I remember being in 6th grade when challenger blew up. Then a joke started going around. "What does nasa stand for?"... "need another seven astronauts"
@@master-oppressorso 1977 radio waves were better than modern day communications? Spectrum can't keep constant service and cadillac cant make cars where the bumpers don't fall off yet we went to the moon with interior tech? Nah.
We went a few times, then realized that spending all that money for no return is useless. There is nothing there. We found out there is frozen water in some if the deep craters on the poles. But that isn't a reason to go back.
@ClebRuckus2 space isn't a complete vacuum to begin with. If your argument is that there is no water ice anywhere in the universe besides Earth, we don't even need to have a conversation.
@ So your saying that water in a puny vacuum jar boils or ice sublimates but in a ten to the minus 17 torr vacuum we have ice and water 😆 .Bet you believe in gas giants in the vacuum too. Wether we call it a vacuum or a much much lower pressure system why isnt the gas filling the available volume according to gas law and the second law of thermodynamics? Is space supernatural?
@tkqasqas3278 Dude. You are probably a grown up. And you don't even know what the moon is made of. 😂 Who knows what you will say next. Is it made out of cheese. Can we go there and eat it as well? 😅
Most of the Challenger crew who supposedly blew up on live tv have identical twins like these two with the same names like Judith Resnick who is a University professor in like California 😂
I remember being in grade school, maybe second or third grade. The challenger take off was being viewed in all the classrooms. We all saw it explode, and the poor teachers started panicking and turned the tvs off and making calls for us to get picked up early.
I remember that was a debate when I was a kid. I remember one person said, the moon landing was on TV and the other said, I saw a mouse talking on TV on TV too, but it doesn't I believe it. LMAO.
I assume we went but how is it possible to record over the original film. That has to be one of the most important film in history and we somehow don't hVe it protected enough to let someone record over it? How is that possible
Research "Nasa lies" or "Nasa fakes" and there's a lot of proof that it didn't happen. Someone offered the astronauts money to their favorite charity if they just swore on a Bible that they went and at least 2 punched the guy and others said silly excuses why they wouldn't do it
I live really close to the NASA in greenbelt Maryland, and they had a phone set up that would repeat your voice from a satellite and back. There was a second to half second delays just from a satellite and back!
There was a delay talking to them in the moon and literally every single part of the Apollo missions is open and available. Just cause people don’t understand something doesn’t mean it did not happen. There was over a 1 second delay for single way transmissions on the moon. You talking about orbiting satellites return signal delay is a different type of communication all together. It isn’t just a distance thing you are talking about two very different things.
@AlanpittsS2b no I fully understand what you're saying and I agree there has to be a time delay and I vaguely remember hearing something about that but when they went to the moon I was like 1-year-old.
@@AlanpittsS2bI don’t care about their communications. I wanna know how they stayed warm in -455 Fahrenheit for 7-8 days and were able to go 200,000 miles without the Van Allen radiation belt protecting them? Or how they were able to go 5,300 mph with no propellant to escape the moon‘s gravitational pull?
@ and all of that info is readily available and explanations and proof and actual video of all of those things happening are also available easily. But you will not give it a chance and just claim it’s faked. More than 400k people worked on Apollo. If they faked it why didn’t the soviets call us out for it?? Why did they fake more than one mission when it would just raise the chances of being caught? Was Apollo 13 disaster faked?? If so what for?? Where do you get your info from? No propellant to escape the moon orbit?? That’s not how it worked at all they have the service module rocket engine that they burn to get out of orbit and on a heading to earth. You don’t even know how any of it worked but claim it to be faked. They also go faster than 5300 miles an hour. Whee are you getting these numbers from? There is no drag and no resistance in space so any forward momentum just keeps growing. Just because you don’t understand something does not mean it is fake
@@thanosdoomjuggernaut2846Insulation and the sun. The radiation belt isn’t a constant, and temperature and heat are two different things. They used thrusters to get back from the moon.
I remember watching it when I was in 5th grade and I swear it looked like I saw puppet strings . Now that footage is conveiently unavailable , for whatever reason or excuse NASA is offering . Did we really have satelites and the technology in place to transmit video images from the moon to earth ?🙄
Is this Owen Benjamin? Owen is one of the funniest comedians of all time. He needs a return to main stream! But North Idaho is a beautiful peaceful place. Much love O.B.!
@ You must be a baby! I was born in 57 and there was no such thing as satellite transmission of live video. Heck there was barely video much less “remote” 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
I've always had the same thoughts, the first obvious thing is, why didn't we go back when we had better technology. The other thing is, how did they have a video camera on the moon, taping them landing!! 😅😅😅
There is no video of them landing , there is one of take off they sent the signal a few seconds before and still got it completely wrong as the lander went out of frame then caught up
Grew up as a kid watching Star Trek on reruns. When the Challenger exploded, i said to myself were never going to have a Enterprise in space. P.S. In 1980 saw the Bladerunner movie and couldn't wait for 2019 to come. I'm a disappointed old man. I said it to my self at the time we're never going to have an enterprise in space. P.S. in 1980 i saw the Bladerunner movie and couldn't wait for 2019 to get here. I'm so disappointed with our Govt and Hollywood.
The filming of it was fake is what I got from this. Since they couldn’t actually film it due to limited technology , they had “a artists rendition” of what happened.
It seems the dirt being slung up by the rover instantly fell like it was on earth. I could be wrong, but wouldn't it fly higher than that and fall slower because of low gravity?
@ who knows it’s all fake even the lunar lander you would see dust if there’s no gravity riding on something that’s never been touched. That’s just common sense.
Some people believe we have a robot on Mars driving around taking pictures, but I remember old national geographic magazines have the same pictures in it. And it's not Mars
@@cxvxcbcxnI never said anything was fake. That is putting words in someone’s mouth. Simply using common sense to question ANYTHING and to ask questions is not wrong.
@@cxvxcbcxn Can't go forward when questioning every thing we already know. Wanting to understand and have more precisions on something is good, but questioning a fact, just to be contrarian is literally going backward.
Yup, earth is flat, and aliens live among humans as well. Also, guess you missed the Mythbusters episode that completely debunked the whole “the lunar landingS” (plural) were faked. But stoopid people will believe stoopid things.
A firmament would hold in heat; it's not hot at 60,000'. The Van Allen belt is totally harmless at the speed our astronauts were traveling. The radiation was like a chest x-ray.
@GrosvnerMcaffrey The same way we transport undeveloped film in the real world, bro. We put it in protective envelopes. You've never seen how a circuit board is shipped in protective packaging? Are you really this unaware of how the world works?
@@master-oppressor what "protective envelopes"? I seriously doubt they're radiation proof even if the film was intact it would still get exposed just like when you leave raw footage in light
Actually if you knew anything about science and math the video is what proves it happened. The best part being the hammer and the feather but all of it works. A lot of people think the video was slowed down slightly to "mimic" moon gravity. That doesn't work though. You see on earth objects fall at 9.8 m/s² On the moon it's 1.62 m/s² These are accelerations, meaning speeding up or slowing down video can't change this fundamental relationship. Moon landing conspiracies don't work on people that understand this so I'm probably talking to the wind. If you want to claim it's fake you are going to have to demonstrate how they made everything including the rooster tails from the rover accelerate slower than they would on earth.
That settles everything then, with the gravitational constants you cited that we were all taught in jr. highschool. It's always people who don't know what they are talking about that throw out a couple very low level stats and wants everyone to believe you are stephen hawkings (who was a fraud).
Do you have a link to the video where the guy drops a rock so we can watch Gravity take place? If gravity so slow there then how when they landed on the moon did they hop out and start walking around? Wouldn't there have been dust clouds for hours if not all day
It was the rubber gaskets on the challengers rocket boosters that connect to the fuel tank during lift off. The engineers warned nasa not to do a lift off in cold temps. Nasa rushed the lift after numerous delays. The boosters fall off the shuttle before space....so the explosion has everything to do with the boosters, which are only used diring lift off and "fall off" the shuttle as it enters space. this is in reference to 3:37
I doubt anything they say, but , want to point out .... that....... How many of you know what frequencies of electromagnetic radiation are opaque to the Earth's magnetic field? [I gotta look i t up too, I did take some astronomy and read a lot on it AND you should be able to get some kind of frequency to the moon and back. Maybe not x Rays, but radio waves or something ... gotta look it up. Why they didn't remember the 2 sec delay is kinda sad ..... lol
@@thanosdoomjuggernaut2846 ok, how do you KNOW it didn’t happen? And explain to me how it worked? The stages of the rocket, how TLI worked, how TEI worked, the stages of the lunar module and all of that. I’m sure you’re an expert right??
@@AlanpittsS2b They went 200,000 miles for 7 days without the protection of the Van allen radiation belt. They went 7-days through-455 degrees Fahrenheit. And they would have been traveling at 5300 mph to have escaped the moon‘s gravity. You literally can see on film. They were not traveling that fast and they did not have any propellant on the capsule they left on.
@zwatch2754 The fact that I'm overly aware of the conspiracy theory you are referencing should give you a strong indication that I have but the fact you believe something so clearly false says everything about you. Even the hardcore moon landing deniers overwhelmingly laugh at how absurd that conspiracy is.
Ok Im born in 1980 and just saying, Land lines sound way crisper in ANY weather then wireless. Its a straight line that goes for thousands of miles connecting from power boxes all over the world. A cell phone connects radio waves to towers, which a radio wave can easily be diverted from its destination by ANYTHING, weather, wind, certain materials and other radio waves🫡
the 2 biggest answers to if American went to the Moon (because of genius Nazi scientists) are ... 1) Russia would have disputed the fact, as it was in the middle of the Cold War. 2) you can see the landing sight from the Earth via a telescope.
No, you cannot see the landing sites from Earth with a telescope. They have been photographed by Lunar Orbiters but they're a LOT closer. Bottom line, men have walked on the Moon.
The Soviets were laughing at us. They still laugh about this topic. It's the old open your mouth and remove all doubt (about your intelligence). Go ahead and ask a Russian what they think about our mission to the moon. Hell, ask most nationalities and wait for the giggling.
so I hate to break it to you but the challenger booster doesn't go into outer space. and it was the O-Rings going from freezing to hot temps very quick which caused it's failure. you 3 are showing your ignorance
It's 2025 any yet we are still arguing over if the moon landing is real.😂 I think the best reason we should go back to the moon is because it's going to seem like it's truly the first time we're landing on the moon to us. 🚀 🌙
you can't have a propulsion system in a vacuum. camera film can't survive radiation or extreme temperatures plus and minus 200 degrees. theirs no such thing as a air tight space suit that you can get into. Radio signals couldn't travel that fast, their was no delay.
I remember being in 6th grade when challenger blew up. Then a joke started going around. "What does nasa stand for?"... "need another seven astronauts"
That’s a good one. We’ve always said it stood for “Not A Space Agency”
Our sick joke as kids was…..” what was the first thing that went through Christa McAuliffe head”?
The windshield.
@@Petebootyfudge5312 Never A Straight Answer
@@captainjocassee ours was. What color were her eyes. Ans: blue, one blew this way and one blew that way. NASA was Never A Straight Answer
Wow that was dark and the replies are just…😂 that windshield joke is something else.
Yeah my cell phone in 2025 constantly has connection issues but yeah they had a perfect phone call with no delay in 1969...LMAOOOO
Bro, a telephone is used for radio transmission. A butterfly switch is built into the receiver.
The time-delay of 1.5 seconds was obvious.
@master-oppressor yeah a radio from 238,000 miles away. Okay
@ShepherdofFire151 Radio waves?
Dude, we have communicated with our Voyager spacecraft, sent in 1977. It's 15,000,000,000 miles away.
@@ShepherdofFire151radio signals travel at speed of light, 186,000 miles per second
@@master-oppressorso 1977 radio waves were better than modern day communications? Spectrum can't keep constant service and cadillac cant make cars where the bumpers don't fall off yet we went to the moon with interior tech? Nah.
Real or not, why hasn’t there been another moon landing in almost 60 years?
No need.
We went a few times, then realized that spending all that money for no return is useless. There is nothing there. We found out there is frozen water in some if the deep craters on the poles. But that isn't a reason to go back.
@@bryancollier704Frozen water in the vacuum of space lol have you seen what happens to water or ice in a puny vacuum jar ? Easily fooled 😂
@ClebRuckus2 space isn't a complete vacuum to begin with. If your argument is that there is no water ice anywhere in the universe besides Earth, we don't even need to have a conversation.
@ So your saying that water in a puny vacuum jar boils or ice sublimates but in a ten to the minus 17 torr vacuum we have ice and water 😆 .Bet you believe in gas giants in the vacuum too.
Wether we call it a vacuum or a much much lower pressure system why isnt the gas filling the available volume according to gas law and the second law of thermodynamics? Is space supernatural?
"let's play it safe, let's try not to do too much" 😂😂😂
I’ve said this for 40 years. Never landed on the moon and never will.
😂😂
Never will because it's not even solid. Possibly cosmic plasma.
@@tkqasqas3278 Alright Einstein
@@rexuz2482 I know you're tryna be funny, but I could name a scientist who said the same thing. I can also quote Einstein saying dumb shit.
@tkqasqas3278 Dude. You are probably a grown up. And you don't even know what the moon is made of. 😂
Who knows what you will say next. Is it made out of cheese. Can we go there and eat it as well? 😅
“Text me when you’re out sometimes”😂😂 hilarious
When I first heard people questioning the moon landing I was skeptical. Recently Candace Owens had an episode that completely debunked it.
Yeah its like a no brainer the smoking gun is the van allen radiatiob belts. Theres prob other smoking guns but thats a big one.
Most of the Challenger crew who supposedly blew up on live tv have identical twins like these two with the same names like Judith Resnick who is a University professor in like California 😂
WHAT!?!? 😯
Yep, they are still alive and didn't even try that hard to hide their names. Either they have twins or a different last name
Same people, just with tweaked names. NASA is a huge scam.
I remember being in grade school, maybe second or third grade. The challenger take off was being viewed in all the classrooms. We all saw it explode, and the poor teachers started panicking and turned the tvs off and making calls for us to get picked up early.
Let's ask Stanley Kubrick if they really went.... oh wait.
His kids know
I remember that was a debate when I was a kid. I remember one person said, the moon landing was on TV and the other said, I saw a mouse talking on TV on TV too, but it doesn't I believe it. LMAO.
that unexpected commercial in the end 🤣🤣🤣
I was lmao at the commercial, when your comment strolled through 😅
They always show the astronauts half way down and half way up the ladder but never from the ground up.
One day when I have time im going to make a list of reason's why they did not go to the moon.
This dude never was the same after those "Stars of Death" that Uncle Joey gave him😂
Your right, he became aware of the two faced jerks around him. Seems like a change for the better, not worse.
Last time I went to the moon I couldn't shit for a couple weeks so I know exactly how you feel bro!! 😂😂
I assume we went but how is it possible to record over the original film. That has to be one of the most important film in history and we somehow don't hVe it protected enough to let someone record over it? How is that possible
Research "Nasa lies" or "Nasa fakes" and there's a lot of proof that it didn't happen. Someone offered the astronauts money to their favorite charity if they just swore on a Bible that they went and at least 2 punched the guy and others said silly excuses why they wouldn't do it
This is American your talking about......
hmm
It looks like a cheap budget movie with horrible actors 😂😂
Stanley Kubrick filmed the moon landing in a studio.
I live really close to the NASA in greenbelt Maryland, and they had a phone set up that would repeat your voice from a satellite and back. There was a second to half second delays just from a satellite and back!
There was a delay talking to them in the moon and literally every single part of the Apollo missions is open and available. Just cause people don’t understand something doesn’t mean it did not happen. There was over a 1 second delay for single way transmissions on the moon. You talking about orbiting satellites return signal delay is a different type of communication all together. It isn’t just a distance thing you are talking about two very different things.
@AlanpittsS2b no I fully understand what you're saying and I agree there has to be a time delay and I vaguely remember hearing something about that but when they went to the moon I was like 1-year-old.
@@AlanpittsS2bI don’t care about their communications. I wanna know how they stayed warm in -455 Fahrenheit for 7-8 days and were able to go 200,000 miles without the Van Allen radiation belt protecting them? Or how they were able to go 5,300 mph with no propellant to escape the moon‘s gravitational pull?
@ and all of that info is readily available and explanations and proof and actual video of all of those things happening are also available easily. But you will not give it a chance and just claim it’s faked. More than 400k people worked on Apollo. If they faked it why didn’t the soviets call us out for it?? Why did they fake more than one mission when it would just raise the chances of being caught? Was Apollo 13 disaster faked?? If so what for?? Where do you get your info from? No propellant to escape the moon orbit?? That’s not how it worked at all they have the service module rocket engine that they burn to get out of orbit and on a heading to earth. You don’t even know how any of it worked but claim it to be faked. They also go faster than 5300 miles an hour. Whee are you getting these numbers from? There is no drag and no resistance in space so any forward momentum just keeps growing. Just because you don’t understand something does not mean it is fake
@@thanosdoomjuggernaut2846Insulation and the sun. The radiation belt isn’t a constant, and temperature and heat are two different things. They used thrusters to get back from the moon.
This is great, glad to see the twins have Owen on. Much needed collaboration!
I remember watching it when I was in 5th grade and I swear it looked like I saw puppet strings . Now that footage is conveiently unavailable , for whatever reason or excuse NASA is offering . Did we really have satelites and the technology in place to transmit video images from the moon to earth ?🙄
most of our satellites are suspended by helium. I heard NASA is the largest purchaser of helium.
Is this Owen Benjamin? Owen is one of the funniest comedians of all time. He needs a return to main stream! But North Idaho is a beautiful peaceful place. Much love O.B.!
Two thought provoking questions - Who took the video, and how was it transmitted live…. Back in the 60’s??? 🤦🏻♀️
Bc it wasn't
A remote camera took the picture and they used satellites to send the calls. Pretty simple
@ You must be a baby! I was born in 57 and there was no such thing as satellite transmission of live video. Heck there was barely video much less “remote” 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
I've always had the same thoughts, the first obvious thing is, why didn't we go back when we had better technology. The other thing is, how did they have a video camera on the moon, taping them landing!! 😅😅😅
They didn't. 🤦♂️
There is no video of them landing , there is one of take off they sent the signal a few seconds before and still got it completely wrong as the lander went out of frame then caught up
I wonder if in Russia they have their own skeptic community that doubts Yuri Gragarin and Sputnik.
Its not even skepticism at this point
Grew up as a kid watching Star Trek on reruns. When the Challenger exploded, i said to myself were never going to have a
Enterprise in space. P.S. In 1980 saw the Bladerunner movie and couldn't wait for 2019 to come. I'm a disappointed old man.
I said it to my self at the time we're never going to have an enterprise in space. P.S. in 1980 i saw the Bladerunner movie and couldn't wait for 2019 to get here. I'm so disappointed with our Govt and Hollywood.
NASA is just a film studio
We often fail to recognize greatness in our own time.
We often fail to recognize deceit because of the indoctrination since childhood!!!! All LIES
hmm
The filming of it was fake is what I got from this. Since they couldn’t actually film it due to limited technology , they had “a artists rendition” of what happened.
It seems the dirt being slung up by the rover instantly fell like it was on earth. I could be wrong, but wouldn't it fly higher than that and fall slower because of low gravity?
No air is catching it and holding it up.
@rexuz2482 what air? The moon doesn't have an atmosphere, so it would either be straight line solar winds or nothing.
@frustrated0goat The moon does have an atmosphere, but it is very thin and weak exosphere. Supposedly
@@chandlerjeffries1892🤔
No dust in the doom buggy day was riding around, was bigger than the capsule that they was trying to take back off in
You do realise they didn't drive the buggy out of the lunar lander right? 😂😂🤦♂️
@ who knows it’s all fake even the lunar lander you would see dust if there’s no gravity riding on something that’s never been touched. That’s just common sense.
@@3jimp On earth yes. But they weren't on earth. You forgot to use the common sense you mentioned.
That add was so funny at the end!
Neil Armstrong said during an interview there wasn't a photographer or cameraman on the moon...
What are you talking about
huh
This is the most GED conversation I’ve heard all year.
Well your name fits
When they left blasted off from the moon, there was no dust flying around.????
Because there is no air. Sand will be flying/moving around but there will be no dust. So you won't see it as easily.
Yeah, nothing like a Hollywood celebrity to convince me of something. I’m more willing to think it was true simply because he doesn’t believe it.
I always thought the flag stuck out like that because there was no gravity on the moon? Not that there was a wooden dowel holding it out.😅
That would be dowel.
But how did the flag move around when no one was around it?
There IS gravity on the moon. Sheesh
@huckleberryoutfitters7051 Lol,how do you know that? No human has ever been to the moon.
I was told that you can see the moon from the great wall of China.
Good answer! clap clap clap, .... [
huh
It was 86 and it exploded due to faulty gasket material
Yeah, didn't handle the temperature differences.
The expansion joints on the solid rocket boosters failed due to extreme temperate temperatures in Florida at that time!
Some people believe we have a robot on Mars driving around taking pictures, but I remember old national geographic magazines have the same pictures in it. And it's not Mars
Can you post proof? Because this is just a story.
It's in Iceland or Greenland I believe.
I feel like we definitely went but they showed us the fake version. Just like space. They know what it really looks like but we see the CGI images.
We went. Russia was watching 👀 Putin would be bragging and talking smack if we didn't
@@Gobig4l1f3 wow... cognitive desonamce is high in this one.
I cant get cell phone service, in areas of a major city,.. but they were getting signal, from the moon, in the 60s,.. mic drop
Do you walk around with a giant antenna in your pocket too? 😅
Owen Benjamin is sorely missed.
Just go to the Neil Armstrong muesum. There was no way that tin foil and cardboard went to the moon.
So good, I watched twice!!😂❤
There’s footage of the man jumping… the sand he kicked fell faster than he did
Amature radio ( ham, short wave) travels the world quickly, I'm sure that's what they used.
Propulsion in space is totally different than propulsion inside of a atmosphere. Dear god twins do better.
Damn Good Show!
Damn good podcast ayhhhh!
Van Allen belt. We still can’t cross it with a human. Prove me wrong. It is closer than the moon.
So did they refule at buckies?
There is no need to refuel.
Common sense questions go a long way in life…
which is not the case here
@ oh, yeah? Explain yourself…
Yeah, you gotta follow up with listening to the answers to those questions though...thinking the moon landing was faked is stupid as hell...
@@cxvxcbcxnI never said anything was fake. That is putting words in someone’s mouth. Simply using common sense to question ANYTHING and to ask questions is not wrong.
@@cxvxcbcxn Can't go forward when questioning every thing we already know.
Wanting to understand and have more precisions on something is good, but questioning a fact, just to be contrarian is literally going backward.
There's no way we went to the moon, whether there's a firmament or just the radiation belt there's no way
Yup, earth is flat, and aliens live among humans as well.
Also, guess you missed the Mythbusters episode that completely debunked the whole “the lunar landingS” (plural) were faked.
But stoopid people will believe stoopid things.
A firmament would hold in heat; it's not hot at 60,000'.
The Van Allen belt is totally harmless at the speed our astronauts were traveling. The radiation was like a chest x-ray.
@@master-oppressorx rays are enough to expose old film and make it useless how did they bring the footage back unharmed?
@GrosvnerMcaffrey The same way we transport undeveloped film in the real world, bro.
We put it in protective envelopes.
You've never seen how a circuit board is shipped in protective packaging?
Are you really this unaware of how the world works?
@@master-oppressor what "protective envelopes"? I seriously doubt they're radiation proof even if the film was intact it would still get exposed just like when you leave raw footage in light
Actually if you knew anything about science and math the video is what proves it happened.
The best part being the hammer and the feather but all of it works.
A lot of people think the video was slowed down slightly to "mimic" moon gravity. That doesn't work though.
You see on earth objects fall at 9.8 m/s²
On the moon it's 1.62 m/s²
These are accelerations, meaning speeding up or slowing down video can't change this fundamental relationship.
Moon landing conspiracies don't work on people that understand this so I'm probably talking to the wind.
If you want to claim it's fake you are going to have to demonstrate how they made everything including the rooster tails from the rover accelerate slower than they would on earth.
That settles everything then, with the gravitational constants you cited that we were all taught in jr. highschool. It's always people who don't know what they are talking about that throw out a couple very low level stats and wants everyone to believe you are stephen hawkings (who was a fraud).
😂😂😂😂
Do you have a link to the video where the guy drops a rock so we can watch Gravity take place? If gravity so slow there then how when they landed on the moon did they hop out and start walking around? Wouldn't there have been dust clouds for hours if not all day
69 x 420
Youre obviously a fool then for all your learnings. Because we never made it past the radiation belt.
I really want it to be real because how much it meant to my Grandpa...
Grandpa is safe, it's true.
@@SlickArmorIt’s not true according to Science…
@@thanosdoomjuggernaut2846According to science it’s true. See how you are wrong now.
@@Aeroneus1 No because if you do the math and understand science, we could not have gone to the moon. It’s because of science, I know the truth.
@ Cool, well I do know the math and science and we did go to the moon. You are so bad at debating. I am killing it.
Read his Wikipedia page. lol they so salty over his jokes. I like this guy
There should have been a 4 second delay between talking, sending and receiving. That doesn’t account for the time it takes to reply.
This guy thinks the earth is flat too. Be careful who you listen to.
😑😑😑flat, square or rectangular that’s not the point here. They never went to the mooooon
The earth IS flat
The footage is hilarious and obviously fake, the US never went to the moon 🤣
You think the earth is round...
So you believe the earth is round so where is your proof. The scientists COVID TRUST THE SCIENCE 47 GENDERS MEN CAN GET PREGNANT
Love your guess fit in well all funny ,Thanks for the laughs
I’m from genX, and would definitely have brought a go kart, or at least a BMX bike, that’s why they relegated us to the space shuttle program…🤣👍🤙🖖
I remember having my two young daughters watching the take off of Challenger. Then it blew up, hard to explain to a 4 and 7 year old. 😢😢😂😂
Lmao that escalated
It was the rubber gaskets on the challengers rocket boosters that connect to the fuel tank during lift off. The engineers warned nasa not to do a lift off in cold temps. Nasa rushed the lift after numerous delays. The boosters fall off the shuttle before space....so the explosion has everything to do with the boosters, which are only used diring lift off and "fall off" the shuttle as it enters space. this is in reference to 3:37
Owen benjamin is the man
I thought Owen Benjamin went to the moon after taking a star of death with Joey Diaz on the Church of What's Happening...he was in outerspace🚀👽
I’m sure we went there, but I’m also sure we’ve never been shown what’s there.
Yallz crazy ya know 🤣😆😂
Luv the ad, yall
I agree. We might have landed on the moon but this video is fake af.
That footage is from the Apollo 17 mission the camera was left on the rover and controlled remotely from earth
I doubt anything they say, but , want to point out .... that....... How many of you know what frequencies of electromagnetic radiation are opaque to the Earth's magnetic field? [I gotta look i t up too, I did take some astronomy and read a lot on it AND you should be able to get some kind of frequency to the moon and back. Maybe not x Rays, but radio waves or something ... gotta look it up.
Why they didn't remember the 2 sec delay is kinda sad ..... lol
Just because you don’t understand something does not mean it did not happen.
Daleks Exterminate!
but what if you understand it and know it didn’t happen?
@@thanosdoomjuggernaut2846 ok, how do you KNOW it didn’t happen? And explain to me how it worked? The stages of the rocket, how TLI worked, how TEI worked, the stages of the lunar module and all of that. I’m sure you’re an expert right??
@@AlanpittsS2b They went 200,000 miles for 7 days without the protection of the Van allen radiation belt. They went 7-days through-455 degrees Fahrenheit. And they would have been traveling at 5300 mph to have escaped the moon‘s gravity. You literally can see on film. They were not traveling that fast and they did not have any propellant on the capsule they left on.
@@AlanpittsS2b if you can explain those things then I’m all ears
My dad still thinks we landed on the moon.
We did
Only on television bro...😅@@UnkleRuckusNoRelation
He wants to believe it's ok
So does the rest of the world.
@@W0KeIzEvil my dad’s perceptual ability is awful. My stepsister was a full blown drug addict before he noticed she’s a mess.
Mom believes the moon landing was fake because how the tech we had back then. At least it's a decent theory
Ask your mom to show you how to use a slide-rule.
LRO says otherwise fellas ua-cam.com/video/PTeM4ZqEKR4/v-deo.html
If they didn't have the tech to film on the moon. What the f kind of tech supposedly took them up there.
What an ending fellas!!!
I almost got hit by a hurricane here in Florida. Luckily I know a Navy intel guy who sent up a contrails plane to steer to storm away.
Kubrik would have known to make the footage look believable by downgrading its granual quality
Guess should be guest on last post
"Fruit of a poisonous tree"
Y'all mentioned the Challenger explosion... Look up how all of them that died in the explosion are somehow still alive
But they aren't and it's embarrassing you believe something so clearly false.
@UnkleRuckusNoRelation sounds like you never took the time to research
it is funny that every time you post a comment, a goat escapes over your bridge.
They all died
@zwatch2754 The fact that I'm overly aware of the conspiracy theory you are referencing should give you a strong indication that I have but the fact you believe something so clearly false says everything about you. Even the hardcore moon landing deniers overwhelmingly laugh at how absurd that conspiracy is.
The footage reminds me of a Godzilla movie. Im gad to see you all talking shit about it.
Look into the Van Allen belts and critically think about how they would have successfully navigated thru that not only once but twice upon return.
Ok Im born in 1980 and just saying, Land lines sound way crisper in ANY weather then wireless. Its a straight line that goes for thousands of miles connecting from power boxes all over the world. A cell phone connects radio waves to towers, which a radio wave can easily be diverted from its destination by ANYTHING, weather, wind, certain materials and other radio waves🫡
the 2 biggest answers to if American went to the Moon (because of genius Nazi scientists) are ...
1) Russia would have disputed the fact, as it was in the middle of the Cold War.
2) you can see the landing sight from the Earth via a telescope.
No, you cannot see the landing sites from Earth with a telescope. They have been photographed by Lunar Orbiters but they're a LOT closer. Bottom line, men have walked on the Moon.
The Soviets were laughing at us. They still laugh about this topic. It's the old open your mouth and remove all doubt (about your intelligence). Go ahead and ask a Russian what they think about our mission to the moon. Hell, ask most nationalities and wait for the giggling.
so I hate to break it to you but the challenger booster doesn't go into outer space. and it was the O-Rings going from freezing to hot temps very quick which caused it's failure. you 3 are showing your ignorance
It makes you angry when your worldview is slapped down by reality. This is why the world laughs at Americans.
They didn't land on the moon until later on.
Owen usually backs up everything he says. Great show
“No go cart Gary” always Gary’s fault. Haha
St.Nick was a GINJA NINJA?!
It's 2025 any yet we are still arguing over if the moon landing is real.😂 I think the best reason we should go back to the moon is because it's going to seem like it's truly the first time we're landing on the moon to us. 🚀 🌙
7:35 😂😂😂
I dare you clowns to say it's fake to Buzz Aldrin!
We went to the moon remember when the president make a phone call
I love how people who don’t do research talk so much crap ! There is a 2 minute delay I all those radio transmissions
Stanley made a death bed confession about the moon landing. He said it was fake.
No he didn’t.
you can't have a propulsion system in a vacuum. camera film can't survive radiation or extreme temperatures plus and minus 200 degrees. theirs no such thing as a air tight space suit that you can get into. Radio signals couldn't travel that fast, their was no delay.
No delay he said. 🤣
It's wasn't to cold. It had damaged. Horrible scene.
Even buzz Aldrin says the footage is fake. He said it on Conan O'Brien
Buzz punched a guy in the face who told him the moon landing was fake
Post the vid..
@@TheChewy1969UA-cam won't allow me. I posted it three times. They keep erasing it. It could just be me cuz I'm Shadow banded ed
@@TheChewy1969ua-cam.com/video/PnKEPkw3XwA/v-deo.htmlsi=HNO_34bLeXmn_BKi
@@TheChewy1969 they keep erasing it