Trying To Fly To America Before It Was Possible

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,2 тис.

  • @Vaquero4382
    @Vaquero4382 3 роки тому +2560

    Never laugh at these pioneers. They are the ones that dreamed, tried, failed, and then tried something else until something worked. They are the ones that pushed our knowledge forward.

    • @BungieStudios
      @BungieStudios 2 роки тому +23

      No. If man were meant to fly, we'd have wings. If we were meant to drive, we'd have wheels.

    • @realBobLazar
      @realBobLazar 2 роки тому +8

      @@JSSQuelloAutentico Where's the lie though? He's not wrong.

    • @ValeryFernandez_
      @ValeryFernandez_ 2 роки тому +1

      Omg no!!! Flying scares the heck out of me. 😭💀

    • @MrBrander
      @MrBrander 2 роки тому +110

      @@BungieStudios Yet. Here we are. Driving, flying and even sailing throughout the world. Hopefully one day traveling in some other way we haven't even dreamed up yet.

    • @BungieStudios
      @BungieStudios 2 роки тому +4

      @@MrBrander Nothing wrong with sailing because we know how to swim when born.

  • @DiamondCalibre
    @DiamondCalibre 4 роки тому +143

    It warms my heart knowing he died in 1957, meaning he saw not only his trans atlantic flight visions become reality, but also his jet engine visions. (He helped design one of the world's first jet aircraft.) I always hate it when visionaries and forward thinkers die just before their dreams become reality.

    • @anthonycurr3161
      @anthonycurr3161 Місяць тому

      Also he was a Stephen Fry lookalike Why no mention of airships?

  • @frankenwaifu8092
    @frankenwaifu8092 3 роки тому +834

    This baby was so majestic in Ghibli's The Wind Rises

  • @TRRailfan
    @TRRailfan 4 роки тому +5253

    Mustard doesn’t upload often, but when he does, it’s worth the wait.

  • @AubriGryphon
    @AubriGryphon 4 роки тому +475

    I never imagined calling an aircraft "dangerously stable" before, but there it is.

    • @worldcomicsreview354
      @worldcomicsreview354 4 роки тому +41

      That just makes it sound even more like a flying train. It's fine going down a straight track, but try to go round a sharp corner at high speed and you're in trouble!

    • @GeoSciful
      @GeoSciful 4 роки тому +32

      The more stable the less maneuverable. An aircraft has to have some instability so you can pilot it.

  • @thatpersonsmusic
    @thatpersonsmusic 2 роки тому +116

    When I saw this plane in The Wind Rises, I assumed it was being exaggerated, I admire Caproni’s ambitiousness

  • @pacificamindustriesltd.9024
    @pacificamindustriesltd.9024 4 роки тому +2782

    Textbook: "Assume drag is negligible"
    Caproni:

    • @series1054
      @series1054 4 роки тому +44

      Best one mate👌

    • @naga7647
      @naga7647 4 роки тому +6

      lol

    • @johnkere5004
      @johnkere5004 4 роки тому +76

      Flying materials: exist
      Caproni: I will take your entire stock

    • @ANYA.RIZALI
      @ANYA.RIZALI 4 роки тому +2

      mew

    • @JBofBrisbane
      @JBofBrisbane 4 роки тому +17

      Caproni: "Hold my Lambrusco..."

  • @phillydcinematics2543
    @phillydcinematics2543 4 роки тому +586

    Germany: A powerful and advanced aircraft is needed to cross the atlantic
    USA: Planes crossing the atlantic will need to be small and efficient
    Italy: *The more wings the better*

    • @CaptHollister
      @CaptHollister 4 роки тому +61

      UK: while you guys argue, we'll just go ahead and cross the Atlantic.

    • @Ledut-in-YT
      @Ledut-in-YT 4 роки тому +47

      Russia: Make it bigger, comrade!

    • @phillydcinematics2543
      @phillydcinematics2543 4 роки тому +3

      @@CaptHollister lol

    • @domhunt6488
      @domhunt6488 4 роки тому +31

      Italy is always extra with these sorts of things. More horsepower? - Bugatti, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Maserati, Pagani, Lancia

    • @fridaycaliforniaa236
      @fridaycaliforniaa236 4 роки тому +14

      @@domhunt6488 ...Ducati, Benelli... =)

  • @rodrigobraz2
    @rodrigobraz2 3 роки тому +364

    The sheer madness and ambition is oddly inspiring.

    • @iamsandhu8664
      @iamsandhu8664 3 роки тому +1

      yeahh

    • @NewDesignVinylGraphics
      @NewDesignVinylGraphics 3 роки тому +5

      Seems every prototype plane back in the 20s and 30s was way over engineered… by 1921 they had the foundation of what a regular plane is, why not just enlarge that ( essentially what a 747 is today )
      Instead they add extra pointless engines and a fuck ton of wings lmao

    • @realBobLazar
      @realBobLazar 2 роки тому

      Madness to waste money.

  • @caileanthomson1286
    @caileanthomson1286 4 роки тому +156

    Just when I think I have heard it all from the world of Aviation, here comes Mustard with a nine winged flying boat perhaps even more impractical than the Hughes H-4 Hercules.
    Thanks as always for posting these informative videos, Mustard, please keep them coming, they are always worth the wait.

    • @vishalbhat8602
      @vishalbhat8602 4 роки тому +1

      Yh Mustard doesn't upload often, but it's worth the wait for every video

    • @donmoore7785
      @donmoore7785 4 роки тому

      Definitely more impractical.

    • @someotherdude
      @someotherdude 4 роки тому +1

      PERHAPS more impractical??? The pilots are outside, on top, just behind the prop wash.

  • @francisdedumo3323
    @francisdedumo3323 4 роки тому +510

    "Airplanes are beautiful dreams, Engineers turned dreams into reality."
    - Caproni, from The Wind Rise Movie

    • @Luxonardo
      @Luxonardo 2 роки тому +9

      This quote is a very emotional one, especially if you're an aerospace engineer.

    • @Menaceblue3
      @Menaceblue3 Рік тому +4

      *"My name is Giovanni Caproni, but everyone calls me.... Caproni...."*

  • @strakhovandrri
    @strakhovandrri 4 роки тому +2941

    "But remember this, Japanese boy... airplanes are not tools for war. They are not for making money. Airplanes are beautiful dreams. Engineers turn dreams into reality."

    • @theothertroll
      @theothertroll 4 роки тому +27

      And engineers needlessly kill a lot of people along the way ~

    • @strakhovandrri
      @strakhovandrri 4 роки тому +174

      @@theothertroll they do it on purpose? No, they don't. Test pilots know, what do they do, and if something fails on serial vessel - it's a mistake, and not necessarily of an engineer.

    • @Deleted11100
      @Deleted11100 4 роки тому +158

      @@theothertroll read that back to yourself. Engineers needlessly kill people? Is your solution we jail all engineers? What am I reading about

    • @Tokito935
      @Tokito935 4 роки тому +52

      @@theothertroll sacrifices must be made, get over it

    • @fasterthandragons7908
      @fasterthandragons7908 4 роки тому +38

      @@theothertroll Yeah, hopefully you're one of those faithful souls.

  • @napalmninja45
    @napalmninja45 4 роки тому +976

    My boy Giovanni really thought people would be cool with sitting on a wooden bench all the way across the Atlantic.

    • @aierce
      @aierce 3 роки тому +99

      Don't we already do that, barely better

    • @namename1379
      @namename1379 3 роки тому +99

      @@aierce least we got some cushion

    • @cana0
      @cana0 3 роки тому +77

      That's what everyone did at the time. Except, on ships they did it with waves moving them, while here they were stable

    • @RapidFyrez
      @RapidFyrez 3 роки тому +40

      @@cana0 Haha no. Ships were big enough that people could, ya know, move around and relax and sit on chairs that had cushioning. This madman was expecting people to sit in a tight confined space on cushionless wooden benches for possibly *days*

    • @cana0
      @cana0 3 роки тому +20

      @@RapidFyrez only if you were rich enough to afford it. Poors sat on benches

  • @dodgelightyear
    @dodgelightyear 4 роки тому +88

    "Airplanes are beautiful, cursed dreams, waiting for the sky to swallow them up"
    What a coincidence, I've just watched The Wind Rises. I cried.

    • @lluisfargaslopez9603
      @lluisfargaslopez9603 4 роки тому +10

      This film is , as beautiful and devastating as life itself is.

    • @Akatsuki1289
      @Akatsuki1289 4 роки тому +9

      @@lluisfargaslopez9603 As an engineer, it has truly deeper meaning and emotion.

    • @Tinusa
      @Tinusa 4 роки тому

      The proper response

    • @kevinchappell3694
      @kevinchappell3694 4 роки тому

      Very good film......I reared a bit at the end as well.

  • @CaptainGrief66
    @CaptainGrief66 3 роки тому +172

    Another unrecognized achievement of the italians, Caproni was also one of the very first to make a rocket powered aircraft being beaten by just weeks if I'm not wrong
    Italian aviation (italy in general) is hugely under appreciated, they literally had the best aerodynamics experts of the era, it shows in how efficient their fighters were from an engineering standpoint

    • @madhukarjonathanminj2772
      @madhukarjonathanminj2772 2 роки тому +12

      yeah,the Italians were quite experimental

    • @harrison00xXx
      @harrison00xXx Рік тому

      And now look at them, totally fked up engineering, even their luxury sportswagon brands suck and are just a better Fiat

    • @Icetea-2000
      @Icetea-2000 Рік тому

      Can’t recall any planes in WW2 Italy to be as important as that of its contemporaries.

    • @CaptainGrief66
      @CaptainGrief66 Рік тому +10

      @@Icetea-2000
      No wonder you don't with that attitude, German pilots were quite fond of Italian aircrafts, the G.55 Centauro series that would serve under the Luftwaffe during the early days of the Armistice and the uprising in the south, the G.56 specifically was an incredibly capable platform that wildly outperformed the competition with the agility of a Spitfire yet the speeds and dive capabilities of a German or American fighter (some 700kp/h), officer Oberst Petersen wrote to Goering himself while overseeing tests of the Centauro going as far as saying that they should consider replacing some of their own planes with the G.55 (or ultimately the G.56, which had a German engine), but between allied sabotage, Germany being uncooperative as always and other shortages only 180 of the 800 planes ordered by the Germans were made and saw service
      Just to name one of the more obscure ones

    • @Icetea-2000
      @Icetea-2000 Рік тому +2

      @@CaptainGrief66 what attitude? I said I can’t think of any that were relevant. And they certainly weren’t particularly innovative like german, british and american aircraft

  • @riliryrimaddyvia9630
    @riliryrimaddyvia9630 4 роки тому +898

    2020
    What's a plane: it's a thing which can fly
    In the past
    What's a plane: it's just a train with wings.

    • @zutru
      @zutru 4 роки тому +38

      More like a ship with wings

    • @secondlieutenan
      @secondlieutenan 4 роки тому +4

      *train

    • @Aryan-ck9lv
      @Aryan-ck9lv 4 роки тому +10

      *beluga whale with wings

    • @AFoxGuy
      @AFoxGuy 4 роки тому +6

      *ShipTrain with wings

    • @kongus_bongus3906
      @kongus_bongus3906 4 роки тому +7

      PLANE TRAIN ua-cam.com/video/Cp9hAK7gf6k/v-deo.html

  • @skenzyme81
    @skenzyme81 4 роки тому +926

    More highly anticipated premiere than The Mandalorian. THIS IS THE PLANE

    • @Normal_Boii
      @Normal_Boii 4 роки тому +15

      This plane has a sad history, and the story itself is a better romantic story than twilight

    • @kishascape
      @kishascape 4 роки тому +6

      It’s like a flying floating Winnebago. I want to live in it. I will drop my poop from the skies! No more pump fees.

    • @9999AWC
      @9999AWC 4 роки тому +4

      Oi, Daft Punk, when are you gonna tour again? :P JK

    • @dmacpher
      @dmacpher 4 роки тому +6

      This is the plane

    • @billvoerster520
      @billvoerster520 4 роки тому +1

      @RomeoPapaCharlie
      I’m just

  • @outrundoubtrun-lemonadeart682
    @outrundoubtrun-lemonadeart682 3 роки тому +77

    Fun fact: The Transaereo was featured in the Studio Ghibil film "The Wind Rises," it was Caproni's dream to get it flying high up in the sky.

    • @алексеймухай
      @алексеймухай Рік тому +6

      Хаяо Миядзаки большой почитатель подобной техники)
      Все его произведения просто дышат мечтой о небе.

  • @christopherdemesa3474
    @christopherdemesa3474 4 роки тому +2181

    “Is the wind still rising, Japanese boy?”

  • @AerotaleYT
    @AerotaleYT 4 роки тому +1360

    Quality not Quantity is the Mustard mindtrack.

    • @wyaviation5183
      @wyaviation5183 4 роки тому +13

      Well said!

    • @Okiea
      @Okiea 4 роки тому +14

      Very great videos but not many of them

    • @Okiea
      @Okiea 4 роки тому +12

      Well said tho

    • @sacharjawellmer5530
      @sacharjawellmer5530 4 роки тому +11

      Definitely

    • @manjensen1710
      @manjensen1710 4 роки тому +12

      True, btw, anyone knows how to add subtitles? I wanted to translate them into Spanish like I did in another Mustard video but I can't find the option

  • @a2349
    @a2349 2 роки тому +204

    Actually Caproni's plane crashed into the water because the sandbags he used for ballast, to simulate the weight of the passengers on every seat, weren't tied down, so they may have slid to the back of the plane's passenger compartment during takeoff. Also, the pilot raised the nose too rapidly without reaching max takeoff speed.

    • @BoopSnoot
      @BoopSnoot Рік тому +26

      Also, it needed three more wings.

    • @polygondwanaland8390
      @polygondwanaland8390 Рік тому +14

      @@BoopSnoot And another 3km of wires

    • @norml.hugh-mann
      @norml.hugh-mann Рік тому

      It was a POS not capable of crossing the atlantic

    • @jesushchrist2261
      @jesushchrist2261 Рік тому +7

      ​@@norml.hugh-mannim sure you would have done better in 1920

    • @d.b.1858
      @d.b.1858 14 днів тому

      Oh Lookie Lookie ... another Satan Worshipping idiot that thinks he's so smart. But will never do anything of any actual value.

  • @AerotaleYT
    @AerotaleYT 4 роки тому +352

    How many wings you need?
    Caproni Transaero: Y e s

  • @falloutghoul1
    @falloutghoul1 4 роки тому +444

    When scaffolding flies.

  • @ironDsteele
    @ironDsteele 3 роки тому +354

    "Enormous ocean liners were crossing the ocean." *Not all of them*

  • @XMarkxyz
    @XMarkxyz 4 роки тому +138

    Caproni made more noteworthy incredible planes: the Caproni Ca. 161 set the incredible altitude record of 17083 m (56046 feet), broken by another propeller aircraft only in 1995; the Campini-Caproni was the second reaction engine plane to fly and for much time the only one known of since Germany kept his project secret

    • @neutronalchemist3241
      @neutronalchemist3241 4 роки тому +9

      And the first one to fly for a long distance (MIlan-Rome).

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 4 роки тому +2

      Yes but in truth it was an overweight airplane with an underpowered engine that tended to overheat, so much that the pilot and copilot were forced to fly with the canopies slide back. If it had been installed a more powerful engine with heat resistant alloys it would have been viable for more research and perhaps a more "jet like engine" but also Italy suffered acute shortage of heat resistant alloys. I've seen this airplane at the excellent air museum outside Rome and you can see that it was extremely well built but does leave quite perplexed why it was built so heavy....

  • @37A-s6h
    @37A-s6h 4 роки тому +266

    Caproni: Commence 2nd test flight
    Transaero's wings:
    *"No, I don't think I will"*

  • @AEKarnes
    @AEKarnes 4 роки тому +13

    Mustard, you should have a look at the aerodynamics of this aircraft. Models of it in every size from small to grand scale featuring both partial engine mountings as well as all eight engines, usually electric motors, have flown successfully and have proven to be very controllable and flight stable. I have done a lot of reading about what caused the Ca.60 to crash and it seems it was more of a pilot-error accident than an aerodynamic or structural shortcoming. I love your videos!

  • @37A-s6h
    @37A-s6h 4 роки тому +231

    Woman:
    "My child is a beautiful angel!"
    Her beautiful angel: 6:41

  • @Dwarltier
    @Dwarltier 4 роки тому +279

    ">250m of struts"
    Jeb Kerman liked that

    • @blackstone1a
      @blackstone1a 4 роки тому +6

      The Kraken will enjoy this meal

    • @charlie7mason
      @charlie7mason 4 роки тому

      @@blackstone1a 2nd flight, the Kraken call the Transaero to it for sure.

    • @frostymittens7913
      @frostymittens7913 4 роки тому

      Flying materials: exist
      Caproni: I will take your entire stock

  • @buihelgason
    @buihelgason 2 роки тому +28

    One of my favorite parts of Hayao Miyazaki's The Wind Rises, was the plane scenes. I wasn't a huge fan of the film, but when this thing I showed up, i was awestruck. Such a pretty film.
    And such a pretty plane. I wonder how the world would look had the Transaero been successful.

  • @TheLonelyBrit
    @TheLonelyBrit 4 роки тому +307

    3:58 Ah yes, the Kerbal way of keeping your craft together... *MORE STRUTS!*

  • @westcheap
    @westcheap 4 роки тому +424

    "with two pilots up front in an open-air cockpit"
    sorry what

    • @worldcomicsreview354
      @worldcomicsreview354 4 роки тому +75

      It was standard for the time. There was a large interwar British bomber which was a fast, two-engined monoplane much like the ones in WW2... only without a roof.

    • @lanzortiz3199
      @lanzortiz3199 4 роки тому +45

      Same reaction when i heard it. 😂 the regular speed of airplane today comes to our mind. Lmao but if you listen carefully it only travel 80 kph, so that is like just riding a motorcycle. I think even during ww1 fighter pilot has an open cockpit and they only use goggles and a windshield.

    • @weldonwin
      @weldonwin 4 роки тому +14

      Being air crew on this thing would suck hard, though, imagine being a passenger on this thing, with only wooden benches to sit on and some of them are facing backwards

    • @klausstock8020
      @klausstock8020 4 роки тому +49

      The pilots would double as air speed indicators. And temperature indicators. And general weather indicators.

    • @billbusen
      @billbusen 4 роки тому +16

      That was my favorite part. 100 passengers, crew of eight, open-air cockpit...

  • @rosevan5485
    @rosevan5485 3 роки тому +2

    I’m a 52 yrs old musician / artist and now businessman. Your videos are worth a copy of Scientific America…. Or a section in a topic in National Geographic .
    Really. Your work is Oscar/ Very Short Documentary work…. Your attention to detail is exceptional… like your maps you lay out on a table with the creases….. amazing.
    I’m an air plane / history interested person. Just an amazing series of works you have done.
    Thank you. Waiting for your short documentary or your full feature documentary. Push on.
    Cheers from Quebec, Canada.

  • @akshayvenugopalan2940
    @akshayvenugopalan2940 4 роки тому +291

    Red baron: Ha! I have 3 wings
    Caproni Transaereo: That's cute.

    • @chrisamies2141
      @chrisamies2141 4 роки тому +9

      After the success of the triplane Fokker did actually build a five-winger with a 3 + 2 configuration. It was as successful as you might imagine (i.e. not), and afterwards its designer refused to talk about it.

    • @worldcomicsreview354
      @worldcomicsreview354 4 роки тому +6

      @@chrisamies2141 The British had a triplane too, which I think did fairly well, but more wings ultimately means less speed.

    • @paulallen8109
      @paulallen8109 4 роки тому +2

      @@worldcomicsreview354 Actually the British triplane (Sopwith Triplane) came *before* the famous Fokker Dr.1 the Red Baron used. The Fokker Dr.1 got an elevated reputation mostly due to the famous baron but in reality few of them were made and pilots found them underpowered and slow. By early 1918 many of them had been phased out for the formidable Fokker DVII biplane - which was specifically mentioned in the terms of the armistice to be handed over to the victorious allies.

    • @die1mayer
      @die1mayer 4 роки тому +2

      @@paulallen8109 Richthofen about the triplane: "nimble like the devil, climbing like an ape". The Fokker Dr.1 was an excellent dogfighter but had a problem with structural integrity (high wing load of the upper wing).

    • @Fo4assaultriflefan92
      @Fo4assaultriflefan92 4 роки тому

      For the majority of the war richtofen operated a bi-plane

  • @SJ-gv1yj
    @SJ-gv1yj 4 роки тому +128

    2:19 😯 Caproni from The Wind Rises the Studio Ghibli film 🎥.

    • @AaronShenghao
      @AaronShenghao 4 роки тому +20

      Emm... He was real very real. On the other hand Ghibli does have a thing with Italian planes.

    • @JohnDoe-wl2ou
      @JohnDoe-wl2ou 4 роки тому +16

      @@AaronShenghao Porco Rosso for example

    • @GoodnightFromHim
      @GoodnightFromHim 4 роки тому +1

      Yes

    • @carta8399
      @carta8399 4 роки тому +11

      @@AaronShenghao Yes the Ghibli itself was an italian plane

    • @Dustz92
      @Dustz92 4 роки тому +12

      This plane is in the film too, as well as it crashing. Did you watch it?

  • @MeBallerman
    @MeBallerman 3 роки тому +15

    This plane is incredibly beautiful. Seems nobody in the comment section can see just how fantastic it looked, only making jokes about it. I think it candidates as one of the most beautiful things ever created by man, so majestic.

    • @iamsandhu8664
      @iamsandhu8664 3 роки тому +2

      That idea, that idea changed the world

    • @1985cjjeeper
      @1985cjjeeper 3 роки тому

      Dr. Methesto from Southpark has a 9 assed monkey you might be interested in.

  • @MyLateralThawts
    @MyLateralThawts 4 роки тому +649

    Caproni: “I thought it would work!” Dornier: “Halte mein Bier!”

    • @dwayne5178
      @dwayne5178 4 роки тому +28

      does it mean hold my beer

    • @MyLateralThawts
      @MyLateralThawts 4 роки тому +31

      @@dwayne5178 Ja

    • @azrail_winters
      @azrail_winters 4 роки тому +8

      Don,t you think he shuld do a vid on the ho 229 if you don,t know what it is serch it up

    • @MyLateralThawts
      @MyLateralThawts 4 роки тому +6

      @@azrail_winters There already are quite a few videos on the Ho 229, I would recommend the following from Dr Mark Felton: ua-cam.com/video/QD3JWVSkDuU/v-deo.html

    • @noav7
      @noav7 4 роки тому +1

      @@azrail_winters I know exactly what that is and I find it awesome you also know

  • @morpheas768
    @morpheas768 4 роки тому +6

    0:40 One look at this majestic contraption, and I can instantly feel why its creators wanted to build it and make it work.
    The sheer awe and inspiration it must have took, not to mention doing what had not been done before...I love it!

  • @mikosmausos
    @mikosmausos 3 роки тому +75

    "Hm...if i want to make plane, i look at bird. Bird has two wings. If i want to make bigger plane, i look at bigger bird. Big bird has tw....lets make 9 wings guys, sounds good!!"

    • @cristig243
      @cristig243 3 роки тому +13

      If i want to make bigger plane, I tie more birds together. It will fly like a 4 legged chicken.

    • @Elrog3
      @Elrog3 3 роки тому +1

      You can't get more clearer of an example of progress made by _not_ imitating nature than an aerofoil. If you didn't do what a small bird did to fly in the first place, why would you look at a big bird later?

  • @USSAnimeNCC-
    @USSAnimeNCC- 4 роки тому +111

    Imagine if Caproni was able to see the Airbus A380

    • @shinkreytpuylap
      @shinkreytpuylap 4 роки тому +6

      He would be like
      *No no*

    • @AJ-zt4bb
      @AJ-zt4bb 4 роки тому +21

      He would be proud

    • @robertwest6350
      @robertwest6350 4 роки тому +8

      @Tom Sanders mamá mía! Howa willa ita eva getta Offa da grounda!!

    • @CaptHollister
      @CaptHollister 4 роки тому +29

      He died in 1957, so while he never saw modern large capacity passenger jets, he had time to see the era of transatlantic jet-powered passenger jets. His company survived until the 1980s.

    • @cristig243
      @cristig243 3 роки тому +4

      Low cost design. 7 wings missing.

  • @GRAHAMAUS
    @GRAHAMAUS 4 роки тому +324

    Caproni: a man whose dictionary had no entry for "drag".

    • @npc6817
      @npc6817 4 роки тому +57

      All he cared about dragging were his gigantic balls

    • @ketas
      @ketas 4 роки тому +5

      would it make it real drag queen?

    • @alessandromazzini7026
      @alessandromazzini7026 4 роки тому +1

      By that day, It wasn't such a problem, with low Power engines they needed lots of lift (so of course It had Lots of drag)

    • @gian.4388
      @gian.4388 4 роки тому +1

      @@npc6817 Considering he also built the biggest biplane ever, that would make sense

  • @petergraves2085
    @petergraves2085 4 роки тому +4

    This is one of the most informative technical presentations I've seen and heard. I'd seen photos of Caproni's plane, but never understood how it was supposed to fly and the limitations on not being able to do this. Bravo.

  • @thatswhy9504
    @thatswhy9504 4 роки тому +21

    Caproni is my favorite aircraft designer I just love his design ideas even if they didn’t work they all have a special passion and spirit behind it, Caproni truly had a true passion for aviation.

  • @GingerSpy2
    @GingerSpy2 4 роки тому +60

    When this giant appeared in Studio Ghibli movie The wind Rises I first thought it was another fantasy machine created by Hayao Miyazaki.

  • @solidcoal8131
    @solidcoal8131 3 роки тому +124

    engineer: why doesn't it fly I adding 9 wings to it
    it should fly

    • @jamespong6588
      @jamespong6588 3 роки тому +6

      Maybe if I add a few more...

    • @DerSchnensch
      @DerSchnensch 3 роки тому +8

      "It worked in KSP"

    • @Khronogi
      @Khronogi 3 роки тому +1

      @@DerSchnensch exactly what I thought. Just add more rockets

  • @cowsine
    @cowsine 4 роки тому +70

    It didn't fail, at least it made it into a mustard video!

    • @feivelwilliamaudiestevianto
      @feivelwilliamaudiestevianto 4 роки тому +6

      Any Transportation vehicle that got into Mustard's Video is a Success
      Success on getting into Mustard's video
      Failure on the real world

    • @AerotaleYT
      @AerotaleYT 4 роки тому +4

      @@feivelwilliamaudiestevianto I am still waiting for success stories.

    • @feivelwilliamaudiestevianto
      @feivelwilliamaudiestevianto 4 роки тому +3

      @@AerotaleYT yeah same

    • @feivelwilliamaudiestevianto
      @feivelwilliamaudiestevianto 4 роки тому +3

      @@AerotaleYT wait... But the De Havilland Comet was a success because it was the first jetliner

    • @AerotaleYT
      @AerotaleYT 4 роки тому +2

      @@feivelwilliamaudiestevianto But it was a commercial failure. It didn't sell many planes. The only success story was that of the Airbus A300

  • @Chillgamer.
    @Chillgamer. 4 роки тому +338

    "I'm limited by the technology of my time"

    • @Kav.
      @Kav. 4 роки тому +31

      More he was limited by poor understanding of well... physics?
      If he had built the wings in line with the fuselage it would have made a great deal more sense and well, who wouldn't spot the obvious issues with wings stacked behind each other?
      Limited by the knowledge of the time is perhaps a better explanation.

    • @no3ironman11100
      @no3ironman11100 3 роки тому +7

      @@Kav. You said the same thing but okay

    • @Kav.
      @Kav. 3 роки тому +13

      @@no3ironman11100 no, scientific understanding and developed technology are two different things.

    • @rltt379
      @rltt379 3 роки тому +3

      @@Kav. better understanding→better technology, so there is a difference yes, but not enough to bring it up

    • @rltt379
      @rltt379 3 роки тому +1

      @sebas Stein they didn't know how to make what they need

  • @toast6494
    @toast6494 3 роки тому +157

    "Sir, it doesn't fly! What do we do?"
    "Add more wings"
    "But sir, our science department says-"
    *"Did I stutter?"*

    • @twistedyogert
      @twistedyogert 3 роки тому +6

      "Well, he writes our paychecks sooo."

    • @timhaley3459
      @timhaley3459 3 роки тому +1

      Many are amazed at what engineers have devised in the world of flight, but how many have looked at the greatest fliers of all time - birds ? For example, the hummingbird. In terms of body lengths per second, a diving hummingbird flies faster than a fighter jet, said a researcher from the University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A. some 15 years ago.
      Christopher Clark filmed the courtship rituals of male Anna’s hummingbirds and calculated that when swooping to impress females, “the feathered acrobats reached speeds of almost 400 body lengths per second.” He said that such a speed is comparatively “greater than [that] of a fighter jet” at full throttle. When pulling up at the end of its dive, the bird is subject to a force ten times the pull of gravity-more than fighter pilots can stand without losing consciousness.
      All birds have just two wings and are able to perform really miraculous flight, some ' turning on a dime ', weave in and out through a maze of branches in a forest and then land quietly on a tree limb, while there is the long distance fliers, such as the Arctic Tern, who has been known to travel some 56,000 miles in one year, going from the Arctic to the Antarctic and back without getting lost.
      Then there is the "speedsters", the hummingbird, that beats its wings anywhere from 50 to 80 times a second (depending upon the hummingbird bird, for the giant hummingbird beats its wings only 10 to 15 times a second, having a wingspan of about 8.5 inches while its body length is about 9.1 inches, weighing about 3/4 of an ounce, and having a heartbeat of about 300 times a minute while resting but can reach over 1,000 when at peak performance)
      The Bee hummingbird (which is found only in Cuba) beats it wings up to 80 times a second (but during a courtship flight, they can beat up to 200 times per second), measures only about 2 1/4 inches long and often mistaken for bees, weighing in less than a US dime, with the female building a nest barely an inch across, with her eggs being about the size of a coffee bean.
      The Ruby-throated hummingbird uses only 1/30 of an ounce of fatty fuel to cross the Gulf Mexico to South America around September of each year for the winter, a distance of anywhere from 600 to 800 miles, and then returns to following spring to its "summer home" without getting lost.
      No heavy load of fuel, no training in navigation, no complicated charts or computers ! Yet, it finds it way perfectly there and back. Just an accident ? Or the superb design of a Creator ?

    • @westnblu
      @westnblu 3 роки тому

      Yes its weird that way. I think much of an animals instinct or 'apprenticeship' is built into its DNA. With humans we need a manual to set up a beach umbrella ! haha

    • @timhaley3459
      @timhaley3459 3 роки тому

      @@westnblu
      As you pointed out, animals, birds, fish, microorganisms all are lead by instinct, a pre-programmed arrangement built into their DNA that causes them to accomplish what God designed them for, such as the ant that is "instinctively wise".(Prov 30:24, 25; New World Translation) However, we as humans are not pre-programmed, but were created as free moral agents.
      We can choose as to what we will do do with our lives, being created "in the image of God" (Gen 1:26), able to discern right from wrong, able to make "judgment calls", able to show genuine love, able to look at the past, recognize the present and long for a secure future, as King David of ancient Israel wrote: "In you, O Jehovah, I have taken refuge. May I never be put to shame. Rescue me because of your righteousness........How abundant your goodness is ! You have stored it up for those who fear you, and you have shown it before all men, in behalf of those taking refuge in you."(Note: Jehovah is God's personal name, Isa 12:2, KJV)
      The "goodness" that Jehovah has stored up for "meek" ones is perfect peace, perfect health and perfect security on a paradise earth forever.(Ps 37:11, 29; Matt 5:5) Sickness and death, that is the result of sin or imperfection, will be completely eradicated and replaced with a "banquet" that never ends.(Isa 25:6-8)
      The animals, birds, fish and all other creatures will delight these "meek" ones in their display of ' instinctive wisdom ', such as watching a weaver bird weave a beautiful nest with only its beak, or a beaver building a dam, knowing exactly what to do, where to place the mud, grasses and pieces of wood to stop the flow of water, or a leaf-cutting ant "understanding" how to be a farmer of fungi.
      But unless a person becomes a "meek" one, a person who allows themselves to be "taught by Jehovah" (Isa 54:13; John 6:45), they will not experience the thrill of living on the paradise earth, that will never become boring.

    • @smearfo5612
      @smearfo5612 3 роки тому

      @@timhaley3459 The hummingbird ended up how it is today, instincts and all, because those that weren't good at those things died, and the ones that were really good at it produced lots of offspring. Given enough time, any lineage would change to suit its environment, as those best suited in the current generation would reproduce the most.

  • @DanVR001
    @DanVR001 4 роки тому +32

    Check out the animated movie called "The Wind Rises" by Studio Ghibli, it has a few references to this airplane.

  • @arroyotyronejonep.5789
    @arroyotyronejonep.5789 4 роки тому +135

    Any ghibli fans know this plane from "The Wind Rises"

    • @37A-s6h
      @37A-s6h 4 роки тому +33

      **Insert Caproni destroying the camera in anger as the plane crashes**

    • @paradox...
      @paradox... 4 роки тому +13

      One of their most underrated films!

    • @ArnoldTriyudho
      @ArnoldTriyudho 4 роки тому

      Hell yeah..

    • @JadeMythriil
      @JadeMythriil 4 роки тому +5

      when I saw it, I thought it was too outlandish to be real and must've been designed for the movie. Turns out the plane was very real.

    • @KuroHebi
      @KuroHebi 4 роки тому +1

      @@JadeMythriil I was thinking the same thing. I can't believe this hydroplane actually existed.

  • @LeoMkII
    @LeoMkII 3 роки тому +27

    this thing is so ghibli, now I know from where miyazaki got it's inspiration

    • @wolfgangervin2582
      @wolfgangervin2582 3 роки тому +1

      The failed Transaero flight is shown in The Wind Rises iirc.

  • @han1218
    @han1218 4 роки тому +158

    This guy was ahead of his time, and probably thought his work was a failure, but people after him picked up where he left off and made successful designs.

    • @hlmc00
      @hlmc00 4 роки тому +14

      we own many of our technological advancement to futurist

    • @han1218
      @han1218 4 роки тому +25

      ​@@hlmc00 Yep, but it's a little sad when such visionaries don't see the fruits of their labor, and are also misunderstood by others.

    • @VFAHSN
      @VFAHSN 4 роки тому +9

      @@han1218 others like half of the comment section? It's suddenly full of aerospace engineers.

    • @0Turbox
      @0Turbox 3 роки тому +6

      Mah Internetz, someone builds the most ridiculous vehicle and there will always be someone: "Look, these pioneers".

    • @MrDino1953
      @MrDino1953 3 роки тому +6

      ..”picked up where he left off”...only in the sense that they had to ignore everything he did and employ scientific principles in their designs.

  • @deleopoldis448
    @deleopoldis448 4 роки тому +8

    I worked as a tourist guide at Caproni's house in Italy. Truly one of the most fascinating man of the century and one of the most ambitious entrepreneurs who ever lived. He would've been ecstatic to know how far technology has come since his times. As Bernard of Chartres said, we are dwarfes standing on the shoulders of giant.

  • @marcleslac2413
    @marcleslac2413 2 роки тому +18

    Imagine if caproni saw the a380. Hed be stunned.

  • @AerotaleYT
    @AerotaleYT 4 роки тому +144

    Who could dislike a
    G O D V I D E O?

    • @thijsvanderlinden2209
      @thijsvanderlinden2209 4 роки тому +12

      The devil himself

    • @MangoMouse1604
      @MangoMouse1604 4 роки тому +13

      Indeed better than good, so it’s
      *G O D*

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 4 роки тому +8

      Atheists like me?

    • @gormauslander
      @gormauslander 4 роки тому +9

      @@AtheistOrphan may I interest you in the religion of mustard?

    • @AerotaleYT
      @AerotaleYT 4 роки тому +7

      @@AtheistOrphan no I meant the level of standard in this video is beyond perfection

  • @VexifyGaming
    @VexifyGaming 4 роки тому +69

    Skipping school for this because I actually learn from mustard

    • @bluemountain4181
      @bluemountain4181 4 роки тому +1

      Can't catch Covid if you stay at home watching Mustard *taps head*

    • @BATMANal
      @BATMANal 4 роки тому +1

      This man speak facts

    • @GEU1164
      @GEU1164 4 роки тому

      Same

    • @gmh50o26
      @gmh50o26 4 роки тому

      Fax

    • @yahoolix2
      @yahoolix2 4 роки тому

      Agree 90%

  • @reallifevillains1261
    @reallifevillains1261 3 роки тому +36

    This plane always fascinated me. I'd love to see it rebuilt as hopeless as that is.

  • @WonderWorldYTC
    @WonderWorldYTC 4 роки тому +359

    Looks safe to me, what could do wrong.

    • @bmw3-er
      @bmw3-er 4 роки тому +19

      "Pull Up, Pull Up"

    • @Fred_the_1996
      @Fred_the_1996 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah, the airframe looks veeeeery sturdy

    • @vichyfrance1008
      @vichyfrance1008 3 роки тому +2

      when im in the plane: wow this cool
      later...
      pilot: hey we are losing altitude we need to lose some weight
      me: *blames guy with big lougage*

    • @karotgamin790
      @karotgamin790 3 роки тому

      thas a lotta struts

    • @128Cores
      @128Cores 3 роки тому +2

      @@bmw3-er Terrain, Terrain, Pull up, Pull up

  • @urano1988
    @urano1988 4 роки тому +50

    Giovanni reads as Jovanni. Geeovanni really hurts Italians' hears.

    • @GiulioImparato
      @GiulioImparato 4 роки тому +5

      sounds like when people say "Ciao" as cheeeaow.

    • @riot2136
      @riot2136 4 роки тому +8

      @@Robocopnik bro chill haha

    • @arya31ful
      @arya31ful 4 роки тому +2

      Don't worry, i'll put pineapple in my pizza and ketchup in my pasta to cheer you up.

    • @HMN134
      @HMN134 4 роки тому

      @@Robocopnik that's racist

    • @Jon-nx5ut
      @Jon-nx5ut 4 роки тому

      @@arya31ful dude

  • @Jhowy-wu3mr
    @Jhowy-wu3mr 4 роки тому +100

    “Airplanes are beautiful cursed dreams... waiting for the sky to swallow them up.”

    • @whackle7378
      @whackle7378 3 роки тому +5

      Nice to see another fan of the Wind rises

    • @jishan6992
      @jishan6992 3 роки тому +5

      @@whackle7378 was this actually the Italian guy In the wind rises?

    • @whackle7378
      @whackle7378 3 роки тому +5

      @@jishan6992 yep. The plane that falls apart while taking off is this one

    • @Nahoko_Satomi
      @Nahoko_Satomi 3 роки тому

      @@whackle7378 it was broken down too!

    • @amudeas
      @amudeas 3 роки тому +1

      The wind rises, is one of the best movies i have seen

  • @jaeyeon6012
    @jaeyeon6012 4 роки тому +74

    nobody:
    literally nobody:
    mustard: the x was unlike any aircraft ever built

    • @gram.
      @gram. 4 роки тому +1

      ha, yeah, hilarious

  • @knife-wieldingspidergod5059
    @knife-wieldingspidergod5059 4 роки тому +41

    Caproni has seen the future of airline industry, bench for seats.

  • @Anon26535
    @Anon26535 3 роки тому +3

    1:58 A good landing is one you can walk away from. A great landing is one where they can use the plane again afterwards.

  • @stevemc01
    @stevemc01 4 роки тому +160

    Me: Mom can we get airplane?
    Mom: We already have airplane at home.
    AIrplane at home: 6:40

  • @juicebox9465
    @juicebox9465 4 роки тому +38

    "250 meters of struts"
    Looks like we found the ksp player.

  • @JeiHS
    @JeiHS 2 роки тому +7

    i like how the first 40 meters flight and the massive 400000km from Earth to Moon flight only spaced about 66 years. If we are that fast to develope something small to super-sized, i gotta doubt that space ship, will not be that far.

  • @kaltenstein7718
    @kaltenstein7718 4 роки тому +21

    I saw this thing in Ghibli's "The Wind Rises" and i thought it was a fictional craft... Same goes for the person of Caproni

  • @michaelsoper5765
    @michaelsoper5765 4 роки тому +35

    Yo man, how many wings did you want in this thing again?
    *Yes*

  • @PacoOtis
    @PacoOtis 2 роки тому +1

    These dreamers are the shoulders we stand on today! Bravo to those folks!

  • @beanbag7096
    @beanbag7096 4 роки тому +37

    I just watched The Wind Rises and I am so glad to see this video!
    (Its a great movie by Studio Ghibli I highly reccomend it)

    • @robertlooper135
      @robertlooper135 4 роки тому +5

      That's my favorite movie! The inclusion of this plane is great lol

    • @GoodnightFromHim
      @GoodnightFromHim 4 роки тому +2

      My personal favourite among the studio ghibli collection to im a plane nerd

    • @ArthurSeijiNishikawa
      @ArthurSeijiNishikawa 4 роки тому +2

      And Ghibli is named so after one of Caproni's planes!

    • @konstantinriumin2657
      @konstantinriumin2657 4 роки тому

      @@ArthurSeijiNishikawa Yes, the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caproni_Ca.309

  • @rodrigonogueiramota4433
    @rodrigonogueiramota4433 4 роки тому +53

    "There´s no way a plane can be built with 9 wings"
    somebody in Russia: looks like a challenge to me

    • @Ozymandias1
      @Ozymandias1 4 роки тому +3

      Trust me, I'm an engineer

    • @worldcomicsreview354
      @worldcomicsreview354 4 роки тому +9

      The early Soviet Union actually had a design for a ridiculously huge bomber with something like 12 engines and naval cannons.

    • @jimtaylor294
      @jimtaylor294 4 роки тому +1

      The vast number of engines was due to post-civil war Russia having nothing more powerful.
      Only in the post-WWII era, was this defiency finally resolved.

    • @worldcomicsreview354
      @worldcomicsreview354 4 роки тому

      @Writter Gamer Engineers: OK, we need seven large jet engines...
      Suppliers: Ah, you are building some airliners? Perhaps also a tri-jet heavy cargo plane?
      Engineers: No, just a boat.

  • @Phobero
    @Phobero 2 роки тому +2

    That's very cool - I'm Italian and I didn't know that. Thank you for upolading this video.

  • @TheOgamerchannel
    @TheOgamerchannel 4 роки тому +8

    First saw this plane portrayed in the beautiful animation movie "The wind rises" (recommend watching for anyone interested in aviation) , was surprised to see it actually existed at one point.

  • @theenzoferrari458
    @theenzoferrari458 4 роки тому +4

    This channel is a perfect example of quality over quantity. I've now started to add mustard to my hamburgers and even hotdogs thanks to this awesome guy.

  • @robcizzle
    @robcizzle 3 роки тому +6

    “Take whatever works and do a lot more of it” 😂😂 That’s my new philosophy😂😁

  • @minkshaming
    @minkshaming 4 роки тому +6

    I rememember doing a school presentation on this plane when i was 10 and thinking "This is crazy, such a shame it'll be lost to time" but it seems people haven't forgotten it!

  • @ThatRedSW20
    @ThatRedSW20 4 роки тому +75

    is this a plane in "The wind rise"?

  • @veggieboyultimate
    @veggieboyultimate 3 роки тому +1

    I have never heard of this type of planes until I watched this video. Now I know it wasn’t the only one.

  • @purp82
    @purp82 4 роки тому +81

    I’ve never clicked so fast

  • @sentinelcheese3420
    @sentinelcheese3420 4 роки тому +69

    Wings: *exist*
    Caproni: "It's free real estate!"

    • @svennoren9047
      @svennoren9047 4 роки тому

      The combined wing area of that thing would make for a decent size garden...

  • @flyingdutchman9961
    @flyingdutchman9961 3 роки тому +6

    6:39 That tiny plane isn't ugly but cute. It looks like a baby plane :3

  • @rapha2028
    @rapha2028 4 роки тому +5

    How to wait for mustard uploads:
    1. forget about mustard
    2. find the videos in your homepage

  • @joejia1410
    @joejia1410 4 роки тому +34

    You need to click fast for the premium mustard experience

  • @rannochanno3268
    @rannochanno3268 3 роки тому +4

    I saw this aircraft in 'The Wind Rises' and even though I haven't seen it irl or even a model like or had heard about it until that film. And even with modern air travel and the possibility of what may come in the future. Seeing it did fill me with a sense of awe and wonderment of aircraft.
    This is why I love engineering. Even though I'm studying Video Games and animation production.

  • @FedericoLucchi
    @FedericoLucchi 4 роки тому +5

    6:41 that must be the CUTEST aircraft ever built!

  • @Cby0530
    @Cby0530 4 роки тому +9

    Saw this the first time in Miyazaki's The Wind Rises.
    It's as grand as depicted.

  • @coreyandnathanielchartier3749
    @coreyandnathanielchartier3749 2 роки тому +3

    Look at it this way-At least Caproni's plane flew better than Langley's Aerodrome. That this thing was able to break the water tension and rise into the air is amazing. It's literally a flying houseboat!

    • @doankhang9496
      @doankhang9496 2 роки тому

      Imagine Langley's Aerodrome took off from Caproni's plane

  • @KingSlimjeezy
    @KingSlimjeezy 4 роки тому +9

    Stipa Caproni: I'm so ugly
    McDonnell X-45 Goblin: Hold my mirror

  • @georges-anthonymoubayed7983
    @georges-anthonymoubayed7983 4 роки тому +32

    Caproni Transaero: the 20th century’s A380
    “The right aircraft at the wrong moment”

    • @theacme3
      @theacme3 3 роки тому

      "The right aircraft at the wrong moment" - What moment would have been "right" for the Caproni? i don't think there every was or ever will be one. So, No.

  • @KillzoneParadox
    @KillzoneParadox 4 роки тому +7

    "The wind is rising! We must try to live."
    Glad Miyazaki made that masterpiece.

  • @FinancialShinanigan
    @FinancialShinanigan 4 роки тому +13

    Engineers: How many wings do you want?
    Caproni: YES

  • @JeffTheBunnySlayer
    @JeffTheBunnySlayer 4 роки тому +67

    It looks like he stole the blinds out of my grandmother’s living room and taped them on top of a yacht

  • @TheJadeFist
    @TheJadeFist 3 роки тому +8

    -"So how many wings do we want to build on this thing?"
    -"Yes"

  • @warhead_beast7661
    @warhead_beast7661 4 роки тому +12

    This plane also was in one of Miyazakis materpieces in "As the Wind rises" I rlly can recomend this Film

  • @thaniel7313
    @thaniel7313 4 роки тому +21

    "Le vent se lève, il faut tenter de vivre!"

  • @alphamale1717
    @alphamale1717 3 роки тому +1

    1:23 to my understanding they are now around 24 hours for an Atlantic crossing now.

  • @Aleblanco1987
    @Aleblanco1987 4 роки тому +4

    I learnt about caproni in 'the wind rises', he was really ahead of his time

  • @hotroddinggarage
    @hotroddinggarage 4 роки тому +5

    I've been at the Caproni Museum in Trento two months ago, and you can find a quite good scale model of this plane, along with many others interesting things.

  • @GamalKevin
    @GamalKevin 4 роки тому

    It's really mesmerizing to see that this channel actually make 3d renders and videos of the planes, not just still images slideshow. The quality is uncanny.

  • @snorefest1621
    @snorefest1621 4 роки тому +6

    Remember seeing this in The Wind Rises. One of my favorite movies.