Some of the comments to this video had links to pornography websites. I reported it and it appears (at least from my side) that UA-cam has removed it, but I don't trust the algorithm to do it for all viewers. TO THE HANAFI FIQH CHANNEL, PLEASE TURN OFF COMMENTS. Edited part: please up-vote this comment by giving it a like, so that the sheikh can see and address this problem.
Turning off comments is not a good idea... Cause comments let people ask questions or concerns or write their understanding of the video subject to the sheikh... Plus turning off comments can make people think that the channel is afraid to see people's responses... Im pretty sure there are other better actions that can be taken to solve this problem... Plus this issue is a constant problem in youtube nowadays... May Allah grant us true understanding of matters and grant us guidance to truth. Ameen.
"Saved me" .. Aren't you being a bit over-the-top? As a human being, you are coerced to use your reason. The only instances someone would NOT use their aql is if they are CLINICALLY INSANE, INTOXICATED OR MENTALLY DISABLED SUCH AS AUTISM.
As a human being, you are coerced to use your reason. Of course one would need sight to notice the sun. IT IS BLATANTLY OBVIOUS. The actual funny thing that Yasir is exaggerating a normal, healthy human function. IT IS AS IF YASIR IS SAYING HE DOESNT THINK AT ALL!!! The only instances someone would NOT use their aql is if they are CLINICALLY INSANE, MENTALLY DISABLED SUCH AUTISM OR INTOXICATED.
JazakAllah Molana, Kindly finish of the Salah Series Also, pls start some series stuff like Dr. YQ Hardly any English content by Ahnaaf, hence people have no choice but to listen to salafeez This vaccum needs filling.... For Allah's sake, Do something....people are deserted... JazakAllah
There is a lot of attacking against ashari these days subhannallah when most of the scholars previously were asharite, as the sheikh said a blind person will not see the benefit or wisdom behind the sun shine
I propose Hanafi and Maliki solidarity 😂 Because I benifit so much from this Channel lol.. And we actually think the same way about many things. I don't know if I would call myself Ash'ari but I definitely don't agree with the things Atharis say
You'll be surprised, we agree on more things than we disagree. Also this whole salafi, wahabi or" Qur'an and Hadith" voices are a big illusion or Mirage. We are the real inheritors of islamic history the ahlus sunnah (all 4 madahib and as for aqeeda the ashari and maturidi mix) the others are fringe, hanging upon hanbali fringe opinions. We need to stand up and take back center stage and unite despite our petty differences. That's what we as ummah lack desparately! A centralised Islam with acceptable variations in practices which all agree to be correct and mutually coexist. Or else we now what's happening in Indonesia, china and other countries where common muslims are being misguided. May Allah unite the ummah again.ameen
@@Det.Ash12 I agree, I especially like the way certain Hanafi Shouyoukh talk about certain matters. Of course I still gravitate more to Malikiyyah when we begin to diverse but I found your traditions to bevery thoughtful and wise, even the way this Sheykh explained the difference between "sahih Hadith" and the Sunnah was very beautiful. By the way can I ask, what do you guys think about the traditions of Ahlu'l Medina which was established by the Prophet SAWS in Yathrib? I think thats really the only difference is that we take them to be expressions of the Sunnah too like Malik would use them as evidences in the Muwatta to balance against certain Hadith that reached him for example when he didnt implement the Hadith about cleaning the bowl 7 times from which a dog ate from etc.. Do you think that should be used? Maybe I should wait to ask a Alim but Im just curious
@@yazirrpeerbuccas3566 But even in how we describe what the Sunnah is Hanafiyyah and Malikiyyah are the most similar tbh and in other ways. Im not degrading Shafi'is at all Im just saying the Hanafis, at least from the Indian subcontinent, they please me more when I hear them talk about all matters
@@nadjiguemarful which country are you ? You can find Good shaafii scholars maybe in malaysia but countries like indonesia who are mainly shafii in fiqh but their aqeedah is garbage( shirk , bidaah etc) but there are some upon haq even there. Even the hanafis, not all of hanafis have sound aqeedah like in my country some of the barelwis say they are maturidis but their aqeedah is far from it.
Whose aql? Ash'ari differed from ibne kullab! Ibne Faurak differed from Baaqilaani! Raazi differed from Ghazaali Aamdi differed from Raazi! So which aql is a parameter for understanding the Qur'an and sunnah? The truth is that Aql can only lead you to the affirmation of maghbiyaat (the unseen) but it has no way to establish or even interpreted the unseen except for what is mandated by clear and evident text of revelation! The aql has no role is judging the text in matters of unseen like the attributes of Allah and its like . Wallahu A'lam bis sawaab.
Jazakallahu khair.The four madhad are all actually authentic but in our subcontinent,its not practiced the way it should be.The Iman and Aqida of Imam Hanifa RA. is actually authentic and he was also against any Shirk and Bid'ah.May Allah not keep us undivided Amin!
Ya sheikh, you dint use your intellect to understand aqeedah, or any text, you use the understating of the prophet sallahu alayhi wasallam and the companions as this what Allah commanded us to do, if you use your intellect to understand texts that opens doors to misinterpreting, misunderstanding and changing meanings of ayat and hadeeth by following whatever your mind tells you!
Short and sweet, Masha Allaah. May Allaah preserve the Shaykh and give him the time to upload more. Ameen. The ummah is surely very thirsty in this area.
All this is a no-brainer. No pun intended. As a human being, you are coerced to use your reason. Of course one would need sight to notice the sun. IT IS BLATANTLY OBVIOUS. The instances where someone would NOT use their aql is if they are CLINICALLY INSANE, MENTALLY DISABLED SUCH AS AUTISM OR INTOXICATED.
@Bitter Truth Keep your insecure child-like manly stupidity to yourself. *** Provide any evidence ASHARIS (A SCHOLAR, NOT A LAYMAN) who refuted Ibn Taymiyyah. You probably never read his books in Arabic. You are FORCE-FED ALL YOUR INFORMATION FROM MUQALLID SCHOLARS!!! WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM WITH IBN TAYMIYYAH!!!???
@@Hashim_Naysapuri Fair enough, but writing books doesn't mean the other arguments were smashed. It just means books were written like thousands upon hundreds of thousands of others. And Allah knows best.
Imam Abu Haneefah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Allah has a Hand, a Countenance and an Essence as He, may He be exalted, mentioned in the Qur’an. Whatever Allah, may He be exalted, has mentioned in the Qur’an of His having a Countenance, Hand and Essence, these are attributes of His which we affirm without discussing how. It cannot be said that His Hand is His power or blessings, because that is denying the attribute, and is the view of the Qadaris and Mu‘tazilah. Rather His hand is a divine attribute, and we do not discuss how it is; His wrath and His pleasure are divine attributes, and we do not discuss how they are. End quote from *Fiqh al-Akbar*, with commentary by Mullah ‘Ali al-Qaari, p. 85. How is this interpreted brothers
we just don't know what Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is saying when he talks about his hand in the Qur'an. the true meaning is only known to Him. we shouldn't anthropomorphise Him.
As Salamu 'Alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu, first thing we must understand regarding Allah ta'ala is that kayfiyyah (howness or modality) don't apply to Allah ta'ala. To say that we don't discuss or know the how it to confirma kayf (how) to Allah ta’ala, which is ilhad (blasphemy) that we call Takyeef. Moreover know without a doubt that the dhahir ma'na (literal or apparent meaning) of yad (hand) are: organ; body part; or appendage. Those literal meanings are unbefitting to be Attributed to Allah ta'ala. To Attributed those meanings to the Attribute of Yad (Hand) to Allah ta’ala is tashbeeh (liken Allah ta’ala to His Creation) & tajseem (attributing bodily attributes), which are also ilhad (blasphemy). Kno that this is the belief & methodology of the Mushabihah & Mujassimah to accept the literal or apparent meaning to the Attribute of Yad (Hand) & other Attributes. May Allah ta'ala allow us to benefit from this understanding. Ameen
Following your intellect when it comes to the textural evidneces is following your desires as you are just interpreting it however your mind understands it which is incorrect
@@theeski1994 Literal interpretation is not always correct. The context and logic is very important. Because of some stupid literal interpretation, Bin Baz claimed that the sun revolved around the earth and declares people an infidel.
@@theeski1994 All scholars understand text the way their minds understand it. Why don't you accuse them of following their whims and desires? Your logic is flawed because you think using your mind only means following your whims. If that were the case, Allah wouldn't have told us to think and ponder and reflect repeatedly in the Quran.
@@blackflag6976 Yes sometimes there is literal meaning and a metaphorical meaning when it comes to the texts but that is for the scholars from the early generations to determine as they took it directly from the prophrt or the companions, that's not the issue, the brother i responded to said the mind is preferred over the text, which is a belief that came from greek philosophers like aristotle who are kuffar, after the prophet and companions time and is not from Islam,
@@ILoveMaths07 Yes Allah did command us to ponder over the Qur'an, but that is over its apparent meaning and not try to give it it's own tafsir with our mind, if there is an ayah we don't understand we go back to the tafsirs that the scholars have already written , not just interpret it how we feel like it, interpretation of the Qur'an is done through having a strong grasp of Arabic, understating the Qur'an and hadith and take their understaing back to the companions and early generations as they took their understating of the Qur'an directly from the prophet sallahu alayhi wasallam, so this is for the scholars to do, ibn katheer, al qurtubi, tabari and others who have already written tafsirs, Allahu a'lam
According to whom? The Pseudo-Salafis? Majority of the great scholars of Khalaf were Asha'ari and Maturidi and you Salafis depend on their works in all Islamic sciences yet you say they are not Ahlu Sunnah? The joke is on you because Hanbalis today who are Athari will tell you Salafis are not Ahlu Sunni nor Athari.
They are all the same sect: Ahle Sunnah wal Jama'ah. They differ on minor issues based on their methodology of how they analyse the hadith with single narrators etc. They even studied under each other. Imam Malik for example gave precedence to the practices of the scholars of Madinah even over Sahih Hadith because he was alive in the time of the Sahabah RA and the people of who saw the Sahabah RA. His thinking was that since it had only been 50 years since the passing of the Prophet SAW, the people of Madinah were still following and doing what they had seen the Sahabah RA doing, so he gave precedence to their practice. One of his teachers was the slave of Abdullah ibn Abbas RA. Imam Shafi, Imam Hanbal gave preference to Sahih Hadith even if they contradicted each other. They said that a person can follow one of those hadiths one day, and another hadith the next day and gain reward for both as long as they were both Sahih (authentic). Imam Abu Hanifah said that we need to look at ALL the hadiths on a certain topic and try to figure out what the overall rulings are rather than looking at each hadith separately. Remember this is only on those hadiths that have just one narrator or the hadiths that go against majority of narrations. The 4 Imams agreed on the basic fundamentals and differed on 'minor issues'. Each one has hadiths to backup their rulings. May Allaah reward them for their service to the deen of Islam.
@@Alam22414 A person is still a Muslim even if he doesn't follow any Imam. I follow Imam Abu Hanifa RA. I am Hanafi alhamdulillaah. We follow an Imam because they have already looked at the hadiths and the life of the Prophet SAW and the Sahaba RA etc and figured out all the rules for what is the best way to do wudu, read Salah, keep Roza, do Hajj, give charity, do qurbani, do funeral, get married etc according to the way of Prophet SAW. For example what makes wudu break, what makes roza break, what makes Salah invalid etc. A person who is not a scholar must follow an Imam because it is very difficult for a normal person to figure all this out on their own. If a person tries to figure everything out on their own, they can get confused. For example in Bukhari Sharif there is hadith which mention Prophet SAW stood up and did urine. Also there are hadith in Bukhari which say he read Salah with shoes on. However, if somebody try to go in Masjid with shoes on they will get beaten up. Same we should sit down and do toilet. We know the standing up is special situation, same with wearing shoes in Salah etc.
@@bittertruth6575 Imam Hanifa followers put their hands under the navel during prayers, I used to do that. When I read the Sahih Hadith which says above the navel under the chest area so I followed. Now my local Imam tells me, either I follow Hanfi completely or follow Shafi. All my Hanfi friends started calling me Wahabi and started telling me their is another mosque for you kind. I feel like non Muslim
@@Alam22414 You should not just pick up a hadith book and follow any hadith you see when it comes to acts of ibadah. Just because something is in hadith, doesn't mean you have to do it. This is why it is so dangerous. Tell me do you stand up and do urination? Do you read Salah with shoes on? Why not? Brother it is ok to put your arms wherever you feel comfortable, below the navel, on the navel, above the navel but if you make a habit to just pick up a hadith book and follow it, you will get confused, not just in this thing but other things as well. let me give you an example from Bukhari Sharif 3 hadiths about wudu: 1. BUKHARI HADITH: Volume 1, Book 4, Number 159: Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas: The Prophet performed ablution by washing the body parts only ONCE. 2. BUKHARI HADITH: Volume 1, Book 4, Number 160: Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zaid: The Prophet performed ablution by washing the body parts TWICE. 3. BUKHARI HADITH: Volume 1, Book 4, Number 196: Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zaid: Once Allah’s Apostle came to us and we brought out water for him in a brass pot. He performed ablution thus: He washed his face THRICE, and his forearms to the elbows twice, then passed his wet hands lightly over the head from front to rear and brought them to front again and washed his feet (up to the ankles). The Sahih hadith above look like they contradict each other. How are we supposed to know which one to follow? Should we just pick whichever one we like and ignore the others?
The fact mawlana uses verse or verses shows why the kuffar of today still refer to the Quran as a Book of poetry and our Nabī صلى الله عليه وسلم a poet. Although there are plethora of Āyāt suggesting otherwise, so rather than using superfluous words mawlana which isn’t going to change your IQ level nor make you sound intelligent. Keep it simple and use terminologies that have been derived from the Quran and Sunnah and stop confusing the Muslims. Also, I sincerely hope you’ve changed yourself by having better akhlaq and adab whereas before you came across aggressive and condescending, let’s see how long this demeanour remains.
As a human being, you are coerced to use your reason. Of course one would need sight to notice the sun. IT IS BLATANTLY OBVIOUS. The only instant someone would NOT use their aql is if they are CLINICALLY INSANE, INTOXICATED OR MENTALLY DISABLED SUCH AS AUTISM.
@Slave of Allah Ok, Wahabi! Nice insult, very original. Did you ask Yasir to help you with that?!!! 🙄 Everyone knows if you have a mental disorder or disability then your aql is deficient!!! If you studied Islam, you would know that aql is one of the conditions for becoming a muslim, not to mention salah among other things!!!
@Slave of Allah Possibly, you have lost the remainder of your aql. Perhaps a checkup at a psychiatrist is needed. A psychotic break is probably imminent.
Salam, the question that is commonly asked to the ashairah is, when the aql and naql go against one another, which one do we give preference to. Please answer the questions that are asked and don’t try to hide from them.
aql doesnt contradict naql . as naql tells you to use aql . Surely the worst of beasts in God’s sight are those that are deaf and dumb and do not reason. (8:22)
You already know the answer to such a heavily loaded and dumb question. Ahle Sunnah ALWAYS use aql in SUPPORT of naql and never against it. Stop trying to play word games. Before the pseudo Salafi 'students of knowledge' came along, the giants of this Ummah had already explained the naql in terms of the aql. There's nothing for you guys to do. LOL. Just shut up and sit down.
That's what he said if you didn't understood it. He said a blind cannot appreciate the sunlight meaning there's a need to maintain healthy eyesight to appreciate sunlight or anything else. Same way we need sound reasoning to understand and implement the Noor of scripture. Scripture is perfect not our reason. Thats why they both are interdependent on eachother to guide. Hence there's no questioning for the insane and the immature kids who died young because of no or under developed intellect. Wallahu Alam.
@Black Flag You shouldn't say anything SINCE YOU YOURSELF CANT VERIFY IT when your information is not even secondhand. Did you go into space and see the orbit yourself? DIDNT THINK SO.
Brother, respectfully, you are deceiving your audience You do in fact use aql over revelation because you use your aql to disable the attributes of Allah عز و جل, and empty the meanings. These are matters of the unseen and have no room for interpretation. The most important knowledge in Sharia is the knowledge of Allah عز و جل , and you do not affirm all of them The believers put revelation over their aql, because they are believers. This is a very serious matter. If you are sincere, and it seems you are, then affirm the attributes of Allah عز و جل, and leave the mistakes of any elders who have made erroneous claims. No person after Muhammad ﷺ is masoom, and correcting a mistake of any person afterwards is no disrespect to them
@@-Ahmed8592 Do you affirm that Allah عز و جل is above His Throne, and that the heavens will be rolled in His Right Hand, and the Earth will be within His grip?
@@MM-mc8hs Allah also says in The Quran: "those who were blind in this life will be blind in the Hereafter, and even further off the path." But the meaning of the ayah is completely different. It's not about literally being blind. It's about being blind to the truth! Imagine if a righteous person is blind in this world and wakes up blind in the next! That makes no sense whatsoever. May Allah guide me, May Allah guide you.
@@MM-mc8hs Hadith says two hands are right but also mentions left hand. And you do taweel of right and say it means blessed. It is not as apparent as you make it out to be. We do affirm these attributes. But we don't affirm the literal dictionary definition of the main usage (ie organs). And about reason, do you not use reason to understand Quran? What I mean is that when you see plural first person in regards to Allah, don't you say it can't be plural of number since Allah is one? You see christians gave up their reason and as a result made up the trinity. Their bible teaches one God. But their mind thought it is no contradiction to accept Isa (as) God and yet believe in one God.
@@skadezy8487 Again, do you affirm that Allah عز و جل is above His Throne, and that the heavens will be rolled in His Right Hand, and the Earth will be within His grip? On what basis are you interpreting the meaning of the ayaat that mention the attributes of Allah عز و جل? Do you believe that Allah عز و جل is the All-Seeing? Do you believe that Allah عز و جل actually sees? Do you believe that Allah عز و جل has Hands? Do you believe that Allah عز و جل has actual Hands? Do you believe that Allah عز و جل is actually above His Throne?
Don’t fabricate statements in this shameless manner. To reduce a highly technical and intricate issue to this concocted statement and then attribute it to an entire educational seminary, not even a singular individual, is sufficient evidence of our own intellectual deficiency
@@theversifier "...The reality is that some scholars of Deoband were asked, “Can Allah lie?” They explained that Allah never lies. Allah Himself has said in the Quran: “Who is more true in statement than Allah?” (Qur'an 4:87) Allah doesn’t need to lie. He is not scared of anyone nor does he need to please anyone so that he would tell a lie. He has instructed us to speak the truth at all times, so why would he do the opposite? Thereafter they explained that Allah has the power to do whatever he wants. So if he wanted to lie, nobody can stop him. No one can take that power away from him. There is a difference between “Allah does lie” and “Allah can lie.” So people who don’t like the scholars of Deoband mix both things and say that they believe that Allah does lie. Be careful of the deceit of such misleading people.” Source: The official website of Darulifta Birmingham
@@theversifier "... الحاصل امکانِ کذب سے مراد دخولِ کذب تحتِ قدرتِ باری تعالیٰ ہے یعنی ﷲ تعالیٰ نے جو وعدہ وعید فرمایا ہے اس کے خلاف پر قادر ہے اگرچہ وقوع اس کا نہ ہو امکان کو وقوع لازم نہیں بلکہ ہو سکتا ہے کہ کوئ شے ممکن بالذات ہو اور کسی وجہِ خارجی سے اس کو استحالہ لاحق ہوا ہو چنانچہ اہلِ عقل پر مخفی نہیں پس مذہب جمیع محققین اہلِ اسلام و صوفیاۓ کرام و علماءِ عظام کا اس مسئلہ میں یہ ہے کہ کہ کذب داخلِ تحتِ قدرتِ باری تعالیٰ ہے"۔ -فتاویٰ رشیدیہ
@@Husayn0318 either you can’t read or you’re a charlatan. The Urdu statement says that what is intended by saying Imkan al-Kidhb entering under the Qudrah of Allah is that Allah has the intrinsic ability to act contrary to His threat/promise if He so wishes HOWEVER WE KNOW THAT THIS CAN NEVER OCCUR! How different this is from what you initially wrote. Also, the fact that you reduced that one passage to a single sentence solidifies my point that you reduced the matter to a meagre few words without due justice and that alone is proof of your mischief.
Some of the comments to this video had links to pornography websites. I reported it and it appears (at least from my side) that UA-cam has removed it, but I don't trust the algorithm to do it for all viewers. TO THE HANAFI FIQH CHANNEL, PLEASE TURN OFF COMMENTS.
Edited part: please up-vote this comment by giving it a like, so that the sheikh can see and address this problem.
Turning off comments is not a good idea... Cause comments let people ask questions or concerns or write their understanding of the video subject to the sheikh... Plus turning off comments can make people think that the channel is afraid to see people's responses... Im pretty sure there are other better actions that can be taken to solve this problem... Plus this issue is a constant problem in youtube nowadays... May Allah grant us true understanding of matters and grant us guidance to truth. Ameen.
Brother trust me you have saved me. May Allah save you on the day of judgement.
"Saved me" .. Aren't you being a bit over-the-top?
As a human being, you are coerced to use your reason. The only instances someone would NOT use their aql is if they are CLINICALLY INSANE, INTOXICATED OR MENTALLY DISABLED SUCH AS AUTISM.
the funny thing is that the people who say that revelation > reason came to that conclusion by using reason.
As a human being, you are coerced to use your reason. Of course one would need sight to notice the sun. IT IS BLATANTLY OBVIOUS.
The actual funny thing that Yasir is exaggerating a normal, healthy human function. IT IS AS IF YASIR IS SAYING HE DOESNT THINK AT ALL!!!
The only instances someone would NOT use their aql is if they are CLINICALLY INSANE, MENTALLY DISABLED SUCH AUTISM OR INTOXICATED.
Have you never read the quran?
JazakAllah Molana,
Kindly finish of the Salah Series
Also, pls start some series stuff like Dr. YQ
Hardly any English content by Ahnaaf, hence people have no choice but to listen to salafeez
This vaccum needs filling....
For Allah's sake, Do something....people are deserted...
JazakAllah
Under rated comment
Hope Mawlana takes notice
He probably won't finish it because many of the ahadith are weak which cannot be used for shariah rulings.
@@diyaa_ulqamar says the infamous abridged classifications of Psuedo Muhadith Lilbani 🌵
@@diyaa_ulqamar
Lol....typical Salafi logic....
@Waqar Aijaz
Your own scholars say weak ahadeeth can ONLY be used for fadaail al-a'maal, NOT shariah rulings.
Typical muqallid!!!
Walaikum assalam, Bruh how do manage to stay inactive for so long? Keep uploading regularly
Need more and more videos like this. Please keep uploading more videos to keep the beautiful channel active.
There is a lot of attacking against ashari these days subhannallah when most of the scholars previously were asharite, as the sheikh said a blind person will not see the benefit or wisdom behind the sun shine
I propose Hanafi and Maliki solidarity 😂 Because I benifit so much from this Channel lol.. And we actually think the same way about many things. I don't know if I would call myself Ash'ari but I definitely don't agree with the things Atharis say
You'll be surprised, we agree on more things than we disagree. Also this whole salafi, wahabi or" Qur'an and Hadith" voices are a big illusion or Mirage. We are the real inheritors of islamic history the ahlus sunnah (all 4 madahib and as for aqeeda the ashari and maturidi mix) the others are fringe, hanging upon hanbali fringe opinions. We need to stand up and take back center stage and unite despite our petty differences. That's what we as ummah lack desparately! A centralised Islam with acceptable variations in practices which all agree to be correct and mutually coexist. Or else we now what's happening in Indonesia, china and other countries where common muslims are being misguided. May Allah unite the ummah again.ameen
@@Det.Ash12 I agree, I especially like the way certain Hanafi Shouyoukh talk about certain matters. Of course I still gravitate more to Malikiyyah when we begin to diverse but I found your traditions to bevery thoughtful and wise, even the way this Sheykh explained the difference between "sahih Hadith" and the Sunnah was very beautiful. By the way can I ask, what do you guys think about the traditions of Ahlu'l Medina which was established by the Prophet SAWS in Yathrib? I think thats really the only difference is that we take them to be expressions of the Sunnah too like Malik would use them as evidences in the Muwatta to balance against certain Hadith that reached him for example when he didnt implement the Hadith about cleaning the bowl 7 times from which a dog ate from etc.. Do you think that should be used? Maybe I should wait to ask a Alim but Im just curious
The four schools of fiqh mainly differ in fiqh. Thats all. Our aqeedah is more or less the same
@@yazirrpeerbuccas3566 But even in how we describe what the Sunnah is Hanafiyyah and Malikiyyah are the most similar tbh and in other ways. Im not degrading Shafi'is at all Im just saying the Hanafis, at least from the Indian subcontinent, they please me more when I hear them talk about all matters
@@nadjiguemarful which country are you ?
You can find Good shaafii scholars maybe in malaysia but countries like indonesia who are mainly shafii in fiqh but their aqeedah is garbage( shirk , bidaah etc) but there are some upon haq even there. Even the hanafis, not all of hanafis have sound aqeedah like in my country some of the barelwis say they are maturidis but their aqeedah is far from it.
Alhamdulillah. Thank you for this clarity. May Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala reward you all for this channel and the knowledge you give.
Whose aql?
Ash'ari differed from ibne kullab!
Ibne Faurak differed from Baaqilaani!
Raazi differed from Ghazaali
Aamdi differed from Raazi!
So which aql is a parameter for understanding the Qur'an and sunnah?
The truth is that Aql can only lead you to the affirmation of maghbiyaat (the unseen) but it has no way to establish or even interpreted the unseen except for what is mandated by clear and evident text of revelation! The aql has no role is judging the text in matters of unseen like the attributes of Allah and its like .
Wallahu A'lam bis sawaab.
Jazakallahu khair.The four madhad are all actually authentic but in our subcontinent,its not practiced the way it should be.The Iman and Aqida of Imam Hanifa RA. is actually authentic and he was also against any Shirk and Bid'ah.May Allah not keep us undivided Amin!
Use the aqal in the context of Qur'an and SUNNAH!! And not using stupid pagan greek philosophy
Ya sheikh, you dint use your intellect to understand aqeedah, or any text, you use the understating of the prophet sallahu alayhi wasallam and the companions as this what Allah commanded us to do, if you use your intellect to understand texts that opens doors to misinterpreting, misunderstanding and changing meanings of ayat and hadeeth by following whatever your mind tells you!
Short and sweet, Masha Allaah. May Allaah preserve the Shaykh and give him the time to upload more. Ameen. The ummah is surely very thirsty in this area.
@@diyaa_ulqamar You forgot arrogant, stubborn and full of hatred all of which can also lead to one not using aql :)
All this is a no-brainer. No pun intended.
As a human being, you are coerced to use your reason. Of course one would need sight to notice the sun. IT IS BLATANTLY OBVIOUS.
The instances where someone would NOT use their aql is if they are CLINICALLY INSANE, MENTALLY DISABLED SUCH AS AUTISM OR INTOXICATED.
We need more channels like these
Wa alaykumassalam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh
Why am I being censored? Are the muqallids scared of criticism?
You are a Muquallid of your own Shaykh.
Alaikum salam wa rahmatulah. wa barallahufik akhi al karim!
Ibn taymiyyah smashed asharites on this matter
Where , when and how ?
and he got smashed in return
@Bitter Truth
Keep your insecure child-like manly stupidity to yourself.
*** Provide any evidence ASHARIS (A SCHOLAR, NOT A LAYMAN) who refuted Ibn Taymiyyah. You probably never read his books in Arabic. You are FORCE-FED ALL YOUR INFORMATION FROM MUQALLID SCHOLARS!!!
WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM WITH IBN TAYMIYYAH!!!???
@@markward3981 Ibn Taymiyyah wrote two books. al-Ta'sis fi Radd Asas al-Taqdis and Bayan Talbis al-Jahmiyya.
@@Hashim_Naysapuri
Fair enough, but writing books doesn't mean the other arguments were smashed. It just means books were written like thousands upon hundreds of thousands of others. And Allah knows best.
Imam Abu Haneefah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Allah has a Hand, a Countenance and an Essence as He, may He be exalted, mentioned in the Qur’an. Whatever Allah, may He be exalted, has mentioned in the Qur’an of His having a Countenance, Hand and Essence, these are attributes of His which we affirm without discussing how. It cannot be said that His Hand is His power or blessings, because that is denying the attribute, and is the view of the Qadaris and Mu‘tazilah. Rather His hand is a divine attribute, and we do not discuss how it is; His wrath and His pleasure are divine attributes, and we do not discuss how they are.
End quote from *Fiqh al-Akbar*, with commentary by Mullah ‘Ali al-Qaari, p. 85.
How is this interpreted brothers
we just don't know what Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala is saying when he talks about his hand in the Qur'an. the true meaning is only known to Him. we shouldn't anthropomorphise Him.
@@hasakicioguz9312 but didnt you just anthropomorphise Him by saying he has a hand. You said 'his hand'?
As Salamu 'Alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu, first thing we must understand regarding Allah ta'ala is that kayfiyyah (howness or modality) don't apply to Allah ta'ala. To say that we don't discuss or know the how it to confirma kayf (how) to Allah ta’ala, which is ilhad (blasphemy) that we call Takyeef.
Moreover know without a doubt that the dhahir ma'na (literal or apparent meaning) of yad (hand) are: organ; body part; or appendage. Those literal meanings are unbefitting to be Attributed to Allah ta'ala. To Attributed those meanings to the Attribute of Yad (Hand) to Allah ta’ala is tashbeeh (liken Allah ta’ala to His Creation) & tajseem (attributing bodily attributes), which are also ilhad (blasphemy). Kno that this is the belief & methodology of the Mushabihah & Mujassimah to accept the literal or apparent meaning to the Attribute of Yad (Hand) & other Attributes. May Allah ta'ala allow us to benefit from this understanding. Ameen
Beautifully put.
Well said Sheikh
Absolutely perfectly true
Salam Sheikh
But isnt Allah beyond our comprehension?
Ibn Masood (R. A.):"The Throne is above the water and Allaah is above the Throne, and none of your deeds are concealed from Him"
ponder and Reflect upon the creation, but do not reflect upon the essence of the Creator.
Beautifully phrased, but don't be scared or ashamed to say that the mind is preferred over the text! 'Mind' is not the same as whims and desires.
Following your intellect when it comes to the textural evidneces is following your desires as you are just interpreting it however your mind understands it which is incorrect
@@theeski1994 Literal interpretation is not always correct. The context and logic is very important.
Because of some stupid literal interpretation, Bin Baz claimed that the sun revolved around the earth and declares people an infidel.
@@theeski1994 All scholars understand text the way their minds understand it. Why don't you accuse them of following their whims and desires? Your logic is flawed because you think using your mind only means following your whims. If that were the case, Allah wouldn't have told us to think and ponder and reflect repeatedly in the Quran.
@@blackflag6976
Yes sometimes there is literal meaning and a metaphorical meaning when it comes to the texts but that is for the scholars from the early generations to determine as they took it directly from the prophrt or the companions, that's not the issue, the brother i responded to said the mind is preferred over the text, which is a belief that came from greek philosophers like aristotle who are kuffar, after the prophet and companions time and is not from Islam,
@@ILoveMaths07
Yes Allah did command us to ponder over the Qur'an, but that is over its apparent meaning and not try to give it it's own tafsir with our mind, if there is an ayah we don't understand we go back to the tafsirs that the scholars have already written , not just interpret it how we feel like it, interpretation of the Qur'an is done through having a strong grasp of Arabic, understating the Qur'an and hadith and take their understaing back to the companions and early generations as they took their understating of the Qur'an directly from the prophet sallahu alayhi wasallam, so this is for the scholars to do, ibn katheer, al qurtubi, tabari and others who have already written tafsirs, Allahu a'lam
Just a reminder ; achaîîra and maturid are not ahlo sunna ( followers of the prophet ) .
According to whom? The Pseudo-Salafis? Majority of the great scholars of Khalaf were Asha'ari and Maturidi and you Salafis depend on their works in all Islamic sciences yet you say they are not Ahlu Sunnah? The joke is on you because Hanbalis today who are Athari will tell you Salafis are not Ahlu Sunni nor Athari.
Which Sect should I follow Hanfi, Shafi, Malaki or Hanbali ?
They are all the same sect: Ahle Sunnah wal Jama'ah. They differ on minor issues based on their methodology of how they analyse the hadith with single narrators etc. They even studied under each other. Imam Malik for example gave precedence to the practices of the scholars of Madinah even over Sahih Hadith because he was alive in the time of the Sahabah RA and the people of who saw the Sahabah RA. His thinking was that since it had only been 50 years since the passing of the Prophet SAW, the people of Madinah were still following and doing what they had seen the Sahabah RA doing, so he gave precedence to their practice. One of his teachers was the slave of Abdullah ibn Abbas RA. Imam Shafi, Imam Hanbal gave preference to Sahih Hadith even if they contradicted each other. They said that a person can follow one of those hadiths one day, and another hadith the next day and gain reward for both as long as they were both Sahih (authentic). Imam Abu Hanifah said that we need to look at ALL the hadiths on a certain topic and try to figure out what the overall rulings are rather than looking at each hadith separately. Remember this is only on those hadiths that have just one narrator or the hadiths that go against majority of narrations. The 4 Imams agreed on the basic fundamentals and differed on 'minor issues'. Each one has hadiths to backup their rulings. May Allaah reward them for their service to the deen of Islam.
@@bittertruth6575 Which one you follow? Do you have to any Imam to be a Muslim?
@@Alam22414 A person is still a Muslim even if he doesn't follow any Imam. I follow Imam Abu Hanifa RA. I am Hanafi alhamdulillaah. We follow an Imam because they have already looked at the hadiths and the life of the Prophet SAW and the Sahaba RA etc and figured out all the rules for what is the best way to do wudu, read Salah, keep Roza, do Hajj, give charity, do qurbani, do funeral, get married etc according to the way of Prophet SAW. For example what makes wudu break, what makes roza break, what makes Salah invalid etc. A person who is not a scholar must follow an Imam because it is very difficult for a normal person to figure all this out on their own. If a person tries to figure everything out on their own, they can get confused. For example in Bukhari Sharif there is hadith which mention Prophet SAW stood up and did urine. Also there are hadith in Bukhari which say he read Salah with shoes on. However, if somebody try to go in Masjid with shoes on they will get beaten up. Same we should sit down and do toilet. We know the standing up is special situation, same with wearing shoes in Salah etc.
@@bittertruth6575 Imam Hanifa followers put their hands under the navel during prayers, I used to do that.
When I read the Sahih Hadith which says above the navel under the chest area so I followed.
Now my local Imam tells me, either I follow Hanfi completely or follow Shafi. All my Hanfi friends started calling me Wahabi and started telling me their is another mosque for you kind. I feel like non Muslim
@@Alam22414 You should not just pick up a hadith book and follow any hadith you see when it comes to acts of ibadah. Just because something is in hadith, doesn't mean you have to do it. This is why it is so dangerous. Tell me do you stand up and do urination? Do you read Salah with shoes on? Why not?
Brother it is ok to put your arms wherever you feel comfortable, below the navel, on the navel, above the navel but if you make a habit to just pick up a hadith book and follow it, you will get confused, not just in this thing but other things as well. let me give you an example from Bukhari Sharif 3 hadiths about wudu:
1. BUKHARI HADITH: Volume 1, Book 4, Number 159:
Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
The Prophet performed ablution by washing the body parts only ONCE.
2. BUKHARI HADITH: Volume 1, Book 4, Number 160:
Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zaid:
The Prophet performed ablution by washing the body parts TWICE.
3. BUKHARI HADITH: Volume 1, Book 4, Number 196:
Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zaid:
Once Allah’s Apostle came to us and we brought out water for him in a brass pot. He performed ablution thus: He washed his face THRICE, and his forearms to the elbows twice, then passed his wet hands lightly over the head from front to rear and brought them to front again and washed his feet (up to the ankles).
The Sahih hadith above look like they contradict each other. How are we supposed to know which one to follow? Should we just pick whichever one we like and ignore the others?
The fact mawlana uses verse or verses shows why the kuffar of today still refer to the Quran as a Book of poetry and our Nabī صلى الله عليه وسلم a poet. Although there are plethora of Āyāt suggesting otherwise, so rather than using superfluous words mawlana which isn’t going to change your IQ level nor make you sound intelligent. Keep it simple and use terminologies that have been derived from the Quran and Sunnah and stop confusing the Muslims.
Also, I sincerely hope you’ve changed yourself by having better akhlaq and adab whereas before you came across aggressive and condescending, let’s see how long this demeanour remains.
Aql(Intellect) is the biggest Bounty of Allah ta'la even higher in status than Arsh (Throne) of Allah ta'la and Kalm(Pen) & Lawh.(Tablet)
As a human being, you are coerced to use your reason. Of course one would need sight to notice the sun. IT IS BLATANTLY OBVIOUS.
The only instant someone would NOT use their aql is if they are CLINICALLY INSANE, INTOXICATED OR MENTALLY DISABLED SUCH AS AUTISM.
@@diyaa_ulqamar said a Wahhabi
@Slave of Allah
Ok, Wahabi! Nice insult, very original. Did you ask Yasir to help you with that?!!! 🙄
Everyone knows if you have a mental disorder or disability then your aql is deficient!!! If you studied Islam, you would know that aql is one of the conditions for becoming a muslim, not to mention salah among other things!!!
@@diyaa_ulqamar studied Islam from Victorian sources 🌵
@Slave of Allah
Possibly, you have lost the remainder of your aql. Perhaps a checkup at a psychiatrist is needed. A psychotic break is probably imminent.
Salam, the question that is commonly asked to the ashairah is, when the aql and naql go against one another, which one do we give preference to. Please answer the questions that are asked and don’t try to hide from them.
aql doesnt contradict naql . as naql tells you to use aql .
Surely the worst of beasts in God’s sight are those that are deaf and dumb and do not reason. (8:22)
You already know the answer to such a heavily loaded and dumb question. Ahle Sunnah ALWAYS use aql in SUPPORT of naql and never against it. Stop trying to play word games. Before the pseudo Salafi 'students of knowledge' came along, the giants of this Ummah had already explained the naql in terms of the aql. There's nothing for you guys to do. LOL. Just shut up and sit down.
You should give preference to logic over the text! Otherwise you'll end up understanding the text incorrectly!
like what isis did.
Or like what Bin Baz did when he said the Sun goes around the earth.
That's what he said if you didn't understood it. He said a blind cannot appreciate the sunlight meaning there's a need to maintain healthy eyesight to appreciate sunlight or anything else. Same way we need sound reasoning to understand and implement the Noor of scripture. Scripture is perfect not our reason. Thats why they both are interdependent on eachother to guide. Hence there's no questioning for the insane and the immature kids who died young because of no or under developed intellect. Wallahu Alam.
@Black Flag
You shouldn't say anything SINCE YOU YOURSELF CANT VERIFY IT when your information is not even secondhand. Did you go into space and see the orbit yourself? DIDNT THINK SO.
Brother, respectfully, you are deceiving your audience
You do in fact use aql over revelation because you use your aql to disable the attributes of Allah عز و جل, and empty the meanings. These are matters of the unseen and have no room for interpretation.
The most important knowledge in Sharia is the knowledge of Allah عز و جل , and you do not affirm all of them
The believers put revelation over their aql, because they are believers. This is a very serious matter.
If you are sincere, and it seems you are, then affirm the attributes of Allah عز و جل, and leave the mistakes of any elders who have made erroneous claims. No person after Muhammad ﷺ is masoom, and correcting a mistake of any person afterwards is no disrespect to them
We do affirm the attributes
@@-Ahmed8592
Do you affirm that Allah عز و جل is above His Throne, and that the heavens will be rolled in His Right Hand, and the Earth will be within His grip?
@@MM-mc8hs Allah also says in The Quran:
"those who were blind in this life will be blind in the Hereafter, and even further off the path."
But the meaning of the ayah is completely different. It's not about literally being blind. It's about being blind to the truth!
Imagine if a righteous person is blind in this world and wakes up blind in the next! That makes no sense whatsoever.
May Allah guide me,
May Allah guide you.
@@MM-mc8hs
Hadith says two hands are right but also mentions left hand. And you do taweel of right and say it means blessed. It is not as apparent as you make it out to be.
We do affirm these attributes. But we don't affirm the literal dictionary definition of the main usage (ie organs).
And about reason, do you not use reason to understand Quran? What I mean is that when you see plural first person in regards to Allah, don't you say it can't be plural of number since Allah is one? You see christians gave up their reason and as a result made up the trinity. Their bible teaches one God. But their mind thought it is no contradiction to accept Isa (as) God and yet believe in one God.
@@skadezy8487
Again, do you affirm that Allah عز و جل is above His Throne, and that the heavens will be rolled in His Right Hand, and the Earth will be within His grip?
On what basis are you interpreting the meaning of the ayaat that mention the attributes of Allah عز و جل?
Do you believe that Allah عز و جل is the All-Seeing? Do you believe that Allah عز و جل actually sees?
Do you believe that Allah عز و جل has Hands? Do you believe that Allah عز و جل has actual Hands?
Do you believe that Allah عز و جل is actually above His Throne?
"It is rationally possible for Allah to lie."
-Dar al-'Uloom Deoband
Don't talk about the intellect when you're devoid of it in the first place.
Don’t fabricate statements in this shameless manner. To reduce a highly technical and intricate issue to this concocted statement and then attribute it to an entire educational seminary, not even a singular individual, is sufficient evidence of our own intellectual deficiency
@@theversifier
"...The reality is that some scholars of Deoband were asked, “Can Allah lie?” They explained that Allah never lies. Allah Himself has said in the Quran: “Who is more true in statement than Allah?” (Qur'an 4:87)
Allah doesn’t need to lie. He is not scared of anyone nor does he need to please anyone so that he would tell a lie. He has instructed us to speak the truth at all times, so why would he do the opposite? Thereafter they explained that Allah has the power to do whatever he wants. So if he wanted to lie, nobody can stop him. No one can take that power away from him. There is a difference between “Allah does lie” and “Allah can lie.” So people who don’t like the scholars of Deoband mix both things and say that they believe that Allah does lie. Be careful of the deceit of such misleading people.”
Source: The official website of Darulifta Birmingham
@@theversifier
"... الحاصل امکانِ کذب سے مراد دخولِ کذب تحتِ قدرتِ باری تعالیٰ ہے یعنی ﷲ تعالیٰ نے جو وعدہ وعید فرمایا ہے اس کے خلاف پر قادر ہے اگرچہ وقوع اس کا نہ ہو امکان کو وقوع لازم نہیں بلکہ ہو سکتا ہے کہ کوئ شے ممکن بالذات ہو اور کسی وجہِ خارجی سے اس کو استحالہ لاحق ہوا ہو چنانچہ اہلِ عقل پر مخفی نہیں پس مذہب جمیع محققین اہلِ اسلام و صوفیاۓ کرام و علماءِ عظام کا اس مسئلہ میں یہ ہے کہ کہ کذب داخلِ تحتِ قدرتِ باری تعالیٰ ہے"۔
-فتاویٰ رشیدیہ
@@theversifier Read the works of your "scholars".
@@Husayn0318 either you can’t read or you’re a charlatan. The Urdu statement says that what is intended by saying Imkan al-Kidhb entering under the Qudrah of Allah is that Allah has the intrinsic ability to act contrary to His threat/promise if He so wishes HOWEVER WE KNOW THAT THIS CAN NEVER OCCUR!
How different this is from what you initially wrote. Also, the fact that you reduced that one passage to a single sentence solidifies my point that you reduced the matter to a meagre few words without due justice and that alone is proof of your mischief.