At the beginning of every disaster movie they ignore people like this... | STROMBO
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 гру 2023
- There’s no question that climate change is affecting our world. Visit Greenland with me to put it in a first-hand perspective. Right now, the Greenland ice sheet is - on average - currently losing about 9000 tonnes of ice per second, day in and day out, throughout the year. Greenland’s ice alone is responsible for 17 percent of all global sea-level rise since 2006.
Follow STROMBO
On Twitter: / strombo
On Instagram: / strombo
On TikTok: / strombo
On Facebook: / strombo
Produced and Directed by Tania Natscheff
Camera: Anders Drud
CC license by Underground Channel underground...
Special thanks to Carlsbergfondet @Carlsbergfondet1876 - Розваги
Thank you for bringing awareness to a serious problem & sharing your trip to Greenland 🧊
If this were a disaster movie people would be chomping at the bit or cursing the politicians for not listening to the scientists.
The audience's silence is astounding.
Politicians only listen to money.
If this were a Biblical movie, some of us would be building boats by now.
Go everywhere Strombo and share it all with us. You are a poet.
Great piece, with information to make you think. Thank you for this mini documentary.
Thank you for showing us this. It is so important. I don’t know what it will take to wake people up, but this is one step in the right direction. Knowledge, along with the true facts, is power. I hope humans will use that power to make smart decisions.
The problem is that we'll meaning, compassionate people put all of their trust in the governments of the world to address and remediate the climate crisis while those very governments are the drivers of the overconsumption and waste that causes the destruction in the first place. This comes down to each and every one of us, including the wealthy, drastically changing our lifestyle. But that will take a drastic reduction of government as well as a ginormous amount of personal sacrifice and a new idea of "success"
Its not "governments are the drivers of the overconsumption", but the foundation of capitalism that our societies are built on. We need to push our governments to put in restrictions on companies to only produce items that last longer, use renewable's, use less plastic, etc. And in general, every company in the world is focused on profit, not sustainability. So although most 1st world countries populations are in decline, there is still an underlying need for more profit to satisfy the investor... So, imo, more and more inventive ways to generate money are leading to decisions that do not consider environment, only profit. I don't even know how we go about fixing that on a global scale.
Incredible video, George. So important!
Very interesting watch! Thank you for sharing this important information that most think isn’t a big deal. It is. ✌🏻
See comments from @OldScientist for some facts.
Yep. Most people don't like gloomy pessimistic outlooks, which is part of reality. This is a weakness in humans. Doomed for humanity?
Thank you for sharing your knowledge about climate change. I hope we can all do more sooner than later🙏🏻
Let’s do more by doing less. 😏🫤
@@christinearmington yes and stop wrapping our food in plastic
I’d love to see more of George travelling around the world videos.
Good idea to watch travel videos and skip the traveling yourself. Boeing is making 340 more jets this year. Can we imagine the impact of mining, refining, manufacturing, and building these planes along with the fuel use when they're airborne? Three million people flew in the US on the Sunday after Thanksgiving (that's in ONE DAY!) Few people in the US want to be 'inconvenienced by the death of the planet. Eat fast food, buy plastic crap, etc. etc.
Less is more. 🤨
1988 "Save the world" (CO2 351ppm)
1994 "Recycle, reuse, reduce" (CO2 358ppm)
2010 "Carbon footprint" (CO2 390ppm)
2023 "Human innovation will figure it out." (C02 418ppm)
2033 "Grandpa, why didn't anyone fix this when it was still possible?" Global crop failure, war, diseases and mass migration. (CO2 level: "carbonated sea water")
Yeah, switching to diesel cars; carbon capture and storag; 'clean coal'; 'clean gas'; carbon offsets; ban on straws, stirrers and cotton buds; biofuels; energy from waste (incineration). I'm sure I've missed some out.
Who SAid SO The Lies OF Gov For TAX & CONTROL Its A Solar Cycle Gov Lies YOU PAY Like Fluoride In The water Stupid BY LAW
Compare and know the parable. When to many fish or a rapidly multiplying species of fish are placed in a fish tank they will die with time. When a species like man is given domain over this small planet to populate and abuse this planets biological network then both the species of man will be its own demise and the demise of almost all life found here as well.
Thanks George, for taking the time to learn how the ice sheet is changing! With the world in perpetual chaos with front-burner issues, it can be challenging to remind folks about climate change boiling away on the back burner. 💙
For climate scientists, it’s definitely fantastic when someone so high impact bumps our climate change messaging. Makes me think that it would be so very nice, if IPCC/UNFCCC actually had UN climate ambassadors.
And yes, everyone, sometimes I talk, like that, when I’m, like, formulating, like, complex thoughts on the, like, spot. Like. Like. 🤭
Thank you for this update.
The crevasses form due to ice flowing faster than it can stretch. That's interesting but a warning too.
I don't know the formula but obviously it must flow fastest at surface with decreasing speed down to bedrock where the friction is, like a stack of something toppling always falling forward. The great age of the ice near the bedrock indicates that it barely moves at all.
Hey George, nice to see you have a show looking to address global warming. Do not waste time trying to present the facts surrounding the science. There are lots of folks doing that. However, there are few out there presenting the things we have to do. Most people are at a loss for being able to know what to do. What jobs are stable? Where should I live? How can I help?
There is very little guidance for folks at the bottom, or in the middle even. Canadians need hope and have to transition to certain professions. Top on that list is forest fire fighters. We need more than just people, we need to make forest management a top priority. We need to retain healthy forests so the carbon can be sequestered. So we can't let the forests burn down. Those that fight the fires must be seen as the front line hero's of our battle against global warming. It would be a distinctly useful take for a show, to help folks to choose the roles they will take on, to push Team Human forward.
Good Luck George!
What to do at this point (when we are at the brink of complete global collapse):
* stop all the fossil fuels industries
* stop the animal agriculture industries all together
* stop the entire fishing industry
* stop flying completely
* stop all the burning of the rainforests
This is the only think that would save us. Do you see any of that happening anytime soon? Like in the next year or two? Because nothing short of that will save us; anyone who actually read the climate reports will know we are completely doomed. We have maybe five or ten years of relative normality left before global ecosystems start collapsing and after that you will start seeing society’s collapse very quickly.
This is were greed and selfishness and complete disregard for the planet we live off of has gotten us.
@@josephinenilsson1541 the list is much larger and requires folks to engage locally. Yes, civilization will collapse if people do not take up the yoke of service. Naming what has to be done implies understanding that should be done, but everyone seems to be waiting for something. If people move or engage in the appropriate actions for them, we can push the system to respond. It is already happening. Slowly, and it is mostly unseen by people blinded by theatrics. It is good to understand the whole, but we as individuals must make personal choices.
I understand that many people are at a loss to imagine humans acting together on this scale. They are often convinced of our failure, before we have tried. Being convinced of failure causes one to think that nothing is worth doing. That is not true though. We still have the ability to respond in a beneficial manner. There are better outcomes than decending into chaos and anarchy. We can create opportunities for life. That is purposeful even if humans eventually go extinct. Extinction events can vary heavily in the percentage of lifeforms lost. We can change the outcome if we act. With 8 billion people, we can move mountains, clean up our toxic waste and secure radioactive material far underground. Action is the only way to resolve despair within ourselves, and fix this society that is ripping itself apart. Don't fight or argue with those otherwise motivated to conflict. Just act... Do that instead of wasting time on idiots and fossil fuel trolls. You will improve your community and engage with others actively changing the game.
!Go Team Human!
We either reduce our resource consumption or mother nature will do it for us.
Tbh, I think Mother Nature is out of the picture at this point. Humans move more material than all of nature's processes combined. And we are literally changing the chemistry of the biosphere with our emissions. 60% of all land-based fauna has disappeared (let alone marine life) in just a span of 60 years because of overdevelopment and consumption. This is an Extinction level event already. And industrial capitalists are the cause. Aside from a catastrophic volcano eruption or large bolide striking Earth whatever happens from here on out is purely due to humans.
Exactly!
B.S Gov Lies
@@jimthain8777 They Corp Gov Is Depopultion Your Next Nuclear Lies Come DUE In The Cancer Lotto
Bingo 😬😳
Refreshing to hear a young non musty, non beardy scientist explain things & feelings, i imagine young Liam took one look at the beautiful women of Copenhagen & Denmark generally and, went yeah!
I have watched this info., for years. Even, I believe it was David Suzuki, showed that they have ripped up so much of the rainforest (things we can't control) if they just replanted just that, it would help the most. For an individual, it is impossible. Each individual feels like "I can't help".
It’s a done deal, was too late to stop it in the 1980s… You can largely blame Exxon and Reagan.
It wasn’t too late in the 80’s, but you are right in that it is now. We could have made the world into whatever we wanted, but we decided to exploit it until collapse instead. It’s absolutely heartbreaking.
Thank you
Yeah we're toasted peanut butter & meat sauce. This is our last stable decade on Earth.
Limiting warming to 1.5C only slows the melting. We need a few centuries of -.5C to restore the ice that moderated our weather so perfectly.
Isn’t it amazing how going from roughly 3 parts in 10,000 atmospheric CO2 to a little more than four parts in 10,000 CO2 can alter the climate so drastically. Do you think maybe there’s more to climate change than just CO2?
Yes, methane being released from warming permafrost. By the way, it’s the percentage increase in CO2 that’s significant, not the percentage increase in the entire atmosphere.
You should have went and met that Greenlander who has her own UA-cam channel Q lol I just watched the video before you did meet her lol awesome . I remember watching you George with my grandma way back she passed now. been a huge fan as a Toronto resident since I was really young I’m 41 now . Just found your Channel brother respect
Ice never melts, Ice never freezes, Ice never moves, and government paid for propaganda never lies.
Thanks for eye opener comrade!
Wow..
I'm really excited for arctic oil rigs in the next few years
Hopefully you’re excited for no food on the shelves
I’ve seen a few mega crevasses in my day 😅
Cracks in ice!!!!! We doomed......😢
JK. 😂😂😂😂😂
11:20+ Obviously it's good for a person to imbibe an extra curriculum but it really shouldn't have to be up to the (A) scientist to define economic policy as well as work to discover the science. This is proof of the tragedy that is happening within major governments who for the most part still appear to be more focused on gaining a quick and easy populist vote rather than doing the proper job of managing the population's health and safety. And the one common denominator among predominantly right-wing governments and think tanks is their avoidance of health and safety measures. They have literally created a cultural mindset that reveres an abuse of energy resources but that doubts halcyon.
💚Keep up the good work peeps.
Politicians work for their billionaire overlords - votes are irrelevant to them because the elections are rigged by the billionaires - rigged elections go back to the days of the founding forefathers who were members of secret society criminal cartels - which are historically controlled by the Rothschilds money - if you are actually unaware of this, you should probably study upon it - which includes understanding the depopulation that's going on - since it's plastered all over their websites, including the maps of their targeted regions, to be unaware of this is to be one of their targeted victims.
Brought to you by the NWO
Thanks for the honesty. Now ef off and leave the intelligent conversation to the adults.
Since the WEF brags about their depopulation agenda on their website, since their say billions will die over the next 12 months, followed by billions more after that, since they've uploaded maps with their targeted regions - worldwide - to be in denial that you're targeted for murder is to have the mind of a child.
Please go to your local college where you can take their academic placement test - then listen carefully as your adolescent scores in "Comprehension" are explained to you. Thank you, REMIGIOPEREIRA for telling the truth - I apologize for the overgrown child that is programmed and indoctrinated to spew the lies of the evil overlords that control this world while siphoning 99% of the world wealth into their control as billions of babies and children, teens and adults suffer in horrifying poverty... smh
Mr. Schwab said that if I pay more taxes and eat bugs the weather will be better.
@@bluegold21 enjoy being dumbed down in mass….have at it…
Great awakening of these huge crevasses I did not realise there were so many! This actually reminds me of a great UA-cam movie called Ice which has these crevasses Highly recommended a Must See
With our wonderNZ actor Sam Neil and others well known actors 🕊🌏💖
Thank you for this tip, 'Ice' is on my watch list now!
ua-cam.com/video/INxRqDnY_BY/v-deo.html
Bro, I feel grief and sorrow and I’m not into the climate at all. We took a paradise and paved it, mined it, deforested it, over grazed it, and over populated it. I hope our population numbers are reduced to pre industrial levels. That’s the only way humanity will learn.
You hope population numbers are reduced?? Are you actually serious. Well you will probably get what you wish for but not in the way you are expecting. Historical science tells us that when a government controls people's main food source it usually leads to mass starvation of its people. Starvation as a war tactic is a thing ya know. ☹️ what better to convince you to get rid of your methane producing cattle than to fear monger you into not eating them. And using a known shift in climate to do so. What better way to get you to be ok with people dying if you believe people are the cause. Clearly you already are..
Co2 has been way higher in the past and usually follows the warming not causing it.
Lifestyle is not a movie
I went to the roller rink and saw lots of roller skates!
I went inside your head and found just two brain cells.
New video of green leend upload please 🥺
Whats the right amout of carbon for the atmosphere? Less than 150 ppm and plants die. Carbon isn't the problem. Who paying these researchers?
The more CO2 the better!
The last four interglacials lasted over ~20,000 years with the warmest portion being a relatively stable period of 10,000 to 15,000 years duration. Our current warming is well within natural variation, and in view of the general decline in temperatures during the last half of this interglacial, is probably beneficial for mankind and most plants and animals. Long-term, temperatures are now declining (for the last 3,000 years), and we appear to be headed for the next 90,000 year ice age, right on schedule at the end of our current 10,000 year warm period. We have repeated this cycle 46 times in succession over the last 2.6 million years. And in case you are wondering, the previous Antarctic ice cores tell a broadly similar story. The following graph of ice core data from Vostok (vertical scale in degrees C variation from present) shows that Antarctica is also experiencing a long-term (4,000 year) cooling trend mirroring the Greenland GISP2 cooling trend. Though the individual temperature spikes and dips are different than in Greenland, the long-term temperature trend on the planet appears to be down, not up. And since it is so late in our current interglacial period, we could be concerned about global cooling. My main point is that natural variation is so large, even if we cease all emissions completely, the climate will still change (just look at the graphs). The cost of (possibly) slightly influencing this change is so great, why not spend a lot less adapting to it? Since we don’t know if the long-term climate is cooling or warming (I bet on cooling long-term), we could spend trillions to cut emissions, only to have the climate cool catastrophically on its own. Warming is not a killer, but global cooling is. It would only take a few years of global crop failures from cold weather to put populations at serious risk. Both the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets are thickening: Leave anything on the ice, and it gets buried pretty fast (for example: the US South Pole Base was recently reconstructed because the old base was being crushed by snow and ice, and WWII planes lost on Greenland’s southeast coast, were covered by 264 feet of ice in 50 years: see the image below). This is not rocket science. Sure, the sea-level edges are retreating (that is why we call them the ablation zones of a glacier), but they represent a minute portion of the continent-scale ice mass.
Are you sure this data really means anything to a person who is willing to emit more CO2 on a chopper to preach others not to emit more CO2. This ain’t about science
Fun fact: we’re pumping c02 into the atmosphere ten times faster than the petm extinction event
@Jc-ms5vv Another fun fact, volcanoes 🌋 produce 80 times more co2 than humans. They can't tax volcanoes though.
@@Wardaddy51-50 No they don’t
Human activities emit 60 or more times the amount of carbon dioxide released by volcanoes each year. Large, violent eruptions may match the rate of human emissions for the few hours that they last, but they are too rare and fleeting to rival humanity’s annual emissions. In fact, several individual U.S. states emit more carbon dioxide in a year than all the volcanoes on the planet combined do.
What a shit copy/paste based on information from decades ago. Plus, many charts that skeptics look at do not show the last 70 years of warming. Please read some new news.
How about staying at home and not adding to the problem just for UA-cam hits? People like you have accelerated the entire process.
Do we not see a temperature spike, co2 spike, and methane spike at the end of the interglacial warming period. Which we are towards the end of. Why do people deny natural climate change? Interglacial warming period only last so long. And time is about up. This has happened 46 times in 2.6 million years. One difference is the polar pole is over Arctic ocean and not Greenland this time. Confused look up polar drift or true polar wander. Since we cut emissions in 70's planet has warmed. This is called global brightening. Which less clouds and emission allow for more solar radiation to heat planet. Global dimming continued from 1950s until 1980s. After 1980s, global dimming started to reverse, alongside reductions in particulate emissions, in what has been described as global brightening. Then we cut so2 ship track emissions which cause condensation. Tonga volcano added 14% more moisture to atmosphere. Now we see a drought in the Caribbean and ocean boiling event after cutting so2. So most of the warming is actually from reductions in particulate emissions. Allowing more solar radiation to heat things. Co2 don't heat up by itself. That co2 spike actually cools planet. Insulation works both ways to keep things warm and to keep things cool. Co2 has a super cooling effect just like methane too. Satellite data have recently revealed that between 2002 and 2019, the mesosphere and lower thermosphere cooled by 3.1 degrees F (1.7 degrees C ). Mlynczak estimates that the doubling of CO2 levels thought likely by later this century will cause a cooling in these zones of around 13.5 degrees F (7.5 degrees C), which is between two and three times faster than the average warming expected at ground level.
Because the last natural thermal maximum was only 700 years ago, and a cording to all the cycles (Milankovitch and others) indicate that we are supposed to be cooling right now, glaciers are supposed to be growing, atmospheric carbon is supposed to be reducing.
Instead we have shot atmospheric carbon up high above where it was 700 years ago. Actually considerably above where it has been the last million years. You know the last million years of stability that has seen the evolution of the modern ecosystem and the dawn of human civilization. We are outside that now.
And the temperature has already risen above the last few thermal maximums, and still rising. The last 3 decades have obliterated 700 years of cooling, and it is still rising. We are now also rising above anything seen in the last million years, since we were already close to the top and went up from there. So a hotter planet than humanity has ever seen, and rising.
And glaciers that are supposed to be growing are shrinking fast, some mountain regions have already seen nearly 50% reduction in ice mass. If the polar regions do that we will see mass human tragedy.
Most natural "spikes" in atmospheric carbon take a thousand years. This one we created has happened in less than 50 years, and it is bigger than the natural ones, and it is still moving upwards.
There is no natural explanation for the recent atmospheric carbon, rising temperatures and shrinking glaciers. No unusual volcanic activity, no asteroid, no weird microorganisms blooms. The only explanation is human caused atmospheric carbon increase due to reduction of natural carbon sinks at the same time as us dumping billion so tonnes of carbon into the air. And it is having consequences.
Nothing will stop this! What’s the point of freaking out! Move inland!
Us stopping burning fossil fuels and transforming civilization to fit the laws of nature will stop this. Moving inland won't solve the fact that we are pushing the whole planet towards a mass extinction event with our emissions, pollution, and other destruction.
"Greenland ice sheet mass balance from 1840 through next week." (Mankoff et al., 2021). If you examine Fig.2 on page 5, you will see there would be no correlation with the exponential increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide (280ppm to 420ppm) and the change in the annual Mass Balance Sum shown in the paper. Indeed there have been periods of increasing mass of the Greenland ice cap in the 1940's, 70's, 80's and 90's. (Remember CO2 was rising all the time.)
More recently Greenland Total Ice Mass Balance rate of loss reached its maximum in 2012 but the trend rate of loss has been diminishing ever since. That's while we've added 500 million tonnes of CO2 to the atmosphere (14% of total human emissions). The average annual loss is 0.005% of the total mass. That's neglible. Come back in 20,000 years.
Oh My Fake God! What right-wing corporate drivel of a rag did you cut and paste that BS from.
Since you're challenging someone with scientific degrees, I think it's only fair that you share your credentials.
What education do you have that will assure any of us, that your reading of the data is accurate?
Otherwise I'm going to look at your comment as just another Internet expert, and we all know the credibility, (or lack thereof) of those people, right?
Geologist Gregg Braden points out when one thinks about climate, one needs to think in time spams of thousands of years.
ua-cam.com/video/phWnY9dunV8/v-deo.htmlsi=XqYFuxFJbQ3JrG6J
CO2 is a tiny fraction of atmospheric gases - the timeline for CO2 in ice cores is a scam because every summer, the ice rapidly melts into surface rivers, moulins and waterfalls and every time a volcano erupts, thousands of surface lakes appear, along with surface rivers and moulins and waterfalls crash over the edge of the ice walls - in addition to this, we see the Ross Ice Shelf rapidly melting, Thwaites rapidly melting, Lambert ... and dozens of others while the true timeline for the ice sheets is documented - by our ancestors - in historic records - if you don't know how the ice sheet formed so rapidly, then do decades of research - I'm a Doctoral Scholar with over 50 years of research - I do my research in dozens of languages and I've studied Chemistry and Physics for decades, Geological Formations, Wave Propagation and Cataclysms for decades - and the public is being lied to - CO2 and SLR are irrelevant - what matters is the colossal glaciers that are sliding into the sea - and that the timeline for previous cataclysms is documented - by our ancestors - in historic records - so we know when and how the tectonic plates were broken and subducted while the public is spoon-fed silly theories to dumb them down.
So what, humans will adapt, their was life when fossel fuel carbon was sequestered by plant life , you get paid to play and promote a theory , no crisis, the real crisis will be mass starvation that will happen in a fossel fuel free world
I think the correct response is "so what, the Earth will adapt. It won't miss people"
Who's financing your research????
Def not a bunch of punk bands at a house party.
NASA
Scientific researchers have no interests besides accurate science. Why try and false equivalence this topic with fossil fuel sponsored junk science?
NWO
Who's telling you how many question marks to use? I'm fairly sure only one is needed but go ahead. Make yourself look stupid.
If you guys had any shame would you still do trash schoolboy social media??click baited nonsense..get a real job...
How much fuel did you waste making this video?
Time for us all to stop taking unnecessary trips, don’t you think?
They need to prove what we already know ...
It appears that you need a Woman wearing a bikini, there's not nearly enough views on this crucial subject.
I think a major problem with the perception of the subject is that people believe global warming will just make beaches more comfortable and the sea warmer to swim in. You can defo thank commercialism for that. And that sector is all travel-sponsored.
SLR has been minimal because of the billions of gigatons of sand that's extracted along the coasts of Africa, Australia, South Asia, etc., while rivers and canals are dredged - worldwide - in Hawaii, huge piles of debris are hauled out from coastal seafloors and plopped onto the beaches for all the world to sea while the "scientific" ones scream about SLR ... Now if only you could admit that thousands of colossal glaciers are sliding into the sea, and if you could conceptualize what happens when thousands of colossal glaciers slam into the seafloor as they displace massive volumes of seafloor, you might have the makings of an intelligent conversation.
Most people don’t read
Don't worry when the next ice age comes you'll be glad of every bit of carbon in the atmosphere, plants need more not less.
You obviously have no clue what you are talking about! Maybe we should give you pure oxygen to breath to see how well you do!
At 40 degrees Celcius plants can't metabolise. Looks like people are soon going to be building a wall to stop idiots like you moving north. And FYI the scenario we are in is leading us to a world where the equatorial regions are uninhabitable and the poles become tropical with far less room for lifeforms to thrive. Do you seriously think you will be first in line to grab some northern prop? Wake up!
We’ll be extinct from the incoming hot house earth
Couldn’t you omit the annoying music? It trivializes the material you’re conveying.
Says the guy flying a helicopter
Summer 2023 was one of the coldest in decades in the Arctic, and May 2023 was the coldest on record there. The Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance (SMB) for the 11 months to September 2023 is a massive 450 billion tonnes of ice accumulated. 5 out of the last 7 years have seen huge accumulations above the average (1981-2010). Data from NOAA (2022 Arctic Report Card) show winter (March) ice coverage has hardly changed since '79, and that the summer (September) coverage trend had stopped declining since 2007. In September 2022, sea ice reached a minimum extent of 4.87 million square kilometers in the Arctic, and September, 2023 was 4.23. Both of these are higher than the extent in 2007, which means the Arctic summer sea ice trend is zero for the past 16 years. It was almost as high as 1995. But you won't be told any of these facts on the news. They don't fit the story. Because that's what it is - make-believe.
Dude, 2023 was the warmest year on record. Stop reading bs right wing oil cartel fake reports. Listen to the people who live there and they will tell your nuts.
& the penguins are dying in antarctica because of ceaseless rain & melting. I don't know where you're living? But on a warming planet ice diminishes, it's well documented! Stop with the bullshit!
Oh My Fake God! What right-wing corporate drivel of a rag did you cut and paste that BS from.
BS!
The Canadian Arctic broke temperature records in many places this year.
On top of that it had one of the longest fire seasons they've ever had.
There were still active fires in September and October.
The Arctic has usually begun to cool down by that time.
It's not unheard of to have snow in September.
Not THIS year.
We had northern communities that had to evacuate due to fires this past fall.
One village no longer exists at all.
Your inaccurate lies are an affront to the people who lost homes and livelihoods in my country!
@@jimthain8777 I'm sure glad someone is paying attention!!!
stop breaking it more with your stick in the ice
Does anyone not see the rank hypocrisy in this video? The underlying belief is "climate change" (still to be defined), which is fed off of the false belief that CO2 (plant food) is bad (from fossil fuel emissions).
Go to the 0:43 mark (airplane), 0:44 mark (old school SUV) and 0:45 mark (helicopter), and you'll see the modes of transportation that the Host of this video utilized (all of which are large quantity fossil fuel consuming modes of transportation). Then he's going to tell us how bad climate change is, all while he concurrently benefits from the very artifacts that are (supposedly) the root cause of the so called problem. How hypocritical can one be!
Even if you don't believe the data or your own eyes. When you burn shit it creates heat trapping gases, it's simple physics that a child can understand!
How are they supposed to get there, by balloon!?
Darwin has something to say about life that can't see or predict a threat. Shame people like you are the threat. It's hard to tell a brainless falling rock to stop falling.
Edward, important people are allowed to concoct lies to justify their insanity - I'm sure you know that.
@@SoulfulTruth Are you being sarcastic or in actual agreement with the person who is unashamedly telling lies?
Pushers of the climate scam. Please go back to interviewing musicians.
Are you a troll or simply a frightened child? I get why you're in denial, but saying it's a scam is pure idiocy!
What does that even mean? When did you ever see a trend of scientists interviewing musicians? JFC!
So this scares you so much that you have to write it off as a "scam", so you can sleep at night?
It's far better to take action than to be scared!
Strombo is washed up disappointment
0.04%.
Pumping c02 into the atmosphere ten times faster than the petm extinction event
@@Jc-ms5vvThat sure melted the fk out of those ice caps on Mars.