemy formations of soldiers and not civilian centres, unlike your blessed sub heroes who put passenger ships into their crosshairs without a single military vessel in sight.
But go on, keep quoting apologists to your hearts content mate.
How can we still, after 100 years, be fighting about who was more cruel, who broke more rules and who´s fault it was to start this war in the first place? All fun and memes aside i am still shocked sometimes how stupid the community of this channel can be sometimes.
Can´t you see that it simply doesn´t matter if Germany had the right to unrestricted submarine warfare or if the naval blockade was righteous?
This war was a tragedy for people in every country and it has never happened before or afterwards that so many lifes have been lost so needlesly. Nobody was right, but everybody suffered.
Hahahahaha. Mate, your attempt at making the sub soldiers worse is just pathetic.
Also, anything publicly said by German generals during and after the war should be taken with a huge truckload of salt. It's usually self-serving propaganda, petty infighting, right-wing attacks on democracy, blaming someone else, or a combination of all four. What it's definitely not: an honest attempt at analysing the war.
Paraphrased in short: "Im Krieg und in der Liebe ist alles erlaubt."
Can’t wait for GreatWar2: Electric Boogaloo
sir arthur conan-doylw wrote a story titled "danger!" about a fictional version of germany, called norland, that blockades the channel with submarine. according to a biography of conan-doyle, written by daniel stashower, the german admiralty tried to lower british morale by saying that they viewed conan-doyles story as strategically valuable. in spite of that insult, he wrote a story titled "the death voyage" in which kaiser wilhelm died in a sea battle rather than abdicate, giving him an honorable death. you can read both stories online.
Propz for the props! Is that a Gurka Knife? Nice :D
Hey Flo! Any chance of a special trip to a submarine museum? On that note, is there a WW1 submarine museum somewhere to visit?
Why no mention of the seminal event that showed the world the terrifying power of the U-boat, the Lusitania sinking?
I think if the Germans keep going like this, they might lose. They do not have any manpower pools or trained reserves. Ukraine cannot change the tide. I wonder what will happen to the Kaiser after this...
I hear the Netherlands is nice this time of year.
Don't you worry, they will be back, stronger than ever
Rumors say they have a secret weapon.
Germany can't lose man, I bet several hundred dollars in Papiermarks that they'd win the war
NotJustinY. At this point Austria Hungary will have to bring troops............
Please tell me more about that German merchant sub. I've never heard of a merchant submarine before - what did it carry?
Joshua Evans-Lowell Things like tin, nickel and rubber. The Deutschland only made two trips to the US and the Hamburg was sunk on it's first,but some say the latter carried enough money to start a submarine trading company in the US
Deck guns were preferable because their shells were more plentiful and cheaper compared to torpedoes and submarine could carry dozens of shells. Early submarines carried only a small number of torpedoes (maybe 6?) so used torpedoes sparingly and preferred to use the deck gun where possible.
did the germans used one time pads for encryption?
So disappointed you are missing the most important facts such as before the convoy system merchant ships were sailing unescorted and no reference to Admiral Sims' The Victory at sea which is a primary source. So I have done it for you on UA-cam: War @ Sea 1914-1918 parts one - twelve. You inspired me!
phew! You guys didn't do a Saturday video and I was worried you ran out of funding!
You could do a video on Austrian sub ace Georg Von Trapp.
Fascinating episode. I love u boats
1,1 thousand likes and 0 dislikes. O.o (Great work)
I wonder if Germany will use Subs again
Indiana Jones
Your thumbnail is Roger Moore in... which movie was that?
Charles Goodwin The Wild Geese... it was made in 1978 with Roger Moore, Richard Burton, Richard Harris, and Hardy Kruger
Indiana Jones
Sweet, thanks.
Indiana Jones en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_212_submarine < here’s your answer. They are the most quiet subs to ever operate. Don’t fuck with the Deutsche Marine!
Boaty Mc-Uboaty face
What is the channel going to do after the war ends?
What’s the easiest way to find a genuine broker to help sell a historical artifact (world war 1 submarine telephone)
You are wrong sir, the first gas attack was not at Epes in Belgium it was in a small village in eastern Germany or western Russia, where the Germans first used tear gas
great episode guys, thanks! btw it would be extremely interesting if you did a field trip to some 1WW submarine as you did to the tank museum.
Depends if he finds one in a field.
Well as far as i know there is no ww1 submarine left today ( at least for the germans
please tell the story of scuttling of the german fleet in scapa flow after ww1.
it is slightly embarrassing how much i love your channel. i would support you through patreon but all my money goes on my drug habit. i am sorry.
Great episode!
2:00 a naval crew is a complement, not a compliment. Because this is a quote, the error may be the original author's, not yours. Also, English is the second language of everyone doing production work. So I don't mean to be overly critical. But it is complement.
It could be a typo made by the editor when transcribing the quote onto the image.
Either I'm completely missing something obvious, or you forgot to add the link to the book by your researcher you mentioned in the end. :)
varana312
EU is a joke
Nah, there's no hope competing against the current White House, so we're not doing jokes at the moment.
varana312
OK
Please do:Who did what in ww1 - Karl Donitz.
This video pleases me
wow war to glory sounds like a hoot
Please, please make the intro sound level the same as your talking parts, is really anoying when watching late at night, and your neighbour complains
What are you gonna do after the war has ended? Will you continue talking about what happened afterwards to the second world war? Or will you just go inactive on this channel?
Will you be doing a special on Eddy Rickenbacker?
hopefully that was the last disaster for the White Star Line
How can you search for specific topics on the Great War website? I am interested in WW1 and the Baltic Sea.
Please do erich von manstein in ww1
Here's my question, why wouldn't the germans just send out random gibberish like "dsdafasdf ;k jhjf asdfi plk f; dasklhf lkjshd f" in order to make the brits second guess the reliability of their "crack' of the german codes?
Didn't German submarines in "The Great War" sink Britannic off Greece? Titanic's sister ship?
Yes. Hospital ship😮
It was a sub but it layed a mine and didn't torpedo it
Why don’t we have a Silent Hunter like game but with WW1 U-boats? And 1914: Shells or Fury doesn’t count
Some RNAS pilots managed to destroy a U-Boat by attacking from the air, can't remember the exact dates, but it did happens a few times.
Could you do an episode on Montenegro in WWI?
Did the allies have submarines too? And did they have submarine battles like something out of Red October?
A killer Pacman They had subs and some of them sank other subs, but that all happened while surfaced
can we please get a bio flick ep on noel godfrey chavasse he won the VC twice in ww1 i think you need to tell us his tale.
Odd question but I found out that I had a relative who died in 1917 in the war and would like to research about him. Does anybody have any recommendations on how I would find out info on him, thanks.
Ben Son Depends on which country he came from, but most places have some sort of archive that might give you some information
Wuugaa thanks for the advice, much appreciated :)
will you do an interwar episodes and the ww2 will begain on 1 september
Question for OOTT. You refer to the 'allies'. But in ww1, I always thought it was the entente? Are both correct? Or did it become the entente after Russia withdrew and the USA entered? Many thanks love the show.
Fitzo when Russia was in the war it was known as the entente and I assume it was still called the entente after they left but it is less confusing to say allies
"The Allies", apart from being more recognisable from WW2 and being easier to pronounce for people not knowing French :D, is a more general term - technically, the Entente only consisted of Britain, France, Russia (until 1917), and Italy (since 1915). All other allied countries, most notably the US, were not part of the Entente alliance but had associated or affiliated or similar status.