Best historian guy ever. Only one that ever said "Whatever. Who cares." in a history lecture. And we can understand the guy when he talks. Big plus there.
@@gandalfthegrey2592 , sorry dude , but Tolkien took it from general Nivelle "they shall not pass" about the germans at the battle of Verdun, Tolkien fought on the continent during WW1... ;=)
22:33 I come from the region where Pepin and Charlemagne were born, it is in the region of Liège (Belgium) on the border with Germany. Even today, we take the road which is built on the historic Roman road to go from Liège to Aachen. It takes about 10 hours to walk to Aachen. We can see how the Carolingians used the ruins of the Roman Empire to build their own.
Time passed , these 3 countries have nothing in common today except language for France and south Belgium , France have nothing to do with these countries .
@@rachelsombo9045 Wrong. First of the BeNeLux only split 190 years ago which is like nothing in the grand scope of history and secondly even parts of Northern France were historically always considered part of the 'Netherlands' (as in low lying lands, not the modern country of the same name). Genetically Northern French people have a significant amount of Frankish DNA which the other regions mentioned by MDE do as well but Southern French do not. The genetic difference between people from Northern France and Southern France is way bigger than the genetic difference between Northern French and Dutch people.
I live in Tournai and the "pont des trous" you showed at the begining got partially destroyed , the central arche got destroy to be re-built in order to have bigger boat traveling across. notice that the brige was already a modified version made in the 40's after ww2 and they didn't broke the two medieval tower so far but still a shame to touch something that old. thx for your work and especially your byzantin emperor playlist !
The Franks are some of the most interesting peoples in history. Clovis for example split one of his own soldiers head open with his axe because the guy was ordered to return a holy relic/extremely valuable object to a church he had stolen from, and this guy got pissed and smashed it to pieces with his axe instead; Clovis couldnt do anything a the moment besides apologize to the Priest that can come to get the relic back(they only asked for this relic back, none of the other treasures that the Franks had stolen in their raid); but a little later on, he still brooded over this of course; during an inspection he throw this same guy(who destroyed the holy relic) axe on the ground, then when he went to pick it up, split the dudes skull open with his own axe. Dan Carlin describes them as like a super extreme version of an outlaw biker gang in how they operated. Esp during Clovis' time this is true from what Ive seen. And the Franks, its a good thing they converted to the RIGHT kind of Christianity - this would lead to them being accepted by the Pope and therefore being accepted by all of Western Europe; the Franks, because of their conversion to orthodox Christianity instead of Arianism(which most Germanic barbarians had converted to), the Franks had an air of real legitimacy that all other Barbarian tribes lacked....its part of why they ruled so long and so well, as the clergy were their close allies and the population would trust an orthodox Christian King and aristocrats far more than they would a bunch of Arian heretics who persecute them - like the Vandals for example. The Franks are great. I esp wanna see a video on the equipment, even theoretical, of what Charlemagnes army was equipped with, and how he usually arranged his army for battle.
I would like to know how the differences living under Arian Christian rule vs. Orthodox/proto-Catholic rule. To a peasant in the countryside, did it make a difference? I think its less about "faith" and more about administrative beauracracy. The Catholics were better administrative bureaucrats (and diplomats) then the Arian chruch.
The legend of Saintes-Maries-de-la-mer is from at least the 9th century. The three Mary’s fled Palestine to the Rhône and Marie Salomé, Marie Jacobé and their servant Sarah according to the legend stayed in France. Later the village became a destination for pilgrims.
I thought you were never going to mention one of the coolest nicknames in History. Charles 'The Hammer' Martel. Its Hammer Time!! As in Hammer of God for defeating the Muslims. BTW I saw something where the Frankish hand axe was rated highest in one analysis. They had a way of throwing multiple axes and bouncing them off the ground in front of the enemy. They would bounce around in weird directions like a football making them hard to dodge. Native Americans' tomahawk was close in design.
@@gandalfthegrey2592 Very simple. They were one of the major tribes of Germans. The name refers to their battle axe "Franziska". Under Charlemagne they were the Name giving ethnicity of his empire and parted East/ West which became a language border. France is named after them and half of today Bavaria is also named Franken with the capital Nuremberg. I don't know what you looked up but if you have difficulties please ask.
@@gandalfthegrey2592 Not exactly. In the HRE there were like 3 parts, one in Germany, one in Italy and one in today France. The emperor had to be crowned as German King in Aachen and then as Emperor by the Pope in Rome. The construction goes back to Charlemagne who was named as the protector of the Pope and constructed his empire as the new Roman empire.
A good read of this era is The Inheritance of Rome ( illuminating the dark ages 400-1000) by Chris Wickham published by Penguin Books 2009. Especially relevant is Part IV The Carolingians and Post-Carolingian West, 750-1000.
Well, I ordered the book, and am attempting to read it, but I'm finding that the writing style of the book is *extremely* dry. I love history and reading, but the writing style of this book is really a kind of extreme. It's a bone dry listing of facts, facts, facts, seemingly with no attempt at identifying general historical trends. Another thing is that I'm getting the impression that the author views things very much from the perspective of a bureaucrat, and that his message in the book seems to be that bureaucrats are the true heroes in the world and the ones that create civilization. (And as a less important thing, the author also seems to subscribe to modern hypes like global warming.) I'm hugely interested in this period of history with its change from the culture and mores of the Roman Empire towards those of Christianity, which seems to me a hugely interesting thing (the changing perspectives on things), but the book is doing a good job of eliminating my enthusiasm. The book does have a chapter (chapter 3) that discusses Christianity (which is what I saw in the amazon preview and what made me order the book), but it turns out that this is a rather short chapter, that almost exclusively discusses only *organizational* aspects of the Church (as if Christianity was exclusively only a matter of bureaucracy and organization), and seemingly doesn't address any discussion of changing worldviews. My impression is that the book seems to willfully suppress these "cultural" and "worldview" aspects of the history of this period (which are the things I am interested in).
If we remember that "ferengi" literaly comes from the ethiopian type of "frank" and that a ferengi was active in Deep Space 9 business (Quark) and another ferengi was a starfleet officer stationed there (Nog) so yea...
@@Peristerygr The term Ferengi, or something similar (edit:was)used throughout Asia for Europeans or white people. A Thai boxer from Europe or the US competing in Thailand is still often called a Farang.
Visigoth = WestGoth / Astrogoth = Eastgoth. That were Germanic tribes just like the Franks (which were a Germanic tribe confederation) ... it was more helpful if all youtubers start to use names which are better understood instead of just copy-paste. Apropos: there was no Clovis. The name was Chlodwig which is a cognate of Ludwig (just like with Ludwig van Beethoven or King Ludwig who created Neuschwanstein etc. - apropos, Louis also is just a later localized version of Ludwig). A guy with the name Charlemagne also never existed. His name was Carl or Karl -der Grosse (latinized 'Carolus Magnus'). He spoke a Germanic/Frankish dialect and could only read Latin. His latinized name was usually used by chronologist of that time in written text (kind of slightly Germanized medivial Latin btw.) ... the reason why is is named 'der Grosse/the Great' is unclear. Might be due to what he archived, might be due to his size (1.84m, which was really huge at that time) or both. And no, Paris was not the capital of the Franks all the time. Karl der Grosse (Charles the Great) chose Aachen (just like many Kings later from the Holy Roman Empire) if they chose a capital in the first place. Aachen/Germany is also where Carl created the Cathedral and other stuff - and where his Shrine is, if you want visit him (or what he might be him). He is mummified btw, and there are text about ppl who investigated later a bit and noticed that he was still in a good shape due to that. Many Frankish ruler just wandered around without an explicit capital ...
You're correct that Charlemagne/Karl der Große/Karl de Grote/Carl the Great's mother tongue was a Germanic Frankish language/dialect. But if we're going to be hyper-specific, then there are a few things that should be pointed out. (1) He may not have been a native speaker, but many historians believe he was capable of speaking Latin and Gallic Romance, not just reading it. His friend Einhard wrote of him: "And not being satisfied with his native language alone, [Karl] also gave much attention to the learning of foreign tongues, among which was Latin, which he learned so perfectly that he was accustomed to pray indifferently in that language or in his own. Greek, however, he learned to understand better than to pronounce. He was in truth so eloquent, that he seemed like a professional rhetorician." Einhard is a bit of a biased source, but it's not strange to believe that Charlemagne would have been able to speak Latin. It wasn't that rare at the time and it was the language of the Frankish court (2) It's not entirely certain if Charlemagne's native Frankish dialect was one of the ones affected by the High German Consonant Shift (HGCS for short). The HGCS began in the southern dialects and spread northward from there, stopping along what is now called the Benrath line. A lot of the dialects spoken in Northern Gaul were almost certainly unaffected by it during the time of Charlemagne, meaning that the shift from "Grot" >> "Groz" (later "Große", derived from Proto-Germanic *grautaz) would not have occurred in them. However, we're not certain where Charlemagne was born. It might have been near Aachen, it might have been near Liège. It's also not clear how far the HGCS had spread at this point. To add to this, different dialects used different forms of the masculine definite article at this time, not necessarily "der/ther". So, his title could have been "ther Grot(e)/Groz(e)", "th(i)e Grot(e)/Groz(e)", "then Grot(e)/Groz(e)", etc in his native dialect. Of course, we don't know if the "magnus"/"the Great" title was used during his lifetime or if it was posthumous There are a lot of details from this period that aren't entirely clear, especially among the Germanic peoples, and different languages will naturally have different names for important historical figures. In light of that, I don't see anything wrong with calling him Charlemagne or whichever other option you prefer. The main point is making sure other people understand who you're talking about. The same goes for Clovis and the Visigoths and Ostrogoths. If using the terms "Westgoths"/"Westerngoths" and "Eastgoths"/"Easterngoths" makes you more understood, then go for it. But make no mistake, the terms "Visigoths" and "Ostrogoths" are well established and many people are already familiar with them. It's a great thing to be interested in these details and educate others on them, but let's not get too upset if people skip over them
@@bhavjotsingh5820Also, a tiny addition, Karl could not read or write! Einhard talks about how he tried to learn later in life but his inability to comprehend the teachings frustrated him and he eventually quit.
Fun facts about Charlemagne, Martel and Portuguese: 1) Hammer in portuguese is still "martelo". 2) Magne is "magno", wich is a somewhat archaic term but still in use in some situations.
Why didn't (apparently) anything happen in the 7th century? There are the Merowingian conquests to the east and south in the 6th century; and then there are the Karolingian conquests to northern and south-eastern Germania and also southern "France" (plus fighting off the Moorish invasion in the south, in the 8th and early 9th century. But no action in the 7th?
Speculating a bit here, but I think the Edict of 614 banned Jews from royal office - and before, Jews often served in Merovingian office for two reasons: (1) they could read (Torah, of course) and write, and (2) their service avoided bringing into a royal administration barbarian religious disputes, such as Arianism v. Catholicism (for example; "early official Christianity" or "barbarian Dark Ages Christianity" had lots of these). The driver of such a change need not necessarily be Christian bigotry against Jews, though in 582 Chilperic ordered all Jews in Neustria to convert to Christianity (that absurd edict was ignored). Making literacy a Church monopoly makes "logical Dark Ages sense" if Christian disputes are no longer a big risk because Catholicism has won out, and a Catholic ruler wants to strengthen the kingdom by upgrading the quality of such "public education" as the age afforded (by monopoly) and also by changing who eligibly administers the kingdom. Landowning, troop-leading Christian nobles (or their school-aged sons) rather than effectively Jewish rabbis or merchants maybe had come to be of more value to the king as patronage appointees, and such Christians to qualify for such important jobs could not be illiterate. Again, I'm speculating and welcome those more qualified in this history to comment. 🙂
I actually looked into Charlemagne’s name and it appears that his name was probably Karl. A decent piece of evidence for this is that in every Germanic language I looked through his name is almost always a translation of Karl the Magnus so I think Charlemagne is just a combination of the French translation Charl le magne but I could be wrong.
During Charles' time, the name was both Karl in Early Old French (with declensions, so Karlus/Karlo/Karle) and the Germanic speeches from Eastern Austrasia as attested by the Oath of Strasbourg. Charlemagne is indeed a contraction of the nickname with the name, he's also Charles the First in French succession lists (the notion that the Franks and the French, or that the Frankish Kingdoms and France, are two different things is a very modern one)
The name "Karl" or "Charles" is related to the Anglo-Saxon word "ceorl" which just meant "an ordinary man" -the English word "churlish" derives from this word.
Yes -reminds me of Alexander the great and his mother olympias -she probably hired someone to kill king Phillip the Second as Alexander would lose his rights to succeed if phillip lived.They both pretended to be deeply shocked by the death but they put on an act.Pausanias the killer was killed almost immediately so he wouldn't talk and divulge information.
I speculate that those nicknames were given by the history-makers in the Frankish bureaucracy as rewards for being complacent puppets. As Roman history shows, rulers who asserted power at the detriment of the aristocracy tend to get slandered by historians (such as Caligula) where the more docile rulers don't.
the name "Franci" in Latin means: "loyals" or "Honest-Ones". The name was given by the Romans to German Tribes which wanted to turn into "the Roman way of life". (There where also Celtic Gauls named "Franks") After the withdrawal of the Romans these "Franks" kept calling themselfs "Franks", although the tribal names like Salians, Sugambre or Ripuarian (Chatti) also remain used. The Salii were Irminonic (river Saale), the Sugambre (South-Cimbri) Ingvaeones, while the Chatti thought to be Istvaeones.
Interesting theory and 'frankly' sounding convincing to me. Most linguists do believe the name Frank means free or honest, similar to your honest ones. Like 'being frank'. This way the Franks set themselves apart from the people they enslaved or conquered. Besides the theory you mention there is also the theory that the word frank is derived from their trademark weapon, the 'frakka' or throwing spear, which also is the main weapon of Wodan/Odin.
@@leonhendriks wow. Dus liegen zit in het dna van mensen? Als je een Franse baby zou opvoeden in Nederland, zou die later meer liegen dan een baby met Nederlands dna?
Very murky origin I think some Romans were called franks like aegidius is called king of the franks by Gregory of tours about 100 years after his death but is called master of legions in contemporary Roman documents
Remember ODO " EUDAS" Was 80 years old at the battle of Tours your slight regarding supposed drinking is based on speculation. Toulouse was given back to the visigoths line by the carolingians as they were the only ones who could hold the border. They then held it for 400 years.
so you mentioned how this is pre-fuedal, but you also use the term "duke" how was this unlike fuedalism? How were things run? Was it similar to Rome's slave economy? Was it a cheifdom? What does cheifdom even mean? Was it some early absolutist?
Don’t cheese out. It was still a pretty essential period in terms of Roman cultural collapse and the shoring up of post-Roman culture and Christianity in the west. history has no vacuums!
I always mix up Netherlands with Netherworld. 🤔 I'd never been in either. It's really not like Disneyland versus Disney World. I'd like to visit Netherlands and visit France again! 😃
I've heard on Ryan Reeves' church history podcsdt that Clovis converted to 'Catholicism' specifically because his wife repeatedly tried to nag him to her faith. Perhaps this came after the battle he fought, before which he prayed to God. :-)
Religion was a form of geopolitical strategy back then, and to some extent still is today. Bedside "at death's door" conversion stories are fairy tales for the dumb masses.
Well Christianity back then seemed a decentralized religion. It was Justinian in the 6th century who centralized, it seems to me by making them Orthodox. I guess it could be called “catholic” in the sense of a “universal” Christianity.
So these gothic tribes are the kodeshim of the book of Daniel, they are described in Daniel as taking on the fourth beast of iron which is rome. The gothic tribes are mentioned as conquering all the Roman lands as they did.
I recently found out my ancestors are the Frank, Douglas and Macbean families... mahalo for sharing with more I been looking for more about who they were...aloha
Btw....the Deep Space Nine Odo jokes were fucking great hahahaha. "He put aside his prejudice against solids long enough to defeat the muslims" hahahahaha.
You mean Doornik probably or Dornick in English, Dor comes from "Tree". in Low Franconian..why use the French town names, they spoke old Dutch, or old low Franconian, very similar to old English.. I live in Salland on the river IJssel, now Low-Saxon land... Salland, hence salien..
I've read the holy blood and the holy grail a few times. I like you don't agree with the authors conclusions. But to say it was based on no evidence whatsoever is misleading. Their historical narrative is highly detailed and factual, places, people, etc
Please do a video about the brutal and bloody invasion of Charlemagne to northern Germany. Imo that is a very much overlooked fact of European history. The city of Aachen even hands out a "peace prize" in the honour of Charlemagne every year, which totally denies the ways of conquest of Charlemagne.
@@stulora3172 Surprisingly enough I am not sarcastic, Saxons were a big problem for the Franks due to their raids so conquering and Christianizing them was a good choice. It also laid the foundation for the creation of modern day Germany, as later Otto the Great (a Christian Saxon) would create Holy Roman Empire based in Germany and on German culture.
@@aleksandersokal5279 I don't know.... Invading another people's territory and destroying culture and killing the population is never the right thing to do, in my opinion. And even from a standpoint of hundreds of years later, I don't see how the christian religion was better, or more peaceful than the germanic beliefs. I guess it comes down to one of those "what if" questions.... But I think it is safe to say that the phrase "Charlemagne united Europe" somehow misses the reality of what happened between 772 and 804 in the regions east of the Rhine.
@@stulora3172 "Peaceful Germanic beliefs"? Are you serious, human sacrifice and all that stuff is peaceful? Not only this it was also backwards, Christianity brought social stability and learning in contrast, Charlemagne preserved ancient texts and promote learning and thanks to him Europe is what it is today.
@Arpad Jones Laughing is no option. Research is better! Do your homework and research instead of becoming provokative. And in case if you continue provoking me, then my option will be to block you.
@@ofallmyintention9496 Original name? The original name was probably a couple of clicks and grunts. As far as I know, the land is called Burgundy and the people Burgundians. And I don’t really care, but if the intent is to be informative, in the context of this subject matter it’s Burgundy.
@@ofallmyintention9496 burgundia isn't a newer adaption, it doesn't exist whatsoever lol. burgundy is convention in anglophone and la bourgogne francophone
Sounds to me like the Frankish "Catholics" weren't all that in line with Rome. Delaying Baptism and practicing Polygamy were not start practice in Cachledonian Christianity.
FRANKS Could “pax franca-romana” have been established throughout the entire space of the Roman Empire and its sphere of influence if General Arbogast, a valiant Frank, had managed to defeat the emperor Theodosius the Great in 394? ua-cam.com/video/MLn_zwm3YXM/v-deo.html
transylvanian He defended Europeans - the most important to defend. The Romans betrayed their own with the citizen-laws of 212 AD. Rome could not stand up to a few 'barbarians', hence was not worth defending. New Europen blood from the north had to come in to bring new life to the southern half of Europe. The Franks defended the Indo-European peoples on the European peninsula in the west, while the Bavarians and Slavs would perform their duty in southeastern Europe. From the south came the Semites and Turks - either plundering their way through, even destroying whole cities in Iberia, with the Barbary pirates enslaving and leaving the Spanish coast vacant. After all, why did the scholars from Constantinople flee when the muslims came? Were the muslims not kind and civil, as you claim? Or did they proselytise by the sword? And that golden age you believe in was short and added very little. Perhaps too much cultural marxism has sipped through to you? Might want to drop that left-wing bias, before our community pays the ultimate price for our altruism and Gutmensch-behaviour. The ongoing conquest of western Europe by the muslims is spelling disaster; slums and no go areas are popping up in all the big cities - poverty and crime are rampant. Yet we are forced celebrate diversity and other races. You look at history through a religious lens, either "Christian" or "Muslim" - yet both are a form of oriental mysticism. Religion - as with the rest of culture - is only the expression of a people's genes. Such a view would be labbeled 'racist', even though it explains the world to a 'T'. As a Germanic I can say with ease that when Rome fell in the south, it was predominantly Germanic martiality that kept both the Semitic ideas, as well as the Semites and Turks, at bay. That is, unless you want to live in a fully semitised Europe. As a Transylvanian you should know who helped you out defending those mountain passes, bringing new life to the region. You can view history all you like, but next time do some research into 'Medieval' history.
"Europeans - the most important to defend." I laughed at this so fuckin' hard, mate. Don't let everyone see your hand like that, right when people might've been ready to take you seriously. lmao +transylvanian - You've the patients of a saint, my friend. Keep fighting the good fight.
The failed Arab Sieges of Constantinople did far more to defend Europe against Arab conquest than the Battle of Tours, which was simply an Umayyad Raid. And the "Byzantines" actually had a civilization, unlike the Germanic kingdoms of the west which at best attempted to emulate Latin culture.
Why are there so many people in the comments freaking out about the exact names of every location? For one thing, there have been 1,200-1,600 years of separation from these events, and also: who cares? It's not like Charles Martel is going to come back to life and correct this guy. Geez.
Thersites the Historian Chek this names and words if you ar not smart as PRIND albanian means ''Parent'' PRINC and PRINCES is Alb imo FRANC the letter ''F'' is change with ''P'' .the letter ''A'' is change with ''I'' PARIS you se it comes from the word PARENT I PARI in ALB... means the FIRST the franch man have this names they dont know what this means FARAC Alb.. PRIND PARIS I PARI in ALB.. the First is like Bukuresht in Romania BUKUR ESHT in alb,, means beatifull is '''QAR'' means 'in Eng...'crack'' ,, ''KRAL''means ''KING'' slav ''car''king. QAR in Alb..crack eng.. QAR,T krist childer,ic 'qil'' means ''open'',,, ''der'' means ''dor'' THEUderic theu means break dor or ''break port''
"Let's behave as logical people and begin at the beginning."
Best historian guy ever. Only one that ever said "Whatever. Who cares." in a history lecture. And we can understand the guy when he talks. Big plus there.
"Muslim starts advancing towards central Europe"
Charles Martel: "you shall not pass"
don't steal my lines dumb*ss
@@gandalfthegrey2592 , sorry dude , but Tolkien took it from general Nivelle "they shall not pass" about the germans at the battle of Verdun, Tolkien fought on the continent during WW1... ;=)
Not even a changeling couldn't stop them!!! ;)
read the "Orlando Furioso" by the Ariosto. it's very moving
@Raza Khan Or my grandson....
22:33 I come from the region where Pepin and Charlemagne were born, it is in the region of Liège (Belgium) on the border with Germany. Even today, we take the road which is built on the historic Roman road to go from Liège to Aachen. It takes about 10 hours to walk to Aachen. We can see how the Carolingians used the ruins of the Roman Empire to build their own.
"shockingly, as only rarely happens with old people, he died in a few years." golden!
"I could be king of the Franks, and I could do a great job too" lmao
Belgium, the southern Netherlands, Luxembourg, Western Germany and Northern France still have a predominantly Frankish DNA.
Time passed , these 3 countries have nothing in common today except language for France and south Belgium , France have nothing to do with these countries .
@@rachelsombo9045 The French dislike Belgium. Why?
@@rachelsombo9045 Wrong. First of the BeNeLux only split 190 years ago which is like nothing in the grand scope of history and secondly even parts of Northern France were historically always considered part of the 'Netherlands' (as in low lying lands, not the modern country of the same name). Genetically Northern French people have a significant amount of Frankish DNA which the other regions mentioned by MDE do as well but Southern French do not. The genetic difference between people from Northern France and Southern France is way bigger than the genetic difference between Northern French and Dutch people.
@@rachelsombo9045 You obviously don't know these regions and never been there.
@@c.norbertneumann4986 we don't
I live in Tournai and the "pont des trous" you showed at the begining got partially destroyed , the central arche got destroy to be re-built in order to have bigger boat traveling across. notice that the brige was already a modified version made in the 40's after ww2 and they didn't broke the two medieval tower so far but still a shame to touch something that old. thx for your work and especially your byzantin emperor playlist !
Thank you. That is very interesting. :)
The Franks are some of the most interesting peoples in history. Clovis for example split one of his own soldiers head open with his axe because the guy was ordered to return a holy relic/extremely valuable object to a church he had stolen from, and this guy got pissed and smashed it to pieces with his axe instead; Clovis couldnt do anything a the moment besides apologize to the Priest that can come to get the relic back(they only asked for this relic back, none of the other treasures that the Franks had stolen in their raid); but a little later on, he still brooded over this of course; during an inspection he throw this same guy(who destroyed the holy relic) axe on the ground, then when he went to pick it up, split the dudes skull open with his own axe.
Dan Carlin describes them as like a super extreme version of an outlaw biker gang in how they operated. Esp during Clovis' time this is true from what Ive seen. And the Franks, its a good thing they converted to the RIGHT kind of Christianity - this would lead to them being accepted by the Pope and therefore being accepted by all of Western Europe; the Franks, because of their conversion to orthodox Christianity instead of Arianism(which most Germanic barbarians had converted to), the Franks had an air of real legitimacy that all other Barbarian tribes lacked....its part of why they ruled so long and so well, as the clergy were their close allies and the population would trust an orthodox Christian King and aristocrats far more than they would a bunch of Arian heretics who persecute them - like the Vandals for example.
The Franks are great. I esp wanna see a video on the equipment, even theoretical, of what Charlemagnes army was equipped with, and how he usually arranged his army for battle.
I would like to know how the differences living under Arian Christian rule vs. Orthodox/proto-Catholic rule. To a peasant in the countryside, did it make a difference? I think its less about "faith" and more about administrative beauracracy. The Catholics were better administrative bureaucrats (and diplomats) then the Arian chruch.
Thanks i found 2 merovingian buckles in south of France.
That's awesome!
@Alcofibras haha sorry not 8.
I found 2. My detecting buddy's found 4 in the whole area.
10km from toulouse.
Look at my video finds 2019.
@Alcofibras you should.
Whrn you find something that old your are hooked.
Great fun hobby.
Thank you for such a thorough job on the history of the Franks.
Taking FOR-ever? I love all this! Thank you so much.
Really nice work, Sir!
Thank You.
Just learned that Childeric I
is my 46th great-grandfather (but then he is probably most people's 46th great grandfather)
Yeah I found him on my ancestry as well, that kind of stuff really makes you patriotic
how did you learn that?
@@karl-arnal you just trace your ancestry back and find them to be honest. I have some records that go back 1,500 years ago
The legend of Saintes-Maries-de-la-mer is from at least the 9th century. The three Mary’s fled Palestine to the Rhône and Marie Salomé, Marie Jacobé and their servant Sarah according to the legend stayed in France. Later the village became a destination for pilgrims.
What a stupid Legend.
yup.... but it's a Yankees, he thinks they know everything!!!
j'ai arrêter à mi-chemin!!
Excellent as always. 👍
"Just so you know, DS9 was not literally involved in Frankish history.".... um.... okey.... glad we got THAT cleared up!!
Lol I appreciate your delivery 😂
"And that... is Deep Space 9"
Very informative! I like it!
I thought you were never going to mention one of the coolest nicknames in History.
Charles 'The Hammer' Martel. Its Hammer Time!!
As in Hammer of God for defeating the Muslims.
BTW I saw something where the Frankish hand axe was rated highest in one analysis. They had a way of throwing multiple axes and bouncing them off the ground in front of the enemy. They would bounce around in weird directions like a football making them hard to dodge. Native Americans' tomahawk was close in design.
That Hand axe is called "Franziska" and they derived their tribal name from it. Just like the Saxons from the sax.
I am so confused, what exactly are franks. Simple terms please. I look it up, but it reads like a bunch of BS.
@@gandalfthegrey2592 Very simple. They were one of the major tribes of Germans. The name refers to their battle axe "Franziska". Under Charlemagne they were the Name giving ethnicity of his empire and parted East/ West which became a language border. France is named after them and half of today Bavaria is also named Franken with the capital Nuremberg. I don't know what you looked up but if you have difficulties please ask.
@@wolfgangpagel6989 A Question, is the kingdom of Germany and HRE the same?
@@gandalfthegrey2592 Not exactly. In the HRE there were like 3 parts, one in Germany, one in Italy and one in today France. The emperor had to be crowned as German King in Aachen and then as Emperor by the Pope in Rome. The construction goes back to Charlemagne who was named as the protector of the Pope and constructed his empire as the new Roman empire.
A good read of this era is The Inheritance of Rome ( illuminating the dark ages 400-1000) by Chris Wickham published by Penguin Books 2009. Especially relevant is Part IV The Carolingians and Post-Carolingian West, 750-1000.
Wow thanks for the recommendation I've been wanting to pick something up about the early middle ages/after the fall of western rome
I'm reading it at the moment. Amazing book.
Very nice, I like book recommendations in youtube comments. The book looks sensible and interesting, judging from its preview on amazon. Blessings!
Well, I ordered the book, and am attempting to read it, but I'm finding that the writing style of the book is *extremely* dry. I love history and reading, but the writing style of this book is really a kind of extreme. It's a bone dry listing of facts, facts, facts, seemingly with no attempt at identifying general historical trends.
Another thing is that I'm getting the impression that the author views things very much from the perspective of a bureaucrat, and that his message in the book seems to be that bureaucrats are the true heroes in the world and the ones that create civilization. (And as a less important thing, the author also seems to subscribe to modern hypes like global warming.)
I'm hugely interested in this period of history with its change from the culture and mores of the Roman Empire towards those of Christianity, which seems to me a hugely interesting thing (the changing perspectives on things), but the book is doing a good job of eliminating my enthusiasm.
The book does have a chapter (chapter 3) that discusses Christianity (which is what I saw in the amazon preview and what made me order the book), but it turns out that this is a rather short chapter, that almost exclusively discusses only *organizational* aspects of the Church (as if Christianity was exclusively only a matter of bureaucracy and organization), and seemingly doesn't address any discussion of changing worldviews. My impression is that the book seems to willfully suppress these "cultural" and "worldview" aspects of the history of this period (which are the things I am interested in).
Great work, thank you !
Thank you for the help.
1:20 "Deep Space 9 wasn't involved with the Franks"
*Blasphemy*
deep space nine was the base from which charlemagne conquered the west. every body knows that!!!
If we remember that "ferengi" literaly comes from the ethiopian type of "frank" and that a ferengi was active in Deep Space 9 business (Quark) and another ferengi was a starfleet officer stationed there (Nog) so yea...
@@Peristerygr The term Ferengi, or something similar (edit:was)used throughout Asia for Europeans or white people. A Thai boxer from Europe or the US competing in Thailand is still often called a Farang.
Who could have guessed that a 'simple tailor' had such an effect on earth's ancient history?
I only clicked for the Odo in the picture. thanks for the deep space nine
Is there something you could use to check your ancestors or something like that? I'm from the netherlands and I'm really interested
Well told - Thank You! 😎⚡️👌
Visigoth = WestGoth / Astrogoth = Eastgoth. That were Germanic tribes just like the Franks (which were a Germanic tribe confederation) ... it was more helpful if all youtubers start to use names which are better understood instead of just copy-paste. Apropos: there was no Clovis. The name was Chlodwig which is a cognate of Ludwig (just like with Ludwig van Beethoven or King Ludwig who created Neuschwanstein etc. - apropos, Louis also is just a later localized version of Ludwig). A guy with the name Charlemagne also never existed. His name was Carl or Karl -der Grosse (latinized 'Carolus Magnus'). He spoke a Germanic/Frankish dialect and could only read Latin. His latinized name was usually used by chronologist of that time in written text (kind of slightly Germanized medivial Latin btw.) ... the reason why is is named 'der Grosse/the Great' is unclear. Might be due to what he archived, might be due to his size (1.84m, which was really huge at that time) or both. And no, Paris was not the capital of the Franks all the time. Karl der Grosse (Charles the Great) chose Aachen (just like many Kings later from the Holy Roman Empire) if they chose a capital in the first place. Aachen/Germany is also where Carl created the Cathedral and other stuff - and where his Shrine is, if you want visit him (or what he might be him). He is mummified btw, and there are text about ppl who investigated later a bit and noticed that he was still in a good shape due to that. Many Frankish ruler just wandered around without an explicit capital ...
You're correct that Charlemagne/Karl der Große/Karl de Grote/Carl the Great's mother tongue was a Germanic Frankish language/dialect. But if we're going to be hyper-specific, then there are a few things that should be pointed out. (1) He may not have been a native speaker, but many historians believe he was capable of speaking Latin and Gallic Romance, not just reading it. His friend Einhard wrote of him:
"And not being satisfied with his native language alone, [Karl] also gave much attention to the learning of foreign tongues, among which was Latin, which he learned so perfectly that he was accustomed to pray indifferently in that language or in his own. Greek, however, he learned to understand better than to pronounce. He was in truth so eloquent, that he seemed like a professional rhetorician."
Einhard is a bit of a biased source, but it's not strange to believe that Charlemagne would have been able to speak Latin. It wasn't that rare at the time and it was the language of the Frankish court
(2) It's not entirely certain if Charlemagne's native Frankish dialect was one of the ones affected by the High German Consonant Shift (HGCS for short). The HGCS began in the southern dialects and spread northward from there, stopping along what is now called the Benrath line. A lot of the dialects spoken in Northern Gaul were almost certainly unaffected by it during the time of Charlemagne, meaning that the shift from "Grot" >> "Groz" (later "Große", derived from Proto-Germanic *grautaz) would not have occurred in them. However, we're not certain where Charlemagne was born. It might have been near Aachen, it might have been near Liège. It's also not clear how far the HGCS had spread at this point. To add to this, different dialects used different forms of the masculine definite article at this time, not necessarily "der/ther". So, his title could have been "ther Grot(e)/Groz(e)", "th(i)e Grot(e)/Groz(e)", "then Grot(e)/Groz(e)", etc in his native dialect. Of course, we don't know if the "magnus"/"the Great" title was used during his lifetime or if it was posthumous
There are a lot of details from this period that aren't entirely clear, especially among the Germanic peoples, and different languages will naturally have different names for important historical figures. In light of that, I don't see anything wrong with calling him Charlemagne or whichever other option you prefer. The main point is making sure other people understand who you're talking about. The same goes for Clovis and the Visigoths and Ostrogoths. If using the terms "Westgoths"/"Westerngoths" and "Eastgoths"/"Easterngoths" makes you more understood, then go for it. But make no mistake, the terms "Visigoths" and "Ostrogoths" are well established and many people are already familiar with them. It's a great thing to be interested in these details and educate others on them, but let's not get too upset if people skip over them
@@bhavjotsingh5820Also, a tiny addition, Karl could not read or write! Einhard talks about how he tried to learn later in life but his inability to comprehend the teachings frustrated him and he eventually quit.
Thanks for this
Fun facts about Charlemagne, Martel and Portuguese:
1) Hammer in portuguese is still "martelo".
2) Magne is "magno", wich is a somewhat archaic term but still in use in some situations.
Hi. Great videos.
Just one little complaint, for all your videos: Ruin = roo-in, not roin.
Why didn't (apparently) anything happen in the 7th century?
There are the Merowingian conquests to the east and south in the 6th century; and then there are the Karolingian conquests to northern and south-eastern Germania and also southern "France" (plus fighting off the Moorish invasion in the south, in the 8th and early 9th century.
But no action in the 7th?
Súper helpfull
Thanks this really helped with writing a paper about germanic christian conversion :)
you would think that the Carolingians they will their lesson from the Merovingians not to divide their realm
Can you explain why there were so many Franks in Kent (England) after the Romans left ?
Speculating a bit here, but I think the Edict of 614 banned Jews from royal office - and before, Jews often served in Merovingian office for two reasons: (1) they could read (Torah, of course) and write, and (2) their service avoided bringing into a royal administration barbarian religious disputes, such as Arianism v. Catholicism (for example; "early official Christianity" or "barbarian Dark Ages Christianity" had lots of these).
The driver of such a change need not necessarily be Christian bigotry against Jews, though in 582 Chilperic ordered all Jews in Neustria to convert to Christianity (that absurd edict was ignored). Making literacy a Church monopoly makes "logical Dark Ages sense" if Christian disputes are no longer a big risk because Catholicism has won out, and a Catholic ruler wants to strengthen the kingdom by upgrading the quality of such "public education" as the age afforded (by monopoly) and also by changing who eligibly administers the kingdom. Landowning, troop-leading Christian nobles (or their school-aged sons) rather than effectively Jewish rabbis or merchants maybe had come to be of more value to the king as patronage appointees, and such Christians to qualify for such important jobs could not be illiterate.
Again, I'm speculating and welcome those more qualified in this history to comment. 🙂
What are your sources on them delaying Baptism? I can't find it googling?
@@PROTESTVOTEINEUROS. Where in them exactly?
@@PROTESTVOTEINEUROS. Thank You
Franks rlly said in with the old and out with the new
Good review. I just found out i am related to these kings. Knew their names prior, but its been awhile. Nice job!
Idiot
In Poland in history lessons, Charles martel is called Charles the hammer.
Doesn't Martel just mean the Hammer
@@hardlo7146 I don't know French. I would bet though that it does.
I actually looked into Charlemagne’s name and it appears that his name was probably Karl. A decent piece of evidence for this is that in every Germanic language I looked through his name is almost always a translation of Karl the Magnus so I think Charlemagne is just a combination of the French translation Charl le magne but I could be wrong.
During Charles' time, the name was both Karl in Early Old French (with declensions, so Karlus/Karlo/Karle) and the Germanic speeches from Eastern Austrasia as attested by the Oath of Strasbourg. Charlemagne is indeed a contraction of the nickname with the name, he's also Charles the First in French succession lists (the notion that the Franks and the French, or that the Frankish Kingdoms and France, are two different things is a very modern one)
The name "Karl" or "Charles" is related to the Anglo-Saxon word "ceorl" which just meant "an ordinary man" -the English word "churlish" derives from this word.
Charlemagne = Karlmann/Karelman
Charlemagn'es brother Carloman died in mysterious circumstances -Charlemagne probably had him killed as he was a serious rival to the throne.
Yes -reminds me of Alexander the great and his mother olympias -she probably hired someone to kill king Phillip the Second as Alexander would lose his rights to succeed if phillip lived.They both pretended to be deeply shocked by the death but they put on an act.Pausanias the killer was killed almost immediately so he wouldn't talk and divulge information.
“Playing the flute” lololol
Ok, but where does Udo Dirkschnider fit in?
I speculate that those nicknames were given by the history-makers in the Frankish bureaucracy as rewards for being complacent puppets. As Roman history shows, rulers who asserted power at the detriment of the aristocracy tend to get slandered by historians (such as Caligula) where the more docile rulers don't.
why there is Charlemagne in one word and not Charles the great
the name "Franci" in Latin means: "loyals" or "Honest-Ones". The name was given by the Romans to German Tribes which wanted to turn into "the Roman way of life". (There where also Celtic Gauls named "Franks") After the withdrawal of the Romans these "Franks" kept calling themselfs "Franks", although the tribal names like Salians, Sugambre or Ripuarian (Chatti) also remain used.
The Salii were Irminonic (river Saale), the Sugambre (South-Cimbri) Ingvaeones, while the Chatti thought to be Istvaeones.
@@leonhendriks You are telling a lot of bullshit.
Interesting theory and 'frankly' sounding convincing to me. Most linguists do believe the name Frank means free or honest, similar to your honest ones. Like 'being frank'. This way the Franks set themselves apart from the people they enslaved or conquered. Besides the theory you mention there is also the theory that the word frank is derived from their trademark weapon, the 'frakka' or throwing spear, which also is the main weapon of Wodan/Odin.
@@leonhendriks wow. Dus liegen zit in het dna van mensen? Als je een Franse baby zou opvoeden in Nederland, zou die later meer liegen dan een baby met Nederlands dna?
From where did you took this info ?
Very murky origin I think some Romans were called franks like aegidius is called king of the franks by Gregory of tours about 100 years after his death but is called master of legions in contemporary Roman documents
Came to learn about France, got lectured on Startrek lore instead. Cool.
Remember ODO " EUDAS" Was 80 years old at the battle of Tours your slight regarding supposed drinking is based on speculation. Toulouse was given back to the visigoths line by the carolingians as they were the only ones who could hold the border. They then held it for 400 years.
Have you read The Dark Queens? It's so good, it's about Brunhild & Fredegund & their civil war for control.
so you mentioned how this is pre-fuedal, but you also use the term "duke" how was this unlike fuedalism? How were things run? Was it similar to Rome's slave economy? Was it a cheifdom? What does cheifdom even mean? Was it some early absolutist?
Don’t cheese out. It was still a pretty essential period in terms of Roman cultural collapse and the shoring up of post-Roman culture and Christianity in the west. history has no vacuums!
Please make these into podcasts
Deep Space 9 was not involved in early French history?
Huh, you learn something new every day.
What were the odds of French soldiers fighting the Umayyad?
I always mix up Netherlands with Netherworld. 🤔 I'd never been in either. It's really not like Disneyland versus Disney World. I'd like to visit Netherlands and visit France again! 😃
Only common thing between DS9 and the franks are the ferengis.
I've heard on Ryan Reeves' church history podcsdt that Clovis converted to 'Catholicism' specifically because his wife repeatedly tried to nag him to her faith. Perhaps this came after the battle he fought, before which he prayed to God. :-)
Louis Ayers how do you convert to a religion that doesn't yet exist
Catholicism has been around for as long as theres been a Pope in rome
Religion was a form of geopolitical strategy back then, and to some extent still is today. Bedside "at death's door" conversion stories are fairy tales for the dumb masses.
Well Christianity back then seemed a decentralized religion. It was Justinian in the 6th century who centralized, it seems to me by making them Orthodox. I guess it could be called “catholic” in the sense of a “universal” Christianity.
It literally means "universal". Lmao.
@@EdoardoLusuardi catholic does means universal
@@gilgalbiblewheel6313 Appunto.
So these gothic tribes are the kodeshim of the book of Daniel, they are described in Daniel as taking on the fourth beast of iron which is rome. The gothic tribes are mentioned as conquering all the Roman lands as they did.
No they did not capture the Eastern roman empire
I recently found out my ancestors are the Frank, Douglas and Macbean families... mahalo for sharing with more I been looking for more about who they were...aloha
Nice! I'm Frankish, and from Family Douglas, as well! Nice to meet you sister 😁
Childebert III is someone I can understand. I also don't like to leave the house.
Btw....the Deep Space Nine Odo jokes were fucking great hahahaha.
"He put aside his prejudice against solids long enough to defeat the muslims" hahahahaha.
They had the romans and the gauls writing for them
7:41Isn't it called Chalcedonian Christianity?
You mean Doornik probably or Dornick in English, Dor comes from "Tree". in Low Franconian..why use the French town names, they spoke old Dutch, or old low Franconian, very similar to old English.. I live in Salland on the river IJssel, now Low-Saxon land... Salland, hence salien..
I just found out through ancestry that I am 50% Frank
I am 33.5% (Deep dive, mytrueancestry). Considering where I am from it was a huge surprise.
Are you from the Low Countries?
@@accaeffe8032 mytrueancestry😂
There is another Star Trek link to the Franks. "The Ferengi" alien race name is based on the Arab name for the Franks.
I've read the holy blood and the holy grail a few times. I like you don't agree with the authors conclusions. But to say it was based on no evidence whatsoever is misleading. Their historical narrative is highly detailed and factual, places, people, etc
no, its not.
The Franks on one side and the ferengi on the other. When will it end for poor odo
I thought throwing axes as well.
Please do a video about the brutal and bloody invasion of Charlemagne to northern Germany.
Imo that is a very much overlooked fact of European history. The city of Aachen even hands out a "peace prize" in the honour of Charlemagne every year, which totally denies the ways of conquest of Charlemagne.
He pacified the pagans, so he did good work.
@@aleksandersokal5279 sarcasm detected in your comment
@@stulora3172 Surprisingly enough I am not sarcastic, Saxons were a big problem for the Franks due to their raids so conquering and Christianizing them was a good choice. It also laid the foundation for the creation of modern day Germany, as later Otto the Great (a Christian Saxon) would create Holy Roman Empire based in Germany and on German culture.
@@aleksandersokal5279 I don't know.... Invading another people's territory and destroying culture and killing the population is never the right thing to do, in my opinion. And even from a standpoint of hundreds of years later, I don't see how the christian religion was better, or more peaceful than the germanic beliefs.
I guess it comes down to one of those "what if" questions....
But I think it is safe to say that the phrase "Charlemagne united Europe" somehow misses the reality of what happened between 772 and 804 in the regions east of the Rhine.
@@stulora3172 "Peaceful Germanic beliefs"? Are you serious, human sacrifice and all that stuff is peaceful? Not only this it was also backwards, Christianity brought social stability and learning in contrast, Charlemagne preserved ancient texts and promote learning and thanks to him Europe is what it is today.
Because at that time the huns got in
LOL at 7:14 on the map you can see the province of Flevoland in the Netherlands. But Flevoland didn't even exist back then!
I don't see any marking of a Flevoland on the map...
@@ofallmyintention9496
It isn't marked. But it's there. Underneath the Ijselmeer.
Star trek fan wo der why ds9 staion is there
🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷
Is the time when many frisians moved to england
It is a recorded fact that Jesus and the Holy Family came from Wales and Scotland. This line goes back to Brutus & Aeneas and the Culdees.
@Arpad Jones Laughing is no option. Research is better! Do your homework and research instead of becoming provokative. And in case if you continue provoking me, then my option will be to block you.
@@MonikaEscobar1965 To block him, of course, not to provide source. I really hope you're jocking.
@@EdoardoLusuardi Are you another troll?
@@MonikaEscobar1965 I honestly want to know where you get your "facts" from.
After going hard in my family tree I've found myself to be related to pretty much all of these people
17:00 lol
"So they conquered Burgundia". Burgundy homie, Burgundy.
Both are newer adaptions of the original name, so neither are technically correct. Calm down; there are worse things to care about.
@@ofallmyintention9496 Original name? The original name was probably a couple of clicks and grunts. As far as I know, the land is called Burgundy and the people Burgundians. And I don’t really care, but if the intent is to be informative, in the context of this subject matter it’s Burgundy.
The Burgunds settled there and created a kingdom. The Niebelung legend is about them.
@@ofallmyintention9496 burgundia isn't a newer adaption, it doesn't exist whatsoever lol. burgundy is convention in anglophone and la bourgogne francophone
I am a Frank's LoL
The visigods were fighting the huns
no Friesland on the map
Sounds to me like the Frankish "Catholics" weren't all that in line with Rome. Delaying Baptism and practicing Polygamy were not start practice in Cachledonian Christianity.
They could be huns
Deutschland België Nederland France Lëtzebuerg 🇩🇪🇧🇪🇳🇱🇫🇷🇱🇺
We should unite again. 🤷♂️
Eroup pensula peroid Catholic Orthodox Basis
ChristenDom (whole pensula)
This is hilarious
FRANKS
Could “pax franca-romana” have been established throughout the entire space of the Roman Empire and its sphere of influence if General Arbogast, a valiant Frank, had managed to defeat the emperor Theodosius the Great in 394?
ua-cam.com/video/MLn_zwm3YXM/v-deo.html
We know the gauls were there
He didnt united all germanian
The vandals left the visigods were in spain
The frisians many left
Why start off mentioning Charlemagne? ...my God be more interersting.
Did nothing spectecular?
He is the stalwart defender of Europe, pushing back the Arabs at the battle of Tours.
You are the typical Anglo.
geroestetumor not arabs but berbers
Yea, Abdul Rahman was a berber...
transylvanian
He defended Europeans - the most important to defend.
The Romans betrayed their own with the citizen-laws of 212 AD.
Rome could not stand up to a few 'barbarians', hence was not worth defending. New Europen blood from the north had to come in to bring new life to the southern half of Europe. The Franks defended the Indo-European peoples on the European peninsula in the west, while the Bavarians and Slavs would perform their duty in southeastern Europe.
From the south came the Semites and Turks - either plundering their way through, even destroying whole cities in Iberia, with the Barbary pirates enslaving and leaving the Spanish coast vacant. After all, why did the scholars from Constantinople flee when the muslims came? Were the muslims not kind and civil, as you claim? Or did they proselytise by the sword?
And that golden age you believe in was short and added very little. Perhaps too much cultural marxism has sipped through to you? Might want to drop that left-wing bias, before our community pays the ultimate price for our altruism and Gutmensch-behaviour.
The ongoing conquest of western Europe by the muslims is spelling disaster; slums and no go areas are popping up in all the big cities - poverty and crime are rampant. Yet we are forced celebrate diversity and other races.
You look at history through a religious lens, either "Christian" or "Muslim" - yet both are a form of oriental mysticism. Religion - as with the rest of culture - is only the expression of a people's genes. Such a view would be labbeled 'racist', even though it explains the world to a 'T'.
As a Germanic I can say with ease that when Rome fell in the south, it was predominantly Germanic martiality that kept both the Semitic ideas, as well as the Semites and Turks, at bay. That is, unless you want to live in a fully semitised Europe. As a Transylvanian you should know who helped you out defending those mountain passes, bringing new life to the region.
You can view history all you like, but next time do some research into 'Medieval' history.
"Europeans - the most important to defend." I laughed at this so fuckin' hard, mate. Don't let everyone see your hand like that, right when people might've been ready to take you seriously. lmao +transylvanian - You've the patients of a saint, my friend. Keep fighting the good fight.
The failed Arab Sieges of Constantinople did far more to defend Europe against Arab conquest than the Battle of Tours, which was simply an Umayyad Raid. And the "Byzantines" actually had a civilization, unlike the Germanic kingdoms of the west which at best attempted to emulate Latin culture.
Why are there so many people in the comments freaking out about the exact names of every location?
For one thing, there have been 1,200-1,600 years of separation from these events, and also: who cares? It's not like Charles Martel is going to come back to life and correct this guy. Geez.
Thersites the Historian
Chek this names and words if you ar not smart as
PRIND albanian means ''Parent'' PRINC and PRINCES is Alb imo
FRANC the letter ''F'' is change with ''P'' .the letter ''A'' is change with ''I''
PARIS you se it comes from the word PARENT I PARI in ALB... means the FIRST
the franch man have this names they dont know what this means FARAC Alb.. PRIND
PARIS
I PARI in ALB.. the First is like Bukuresht in Romania BUKUR ESHT in alb,, means beatifull is
'''QAR'' means 'in Eng...'crack'' ,, ''KRAL''means ''KING'' slav ''car''king. QAR in Alb..crack eng..
QAR,T
krist
childer,ic 'qil'' means ''open'',,, ''der'' means ''dor''
THEUderic theu means break dor or ''break port''
Charlemagne family killed the merovingians pipin
Why the Muslims lose to Odo?...They were tou louse