Ayon naman pala! Kapal pa ng mukha ng mga Malaysian kung magpumilit pa silang angkinin ang Sabah. Sige magkaisa sana tayong mga Kristiyano at mga Muslim para mabawi natin ang Sabah.
Depende ksi para sa akin, hindinpoyde magkaisa, ksi iba ang christiano at muslim dahil ang mga pagkain nila iba din, at ayaw nilang kumain ng baboy at ang chritiano ay malakas kumain ng baboy, grabe ako rin gusto ko panay baboy pero iba ibang klase pagkaluto.
@@guillermacasquijogs50wnp87 May punto ka riyan. Talagang marami tayong pagkakaiba sa kanilang mga muslim, pero kailngan pa rin nating magkaisa kahit sa kunting bagay man lang. Kung hindi, kailanganin nating maglagay ngayon ng bakod sa ating mga pagitan. Bagay na hindi puwede dahil siguradong ayaw yan ng ating gobyerno dahil di na tayo puwedeng makapasok ng basta basta sa kanila . Siguradong ayaw dn nila na ganyan ang mangyari dahil karamihan sa kanila ay pagninigusyo ang ikinabubuhay. Tungkol naman sa sabah, mag abang na lang tayo ng ipapamalita sa atin ng gobyerno.
Sna Po mbawih nlang Sabah KC subra Ang hrap nng TGA pilipines dto at mrami a nag ssabi dto obosin nla mga tga Philippines dto ppahirapan nla good bless Po mbuhay kyo
@Nur Cali hwag mong sisihin ang MGA Tao sisihin mo ang governo. ang goberno suduporta lng bakit hindi.kaso nagpapa lakas pa Tayo darating Tayo Dyan bro.pag Marcos ang mka upo cgurado lalakas na ang sandatahang lakas Natin para lusobin ang makaysia
i was born in october 1940 and completed my primary, elementary and secondary educaton in 1956. in in those days, in our social studies subject, we learned and clearly remembered that sabah is part of mindanao, philippines.
God bless Teodoro Locsin who has the courage, guts, the balls to declare and to claim it openly as belonging to the Philippines, not Malaysia which repatriated a large number of Muslims even during this covid-19 pandemic. They were all taken care of and nourished back to health by Zamboanga City before returning to Basilan, Sulu, and Tawi-Tawi. It's really best If Malaysia contends with our Nation as a whole and not just with a small number of claimants. That country has not respected the Sultanate, and has only used our people for their own benefit. God bless the Philippines!
presdnt. Digong atin po yang sabba, kaya dapat para lang talaga yan sa mga pilipino. paalisin ang mga taong malaysian jan sa sabba at tayong mga pilipino ang dapat maninirahan jan.... mabuhay kayong mga muslim na naninindigan sa teretoryo natin.. yang mga dilaw na kultong mag ina at ama....mga giatay kayo...atin yan ang sabba at hindi para sa taga malaysiang na ngungupahan lamang sa lupan ng sabba.. fight the right Pilipino...
I am not a Muslim pero ang pinaglalaban nila sa sabah buong puso kong ibibigay ang buhay ko para sa ating bansa....... Mr President you must learn from the past and see the good things ahead of your people... that is if your thinking of the filipino people......
Aba legal pala na atin ang Sabah dapat kunin natin yan kasama ang mga muslim brothers natin sayang lang ang galing ng mga muslim natin para makatulong sa kanila at sa atin bansa....
The best Phil President in decade, who honour, respect, and love the Pilipino Muslim brothers and sisters. Now Philippines is back to Empire of Maharlika and Philippines will have our own King. Salam Po mahal Kong Pangulo at Senator Locsin. God bless you. {Filipino-Australian)
Refer to United Nations? The UN had already made decision and stand that Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Malaysia Mission. The last sentence of the report says: "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia".
Magkaisa Ang mga pilipino.bawiin Yan Sabah Ang kapal naman ng Mukah malisia pa Ang maygana na pilipino.pa Ang pinapaalis jan.ng malisia Kaya dapat mabawe Yan sabah
Sabah is ours, at dapat supportahan ng lahat ng mga mamayang Pilipino ang Duterte administration to take it back, it was Malaysia is only renting our Sabah island, therefore we must take it back it belong's to our country. NO MORE EXCUSE. It's ours.
Ano ngayon kung nagtayo siya ng oilfield sa tabi ng bahay mo di tumira ka doon paano mo mabahantayan ang bahay mo kung di ka tumira sa bahay o lupa mo pumunta ka na doon istorbo magbayad ka ng tax sa akin kapag tinubuan ka na ng utak
It does not matter if the Sabahans refused to join Philippines. They can leave anytime. Anyway, they are just TENANTS. What matters is that the land owner wants to take his property back. And according to the Constitution, the government has the power to enforce the law to protect it's citizen and it's properties. As a fellow citizen, I stand by and support the Sultan in his rightful endeavor to take what he owns by history and heritage.
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 then revalidate the results of the bogus Cobbold Commission report. Where the report ONLY shows ONE THIRD of the population of Sabah favoring the formation of Malaysia. While the TWO THIRD of the population was never given any consideration.
@@rigobertolagumbay4560 , no need to revalidate because the idea or claim or accusation that only 1/3 of population favouring the formation of Malaysia came only 10s of years after the formation of Malaysia. And Cobbold Commission was not the only exercise and the report used. It was the final conclusion of the Secretary-General on Malaysia Mission that determined the formation of Malaysia. Not Cobbold Commission. The sovereignty of Sabah and Sarawak as component states of Malaysia is intact and recognized internationally and recognized by the UN. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the United Nations Malaysia Mission Report "Final Conclusion of the Secretary-General", 14 September 1963. The last sentence of the report says: "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfillment as component states of Malaysia".
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 I did not say that it was the Commission who formed Malaysia. I ONLY said that the Commission report was the one used as basis for such action made by the Secretary General. However, you people did not know the history of that land. The British did not even highlighted the fact that they are paying LEASE money to Sulu. Then your government inherited that responsibility and honorable fulfilled that obligation. Until such time that reports are coming how you abuse and mistreated Filipinos in Sabah as "illegal aliens" on their own land. Not even accorded them federal citizenship as mentioned in the 20 point agreement. Tapos sasabihin mo na ok iyan. As long as iyan na ang nagyari at nabuo ang Federataion of Malaysia ay ok na at idwongrade na lang ang mga pangaabuso na ginagawa ninyo sa mga kapatid namin na matagal nang nakatira diyan panahon pa ng mga pirata at slave trade. You di not even considered talking to Esmail Kiram who was the Sultan of that time and make him a supporter of Malaysia. Bakit siya tumakbo sa Presidente namin na si Diosdado Macapagal at humingi ng tulong na mabawi ang lupang inaakin ninyo? If Sabaha is not a place and it is a people, then look for another land to settle and return North Borneo to its true owner.
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 so you are saying that Lord Cobbold himself made the idea or claim in this summary? Lord Cobbold summarised the Commission's findings as follows: About one-third of the population of each territory strongly favours early realisation of Malaysia without too much concern about terms and conditions. Another third, many of them favourable to the Malaysia project, ask, with varying degrees of emphasis, for conditions and safeguards varying in nature and extent: the warmth of support among this category would be markedly influenced by a firm expression of opinion by Governments that the detailed arrangements eventually agreed upon are in the best interests of the territories. The remaining third is divided between those who insist on independence before Malaysia is considered and those who would strongly prefer to see British rule continue for some years to come. If the conditions and reservations which they have put forward could be substantially met, the second category referred to above would generally support the proposals. Moreover once a firm decision was taken quite a number of the third category would be likely to abandon their opposition and decide to make the best of a doubtful job. There will remain a hard core, vocal and politically active, which will oppose Malaysia on any terms unless it is preceded by independence and self-government: this hard core might amount to near 20 per cent of the population of Sarawak and somewhat less in North Borneo. - Chapter 3 item 144 in the Report of the Commission of Enquiry, North Borneo and Sarawak, 1962, page 44-45
Ang Sabah ay private property ng sultanate ng Sulu. Hindi ito pagaari ng Pilipinas. Upang mabawi ito sa Malaysia. Ang Sultanate of Sulu ay dapat gawing independent State. Sumapi sa UN at bawiin ang sabah bilang sovereign state.
lets help our Muslim brothers to claim back what was once a gift of Sultanate of Brunei to where it belongs and i pray that both Christian and Muslim Filipinos would reunite to compromise this matter for once and for all
Yun nga lang ang solusyon dyan.. Hindi sila aalis hanggat alam nilang ang pilipinas ay walang kakayahang lumaban. Kailangan lang natin ng malakas na pwersa ng sundalo at mga armas.
@@hotstuff3823 Poor AFP with corrupt leaders send more Pinoy as OFW to make your country rich, replace your president with sultan appoint that sulu idiot as your sultan
Filipino hindi filipino ang mga taong naninirahan sa bansang ito sapagkat bansa ito ng MAHARLIKA... bagkus ang Filipino ay simbolo ng pang aapi at simbolo ng pangbabastos at Simbolo ng mapagmataas...yan ang pinas ngunit ang maharlika na bansa ito ay noble mataas na uri at kagalang galang tinitingala saan dako man..sapagkat ang maharlika ay marangya at makatarungan..walang lugar sa bayan na ito ang filipino sapagkat hindi tau mga filipino tayo ay Maharlikano at Maharlikana..wag natin baboyin ang ating mga sarili at isandal sa mabahong pangalan king Philip...na tawagin Philippines sapagkat tau ay marangya Maharlika..wassallam
Oo nmn mabbawe Yan Kung gugustuhin ntin kahit p maraming mmatay sa atin at Hindi mnnalo ang Malaysia laban sa pilipino Wala silang taktika para s laban ng Malaysia laban sa pilipino
@@pepingtam5902 Sabihin mo sa Kongreso at mga Senador bilisan ang Pag usad ng Federalismo sa pilipinas, hangga't Hindi tayo nagiging Federal Parliament state ng pilipinas hindi yan magagawan ng aksyon.
*Hanna Bon, Marcos was the one who DROPPED the PH claim to Sabah. During the 1977 Asean summit, Marcos declared: "Before Asean can look to the outside world for equity, for justice and fairness we must establish order, fairness and justice among ourselves… I wish to announce that the Government of the Republic of the Philippines is therefore taking definite steps to eliminate one of the burdens of Asean - the claim of the Philippine Republic to Sabah."*
@@bongbingbong8089 Marcos dropped the claim in 1977 because, Marcos failed in his plan to restore Sabbah in 1968, because of Ninoy Aquino sabotage the Plan. If Ninoy Aquino did not meddle in the vision of Pres. Marcos to restore Sabbah, maybe we got Sabbah before 1977 where Marcos had no choice but to drop the claim, because of the crab mentality of Ninoy Aquino's ambition to become president.
Matagal na na-invade ng Malaysia ang Sabah,, karamihan mga tao dyan 90%-95% mga pilipino..dapat magbayad ang Malaysia ng malaki sa pag- occupy ng Sabah..
On the other hand, back tracking form history, Spain made a treaty with Britain and Germany to clarify it's southern border. Spain used to have a territory at Sabah. But Spain cannot contain the piracy and moro uprising in the region. So they made a treaty defining the borders of Spanish Philippines in the south. It excluded Sabah as part of the Philippines. This was also used in the Treaty of Paris 1898 with the US to define the boundaries of the new American territory in South East Asia.
The tausog pilipino people with more than 100 years in possession with land of occupied in Sabah become the trustee with historical right and probable cause to acquire the land as ancestral domain shall remain shall prevail
Before the treaty between Britain, Spain and Germany happened there was another significant event. On 22 July 1878, the Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory. In 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. Sulu could not claim anything because they had already relinquished the sovereignty of Sabah to Spain, and then Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain.
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 hahahahaha! Eh bakit kayo nagbabayad ng PAJAK sa Sulu taon taon na minana ninyo sa mga Briton? Kung wala na palang kapangyarihan ang Sulu eh bakit kayo NAGBABAYAD sa kanya taon taon?
Kahi maliit ang renta pero the fact nag nag rerent sila ang ibig sabihin hindi kanila kundi sa Sultanate of Sulu ang pagmamayari ng lugar. Ang Sulu naman ay parte ng Pilipinas kaya sa Pulipinas na rin.
GO COMMAND UR FORCES TO TAKE FROM US !!!!! AND REMEMBER THIS !!!! ONCE YOU TRY THEN WE WILL DECLARED WAR AGAINST YOU AND INVASION ON PHILIPPINES BEGIN !!
@@AzimSobri hey..first they need to face people of sabah..clearly dont want them😅its not shock to see people of sabah repeat history as malaysian fight against intruder..
Yes let us let the UN court decide on the case and abide by whatever will be its decision. Let us resolve the issue as friends and remain as friends right
By 1960 before the formation and independence of Malaysia, Sultan Jamalul Kiram II relinquished his sovereign rights over his domain to the Republic of the Philippines under Macapagal's administration. Therefore ceding the domain as an additional territory to the Republic in which the Philippine government filed a claim to the UN. Unfortunately, the Brits did not agree. Macapagal failed hence the reason why the next President sought to take it by force by the formation of the Jabiddah Commandos.
How could the Sultan relinquished his sovereign rights to the Republic of the Philippines when he didn't have any sovereignty. This was because on 22 July 1878, the Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain. In 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory.
Whole Borneo? Philippines is so greedy, you have many problems internally, you can't handle the Communists, you take many months to defeat ISIS, you can't fight China over Scarborough and Spratly and now you gonna claim Sabah because Malaysia is smaller than Philippines? Nah, Sabah is for Sabahans and we are good under Malaysian rule.
@@deanjosephmendez9217 , "... learn history of Sabah...". It depends on which history and written by who. 1. Philippines wants to claim Sabah because she claims that Sabah belonged to Sulu and Sulu as part of Philippines had given Manila right to claim Sabah. 2. Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu because Brunei had given Sabah (actually only eastern part of Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for helping Brunei to fight and defeat rebels. 3. But Brunei refuted and denied having given eastern part of Sabah to Sulu. Yes Brunei did promise to give eastern part of Sabah to Sulu if Sulu help Brunei to fight and defeat rebels. But Sulu didn't come to help, or they came too late after Brunei had already defeated the rebels by themselves. So according to Brunei, eastern part of Sabah had NOT been given to Sulu. When Sulu soldiers returned to their Sultan they reported that they had helped Brunei defeating the rebels, they dared not telling the truth. So Sulu Sultan thought and assumed that eastern part of Sabah had been given to him. But there was no document signed by both Sultans regarding the transfer of ownership of eastern part of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu. 4. When Brunei ceded Sabah to NBCC, it was the WHOLE of Sabah, showing that Brunei still owned the whole of Sabah. This cession agreement between Brunei and NBCC was documented. 5. When NBCC went to Sabah to do their business, Sulu Sultan claimed that eastern part of Sabah was under Sulu. So NBCC had to make a deal with Sulu Sultan just so that they could do their business. This deal wether it was a lease, rent or cession was documented. 6. BUT STILL THERE WAS NO DOCUMENT OF TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF SABAH FROM BRUNEI TO SULU SIGNED BY BOTH SULTANS. 7. Then NBCC transfered Sabah to the British government because NBCC couldn't afford to rebuild Sabah after WW2. This transfer was based on the fact that the whole of Sabah had been ceded by BRUNEI to NBCC, not by Sulu. It was up to NBCC to transfer Sabah to any other entity. 8. The British government then gave Sabah and Sarawak independence. Subsequently the people of Sabah and Sarawak had made decision of self determination to join Malaysia. 9. According to UN Charter, once the people had exercised self determination, all previous historical events and status would become null and void. What is in force now is what is internationally recognized and recognized by the UN i.e Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Cobbold Commission which was even published in the Philippines Government Gazette. www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1963/09/14/united-nations-malaysia-mission-report-final-conclusions-of-the-secretary-general-14-september-1963/ The last sentence of the report says "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia" 10. On the issue of payment of 'rent", it was officially called "cession money" not "rent". In Manila Accord meeting the descendent of Sulu sultan requested through Manila for Malaysia to continue paying what was left by the British. Malaysia agreed to continue paying even though she was not obligated to pay, with condition that Sulu should not make any physical claim. If Sulu breach the condition then the agreement would be null and void. And it was called "cession money" but in actuality it was merely "consolation money". But to use the term "consolation" was felt to be too degrading, thus the term "cession money" was continually used as used by the British before. 11. Why Malaysia was not obligated to pay. Because as had been explained above, once the people of these territories had exercised self determination to join Malaysia, according to UN Charter, all previous historical events and status would become null and void. 12. When Sulu breached the condition by sending armed men to Lahad Datu to claim Sabah in 2013, Malaysia stopped the payment.
Sometime in history, an Austrian business man made a deal with the Sultan to lease the land to him and the Sultan agreed. From the Austrian it was passed on to his business partner, a British. From the British business man, it was passed on to the British North Borneo Company. And from the company it was passed on to the British crown as Protectorate without the knowledge and consent of the Sultan of Sulu. And later on it was passed on to Malaysia. THEY STILL PAY THE LEASE UP TO THIS DAY.
Not fully true. Sulu only claimed that Sabah was given by Brunei to Sulu as a gift. But Brunei refuted this claim and denied ever having given Sabah to Sulu. There was no document regarding the transfer of ownership of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans. It was a historical fact that on 29 December 1877, Sultan of Brunei ceded the whole of Sabah to BNBC and concurrently appointed Baron Von Overback, the co-owner of BNBC as Maharajah of Sabah and Rajah of Sandakan and Gaya. When BNBC went to Sabah to start their business, Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu. BNBC agreed to enter a "pajak" agreement with Sulu after they were advised by their fellow businessmen in Hong Kong who advised that Sulu would attack them if they didn't have a deal with Sulu. This "pajak' agreement was signed on 22 January 1878. BNBC and early generation of Sulu considered "pajak" in the agreement as "cession". But only later generation of Sulu claimed that it was "lease" or "rent". These led to an overlapping issue for BNBC. However on 22 July 1878, the Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory. Then in 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. Even though Britain had full control of Sabah, they still honoured the annual cession money payment to Sulu on good will. So did Malaysia when Sabah became a component state, Malaysia still honoured the annual cession money payment as consolation for the Sultan of Sulu. The payment was stopped in 2013 after the Sabah standoff incident where the so called "Royal Sulu Security Force" infiltrated Sabah and occupied a village in Lahad Datu.
UN? The UN had already made decision and stand that Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Malaysia Mission. The last sentence of the report says: "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia".
Sana magpakalat ang government natin ng mga evidences na ang sabah ay sa philippines! at sana ituro din ito sa mga schools natin para alam ng mga kabataan!
wagna natin I mention or ungkatin Ang history, sultan ng sulu, sultan ng Brunei,government, politics at iba pa.. Ang pag-usapan natin ngayon yung situation, live situation or yung present..important and history(past) pero mas important ang future.. Ang dapat na mag desisyon Jan yung mga taong nakatira sa sabah, pinanganak, lumaki at nanirahan Jan sa sabah since ninuno pa nila.. Sila ang mas may karapatan mag desisyon sa lupa at tahanan nila.. Kung gusto nila maging Philippines ok, kung gusto nila maging malaysia ok din.. Depends on them.. Ksi yung pinag-aawayan ang may mga taong naninirahan doon, hindi gubat at hindi or isang isla na walang katao-tao.. Let them choose.. And diba its a gift daw.. So pwede rin namang bawiin ng Brunei ulit ang sabah mas gugustuhin pa ng mga local citizen yon.. Kasi Islam country ang gusto nila at katahimikan..Actually ang need na I consider ng government ng both country yung kapakanan ng mga tao.. Saan nila papupuntahin ang thousands of people in sabah?? Masakit mawalan ng tirahan, at kung tirahan na yun ay full of memories ng mga past or ng mga yumaon na.. Hindi pwedeng basta2 itapon ang thousands of people doon parang mga basura lang..
This exactly what I'm talking .. Totoo ang sinabi mo . Sabah native people are kadazan dusun dayak murut and there is identity of mummers (described as Chinese) ..
It depends on which history and written by who. 1. Philippines wants to claim Sabah because she claims that Sabah belonged to Sulu and Sulu as part of Philippines had given Manila right to claim Sabah. 2. Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu because Brunei had given Sabah (actually only eastern part of Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for helping Brunei to fight and defeat rebels. 3. But Brunei refuted and denied having given eastern part of Sabah to Sulu. Yes Brunei did promise to give eastern part of Sabah to Sulu if Sulu help Brunei to fight and defeat rebels. But Sulu didn't come to help, or they came too late after Brunei had already defeated the rebels by themselves. So according to Brunei, eastern part of Sabah had NOT been given to Sulu. When Sulu soldiers returned to their Sultan they reported that they had helped Brunei defeating the rebels, they dared not telling the truth. So Sulu Sultan thought and assumed that eastern part of Sabah had been given to him. But there was no document signed by both Sultans regarding the transfer of ownership of eastern part of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu. 4. When Brunei ceded Sabah to NBCC, it was the WHOLE of Sabah, showing that Brunei still owned the whole of Sabah. This cession agreement between Brunei and NBCC was documented. 5. When NBCC went to Sabah to do their business, Sulu Sultan claimed that eastern part of Sabah was under Sulu. So NBCC had to make a deal with Sulu Sultan just so that they could do their business. This deal wether it was a lease, rent or cession was documented. 6. BUT STILL THERE WAS NO DOCUMENT OF TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF SABAH FROM BRUNEI TO SULU SIGNED BY BOTH SULTANS. 7. Then NBCC transfered Sabah to the British government because NBCC couldn't afford to rebuild Sabah after WW2. This transfer was based on the fact that the whole of Sabah had been ceded by BRUNEI to NBCC, not by Sulu. It was up to NBCC to transfer Sabah to any other entity. 8. The British government then gave Sabah and Sarawak independence. Subsequently the people of Sabah and Sarawak had made decision of self determination to join Malaysia. 9. According to UN Charter, once the people had exercised self determination, all previous historical events and status would become null and void. What is in force now is what is internationally recognized and recognized by the UN i.e Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Cobbold Commission which was even published in the Philippines Government Gazette. www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1963/09/14/united-nations-malaysia-mission-report-final-conclusions-of-the-secretary-general-14-september-1963/ The last sentence of the report says "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia" 10. On the issue of payment of 'rent", it was officially called "cession money" not "rent". In Manila Accord meeting the descendent of Sulu sultan requested through Manila for Malaysia to continue paying what was left by the British. Malaysia agreed to continue paying even though she was not obligated to pay, with condition that Sulu should not make any physical claim. If Sulu breach the condition then the agreement would be null and void. And it was called "cession money" but in actuality it was merely "consolation money". But to use the term "consolation" was felt to be too degrading, thus the term "cession money" was continually used as used by the British before. 11. Why Malaysia was not obligated to pay. Because as had been explained above, once the people of these territories had exercised self determination to join Malaysia, according to UN Charter, all previous historical events and status would become null and void. 12. When Sulu breached the condition by sending armed men to Lahad Datu to claim Sabah in 2013, Malaysia stopped the payment. 13. On the issue of leasing agreement between NBCC and Sulu Sultan, it was "cession agreement" not "leasing agreement".
dahil cguro wlng ginwa si pinoy sa sabah dahil noung kapanahonan pa ng ama at ina nia bago namatai sa malisya nag tungo at nag.tago ang kanya ama bago umuwe ng pinas!!
bkt sabah Malaysia.. e Philippines sabah yan aahh.. dpt nmg tlga saatin yan aahh.. dpt bawain ng Philippines government ang sabah pra d tayo crowded sa bansa ntg. puro inankin ang part ng Philippines e
Philippines: Can't stop Commie insurgency Can't stop chaos in Mindanao Can't stop China in SCS Also Philippines: Let's take Sabah, hope we win this time. 😂🤣😅😆
How come sultan sulu want to claim sabah when they even ruled by phillipine govt and can't even get indipendence from phillipine to become an independent nation. court of Justice are only recognize claim made by sovereign country and not by the the self proclaim sultan's which kingdom is no more exist in this modern world
@@ofiepidel2067 , Philippines CLAIMS Sabah on the basis that Sabah was CLAIMED to be once under Sulu. Descendent of Sulu sultan CLAIMED that Sabah was given by Brunei to Sulu as a gift. But Brunei refuted this claim and denied ever having given Sabah (actually only eastern part of Sabah) to Sulu. There was NO DOCUMENT regarding the transfer of ownership of eastern part of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans. Sulu and subsequently Philippines never owned eastern part of Sabah from the very start.
Unless the one who will lead our country Philippines will not value the blood of our ancestors and his heart is apart to defend our nation, Philippines in the future will be owned by foreign people. Wake up Philippines! Look Israel! They defend their nation for they value what God was given to them. It is not we want a war, but it is about how we value of what our ancestors given to us. Either your muslim or christian, our blood are they same. Do not let the invaders succeed and do not let them use religion to separate Pilipinos.
The agreement between Sultan Sulu and British North Borneo Company or BNBC on 22nd January 1878 involved only these two parties. On 22nd July 1878, Sultan Sulu relinquished his sovereignty on Sulu Archipelago and its dependencies thereof to Spain. On the same day, Sultan Sulu wrote to Governor General of Philippines and Governor of Sulu terminating the agreement between Sulu Sultanate and BNBC. The agreement between Sultan Sulu and BNBC on 22 January 1878 is null and void. On 24 July 1878 Governor of Sulu wrote to BNBC concerning the Spanish sovereignty on Sulu and its dependencies including North Borneo and the termination of the 1878 agreement between BNBC and Sultan Sulu. A letter was then written to the Spanish Government in Madrid and the issue was raised with the British Government. Finally, the issue on the agreement between Sultan Sulu and BNBC and the status of North Borneo was settled through the Madrid Protocol 1885. North Borneo belongs to the British under the Madrid Protocol. Again, on the 25th November 1957, the latter Sultanate of Sulu declared termination of the lease between Sulu and BNBC effective on 22 January 1958. Thus, the agreement is null and void twice. No payment is required as there is no new agreement. Earlier, the British (before formation of Malaysia) also do not have such an agreement. Malaysia is not responsible (like payment for cession/rent) as it does not involve (not exist prior to 1963) in any of the above agreement. Malaysia only make payment after the Manila Accord meeting in 1963 as requested by the Philippines Government. The token amount might be a gift to the Sultanate to cool down the situation. That is why the amount is ridiculously small in Malaysian dollar and not Mexican Gold Dollar used during that era (1878). On 17th December 2002, in the case of ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan between Malaysia and Indonesia, ICJ make a decision rejecting Philippines intervention in the court case (historical and legal rights on North Borneo) on the ground that there is non-existence of an interest of legal nature. Attesting that the Bases of Peace and Capitulation agreement in 1878 between Spain and Sulu is definitive as Sultan of Sulu has definitively relinquished Archipelago of Sulu and its dependencies to Spain thus include North Borneo.
Dapat po manindigan ang Philippine Govt.na basin ang Sabah...kung talagang sa Pilipinas ito by hook or by crook...kung do makukuha sa diplomasyang usapan...
Then give independence to Sultanate of Sulu then let them claim Sabah. Malaysia doesn't negotiate with a Sultan that doesn't have his own country, Sulu is now part of the Philippines, your Sultan is just only a PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL with government recognition due to his ceremonial royal title. Give Sulu independence then we will talk. For now, it's either on Malaysia or Brunei (very first owner) hand.
Sabah, Malaysia, all UN countries recognize it as part of Malaysia, you can't fight the Commies, you can't fight China, now you gonna fight us cause we are "equal." Stop CLAIMING THE WHOLE WORLD!
The people of Sabah and Sarawak had made decision of self determination to join Malaysia. According to UN Charter, once the people of these territories had exercised self determination, all previous historical events and status would become null and void. What is in force now is what is internationally recognized and recognized by the UN, i.e Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Cobbold Commission which was even published in the Philippines Government Gazette. www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1963/09/14/united-nations-malaysia-mission-report-final-conclusions-of-the-secretary-general-14-september-1963/ The last sentence of the report says "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia".
Tutulong po ang kanan mg katipunan sa Development ng lugar Mr president handa ang kaban na tumulong sa kapatid Nais kong maging parte ng peace Para Ma protektahan ang mga kapatid
DAPAT LANG. IBALIK ANG SABAH. SA PILIPINAS DAHIL PAGAARI NG PILIINAS HISTORICAL NG SULTANATE OF SOLO SA ATING BANSANG SABAH PILIPINAS. SA ATING. PERLAS NG SILANGANAN..
Mababawi natin Sabah, gamitin Ng pamahalaan Ang pag alyansa sa us at japan... Makakatulong sa pagpapalakas Ng ating Bansa.. kailangan lumaban na tayo' hndi mananahimik Lang tayo' at ating pamahalaan.
We are tired to understand the greed of other nations. We Filipinos are givers to the needs of others. Now, it's high time to listen to SULTANATE which they have been understanding about the situation. We are ready to fight for our OURS...
Ayon naman pala! Kapal pa ng mukha ng mga Malaysian kung magpumilit pa silang angkinin ang Sabah. Sige magkaisa sana tayong mga Kristiyano at mga Muslim para mabawi natin ang Sabah.
Fily
Lll9
Depende ksi para sa akin, hindinpoyde magkaisa, ksi iba ang christiano at muslim dahil ang mga pagkain nila iba din, at ayaw nilang kumain ng baboy at ang chritiano ay malakas kumain ng baboy, grabe ako rin gusto ko panay baboy pero iba ibang klase pagkaluto.
paano mababawi na pinag uusapan na yan.
@@guillermacasquijogs50wnp87 May punto ka riyan. Talagang marami tayong pagkakaiba sa kanilang mga muslim, pero kailngan pa rin nating magkaisa kahit sa kunting bagay man lang. Kung hindi, kailanganin nating maglagay ngayon ng bakod sa ating mga pagitan. Bagay na hindi puwede dahil siguradong ayaw yan ng ating gobyerno dahil di na tayo puwedeng makapasok ng basta basta sa kanila . Siguradong ayaw dn nila na ganyan ang mangyari dahil karamihan sa kanila ay pagninigusyo ang ikinabubuhay. Tungkol naman sa sabah, mag abang na lang tayo ng ipapamalita sa atin ng gobyerno.
Sna Po mbawih nlang Sabah KC subra Ang hrap nng TGA pilipines dto at mrami a nag ssabi dto obosin nla mga tga Philippines dto ppahirapan nla good bless Po mbuhay kyo
All Bangsamoros And Filipinos Need Support We Need To Help Each Other
BAngsamoros are also Filipinos like visaya or pampangineo we all Filipino no Division kaya tayo kinakaya kaya kahit saten hindi tayo solid.
@@olidojosephd.9054 You are free to leave sabah and go to Malaysia...
@@olidojosephd.9054 we dont claim the people . if you want to be malaysian then go to malaysia .
Yes definitely brothers we will United against the oppressors...maharlikans will rise again...
@Nur Cali hwag mong sisihin ang MGA Tao sisihin mo ang governo. ang goberno suduporta lng bakit hindi.kaso nagpapa lakas pa Tayo darating Tayo Dyan bro.pag Marcos ang mka upo cgurado lalakas na ang sandatahang lakas Natin para lusobin ang makaysia
Mabuhay po kayo Datu Raja Muda.
He is already dead.
Pilipinas ay atin dapat ay bawiin kahit ano pang mangyari...
Now is nearly 1 year already. Have you achieve anything?
i was born in october 1940 and completed my primary, elementary and secondary educaton in 1956. in in those days, in our social studies subject, we learned and clearly remembered that sabah is part of
mindanao, philippines.
1954 ako ipinanganak aklat na pang SOCIAL STUDIES KASAMA PA ANG MAPA NG PILIPINAS ANG BORNEO NA NGAYON AY SABAH GRADE 4 SUBJECT WE BACK 1964
Kaya dapat maging solid na tayung lahat oara sa mga Marcos para mabawe nayan kasi ang Sabah ay parte. Naman talaga ng pilipinas
I AGREE WITH WHAT U STILL REMEMBER IN THE PAST..
The text books and the curriculum off course were written by Filipinos.
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 stop sending fake news disbanded your fake federation.
Ka tunying solid BBM
Sana sa susunod na Administrasyon ay ipaglaban na mabawi ang Sabah. Ang Sabah ay pag mamay-ari ng Pilipinas.
Now is 2024, and you have new president and new government. What is the development now?
Delusional….Sabah is owned by Sabahan not Philipino
Dapat suportahan Ng ating pamahalaan. Karapatan Ng ating kapwa pilipino sa Sabah..
God bless Teodoro Locsin who has the courage, guts, the balls to declare and to claim it openly as belonging to the Philippines, not Malaysia which repatriated a large number of Muslims even during this covid-19 pandemic. They were all taken care of and nourished back to health by Zamboanga City before returning to Basilan, Sulu, and Tawi-Tawi. It's really best If Malaysia contends with our Nation as a whole and not just with a small number of claimants. That country has not respected the Sultanate, and has only used our people for their own benefit. God bless the Philippines!
sino nandito dahil sa tiktok about sabah?
In my elementary years in the 1970s, Sabah was already part of the Philippines in all our published Philippine maps.
It was because the curriculum was written by Filipino.
Kunin natin ang saba please. Magka isa tayung lahat.
presdnt. Digong atin po yang sabba, kaya dapat para lang talaga yan sa mga pilipino. paalisin ang mga taong malaysian jan sa sabba at tayong mga pilipino ang dapat maninirahan jan.... mabuhay kayong mga muslim na naninindigan sa teretoryo natin..
yang mga dilaw na kultong mag ina at ama....mga giatay kayo...atin yan ang sabba at hindi para sa taga malaysiang na ngungupahan lamang sa lupan ng sabba.. fight the right Pilipino...
Di ka mananalo
Iv
Had been hearing this kind of rhetorics since 30 to 40 years ago.
Babawiin natin sa paguusap na maganda
Kilala tayung pilipino na the rising tiger kaya sana wag nating isuko ang ating mga isla sana mabawi natin lhat ng isla natin!
Which island?
I am not a Muslim pero ang pinaglalaban nila sa sabah buong puso kong ibibigay ang buhay ko para sa ating bansa....... Mr President you must learn from the past and see the good things ahead of your people... that is if your thinking of the filipino people......
Aba legal pala na atin ang Sabah dapat kunin natin yan kasama ang mga muslim brothers natin sayang lang ang galing ng mga muslim natin para makatulong sa kanila at sa atin bansa....
The best Phil President in decade, who honour, respect, and love the Pilipino Muslim brothers and sisters. Now Philippines is back to Empire of Maharlika and Philippines will have our own King. Salam Po mahal Kong Pangulo at Senator Locsin. God bless you. {Filipino-Australian)
Dapat isampa na ng Pilipinas sa United Nations ang issues tungkol sa Sabah
Refer to United Nations? The UN had already made decision and stand that Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Malaysia Mission. The last sentence of the report says:
"I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia".
Tutulong ako sa Sultan of Sulu para bawiin ang Sabah sa anumang paraan
That's why we need to study secret history.
Magkaisa Ang mga pilipino.bawiin Yan Sabah Ang kapal naman ng Mukah malisia pa Ang maygana na pilipino.pa Ang pinapaalis jan.ng malisia Kaya dapat mabawe Yan sabah
Sabah is ours, at dapat supportahan ng lahat ng mga mamayang Pilipino ang Duterte administration to take it back, it was Malaysia is only renting our Sabah island, therefore we must take it back it belong's to our country. NO MORE EXCUSE. It's ours.
Kmi dto sa sabah handa kmi mgbuwis ng buhay dhil atin talaga ang sabah?
Bakit question mark nilagay mo
Ano ngayon kung nagtayo siya ng oilfield sa tabi ng bahay mo di tumira ka doon paano mo mabahantayan ang bahay mo kung di ka tumira sa bahay o lupa mo pumunta ka na doon istorbo magbayad ka ng tax sa akin kapag tinubuan ka na ng utak
For the Sultanate of Sulu...
m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=876666346141967&id=100013958299037
God bless you all brother
Sa atin yan rent lang ng malaysian govt.
It does not matter if the Sabahans refused to join Philippines. They can leave anytime. Anyway, they are just TENANTS. What matters is that the land owner wants to take his property back. And according to the Constitution, the government has the power to enforce the law to protect it's citizen and it's properties. As a fellow citizen, I stand by and support the Sultan in his rightful endeavor to take what he owns by history and heritage.
If Sabahans refuse to join Philippines and they don't want to leave because they always want Sabah to be in Malaysia, what do you want to do?
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 then revalidate the results of the bogus Cobbold Commission report. Where the report ONLY shows ONE THIRD of the population of Sabah favoring the formation of Malaysia. While the TWO THIRD of the population was never given any consideration.
@@rigobertolagumbay4560 , no need to revalidate because the idea or claim or accusation that only 1/3 of population favouring the formation of Malaysia came only 10s of years after the formation of Malaysia. And Cobbold Commission was not the only exercise and the report used. It was the final conclusion of the Secretary-General on Malaysia Mission that determined the formation of Malaysia. Not Cobbold Commission.
The sovereignty of Sabah and Sarawak as component states of Malaysia is intact and recognized internationally and recognized by the UN. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the United Nations Malaysia Mission Report "Final Conclusion of the Secretary-General", 14 September 1963. The last sentence of the report says:
"I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfillment as component states of Malaysia".
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 I did not say that it was the Commission who formed Malaysia. I ONLY said that the Commission report was the one used as basis for such action made by the Secretary General. However, you people did not know the history of that land. The British did not even highlighted the fact that they are paying LEASE money to Sulu. Then your government inherited that responsibility and honorable fulfilled that obligation. Until such time that reports are coming how you abuse and mistreated Filipinos in Sabah as "illegal aliens" on their own land. Not even accorded them federal citizenship as mentioned in the 20 point agreement. Tapos sasabihin mo na ok iyan. As long as iyan na ang nagyari at nabuo ang Federataion of Malaysia ay ok na at idwongrade na lang ang mga pangaabuso na ginagawa ninyo sa mga kapatid namin na matagal nang nakatira diyan panahon pa ng mga pirata at slave trade. You di not even considered talking to Esmail Kiram who was the Sultan of that time and make him a supporter of Malaysia. Bakit siya tumakbo sa Presidente namin na si Diosdado Macapagal at humingi ng tulong na mabawi ang lupang inaakin ninyo? If Sabaha is not a place and it is a people, then look for another land to settle and return North Borneo to its true owner.
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 so you are saying that Lord Cobbold himself made the idea or claim in this summary?
Lord Cobbold summarised the Commission's findings as follows:
About one-third of the population of each territory strongly favours early realisation of Malaysia without too much concern about terms and conditions. Another third, many of them favourable to the Malaysia project, ask, with varying degrees of emphasis, for conditions and safeguards varying in nature and extent: the warmth of support among this category would be markedly influenced by a firm expression of opinion by Governments that the detailed arrangements eventually agreed upon are in the best interests of the territories. The remaining third is divided between those who insist on independence before Malaysia is considered and those who would strongly prefer to see British rule continue for some years to come. If the conditions and reservations which they have put forward could be substantially met, the second category referred to above would generally support the proposals. Moreover once a firm decision was taken quite a number of the third category would be likely to abandon their opposition and decide to make the best of a doubtful job. There will remain a hard core, vocal and politically active, which will oppose Malaysia on any terms unless it is preceded by independence and self-government: this hard core might amount to near 20 per cent of the population of Sarawak and somewhat less in North Borneo.
- Chapter 3 item 144 in the Report of the Commission of Enquiry, North Borneo and Sarawak, 1962, page 44-45
Dapat mabawi natin ang sabah dahil atin to!!
Proof?
I am a Christian but I will be in the favor of the side of our Muslim brothers
Ang Sabah ay private property ng sultanate ng Sulu. Hindi ito pagaari ng Pilipinas. Upang mabawi ito sa Malaysia. Ang Sultanate of Sulu ay dapat gawing independent State. Sumapi sa UN at bawiin ang sabah bilang sovereign state.
Handa akong makipag guira sa malaysia kong kailangan.
Kung magrecrut sila pars bawiin ang sabah pupunta ako!
Ako rin
Ako rin Ya Allah
lets help our Muslim brothers to claim back what was once a gift of Sultanate of Brunei to where it belongs and i pray that both Christian and Muslim Filipinos would reunite to compromise this matter for once and for all
Kailangan,natin mabawi yan,need lang natin ng anti aircraft missiles at tanks,Kung ayaw nila ibigay ng mapayapa!!KUKUNIN NATIN NG PALAKASAN!!!!!
Tapos ikaw lalaban
@@marloualfeche7836 oo sasama ko
Hinda kayo lumaban mga walang itlog, duwag
Yun nga lang ang solusyon dyan.. Hindi sila aalis hanggat alam nilang ang pilipinas ay walang kakayahang lumaban. Kailangan lang natin ng malakas na pwersa ng sundalo at mga armas.
@@hotstuff3823 Poor AFP with corrupt leaders send more Pinoy as OFW to make your country rich, replace your president with sultan appoint that sulu idiot as your sultan
Dapat mabawi Yan para maibigay say mga Muslims brother and sisters..
Sabah is ours we Filipino must fight for it. "Ang mamatay ng dahil sayo"
Don't ever dream
maganda tanungin si nur misuari kung saang panig siya dito kung sa malysian government ba o sa philippine government ba?
Bawiin pls.
Filipino hindi filipino ang mga taong naninirahan sa bansang ito sapagkat bansa ito ng MAHARLIKA... bagkus ang Filipino ay simbolo ng pang aapi at simbolo ng pangbabastos at Simbolo ng mapagmataas...yan ang pinas ngunit ang maharlika na bansa ito ay noble mataas na uri at kagalang galang tinitingala saan dako man..sapagkat ang maharlika ay marangya at makatarungan..walang lugar sa bayan na ito ang filipino sapagkat hindi tau mga filipino tayo ay Maharlikano at Maharlikana..wag natin baboyin ang ating mga sarili at isandal sa mabahong pangalan king Philip...na tawagin Philippines sapagkat tau ay marangya Maharlika..wassallam
@Scorpio Rose Gusto mo talagang magpalahi?
Abs: mababawi pa ba ang Sabah
Sec. Locsin: oo naman
Oo nmn mabbawe Yan Kung gugustuhin ntin kahit p maraming mmatay sa atin at Hindi mnnalo ang Malaysia laban sa pilipino Wala silang taktika para s laban ng Malaysia laban sa pilipino
Magipon ka muna ng armas tapatan mo kung hindi tumahinik ka na lang
@@ronaldpayos9669 , had been hearing this kind of rhetorics since 30 to 40 years ago.
Tingin ko mababawi yan! kapag si BBM ang maging Presidente...
True
Anagaw nanga sa atin ang scarburosoul aagawin pa saatin ng malaysia ang sabah anu nlng ang mangyayari sa atin kung hindi natin ito ipaglaban.
Matatapos na ang term ni DU30 pero wala pa ring syang ginagawa.
@@pepingtam5902 Sabihin mo sa Kongreso at mga Senador bilisan ang Pag usad ng Federalismo sa pilipinas, hangga't Hindi tayo nagiging Federal Parliament state ng pilipinas hindi yan magagawan ng aksyon.
Sabah issue should be resolved through the international court just like the west phillipine sea
I remember when iwas in elementary sabah is one of our topic in social studies
Supptahan natin ang govt. wag naman puro panghihinaang ng loob may laban tayo dalhin natin sa intl cuort justice!!!!
Dapat bawiin upang Hindi tau mawalan Ng tiritoryo.
Sayang pinaghirapan ni Marcos
+Analie Tizon fuck marcos,,,
*Hanna Bon, Marcos was the one who DROPPED the PH claim to Sabah. During the 1977 Asean summit, Marcos declared: "Before Asean can look to the outside world for equity, for justice and fairness we must establish order, fairness and justice among ourselves… I wish to announce that the Government of the Republic of the Philippines is therefore taking definite steps to eliminate one of the burdens of Asean - the claim of the Philippine Republic to Sabah."*
@@bongbingbong8089 Marcos dropped the claim in 1977 because, Marcos failed in his plan to restore Sabbah in 1968, because of Ninoy Aquino sabotage the Plan. If Ninoy Aquino did not meddle in the vision of Pres. Marcos to restore Sabbah, maybe we got Sabbah before 1977 where Marcos had no choice but to drop the claim, because of the crab mentality of Ninoy Aquino's ambition to become president.
Its called "Operation Merdekka"
The plan to claim Sabah back
Mga fuckyou kayo taga hanga ng aquino isa kayo sa katulong nila sa pag papahirap sa mga pinoy, mga bulag sa katotohanan..
Yes dapat lang.!
TAMA naman, "HOY AMIN YAN"
Para sa akin kahit anong uras handa ako makikipag laban kong kinakailangan.
Matagal na na-invade ng Malaysia ang Sabah,, karamihan mga tao dyan 90%-95% mga pilipino..dapat magbayad ang Malaysia ng malaki sa pag- occupy ng Sabah..
Dahil sa pangloloko walang kapayapaan na magaganap Dyan
Yes dapat..
I got teary eyed sa nagyayari sana naman tulungan sila ng bansang Pilipinas
Crocodile tears.
Dapat lang na ipagtangol ang ating karapatan.
On the other hand, back tracking form history, Spain made a treaty with Britain and Germany to clarify it's southern border. Spain used to have a territory at Sabah. But Spain cannot contain the piracy and moro uprising in the region. So they made a treaty defining the borders of Spanish Philippines in the south. It excluded Sabah as part of the Philippines. This was also used in the Treaty of Paris 1898 with the US to define the boundaries of the new American territory in South East Asia.
The tausog pilipino people with more than 100 years in possession with land of occupied in Sabah become the trustee with historical right and probable cause to acquire the land as ancestral domain shall remain shall prevail
Before the treaty between Britain, Spain and Germany happened there was another significant event. On 22 July 1878, the Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory.
In 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. Sulu could not claim anything because they had already relinquished the sovereignty of Sabah to Spain, and then Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain.
@@abdulwahidmdtahir3660 hahahahaha! Eh bakit kayo nagbabayad ng PAJAK sa Sulu taon taon na minana ninyo sa mga Briton? Kung wala na palang kapangyarihan ang Sulu eh bakit kayo NAGBABAYAD sa kanya taon taon?
Kahi maliit ang renta pero the fact nag nag rerent sila ang ibig sabihin hindi kanila kundi sa Sultanate of Sulu ang pagmamayari ng lugar. Ang Sulu naman ay parte ng Pilipinas kaya sa Pulipinas na rin.
Sabah,Philippines not Sabah,Malaysia
V Fifth we Sabah are Malaysia not Philippine
Rajaie Please leave Sabah you're only renting the land.
GO COMMAND UR FORCES TO TAKE FROM US !!!!! AND REMEMBER THIS !!!! ONCE YOU TRY THEN WE WILL DECLARED WAR AGAINST YOU AND INVASION ON PHILIPPINES BEGIN !!
@@AzimSobri hey..first they need to face people of sabah..clearly dont want them😅its not shock to see people of sabah repeat history as malaysian fight against intruder..
May panahon ang sabah ph makukuha din yan giyera kung giyera pag dating ng panahon
Yes let us let the UN court decide on the case and abide by whatever will be its decision. Let us resolve the issue as friends and remain as friends right
By 1960 before the formation and independence of Malaysia, Sultan Jamalul Kiram II relinquished his sovereign rights over his domain to the Republic of the Philippines under Macapagal's administration. Therefore ceding the domain as an additional territory to the Republic in which the Philippine government filed a claim to the UN. Unfortunately, the Brits did not agree. Macapagal failed hence the reason why the next President sought to take it by force by the formation of the Jabiddah Commandos.
Sabah belongs to the Philippines
@@sixtopueblas2409, in your dream.
How could the Sultan relinquished his sovereign rights to the Republic of the Philippines when he didn't have any sovereignty. This was because on 22 July 1878, the Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain.
In 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory.
Dapat natin bawiin iyan atin yan. Laban Patay o buhay...
ONE OF THESE DAYS PRESIDENT MAYOR DUTERTE WILL RECOVER BORNEO...THAT WILL BE AND IT WILL BE...
Anong petsa na
Whole Borneo? Philippines is so greedy, you have many problems internally, you can't handle the Communists, you take many months to defeat ISIS, you can't fight China over Scarborough and Spratly and now you gonna claim Sabah because Malaysia is smaller than Philippines? Nah, Sabah is for Sabahans and we are good under Malaysian rule.
@@olidojosephd.9054 learn the history of sabah why the Malaysian government paying the rent money to the prince of julu?
@@deanjosephmendez9217 , "... learn history of Sabah...". It depends on which history and written by who.
1. Philippines wants to claim Sabah because she claims that Sabah belonged to Sulu and Sulu as part of Philippines had given Manila right to claim Sabah.
2. Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu because Brunei had given Sabah (actually only eastern part of Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for helping Brunei to fight and defeat rebels.
3. But Brunei refuted and denied having given eastern part of Sabah to Sulu. Yes Brunei did promise to give eastern part of Sabah to Sulu if Sulu help Brunei to fight and defeat rebels. But Sulu didn't come to help, or they came too late after Brunei had already defeated the rebels by themselves. So according to Brunei, eastern part of Sabah had NOT been given to Sulu. When Sulu soldiers returned to their Sultan they reported that they had helped Brunei defeating the rebels, they dared not telling the truth. So Sulu Sultan thought and assumed that eastern part of Sabah had been given to him. But there was no document signed by both Sultans regarding the transfer of ownership of eastern part of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu.
4. When Brunei ceded Sabah to NBCC, it was the WHOLE of Sabah, showing that Brunei still owned the whole of Sabah. This cession agreement between Brunei and NBCC was documented.
5. When NBCC went to Sabah to do their business, Sulu Sultan claimed that eastern part of Sabah was under Sulu. So NBCC had to make a deal with Sulu Sultan just so that they could do their business. This deal wether it was a lease, rent or cession was documented.
6. BUT STILL THERE WAS NO DOCUMENT OF TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF SABAH FROM BRUNEI TO SULU SIGNED BY BOTH SULTANS.
7. Then NBCC transfered Sabah to the British government because NBCC couldn't afford to rebuild Sabah after WW2. This transfer was based on the fact that the whole of Sabah had been ceded by BRUNEI to NBCC, not by Sulu. It was up to NBCC to transfer Sabah to any other entity.
8. The British government then gave Sabah and Sarawak independence. Subsequently the people of Sabah and Sarawak had made decision of self determination to join Malaysia.
9. According to UN Charter, once the people had exercised self determination, all previous historical events and status would become null and void. What is in force now is what is internationally recognized and recognized by the UN i.e Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Cobbold Commission which was even published in the Philippines Government Gazette.
www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1963/09/14/united-nations-malaysia-mission-report-final-conclusions-of-the-secretary-general-14-september-1963/
The last sentence of the report says "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia"
10. On the issue of payment of 'rent", it was officially called "cession money" not "rent". In Manila Accord meeting the descendent of Sulu sultan requested through Manila for Malaysia to continue paying what was left by the British. Malaysia agreed to continue paying even though she was not obligated to pay, with condition that Sulu should not make any physical claim. If Sulu breach the condition then the agreement would be null and void. And it was called "cession money" but in actuality it was merely "consolation money". But to use the term "consolation" was felt to be too degrading, thus the term "cession money" was continually used as used by the British before.
11. Why Malaysia was not obligated to pay. Because as had been explained above, once the people of these territories had exercised self determination to join Malaysia, according to UN Charter, all previous historical events and status would become null and void.
12. When Sulu breached the condition by sending armed men to Lahad Datu to claim Sabah in 2013, Malaysia stopped the payment.
tama ka trish riippi.. MABUHAY KA!! SULTAN JAMALAUL KIRAM III..
Sometime in history, an Austrian business man made a deal with the Sultan to lease the land to him and the Sultan agreed. From the Austrian it was passed on to his business partner, a British. From the British business man, it was passed on to the British North Borneo Company. And from the company it was passed on to the British crown as Protectorate without the knowledge and consent of the Sultan of Sulu. And later on it was passed on to Malaysia. THEY STILL PAY THE LEASE UP TO THIS DAY.
Not fully true. Sulu only claimed that Sabah was given by Brunei to Sulu as a gift. But Brunei refuted this claim and denied ever having given Sabah to Sulu. There was no document regarding the transfer of ownership of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans.
It was a historical fact that on 29 December 1877, Sultan of Brunei ceded the whole of Sabah to BNBC and concurrently appointed Baron Von Overback, the co-owner of BNBC as Maharajah of Sabah and Rajah of Sandakan and Gaya.
When BNBC went to Sabah to start their business, Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu. BNBC agreed to enter a "pajak" agreement with Sulu after they were advised by their fellow businessmen in Hong Kong who advised that Sulu would attack them if they didn't have a deal with Sulu. This "pajak' agreement was signed on 22 January 1878. BNBC and early generation of Sulu considered "pajak" in the agreement as "cession". But only later generation of Sulu claimed that it was "lease" or "rent". These led to an overlapping issue for BNBC.
However on 22 July 1878, the Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory.
Then in 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. Even though Britain had full control of Sabah, they still honoured the annual cession money payment to Sulu on good will. So did Malaysia when Sabah became a component state, Malaysia still honoured the annual cession money payment as consolation for the Sultan of Sulu.
The payment was stopped in 2013 after the Sabah standoff incident where the so called "Royal Sulu Security Force" infiltrated Sabah and occupied a village in Lahad Datu.
Kayang kaya bawiin ang Sabah kong ang tropa ni Abdul kiram walang tangke at jetfighter napasok nila ang Sabah.
Dapat talagang mabawi ang sabah, at mailagay sa ayos ang pag aari ng Pilipinas. Sana makialam ang UN sa isyu na ito
UN? The UN had already made decision and stand that Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Malaysia Mission. The last sentence of the report says:
"I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia".
DAPAT PO
Bawiin at ngayon na!!!
Mga kapatid kunting tiis lang, makukuha na yan balik at magiging Sabah,Philippines or Sabah, Republic of Maharlika .
BAWIIN NA ANG SABAH!!!
Tama k kuya tunying mabuhay k
Atin ang sabah!
Sana magpakalat ang government natin ng mga evidences na ang sabah ay sa philippines! at sana ituro din ito sa mga schools natin para alam ng mga kabataan!
Correct. Must show proof and evidences.
OMG 69,000 PHP for 1 year?
wagna natin I mention or ungkatin Ang history, sultan ng sulu, sultan ng Brunei,government, politics at iba pa.. Ang pag-usapan natin ngayon yung situation, live situation or yung present..important and history(past) pero mas important ang future.. Ang dapat na mag desisyon Jan yung mga taong nakatira sa sabah, pinanganak, lumaki at nanirahan Jan sa sabah since ninuno pa nila.. Sila ang mas may karapatan mag desisyon sa lupa at tahanan nila.. Kung gusto nila maging Philippines ok, kung gusto nila maging malaysia ok din.. Depends on them.. Ksi yung pinag-aawayan ang may mga taong naninirahan doon, hindi gubat at hindi or isang isla na walang katao-tao.. Let them choose.. And diba its a gift daw.. So pwede rin namang bawiin ng Brunei ulit ang sabah mas gugustuhin pa ng mga local citizen yon.. Kasi Islam country ang gusto nila at katahimikan..Actually ang need na I consider ng government ng both country yung kapakanan ng mga tao.. Saan nila papupuntahin ang thousands of people in sabah?? Masakit mawalan ng tirahan, at kung tirahan na yun ay full of memories ng mga past or ng mga yumaon na.. Hindi pwedeng basta2 itapon ang thousands of people doon parang mga basura lang..
This exactly what I'm talking .. Totoo ang sinabi mo . Sabah native people are kadazan dusun dayak murut and there is identity of mummers (described as Chinese) ..
It depends on which history and written by who.
1. Philippines wants to claim Sabah because she claims that Sabah belonged to Sulu and Sulu as part of Philippines had given Manila right to claim Sabah.
2. Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu because Brunei had given Sabah (actually only eastern part of Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for helping Brunei to fight and defeat rebels.
3. But Brunei refuted and denied having given eastern part of Sabah to Sulu. Yes Brunei did promise to give eastern part of Sabah to Sulu if Sulu help Brunei to fight and defeat rebels. But Sulu didn't come to help, or they came too late after Brunei had already defeated the rebels by themselves. So according to Brunei, eastern part of Sabah had NOT been given to Sulu. When Sulu soldiers returned to their Sultan they reported that they had helped Brunei defeating the rebels, they dared not telling the truth. So Sulu Sultan thought and assumed that eastern part of Sabah had been given to him. But there was no document signed by both Sultans regarding the transfer of ownership of eastern part of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu.
4. When Brunei ceded Sabah to NBCC, it was the WHOLE of Sabah, showing that Brunei still owned the whole of Sabah. This cession agreement between Brunei and NBCC was documented.
5. When NBCC went to Sabah to do their business, Sulu Sultan claimed that eastern part of Sabah was under Sulu. So NBCC had to make a deal with Sulu Sultan just so that they could do their business. This deal wether it was a lease, rent or cession was documented.
6. BUT STILL THERE WAS NO DOCUMENT OF TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF SABAH FROM BRUNEI TO SULU SIGNED BY BOTH SULTANS.
7. Then NBCC transfered Sabah to the British government because NBCC couldn't afford to rebuild Sabah after WW2. This transfer was based on the fact that the whole of Sabah had been ceded by BRUNEI to NBCC, not by Sulu. It was up to NBCC to transfer Sabah to any other entity.
8. The British government then gave Sabah and Sarawak independence. Subsequently the people of Sabah and Sarawak had made decision of self determination to join Malaysia.
9. According to UN Charter, once the people had exercised self determination, all previous historical events and status would become null and void. What is in force now is what is internationally recognized and recognized by the UN i.e Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Cobbold Commission which was even published in the Philippines Government Gazette.
www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1963/09/14/united-nations-malaysia-mission-report-final-conclusions-of-the-secretary-general-14-september-1963/
The last sentence of the report says "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia"
10. On the issue of payment of 'rent", it was officially called "cession money" not "rent". In Manila Accord meeting the descendent of Sulu sultan requested through Manila for Malaysia to continue paying what was left by the British. Malaysia agreed to continue paying even though she was not obligated to pay, with condition that Sulu should not make any physical claim. If Sulu breach the condition then the agreement would be null and void. And it was called "cession money" but in actuality it was merely "consolation money". But to use the term "consolation" was felt to be too degrading, thus the term "cession money" was continually used as used by the British before.
11. Why Malaysia was not obligated to pay. Because as had been explained above, once the people of these territories had exercised self determination to join Malaysia, according to UN Charter, all previous historical events and status would become null and void.
12. When Sulu breached the condition by sending armed men to Lahad Datu to claim Sabah in 2013, Malaysia stopped the payment.
13. On the issue of leasing agreement between NBCC and Sulu Sultan, it was "cession agreement" not "leasing agreement".
dahil cguro wlng ginwa si pinoy sa sabah dahil noung kapanahonan pa ng ama at ina nia bago namatai sa malisya nag tungo at nag.tago ang kanya ama bago umuwe ng pinas!!
Laban nlang tyong lahat🇵🇭.. ☝️Wy na in tiyagarad pa🙉
bkt sabah Malaysia..
e Philippines sabah yan aahh..
dpt nmg tlga saatin yan aahh..
dpt bawain ng Philippines government ang sabah pra d tayo crowded sa bansa ntg. puro inankin ang part ng Philippines e
oo dapat.
IMPEACH c PNOY!!!!
No more aquino in election time
Yes thanks atin yan ibalik yo yan sa manga pilipino kung ayaw cge laban tayong lahat OK Muslim Christian mag kasama kaming lalaba para sa atin lahat
We need Duterte for this. Where is the Filipino spirit?! Sabah, Philippines.
san na si dutete? nahulog sa jetski?
Ahahaha wala si duterte busy sa Bff niya China
Philippines:
Can't stop Commie insurgency
Can't stop chaos in Mindanao
Can't stop China in SCS
Also Philippines:
Let's take Sabah, hope we win this time.
😂🤣😅😆
This issue should be tackled in a proper forum to resolve the issue between the Philippines and Malaysia in order not to result in bloody encounter.
How come sultan sulu want to claim sabah when they even ruled by phillipine govt and can't even get indipendence from phillipine to become an independent nation. court of Justice are only recognize claim made by sovereign country and not by the the self proclaim sultan's which kingdom is no more exist in this modern world
Very true.
Since Sulu is part of the Philippines, gusto nila na ang Sabah ay magIng part of the
PHILIPPINES din.
@@ofiepidel2067 , Philippines CLAIMS Sabah on the basis that Sabah was CLAIMED to be once under Sulu. Descendent of Sulu sultan CLAIMED that Sabah was given by Brunei to Sulu as a gift. But Brunei refuted this claim and denied ever having given Sabah (actually only eastern part of Sabah) to Sulu. There was NO DOCUMENT regarding the transfer of ownership of eastern part of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans.
Sulu and subsequently Philippines never owned eastern part of Sabah from the very start.
Yes dapat bawiin
Unless the one who will lead our country Philippines will not value the blood of our ancestors and his heart is apart to defend our nation, Philippines in the future will be owned by foreign people. Wake up Philippines! Look Israel! They defend their nation for they value what God was given to them. It is not we want a war, but it is about how we value of what our ancestors given to us. Either your muslim or christian, our blood are they same. Do not let the invaders succeed and do not let them use religion to separate Pilipinos.
+Leah Caballero korak!
do u believe in palestinian genocide ?
Ipaglaban ang karapatan natin pilipino..sa atin yan..saba Philippines..
The agreement between Sultan Sulu and British North Borneo Company or BNBC on 22nd January 1878 involved only these two parties. On 22nd July 1878, Sultan Sulu relinquished his sovereignty on Sulu Archipelago and its dependencies thereof to Spain. On the same day, Sultan Sulu wrote to Governor General of Philippines and Governor of Sulu terminating the agreement between Sulu Sultanate and BNBC. The agreement between Sultan Sulu and BNBC on 22 January 1878 is null and void. On 24 July 1878 Governor of Sulu wrote to BNBC concerning the Spanish sovereignty on Sulu and its dependencies including North Borneo and the termination of the 1878 agreement between BNBC and Sultan Sulu. A letter was then written to the Spanish Government in Madrid and the issue was raised with the British Government. Finally, the issue on the agreement between Sultan Sulu and BNBC and the status of North Borneo was settled through the Madrid Protocol 1885. North Borneo belongs to the British under the Madrid Protocol. Again, on the 25th November 1957, the latter Sultanate of Sulu declared termination of the lease between Sulu and BNBC effective on 22 January 1958. Thus, the agreement is null and void twice. No payment is required as there is no new agreement. Earlier, the British (before formation of Malaysia) also do not have such an agreement. Malaysia is not responsible (like payment for cession/rent) as it does not involve (not exist prior to 1963) in any of the above agreement. Malaysia only make payment after the Manila Accord meeting in 1963 as requested by the Philippines Government. The token amount might be a gift to the Sultanate to cool down the situation. That is why the amount is ridiculously small in Malaysian dollar and not Mexican Gold Dollar used during that era (1878).
On 17th December 2002, in the case of ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan between Malaysia and Indonesia, ICJ make a decision rejecting Philippines intervention in the court case (historical and legal rights on North Borneo) on the ground that there is non-existence of an interest of legal nature. Attesting that the Bases of Peace and Capitulation agreement in 1878 between Spain and Sulu is definitive as Sultan of Sulu has definitively relinquished Archipelago of Sulu and its dependencies to Spain thus include North Borneo.
Feeling of defeatism kung ayaw nating bawiin ang north borneo!
Eh di mamatay ng dahil sayo na amin yan amin yang lupang yan!.. Giyera lang ang solution para mabawi yan..
Payag ako jan
Giyera solusyon? Kaya ba ntin labanan sa giyera ang Britain at USA ? Pwede kung aarmasan tyo ng Russia at China
Dapat po manindigan ang Philippine Govt.na basin ang Sabah...kung talagang sa Pilipinas ito by hook or by crook...kung do makukuha sa diplomasyang usapan...
Ang pagkakaalam ko ang saba ay kay delima😂
😆 🤣 😂
Bawiin na natin ung SABAH hanggat buhay pa ung mga matandang saksi na atin ung Sabah.
Sabah is owned by the Sultanate of Sulu! Papers and history is on the Sultanate of Sulu and Philippines.
Then give independence to Sultanate of Sulu then let them claim Sabah. Malaysia doesn't negotiate with a Sultan that doesn't have his own country, Sulu is now part of the Philippines, your Sultan is just only a PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL with government recognition due to his ceremonial royal title.
Give Sulu independence then we will talk. For now, it's either on Malaysia or Brunei (very first owner) hand.
Oo dapat
Believe talaga ako sa kababayan natin mga pilipino...
Never stop claiming our Sabah.. PILIPINAS is Sabah
Sabah, Malaysia, all UN countries recognize it as part of Malaysia, you can't fight the Commies, you can't fight China, now you gonna fight us cause we are "equal." Stop CLAIMING THE WHOLE WORLD!
The people of Sabah and Sarawak had made decision of self determination to join Malaysia. According to UN Charter, once the people of these territories had exercised self determination, all previous historical events and status would become null and void. What is in force now is what is internationally recognized and recognized by the UN, i.e Sabah and Sarawak are component States of Malaysia. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the UN Secretary General report on Cobbold Commission which was even published in the Philippines Government Gazette.
www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1963/09/14/united-nations-malaysia-mission-report-final-conclusions-of-the-secretary-general-14-september-1963/
The last sentence of the report says "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfilment as component States of Malaysia".
Dapat.
Spratley nga di masecure sabah pa kaya, magpalakas ng puwersa militar hinde para makipag geyera kundi ipakita na kaya natin
Give Sabah back to the rightful owner, the Sultanate of Sulu.
Yes! Will Impeach Pnoy a.k.a Noynoy Jr. A.
Tutulong po ang kanan mg katipunan sa Development ng lugar
Mr president handa ang kaban na tumulong sa kapatid
Nais kong maging parte ng peace
Para Ma protektahan ang mga kapatid
Ay OO NAMAN DHL TALAGANG SA PILIPINAS YAN AT MABUHAY
Yes
Dear LNG
Oo dapat bawiin
panahon ni panot ito...
kaya hkndi nabawi..
suportado ninpanot na hindi mabawi ang sabah
DAPAT LANG. IBALIK ANG SABAH. SA PILIPINAS DAHIL PAGAARI NG PILIINAS HISTORICAL NG SULTANATE OF SOLO SA ATING BANSANG SABAH PILIPINAS. SA ATING. PERLAS NG SILANGANAN..
Mababawi natin Sabah, gamitin Ng pamahalaan Ang pag alyansa sa us at japan... Makakatulong sa pagpapalakas Ng ating Bansa.. kailangan lumaban na tayo' hndi mananahimik Lang tayo' at ating pamahalaan.
We are tired to understand the greed of other nations. We Filipinos are givers to the needs of others. Now, it's high time to listen to SULTANATE which they have been understanding about the situation. We are ready to fight for our OURS...