I love how you manage to perfectly demonstrate fundamental physics concepts in a way that most school demos have trouble with. The fact that it's all a simulation means you can remove unnecessary variables like friction, and tweak things like wave speed. It's awesome.
@@WajihaHaleema-bk8xq 1 out of 5 stars, plot was dry and characters were underdeveloped and behaved nonsensically. Wouldn't recommend. Teletubbies is more engaging.
The fundamentals of this channel are amazing, crisp and clear. And by interpreting them into such amazing videos shows how deeply you understand physics.
the same happens with the high frequency electrical signal. can u make a video on that it will be amazing to watch and help in learning microwave communication theory.
I love your videos, as many times you explain things at a molecular level, and explain WHY it happens. Can you please elaborate on those aspects ? This one feels procedural.
You can derive it from Newton's 3 laws of motion if you model the rope as a series of masses connected to each other by springs. The different materials could have different mass densities.
Dude!!! I have to write it once again!!! Your videos are awesome!!! Excellent job!!! One more thing: THAAAANK YOU for this channel and for your videos!!! Quality of your materials is EXCEPTIONAL!!! High educational value!!! 😀👍
I work in electric power distribution and we have to sometimes place extra lightning arresters at the end of power lines due to the wave doubling effect at the velocity = 0 boundary. When lightning strikes a power line it creates a traveling wave along the line that reflects at the end and creates huge voltages.
Actually, it is the open boundary where the voltage is double. By the way, the equations are different for electric transmission lines. I have a video on transmission lines at ua-cam.com/video/ozeYaikI11g/v-deo.html
Some sources claim that the group velocity of a light wave can exceed the speed of light. Although I understand that this doesn’t violate causality or the transmission of information, it would be helpful if you could make a full video explaining this, as many people use it to argue against Einstein's theory of relativity. Thank you Eugene!
I may make a video on that topic. This is discussed in the following link. Thanks. physics.stackexchange.com/questions/6912/in-superluminal-phase-velocities-what-is-it-that-is-traveling-faster-than-light
Beautiful video. At 11:40, shouldn’t it be reflected amplitude - initial amplitude = transmitted amplitude? Also if I stack up 3 materials one after another with v1=1, v2= 10 and v3=100, would I be able to cascade the equations to get a final amplitude of (2 * 10 / (10 + 1)) * (2 * 100/ (100+ 10) = 4 * 10/11 * 100/110 = 4 * 100/121 = 3.27 or do the waves and its reflections interfere, hence changing altering equation and we get a much lower value (lower than 2). I believe the equation above comes from the tension equation (balanced forces at each point in the material) along with conservation of energy!
The equation in the video is correct. One way to see this is by thinking about the example where the reflected amplitude is zero (V1=V2). In this case, the initial amplitude should equal the transmitted amplitude, as is shown in the equation in my video. By contrast, in the equation you wrote, you have transmitted amplitude = -initial amplitude. As for your second question, if you stack up materials as you describe, you can get an amplitude in the final material more than double that of the initial wave.
Было бы круто увидеть серию визуализаций взаимодействия электрона атома с порцией эл-маг волны на основе модели дипольного излучения/переизлучения, когда первичная порция проходит, раскачивая электрон, но следующая за ней порция с запаздыванием начинает складываться с переизлученной электроном порцией. в нескольких вариантах сочетаний частот проходящих и переизлученных волн. И следом уже взаимодействие плоского тонкого слоя атомов с плоской проходящей волной, как складываются волны от нескольких электронов в плоскости, порождая замедление групповой скорости (иллюзия замедления эл-маг волны в среде). Ну и добить визуализацией с толстым слоем. Это даст относительно наглядное представление, чем "свет", как образ нашего мозга в ответ на обработку распределения проинтерферированной напряжённости поля, отличается от реальной эл-маг волны, как он отражается от плоской "зеркальной" поверхности и от неровной поверхности, почему для света существуют кажущиеся нам законы отражения и преломления (замедления света) в веществе keep doing cool things! thank You! 🎉
Reflection is key. 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ "Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart and soul's fate revealed. In time, all points converge; hope's strength resteeled. But to earn final peace at the Universe's endless refrain, we must see all in nothingness... before we start again." 🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨ -- Diamond Dragons (series)
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I would like to watch a 3D animated explanation from this cannel on the controversial video by Veritasium on how Energy flow in a Circuit.
I can visualise this how pulse wave form transmission from arterial structure to arteriolar wave form with different pulse wave velocities .Reflected wave is transmitted to the closed aortic valve at one end and Arteriolar network in other end with arterial structure in between
Does this apply to photons even though they move at relativistic speeds? I would have expected that, if we have the wavefunction of an individual photon as the wave, that the part reflected vs transmitted would be like, the superposition of whether or not it was reflected, But, in that case, I would expect the squares of the amplitudes to add to the square of the original amplitude (the squares of the amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted parts being the probability of it being observed to have been reflected or transmitted respectively), rather than the amplitudes adding to the original amplitude? Maybe this only applies in the situation with a large number of photons? Like, if the amplitude isn’t the probability amplitude, but the photon number or something? Am I making a silly mistake? Uh, if we have a Bosonic Fock space and for the single particle, in state psi_1 , uh, U(psi_1) = sqrt(p) psi_2 + sqrt(1-p) psi_3 (with psi_2 and psi_3 being orthogonal states) Then, the analogous thing to U with domain the Fock space, would send the vector with N copies of psi_1 to… uhh… Well, the N copies of psi_1 can be obtained by the N-th power of the creation operator for psi_1 , applied to the vacuum vector.. and then, F(U) (a_1^*)^N Omega = (F(U) a_1^* F(U)^*)^N F(U) Omega which is probably = (F(U) a_1^* F(U)^*)^N Omega ? which is maybe (sqrt(p) a_2^* + sqrt(1-p) a_3^*)^N Omega ? Which seems like it would be… well, the a_2^* and a_3^* should commute with each-other due to it being the Bosonic Fock space, so, should be like, sum_{k=0}^N binom(N,k) sqrt(p^k (1-p)^{N-k} ) (a_2^*)^k (a_3^*)^{N-k} Omega Which, wait, that isn’t properly normalized because the binomial coefficient would get squared… uhh… I made a mistake… If N is large… I guess the variance in “how many are reflected” only grows as sqrt(N) , and so the variance in the fraction that are reflected goes as sqrt(1/N) , and so goes to zero as N goes to infinity. Hm. I don’t know relativistic QFT. I guess for non-relativistic quantum mechanics, I can’t really have the wave speed be independent of the frequency… can I? Not for a free particle in any case… (Though, presumably something similar should be true for phonons, and those don’t have relativistic speeds, so, it should be possible to relate what is described here to a limit of a large number of phonons?) Ok, yeah, while I imagine that what is described in the video probably applies to light, I don’t know how to relate it to a quantum mechanical picture.
No, tunneling has to do with the energy level of the barrier vs the energy of the wave. I have a video on Quantum Tunneling at ua-cam.com/video/RF7dDt3tVmI/v-deo.html
Is this related to whips in any way? Like how the end of a whip can go supersonic? The end of the whip is not fixed, wouldn't that result in double amplitude at the end?
Hello, could you please share which software you use to make these videos. Am planning on learning blender for 3d software simulations. Any suggestions will help..
By the way, is there any explanation on why during the scenario where the middle wave have velocity of 1 and the flank waves have velocity of 2, only the first reflection is flipped upside down?
@@WajihaHaleema-bk8xq Allah said the in the quraa قُلْ أَبِاللَّهِ وَآيَاتِهِ وَرَسُولِهِ كُنْتُمْ تَسْتَهْزِئُونَ لَا تَعْتَذِرُوا قَدْ كَفَرْتُمْ بَعْدَ إِيمَانِكُمْ [التوبة:66]. they will surely say, "We were only conversing and playing." Say, "Is it Allah and His verses and His Messenger that you were mocking?"9:66 Make no excuse; you have disbelieved after your belief. surah Tawbah aya 66 mocking something like that might lead to Kufr; in short, no, I wasn't mocking.
You can derive it from Newton's 3 laws of motion if you model the rope as a series of masses connected to each other by springs. The different materials could have different mass densities.
I was thinking of longitudinal waves through a solid material. If you have a gas, such as air, and a vacuum, then what would happen is that all of the gas will escape into the vacuum, with or without a wave.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I thought so too. I suppose sound waves do behave similar to the ones in your video when they pass through mediums with different density or pressure. In the limit, where one medium has zero density, all reflections seize
Please help!!! The cubic root of 1 is -0.5 + 0.86602540378444 i Time slows by 50% (-0.5) when traveling at 86.60254037% the speed of light! It's also the cosine of 30 Does anyone want to tell me what's going on here?
You can derive it from Newton's 3 laws of motion if you model the rope as a series of masses connected to each other by springs. The different materials could have different mass densities.
When unabsorbed heat singularities strike resistance lights up the mass, it strikes like a filament vibration. Lightning is rapid heat loss striking atmospheric gasses lighting up surrounding atmospheres from instantaneously disolving internal magnetic fields grounding currents through its nucleus or core where external heat energy force is strongest as external heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable heat energy when absorbed into internal magnetic fields. Unabsorbed instantaneously disolving internal magnetic fields as external heat energy force of pressure as fire lines in the sky like forest fires. Waves crash the beach or rocks with overspray. Electricity is rapid heat exchanging through mass as grounding currents into earth's internal magnetic field. When heat can't rise above the cold atmospheric gasses, it condensates. Heat tunnels through the eye of the storm until pressure is equalization to magnetism centrifugal force cycling circulation within and without entanglement of magnetic fields as external heat energy singularities within and without entanglement of internal magnetic fields grounding currents through its nucleus or core where force is strongest around it. Hurricanes and tornadoes spinning all external heat energy faster than normal momentum of space itself. Centrifugal force within and without mass equalization of pressure. Heat cycling circulation patterns around cold repulsion of space as the nucleus neutralized repulsion within mass as outward force of pressure. Hurricanes and tornadoes are outward force of pressure in repulsion to cold space itself within and without entanglement of internal and external magnetic fields like black holes. External magnetic fields spinning around these monopoles of pure cold repulsion within the nucleus or core where external heat force is stronger at the event horizon perimeter. Tornadoes and hurricanes work as magnetic fields. Magnetism explains everything about physics.
This reads I think like the result of clanging disorder? I’m not a doctor, so I can’t evaluate that with confidence though? Maybe ask someone you know irl and who you trust, whether what you wrote in your comment, makes sense to them.
For waves on transmission lines, this treatment is not correct. Wave velocity mismatches don’t matter - impedance mismatches do. Two cables with different velocity factors but same impedance will have no reflection at their union.
I knew that someone bring this up, which is why I stated in the video that these equations are different for transmission lines. This is written at the bottom of the screen at 10 minutes and 10 seconds into the video. I have a separate video for transmission lines at ua-cam.com/video/ozeYaikI11g/v-deo.html
@@EugeneKhutoryansky You are right Sir, people who don't like to watch educational videos with intense background noise are not eligible to watch videos on this channel.
I love how you manage to perfectly demonstrate fundamental physics concepts in a way that most school demos have trouble with. The fact that it's all a simulation means you can remove unnecessary variables like friction, and tweak things like wave speed. It's awesome.
Thanks.
This person should stop making these stuff and Instead start making monologues on Islam to spread the word of the only true God.
No its not awesome; it is just good. Only islam is wonderful. When you read the Quran you will love it.
@@WajihaHaleema-bk8xq 1 out of 5 stars, plot was dry and characters were underdeveloped and behaved nonsensically. Wouldn't recommend. Teletubbies is more engaging.
@@JivanPal What do you mean by all that ?
These waves are not complex - they keep it real.
Thanks for this new video.
Thanks!
The fundamentals of this channel are amazing, crisp and clear. And by interpreting them into such amazing videos shows how deeply you understand physics.
Thanks for the compliments.
I was SOOO ready for this new post.
Why don't you become a muslim?
Thank you for this great video!
I see that all that can explain how elastic collisions work!!!
I am glad you liked my video. Thanks.
the same happens with the high frequency electrical signal. can u make a video on that it will be amazing to watch and help in learning microwave communication theory.
I cover that in my video on Transmission Lines at ua-cam.com/video/ozeYaikI11g/v-deo.html
Fantastic and amazing, as always, love from Portugal!
Thanks!!
Благодарю за Ваши труды❤
Great animation demonstration. It help me study college physics. Love from China.😊
Thanks!
I’m studying radiation heat transfer and appreciate this video to help me better understand topics related to radiation !
Islam has become the fastest growing religion in Japan.
Your always fascinating ❤like vibrating nickel
Thanks.
Fascinating explanations along with excellent graphical representations!
Thanks.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky 👍
I love your videos, as many times you explain things at a molecular level, and explain WHY it happens. Can you please elaborate on those aspects ? This one feels procedural.
You can derive it from Newton's 3 laws of motion if you model the rope as a series of masses connected to each other by springs. The different materials could have different mass densities.
Dude!!! I have to write it once again!!! Your videos are awesome!!! Excellent job!!!
One more thing: THAAAANK YOU for this channel and for your videos!!! Quality of your materials is EXCEPTIONAL!!! High educational value!!!
😀👍
Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you like my videos.
Oh this video would've been clutch when I was just getting into ham radio.
Why don't you convert to Islam?
Nifty as always
Thanks.
I work in electric power distribution and we have to sometimes place extra lightning arresters at the end of power lines due to the wave doubling effect at the velocity = 0 boundary. When lightning strikes a power line it creates a traveling wave along the line that reflects at the end and creates huge voltages.
Actually, it is the open boundary where the voltage is double. By the way, the equations are different for electric transmission lines. I have a video on transmission lines at ua-cam.com/video/ozeYaikI11g/v-deo.html
Absolutely amazing, like always!
Thanks for the compliment.
Fantastic video, as always!
Thanks.
You are right Sir, people who don't like to watch educational videos with intense background noise are not eligible to watch videos on this channel.
Some sources claim that the group velocity of a light wave can exceed the speed of light. Although I understand that this doesn’t violate causality or the transmission of information, it would be helpful if you could make a full video explaining this, as many people use it to argue against Einstein's theory of relativity.
Thank you Eugene!
I may make a video on that topic. This is discussed in the following link. Thanks.
physics.stackexchange.com/questions/6912/in-superluminal-phase-velocities-what-is-it-that-is-traveling-faster-than-light
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you!!!!
Impedance matching go brrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Islam is the final religion.
My transmission lines class was a nightmare, old books with dense math and almost no visual aids. Wish I had this back then!
The equations are different for electric transmission lines. I have a video on transmission lines at ua-cam.com/video/ozeYaikI11g/v-deo.html
Beautiful video. At 11:40, shouldn’t it be reflected amplitude - initial amplitude = transmitted amplitude?
Also if I stack up 3 materials one after another with v1=1, v2= 10 and v3=100, would I be able to cascade the equations to get a final amplitude of (2 * 10 / (10 + 1)) * (2 * 100/ (100+ 10) = 4 * 10/11 * 100/110 = 4 * 100/121 = 3.27 or do the waves and its reflections interfere, hence changing altering equation and we get a much lower value (lower than 2).
I believe the equation above comes from the tension equation (balanced forces at each point in the material) along with conservation of energy!
The equation in the video is correct. One way to see this is by thinking about the example where the reflected amplitude is zero (V1=V2). In this case, the initial amplitude should equal the transmitted amplitude, as is shown in the equation in my video. By contrast, in the equation you wrote, you have transmitted amplitude = -initial amplitude. As for your second question, if you stack up materials as you describe, you can get an amplitude in the final material more than double that of the initial wave.
So awesome! 👍🏾
Thanks.
😰エジプト出身の私の友人の一人が仏教徒になりました。 彼はかつてイスラム教徒でした。😢 今、彼の命は危険にさらされています。彼は何をすべきでしょうか？
Cool physics sim. You should add a quarter wave transformer to show how it cancels reflections at the design frequency.
These things are worldly. Come to islam asap.
Wow really helpful! Can you also make a video about standing waves and SWR?
Standing waves are discussed at the end of my video "Phase Velocity versus Group Velocity"at ua-cam.com/video/EIqKG5TiSYs/v-deo.html
@2:41 sounds like super-conductivity
Thank you for explaining👍
You are welcome and thanks.
It's so good, thank you to sir.
Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.
Wow okay, you're good today
Ah, be good today
Было бы круто увидеть серию визуализаций взаимодействия электрона атома с порцией эл-маг волны на основе модели дипольного излучения/переизлучения, когда первичная порция проходит, раскачивая электрон, но следующая за ней порция с запаздыванием начинает складываться с переизлученной электроном порцией. в нескольких вариантах сочетаний частот проходящих и переизлученных волн. И следом уже взаимодействие плоского тонкого слоя атомов с плоской проходящей волной, как складываются волны от нескольких электронов в плоскости, порождая замедление групповой скорости (иллюзия замедления эл-маг волны в среде). Ну и добить визуализацией с толстым слоем.
Это даст относительно наглядное представление, чем "свет", как образ нашего мозга в ответ на обработку распределения проинтерферированной напряжённости поля, отличается от реальной эл-маг волны, как он отражается от плоской "зеркальной" поверхности и от неровной поверхности, почему для света существуют кажущиеся нам законы отражения и преломления (замедления света) в веществе
keep doing cool things! thank You! 🎉
Reflection is key.
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
"Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart and soul's fate revealed. In time, all points converge; hope's strength resteeled. But to earn final peace at the Universe's endless refrain, we must see all in nothingness... before we start again."
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
-- Diamond Dragons (series)
Love your voice
It's Kira, not Eugene😄 . Excellent narrator.
@@mikkel715 yes, i figured so 😅
Dear Eugene, please do a video on Electrodynamics of Electrical Circuit - Traditional View and Electromagnetic View of Ohms Law and Kirchhoff's Law.
If you haven't already seen it, I have a video titled "Electromagnetism - Maxwell's Laws" at ua-cam.com/video/9Tm2c6NJH4Y/v-deo.html
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I would like to watch a 3D animated explanation from this cannel on the controversial video by Veritasium on how Energy flow in a Circuit.
Something that would be nice to show is what happen with a gradient of speed
Nice video 👍
Yay new video
I am glad you like my videos.
I can visualise this how pulse wave form transmission from arterial structure to arteriolar wave form with different pulse wave velocities .Reflected wave is transmitted to the closed aortic valve at one end and Arteriolar network in other end with arterial structure in between
Nice 👍
Thanks.
Thanks for sharing.
I want to see collaboration with 3 blue and 1 brown channel
❤🔥
Excellentingreat!
Thanks.
Does this apply to photons even though they move at relativistic speeds? I would have expected that, if we have the wavefunction of an individual photon as the wave, that the part reflected vs transmitted would be like, the superposition of whether or not it was reflected,
But, in that case, I would expect the squares of the amplitudes to add to the square of the original amplitude (the squares of the amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted parts being the probability of it being observed to have been reflected or transmitted respectively), rather than the amplitudes adding to the original amplitude?
Maybe this only applies in the situation with a large number of photons? Like, if the amplitude isn’t the probability amplitude, but the photon number or something?
Am I making a silly mistake?
Uh, if we have a Bosonic Fock space and for the single particle, in state psi_1 , uh, U(psi_1) = sqrt(p) psi_2 + sqrt(1-p) psi_3 (with psi_2 and psi_3 being orthogonal states)
Then, the analogous thing to U with domain the Fock space, would send the vector with N copies of psi_1 to…
uhh…
Well, the N copies of psi_1 can be obtained by the N-th power of the creation operator for psi_1 , applied to the vacuum vector..
and then, F(U) (a_1^*)^N Omega = (F(U) a_1^* F(U)^*)^N F(U) Omega
which is probably = (F(U) a_1^* F(U)^*)^N Omega ?
which is maybe (sqrt(p) a_2^* + sqrt(1-p) a_3^*)^N Omega ?
Which seems like it would be…
well, the a_2^* and a_3^* should commute with each-other due to it being the Bosonic Fock space,
so, should be like, sum_{k=0}^N binom(N,k) sqrt(p^k (1-p)^{N-k} ) (a_2^*)^k (a_3^*)^{N-k} Omega
Which, wait, that isn’t properly normalized because the binomial coefficient would get squared… uhh… I made a mistake…
If N is large… I guess the variance in “how many are reflected” only grows as sqrt(N) , and so the variance in the fraction that are reflected goes as sqrt(1/N) , and so goes to zero as N goes to infinity.
Hm. I don’t know relativistic QFT. I guess for non-relativistic quantum mechanics, I can’t really have the wave speed be independent of the frequency… can I? Not for a free particle in any case…
(Though, presumably something similar should be true for phonons, and those don’t have relativistic speeds, so, it should be possible to relate what is described here to a limit of a large number of phonons?)
Ok, yeah, while I imagine that what is described in the video probably applies to light, I don’t know how to relate it to a quantum mechanical picture.
Great video! Is this the same case for tunneling?
No, tunneling has to do with the energy level of the barrier vs the energy of the wave. I have a video on Quantum Tunneling at ua-cam.com/video/RF7dDt3tVmI/v-deo.html
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you for clarifying!
Good stuff.
Thanks!
物理法則に時間は関係しないという理由に「逆再生を区別できないから」というのがあるが、あの理屈はまやかしである、
何故なら時間を排除までどころか進む向きを変えるだけで波動は変化する、単一波動では逆再生できても複数の波動では相関不確定性まで再現することは出来ない。
👏👏👏
Did you do Osaka from Azumanga Daioh?
❤❤
Is this related to whips in any way? Like how the end of a whip can go supersonic? The end of the whip is not fixed, wouldn't that result in double amplitude at the end?
What if change in wave velocity is not abrupt but smooth?
Hello, could you please share which software you use to make these videos. Am planning on learning blender for 3d software simulations. Any suggestions will help..
I use the software "Poser." I explain how I make my 3D animations in my video at ua-cam.com/video/6Hl5dvA88Uo/v-deo.html
@EugeneKhutoryansky
Thank you so much.
By the way, is there any explanation on why during the scenario where the middle wave have velocity of 1 and the flank waves have velocity of 2, only the first reflection is flipped upside down?
It is because a wave reflection is flipped upside down when the material it is entering has a lower speed.
THE Music is back LETS GO
Music is Haram. There should be no music in such educational stuff.
@@WajihaHaleema-bk8xq The absolute truth
@@1qaz1qaz15 Are you siding with me or mocking me?
@@WajihaHaleema-bk8xq Allah said the in the quraa
قُلْ أَبِاللَّهِ وَآيَاتِهِ وَرَسُولِهِ كُنْتُمْ تَسْتَهْزِئُونَ لَا تَعْتَذِرُوا قَدْ كَفَرْتُمْ بَعْدَ إِيمَانِكُمْ [التوبة:66].
they will surely say, "We were only conversing and playing." Say, "Is it Allah and His verses and His Messenger that you were mocking?"9:66 Make no excuse; you have disbelieved after your belief. surah Tawbah aya 66
mocking something like that might lead to Kufr; in short, no, I wasn't mocking.
@@1qaz1qaz15 You came to your true side. Great. We will dominate the world. Inshallah
is this true for electromagnetic waves, aka light?
Electromagnetic waves have a different set of equations for the reflection and transmission coefficients.
Cool... but *why* does it happen?
You can derive it from Newton's 3 laws of motion if you model the rope as a series of masses connected to each other by springs. The different materials could have different mass densities.
when considering longitudonal waves: does a reflection occur when one end is open?
Yes.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I'm thinking of air particles escaping into vacuum , but I can't quite picture it.
I was thinking of longitudinal waves through a solid material. If you have a gas, such as air, and a vacuum, then what would happen is that all of the gas will escape into the vacuum, with or without a wave.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky I thought so too. I suppose sound waves do behave similar to the ones in your video when they pass through mediums with different density or pressure. In the limit, where one medium has zero density, all reflections seize
keren bg
hello , what is the application of this theory please , thanks
Please help!!!
The cubic root of 1 is
-0.5 + 0.86602540378444 i
Time slows by 50% (-0.5) when traveling at 86.60254037% the speed of light!
It's also the cosine of 30
Does anyone want to tell me what's going on here?
how was this formula derived?
You can derive it from Newton's 3 laws of motion if you model the rope as a series of masses connected to each other by springs. The different materials could have different mass densities.
👍
he is trying to explain metal pipe meme
5 min!!! pls reply to me!!!!!!
Hello.
When unabsorbed heat singularities strike resistance lights up the mass, it strikes like a filament vibration. Lightning is rapid heat loss striking atmospheric gasses lighting up surrounding atmospheres from instantaneously disolving internal magnetic fields grounding currents through its nucleus or core where external heat energy force is strongest as external heat energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable heat energy when absorbed into internal magnetic fields. Unabsorbed instantaneously disolving internal magnetic fields as external heat energy force of pressure as fire lines in the sky like forest fires. Waves crash the beach or rocks with overspray. Electricity is rapid heat exchanging through mass as grounding currents into earth's internal magnetic field. When heat can't rise above the cold atmospheric gasses, it condensates. Heat tunnels through the eye of the storm until pressure is equalization to magnetism centrifugal force cycling circulation within and without entanglement of magnetic fields as external heat energy singularities within and without entanglement of internal magnetic fields grounding currents through its nucleus or core where force is strongest around it. Hurricanes and tornadoes spinning all external heat energy faster than normal momentum of space itself. Centrifugal force within and without mass equalization of pressure. Heat cycling circulation patterns around cold repulsion of space as the nucleus neutralized repulsion within mass as outward force of pressure. Hurricanes and tornadoes are outward force of pressure in repulsion to cold space itself within and without entanglement of internal and external magnetic fields like black holes. External magnetic fields spinning around these monopoles of pure cold repulsion within the nucleus or core where external heat force is stronger at the event horizon perimeter. Tornadoes and hurricanes work as magnetic fields. Magnetism explains everything about physics.
This reads I think like the result of clanging disorder? I’m not a doctor, so I can’t evaluate that with confidence though?
Maybe ask someone you know irl and who you trust, whether what you wrote in your comment, makes sense to them.
Music lower...
For waves on transmission lines, this treatment is not correct. Wave velocity mismatches don’t matter - impedance mismatches do. Two cables with different velocity factors but same impedance will have no reflection at their union.
I knew that someone bring this up, which is why I stated in the video that these equations are different for transmission lines. This is written at the bottom of the screen at 10 minutes and 10 seconds into the video. I have a separate video for transmission lines at ua-cam.com/video/ozeYaikI11g/v-deo.html
12h
Too much background noise, making these very good videos to worst.
If the music bothers you that much, you can turn off the sound and turn on the subtitles.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky
You are right Sir, people who don't like to watch educational videos with intense background noise are not eligible to watch videos on this channel.
first?
Yes, you have the first comment.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky yipee! :D keep up the educational videos, they're great
I'm excited for this but the music is punishing.
Great explanations! Terrible music. Especially that piano bit.
Excellent chosen background music...
Bad comment. Music is excellent as always!