Breazeale Nuclear Reactor Start up, 500kW, 1MW, and Shut Down (ANNOTATED)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 бер 2017
- By popular demand, I bring you an annotated video of the Breazeale Nuclear Reactor! The sound is fixed and many things are explained.
If you have any questions or want elaboration on any part of this video, please leave a comment. I love explaining nuclear power to curious people.
I look forward to reading your comments!
PS: I'm aware of spelling errors in the video (I am an engineer ya know). No need to point them out.
Music is a non-copyright track by DM Galaxy titled "Etiquette."
/ dm-galaxy-etiquette-or...
ORIGINAL VIDEO: • Breazeale Nuclear Reac...
CHERENKOV RADIATION VIDEO: • Video
REACTOR FACILITY INFORMATION: • Penn State Breazeale N... - Наука та технологія
"Alexa"
"Mood lighting please, 3.6 roentgen"
Everyone in the Chernobyl reactor room
Surprised pikachu face
*exhales air through nose*
Okay, setting lighting profile to "not good, not terrible"
@@chillylytical9410 didn't laugh
Not good.. but not bad
These new PC rigs and what it takes to cool them are just insane.
Yeah, my PC is RGB all sea coloured and looks just like this in the night, haha
And graphics haven't even improved that much from 2007.
Yeah like these new quantum and nuclear computers
Ever heard a pc fridge?
Yea it already existed ever since the 90's
XDDD
One of the few things in our real world that looks as sci-fi as it sounds.
I love it
All of this thanks to Dyatlov
As I am just an average person who enjoys science in all its forms, this was a great educational video. Never in my life did I expect to see a nuclear reactor in both start up and shutdown mode.
A very precise process. A matter of inches can be the difference between normal operation and super critical.
It was dumb as fuck. The video lost me when he stated that the blue light comes from electrons moving faster than light...
@@noizW Oh WoW, you just qualified to be nominated for the Nobel Prize for DF's
Everybody's gangsta till the Rods start jumping up and down violently.
HAHAHAH THIS CRACKED ME UP
Marcel Rodriguez lol
What it's just lots of bubbles
which, i'm told, is impossible
you copied comment from other video poor boy
That blue color it gives off is horrifyingly beautiful though. 5 stars radiation. Truly an outstanding performance
Not great, not terrible*
Where
That is not 5 stars of radiation
That blue light is “Cherenkov radiation”
What that guy said. Iirc, cherenkov radiation is not very dangerous.
The clarity of that water is astonishing, I've never seen water so clean & clear before, in such a large volume
I imagine the 1MW of heat plus all the neutron and gamma rays go along way to keeping the water clean. I imagine they also have to keep the water very clean as it's used for research purposes.
The water have to be clean. If there's any salts or unknown ions in the water they will over time make deposits on the side of the reactor walls, which will decrease the heat transmission coefficient, making the water less good at cooling. Most powerplants use deuterium (heavy water/D2O) as cooling and neutron moderator, which has to be very pure.
@@rasmus1600 This isn't a power generating reactor, it's a university research reactor.
@@rasmus1600 I know, I'm not questioning why it has to be so clean. I'm just simply amazed by it.
@@asvarien Even if it isn't generating power, the water needs to cool the reactor.
As a PSU student, it was an absolute privilege to be able to tour this facility a few weeks ago and see the reactor operating with my own eyes. Seeing the blue glow of Cherinkov radiation is genuinely one of the most beautiful sights I've ever seen.
Im really jealous right now.
You’re right. Though only bad thing is I grew an extra arm and a few extra digits by the time the tour was over.
@@MaSa-bp5qe Ayo
Nice pfp, can apreciate
I thought it meant that orcs were nearby.
What you see when you overclock a Core 2 Duo to 5 GHz 😂
This is what it looks like right before the white light
@@chabka34 😂
Nope, that poor cpu will go boom like the Reactor 4
HAHAS
@@SuperBram77 😂
It's pretty amazing that all this power comes from simply bringing a natural element into close proximity with itself.
Yes one that's been highly refined and enriched
Even more amazing when you bring a man and a woman in the proximity of each other!
@@hkasia8139 True chemistry.
@@Obshowersyndicate It has happened in nature before. There is such a thing as a natural nuclear reactor underground.
@@LarsLarsen77 yes it's call the earth
I worked for Commonwealth Edison in Illinois for 17 years as a mobile maintenance mechanic at the Will County Station 18 plant in Romeoville, IL. I traveled to Dresden Nuclear plant many times over during those 17 years for refueling and other maintenance outages. I got to see the fuel pool which had a beautiful cobalt blue glow. I also changed out and rebuilt fuel rod drives. I had a mental understanding of what was going on while the reactor was running but this is the first time I've seen that process. Thanks for sharing this.
That’s quite amazing, what did it take( like the process) to be able to work there?
I’ve always wanted to become a nuclear engineer myself so I’m just curious 👍
I learned more from this video than I did from all my physics lessons in school combined! Thank you UA-cam Algorythm
You're welcome for providing the algorithm with a video that you enjoyed!
A perfect pool heater. Where do I get one?
@@DanielTseng100 As well as the International Atomic Energy knocking on your door asking about your new high tech pool heater while handcuffing you
@@DanielTseng100 how is he gonna buy one when he can barely afford a pair of socks?
@@DanielTseng100 bawhahaha
Chernobyl
It comes with blue pool lighting also
Now start revving it a little bit, let's hear that bad boy.
*BOOM*
_uh_ _oh_
Nuclear reactors don't blow like a nuke, but that doesn't me they can't go "nuclear" and create a massive steam/nuclear waste explosion
@dick_kickem 420 IIRC that wasn't an explosion but a meltdown, still devastating nontheless
@dick_kickem 420 for the sake of the argument, the explosion was steam based, not nuclear. you basically drop a super hot rock into a cooking pot and close the lid real fast, it goes boom.
technically the water/steam was radioactive, but it's not a nuclear explosion.
so the explosion was not nuclear, then it was on fire for a bit, which was the main problem as far as radioactive contamination goes.
tl;dr it was radioactive material on fire, not a nuclear explosion, the explosion was steam.
basically the argument is: you got boiled in water, not fried in oil. same-ish result, one's slightly less worse than the other.
@@dacomputernerd4096 did he say nuclear explosion? no... so who asked you?
One of the best and most interesting videos i have ever seen. Thank you so much!
Props to the camera man for sitting underwater for so long
Fr I heard they can hold their breath forever
what's more outstanding about this is the fact the cameraman didn't get affected by the radiation!
@@GhaileruodealThis man is one of Chernobyl’s liquidators, radiation is a laughing matter for him
@@sayhallo3769all the Chernobyl liquidators have either already died or they are already choosing a coffin for themselves because they are already over 78 years old
@@Ghaileruodealhe won’t suffer because most of the neutrons don’t reach him, the water distorts the distance from the core to the operator, there was about 34-44 meters of water or even more
I'm so happy that we live in a world where Cherenkov radiation is conveniently visible under normal underwater reactor operation so we can witness that beautiful blue glow
It is so beautiful when you are not looking directly at it
@@cacadorcurioso7224 it’s said in the video that you actually can look directly at it because of the shielding provided by the water, but of course I expect that you can’t stay three hours watching at the reaction and not at 1MW
For real. I just got around to watching Chernobyl and wishing I could see what that blue glow would look like in real life, and lo and behold this shows up in my recommended haha
@@dayabloom9634 Well I suppose technically you’re not still looking directly at it because the water is between you and it.
@@TiqueO6 by your definition one still wouldn't be 'looking directly' at it if there weren't water because there'd be air in between
i just watched Chernobyl and UA-cam's algorithm went batshit crazy
Stanley Pines bro that shit gave me ptsd
Was it the Americans?
You’re delusional! Take yourself to the infermiary
I never even heard of it, and UA-cam put it on my front page.
Glad I'm not the only one
Absolutely amazing. I just learned more about nuclear power from one video than I have read about my whole life. For me, video speaks louder than words. Thanks!
There is nothing more beautiful than seeing a reactor running in person. I was lucky enough to work in and around the reactor at Oak Ridge NL and the experience will live with me forever. So many stories and observations of the site itself as well as the reactor. Very cool part of history and visually stunning to see the glow.
*reactor starts glowing*
AKIMOV WHAT DID YOU DO
Reactor starts bouncing
Vodka cooled reactor Vadyim, is very simple.
@@lucasgomestamba1791 not great not terrible
@@gilbermarcelo7244 not great BUT TERRIBLE
You morons blew the tank
The reactor makes trance music while starting up and shutting down.
And luckily it’s non copyrighted trance!
@@AlexLandress I genuinely for a moment thought its the sound from the control rods :)
@@RajarajanPanneerselvam same
Given some of the elements in there you'd think it'd play heavy metal
@@andrewdavies1312 or Death Metal
Thanks so much for this demo Alex, I've always been fascinated by nuclear power, and of course had my reservations, but as I learn more and more, I'm understanding more about the unwarranted demonising of it. BRILLIANT STUFF SIR! 👍👍
The individual reactor design determines a lot of the safety risks involved. That and waste disposal. Events like Chernobyl and even the more recent Fukishima incident involved outdated somewhat outdated technology and newly built reactors are said to be significantly safer (especially compared to RBMK used in Chernobyl). That being said nuclear technology will always have some risks - those risks however are often less than those of other power sources including hydroelectric damns that have killed more people than reactor incidents. I also think reactor design can be further improved and made even safer with enough research, we already have ideas on how to do this but don't have the funding.
I started working refuel outages, and between outage construction, at a few nuclear powerhouses as a JW electrician in 1989. I have since retired, but I was able to work practically everywhere at the plants. However, I never got the chance to see the blue glow in person, but others did. Thanks for showing me, and explaining, what goes on.
One HBO series and every1 is a nuclear scientist commenting on reactor core youtube videos 😂
and here you are
All I’m suggesting is that 3.6 Roentgen is not great but not terrible.
All we're saying is that it's only 3.6 roentgen. Not great but not terrible.
@@rts100x5 Get to the infirmary, you're delusional 🤣
you don't need to be specially smart to understand the basic idea of a reactor and the atomic reaction...
Nuclear reactors you can study/relax to [LIVE]
Lofi/HipHop Nuclear Meltdown you can relax to! [🛑]
In the desert of Chernobyl references, this was a much needed oasis of humor.
Lofi/Hip-hop relaxing world war 2 sounds + after credits nuclear reactor to study and relax to [LIVE]
Can you make that plz
Thank you, at 68 years old I felt as though I was in a class at M.I.T. Bravo I am grateful to see something I might never have seen. Thank you for a first rate production! 🐯🐯🐯🐯 not too important but a nickname The Old Tiger.
Bloody awesome video. The pace and explanations are perfect. Thank you!
I went here on a school field trip once
It was elementary school so nobody understood literally anything they tried to teach us
That’s a perfectly good waste of a field trip
@@rickyheath7607 What field trips did you have? They probably made you go to the park right across from your school.
@@carlosserna_boi921 I'm going to Iceland on a field trip, and still would rather have gone to see a nuclear reactors
69th like
@@rocket2739 nice
They should have a speaker that plays the windows XP power on and power off sound when it turns on and off
Underrated comment
They do actually, but you can't hear it underwater.
or 98
chernobyl
@@OnlyTwoShoes Why not? I know pools that have underwater speakers that play music.
Excellent Demonstration! Thanks for posting!
Oh hi Juan. Didn't expect to see you here!
I saw dozens same video about reactors start and shutdown and found this one is coolest due to explanations for all questions I had while whatching for easy understanding. Thanks
"Hey Ferb, I know what to do today!"
Chernobyl ensues
I'm honestly surprised they never built a nuclear reactor on that show. Compared to half the things they built it would be child's play.
Programmer Cat But if done correctly, there’s no reason for there to be an explosion (which wouldn’t actually be a nuclear explosion, the fuel in a nuclear reactor is too poor in fissile uranium-235 for that to happen).
@@GRBtutorials would have been too controversial. Sad since we let fear stop us from going nuclear.
@@aminsaw7564 : You're mistaken, RBMK reactors don't explode!
"Blue light prevents you from sleep"
Me: Cherenkov Radiation?
From a certain point of view it would stop you, but not only from sleeping, but from breathing 😂
Not really, Cherenkov is produced by FTL through a solid/liquid. It's deadly in the aspect as gamma radiation is, which a device screen does not produce.
If you get enough, it’ll put you to sleep for good. 🤣
@@aeureus true, but if you observe Cherenkov radiation in the air or water around you, your weekend plans are pretty much over. I'm aware of only a handful of times people witnessed that phenomena that way, three during the Manhattan Project and in a criticality incident in a Japanese fuel processing plant.
I did chuckle about checking the camera for activation, as they'd be a wee bit above 1 MW to get that kind of neutron flux at that distance in water. But, the tests are standard and mandatory. One thing I do remember about the NRC, they're utterly inflexible in safety procedures.
@@spvillano The NRC is basically a terrorist organization. They are such scumbags I don't know why nobody has done anything to stop them in the decades they have been spreading misinformation and destroying the nuclear industry.
I could meditate to this. Stunning, thanks for sharing and the information!
I have to come back to this video from time to time. It's genuinely one of the coolest things I've ever seen.
*Watches one miniseries*
You know, I'm something of a nuclear scientist myself
Comrade dyatlov , it's unsafe .....
@@shreyas2730 you didn't see graphite
YOU DIDN'T!!!!!
BECAUSE IT'S NOT THERE
@@sannidhyabalkote9536 it's not good ..... It's not terrible either
There was a young lady named Bright
Who traveled far faster than light.
She went out one day
In a RELATIVE way
And returned the previous night.
-Reginald Buller
He wrote this about the Tachyon, a hypothetical subatomic particle, that travels faster than light. Predicted by the mathematics of Einstein’s relativity.
great
Hehe Tachyon egg
Imagine returning before even leaving
Does that mean that tachyons are the answer to time travel?
*“Is Dr. Bright allowed to travels faster than the speed of light in the foundation?”*
Joke aside, it's a nice comment ^^
WoW a good video. This is my first time to see a Nuclear Reactor . So small and so many PowerI have ever thinking, its bigger.Thanks for this Video
My son as a student at Penn State and I got to tour the reactor and look down directly into pool seeing the blue glow from the reactor. Pretty amazing stuff.
_"Conrade, I've seen it. The core it's open!"_
*When the core is open:*
Comrade
He's in shock, get him out of here.
@@comradedyatlov4143 What did you DOOO!
3.6 not great, not terrible
Creepiest scene from the show. Without any context, you just KNOW "No human is supposed to EVER see this"
Don't know exactly why this showed up in my suggested today, but not gonna lie, I'm glad it did.
Easily one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen on UA-cam!
Just stumbled across this, very very fascinating, thanks for having us!
What crossed my mind was the question... When those control rods are made of neutron absorbing material, can they become "full"? Do they have to be exchanged sometime?
No, they just heat up.
*"Can you tell me how a RBMK reactor works underwater?"*
Not greatly, not terribly
HoovyzePoot That’s a high caliber answer holy fuck.
Toptunov, raise power to 1 Mw!
@@therandomytchannel4318 У Топтунова даже такой цены деления в 1МВт не было на щите управления. У него был аппарат в 3000МВт тепловой мощности. А это какой то примус.
@@0_741 what the fuck did you just said AKIMOV
This really goes to show that Nuclear Reactor technology really doesn’t deserve the bad reputation it gets, especially with the modern designs we have for them. Most of the reactors that have had issues in the past were literally designed 60-70 years ago. Think about how much technology has advanced in that time... we can do better.
Its not that nuclear technology is dangerous, as you said, technology is advance enough that something happening like in Chernobyl is highly unlikely..
The concerne is danger from natural causes, like what happened in Fukushima. We dont know what future holds, some catastrophe on bigger scale will happen sooner or later, and then we might have serious problems with those reactors and nuclear waste.
Which also is another concerne, nuclear waste, besides Finland, nobody else permanently store their nuclear waste for now.. Waste is being hold in the power planet itself, or on some locations, but not permanently sealed and buried, and in that state is always potentialy dangerous..
@Hamburglar the exiled yup
Nuclear reactor technology definitely deserves its bad reputation. When operators are constantly vigilant and abiding by all safety procedures, everything's gravy. But it only takes one time for something to fail or somebody to make a mistake and shit goes south extremely fast. Both Fukushima and Chernobyl proved that. Fukushima even had safety backups with backups after them. Mother nature fucked all that up.
@@Rob-hv5zq Fukushima was a bad plant with very bad location and absolutely inadequate safety precautions for earthquakes and tsunami's.
@@Rob-hv5zq Actually stuff cant go down south really fast in modern reactors. Chernobyl was a catastrophe by design which was only able to happen duo to the use the nowadays very outdated solid fission moderator Graphite and the use of only 2% enriched Uranium (instead of commonly used 3-5% which is more expensive) so the catastrophy wouldnt have been a suprise if looked at from nowadays perspective.
Fukushima is a nuclear reactor build on the edge of one of the most earthquake torn islands.
I cannot imagine a case of a modern nuclear reactor going boom if its not right at the edge of a continental plate.
You can run planes into them and the fission reaction is self controlled duo to the design of the reactor, if every worker in a nuclear facility suddenly died the reactors would happily keep on running until fission stops, cooling and moderation is self sustained and unless not explicitly told to do so otherwise by human intervention (or the water pool having a leak...) the fission will decrease not increase.
This may seem odd, but I love the underwater sounds as the camera is lowered.
UA-cam suggested this vid to me and I'm happy it did. I always love learning something new.
WOW WOW WOW fantastic video. I'm not as afraid of nuclear energy production as I watch these types of videos.
Her: I'm sure he's cheating on me
Him and the boys:
Lmao
Putting his control rods in someone else
@@shuggg5646 lol
When he gets home he gets checked for contamination and activation
Why are we talking about memes here? This is for scientists only, not people who love this bumblefuckery we call "memes".
"Alright kids, now we are going to do it again but without the water"
Um, I just remembered I left the oven on at home, and um, I'm afraid I'll have to miss that experiment
I’m not sure if it would work. Water is the moderator to slow the neutrons down to allow them to successfully hit another fissile atom. Now if there was graphite there as well, that would be a different story.
@@davidsteer8142 thanks a good explanation
No water? No moderation and likely wouldn't sustain a chain reaction
@@budgreen4x4 shhhhh! It's funny to the non-nuclear engineers! Don't ruin it for them!
Thanks for uploading this rarely observable unique happening.
I really sat here and watch a spicy cube glow for 10 minutes.
i will likely never need this information on my life, but you can be sure I watched the whole thing
Look, I studied Nuclear Physics from the hit show Chernobyl from HBO, you might say that I am indeed qualified for this type of matter.
Hat _ lmao dude
Hat _ You’re delusional! Take yourself to the infermiary
And you might also say 3 roentgens is not great, not terrible either.
@@f.r.285 Indeed Comrade.
"I'm a bit of a nuclear physicist myself" -Green Goblin dude
This is really fascinating to watch thankyou for sharing this. I also just realized this was from 2017. Still really cool!
0:01 welcome to timed beta, have some snacks 🍿
This is just footage of a modern Intel processor.
LMFAO
Yeah, as it does not produce anything but heat.
500 Mw TDP
More like the 5600x
@@f-22raptor25 ?? the 5600X caps out at like 80W lol. Meanwhile the equivalent Intel proc is twice that
It actually glows blue and it's not even a gimmick. So amazing
Blue is my fav colour so imma eat it
@@jayjaysheroah2485 Am gonna sniff it hardly
@@ocristianoronaldo8294 u need help
My dad use to weld the aluminum cooling pipes on a small test reactor in the DC area back in the 80s . One day the plant operator showed him the reactor core he said he was never more scared in his life. He says the glow was almost purple but eyes were getting pretty bad from all the years of welding
@@Obshowersyndicate Those commercial plants can produce as much as 2 GW of power; so... 6 GW is about 6000 times more oomph than this little darling.
What a great video including all these explanations! Thank you!
I’m no scientist, or anything close to it, other than some environmental remediation background, but I find stuff like this very fascinating. This video had me captured for 10 minutes.
Glad you enjoyed it!
'Me trying to sleep:
UA-cam Algorithm: "want to know how to start a nuclear reactor !?"
Me: Yes. Yes I do.
Me: Yes i do. LETS Build ONE!! 10 sec. Lader: (lieing on the floor because of radiation positioning)
Your sleep paralysis demon be like "DAMN, thwarted by UA-cam AGAIN!"
It feels like it's always the same people commenting the same thing under every video
A bit more complicated than this lol
The 117 people who disliked are in shock
Get them out of here
infirmary
I’ve seen worse
Yay 666th comment
Hi little fascist! Why only "get them out"? I bet you want them to be dead huh?
Well that escalated quickly LUL
The annotations added a lot to this video, thank you.
Fascinating every time I watch this.. Also the best video by far.
For those wondering it is going faster than the speed of light in water but not faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.
If i am not wrong i think in perfect vacuum, there is by definition no matter. So no electrons to be ejected at high speed from their atoms by the gamma particles from the reactor's core. So i think the question of the Cherenkov effect is pointless in vacuum.
Bruh what are you on
@@AdriStouse Vacuum's still have particles.
Casimir effect, and no true vacuum exists anyway, though experimentally could be considered statistically void of matter.
It is not pointless to make the distinction of water vs vacuum as it is about lightspeed references on the wavefront. The whole point is to not make people think electrons are literally going true FTL. It's just a reference map, quite standardised in mathematics, engineering and physics.
@@richardlepoulo9694 Gen Z is here.. joy
@Bill Bopperton oh boy, you've got to lay off the news and quit the generation stigma - I bet back in your day they were doing the same BS; just accept you're antiquated and make peace with it instead of demonizing the evolution of language and the next generations' way forward
"I got in touch with a friend of mine who works at a research reactor, and asked him what he thought would happen to you if you tried to swim in their radiation containment pool.
'In our reactor?” He thought about it for a moment. “You’d die pretty quickly, before reaching the water, from gunshot wounds.'"
obligatory xkcd quote
cancer
@authorization batman yeesh someone didn't have their breakfast
@authorization batman you're kind of a dick. Not only did the joke fly over your head but you had to be an ass about it too
@authorization batman BUTTHURT ALERT
@@shutupnerd9694 will you answer the question? I really want know what would happen
The reactor is way smaller than I would have ever imagined it. Pretty neat stuff!! 👍
The future will be a world where something like that the size of a Coca-Cola can will power our house
Awesome! The power of the atom! Thanks for the video! Really interesting!
It's only a 3.6 roentgen. I'm told it's the equivalent of a chest X-ray
3.6 Roentgen per hour? Take him to the infirmary, he's delusional.
Not great, not terrible.
You are confused RBMK reactor cores don't explode
@@TitanD79 I've seen worse.
Soundtracks161 This copy and paste unoriginal comment is already old, stop beating it with a stick you lame fuck
"Okay class who wants to jump in the pool for extra credit? I know 70% of you are borderline failing so I should have plenty of volunteers."
Swaggaccino funny part is other than the radiation it would probably be perfectly fine if not a bit warm due to the energy dissipating only really dangerous if you go right up and touch the reactor
At least I think so nuclear physicists please correct me
@@supapoopatroopa6882 Exactly. If you went within a couple feet of the reactor it would end very badly, but at the top of the pool (19 feet away) or just under the surface? Probably less radiation than outside the pool. what-if.xkcd.com/29/
@@StormsparkPegasus You beat me to posting that.
@@supapoopatroopa6882 My friend worked at a nuke plant. If someone drops something in the suppression pool a diver has to go get it, and I don't think they do a full shutdown. Even if they do the reactor is still full of material.
ACID VIDEO!!!! 😮👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻❤
Thx for that experience and data👌🏻
This is fascinating and educational. Thank you!
From discovering fire to this, It always blows my mind to think what humans are capable of.
there are many theories that we got some inspiration from other "sources"
Aliens
There are still many fascinating technologies to be discovered in the future now this is a fission reaction I wonder if we could commercialize fusion reaction
This is way more impressive than discovering fire considering fire can be observed to naturally happen.
@@FordSierraIS Not theories, just speculation.
I'm here for my daily dose of 3.6 Roentgens.
I heard it's only about one chest x-ray
Not good , not horrifying
I've seen worse.
3.6? Not great, not terrible.
Are you due for an chest X Ray?
It is impressive how they move the shielding just a little bit and it doubles the heat power.
As someone who has only a minimal understanding of this process, seeing this is both terrifying and fascinating. Thank you for the annotation. I saw another video showing startup of some reactors, and there was no annotation at all, so it was difficult for a non-nuclear person to know it was going on since. Having worked with engineers, I would never expect you to be able to spell everything correctly.😊
alternative title: testing my nuclear reactor in my pool.
@@PelonMusk who hurt you, my boy
even though the pool is big, a megawatt of heat would get it toasty warm pretty quickly. 👍🏼
DIY,and very cheap,i made it with some spares i had from other projects or found in the trash,so very cheap.
"I made a test on the air turbines of my nuclear reactor and this is what happened XD"
There you go!
The lid is off, the stack is burning, I saw it.
He’s in shock, get him out of here.
You're delusional, take him to the infirmary.
the feedwater is mildly contaminated. He'll be fine. I've seen worse
Did you lower the control rods or not?
@@Akeldama9 *. Dry reaches... doubles over... dry reaches some more...*.
comrad dyatlov...
COMRAD DYATLOV!
This was really neat to learn about. Thank you!
Thank you alex for this great video
When the camera was pulled out, it has an extra lens.
👈😂😂
Lmao
hope you dont have extra anything when doing the same thing
Maybe that’s why the new iPhones have three lenses
3-eyed fish lol.
"You didn't see graphite on the ground because it's not there, CHANGE MY MIND"
*pukes*
You're delusional
Take him to the infirmary
No, no: he's got a point.
_We would rather go and have a sandwich._
See? This one knows!
Thanks for this video and the notation. It was very interesting. I’ve been reading James Mahaffey’s fascinating books on the history of nuclear energy and it’s awesome to see what a working nuclear reactor actually looks like!
Thank you too much for your excellent share...
"Thats cherenkov effect, completely normal phenomenon. I have seen worse "
Its the tesseract effect.
@@BenPortermike hes quoting a line from hbo chernobyl
@@BenPortermike woooosh
@@59Foxhound you cant woosh someone who does not get a reference, a reference is not a joke + he was making one of his own
Comrade Dyatlov?
Jesus christ, there are just too many comments about HBO Chernobyl series... gotta take every one to the infirmary, they're delusional.
Take _"The Law" to the medic please
The Law i see what you did there :))
rmbk rector did blewup and core melted , memed soviet stooge ask how did it blew up
You know, if that series spurs an interest in some people to learn more about physics - good!
I didn't see a post from Mr. Christ??
Excellent video, especially for me or someone like me who knows absolutely zero about how anything nuclear (for electricity) works.
Very cool and informative. Thanks. 👍🏻😊
An absolutely stunning video!!!
Imagine being able watch a nuclear reaction happening
You need to go outside sometimes
@@sungazer454 lmao
Looks at sun
@@sungazer454 your name makes this even more hilarious
@@sungazer454 actually the sun uses nuclear fusion which creates alot more energy then the fission that reactors use
2:35 imagine being so fast instead of a sonic boom you create a photonic boom
Fun fact: if a macroscopic object were moving at "can generate light booms" speeds it would be fussing particles on, and ablating, its forward facing side. It would basically be a moving nuclear explosion untill the object is either consumed or obliterated.
Yes, I am a blast at parties.
@@zombieregime Don't forget Unruh radiation to melt it down.
Actually, that is possible. Named “sonoluminescense”, its natural occurrence is from the punch of a mantis shrimp. There’s also footage of some successful experiments getting bubbles to implode and create (very dim) flashes of light.
@@comicsansgreenkirby that's an entirely different phenomenon.
"Before we begin the tour, I must ask: why do you have your phone hooked to a fishing pole?"
"Don't worry about it".
Fascinating, brilliant, and terrifying all at the same time
This is by far the best video I've ever seen of a reactor running. When I saw the original video without annotations I just had to link it on my FB Page. I've always had a fascination with atomic power and always love watching reactor vids and this just knocked it out of the park. Seriously, Thank You for sharing!
The last time I saw a video of a nuclear reactor in operation, things didn't turn out well.
@@samarvora7185 You're just a rod jumping GANGSTER Samar!
Finally, someone before HBO Chernobyl
Cherenkov radiation is such an amazing blue hue.
Imagine being the workers inside Chernobyl the night the reactor blew its top. One of the workers described "a beautiful blue laser stretching to the heavens".
@@MrWolfSnack Id imagine it would be very much brighter since the reactors output was orders of magnitude more than here. But the cost of admission is a bit pricey.
@@MrWolfSnack Is that actually the case, because that seems like bullshit to me...
@@kanekeylewer5704 I know I'm not the person you asked, but oh well. After quite a bit of research on the Chernobyl disaster, I found several witness reports stating something similar, if not that directly. The radiation coming from the exploded core was high enough to kill most of the workers who obliviously went close enough to it, even behind walls, or down in the reactor pumps. It was definitely enough to initiate a large Cherenkov effect.
@@Jeremiah-mj9kw Seems cool as fuck. Its one of those things that is really beautiful but scary as shit.
This is... amazing. Thanks for sharing. Annotation was excellent too. To me this say: Do not mess with nature.
Me: has a paddle in the pool
Everybody else at the nuclear reactor: 👁👄👁
Believe it or not, near the top of the pool, just under the surface, you would probably get less radiation than outside the pool. Water is an excellent material for blocking radiation, just under the surface it would block some of the natural background from things like cosmic rays (this is assuming the water itself is not contaminated of course). Yes, being near the reactor would be very bad, but the reactor is some distance away from the top of the pool, and water being an excellent radiation blocker and the inverse square law combine to make it pretty safe. Keep in mind, the spent fuel pool in this article is probably releasing more radiation than the reactor does. what-if.xkcd.com/29/
I known someone who went swimming in one he is a nuclear scientist I don’t really know what the fuck he do but I think it is important and he once went swimming to see if it does something. It don’t do anything apparently
@@fuka8315 I can see from your writing that you are black
Meme Machine WTF you can’t assume someone’s skin color just because of his writing (and for the information I’m white do you’re not even good at it)
@DevinDeath Yes, i'm racist
Beautiful video. I've seen the Cherenkov effect several times in person having worked in nuclear maintenance. It's always a sight to behold
Whats even more amazing is st elmos fire on wings of plames or masts of ships. That blue electric discharge glow is something 2 behold no matter its source
Unless it's in open air, then it's the reaper's flashlight
@@FleshWizard69420: I can't help but think this is a Louis Slotin reference. :(
Thank you very much for letting us see something so interesting and strange it was a great experience. How you expose the samples to the radiation, is threw the pipes that are shown behind the reactor or you have to put them on a side of it?
Very interesting and easy to comprehend, amazing!
Less toxic than most kid pools.
The kids wee in them. If this were a kids pool it would glow green/yellow and then there would be 5-eyed squids.
No really, water is amazing radiation insulator, no radiation reaches the surface of that pool. You could literally drink it. Ofc because it de-ionised, you would easily get nauseous, but its not serious.
Remove the kids and it will be toxic-free
@@jarskil8862 I would not recommend drinking the water from that pool. Neutron radiation tends to destabilize molecules around it, turning them radioactive. The reactor itself also releases Tritium, radioactive Helium, radioactive Xenon, etc., which can't be effectively caught by the cladding of the fuel rods and remains solute in the containment vessel water. Boiling water reactors are pretty safe, but not THAT safe.
Yep, in fact it's much less cancerogenic than chlorine infested water in the public pools.