What Is The Squanto In Your Life This Thanksgiving
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 лис 2023
- Kyle, Adam, Travis, and Emma celebrate Thanksgiving and answer soul-searching questions like what is the pilgrim and the squanto in their lives.
This episode is brought to you by Alliance Defending Freedom. Become a champion for freedom by standing with ADF today: joinadf.com/bee
Brothers in Christ from Namibia 🇳🇦...enjoying your show
Stirling proof that homeschooling teaches more history than public schools. As an "Unschooled" Homeschooler, I was wincing really hard for this one.
According to the Charlie Brown Thanksgiving Special, Squanto was an Indian who spoke English because he learned it from sailors. He used to live in the area around Plymouth, only everyone in his village got sick and died, so when the Pilgrims moved into his old neighborhood he asked if he could live with them.
Surprisingly accurate
@@-You-Tube- No reason not to be.
Look up Rush Limbaughs story of Thanksgiving.
The Mayflour compact agreement had all gatherings put in a store for all to share, but some didnt contribute as much, so they were failing.
Governor Bradford alloted each a plot of land to keep what they produced.
Bradford said (and all hands were productive) .
That is what they were thankfull for.
This podcast was my Squanto
The pilgrims had a peace treaty with the Indian chief massasoit and his tribe for 50 years. The treaty only ended when everyone from the original peace treaty generation had died. I mean that's pretty impressive. Also where the pilgrims landed there were no Indians living there at that time due to them all dieing from a sickness awhile before. Squanto was the only survivor and he chose to live with the pilgrims because he enjoyed them so much. So anyone giving the pilgrims history a hard time can go kick rocks.
Based history, I was desperately scrolling the comments hoping someone would.
I'm thankful there's finally a new Podcast!! 🎉
Emma for the win 🏅: "God, like the way you're supposed to do it"
Being as Catholics are more often on the receiving end of this question: "Where does it say that in the Bible?"
If you do a through survey of 'confession' in the Bible, it's generally either about confessing one's own sins or confessing gospel truths (or "confessing Christ"). You can find Biblical support for confessing truths to both God and men, but when it comes to confessing one's own sins, you will find verses about confessing sins to men or the wording is ambiguous about who exactly you are confessing them to. You won't find a direct command to "confess your sins to God" as being "the way you're supposed to do it".
@@John_Fisher
Didn't mean for my comment to offend anyone. I thought it was hilarious that Emma said this, which is what I believe to be true and I liked that they laughed about it too.
It's actually in various parts of the Bible. Jesus came to be the One High Priest. That's why the ways of the old testament were abandoned. The whole tabernacle, high priest, sacrifice for sins thing was put to an end by Jesus. Jesus was the ultimate High Priest and Perfect Sacrifice and with that, abolished the need for the said two. It's just what I've learned. My pastor, Jack Hibbs, had a great teaching series about this recently, "Who is Your High Priest?". It's available on UA-cam. There are many references to this, but one strong one is below:
I Timothy 2:5 NKJV
[5] For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus
Thanks for the civil reply 😊. God bless you, directly 😜
@@ItsMeTheDee Hi Dee, God bless you too.
I did not take offense from either Emma or you, but I do think that the underlying premise - that Protestants are right about this and Catholics are wrong - is funny in this case in that we can ask, 'why do you believe that is true? Where is that in the Bible?'
Because I absolutely agree that Jesus is our high priest and I absolutely agree with Paul in 1 Tim 2, but what Paul does not say and is not automatically entailed is, "Therefore, confess to God and not to any man." You need some line of thought and argumentation to get from this verse to that conclusion, because the verse isn't even saying anything about confession.
Again, in Protestant/Catholic dialog, when the Catholic says, "It doesn't directly say the thing that we teach, but here's the Biblical principles we can start with, and when we think about what they entail, we can see that it reaches the conclusion of what we teach," the Protestant will reply, "But the Bible doesn't actually say what you teach, it's just your 'vain sophistries' reaching that conclusion, where does it actually say that in the Bible?"
That's why it makes sense in this case to say, "Where does it actually say that in the Bible?" If it doesn't directly say that, fine, I'm open to considering the line of reasoning (more than the person who objects to 'vain sophistries' is), but I need something to see why I am expected to get to that conclusion from a verse that isn't addressing confession; on its own I do not see it as a strong verse to teach, "Confess to God only, not to any man."
@@John_Fisher
I totally agree that the Bible doesn't directly say that, but there are many other truths that it doesn't directly say. For example, The Bible doesn't directly say that God is 3 in one. We know that He is though, based on the many scriptures that allude to this.
Some of the other scriptures that I believe back up my beliefs are:
I John 1:7 NKJV
[7] But if we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanses us from all sin.
So it is Christ who cleanses us from sin.
I also don't understand the need to go to a priest. Not sure how he decides what the penance is. After all, he is also a sinner, so why is he worthy of it. According to scripture, we are all sinners.
Romans 3:23-24 NKJV
[23] for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, [24] being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus,
So, I'm not saying you're wrong to confess to a priest. I just don't know why it's necessary, when we can go directly to Christ.
Unfortunately I can't answer this properly, but I think Pastor Hibbs's teaching series addresses it. Not sure if you'd want to check it out. The title is "No Pastor, Priest, Pope or King" based on the book of Hebrews by Jack Hibbs. Something tell me we can probably keep going back and forth on this. It's cool though that we're both passionate about our beliefs.
I hope you have a Happy Thanksgiving!
Babylon Bee, look what you've done! 🤪
@@ItsMeTheDee Hi Dee! I did have a great Thanksgiving, thanks. My grandmother said she was happy to host but has increasingly found it more and more stressful doing the cooking over the years, so I took over as head chef and told her she could just enjoy spending time with the family; with some help the meal came together without a hitch thankfully!
I hope your Thanksgiving was good as well!
I actually do agree that the Bible doesn't have to directly say something for it to be an important truth of the faith. Again, the irony is that while Catholics by and large take this as a given, it's a substantial amount of Protestants who will insist that if it isn't directly made clear in the Bible then they can't be made to accept it. Of course this is just some Protestants, not all, and you might not be one of them. Many Protestants will agree that they at least need to also believe anything that can be shown to be a 'necessary consequence' of what the Bible says; maybe this would better describe your position. I appreciate that you are not saying I am wrong to confess to a priest.
But again, it's funny that if anyone is saying, "Look, here's a valid line of reasoning that takes accepted truths and reaches this conclusion," and someone who is saying, "I don't have to accept that vain sophistry, if it's not stated directly in the Bible" it's usually the other way around in Protestant/Catholic dialog.
That's why it's just a joke for me to say "where is that in the Bible" and pretend that this ends the matter, to show that there's a double-standard at play when Emma makes a joke at the expense of mocking Catholics to say that they are choosing to not do what they should do, when she's the one taking the claim, "You should confess sins to God and not men," as a given when it is not stated in the Bible.
In reality, I am open to consider and respond to lines of reasoning that show that support this claim, but I don't see the passages you referenced as really getting there. Often times, we bring in our preconceived notions and don't realize that we are taking something as a given that the person we are talking to doesn't; that's why I ask for a line of reasoning - I want to see one premise, followed by another until we reach the conclusion, so that I can see how you got there. For example:
The first verse you referenced is "I John 1:7" as supporting the idea that, "We should confess to God an not to men." But this verse doesn't have anything to do with confessing. I agree with everything it says, and I'm happy to look at the context of what John is discussing to understand what he is getting at; but the verse you referenced doesn't even address confessing - the ones around it are more relevant.
You concluded from the passage: "So it is Christ who cleanses us from sin." So it seems like you have the impression that the reason Catholics do believe that we should confess sins to men is that we don't believe that it is Christ who cleanses us from sin. It seems like you have in mind a line of reasoning that you believe Catholics follow, where Christ does not cleanse us from sin and we conclude that we should confess sins to God and not men. Do you believe that Catholics do not believe that Christ cleanses us from sin? Can you explain the line of reasoning that you think Catholic follow?
We can go over the other verses you referenced and I can try to better understand why you think they represent your position. But first I'd like make sure we're clear on this one and get your response on my questions about it. That way I can better understand what you're trying to say before moving on.
My husband is as pale as pale can be. I mean Lily white. His DNA shows hes is English Irish.. Recently we got a notification that said Pocahontas was his grandmother numerous generations back. We got a good laugh out of that. He would be the last you would think had Indian in him. because he is so white.
Travis was correct about priests and confession. Priest go to confession just as anyone else does, and there is no ranking system where you go to someone who is "superior to you." The pope can go to any other priest for confession.
From someone unfamiliar, one might get the impression that confession involves going to a superior and being forced to 'come clean with them', but this practices shows that this is not the case. Rather, the priest is someone who is ministering to you and everyone, including priests, go to someone who is called to minister them in that fashion.
The deepest account of the first thanksgiving is so amazing... God was placing people to fullfill the covenant on this land where the greatest rufuge of freedom in history has been established and will yet be established in fullness. Christ and His faithful will lead joyfuly in the city of the New Jerusalem....
I know I say this every podcast but I still don’t understand getting rid of Bee Weekly. Personally, I cared much more about what was happening at BB because of the podcast. You guys slip my mind much more frequently these days.
That Signed Kevin Sorbo picture 🎉😅
If you're interested, read or listen to Rush Limbaugh's children's book "Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims."
If the bear is black, fight back. If the bear is brown, lie down.
Our memory. BEFORE TERROR, AFTER TERROR. They are the same and both equally in terror of the people. The perpetrators are still at large.
A pilgrim is someone who moves to another country to escape religious persecution.
St Patrick's Day is Irish Envy for sure.
I'm guessing Travis chose that mug ironically!?
Also, this is the Bee A team right here!!
Momma was born in Portland, OR. We would still have Oyster Casserole were she still with us. Clams, Oysters, Geoduck. Mom rocked.
Fun fact, I use the Gilligan's Island characters to remember the Seven Deadly sins
Pilgrims are travellers on a holy mission.
Gandalf was referred to as "The Grey Pilgrim", by the elves if I'm not mistaken.
Emma, the history is good!!!
Am i the only one that got the IT crowd reference?
I bless thee for the soul thou hast created,
for adorning it, sanctifying it, though it is fixed in barren soil; for the body thou hast given me, for preserving its strength and vigour, for providing senses to enjoy delights, for the ease and freedom of my limbs, for hands, eyes, ears that do thy bidding; for thy royal bounty providing my daily support, for a full table and overflowing cup, for appetite, taste, sweetness, for social joys of relatives and friends, for ability to serve others, for a heart that feels sorrows and necessities, for a mind to care for my fellow-men, for opportunities of spreading happiness around, for loved ones in the joys of heaven, for my own expectation of seeing thee clearly. I love thee above the powers of language to express, for what thou art to thy creatures.
Increase my love, O my God, through time and eternity.
- Valley of Vision
William Bradford diary.
The Noble Savage trope presents Western influence on non-Western cultures as the source of all of their problems. The Last Samurai is a good example. It's also popular with Marxists and their fellow travelers because it's another way to blame Western capitalism for introducing concepts like greed, war, slavery, etc., to otherwise pure and good societies, despite the fact that all of those things long predate the concept of the West.
Actually you have no idea how time goes so fast until you lose a child!!! Then at one point you have to say it’s 12 years that your baby has been gone!!! Time does go by soooooo fast and really not so fast.
This one was a hot mess! I'm a fan but . . .whew.
No kidding, I was so disappointed at the level of historical ignorance. I like the Bee, but sheesh!
Regarding Emma's comment on confessing "to God, like the way you're supposed to do it."
Being as Catholics are more often on the receiving end of this question, it's worth asking here: "Where does it say that in the Bible?"
If you do a through survey of 'confession' in the Bible, it's generally either about confessing one's own sins or confessing gospel truths (or "confessing Christ"). You can find Biblical support for confessing truths to both God and men, but when it comes to confessing one's own sins, you will find verses about confessing sins to men or the wording is ambiguous about who exactly you are confessing them to. You won't find a direct command to "confess your sins to God" as being "the way you're supposed to do it".
C'mon guys! The BB is supposed to be mega based, but cant even be bothered to learn the history of one of our nation's most important traditions? Sad, Not good. Do better, Bee.
Travis is a pilgrim, not the pope!
Due to its roots in anti-semitic culture. Christmas will be canceled this year. 😢
😂😂 Nothing says "anti-semetic" like a religion that acknowledges a jewish man is the son of God!
Indians, Native Americans, Indigenous People, First Nations - they all have issues. I have some Native American ancestry. I also have European ancestry. I'm a mutt, not a purebred (and truly, purebred = inbred). Frankly, some people look for a reason to be offended so they can belong to some kind of special class of people that makes them better than other people in some way. I don't care either way. Native Americans were made of various tribes, none of whom were the first people living in the land they inhabited. I say: use the names of tribes you know the name of when you are talking about particular tribes. Otherwise, use whatever name for the larger group of people in general in whatever way best communicates with whoever you're trying to communicate. Don't get hung up on using whatever politically correct name there is because that's a moving target anyway. You aren't going to say something that isn't going to offend someone, so it's no use trying.