Greenland's ice shelves are on verge of collapse, new research shows
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
- The warming oceans worldwide are leading to the rapid melting of ice and glaciers long thought to be stable. A new study co-authored by SJSU Assistant Professor and Oceanographer Mike Wood shows us just how dire the situation is becoming, and how the Bay Area could be impacted. abc7ne.ws/49smRMu
#greenland #glacier #climate #environment #abc7news
Let us hope the ice shelves are as optimistic as this videos title.
Mitigate sea level rise? I’m teaching my cat Mozart!
We're going to pump it into outer space where it'll be easier for the space tankers to haul it away to Mars for the planned colonization there.
Oh...
Mozart?
Seriously?
That's cool!
@@_rob_. Shhh don't give NASA any more grand ideas - they'll be asking for another trillion to fund BS studies on the idea.
It was a good run.
Yep.
Yeah sure......oh wait, I think I spotted the mars rover 😂
a fool and his beans are soon departed.
Iceland is green and Greenland 🇬🇱 is ice 🧊
Greenland was green during the Medieval warm period
Hurray, bring on the surf
AND NEVER MIND THE TURF!!
@@_rob_. we ain't no Smurf...
Didn't the old research say the same thing? I'm waiting for a video to come out that says, "ice melting problem solved".
New research sounds just like the old research well in summertime there is melting and then in the winter time well you know and it’s winter time now
Imagine not knowing ice melts
Imagine not knowing how melted ice works for a planet but only for a glass of water.
@@_rob_. Imagine a sea of bull feces. Imagine drowning in a sea of 'climate' bull feces.
@@_rob_. The central question here is not what you think but instead what you know, what do you suppose you know that presumably I don't?
I don't want to hear what you have been told - the BS flows on these presentations have reached record breaking levels but what YOU actually have knowledge of (ie what you "know.")
Imagine not knowing what happens to the water after the ice melts
@@Jc-ms5vv Imagine all the imagination involved in all the climate nonsense. I Think the Beatles did a tune about this.
- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago -
I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010.
Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe.
Today April 22, 2024 the state of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 96 thousand years ago.
On october 13, 2026 the state of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past.
On june 04, 2051 the state of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past.
On june 28, 2092 the state of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past.
On april 02, 2147 the state of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past.
The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago.
Mohamed BOUHAMIDA
we all need to see "Into the Ice" .. boots on the ground as it were. Nothing happening in Greenland is "natural."
I'm 65 and I've been told the ice sheets are going to be gone in a few years at least four times over the years but yet they're still there..
The reason Greenland's ice pack is so old is because Greenland is shaped like a bowl. It holds the ice.
And they said 1/3 of the ice sheet is gone around Greenland but yet sea level hasn't risen very much at all
You and I are the same age and I am....
soooooooo.....
grateful we didn't have the same teachers.
((or brains))
@@_rob_. if you're such a genius please point out where I'm incorrect ?
An your ignorant general criticism is pretty meaningless
@@_rob_. When is all this crap going to happen? I've been hearing it for 30+ years - its a scam looking for a 100 trillion dollar payoff. Has the climate of the USA changed? Where? Why hasn't it if its "global?"
Where is "sea level change" accelerating? Sea level change is local and undramatic. Some places it rises a few inches a century other places it falls a few inches per century. The continents are moving faster than this - get a grip. Id ask for a refund from your "educators" since they never required you to "think" in order to get your little pat on the head. So sad.
@@BarryBear58 You are not incorrect; you are arguing with trained parrots. They can only parrot what they have been told. They were "educated" in schools where thinking was a punishable offense.
If I may, I think some important terms might be getting mixed up here.
The ice /shelf/ refers to the ice that is attached to and surrounds Greenland but is floating on the ocean. That is falling apart quickly but itself has negligible effect on sea levels, though lots of potential to mess with the local salinity / throw off the Atlantic current.
The ice /sheet/ is the ice sitting on the island itself. That will take much longer to break up. The concern is that the ice shelf has been acting to lock in/ protect the ice sheet, and if compromised the ice sheet will probably break up much faster.
Duh.
Document Number: FBIS-SOV-2002-0808
Then y'all jump in your cars or hop on a plane.... connect the dots😢
"There are huge non climate effects of carbon dioxide which are overwhelmingly favorable which are not taken into account. To me that's the main issue that the earth is actually growing greener. This has been actually measured from satellites the whole earth is growing greener as a result of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. So it's increasing agricultural yields, it's increasing the forests, it's increasing all kinds of growth in the biological world and that's more important and more certain than the effects on climate." ~Freeman Dyson, Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey.
Plants in a greenhouse that are not limited for water or fertilizers will grow a faster if CO2 is increased. But the limitation of water and fertilizer means plants will not see the same benefit outside. Climate naysayers have long upheld CO2 fertilization as evidence that humans are doing the planet a solid by pumping 40 billion tons of fossil carbon into the air every year. It’s an argument that makes sense superficially, but falls apart as soon as you start to unpack it.
First and foremost,experts agree that CO2 fertilization is a temporary effect. The reason is simple: anything that limits growth, whether it’s sunlight, water, carbon, or even physical space, can only stimulate plants up to a point. Eventually, they run into some other resource limitation. This principle, called “Liebig’s law of the minimum,” was developed in agricultural science to explain why fertilizing a crop with plentiful nutrients doesn’t stimulate growth. It’s proven to be a very robust concept.
Too bad there's nothing anyone can do about it
Do you deny CO2 is a greenhouse gas?
@@hosnimubarak8869 No, I deny that there is anything meaningful you can do about it.
@@fatmork834
15,000 scientists disagree with you.
@@hosnimubarak8869 everyone used to think the world was flat. Lots of people can believe the same thing and also still be wrong
@@fatmork834
15,000... You think they are all wrong?
There is proof that the climate has changed all around Earth for millions of years. You have to be silly to think this is because we drive gas cars and such.
they keep saying this every year 😂😂 since the early 80s
...and now that it is past where we can do much about it, you'll get to live through the effects of laughing at a warning from scientists. Enjoy drought, and fire, followed by flooding and disease, then famine. Good job, you sure showed them.
We are in the end of the last Glaciation period, these glaciers and caps will melt completely as they have done hundreds of times before, then after a millennium we will enter another cooling period where the new glaciers cover most of the northern and southern hemisphere, if not for global warming mankind would not exist
Over the past 100 years, global temperatures have risen about 1 C. The rate of recent warming is 10x that of the gradual warming that ended the last glacial period.
Should we move to higher elevation?
@@LaughingAgain-jh6rq
"we"???
@@hosnimubarak8869 look back at several ice age termination events and it’s obvious the methane , CO2 and temperatures are 7x higher then the period you picked out, your statement simply isn’t accurate
@@delkreznor5173
What was Earths global temperature every time CO2 was high? What were sea levels?
Highest number of auroras seen as far south as southern border Texas in a year.. and lets talk about the ice crater. No.. lets talk about the sun, and the weakest magnetosphere in human recorded history. Lets talk about moderate to weak solar activity causing massive events on the planet. Lets talk about the geomagnetic poles racing faster and faster towards the equator. Lets talk about the potential decoupling of the crust from the mantle.. and subsequent 90 degree flip of the crust, and that flooding.
Ok "Q"... show me the measurements from the years 500, 800, 1,000, 1,500, and 1900 to show the "health" of the magnetosphere... But also, why does my compass still point North???
@@bobsbuurgers3714 The staggering lack of clarity.. just in your question alone. I dont have time to educate you. Sorry.. gotta work on that one yourself.
Are we still pretending this isn’t propaganda?
Huh? Science over suspicion
In what way? It’s merely facts
@johnp139 Every decade, it's something new. Put down the kool-aid.
@@giftedgreen2152brainless monkey
Lol not