I'd rather feed algae pools with the CO2 and reap the benefits of the hydrogen and biomass production. This would be gainfully processing the CO2, not storing it at great expense or potential escape from its confines eventually. Serious advances have been made in capabilities to utilize hydrogen in a "paste like" form, eliminating storage embrittlement problems, high pressures for volumetric issues and in turn transportation intricacies that are costly and problematic, so exchanging the lignification of CO2 for "paste" production of hydrogen seems a much more advantageous alternative IMHO. Edit: Leasing the properties under eminent domain and utilizing these properties for algae ponds "hydrogen farming" "biomass fuel production" "bioreactors" sounds far more win-win, again, IMHO.
Eminent domain in any instance is wrong. There was no reason to use the land prior, the government (or private in this case?) makes something to “require” eminent domain to be necessary? Nope. Sorry you didn’t think ahead and it takes more time/money, but there’s alternatives to every solution. You want to run a pipeline, pay for the right negotiated w the land owner. You wouldn’t think of using eminent domain on Russia, China, etc so stop treating citizens like they’re just temporary rental property that you collect taxes/payments from. Oh, that was a rant. 😊
🤔Thinking about Moving to Iowa? Let us help! ✅
📱Call or Text 319.480.3875
📧 Tony@luekenre.com
This should be stopped. CO2 is what plants need to live.
Yes it does and cannot be said enough.
Thanks! I had emailed you about this
@@blancaperezAZ Yw! You have a lot to do with why I did this video. Hopefully it was up to par as I was short on time this week💯
Yeah how does a private company get to use eminent domain to take land from people
@@Kevin-on1ez it’s nuts
Because corrupt politicians let them.
Iowa they're making sport of you with this one! Trust me this is a boondoggle.
Iowa legislature and senate typically vote against property rights in exchange for campaign contributions.
This is the most extreme example of government waste I've ever seen!
I'd rather feed algae pools with the CO2 and reap the benefits of the hydrogen and biomass production. This would be gainfully processing the CO2, not storing it at great expense or potential escape from its confines eventually.
Serious advances have been made in capabilities to utilize hydrogen in a "paste like" form, eliminating storage embrittlement problems, high pressures for volumetric issues and in turn transportation intricacies that are costly and problematic, so exchanging the lignification of CO2 for "paste" production of hydrogen seems a much more advantageous alternative IMHO.
Edit: Leasing the properties under eminent domain and utilizing these properties for algae ponds "hydrogen farming" "biomass fuel production" "bioreactors" sounds far more win-win, again, IMHO.
Geez that is crazy!
Absolutely insane!
Pipeline is a cover up for whatever is under the ground, maybe some minerals or something like that, ask Mr Elon Musk.
@@RockStar-ev9fv def a possibility
Eminent domain in any instance is wrong. There was no reason to use the land prior, the government (or private in this case?) makes something to “require” eminent domain to be necessary? Nope. Sorry you didn’t think ahead and it takes more time/money, but there’s alternatives to every solution. You want to run a pipeline, pay for the right negotiated w the land owner. You wouldn’t think of using eminent domain on Russia, China, etc so stop treating citizens like they’re just temporary rental property that you collect taxes/payments from. Oh, that was a rant. 😊
@@bille4889 a rant yes but one that is accurate. Gov overreach at its finesr
incredible this and the cancer ugh!!!!
Absolutely! Always try to give the truth to people without getting cancelled.
will it affect citizens in Iowa as far as contamination?
Idk how it wouldn't in all honesty.
Yeah, you'll get carbon lung