@@hahope in my opinion doubles is a whole different ballgame. You have more court to work with which gives you an opportunity to hit even bigger with sharper angles. If you are rallying cross court, I would highly recommend hitting high over the night other than that absolutely not in doubles
@@4justiceagainstevil I've got plenty of topspin. I developed a one hand backhand with more topspin than the adults around me as a kid. Don't need two hands on a backhand for extra power either. I like Patrick and subscribe to his channel but I found it mildly condescending. Of course it's not good to hit the net. Of course you better know where you're on the court to try and hit over the low part of the next. If you can't then you need to clear the higher part. That requires topspin. I personally don't need to hit 8 feet over the net for depth is all. And I'm old. Tennis evolves anyway. Players getting their hands held by their coaches boxes all match long is boring. It makes it a team sport which it isn't. Team before and after the match, but while you're playing you better be able to problem solve on your own. Last night Medvedev beat Alcaraz partly because no one was in his ear, while Alcaraz had a constant amount of coaching chatter. Also most coaches have never been to a slam semi. They have no clue in that situation what to do or say either. Can't recall ever seeing Patrick play on the tour. I'm sure he has, but I've been WATCHING this sport for 48 years as well. Sorry for the lengthy response. Tennis is a passion for me.
Thanks for this video Patrick! This is one of the things that my coach usually emphasizes a lot during training. Both this and accelerating have a huge potential to allow us to actually play safer balls. For someone who used to play very flat like me, this is great.
Someone famously said, play high in singles but play low in doubles. I don't think playing high over the net is a good idea in doubles - being poached easily.
Said by you and you are ?@@jokuheppu3920 Even if you only play singles, when you do passing shots, you want to keep it low around the net level, or at an extreme angel. Same philosophy as in doubles. Also, look at players in singles who have a attacking style: Federer, Rublev, they all play lower over the net in singles.
This has been my main focus for about a couple of years now. Still a work in progress but it's funny because now if I hit my groundstrokes (except slice) within 2 feet above the net I get annoyed even if it's a good shot.😂
you can hit a flat shot with all your power, but you must aim just above the net. in topspin you can go for net clearnce thing. As simple as that, its not the tendency but top players require to hit flat shots alot hence they aim for just above the net and sometimes they hit net.
You put topspin on most every drive to bring the ball down but we're talking the difference between a more natural line and a loopy ball. The more straight line topspin is going from point A to B faster and direct the loopy shot slows down in the air but gets an extra kick when it hits but will lose speed faster after the initial kick. It's the same physical law that governs a flat serve and a kick/topspin serve. Like Elon Musk said the laws of physics are unforgiving. If any coach or dumbbell player wants to change them good luck 🤞
Why not hit a deep flat shot in the corner then take a weak bouncing near service line a topspin in the corner for a winner or come to net and volley. If you hit flatten out or slice shot hard in corner the guy has to hit up on the ball for you to pick off at the net. Also try this hit very slow and low deep slice chip shot down the line and make the guy pick it off his shoelaces with zero pace jump on the net and angle volley for winner. Johnny Mac favorite tactic.
Great advice….I am a 5.0 player and my hitting partner has a very heavy ball, so if you watched us, it’d be like “why does that guy keep dumping the ball in the net?” It’s because I’m playing against a ducking bowling ball. You just have to have strength in your legs (which I don’t) to push that ball back.
@@liamkingsbury7438 Depends a ton on who you're playing against. Most decent singles players are looking for an approach shot, and if you hit low you're bound to give them one pretty quickly and put yourself at disadvantage
@@liamkingsbury7438 yep and if you can play deep and low that's the best like Delpo blew Roger of the court in the US Open. The ball just skidding by. It's a more risky game but it works. Risk/ rewards dynamic
It depends on the phase of the game and the playstyle as well, of course, but the thing is that when players use flat, low clearance balls, is with a purpose, usually to attack or change pace, and they have extreme accuracy as they are pros. Amateurs don't usually have the tactics/point building of pros nor the technique to hit low clearance shots consistently, so playing higher as the rule and lower as the exception will allow them to keep the ball in play longer and avoid dumb unforced errors
Watch the camera angles behind…it’s usually two to three feet above the net. nadal has insane net clearance. On attacking balls, you have to flatten out, means changing grip and swing path, you aim lower.
@@markconner5341two feet is not a lot of clearance! And when I watch these behind the court angles they’re often hitting it within a foot of the tape. Nadal and other heavy topspin players are an exception of course.
This is true today because everyone has been taught to hit with excessive topspin. Which is only possible because of the huge racquet faces now being made. Try doing that with a 70 sq in face. Now you have pros playing with 100+ sq in. The terrible consequence is the lack of variety/style of play in the game. The huge racquet faces have given too much advantage to the power game and not enough to the touch, skill, and strategy game. It's also responsible for the huge increase in two-handed backhands. Why? Because the excessive topspin being used is more easily dealt with using two hands. Again, this results in less variety of skills and strokes.
I guess my problem is the exact opposite 😂 So much talks on the importance of topspin that I just didn't learn how to godamn hit a flat horizontal ball and now my brain-arm is hardwired this way.
If you are not on a pro Level Most opponents struggle with high top Spin shots which go deep into their court. Best way to put pressure and it’s a fairly safe shot since you always have high net clearance. Im not Talking about rainbows, but heavy spin, powerful strokes, Full swings. It also gives you an extra second to move since the Ball is in the air longer so you can reposition much easier which is maybe even the Most important aspect.
I come from a small town. I went to OU tennis camp where Jason Roddick was the coach (Andy Roddick's brother) He tought us how to play deep. Went back to my small town and dominated people.
@@h.p.734 I play both, and both at competitive level. Though a much higher level in tennis. But ping pong is a game, it is a sport because it is a marginally physical activity that allows for competition, but compared to any athletic sports, it's a game, kind of like golf and bowling are. But I would place it slightly above those, physically.
@@dthorne4602Respectfully, your comment betrays total ignorance of the sport of table tennis. Look up WTT - pick a match blindfolded and see if I am correct.
Actually when I observe professionals in real life, I’m astounded how low they play over the net. They hit the ball hard and deep and low. In contrast amateur players (of a minimum standard, myself included) tend to give the ball much more margin.
You don't need a ton of topspin to hit high over the net, although you may need to back off the pace a bit if you don't have topspin. Depth of shot is usually more important than pace.
Hitting it into the net is, indeed, a stupid mistake. Never thought of it that way before but it’s so simple and yet so true. All it took was for me to hear it from Patrick. 😅
you ( and Patrick) just forget something : the fastest line is the straigth line ;) then adding net clearance gives you confort for sure ! but give confort ( more time) to the opponent too ;)
Is it really a "mistake"? Leisure players I see hit the ball low over the net and deep, because they aren't capable of generating much topspin. It isn't a "mistake" for them to hit the ball low over the net. It's the only way they can possibly prevent the ball from going out long, other than by slicing or lobbing all their shots.
Quelques vidéos en français ( origine de l'auteur) ,ça serait pas mal également... On comprend bien son accent mais par respect pour sa langue d'origine...
It absolutely does. If your opponent is impatient, 99% of the time they will return one of your deep balls shorter than they wanted. This allows you to hit an approach shot safely, and completely open up the angles which you can counter with (as opposed to hitting low and shallow, which gives your opponent this opportunity if they're savvy enough to take it)
YOUR OWN length protect you ! so yes it don't give ( or less )angles. and can bring you shorter shots of your opponent ... opening angles for you ! :) note: if you have the length, the lower net clearance just ... remove time for you r opponent so ?? what says Mlouratoglou is partly wrong. it is depending on what is your intention :)
I am a going to be counter intuitive on this one. The high target that you are aiming for doesn't exist. So your target will always be variable. I am a tennis nobody so no one will listen to me. If you tell the player to aim for the net tape, how many can hit the tape twice in a row while hitting topspin from the baseline. When you aim for the net tape you will miss high most of the time. When you aim at the tape with foward intentioned topspin as opposed to upward intentioned topspin you will get the ball in and deep in the court But don't listen to me, I am a tenni nobody.
I like to think of it this way: given all the space you have OVER the net, there is no reason to hit the ball INTO the net. If I hit a ball 30 feet into the air and it lands on my opponent's court it remains in play; if I hit the ball one inch below the net I lose the point. A healthy amount of net clearance increases your odds of winning the point or, at a minimum, staying in the point. This is 'cross-over' theory from table tennis. ✅️
"leisure players" there is many good reasons to hit the ball into the net . the best is ..pleasure. as a leisure player i ( am) should feel free about stats considerations. the time to change , improve and or create :) try a winner .. a drop shot ...a smash ... feel free to hit into the net 10 times 50 times ...until you undestand " how it works" ;) you will learn from your errors :)
@@solideomusical i will say in another way : hittting balls just to keep them "in court " won't make you improve a lot ;) take pleasure to experiment , try, analyse , undestand and try again until " it works " :)
I agree that most pro shots look close to the net but when you see a court level camera angle and behind them, their balls are actually at least 3 feet above the net. That's my observation anyway😊
Most ATP pros, including Djokovic, hit a lot higher than what appears on TV. The camera angle is deceptive. The massive topspin allows them to swing fast, hit high over the net and still get the ball in.
The only reason to play high over the net is to make your opponent hit at shoulder/head height. You receive a week shot back and spank it for a winner. Most people can't produce the extreme rpm to play high over the net. Seems to me that everyone hits the net at some point or other. Those stupid pros. I recall a guy named Jimmy Connors who played flat and hard and did real well. Lendl never hit extremely high and had some of the best groundies ever. Of course I'm no expert. I never coached Serena. This is almost a small slight to rec players. Recreational players already know this information unless they're just starting to play. Again I have no idea. I've only played for 48 years. If you can buggywhip your forehand do it. If you can't, crush it with pace.
If you've been playing for 48 years, you should know that depth is one of the main reasons you hit high over the net. A deeper ball makes it more difficult for your opponent to attack your shot and deprives them of angles. You only need extreme rpm to hit high over the net if you want to rip the ball. Lendl and other pros probably hit higher over the net than you think. The camera angle can be deceiving.
@@goldencalf5144 I appreciate the response. I was a ball boy at WCT matches for a couple of years in '80-'81 Worked a Lendl match and a McEnroe match. Lendl was hitting possibly three feet over the net and kept his opponent pinned to the baseline. Great depth without the windshield wiper forehand. A lot of power in his strokes. McEnroe would sometimes needed to play higher to achieve the same depth. Height over the net with a Western forehand is easily done by those taught in that style. Try a modified Continental/Eastern grip to get height over the net and your shot is weak. Playing with an Eastern forehand grip gets me the necessary topspin and depth. My backhand drive is less strong but again gets depth with moderate topspin: with a minor grip change and correct point of contact it was a weapon. I was taught to hit away. It's literally a different game these days, compared to when I learned.
@@JP6649 Well, I'll certainly defer to your experience watching Lendl live. But 3 feet is higher than what a lot of rec players consistently hit. The average rec player will also have nowhere near the pace of Lendl. So in order to achieve the same sort of depth, they will need to hit even higher over the net. Or hit with less topspin. Your point about McEnroe hitting higher over the net illustrates this. He knew that he needed depth to neutralize Lendl's pace.
@@goldencalf5144my friend, you are absolutely right. I learned by coaching and observation. As long as I could keep someone pinned at the baseline and attack the net when available to me I was pleased. The average rec player absolutely does need a higher percentage shot. Going higher over the net is necessary. In today's game at the pro level, with players that have so much spin It's inevitable. With that much spin the ball will dip down and stay in. A high bounce results in playing shoulder height. Making the game very different than when I learned. These days I hear the phrase "so and so has great shape on the ball". It's true! They have to add shape with so much spin to keep it in play, the word makes sense. Seen a lot of matches, and different playing styles. They all work as long as you win. I must say I didn't even bother considering the club player, you did. I must cede to your very valid point.
Doesn’t this just relate to the amount of top spin the player can generate? To clear the net high, the player needs to generate a lot of top spin, which a good player can, which is why they can take this low risk strategy of a lot of net clearance. The reason people like me skim the net low is because we can't arc the ball down as much, so we have to do that to hit it hard. For me to clear the net by as much as is shown in this video would require me to tap the ball, almost as in a lob. I'd guess that I'd win more points getting 80% of my shots close over the net and in the court at 50mph than I would if I hit the balls at 10mph, cleared the net by 50cm each time and got 99% in. Cause for me, 50mph and 50cm over the net isn't possible. Am I right, or have I misunderstood?
Heavy topspin helps, but it's not essential. You can even hit high, deep slice albeit at a slower pace. What topspin allows you to do is hit high over the net at pace. If you don't have heavy topspin, just dial back the swing speed a bit until you get the depth you want.
No, it doesn't. If you hit flat and low over the net you may hit deep if you hit hard enough, but if you have any topspin and hit low over the net, your ball will be short every time.
Not do I only play high over the net, I play high over the line too 😂
😂😂😂😂
Would this tip work for doubles? It would give easier chance for opponent to do volley.
@@hahope in my opinion doubles is a whole different ballgame. You have more court to work with which gives you an opportunity to hit even bigger with sharper angles. If you are rallying cross court, I would highly recommend hitting high over the night other than that absolutely not in doubles
Ahaha me too😂
Get that fly outta here lol
I usually play high over the fence
AGGGGGHHHHHHHH 😂😂😂😂😂 literally me a while ago
Weve all been there❤
🤣🤣🤣
My take away is that I'm very stupid because I'm hitting the net a lot....
Play how you're comfortable playing which yields the best results.
Work on your top spin, that will fix it
@@4justiceagainstevil I've got plenty of topspin. I developed a one hand backhand with more topspin than the adults around me as a kid. Don't need two hands on a backhand for extra power either. I like Patrick and subscribe to his channel but I found it mildly condescending. Of course it's not good to hit the net. Of course you better know where you're on the court to try and hit over the low part of the next. If you can't then you need to clear the higher part. That requires topspin. I personally don't need to hit 8 feet over the net for depth is all. And I'm old. Tennis evolves anyway. Players getting their hands held by their coaches boxes all match long is boring. It makes it a team sport which it isn't. Team before and after the match, but while you're playing you better be able to problem solve on your own. Last night Medvedev beat Alcaraz partly because no one was in his ear, while Alcaraz had a constant amount of coaching chatter. Also most coaches have never been to a slam semi. They have no clue in that situation what to do or say either. Can't recall ever seeing Patrick play on the tour. I'm sure he has, but I've been WATCHING this sport for 48 years as well.
Sorry for the lengthy response. Tennis is a passion for me.
Probably it wasn't the stupid, it's the random brain fart when returning the ball
Because your ball trajectory is too flat.
If only I could execute that topspin….that is what allows me to hit high over the net!
You don't necessarily need a lot of topspin to hit high over the net, though it certainly helps. You can even slice high to achieve depth.
@@goldencalf5144how can we slice high over the net?
Change grip and swing path…use a semi-western and go up rather than out….it’ll suck for six months, but you’ll be glad you did.
@@goldencalf5144 If he cant hit top spin, he wont be able to hit slices either dude...thats even more advanced than topspin.
@@goldencalf5144You could also reduce your racquet speed. You'll get less pace of course. But, it will go in and be high.
Thanks for this video Patrick! This is one of the things that my coach usually emphasizes a lot during training. Both this and accelerating have a huge potential to allow us to actually play safer balls. For someone who used to play very flat like me, this is great.
Omg I love your vids bc I'm in green ball
I play high. Just high.
Someone famously said, play high in singles but play low in doubles. I don't think playing high over the net is a good idea in doubles - being poached easily.
Play extreme angles in doubles
Doubles is irrelevant anyways.
Said by you and you are ?@@jokuheppu3920 Even if you only play singles, when you do passing shots, you want to keep it low around the net level, or at an extreme angel. Same philosophy as in doubles. Also, look at players in singles who have a attacking style: Federer, Rublev, they all play lower over the net in singles.
Not really, a high crosscourt shot is unpoachable
Doubles is a different sport and is irrelevant to this video.
This has been my main focus for about a couple of years now. Still a work in progress but it's funny because now if I hit my groundstrokes (except slice) within 2 feet above the net I get annoyed even if it's a good shot.😂
I play high over the fence too 😂😂
you can hit a flat shot with all your power, but you must aim just above the net. in topspin you can go for net clearnce thing. As simple as that, its not the tendency but top players require to hit flat shots alot hence they aim for just above the net and sometimes they hit net.
You put topspin on most every drive to bring the ball down but we're talking the difference between a more natural line and a loopy ball. The more straight line topspin is going from point A to B faster and direct the loopy shot slows down in the air but gets an extra kick when it hits but will lose speed faster after the initial kick. It's the same physical law that governs a flat serve and a kick/topspin serve. Like Elon Musk said the laws of physics are unforgiving. If any coach or dumbbell player wants to change them good luck 🤞
Really learning this at the moment.
I’ve always done this by default but struggle to get any power when trying to finish the point using a flat groundstroke.
Why not hit a deep flat shot in the corner then take a weak bouncing near service line a topspin in the corner for a winner or come to net and volley. If you hit flatten out or slice shot hard in corner the guy has to hit up on the ball for you to pick off at the net. Also try this hit very slow and low deep slice chip shot down the line and make the guy pick it off his shoelaces with zero pace jump on the net and angle volley for winner. Johnny Mac favorite tactic.
I just started playing and all your tips are spot on. Amazing coaching videos.
The closer you are towards the net the more topspin you need...
Awesome tip
Thanks a lot
I like to play over the fence to the next court
love ur tips!
EXCELLENT ADVICE COACH PATRICK!! 👏👍
i've won a bowling tournement with this tips
Your videos are very helpful and informative. Many thanks from Korea!
Thanks Great Advice.
Great tip! PS. He’s so dreamy;)❤️❤❤❤
Great advice….I am a 5.0 player and my hitting partner has a very heavy ball, so if you watched us, it’d be like “why does that guy keep dumping the ball in the net?” It’s because I’m playing against a ducking bowling ball. You just have to have strength in your legs (which I don’t) to push that ball back.
I'm struggling with this currently
This is a new perspective for me. I always try to play short above the net because I don’t want to hit “rainbows”.
And the high ball gives the guy more time to get to it hence the 30 40 shot rallies of today.
@@willkittwk exactly, a ball with small angle (almost skimming the ground its so low to the net) is way better than playing deep in my opinion
@@liamkingsbury7438 Depends a ton on who you're playing against. Most decent singles players are looking for an approach shot, and if you hit low you're bound to give them one pretty quickly and put yourself at disadvantage
@@liamkingsbury7438 yep and if you can play deep and low that's the best like Delpo blew Roger of the court in the US Open. The ball just skidding by. It's a more risky game but it works. Risk/ rewards dynamic
but I have seen many professionals play low
It depends on the phase of the game and the playstyle as well, of course, but the thing is that when players use flat, low clearance balls, is with a purpose, usually to attack or change pace, and they have extreme accuracy as they are pros. Amateurs don't usually have the tactics/point building of pros nor the technique to hit low clearance shots consistently, so playing higher as the rule and lower as the exception will allow them to keep the ball in play longer and avoid dumb unforced errors
Watch the camera angles behind…it’s usually two to three feet above the net. nadal has insane net clearance. On attacking balls, you have to flatten out, means changing grip and swing path, you aim lower.
@@markconner5341two feet is not a lot of clearance! And when I watch these behind the court angles they’re often hitting it within a foot of the tape. Nadal and other heavy topspin players are an exception of course.
No any that are good enough to be on TV
I teach this everyday....I think we come from the same school. Another benefit is the bounce is high making your opponent hit above his/hers shoulder
I prefer high over the fence and into the trees
low over the net and deep
❌️
the best way ! Delpo forehand ! PAF ! :)
Sooo true. Tried that million times 😊🎉
This is true today because everyone has been taught to hit with excessive topspin. Which is only possible because of the huge racquet faces now being made. Try doing that with a 70 sq in face. Now you have pros playing with 100+ sq in. The terrible consequence is the lack of variety/style of play in the game. The huge racquet faces have given too much advantage to the power game and not enough to the touch, skill, and strategy game. It's also responsible for the huge increase in two-handed backhands. Why? Because the excessive topspin being used is more easily dealt with using two hands. Again, this results in less variety of skills and strokes.
leisure players ... pleasure ! ;)
Nothing more true than that, Coach
I tried it & it works thank you
the length can be reached by the go through dear Patrick ;)
I guess my problem is the exact opposite 😂 So much talks on the importance of topspin that I just didn't learn how to godamn hit a flat horizontal ball and now my brain-arm is hardwired this way.
Avid saying it aint bout the money but immediately accepting it when jynxi offers it😂
Robin Söderling and his forehand say hi. Tennis is not just about avoiding mistakes.
Yes excellent correct sir
When u are right u r right ✅️
Gracias Patrick
If you are not on a pro Level Most opponents struggle with high top Spin shots which go deep into their court. Best way to put pressure and it’s a fairly safe shot since you always have high net clearance. Im not Talking about rainbows, but heavy spin, powerful strokes, Full swings. It also gives you an extra second to move since the Ball is in the air longer so you can reposition much easier which is maybe even the Most important aspect.
did you see ALcaraz in RG2024 and even Wimby 2023 ?? ;)
This is all the confirmation I need that I am indeed stupid 😂
Second to you brother
I come from a small town. I went to OU tennis camp where Jason Roddick was the coach (Andy Roddick's brother)
He tought us how to play deep. Went back to my small town and dominated people.
Ironic!
John Roddick.
what about the pressure to keep the ball inside the court..
This is for both double and single; or just single?
But it's boring to see high balls,looks too defensive
My club pro drilled us to hit 5 ft over the net.
In a match should I push or should I hit hard
Very cool! It's not quite the same in table tennis, where you want it low and fast, not high and deep.
The difference between a sport and a game.
@@dthorne4602 ah! The blissful ignorant 😄
@@h.p.734 I play both, and both at competitive level. Though a much higher level in tennis. But ping pong is a game, it is a sport because it is a marginally physical activity that allows for competition, but compared to any athletic sports, it's a game, kind of like golf and bowling are. But I would place it slightly above those, physically.
@h.p this tip applies 100% to table tennis. If you watch high level players the amount of net clearance is ridiculous!
@@dthorne4602Respectfully, your comment betrays total ignorance of the sport of table tennis. Look up WTT - pick a match blindfolded and see if I am correct.
Moura : leisure mentality !
It so useful tennis knowledge. Thank Master ❤❤❤
Counter intuitive. Rings true
What about the doubles? I tend to get a poacher on these high balls and it's easier to put away.
Training to shoot the net with right effect and you will gain every points when you need it .. without apologies ...
Flat = low and fast ball, topspin = high and slow ball
Fed used to play low, forcing the opponent come close to the baseline.
Super lesson a cgabce mire chances not one
what abaout if we playing double...are the rule is the same....??? because if we hit the high...the opponent will easely hit with the voley...
Excelent
funny how my coach wants me to play lower balls
Im was a short player but now i high
Actually when I observe professionals in real life, I’m astounded how low they play over the net. They hit the ball hard and deep and low. In contrast amateur players (of a minimum standard, myself included) tend to give the ball much more margin.
Hit high could also mean hit long. Some of us don't have topspin. 😢😢😢
Try to change the grip. It helped me a lot when I changed the Eastern grip to Semi Western.
@@carlosdias92I’m a eastern grip that hits spin but it just depends on what grip u use
You don't need a ton of topspin to hit high over the net, although you may need to back off the pace a bit if you don't have topspin. Depth of shot is usually more important than pace.
With a racket face vertical to the ground at contact it’s extremely hard to make balls land behind the baseline. Try it if you doubt.
hit lower that simple ;)
keep in mind that the hand have to go where you want the ball to go :)
it works very well ;)
This is my problem I'm trying to fix it 😢
NGL i play low and my balls barley hit the end of the box how do u play deep
swing harder, have a more aggressively rotated grip to counteract the pace and keep the ball from sailing.
Sinner huts flatter and ball bounces at servuce line a lot vut ball bounces fast so??
So So true
Hitting it into the net is, indeed, a stupid mistake. Never thought of it that way before but it’s so simple and yet so true. All it took was for me to hear it from Patrick. 😅
you ( and Patrick) just forget something : the fastest line is the straigth line ;)
then adding net clearance gives you confort for sure ! but give confort ( more time) to the opponent too ;)
but the low balls look so good…..
yeaaaah :) leisure !! pleasure ! keep in mind it is a game :)
it is just your choice.
Is it really a "mistake"? Leisure players I see hit the ball low over the net and deep, because they aren't capable of generating much topspin. It isn't a "mistake" for them to hit the ball low over the net. It's the only way they can possibly prevent the ball from going out long, other than by slicing or lobbing all their shots.
there is no true rule :)
it is depending on your way to play , mainly agressive ot not :)
Quelques vidéos en français ( origine de l'auteur) ,ça serait pas mal également...
On comprend bien son accent mais par respect pour sa langue d'origine...
ça payera moins ^^^^ et puis tant qu'à dire des trucs si basiques mais encore contestables hein autant que ce ne soit pas dans notre chère langue :)
Instructions unclear. Now it’s all out
mamy player think being tight with the next show how accurate your stroke is 😂 but they do unforced eror so much
it is a way to be accurate for sure !
not the only one. it is just an agressive way to play ;)
Not just in tennis is it important to play deep 😏
High over net, seems way too much time for the opponent. Take time away. That seems to be best. Especially in doubles.
Depth is effective 90% of the time, but depth does not give you the angles to open up the court.
It absolutely does. If your opponent is impatient, 99% of the time they will return one of your deep balls shorter than they wanted. This allows you to hit an approach shot safely, and completely open up the angles which you can counter with (as opposed to hitting low and shallow, which gives your opponent this opportunity if they're savvy enough to take it)
YOUR OWN length protect you !
so yes it don't give ( or less )angles.
and can bring you shorter shots of your opponent ... opening angles for you ! :)
note: if you have the length, the lower net clearance just ... remove time for you r opponent so ??
what says Mlouratoglou is partly wrong.
it is depending on what is your intention :)
Gotta have heavy topspin to bring the ball back down though!
I am a going to be counter intuitive on this one. The high target that you are aiming for doesn't exist. So your target will always be variable. I am a tennis nobody so no one will listen to me. If you tell the player to aim for the net tape, how many can hit the tape twice in a row while hitting topspin from the baseline. When you aim for the net tape you will miss high most of the time. When you aim at the tape with foward intentioned topspin as opposed to upward intentioned topspin you will get the ball in and deep in the court But don't listen to me, I am a tenni nobody.
I alwayw hit too long, how do I fix that?
usually by pushing your hand ( more ) forward instead of higher ;)
the hand goes where you want your ball to go ;)
I like to think of it this way: given all the space you have OVER the net, there is no reason to hit the ball INTO the net. If I hit a ball 30 feet into the air and it lands on my opponent's court it remains in play; if I hit the ball one inch below the net I lose the point.
A healthy amount of net clearance increases your odds of winning the point or, at a minimum, staying in the point.
This is 'cross-over' theory from table tennis. ✅️
magnificently ... boring ^^^^
@@antoinev9733 The clip?
"leisure players"
there is many good reasons to hit the ball into the net . the best is ..pleasure.
as a leisure player i ( am) should feel free about stats considerations.
the time to change , improve and or create :)
try a winner .. a drop shot ...a smash ... feel free to hit into the net 10 times 50 times ...until you undestand " how it works" ;)
you will learn from your errors :)
@@antoinev9733 🤔
@@solideomusical i will say in another way :
hittting balls just to keep them "in court " won't make you improve a lot ;)
take pleasure to experiment , try, analyse , undestand and try again until " it works " :)
idk why, I've always hated seeing my forehand go high over the net.
Because you think that low over the net means you are good. It doesn't.
@@dthorne4602 if he is able too, he is good.
if you are not able you are weak :o)
just another way , less boring to play.
Good tip but in watching matches on UA-cam most of the players seem to be hitting low over the net
I guess the choice is yours. Trust your eyes, or trust your ears?
I agree that most pro shots look close to the net but when you see a court level camera angle and behind them, their balls are actually at least 3 feet above the net. That's my observation anyway😊
Your eyes are fooling you because the camera is above the action. Any pros who mostly hit their balls low over the net will have very short careers
Djokovic actually doesn't. He plays mostly flat unless he wants to topspin it cross court
That's what I think plus too high slows ball down. You gotta watch tennis at court level from back of the players. Djoks and Fed don't play too high.
watch his match court level its high. of course it varies depending on situation
2019 nitto atp vs Federer court level you will see they varied the length and height of ball clearance.
Most ATP pros, including Djokovic, hit a lot higher than what appears on TV. The camera angle is deceptive. The massive topspin allows them to swing fast, hit high over the net and still get the ball in.
@@goldencalf5144 exactly why hit flat with low clearance, low percentage when you can hit just as hard with tons of topspin and more margin of error
Thanks Patrick. How high over the net is the ideal height?
for me it is 50cm above the net or higher
@@honganhpham2729agree, at least that's what my coaches teach me as well
I think a lot of people just play high
I play high over the fence...
destroy the fence :o)
Wow thought the opposite
I don't see any pros hitting high over the net. Tsippas hits hard and low.
Tsitsipas hits higher over the net than most pros, im not sure how you came to the conclusion you just stated.
I'd pay $7500/hr for this kind of incredible advice.
The only reason to play high over the net is to make your opponent hit at shoulder/head height. You receive a week shot back and spank it for a winner. Most people can't produce the extreme rpm to play high over the net. Seems to me that everyone hits the net at some point or other. Those stupid pros. I recall a guy named Jimmy Connors who played flat and hard and did real well. Lendl never hit extremely high and had some of the best groundies ever. Of course I'm no expert. I never coached Serena. This is almost a small slight to rec players. Recreational players already know this information unless they're just starting to play. Again I have no idea. I've only played for 48 years. If you can buggywhip your forehand do it. If you can't, crush it with pace.
If you've been playing for 48 years, you should know that depth is one of the main reasons you hit high over the net. A deeper ball makes it more difficult for your opponent to attack your shot and deprives them of angles. You only need extreme rpm to hit high over the net if you want to rip the ball. Lendl and other pros probably hit higher over the net than you think. The camera angle can be deceiving.
@@goldencalf5144 I appreciate the response. I was a ball boy at WCT matches for a couple of years in '80-'81 Worked a Lendl match and a McEnroe match. Lendl was hitting possibly three feet over the net and kept his opponent pinned to the baseline. Great depth without the windshield wiper forehand. A lot of power in his strokes. McEnroe would sometimes needed to play higher to achieve the same depth. Height over the net with a Western forehand is easily done by those taught in that style. Try a modified Continental/Eastern grip to get height over the net and your shot is weak. Playing with an Eastern forehand grip gets me the necessary topspin and depth. My backhand drive is less strong but again gets depth with moderate topspin: with a minor grip change and correct point of contact it was a weapon. I was taught to hit away. It's literally a different game these days, compared to when I learned.
@@JP6649 Well, I'll certainly defer to your experience watching Lendl live. But 3 feet is higher than what a lot of rec players consistently hit. The average rec player will also have nowhere near the pace of Lendl. So in order to achieve the same sort of depth, they will need to hit even higher over the net. Or hit with less topspin. Your point about McEnroe hitting higher over the net illustrates this. He knew that he needed depth to neutralize Lendl's pace.
@@goldencalf5144my friend, you are absolutely right. I learned by coaching and observation. As long as I could keep someone pinned at the baseline and attack the net when available to me I was pleased. The average rec player absolutely does need a higher percentage shot. Going higher over the net is necessary. In today's game at the pro level, with players that have so much spin It's inevitable. With that much spin the ball will dip down and stay in. A high bounce results in playing shoulder height. Making the game very different than when I learned. These days I hear the phrase "so and so has great shape on the ball". It's true! They have to add shape with so much spin to keep it in play, the word makes sense. Seen a lot of matches, and different playing styles. They all work as long as you win. I must say I didn't even bother considering the club player, you did. I must cede to your very valid point.
3 feet over the net, as you say Lendl did, is considered high over the net and is exactly what Patrick is saying to do here. So you agree with him.
But if you don’t hit the net keep
Playing that way
lol yes :)
just don't forget length ;)
Patrick en français svp
But first you have to learn how to put spin on the ball otherwise you’re just hitting lame moon balls
This is completely false. When pros attack they arent playing high over the net
It’s
My common mistake
Medvedev ist playing extremly low over the net.
traduisez en français merfum
I don’t know if I should trust that guy! What does he know😀
But we amateurs blow away the tennis ball by one mile 😂😢
Doesn’t this just relate to the amount of top spin the player can generate?
To clear the net high, the player needs to generate a lot of top spin, which a good player can, which is why they can take this low risk strategy of a lot of net clearance. The reason people like me skim the net low is because we can't arc the ball down as much, so we have to do that to hit it hard. For me to clear the net by as much as is shown in this video would require me to tap the ball, almost as in a lob.
I'd guess that I'd win more points getting 80% of my shots close over the net and in the court at 50mph than I would if I hit the balls at 10mph, cleared the net by 50cm each time and got 99% in. Cause for me, 50mph and 50cm over the net isn't possible.
Am I right, or have I misunderstood?
Heavy topspin helps, but it's not essential. You can even hit high, deep slice albeit at a slower pace. What topspin allows you to do is hit high over the net at pace. If you don't have heavy topspin, just dial back the swing speed a bit until you get the depth you want.
No, it doesn't. If you hit flat and low over the net you may hit deep if you hit hard enough, but if you have any topspin and hit low over the net, your ball will be short every time.