Nice a match I can actually watch, with no cards in hand flicking, no touching lands every two secs, no holding the first land in front for a solid minute 🤣🤣
The right burn deck with a good pilot who knows how to play against daze, ya >> There's a reason why mono red deck wins burn DOES NOT get new cards from Wizards, and it's not just a bias for blue >>> Red is THE best color, Lightning Bolt THE best card. Burn's problem is it is underplayed and players do not experiment enough with the basic list >> if you had as many burn players as you did delver, storm, reanimator, etc., those decks would statistically hit top 8's and win big tourneys much much more, but it is underplayed in the USA ... There are a lot more burn players in Japan and because they make up more of a percentage of the format out there you regularly see burn decks top 8'ing and winning bigger tourneys.
I love it how Commander players never talk trash about any other format at least I've never heard them.. but people who play every format other than Commander always talk trash about it.
They can't trash talk about other formats coz they've never played them I also dispute that claim, plenty of commander players I've met, whenever I try to get them to try cEDH, pauper, whatever, manage to summon some disdain 🤣
@@milesstevenson1858 ya but most spoiled people don't know how to appreciate shit so. I love all formats and I didn't grow up spoiled, I know how to appreciate anything and everything
@@tonyt4764 I definitely agree though, plenty of magic players do s*** on other formats for like, no reason You're allowed to not like a format and not be an ass about it at the same time 🤣
Yes because T1 combo kills, cheating in Emrakuls or reanimating atraxa is "earning your win" Burn is more fair and harder to play in a format where combo is so streamlined due to fast mana and free interaction that you can barely call it skill outside mulligan decisions, and that was made easier with the london rule.... Even control decks are now easy mode value engines due to beanstalk letting force of will draw you 4 cards into 1 mana catchall removal spells that draw you 4 cards into a one ring.
@@Blacksunstoneful with all the decks you can play in legacy and the reason why u play burn, because it is "fair" and money isnt the factor? like you can own any cars you like and u choose a a honda cilvic? come on lets me reason here.
legacy is an high end format. people showing up in unique and expensive deck and you're playing burn because its "your play style". come on bro just say you dont have money to play real legacy cards. and that 10000% okay not everyone have few grands to buy cardboards deck. but dont lie to yourself and other making up excuse because you like "burn deck". if money isnt that factor you would still play a $100 burn deck in legacy. if that is you then youre unique youre, 3 people out of 3 billions
>> Some players commenting that you need eidolon or pillar to win this matchup >>>> THAT is VERY incorrect (graveyard removal is WAY better, more important, and versatile against other decks too) >>> Storm basically has NOTHING against burn, its a pure race, there is no removal, no counters, no big dudes, maybe they hit a card with discard, but meh. >> The play is to clock them with a turn 3 or turn 4 kill, and also either have main deck/sb cards against them, like mindbreak trap. But even a trap isnt as good as just a turn 3 take 20.
>>> OK... Thinking you can or should play sheoldred in this kind of burn deck is just >>> This guy loses all respect lol. Not that you cant actually make a Red Black burn deck that is FUCKING AWESOME, but this ....WTF how are you gonna cast that without dark rits? and if you add dark rits OK now you can and should use some good black cards too along with that...
FN >>>>>>>>> as a burn player i'm glad he lost >>> WTF >>> NO mind break trap, no leylines. uses something USELESS like sheoldred. Im gonna flip my shit!>>> 4 traps, 4 leylines, RED DECK WINS >>> ugh. lol Good Job Bryant.
That Bryant Cook sure is somethin'!
Has his own playlist! Bryant Cook on 90s MTG archive: ua-cam.com/play/PLakHnJvOjoOcgmi2PoLNYt-fQiMmkEMsF.html
He should really make a UA-cam channel
Bryant always Cooking up an epic Storm
Love theepicstorm and 90smtg! This is amazing!
At last! Bryant Cook archive: ua-cam.com/play/PLakHnJvOjoOcgmi2PoLNYt-fQiMmkEMsF.html
Those tokens are so nice, where can I get them?
One of the best fan-made token packs in my opinion: www.theepicstorm.com/product/mini-token-combo-pack/
-Chris
Good clean Magic, what a thing of beauty
I love it. -Chris
Certainly one of the matches of all time.
Wow!
Always nice to see bryant playin. What a beautiful deck
Agreed!
That was something else ^^
Showing off.
Power of the flanno shirt:)
Exactly.
Nice a match I can actually watch, with no cards in hand flicking, no touching lands every two secs, no holding the first land in front for a solid minute 🤣🤣
F
Whoa!
Burn? In legacy?
Some people want to burn.
The right burn deck with a good pilot who knows how to play against daze, ya >> There's a reason why mono red deck wins burn DOES NOT get new cards from Wizards, and it's not just a bias for blue >>> Red is THE best color, Lightning Bolt THE best card.
Burn's problem is it is underplayed and players do not experiment enough with the basic list >> if you had as many burn players as you did delver, storm, reanimator, etc., those decks would statistically hit top 8's and win big tourneys much much more, but it is underplayed in the USA ... There are a lot more burn players in Japan and because they make up more of a percentage of the format out there you regularly see burn decks top 8'ing and winning bigger tourneys.
end step brainstorm is a typical tes play, burn players sit down lol
We joke that end step Brainstorm is strictly a misplay, but this was fine.
I love it how Commander players never talk trash about any other format at least I've never heard them.. but people who play every format other than Commander always talk trash about it.
They can't trash talk about other formats coz they've never played them
I also dispute that claim, plenty of commander players I've met, whenever I try to get them to try cEDH, pauper, whatever, manage to summon some disdain 🤣
Fwiw, I absolutely love cEDH, but I've tried most traditional formats
@@milesstevenson1858 ya but most spoiled people don't know how to appreciate shit so. I love all formats and I didn't grow up spoiled, I know how to appreciate anything and everything
@@milesstevenson1858 and I love cedh, just suck at at 🤣🤣🤣
@@tonyt4764 I definitely agree though, plenty of magic players do s*** on other formats for like, no reason
You're allowed to not like a format and not be an ass about it at the same time 🤣
no foil duals, 🤣🤣🤣🤣
C'mon Bryant!
COOKSTER!!!!!!!!!!
TENDRILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TENDRILLS!!!!!!!!!!!
FOR THE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MMUCH THANKS!!!!!!!
PLAYERS1/2!!!!!!!!!!!
THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLAUERS OREGON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FOR THE UP !!!!!!!!!
@@90sMTG :)
anyone playing legacy burn is because they dont want to sit and earn their wins or they dont have money to play legacy cards
Yes because T1 combo kills, cheating in Emrakuls or reanimating atraxa is "earning your win"
Burn is more fair and harder to play in a format where combo is so streamlined due to fast mana and free interaction that you can barely call it skill outside mulligan decisions, and that was made easier with the london rule....
Even control decks are now easy mode value engines due to beanstalk letting force of will draw you 4 cards into 1 mana catchall removal spells that draw you 4 cards into a one ring.
Haha ok kid.
@@rgw0n344 if youre poor just say so.
@@Blacksunstoneful with all the decks you can play in legacy and the reason why u play burn, because it is "fair" and money isnt the factor? like you can own any cars you like and u choose a a honda cilvic? come on lets me reason here.
legacy is an high end format. people showing up in unique and expensive deck and you're playing burn because its "your play style". come on bro just say you dont have money to play real legacy cards. and that 10000% okay not everyone have few grands to buy cardboards deck. but dont lie to yourself and other making up excuse because you like "burn deck". if money isnt that factor you would still play a $100 burn deck in legacy. if that is you then youre unique youre, 3 people out of 3 billions
>> Some players commenting that you need eidolon or pillar to win this matchup >>>> THAT is VERY incorrect (graveyard removal is WAY better, more important, and versatile against other decks too) >>> Storm basically has NOTHING against burn, its a pure race, there is no removal, no counters, no big dudes, maybe they hit a card with discard, but meh. >> The play is to clock them with a turn 3 or turn 4 kill, and also either have main deck/sb cards against them, like mindbreak trap. But even a trap isnt as good as just a turn 3 take 20.
Interesting.
>>> OK... Thinking you can or should play sheoldred in this kind of burn deck is just >>> This guy loses all respect lol. Not that you cant actually make a Red Black burn deck that is FUCKING AWESOME, but this ....WTF how are you gonna cast that without dark rits? and if you add dark rits OK now you can and should use some good black cards too along with that...
Calm down.
@@90sMTG I'm just sayin man lol. He loses ALL respect 😘
FN >>>>>>>>> as a burn player i'm glad he lost >>> WTF >>> NO mind break trap, no leylines. uses something USELESS like sheoldred. Im gonna flip my shit!>>> 4 traps, 4 leylines, RED DECK WINS >>> ugh. lol Good Job Bryant.
Wow!