Do you think this war could have been avoided? ♦The best way to support our work is by becoming a member, here on UA-cam or on Patreon: ua-cam.com/users/Knowledgiajoin www.patreon.com/Knowledgia ♦By doing so you will be able to watch our videos FIRST and with No Ads. And you will support us a lot, as any dollar helps immensely in our production process. Thank you for your consideration!
@@Smiling-Monk Hindu Maharaja(who was imposed by British not local): KIlls tens of thousands of Muslims atleast Muslims: Rebel India: oH LOOk aT ThE tErroRIsTsss
As a Pakistani, thank you for making a neutral perspective of the war. A lot of both Indians and Pakistanis in this comment section should realise that history is something that should not be tampered with due to their political and personal beliefs.
@@SheksgemWhepdoand what makes Pakistan not an occupation??? India and Palestine both were the British colonies, while Israel and Pakistan both were created by the colonizers, creation of both these lead to chaos, migrations and unrest, just coz Pakistan( and Bangladesh) is a muslim nation and it's suits your agenda thus you gonna reveal your double standards??? Huh??? what is your defination of an occupation wouldn't change the narravative of what you want to portray, We have seen what Syrians had did with the Yazidis or better what Pakistani had themsleves did with the native Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistani occupied Punjab or Hindus of east Bengal(Bangladesh) during the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971, so better don't act that as if you really care about the DNA ancestry and all, Pakistan is an occupation since it was made on the land of Hindus, creation of Pakistan lead to choas, unrest and unwanted migrations, 14th Augast is an establishment day of Pakistan( and Bangladesh), or we can say that an independence day of Pakistan from India
As a Pakistani, this gave me much more information about the first Indo-Pakistani War. This is an amazing video btw I feel sad for those Indians and Pakistani's that died in this war. I would love to see a video of the other Indo-Pakistani wars. Great vid!
@@sourabhsingh5051 Never happening. There's no reason for Pakistan (or Pakistani army to be more precise) to even exist if they don't keep up the narrative that India is an enemy (which we're not, in principle). Peace between India and Pakistan is IMPOSSIBLE. It may happen if someday Pakistan balkanizes or somehow the Army goes out of power (very unlikely).
@@Argdut1106 Pakistan's regions would still be Muslim majority even if Pakistan balkanizes,which has less chances than the balkanization of India, which had more separatist movements in Kashmir,Indian Panjab,North-East, and the Sikh freedom movements. The feeling will always remain for those living in borders of today's Pakistan because the population would be Muslims
Duriing Partition Public votes in the favour of Pakistan & Pakistan is asking for refrendum since 1958. Partition was based on religion & both decided that we will take land in which there is our religious majority & kashmir was Muslim majority but the leadr of kashmir was British puppet who deny to give Pakistan rights & created a conflict. Which is in favour of British.
Minority Hindus persecuted by Pakistanis should be allowed to settle down in J&K. Maharaja Hari Singh has agreed & signed to join India. It's time for the development of J&K.
Battkes won by India during the first Kashmir war Battle of Shelatang (7 November 1947) - A decisive battle where Indian forces halted the advance of tribal invaders towards Srinagar. Battle of Shalateng (7 November 1947) - Often cited along with Shelatang, it was a significant engagement where Indian forces launched a counter-offensive to secure Srinagar. Battle of Badgam (3 November 1947) - Indian forces engaged the tribal invaders, which included the famous actions of Major Somnath Sharma, who was posthumously awarded the Param Vir Chakra. Battle of Zoji La (1 November 1948) - Indian forces used tanks at high altitudes for the first time to push back Pakistani forces and secure the pass. Operation Bison (13-15 November 1948) - An operation that led to the capture of Dras, Kargil, and ultimately, Leh. Battle of Naushera (January-February 1948) - A series of engagements to defend the strategic town of Naushera. Battle of Jhangar (December 1947 - February 1948) - Key battles around the town of Jhangar, with Indian forces initially losing and then recapturing the town. Battle of Tithwal (May 1948) - Indian forces recaptured the Tithwal region from Pakistani forces. Battle of Poonch (November 1947 - November 1948) - A prolonged siege where Indian forces successfully defended Poonch and eventually lifted the siege. Battle of Rajouri (April 1948) - Indian forces liberated Rajouri from Pakistani invaders.
@@waytogo11 Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,
@@护花铃 Aksai Chin was not yours after the fall of QING Dynasty. It ended at that time the taipinh Rebellion and other anti-imperialistic uprisings against Qing. The Sikhs invaded along with the British Raj forces captured the Aksai Chin and renamed into Aksai Hind. Can't you type your comment and reply in English instead of typing in mandarin. I can't understand your Han chinese mandarin writings. Next replies write in English
I think nobody would notice that as a big deal, since the point of interest is in Kashmir, also, it would be really distracting to the audience as the important parts of the story is north, not south west.
@@AaronTheGreat________Duriing Partition Public votes in the favour of Pakistan & Pakistan is asking for refrendum since 1958. Partition was based on religion & both decided that we will take land in which there is our religious majority & kashmir was Muslim majority but the leadr of kashmir was British puppet who deny to give Pakistan rights & created a conflict. Which is in favour of British.
Yeah, On 65,When Paxtan failed to Capture initial goal of Kashmir, In 71, When India SLASHED and Destroyed Paxtan into 2 and Took 90,000+ Paxtani Troops who surrendered to India in what is called the Largest Surrender since WW 2, In 83, India Captured Siachen,in 99 India destroyed Paxtani regulars in Kargil etc Just look at the Size of the Economies, India's Per Capita used to be 50% of Paxtan in 1990,Today India's Per Capita in 200% of Paxtan, India is a Rising Global Technological, Military, Industrial Financial and Economic Power
it was Pakistan who declared war on India in order annexe regions like Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan choose to go on war with India in 1965 because at that time the US had given Pakistan advanced weapons and jets giving Pak army and airforce an edge But even after all this, Pakistan failed to achieve its objectives and was forced to agree for the ceasefire Both India and Pakistan claim victory for the 1965 war, but it's considered as an Indian victory as India successfully defended against Pakistani attacks and also captured Lahore during the counter offensive while Pakistan failed to achieve its goals and also faced more loss and casualties compared to India
@@darthvader5558 I suppose strategic miscalculations by both India and Pakistan ensured that the war ended in a stalemate. I am not in any offence to India rather I just want to continue to accept our history and redefine the atmosphere of hatred created by both side's establishment since the Partition plan.
The real "Kashmir" region (Kashmir Valley or the Jhelum River Valley) was at war in the first war for a very short period. Most of the war was in the Jammu division (Jhangar, Poonch, Rajouri, Mirpur, Kotli, etc.). In the Kashmir Division, only the Western region (Baramulla, Gulmarg, Sopore) came under Pakistani occupation before being pushed back, even out of Uri. While India could have liverated further up till Muzaffarabad, it was decided that the troops guarding the Kashmir division should instead be diverted south to end the Siege of Poonch. As for the Trans Himalayan theatre (Gilgit, Skardu, Kargil and Leh), you didnt mention that there was direct British intervention and support towards the Pakistani side in the Rebellion of the Gilgit Scouts. The British did not want India to have a direct land border with Afghanistan and hence, the Soviet Union. One of the greatest moments of this war was towards the end, when a group of scouts left the Indian Himalayan town of Manali in search of a path through uncharted Himalayas towards the Buddhist city of Leh trying to survive the Pakistani siege. The expedition to find a path to Leh was so successful that the Leh-Manali highway is still used to this day to reach Leh and Kargil without going through Kashmir Valley. Subsequently, this was also the very first war where tanks were used in high altitude and worked, in pushing the Pakistanis out of Drass, Kargil and Leh, but sadly could not reach Skardu before the ceasefire.
Forgot to mention, many parts of Jammu and Kashmir, like South Kashmir (Anantnag, Avantipora, Verinag, Qazigund, Pahalgam) , Jammu city, and northern and eastern parts of Jammu division like Ramban, Udhampur, Doda, Reasi and Kishtwar had never been part of any war.
The indian military couldn't because they couldn't spread and refoce their allies due the indian military had to defend and push back other pakistani forces. @xijinpig8982
@@osmanamjid2432 No problem. I hope you are enjoying your beggar lifestyle there. I increasingly notice that your people are all over in other countries trying to escape the horrible situation in Pakistan. I can only congratulate you, and I don't judge you. Hope your loyalty to a country that can't hold a free and fair election and has never had an elected PM complete their full term pays off 😊
@Akarsh2008 He moved to the uk , worked there in factories in 60s, 70s, then retired in the 80s , lived his last two decades on pension , with his all family, till his death.
Soon East Punjab became khalistan and India cut off from illegally Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir and Kashmir merged with Pakistan inshAllah and Kashmir issue solved forever InshAllah.
@@intellectualcucumber looking at 1948 Hyderabad's geography and demographics, it would have acceded to India sooner or later, probably with much more violence
I am from poonch region and the Pakistani version of maharaja being a tyrant is absolutely true . 17 people/fighters of my village gave up their lives fighting the dogra army. Our war has nothing to do with India to begin with . We just wanted freedom from tyranny and a large number of our people being world war veterans helped
@Akarsh2008not because of neighbouring villages.. it was because west Pakistan didn't have a major port.. since Kolkata was given to india despite much demands from Muslim league the Britishers chose to give Karachi as compensation
@Akarsh2008Going by this logic, there were many Muslim majority areas in UP, CP & South so should have they gone to Pakistan?? British only advocated for division of Punjab & Bengal.
At 6:24 in the video it states what "exactly happened isn't known" - that's because the people it happened to, haven't been asked. Imagine trying to document the holocaust without the survivors stories?! My grandparents are from the region and they experienced what happened. Hundreds of thousands like them survived to tell the tale of what happened to our people. The Maharaja was a tyrant - he was disliked by the population of the region, especially the Muslim majority because of his anti Muslim policies, alongside the high taxes, deliberately aimed to drive away the poor rural population. Our grandparents often talked about how they were told of better times during the Sikh Empire, especially the rule of Ranjeet Singh, who had controlled parts of Jammu and Kashmir as part of his empire. When the Maharaja's forces went to disarm the muslims, it was not limited to poonch, it was wide spread in Muslim regions of Jammu and Kashmir. They even took farming tools and axes so people couldn't use them to resist. Following that right wing hindu mobs alongside the maharaja's forces burned, looted, killed and raped their way through the villages of Jammu and Kashmir, in a progrom similar to what has happened to the Rohingya of Myanmar. This caused hundreds of thousands of refugees and started the military conflict - where the Kashmiri tribes and Pukhtun tribes joined.
The power to decide whether to remain independent / chose between India and Pakistan was under the British Parliament's Lapse of Paramountcy Act was given to the Ruler and not to the public. Pakistan should have challenged this Act in the House of Lords - Gilgit , Hunza , Baltistan , Mirpur , Muzzafarabad and also Chitral were parts of erstwhile Riyasat of Jammu and Kashmir which, in 1947 , legally acceded, in its entirety to India. Riyasats like Jammu and Kashmir , Kalat , Bahawalpur , Umerkot etc were covered under the Lapse of Paramountcy Act of British Parliament. We cannot be selective. Pakistan has absolutely no claim ,whether legal or moral , on even an inch sq of territory of the erstwhile Riyasat of Jammu and Kashm ................................................................................................................
Yep, definitely we need that, I need TO learn Indian history and having a neutral and great video explaining that could be useful for knowledge hungry students like me.
India 🇮🇳 has much more legitimacy over Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh as: 1) Historically J&K and Ladakh have been parts of Indian empires such as Mauryas and Sikhs. Ladakh is a Buddhist majority area of India just like Sikkim or Arunachal. If they join China/Pakistan, their rights will be taken just like Tibet. 2) The King of Jammu & Kashmir signed an instrument to join India. It was later Pakistan who got angry and started terr○rising Jammu & Kashmir. Before the King's decision of joining India, Pakistan did not even care about Kashmir. 3) There are many important Temples like Vaishno Devi & Amarnath Temple in Kashmir. They are extremely sacred for Hindus. Meanwhile there is no reason for Pakistan to go to Kashmir. 4) If you look at Jammu & Kashmir and the Pakistani illegally occupied part of Kashmir today, there is a huge difference. Jammu & Kashmir is one of most visited tourist regions of India. Meanwhile nobody goes to Pakistan illegally occupied Kashmir. 5) In Kashmir India has hosted G20 Meeting, will host Miss World in few days, will post International Automobile Expo, has already hosted many international seminars and much more. On other hand Pakistan illegally occupied Kashmir has hosted terr○r groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba, Hizbul and Jaish-e-Muhammad. 6) India built world's highest rail bridge in Jammu & Kashmir. India built Asia's longest tunnel in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. India built first class infrastructure especially in Lal Chowk, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir. On other hand, people of Pakistan illegally occupied Kashmir don't even have flour to eat. 7) Most important of all: Kashmir is named after a Hindu sage named Kashyap, who lived in that area. "Mir" means lake. The region has a lake named after sage Kashyap. Thus "KashMir." Pakistan claims Kahsmir just because it is an Indian Union Territory and nothing else.
@Akarsh2008Kashmiri Muslims and state is Pakistan. You black skinned lindus have nothing common with kashmiris. Soo er or later, you will be vanquished from the IIOJK
If you learn about the meaning of Kashmir and Srinagar and where these name came from you will get your answer that J&K belongs to whom. The owner of J&K acceded his property to India and chapter closed there. No one on this planet can change this fact.
@@Factomedi so by your logic then Palestine should be given to isreal because now there are jews living in majority on that land so now that land should be of jews. Right?
@@Factomedino more than 40k paki troos but somehow 930000 surrendered. Plus you guys didn't flair in the western sector either. 2200 soldiers with 50+ tanks and 200+ armour vehicles losing to 120 soldiers with no heavy armour
it is important to note that 99% of the forces invading kashmir were the pakistani military or its proxy assets so it is clearly an act of aggression by pakistan
"Creation of India & Pakistan..." BS, India is an ancient nation. An ancient civilizational nation and Pakistan, a product of pre-colonial Isl@m!c polity. It is not a nation, as there was never any Pakistani nation. So please get your basic facts correct.
@@IbrahimMalik006 This only shows your ignorance of Indian history. It's and has always been like an octopus. Read about the Chakravartin Emperors of India, the ones who have achieved de-facto unification of India. May be the Greeks, Greco-Roman, Arabs, Chinese,etc. who have written about India the civilizational nation, should have taken classes from on India 😁
@@RR-pc7yv 😁 Thanks for telling me that but, again, India was never the name of a country but rather the whole region was referred to as India even in the middle ages when there were many divided empires in the subcontinent. I suppose you didn't get my point.
@@IbrahimMalik006 Word 'India' itself is 2800 years old and is an exonym not an endonym. It's a civilizational nation. But of course, you won't understand that. As I'm familiar with and well aware of the r@pe of history which you're taught in the name of Pakistan Studies. Everything wuzz Ancient Pakistan Saarr 🤡🤡🤡...😂😂😂 Read about the India and its nationhood which has been described by both the ancient to present period sources of both Indian and foriegn origin. What defines and unites India as a nation is common language(Sanskrit), religion/culture aka Hinduism & its offshoots + other faiths which share or have source in Hinduism, common ruling families,etc. This is like saying there was no Germany or Italy before 1870s. India is a civilization. Just like China. They're in no way comparable to Europe and any Western nation/nation state. Nation states is a post-Napoleonic Wars period concept whose roots are in the treaty of Westphalia of 1630 which paved way for secular(aka less political Christianity) identitarian nationalisms. Yes, there was no nation state back then. Same goes for India too but saying that there was no India or India as a nation never existed, is factually objectively incorrect. It's a continuous evolving civilization. But yes, you guys aren't part of it now. As you yourself have been cut out and have been forced to disown that because of Isl@m and your national narrative. That is for sure 😁
@@IbrahimMalik006 Coming to empires. This is only true for the Isl@m!c aka the foriegn & Indian M0sl!m dynasties and states. But not for the native Indian aka Hindu states and empires. Read about the ideological roots of the Maratha and other 17th-19th century period Hindu/native Indian states, empires and political entities. All of them considered themselves as part of 1 nation aka 1 entity called India/Bharatvarsha/Aryavarta/Jamudvipa. This is what India is.
Currently many citizens of present Pakistan want to be part of India, whole of Pakistani occupied Kashmir if given a fair chance to vote, would vote to be under the rule and law of India.
Two muslim majority states Hyderabad and Junagarh were forcibly merged with India after Indian army showed up on their borders will the threat of invasion. India did the same forcible merging of Kashmir too. That's why Pakistan is never going to drop it's claim for entirety of Kashmir.
Too much watering down of history. 12:11 it was India who went UN for resolution. And referendum had a pre condition of pakistan withdrawing its forces, which never happened.
That is why there are conflicts in South Asia, only because of the British🇬🇧, who reigned for so many years and left these two countries like this. with how nice they can be friends and collaborate together🇵🇰🤝🇮🇳
Britishers always create inter-ethnic tensions intentionally for their surreptitious intensions. When the situation gets off the hands & Britishers failed to reconciliate between them, they leave the region leaving an unstable & uncertain future in the back, such as Kashmir & Palestine. We often accuse India/Pakistan and Israel/Palestine for the crisis, but the real player was UK, doesn't matter were there Cons or Labour govt.
@@Robert-gb1prbefore the British, the Jews were expelled into Europe by Muslims who ''conquered'' the area. Is that a solution? Lets do it to your country then.
Illegally and forcefully Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir is not a part of india it is a disputed territory according to UN resolution between Pakistan and India which India invaded and occupied against the wishes of Kashmiris with 8 00000 terrorist Indian army which myrterd one lakh Kashmiris because kashmiris wanted there right of self-determination according to UN resolution.
I don't understand how both countries with barely a year of independence each, had functional armies. Did the British leave them arms? Did they have enough revenue to purchase weapons in only one year? They had an airforce and a navy as well.
The army British used to control India compromised 90% of Indian soldiers only, in late 1940s they were on brink of rebelling that's why British decided to leave India and the armies comprising of our own people became armies of India and Pakistan
British conquered and controlled India with the help of Indians only. 90-95% of soldiers were Indian. Also, British never had full control over all of India. They didn't even have control over half of India. There were hundreds of princely states and most of them maintained some kind of army by themselves. Not to mention, despite the loot and thievery of Brits, there were hundreds of Indian Maharajas far richer than some of the richest people in the world today (minding inflation).
The British did leave them all the arms. The navy mutinied in 1946 due to lack of payments so London knew that the Indian military will simply not obey the crown anymore.
Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,
India invaded junagarh and Hyderabad so how about India vacate their regions first. Indias claim is so hypocritical we will conquer territories that are Hindu majority that were joining Pakistan but Pakistan can’t do the same 🥴🥴
Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,@@umaryusuf537
Pakistani people's mindsets 1)Alhamdulillah hum musalman hai 2)As a Muslim citizen 3) Musalman hone ke nate 4) Being a Muslim 5) Pakistan main bahot Talent hai 6)Hum ek Azad mulk hain 7) India main musalmano pain bahot zulm hota hai 8) Kashmir Pakistan ka shahrak hai 9) Pakistan main akhliyaton ko puri azadi hain 1 0)India humse jalta hain 1 1)Hum ek Islami Automic takat hain 12)Humare pas zajba Eman hain 13)Humne kalma pada hain 1 4)Hindu Kafir kabhi Musalmano ka dost nahi ban sakta 15) Hum zajbe wali Kom hain 1 6)musalmano ne hinduo pe 1400 sal hukumat ki hain Aloohamdulha Mohd Kai mooh main do do Rasgullah eee😂😂
@@slimmy478-6very good friend thanks you being a pakistani are admiring our gods though i think you are a little illeterate you need to replace 'G' with'j' and it will be fine or else allah ka ballah baja dunga ayesha ka bhi
This doesn’t mention the jammun massacres which occurred shortly before the conflict errupted. The armies of Kashmir began massacring thousands of muslim civilians in the jammun region in an successful attempt to turn the region minority muslim. Its estimated that around 100,000 muslims were killed in these massacres in jammun and the proportion of muslims in the region fell from 60% to 33%. In response, pashtun tribesmen began massacres of Hindus in the areas of jammun under their control, with the proportion of hindus in these regions falling from 10% to less than 1%. This was a large part in why the Pakistani government felt pressured to act and invade the princely state.
What on earth are you talking about. I fail to see the relevance of your frankly incorrect and ahistorical statement to the Kashmir conflict. Regardless, I will debunk your "points". Every religion and people have done violent things in the past, so what? Name me one that hasn't. Saying a bunch of unsourced claims do not help your point in the least. 1.) Indeed, Islam spread to the northern part of the Indian subcontinent through conquest, but so to did Hinduism with the Aryans and later Christianity with the British so I fail to see its relevance. If you are trying to say that it was caused by forced conversions than that is blatantly false, as shown by the fact that after 700 years of Muslim rule only around 70% of the Jammun region was muslim. Compare this to regions where forced conversions actually did take place such as Spain and the Philippines and you immediately see a difference as the persecuted religions of these places quickly faded within a few centuries. Even if forced conversions did take place, that doesn't change the fact that the Muslims there would still be the same indigenous inhabitants of the land so again I fail to see the relevance of your misinformation. If you are genuinely interested in learning about real and unbiased history, here are a few sourced and referenced threads about this topic which should shield some light, although I sincerely do doubt that you will read any of it. Alas, I've done what I can to combat your misinformation, the rest is up to whether or not you are willing to accept factual information from real historians rather than using your pre-conceived notions to make up claims of dubious veracity. www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/2enj7m/lets_talk_about_islam/ www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/ihkfeb/bad_history_of_india_the_mughals_and_especially/ @@JohnAdams-vd5dc
@@JohnAdams-vd5dcLoL you are still living in 9th century ? You hindi speakers have no links with Kashmir. Kashmiris are proud Muslims and Pakistanis 🇵🇰
Imagine how powerful and prosperous a united India could have been. Even if the only chnages were Pakistan and Bangladesh up to Indian SoL and less spendijg on the military would result in tens or hundreds of millions out if poverty, a more stable Afghanistan, a less adventerous China (and one with a stringer rival in Asia) and a wealthier happier world. All that assumes it doesnt descend into sectarian violence and insurgency. The BJP wouldnt be in power andbthr Pakistani military wouldnt orevent denicracy in Pakistan. Man. . .
Absolutely wrong. Partition was a good thing for India. Had it remained United, India would have been extremely weak and divided politically, and always prone to external interferences. I am thankful to Jinnah for partition and thus division of Indian Muslims into three countries.
Absolutely wrong muslims would be the slave of the Hindu majority as we are a MASSIVE population we will never had excepted to be lived as a minority with being separate culture from the hindus
A different perspective from Freedom at midnight! Muslims and Hindus had lived amicably prior to partition! One culprit in all this was Mountbatten a vainglorious selfish Royal ! Bringing forward the partition date with zero planning by an ungrateful country Indian and Pakistani soldiers laid their life for in a battle WW2 not of their making !! Perhaps the Japanese should have taken the subcontinent!
Other than 1971, where the entirety of East Pakistan (modern Bangladesh) was liberated, you wouldn't find much border change in the rest, despite them still being large scale wars. One unique "operation" that did change the map was not a full fledged war (Operation Meghdoot, look it up), where India managed to liberate the entirety of the Siachen Glacier, and it remains the world's highest battle zone up till today.
I wonder why Sardar Patel advised Nehru to not go to UN or even violate UN's decision to take all of J&K as Maharaja had already succeeded his state into India. Was he not alive? He had that kind of thinking and charisma already. Nehru is to blame. Indian army was capable enough.
@@HimanshuShukla-p5c the number of pandits killed since 1947 is less than 1,000. The number of Muslims killed during the Jammu massacres in a single year was 200,000. Why do you think there is still an insurgency in Kashmir valley? They don't want you there.
@@DANGARJOR really dude, the crime on kashmiri pandits have been taking place for more than 500years , it all started with shah mir till aurangzeb what do you have to say for that.
Our Indian 🇮🇳 brothers of GILGIT should get freedom from Pakistan and reunite with Us! Pakistan n China should move out of Indian Territory and stop this decades long Bloodshed!
I've noticed that there's a lot of Pakistanis and Indians with white skin, maybe because they're not mixed with dravidian race, maybe they are true Indo-Aryans and Irano-Aryans
I'm from Gilgit which india considers part of indian occupied Kashmir. We got independence from British backed dogras on 1st November 47 and we fought for it, later joined Pakistan Pakistan crossed into Kashmir on 22 oct.
I think people can have their as life as normal. I think we need a passage to afghanistan freely. Rest should be solved peacefully. We should form a economic block like EU and call it a day. Pakistani should first form a democratic government. We don't even know who to deal with .As government are mostly proxies for army
Do U think that Muhummad Jinnah bhai hatred for Hindus'because his Hindus Parents were Kick out from Hindu community of Gujarat and Convert to Islam out of Compulsion /Frustration etc. Say something about it !
Factually wrong on too many points, it was only when Pakistani Forces were about to surround Srinagar, the King acceded to India that too only for self defence. Pakistanis burnt and tortured subjects of Raja Hari Singh and to save his Kingdom from clutches of those disorderly Pakistanis, Raja Hari Singh acceded to India.
Muslims are a majority in Regions like East Bengal, West Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkwa, Kashmir, Swat valley ! And so only these were made a part of Pakistan except Balochistan & Kashmir ! Balochistan an Independent Nation was invaded & annexed by Jinnah & Kashmir which was Princely State was invaded by Jinnah but the Invaders were pushed back by Indian Forces who came to save Kashmir from the invaders after Maharaja of Kashmir cried for help from India & agreed to Ascend to the Indian Union ! Khyber Pakhtunkwa was made a part of Pakistan through a rigged Referendum ! Balochistan even today is struggling for Independence from Pakistan !
Shut up! It was a Muslim Majority region, and it was decided that areas with muslims majority will be given to Pakistan and those with hindu majority will be given to the Indian state. Kashmir had a Muslim majority, but their leader with hindu. So technically Kashmir belongs to Pakistan if we go in accordance to the British partition deal. BUT their leader Maharaja secretly decided that he'll unify his region to India. So in retaliation the Pakistani tribals fought against him.
Always blaming Muslims for everything bad is not good. It shows how little knowledge you have about the actual happenings, and how much you have speculated yourself to be the case. So people like you are just jerks who nobody even listens to. Cuz its like wastage of time to argue with an illiterate person.
It was not a part of British India, it was left to choose. You violated that choice by invading Kashmir. Abd about it being a Muslim majority region, Umberkot, Karachi and Lahore were Hindu Sikh majority but were given to you. Will you talk about that? Pakistan is not a representative of subcontinental Muslims, it butchered over 3 million people in Bengal alone, a good reason is there to assume that most were Muslims. @@TacticalWolf145
@@TacticalWolf145the British partition deal didn't involve Muslim majority regions being part of Pakistan. It simply allowed different provinces and princely states to remain autonomous or choose to acceede to either country.
Freedom for Kashmir from Pakistan Pakistan did bad in Mirpur District of Kashmir and whole world should watch it... Also, Watch, what happened in baramullah too
Nice job considering the northern west is Muslim majority. You think India will take in another Northern West which was majority is Muslim A word don't the whole region otherwise it another powder keg like the Balkan. Partition is better.
@thanhhoangnguyen4754 I don't think so conquering lands is fun so we shall be doing that it's fun freeing people from their mortal coils and then living their land you know just another territory added into the republic
Kashmir was only a small region within the princely state. Princely state also included parts like Ladakh, Jammu & Aksai Chin which were Hindu/Buddhist majority. The princely state overall was Hindu/Buddhist majority
@@indiafirst3676 stop lying you can google it. In the 1901 Census of the British Indian Empire, the population of the princely state of Kashmir and Jammu was 2,905,578. Of these, 2,154,695 (74.16%) were Muslims, 689,073 (23.72%) Hindus, 25,828 (0.89%) Sikhs, and 35,047 (1.21%) Buddhists (implying 935 (0.032%) others).
@@indiafirst3676lol are you really that dumb. Kashmir had a clear Muslim majority. Plus Muslims were driven out of jammu by Hari Singh which also had a Muslim majority.
Only if the British general of Pakistan corpse followed Jinnah's orders, the entire Kashmir would have been liberated before Nehru ran to the UN for conducting a ceasefire.
If it was so then why Pakistani Army made no territorial gains in Kashmir ever since even though multiple wars were fought later. Pakistani day dreaming
lol it was a British general who was heading the gilgit scouts which led to the capture of now occupied Gilgit-Baltistan know your facts; Nehru was arm twisted by Mountbatten then governor general and head of Indian armed forces to look for other means to settle the conflict as he refused to authorize further military actions the reason for this being the U.K had to secure it's "brass neck" by sending a message to the world that the transfer of power is as "peaceful " as possible.
Today's pakistani occupied kashmir has been taken by war... Indian occupied kashmir was not taken by war, it was gifted to them by the king... Pakistan lost more casualties then india but Pakistan didn't ran towards UN.. it was India then running away...
Who was there before the British....who was there before that....who was there before that....and before that....and before that....? The world has been a swirling pot of wars and conquest from the start...
@bryant-fr7sr The entirety of the subcontinent has been under complete and total warfare long, long before colonial powers came around... tribal and clan warfare and extreme brutality is well documented... check it out.
Even without colonialism, based of what happened in other parts of the world, the muslim population and hindu population would have fight each other many times until they reached a settlement (if any) . While I don't endorse colonialism, the wars were most likely inevitable. In my opinion, there was no easy solution. A unified India would have most likely lead eventually to a revolt of muslim communities and even more fighting and death. War was inevitable is Indian subcontinent ...
to be cleaar the gilgit scouts has noting to do with local gilgit people its entirely operated by a british who made secreat deal with pakistan as he was supported by then british gov to cutoff indias direct access to central asia as you can see geopolitcs also playing its role here and the victim was india and still is ....
@prestallar4339 😂 even if it's true they never wanted to be separated it's only there general who was British somehow woke up in the morning and decided gilgits are not happy with india that's the irony
@prestallar4339 have u conducted a consus during that time lol , the way gilgits revolting against Pakistan this days it's clear indication that they didn't wanted it it was forced on them
Good thing you shared both perspectives to this war. However I have an issue with how you say "He was also called Maharaja" Sir Maharaja means king. He was a king not called a king like some nick name.
To be fair, they were only united because of the British conquering them in the first place. Besides them, only the Mauryans, Tughluqs and Mughals succeeded. The rest of history shows the land being a patchwork of different competing states.
@shortentertainment93 Not really, Chalukyas ruled mostly in the deccan, The entire south was free from the Gupta's and the Marathas at their Greatest extent didn't even have South India, Bengal and some of the western areas like Punjab.
i dont exactly knoow but i ll try to tell what happend in simple words so in jammu and kashmir there was muslinm majority but the king mahraja hari singh was hindu and wanted to join india but the muslim majority fought against this decision and managed to liberate some areas which are now part of pakistan
Now lemme tell you the true story Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India 2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale, 3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending C.) India was always the biggest regional power D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir, India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India, your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir) The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis! Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,
Kashmir belonged to Pakistan 🇵🇰. The state was overwhelmingly muslim. India invaded the Hyderabad & Junagadh muslim states based on the fact that the population of these 2 states was hindu. Pakistan had the similar right to oust hindu raja from the state. Sooner or later, Kashmir will be reunited with Pakistan.
If Britisher just wanted to leave and didn't have any intention to divide then why were sri lanka, mayanmar and Maldives devided from India there were no religious reasons there neither was someone demanding a separate state for them. The real reason why the partition was rushed 1 year is not because of unstability in India, no no no It was because they ( British ) had intelligence that Mohammed ali jinah had T.B .
@@Gamer72-12 pls Fact chechk yourself. British did have Sri Lanka. They called it Ceylon. It got independence in 1948 and British deliberately gave it independence a year later so that it won't merge with India.
Country called India came into existence only because of British. Sri Lanka wasn't a part of British Raj. Sri Lanka was a separate colony called British Ceylon. Even before British colonization, Sri Lanka was independent. It was ruled by Sinhalese kingdoms since 543 BCE. Sri Lanka has no reason to merge with India. It's same for Myanmar. Myanmar was ruled by Burmese and Mon empires. Myanmar was connected with India by British. But later, They created a separate colony called British Burma. Also Myanmar won't like to lose their thousands years sovereignity by becoming a part of India. Also Sri Lanka and Myanmar are Buddhists. So, They are religiously different from India. Also They are ethnically different from India.
@@worlddata8982 India was a name given to India by tye Greeks not the British. We Indians have always considered the enture Indian subcontinent as our civilization. We called our civilization Bharat. Even before British colonized India the Maratha emipre had a claim on all of India including Sri lanka and for God 's sake literally it's name Sri Lanka is given to them by us. They are our part from Ramayan, actually as per new evidence that might be the place where our civilization actually started. There empires were also Indian empires like there are Indian empires in any other region but if we talk about Indian empires of mainland India that ruled Sri Lanka they were ruled by The chola empire till 1070 CE. Later they were also the vassal of the great Vijayanagar empire. Nonetheless it doesn't matter whatever is part of our civilization is part of our civilization. If you are talking about religion then you should Hindus also worship Gautam Buddha. Bhodh panth is part of Sanatana Dharma or Dharma. Buddha was a Indian and we during Ashok's time gave Lanka and Mayanmar Buddhism ☸ .
@12:14 there are over one million Indian troops stationed in Jammu & Kashmir. I spent 6 months in Srinagar and surrounding areas, I saw how horrible they treat the locals. I have videos on my page about it.
@@LgbtIsAConspiracy Not necesarily. Just saying what indian army doing is necessary for its national security, but USA like to do some extra, war is like video game for them. Tbh i wouldn't go to judge them but if some random "US Keyboard force" soldier come to judge us, cant help but point towards their own dirty a**.
@@LgbtIsAConspiracy bro what they do with kasmiri pandit They are the one living there before any muslim was born What isi do with them error all people and some who save their life are exodus in their own country What happened to 25% hindu sikha Christian Buddhist Same thing with the people of kasmiri The head of jama masjid is error because he supports india By isi and support of cia
3:39 and to this day that territory pictured there seems to be contested by china and india and pakistan, and historically was also contested by greece and persia if i recall and not sure if any of the asian steppe nomadic tribes raided it or claimed it or not, not to mention both britain and russia probably wanted it during their "great game" shenanigans.
Free Kashmir from Pakistan. I’ve seen massive protests in the past few months from Giljit Balistan who wants nothing from Pakistan. Free Balochistan as Pakistan illegally and forcefully took their state. Free Sindh as Sindhis don’t want to be part of Pakistan Finally Free Punjab from Pakistan😌😌😌😌😌😌😌
@@AbhinandanABS Even though many of the terror attacks have been only blamed to Pakistan by India but there are still terror attacks which India did too.
Your saying that the British just wanted to go from india is not true ,THE so called British wanted to split india up as much they could before going and that's the truth so Queen Victoria had said if we meening the British loss india split it up as much u can otherwise this country will become very strong all uk has done this all over the world to rule and know usa nato and uk and some western countries are trying the some thing with russia and that's the truth.
Great video but it was important to mention that five days before Pakistani troops entered Kashmir, the Maharaja state forces initiated a large scale genocide in Jammu killing over 200K Muslims and reducing this majority to a minority population. Indians keep living in this delusion where they reject the ruler’s jurisdiction in the case of Junagdh (Muslim ruler wanted to accede to Pakistan with Hindu majority) but happily seem to accept jurisdiction over Muslim Kashmir just because the ruler acceded to India.
@@prateeksharma6706india didn’t take 66% of Kashmir the maharaja Joined india so Indian troops just walked in. Today india controls around 45% of Kashmir only
@@umaryusuf537 nope indian army pushed paki army back from poonch baramullah leh and shrinagar effectively comtrolling 66% or 2/3rd of kashmir by land 80% by population
Not A good video a lot of details not included the Troubles in Poonch dates back to 19th century and is complex to understand First Kashmir War involved battles in highest terrain like in Skardu, Operation Gulmarg and the 5 day plan to take Srinagar the capital seems deliberately ignored, The Massacres at the Cities like Baramulla, Kotli, Mirpur etc are not included in the video, The Rebellion of the Muslim troops in The Maharaja's Army namely the Gilgit Scouts which helped Pakistan to gain cities like Gilgit easily during the initial days and THE BRITISH ROLE IN THE WAR are missing which can make audience learn better about conflict. Disliking the video Hope that you read and respond AND take criticism in positive manner
Do you think this war could have been avoided?
♦The best way to support our work is by becoming a member, here on UA-cam or on Patreon:
ua-cam.com/users/Knowledgiajoin
www.patreon.com/Knowledgia
♦By doing so you will be able to watch our videos FIRST and with No Ads. And you will support us a lot, as any dollar helps immensely in our production process. Thank you for your consideration!
Do some Proper Research before making Misleading Videos, Don't make Terrorists Heroes 😒😒😒
Please make a video The Holocaust in Romania and Transnistria conflict.
Difficult but not impossible.
well the war should have been. avoided by giving the people a refferendum. Let the people choose. The people of Kashmir and Jammu have the right
@@Smiling-Monk Hindu Maharaja(who was imposed by British not local): KIlls tens of thousands of Muslims atleast
Muslims: Rebel
India: oH LOOk aT ThE tErroRIsTsss
I'm sure these comments are going to be full of respectful and well articulated moderate perspectives.
India and Pakistan have been fighting over an unredeemed Google Play gift card for decades...
😂😂😂
Nowadays everyone has learnt the secret trick to get views. Make videos on India.
@@parthkhanolkar7916 Fucking True
@@parthkhanolkar7916 to be fair, Knowlediga has been doing videos from around the world for a while
As a Pakistani, thank you for making a neutral perspective of the war. A lot of both Indians and Pakistanis in this comment section should realise that history is something that should not be tampered with due to their political and personal beliefs.
@Dfttgh your comment accomplished nothing and means nothing please delete to not embarrass yourself further
@Dfttgh Israel was built over the locals
Pakistan was built over their own people
Easy?
@@SheksgemWhepdoand what makes Pakistan not an occupation???
India and Palestine both were the British colonies, while Israel and Pakistan both were created by the colonizers, creation of both these lead to chaos, migrations and unrest, just coz Pakistan( and Bangladesh) is a muslim nation and it's suits your agenda thus you gonna reveal your double standards??? Huh???
what is your defination of an occupation wouldn't change the narravative of what you want to portray,
We have seen what Syrians had did with the Yazidis or better what Pakistani had themsleves did with the native Hindus and Sikhs of Pakistani occupied Punjab or Hindus of east Bengal(Bangladesh) during the Indo-Pakistani war of 1971, so better don't act that as if you really care about the DNA ancestry and all,
Pakistan is an occupation since it was made on the land of Hindus, creation of Pakistan lead to choas, unrest and unwanted migrations, 14th Augast is an establishment day of Pakistan( and Bangladesh), or we can say that an independence day of Pakistan from India
😂@@SheksgemWhepdo
इस्लाम सिंधु क्षेत्र के लिए अभिशाप है
आप सब अभी भी कैसे मूर्ख बने हुए हैं
@@__Trident ठंडी?
As a Pakistani, this gave me much more information about the first Indo-Pakistani War. This is an amazing video btw
I feel sad for those Indians and Pakistani's that died in this war.
I would love to see a video of the other Indo-Pakistani wars. Great vid!
Bro our govs are fking us up
Hope our gen will treat each other like lost brothers not enemies
Nah bro i can assure you that won't happen for atleast 80 years@@sourabhsingh5051
@@sourabhsingh5051 Never happening. There's no reason for Pakistan (or Pakistani army to be more precise) to even exist if they don't keep up the narrative that India is an enemy (which we're not, in principle).
Peace between India and Pakistan is IMPOSSIBLE. It may happen if someday Pakistan balkanizes or somehow the Army goes out of power (very unlikely).
@@Argdut1106 "india's not the enemy" having nearly most of disputes among the neighbors still "india is not the enemy".
@@Argdut1106 Pakistan's regions would still be Muslim majority even if Pakistan balkanizes,which has less chances than the balkanization of India, which had more separatist movements in Kashmir,Indian Panjab,North-East, and the Sikh freedom movements. The feeling will always remain for those living in borders of today's Pakistan because the population would be Muslims
Great vid! Its very hard to make an unbiased vid on this issue, but you did very well to look at both the perspectives. Love it!
People of Jammu and Kashmir should be given right to choose their side
what a stupid comment
id rather see kashmir free from india and pakistan than we owning entirety of kashmir by wars or india owning entire kashmir by wars
Duriing Partition Public votes in the favour of Pakistan & Pakistan is asking for refrendum since 1958. Partition was based on religion & both decided that we will take land in which there is our religious majority & kashmir was Muslim majority but the leadr of kashmir was British puppet who deny to give Pakistan rights & created a conflict. Which is in favour of British.
Kashmir was, is, will always be a part of India whatever the green pigs do
Minority Hindus persecuted by Pakistanis should be allowed to settle down in J&K. Maharaja Hari Singh has agreed & signed to join India. It's time for the development of J&K.
Finally, a modern war. Thanks Knowledgia.
Battkes won by India during the first Kashmir war
Battle of Shelatang (7 November 1947) - A decisive battle where Indian forces halted the advance of tribal invaders towards Srinagar.
Battle of Shalateng (7 November 1947) - Often cited along with Shelatang, it was a significant engagement where Indian forces launched a counter-offensive to secure Srinagar.
Battle of Badgam (3 November 1947) - Indian forces engaged the tribal invaders, which included the famous actions of Major Somnath Sharma, who was posthumously awarded the Param Vir Chakra.
Battle of Zoji La (1 November 1948) - Indian forces used tanks at high altitudes for the first time to push back Pakistani forces and secure the pass.
Operation Bison (13-15 November 1948) - An operation that led to the capture of Dras, Kargil, and ultimately, Leh.
Battle of Naushera (January-February 1948) - A series of engagements to defend the strategic town of Naushera.
Battle of Jhangar (December 1947 - February 1948) - Key battles around the town of Jhangar, with Indian forces initially losing and then recapturing the town.
Battle of Tithwal (May 1948) - Indian forces recaptured the Tithwal region from Pakistani forces.
Battle of Poonch (November 1947 - November 1948) - A prolonged siege where Indian forces successfully defended Poonch and eventually lifted the siege.
Battle of Rajouri (April 1948) - Indian forces liberated Rajouri from Pakistani invaders.
War won 1947-48 Pakistan 1 India 0
@@waytogo11 Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India
2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale,
3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz
A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah
B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending
C.) India was always the biggest regional power
D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir,
India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India,
your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless
And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir)
The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis!
Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,
Mulla spotted opinion rejected @@waytogo11
British drawing border , what could go wrong
Same with Israel-Palestine border. What went wrong?
I wonder
@@shahanshahpolonium you got banned from beluga server? Lol
@@jackpot940 nolol
@@shahanshahpolonium they actually banned me and not taking my request lol
Jammu and Kashmir situation is even more complicated because of Chinese invasion (surprisingly no mention in the video)
That is in Ladakh and a border demarcation issue. Not the issue of the possession of whole chunk of a region. Nor a legacy issue.
Chinese annexation of Aksai Hind is not likely a religious agenda, it's more like theirs historical agenda
@@satyasankalpapanigrahi9416为何你直接说阿克塞钦是你们的，我看了维基百科对于阿克塞钦的介绍，从法理上明显更倾向是中国
@@护花铃 Aksai Chin was not yours after the fall of QING Dynasty. It ended at that time the taipinh Rebellion and other anti-imperialistic uprisings against Qing. The Sikhs invaded along with the British Raj forces captured the Aksai Chin and renamed into Aksai Hind.
Can't you type your comment and reply in English instead of typing in mandarin. I can't understand your Han chinese mandarin writings. Next replies write in English
@@satyasankalpapanigrahi9416清朝灭忙后，阿克塞钦就不是我们得了？这是什么逻辑？印度从英国摆脱殖民后，那印度很多领土是不是就不是印度得了。政权的更替不影响领土得变更，这是国际法的常识。按照你的逻辑，你们印度摆脱英国殖民得时候，我们去入侵你们的领土，那领土是不是就应当属于我们了？你们印度人都什么思考逻辑？至于回复，不好意思，我英文不太好
Goa was not a British colony , it was a Portugues colony, your map is wrong
I think nobody would notice that as a big deal, since the point of interest is in Kashmir, also, it would be really distracting to the audience as the important parts of the story is north, not south west.
Who cares grow up😂
Oy lil kid get a life@@AaronTheGreat________
@@AaronTheGreat________Duriing Partition Public votes in the favour of Pakistan & Pakistan is asking for refrendum since 1958. Partition was based on religion & both decided that we will take land in which there is our religious majority & kashmir was Muslim majority but the leadr of kashmir was British puppet who deny to give Pakistan rights & created a conflict. Which is in favour of British.
So as j&k Because J&K was also never a part of British India
Would love to see a documentary on the 1965 Indo-Pak War
Yeah, On 65,When Paxtan failed to Capture initial goal of Kashmir, In 71, When India SLASHED and Destroyed Paxtan into 2 and Took 90,000+ Paxtani Troops who surrendered to India in what is called the Largest Surrender since WW 2, In 83, India Captured Siachen,in 99 India destroyed Paxtani regulars in Kargil etc Just look at the Size of the Economies, India's Per Capita used to be 50% of Paxtan in 1990,Today India's Per Capita in 200% of Paxtan, India is a Rising Global Technological, Military, Industrial Financial and Economic Power
@@wisdomhighschool9975Why are you copy pasting the same paragraph again and again?
@@IbrahimMalik006 Maybe he desperately wants to see it 😂
it was Pakistan who declared war on India in order annexe regions like Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan choose to go on war with India in 1965 because at that time the US had given Pakistan advanced weapons and jets giving Pak army and airforce an edge
But even after all this, Pakistan failed to achieve its objectives and was forced to agree for the ceasefire
Both India and Pakistan claim victory for the 1965 war, but it's considered as an Indian victory as India successfully defended against Pakistani attacks and also captured Lahore during the counter offensive while Pakistan failed to achieve its goals and also faced more loss and casualties compared to India
@@darthvader5558 I suppose strategic miscalculations by both India and Pakistan ensured that the war ended in a stalemate. I am not in any offence to India rather I just want to continue to accept our history and redefine the atmosphere of hatred created by both side's establishment since the Partition plan.
The real "Kashmir" region (Kashmir Valley or the Jhelum River Valley) was at war in the first war for a very short period. Most of the war was in the Jammu division (Jhangar, Poonch, Rajouri, Mirpur, Kotli, etc.). In the Kashmir Division, only the Western region (Baramulla, Gulmarg, Sopore) came under Pakistani occupation before being pushed back, even out of Uri.
While India could have liverated further up till Muzaffarabad, it was decided that the troops guarding the Kashmir division should instead be diverted south to end the Siege of Poonch.
As for the Trans Himalayan theatre (Gilgit, Skardu, Kargil and Leh), you didnt mention that there was direct British intervention and support towards the Pakistani side in the Rebellion of the Gilgit Scouts. The British did not want India to have a direct land border with Afghanistan and hence, the Soviet Union.
One of the greatest moments of this war was towards the end, when a group of scouts left the Indian Himalayan town of Manali in search of a path through uncharted Himalayas towards the Buddhist city of Leh trying to survive the Pakistani siege. The expedition to find a path to Leh was so successful that the Leh-Manali highway is still used to this day to reach Leh and Kargil without going through Kashmir Valley.
Subsequently, this was also the very first war where tanks were used in high altitude and worked, in pushing the Pakistanis out of Drass, Kargil and Leh, but sadly could not reach Skardu before the ceasefire.
Forgot to mention, many parts of Jammu and Kashmir, like South Kashmir (Anantnag, Avantipora, Verinag, Qazigund, Pahalgam) , Jammu city, and northern and eastern parts of Jammu division like Ramban, Udhampur, Doda, Reasi and Kishtwar had never been part of any war.
The indian military couldn't because they couldn't spread and refoce their allies due the indian military had to defend and push back other pakistani forces. @xijinpig8982
I am From Kotli, Azad Kashmir. Thank god for Jinnahs sacrifices 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
@@osmanamjid2432😂
@@osmanamjid2432
No problem. I hope you are enjoying your beggar lifestyle there. I increasingly notice that your people are all over in other countries trying to escape the horrible situation in Pakistan. I can only congratulate you, and I don't judge you. Hope your loyalty to a country that can't hold a free and fair election and has never had an elected PM complete their full term pays off 😊
Well done knowledgia for the unbiased video!!!
My grandfather fought in this war , was captured by indians, but escaped with other prisoners
I would expect to see this comment from like a 76 year old American grandpa from Wyoming 😂
@Akarsh2008 He moved to the uk , worked there in factories in 60s, 70s, then retired in the 80s , lived his last two decades on pension , with his all family, till his death.
@Akarsh2008 well my origins is from azad kashmir. Not mirpuri
Soon East Punjab became khalistan and India cut off from illegally Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir and Kashmir merged with Pakistan inshAllah and Kashmir issue solved forever InshAllah.
First stop begging for $5 billion loan from IMF
Thanks for making video on this topic
Amazing documentry🎉
Just one small inaccuracy. Kashmir acceded to India after Pakistan began it's invasion and the gilgit scouts had defected
Kashmir did not acceded to Bharat🇮🇳
It was non Kashmiri King of Kashmir appointed by British who acceded to Bharat
@@usmanqureshi08 by extending your logic, nehru and jinnah were also British appointees
Hyderabad acceded to Pakistan and India began its invasion of Hyderabad in Operation Polo, where 40,000 Muslims were killed.
@@intellectualcucumber looking at 1948 Hyderabad's geography and demographics, it would have acceded to India sooner or later, probably with much more violence
@@shahanshahpolonium true, but Operation Polo showed India's hypocrisy in Kashmir.
The British🇬🇧 take responsibility for strange borders
Indeed it was planned to prevent india land to border soviet influenced Afghanistan.
Revolt in Baltistan Scouts was led by british Major 😒😒 h
American borders 🤡
British borders 🗿
The background 🏜💥💣🌵
I am from poonch region and the Pakistani version of maharaja being a tyrant is absolutely true . 17 people/fighters of my village gave up their lives fighting the dogra army. Our war has nothing to do with India to begin with . We just wanted freedom from tyranny and a large number of our people being world war veterans helped
Lahore and Karachi were also part of India. British backstabbing is leading to loss of territory even today for India.
And RSS backstabbed India by assassinating Gandhi
@Akarsh2008not because of neighbouring villages.. it was because west Pakistan didn't have a major port.. since Kolkata was given to india despite much demands from Muslim league the Britishers chose to give Karachi as compensation
@Akarsh2008Going by this logic, there were many Muslim majority areas in UP, CP & South so should have they gone to Pakistan?? British only advocated for division of Punjab & Bengal.
😂
What Tamils or Beharis have to do with Lahore or Krachi ?
@Vaidehi2002hey,are you from Pakistan 😮
At 6:24 in the video it states what "exactly happened isn't known" - that's because the people it happened to, haven't been asked. Imagine trying to document the holocaust without the survivors stories?! My grandparents are from the region and they experienced what happened. Hundreds of thousands like them survived to tell the tale of what happened to our people.
The Maharaja was a tyrant - he was disliked by the population of the region, especially the Muslim majority because of his anti Muslim policies, alongside the high taxes, deliberately aimed to drive away the poor rural population. Our grandparents often talked about how they were told of better times during the Sikh Empire, especially the rule of Ranjeet Singh, who had controlled parts of Jammu and Kashmir as part of his empire.
When the Maharaja's forces went to disarm the muslims, it was not limited to poonch, it was wide spread in Muslim regions of Jammu and Kashmir. They even took farming tools and axes so people couldn't use them to resist. Following that right wing hindu mobs alongside the maharaja's forces burned, looted, killed and raped their way through the villages of Jammu and Kashmir, in a progrom similar to what has happened to the Rohingya of Myanmar. This caused hundreds of thousands of refugees and started the military conflict - where the Kashmiri tribes and Pukhtun tribes joined.
For the upcoming war in comment section.
Good Luck
😂
Just want an opinion, wasn't this area former (Sub-continent) better off as One ?
@@rockyetchison3380bro is already trying to start a war 💀
@@rockyetchison3380 It would have exploded into civil war,which would have been more harmful as it would involve civilian wars too
@@rockyetchison3380 that's debatable. But I think as an Indian partition was a necessary evil. Radical islam can not be accomodated in any democracy.
Oh a video explaining the indo-pak war... Im sure the comment will be respectful to each other!
The power to decide whether to remain independent / chose between India and Pakistan was under the British Parliament's Lapse of Paramountcy Act was given to the Ruler and not to the public. Pakistan should have challenged this Act in the House of Lords - Gilgit , Hunza , Baltistan , Mirpur , Muzzafarabad and also Chitral were parts of erstwhile Riyasat of Jammu and Kashmir which, in 1947 , legally acceded, in its entirety to India. Riyasats like Jammu and Kashmir , Kalat , Bahawalpur , Umerkot etc were covered under the Lapse of Paramountcy Act of British Parliament. We cannot be selective. Pakistan has absolutely no claim ,whether legal or moral , on even an inch sq of territory of the erstwhile Riyasat of Jammu and Kashm ................................................................................................................
Can you make a video on the other indo-pak wars you explained this one really well not many people have a detailed video about them like you do
Yep, definitely we need that, I need TO learn Indian history and having a neutral and great video explaining that could be useful for knowledge hungry students like me.
Bro how do you make these videos, maps animation, voice editting, video editting, etc.
Please tell me.
how is this information relevant??? you keep exploring truth.......Bro🤣
Kashmir always belonged to India
Inhabitants are muslims.
@@LordRyanOfYork
Forceably converted
@@artram1655 why i should believe ur words? Let the people of kashmir decide by vote.
Muslim still saaar 😂😂😂@@artram1655
@LordRyanOfYork I'm from kashmir and I don't want to be part of 👨🏿🇮🇳
India 🇮🇳 has much more legitimacy over Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh as:
1) Historically J&K and Ladakh have been parts of Indian empires such as Mauryas and Sikhs. Ladakh is a Buddhist majority area of India just like Sikkim or Arunachal. If they join China/Pakistan, their rights will be taken just like Tibet.
2) The King of Jammu & Kashmir signed an instrument to join India. It was later Pakistan who got angry and started terr○rising Jammu & Kashmir. Before the King's decision of joining India, Pakistan did not even care about Kashmir.
3) There are many important Temples like Vaishno Devi & Amarnath Temple in Kashmir. They are extremely sacred for Hindus. Meanwhile there is no reason for Pakistan to go to Kashmir.
4) If you look at Jammu & Kashmir and the Pakistani illegally occupied part of Kashmir today, there is a huge difference. Jammu & Kashmir is one of most visited tourist regions of India. Meanwhile nobody goes to Pakistan illegally occupied Kashmir.
5) In Kashmir India has hosted G20 Meeting, will host Miss World in few days, will post International Automobile Expo, has already hosted many international seminars and much more. On other hand Pakistan illegally occupied Kashmir has hosted terr○r groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba, Hizbul and Jaish-e-Muhammad.
6) India built world's highest rail bridge in Jammu & Kashmir. India built Asia's longest tunnel in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. India built first class infrastructure especially in Lal Chowk, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir. On other hand, people of Pakistan illegally occupied Kashmir don't even have flour to eat.
7) Most important of all: Kashmir is named after a Hindu sage named Kashyap, who lived in that area. "Mir" means lake. The region has a lake named after sage Kashyap. Thus "KashMir." Pakistan claims Kahsmir just because it is an Indian Union Territory and nothing else.
@@harlowida you are not Kashmiri, you are Pakistani. Speak up the truth.
@@d02vgood way to divert attention
@Akarsh2008Kashmiri Muslims and state is Pakistan. You black skinned lindus have nothing common with kashmiris. Soo er or later, you will be vanquished from the IIOJK
Kashmir has been Muslim majority since 15th century. The state belonged to Pakistan & shall be reunited with us in near future. 🇵🇰
Aren't you ashamed of invading someone's country and calling this land is your? What's lack in middle East ? @@Sam-wt1cx
Please make a video about The Holocaust in Romania and Transnistria conflict.
If you learn about the meaning of Kashmir and Srinagar and where these name came from you will get your answer that J&K belongs to whom. The owner of J&K acceded his property to India and chapter closed there. No one on this planet can change this fact.
Only kashmiri people have the right to decide their future.
If not, then give junagarh to Pakistan
@@Factomedi so by your logic then Palestine should be given to isreal because now there are jews living in majority on that land so now that land should be of jews. Right?
@@Factomedi junagarh tere pyo da ey
@@Factomediif you want junagadh then give back entire Pakistan
@@ਗੁਰਸਿਮਰਸਿੰਘ say in English, Hindi or Urdu, I don't understand you
I am from Pakistan. Waiting for Part 2
Want a video about the Independence of Bangladesh🇧🇩 ❤
You should thank Sam Manekshaw for that.
@Akarsh2008there were no more than 40k soldiers from the Pakistan side. Don't lie here
@@Factomedino more than 40k paki troos but somehow 930000 surrendered.
Plus you guys didn't flair in the western sector either.
2200 soldiers with 50+ tanks and 200+ armour vehicles losing to 120 soldiers with no heavy armour
@Akarsh2008Shut up 👆
@@Factomedi 90k soldiers surrendered😂
it is important to note that 99% of the forces invading kashmir were the pakistani military or its proxy assets so it is clearly an act of aggression by pakistan
Bla Bla Bla
Bla bla bla
it mainly included tribal forces of waziristan who considered it as a jihad
Aggression my a$$ lmfao
@@randomtanker4355 so initiating international kinetic violence isn’t aggression according to you? Lmfao
Very well made unbiased video, 🤳
Love your videos Knowledgia 🔥💯🔥
Thank you 🙏
Thanks! Enjoy!
@@Knowledgia ⭐💫⭐
"Creation of India & Pakistan..."
BS, India is an ancient nation. An ancient civilizational nation and Pakistan, a product of pre-colonial Isl@m!c polity. It is not a nation, as there was never any Pakistani nation. So please get your basic facts correct.
India was never the name of a nation and was only referred to as a region.
@@IbrahimMalik006 This only shows your ignorance of Indian history. It's and has always been like an octopus. Read about the Chakravartin Emperors of India, the ones who have achieved de-facto unification of India. May be the Greeks, Greco-Roman, Arabs, Chinese,etc. who have written about India the civilizational nation, should have taken classes from on India 😁
@@RR-pc7yv 😁 Thanks for telling me that but, again, India was never the name of a country but rather the whole region was referred to as India even in the middle ages when there were many divided empires in the subcontinent. I suppose you didn't get my point.
@@IbrahimMalik006 Word 'India' itself is 2800 years old and is an exonym not an endonym. It's a civilizational nation. But of course, you won't understand that. As I'm familiar with and well aware of the r@pe of history which you're taught in the name of Pakistan Studies. Everything wuzz Ancient Pakistan Saarr 🤡🤡🤡...😂😂😂
Read about the India and its nationhood which has been described by both the ancient to present period sources of both Indian and foriegn origin. What defines and unites India as a nation is common language(Sanskrit), religion/culture aka Hinduism & its offshoots + other faiths which share or have source in Hinduism, common ruling families,etc. This is like saying there was no Germany or Italy before 1870s. India is a civilization. Just like China. They're in no way comparable to Europe and any Western nation/nation state.
Nation states is a post-Napoleonic Wars period concept whose roots are in the treaty of Westphalia of 1630 which paved way for secular(aka less political Christianity) identitarian nationalisms.
Yes, there was no nation state back then. Same goes for India too but saying that there was no India or India as a nation never existed, is factually objectively incorrect. It's a continuous evolving civilization.
But yes, you guys aren't part of it now. As you yourself have been cut out and have been forced to disown that because of Isl@m and your national narrative. That is for sure 😁
@@IbrahimMalik006 Coming to empires. This is only true for the Isl@m!c aka the foriegn & Indian M0sl!m dynasties and states. But not for the native Indian aka Hindu states and empires. Read about the ideological roots of the Maratha and other 17th-19th century period Hindu/native Indian states, empires and political entities. All of them considered themselves as part of 1 nation aka 1 entity called India/Bharatvarsha/Aryavarta/Jamudvipa. This is what India is.
Kashmir always the part of India 🇮🇳🤟
Says pakistani child 😂😂😂.
Currently many citizens of present Pakistan want to be part of India, whole of Pakistani occupied Kashmir if given a fair chance to vote, would vote to be under the rule and law of India.
No we don't 😂😂😂jeet thinks we want to be associated with him and his people 😂😂😂😂
Two muslim majority states Hyderabad and Junagarh were forcibly merged with India after Indian army showed up on their borders will the threat of invasion. India did the same forcible merging of Kashmir too. That's why Pakistan is never going to drop it's claim for entirety of Kashmir.
Yes cause all of them are parts of indian civilisation thus part of India
@@prateeksharma6706??
Hyderabad was Muslim ruled not Muslim majority and most of the populace hated the rulers for killing Hindus
@waqarsaleem8611, Right!🇵🇰❣️✌️
Junagarh and Hyderabad were hindu majority and yes they always belonged to India just like Kashmir belongs to India.
Too much watering down of history.
12:11 it was India who went UN for resolution. And referendum had a pre condition of pakistan withdrawing its forces, which never happened.
That is why there are conflicts in South Asia, only because of the British🇬🇧, who reigned for so many years and left these two countries like this.
with how nice they can be friends and collaborate together🇵🇰🤝🇮🇳
No, Islamic invaders did not leave India the same as Britthe ishers did.
@@Amanyadav-yn6tb Welcome to a useless point being made. This is the typical Indian brainwashed mindset.
@@Amanyadav-yn6tbLOL india always get invaded even before islam hephtalites, scythians, kushan and others invaded it
British took advantage of the ethnical tensions everywhere they went. There were not peace in India when they arrived.
*Indian Subcontinent. Not South
South Asia. It's a sham and meaningless term.
Odd that the british didn't resolve as both were dominions of the british
as per series you will Publish the video of Bangladeshi Liberatuion War.
Why are there two Hyderabads on the map?
Cause they are two actually, like
Punjab (Indian and other side)
2 different cities but the same name.
Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
@@silentbyte196 thanks!
@@oliverhughes610THERE AEW TWO HYDERABAD . ONE IN INDIA AND ONE IN PAKISTAN
Britishers always create inter-ethnic tensions intentionally for their surreptitious intensions. When the situation gets off the hands & Britishers failed to reconciliate between them, they leave the region leaving an unstable & uncertain future in the back, such as Kashmir & Palestine. We often accuse India/Pakistan and Israel/Palestine for the crisis, but the real player was UK, doesn't matter were there Cons or Labour govt.
My point exactly. Everyone says either Palestine is bad or Israel is bad when in actuality its the British who started these modern day conflicts
@@Robert-gb1prIf you think that the conflicts in Israel started with the British, then you must have no idea about the history of the area.
@@giokun100 i pretty much know the history of the area im just saying the British are partly responsible for that conflict
@@Robert-gb1prbefore the British, the Jews were expelled into Europe by Muslims who ''conquered'' the area. Is that a solution? Lets do it to your country then.
@@Robert-gb1prfirst you say the British started the conflicts then you say they were partially responsible, which one is it?
A video on why Myanmar is not part of India today please.
Illegally and forcefully Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir is not a part of india it is a disputed territory according to UN resolution between Pakistan and India which India invaded and occupied against the wishes of Kashmiris with 8 00000 terrorist Indian army which myrterd one lakh Kashmiris because kashmiris wanted there right of self-determination according to UN resolution.
Quite an interesting video!
I don't understand how both countries with barely a year of independence each, had functional armies. Did the British leave them arms? Did they have enough revenue to purchase weapons in only one year? They had an airforce and a navy as well.
The army British used to control India compromised 90% of Indian soldiers only, in late 1940s they were on brink of rebelling that's why British decided to leave India and the armies comprising of our own people became armies of India and Pakistan
It was literally the british Indian army which later became the Indian and Pakistani army
Many of them were vets of WW2. Many fought in Burma (modern Myanmar) against Japs.
British conquered and controlled India with the help of Indians only. 90-95% of soldiers were Indian. Also, British never had full control over all of India. They didn't even have control over half of India. There were hundreds of princely states and most of them maintained some kind of army by themselves. Not to mention, despite the loot and thievery of Brits, there were hundreds of Indian Maharajas far richer than some of the richest people in the world today (minding inflation).
The British did leave them all the arms. The navy mutinied in 1946 due to lack of payments so London knew that the Indian military will simply not obey the crown anymore.
Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India
2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale,
3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz
A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah
B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending
C.) India was always the biggest regional power
D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir,
India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India,
your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless
And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir)
The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis!
Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,
Amarnath, Martand Suryadev Temple, Sharda Peeth, Kheer Bhawani,Jwalamukhi Maata Temple, Rani Temple Gulmarg => 🚩🕉️...
Cow p*ss
@@Westernmovie12 flying donkey ?
It is no claim by anyone ! It is a fact that Pakistan Pashtun tribes sent by Jinnah invaded Kashmir ! And all wars were started by Pakistan at large !
India invaded junagarh and Hyderabad so how about India vacate their regions first. Indias claim is so hypocritical we will conquer territories that are Hindu majority that were joining Pakistan but Pakistan can’t do the same 🥴🥴
Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India
2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale,
3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz
A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah
B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending
C.) India was always the biggest regional power
D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir,
India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India,
your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless
And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir)
The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis!
Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,@@umaryusuf537
Pakistani people's mindsets
1)Alhamdulillah hum musalman hai
2)As a Muslim citizen
3) Musalman hone ke nate
4) Being a Muslim
5) Pakistan main bahot Talent hai
6)Hum ek Azad mulk hain
7) India main musalmano pain bahot zulm hota hai
8) Kashmir Pakistan ka shahrak hai
9) Pakistan main akhliyaton ko puri azadi hain
1 0)India humse jalta hain
1 1)Hum ek Islami Automic takat hain
12)Humare pas zajba Eman hain
13)Humne kalma pada hain
1 4)Hindu Kafir kabhi Musalmano ka dost nahi ban
sakta
15) Hum zajbe wali Kom hain
1 6)musalmano ne hinduo pe 1400 sal hukumat ki hain
Aloohamdulha
Mohd Kai mooh main do do Rasgullah
eee😂😂
Gay hind
Gay shree ram
Gaou moutra zindabas
ola hu gaybar@@slimmy478-6
It's jzba lindu
@@slimmy478-6very good friend thanks you being a pakistani are admiring our gods though i think you are a little illeterate you need to replace 'G' with'j' and it will be fine or else allah ka ballah baja dunga ayesha ka bhi
So what u have......Jazba isi ko kehte golio ke same pathar.....fir bi tum logu ki fat ti hai 😂😅
This doesn’t mention the jammun massacres which occurred shortly before the conflict errupted. The armies of Kashmir began massacring thousands of muslim civilians in the jammun region in an successful attempt to turn the region minority muslim. Its estimated that around 100,000 muslims were killed in these massacres in jammun and the proportion of muslims in the region fell from 60% to 33%. In response, pashtun tribesmen began massacres of Hindus in the areas of jammun under their control, with the proportion of hindus in these regions falling from 10% to less than 1%. This was a large part in why the Pakistani government felt pressured to act and invade the princely state.
What on earth are you talking about. I fail to see the relevance of your frankly incorrect and ahistorical statement to the Kashmir conflict. Regardless, I will debunk your "points". Every religion and people have done violent things in the past, so what? Name me one that hasn't. Saying a bunch of unsourced claims do not help your point in the least. 1.) Indeed, Islam spread to the northern part of the Indian subcontinent through conquest, but so to did Hinduism with the Aryans and later Christianity with the British so I fail to see its relevance. If you are trying to say that it was caused by forced conversions than that is blatantly false, as shown by the fact that after 700 years of Muslim rule only around 70% of the Jammun region was muslim. Compare this to regions where forced conversions actually did take place such as Spain and the Philippines and you immediately see a difference as the persecuted religions of these places quickly faded within a few centuries. Even if forced conversions did take place, that doesn't change the fact that the Muslims there would still be the same indigenous inhabitants of the land so again I fail to see the relevance of your misinformation. If you are genuinely interested in learning about real and unbiased history, here are a few sourced and referenced threads about this topic which should shield some light, although I sincerely do doubt that you will read any of it. Alas, I've done what I can to combat your misinformation, the rest is up to whether or not you are willing to accept factual information from real historians rather than using your pre-conceived notions to make up claims of dubious veracity. www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/2enj7m/lets_talk_about_islam/
www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/ihkfeb/bad_history_of_india_the_mughals_and_especially/
@@JohnAdams-vd5dc
@@dranflame_1236Jammu Massacre is a fact.
@@dranflame_1236wrote such a long thesis, we all know the truth about Islam. Massacre happened everywhere during partition. How was Jammu different
@@JohnAdams-vd5dcLoL you are still living in 9th century ? You hindi speakers have no links with Kashmir. Kashmiris are proud Muslims and Pakistanis 🇵🇰
Keep shouting y'all peaceful people, "free Kashmir"(🇮🇳), "free Palestine"(🇮🇱), "free Xinjiang"(🇨🇳), "free Chechnya"(🇷🇺). Just check out one thing - "NOBODY IS LISTENING 😂"
Imagine how powerful and prosperous a united India could have been. Even if the only chnages were Pakistan and Bangladesh up to Indian SoL and less spendijg on the military would result in tens or hundreds of millions out if poverty, a more stable Afghanistan, a less adventerous China (and one with a stringer rival in Asia) and a wealthier happier world. All that assumes it doesnt descend into sectarian violence and insurgency.
The BJP wouldnt be in power andbthr Pakistani military wouldnt orevent denicracy in Pakistan. Man. . .
Absolutely wrong.
Partition was a good thing for India.
Had it remained United, India would have been extremely weak and divided politically, and always prone to external interferences.
I am thankful to Jinnah for partition and thus division of Indian Muslims into three countries.
@@krishnkant9477 Spoken like a true Hindi nationalist. Good for you sticking to your sectarian hatreds!
@@scoobydoobers23 Well thanks for the compliment.
I am really proud of my views and ideology
@@krishnkant9477 I can tell.
Absolutely wrong muslims would be the slave of the Hindu majority as we are a MASSIVE population we will never had excepted to be lived as a minority with being separate culture from the hindus
The map is very beautiful, the content is attractive
Map doesn't show eastern Kashmir which doesn't make sense, since it was annexed by the PLA in 1962.
A different perspective from Freedom at midnight! Muslims and Hindus had lived amicably prior to partition! One culprit in all this was Mountbatten a vainglorious selfish Royal ! Bringing forward the partition date with zero planning by an ungrateful country Indian and Pakistani soldiers laid their life for in a battle WW2 not of their making !! Perhaps the Japanese should have taken the subcontinent!
Kashmir is India
🤓
@@mudasserkhan00Don't even worry we will get it
yes it is
❤ indeed
Ofcourse it is! ❤
I realy like your videos. Amazing work
Hope we get a part 2 of the conflict
Its ongoing conflict with a ceasefire in place .
Although you should get sequals about 1965, 1971 , 1984, 1999.
Other than 1971, where the entirety of East Pakistan (modern Bangladesh) was liberated, you wouldn't find much border change in the rest, despite them still being large scale wars. One unique "operation" that did change the map was not a full fledged war (Operation Meghdoot, look it up), where India managed to liberate the entirety of the Siachen Glacier, and it remains the world's highest battle zone up till today.
In short pakistan got their ass kicked every single time
@@riderchallenge4250 Taj Mahal and Lal Qilla will be reminding you your history,
I wonder why Sardar Patel advised Nehru to not go to UN or even violate UN's decision to take all of J&K as Maharaja had already succeeded his state into India. Was he not alive? He had that kind of thinking and charisma already. Nehru is to blame. Indian army was capable enough.
It's due to reputation impact that can affect globally in future 🔮
First kashmir war beings because of jammu muslims massacre 😢
What about kahsmiri pandits massacre
@@HimanshuShukla-p5c the number of pandits killed since 1947 is less than 1,000. The number of Muslims killed during the Jammu massacres in a single year was 200,000. Why do you think there is still an insurgency in Kashmir valley? They don't want you there.
@user-lc3js8ki4b
That was a response for the Jammu massacres taking place in the first place.
Poonch rebellion ?
Mirpur Massacre ?
@@DANGARJOR really dude, the crime on kashmiri pandits have been taking place for more than 500years , it all started with shah mir till aurangzeb what do you have to say for that.
Our Indian 🇮🇳 brothers of GILGIT should get freedom from Pakistan and reunite with Us! Pakistan n China should move out of Indian Territory and stop this decades long Bloodshed!
Should have mentioned what is article of instrument is and how other 200+ princely states merged with india and pakistan signing this document.
I've noticed that there's a lot of Pakistanis and Indians with white skin, maybe because they're not mixed with dravidian race, maybe they are true Indo-Aryans and Irano-Aryans
I am a kashmir (from iok) And everyone here wants freedom especially from india
I’m from Kashmir and we want to stay with India. gilgit baltistan also wants to be part of India😌😌😌
Let's see what happens when you get rid of both sides and Ready to regret.
@@ahtisamanalovip o yea where do you live?
@@kezhiahnebula you don't need to care about us.
@@ahtisamanalovipma wan tar cxei pajeet chukh😂
*grabs popcorn* I’m sure these comments will be civil and nuanced
I'm from Gilgit which india considers part of indian occupied Kashmir.
We got independence from British backed dogras on 1st November 47 and we fought for it, later joined Pakistan
Pakistan crossed into Kashmir on 22 oct.
Idi0t it was a British General who led the gilgit regiment. Classic Divide & Conquer
I think people can have their as life as normal.
I think we need a passage to afghanistan freely.
Rest should be solved peacefully.
We should form a economic block like EU and call it a day.
Pakistani should first form a democratic government.
We don't even know who to deal with .As government are mostly proxies for army
@@hmmmm6685Pakistan will become a democratic country after Kashmir gains freedom.
@@Heykid18so you are saying you need kashmir to became a Democracy? Like what the fuck in kashmir that you want to became a democracy
@@hmmmm6685we already have south Asian Association for Regional Cooperation(SAARC)
Do U think that Muhummad Jinnah bhai hatred for Hindus'because his Hindus Parents were Kick out from Hindu community of Gujarat and Convert to Islam out of Compulsion /Frustration etc.
Say something about it !
@6:13 😂 my man said " decilating" 😂
Desolating
How often do you shave your skröppel a year? 😭
17 years ago .....what pc ur using sir?
Factually wrong on too many points, it was only when Pakistani Forces were about to surround Srinagar, the King acceded to India that too only for self defence. Pakistanis burnt and tortured subjects of Raja Hari Singh and to save his Kingdom from clutches of those disorderly Pakistanis, Raja Hari Singh acceded to India.
Kashmiri here,we don't want to be with India or Pakistan,
Well dream on baby you don't have choice wanna go free maybe the army can free you from you moral coil hahahaha
As a Muslim from Lahore, I want to emphasize that the people of Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir love and are proud of Pakistan.🇵🇰
@@karandullet380Average blind devotee, please focus on the Hindi belt, one of the poorest regions in the world.
@@karandullet380 inferior Hindu
@@Heykid18pakistan already rejected kashmir independence in 1947 when hari singh wanted freedom
Muslims are a majority in Regions like East Bengal, West Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkwa, Kashmir, Swat valley ! And so only these were made a part of Pakistan except Balochistan & Kashmir ! Balochistan an Independent Nation was invaded & annexed by Jinnah & Kashmir which was Princely State was invaded by Jinnah but the Invaders were pushed back by Indian Forces who came to save Kashmir from the invaders after Maharaja of Kashmir cried for help from India & agreed to Ascend to the Indian Union ! Khyber Pakhtunkwa was made a part of Pakistan through a rigged Referendum ! Balochistan even today is struggling for Independence from Pakistan !
Muslims being peaceful as usual.
Shut up!
It was a Muslim Majority region, and it was decided that areas with muslims majority will be given to Pakistan and those with hindu majority will be given to the Indian state. Kashmir had a Muslim majority, but their leader with hindu. So technically Kashmir belongs to Pakistan if we go in accordance to the British partition deal. BUT their leader Maharaja secretly decided that he'll unify his region to India. So in retaliation the Pakistani tribals fought against him.
Always blaming Muslims for everything bad is not good. It shows how little knowledge you have about the actual happenings, and how much you have speculated yourself to be the case.
So people like you are just jerks who nobody even listens to. Cuz its like wastage of time to argue with an illiterate person.
It was not a part of British India, it was left to choose. You violated that choice by invading Kashmir. Abd about it being a Muslim majority region, Umberkot, Karachi and Lahore were Hindu Sikh majority but were given to you. Will you talk about that? Pakistan is not a representative of subcontinental Muslims, it butchered over 3 million people in Bengal alone, a good reason is there to assume that most were Muslims. @@TacticalWolf145
@@TacticalWolf145the British partition deal didn't involve Muslim majority regions being part of Pakistan. It simply allowed different provinces and princely states to remain autonomous or choose to acceede to either country.
Lindus being peacefull as usual
Freedom for Kashmir from Pakistan
Pakistan did bad in Mirpur District of Kashmir and whole world should watch it...
Also, Watch, what happened in baramullah too
Nice job considering the northern west is Muslim majority.
You think India will take in another Northern West which was majority is Muslim
A word don't the whole region otherwise it another powder keg like the Balkan.
Partition is better.
@thanhhoangnguyen4754 I don't think so conquering lands is fun so we shall be doing that it's fun freeing people from their mortal coils and then living their land you know just another territory added into the republic
Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of india . The land of Emperor Lalitaditya muktapid 🙏🔱🕉️
But Jammu and Kashmir is not part of India. Be realistic,not idealistic
It's home to both Muslims and hindus.
@@pakanime1112 Muslims just invaders 😂
Jammu and Kashmir belongs to Pakistan ❤️🇵🇰
@@TopMegaEditslolol pakistani the IMF office is ahead go and beg for dullars theres😂
Fun Fact: Pakistan doesn't have Kashmir. The region it calls "azaad kashmir" is actually a western portion of Jammu.
By all accounts, Kashmir should have gone to (Pakistan) if the countries were based on religions, Kashmir was 77% Muslim.
The valley was, so I guess so but it didn't happen like that. And it's too late now, pride is at stake.
Kashmir was only a small region within the princely state. Princely state also included parts like Ladakh, Jammu & Aksai Chin which were Hindu/Buddhist majority. The princely state overall was Hindu/Buddhist majority
@@indiafirst3676 stop lying you can google it. In the 1901 Census of the British Indian Empire, the population of the princely state of Kashmir and Jammu was 2,905,578. Of these, 2,154,695 (74.16%) were Muslims, 689,073 (23.72%) Hindus, 25,828 (0.89%) Sikhs, and 35,047 (1.21%) Buddhists (implying 935 (0.032%) others).
@@indiafirst3676lol are you really that dumb. Kashmir had a clear Muslim majority. Plus Muslims were driven out of jammu by Hari Singh which also had a Muslim majority.
Then Hyderabad and junagadh should be in Pakistan@@user-rh9on2el1n
I am from Poonch
Only if the British general of Pakistan corpse followed Jinnah's orders, the entire Kashmir would have been liberated before Nehru ran to the UN for conducting a ceasefire.
If it was so then why Pakistani Army made no territorial gains in Kashmir ever since even though multiple wars were fought later.
Pakistani day dreaming
lol it was a British general who was heading the gilgit scouts which led to the capture of now occupied Gilgit-Baltistan know your facts; Nehru was arm twisted by Mountbatten then governor general and head of Indian armed forces to look for other means to settle the conflict as he refused to authorize further military actions the reason for this being the U.K had to secure it's "brass neck" by sending a message to the world that the transfer of power is as "peaceful " as possible.
Today's pakistani occupied kashmir has been taken by war... Indian occupied kashmir was not taken by war, it was gifted to them by the king... Pakistan lost more casualties then india but Pakistan didn't ran towards UN.. it was India then running away...
fyi pakistan army was pushed back from position which was a few km away from srinagar
I am proud that I am an Indian,I do believe entire Kashmir belong to Pakistan.
Love your video! This is why colonialism is so horrible.
Who was there before the British....who was there before that....who was there before that....and before that....and before that....? The world has been a swirling pot of wars and conquest from the start...
The subcontinent's natives weren't trying to kill eachother and seize land until the British Raj stopped governing. Just remember that.
@bryant-fr7sr The entirety of the subcontinent has been under complete and total warfare long, long before colonial powers came around... tribal and clan warfare and extreme brutality is well documented... check it out.
@@bryant-fr7sr mf trying to defend colonialism ahhh hell noo 💀🙏
Even without colonialism, based of what happened in other parts of the world, the muslim population and hindu population would have fight each other many times until they reached a settlement (if any) . While I don't endorse colonialism, the wars were most likely inevitable. In my opinion, there was no easy solution. A unified India would have most likely lead eventually to a revolt of muslim communities and even more fighting and death. War was inevitable is Indian subcontinent ...
Plz Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 should be next....!
to be cleaar the gilgit scouts has noting to do with local gilgit people its entirely operated by a british who made secreat deal with pakistan as he was supported by then british gov to cutoff indias direct access to central asia as you can see geopolitcs also playing its role here and the victim was india and still is ....
@prestallar4339 😂 even if it's true they never wanted to be separated it's only there general who was British somehow woke up in the morning and decided gilgits are not happy with india that's the irony
@prestallar4339 have u conducted a consus during that time lol , the way gilgits revolting against Pakistan this days it's clear indication that they didn't wanted it it was forced on them
@prestallar4339 I'm kasmiri myself lol
@@starsinthesky593support for Pakistan thorough Gilgit is strong most people there are pro Pakistan
@@umaryusuf537 bot
Britishers responsible everywhere
They gave you independence. How you handle that independence is your responsibility nobody else's.
Jammu Kashmir 🚩🕉️🐅🔱...
Belongs To Kashmiri Pandits and Dogras ...
At present let the original natives decide
Couldn't keep early Hindu empires from collapsing.
Now they wanna Kashmir 😂
India belongs to Muslims who ruled it for millenniums🔥🔥
@@BarlasofIndus can't even make a dent on a small nation of 9 million
@@BarlasofIndus my festival is older than islam
Good thing you shared both perspectives to this war. However I have an issue with how you say "He was also called Maharaja" Sir Maharaja means king. He was a king not called a king like some nick name.
Indo-Bangla, Indo-Pak Borders have to be re-drawn as they were drawn by British and not Locals
Divide and Conquer !
More like conqerer divide and leave
To be fair, they were only united because of the British conquering them in the first place. Besides them, only the Mauryans, Tughluqs and Mughals succeeded. The rest of history shows the land being a patchwork of different competing states.
@@Open__56more like ally, conquer, betray, conquer, rule, divide
@shortentertainment93 Not really,
Chalukyas ruled mostly in the deccan, The entire south was free from the Gupta's and the Marathas at their Greatest extent didn't even have South India, Bengal and some of the western areas like Punjab.
@shortentertainment93 Yes you're right.
i dont exactly knoow but i ll try to tell what happend in simple words so in jammu and kashmir there was muslinm majority but the king mahraja hari singh was hindu and wanted to join india but the muslim majority fought against this decision and managed to liberate some areas which are now part of pakistan
Now lemme tell you the true story
Maharaj was a nemesis of India coz he was an arch rival of Shiekh Abdullah, and shiekh abdullah was one of biggest ally of Nehru, this is the reason why initially he wasn't acceding Kashmir to India
2.) Gilgit rebels had attavked the vale even before when Indian forces had airlifted to Kashmir, this itself proove that Gilgit rebels had defeated the forces of Maharaja but not the Indian forces, India had finally invaded Kashmir from the south by 26th of oct, and Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir by 22nd of october, this proove that it was India, which had defeated Gilgit rebels and Pakitani forces and had moved them out of the vale,
3.) I agree India took the matter to UN, coz
A.) India had the support of Shikh abdullah
B.) Case of Junagarh was still pending
C.) India was always the biggest regional power
D.) India was overconfident about her position in Kashmir,
India was already defeating Pakistan, it was a diplomatic failure of India, if India had not took this matter to the UN, then it was just the matter of time, and whole Kahsmir would had been a part of India,
your histrory lessons needs to be checked, Jinnah had stooped at unimaginable levels , he had wanted to to establish the illegal state of Pakistan quite entirely over the Hindu India , his ill intentions were not just limited to the the 6 states, case of Junagarh and Hyderabad prooves that, and also if Pakistan could had the audacity of claiming Hindu majority Hyderabad and Hindu majority Junagrah on the basis of so-called IOA ,then why not India?India is way more powerfull and influentiol than Pakistan, if Pakistan can dare to provoke India, then the regional superpower India would surely retaliate and also the people of Kashmir had never wanted to join Pakistan, they just had wanted to get rid of the Dogra ruler, and for that they had been supporting Shiekh abdullah, shiekh abdullah was pro-India, coz of that jinnah had even referred Abdullah as a traitor, which had offended the Kashmiri people, and also we are talking about the 1940' sat that time, Hindus of kashmir used to make about 30 percent of the population( before the forcefull exodus of Hindus by the Muslims of Kashmir), and the Hindus of Kashmir(including Bhuddists and Sikhs)were and are still highly pro-India, so your arguments are quite baseless
And for the record, Pakistan wasn't really supporting a plebscide in Kashmir initially coz it knew that the peope would vote for Shiekj abdullah and he was sponsoring the legallity of the Instrument of Accession of Kashmir with India ,coz of this Pakistan voilated the UN resolution and din't vacate the occupied terretories,Dogra ruler was Hindu, but still his ties with the Indian government were quite bad(that's the reason why din't signed the IOA with the Indian government initially, but only after the Pakistani invasion of Kashmir)
The misleading info which is being spread by the Pakistani media has deeply infiltrated into the minds of Pakistanis!
Pakistan is purely at the fault, it's Pakistan, which is instigating this issue even after losing all the wars and conflicts against India, India is, was, will always be on the morally right side,
Kashmir belonged to Pakistan 🇵🇰. The state was overwhelmingly muslim. India invaded the Hyderabad & Junagadh muslim states based on the fact that the population of these 2 states was hindu. Pakistan had the similar right to oust hindu raja from the state. Sooner or later, Kashmir will be reunited with Pakistan.
dream costs 0$ better stick to watching cartoons
@@AbhinandanABSTHEY GOT 40%
Kashmir belongs to Kashmiris.
Kashmir is india..no matter how much you try...you will get sheet
The ruler was a Hindu bud.
If Britisher just wanted to leave and didn't have any intention to divide then why were sri lanka, mayanmar and Maldives devided from India there were no religious reasons there neither was someone demanding a separate state for them.
The real reason why the partition was rushed 1 year is not because of unstability in India, no no no
It was because they ( British ) had intelligence that Mohammed ali jinah had T.B .
British didn't have Sri Lanka
@@Gamer72-12 pls Fact chechk yourself. British did have Sri Lanka. They called it Ceylon. It got independence in 1948 and British deliberately gave it independence a year later so that it won't merge with India.
Country called India came into existence only because of British.
Sri Lanka wasn't a part of British Raj. Sri Lanka was a separate colony called British Ceylon. Even before British colonization, Sri Lanka was independent. It was ruled by Sinhalese kingdoms since 543 BCE. Sri Lanka has no reason to merge with India.
It's same for Myanmar. Myanmar was ruled by Burmese and Mon empires. Myanmar was connected with India by British. But later, They created a separate colony called British Burma. Also Myanmar won't like to lose their thousands years sovereignity by becoming a part of India.
Also Sri Lanka and Myanmar are Buddhists. So, They are religiously different from India. Also They are ethnically different from India.
@@worlddata8982 India was a name given to India by tye Greeks not the British.
We Indians have always considered the enture Indian subcontinent as our civilization. We called our civilization Bharat. Even before British colonized India the Maratha emipre had a claim on all of India including Sri lanka and for God 's sake literally it's name Sri Lanka is given to them by us. They are our part from Ramayan, actually as per new evidence that might be the place where our civilization actually started.
There empires were also Indian empires like there are Indian empires in any other region but if we talk about Indian empires of mainland India that ruled Sri Lanka they were ruled by The chola empire till 1070 CE. Later they were also the vassal of the great Vijayanagar empire. Nonetheless it doesn't matter whatever is part of our civilization is part of our civilization.
If you are talking about religion then you should Hindus also worship Gautam Buddha. Bhodh panth is part of Sanatana Dharma or Dharma. Buddha was a Indian and we during Ashok's time gave Lanka and Mayanmar Buddhism ☸ .
@@worlddata8982 Don't worry it soon will be 😊
@12:14 there are over one million Indian troops stationed in Jammu & Kashmir. I spent 6 months in Srinagar and surrounding areas, I saw how horrible they treat the locals. I have videos on my page about it.
Yes, Sir. But much better than US troops treat iraqis, syrians or afghans.
@@sourovdas7883so if us was oppressing other people, you'll start doing that too?
@@LgbtIsAConspiracy Not necesarily. Just saying what indian army doing is necessary for its national security, but USA like to do some extra, war is like video game for them. Tbh i wouldn't go to judge them but if some random "US Keyboard force" soldier come to judge us, cant help but point towards their own dirty a**.
@@LgbtIsAConspiracy bro what they do with kasmiri pandit
They are the one living there before any muslim was born
What isi do with them
error all people
and some who save their life are exodus in their own country
What happened to 25% hindu sikha Christian Buddhist
Same thing with the people of kasmiri
The head of jama masjid is error because he supports india
By isi and support of cia
Do share like Any of us care about it spoiler alert we don't hahhahaha
3:39 and to this day that territory pictured there seems to be contested by china and india and pakistan, and historically was also contested by greece and persia if i recall and not sure if any of the asian steppe nomadic tribes raided it or claimed it or not, not to mention both britain and russia probably wanted it during their "great game" shenanigans.
Free Kashmir from Pakistan. I’ve seen massive protests in the past few months from Giljit Balistan who wants nothing from Pakistan.
Free Balochistan as Pakistan illegally and forcefully took their state.
Free Sindh as Sindhis don’t want to be part of Pakistan
Finally Free Punjab from Pakistan😌😌😌😌😌😌😌
😂 Tell me you have completely unintellectual hatred against Pakistan without telling me that you have. 🤣
@@IbrahimMalik006 why not ? after 100s of teror attaks that you have done
@@AbhinandanABS What about the terror attacks done by India? For instance, have you ever heard of a man named Kalbushan Yadav?
@@AbhinandanABS Even though many of the terror attacks have been only blamed to Pakistan by India but there are still terror attacks which India did too.
Your saying that the British just wanted to go from india is not true ,THE so called British wanted to split india up as much they could before going and that's the truth so Queen Victoria had said if we meening the British loss india split it up as much u can otherwise this country will become very strong all uk has done this all over the world to rule and know usa nato and uk and some western countries are trying the some thing with russia and that's the truth.
Great video but it was important to mention that five days before Pakistani troops entered Kashmir, the Maharaja state forces initiated a large scale genocide in Jammu killing over 200K Muslims and reducing this majority to a minority population. Indians keep living in this delusion where they reject the ruler’s jurisdiction in the case of Junagdh (Muslim ruler wanted to accede to Pakistan with Hindu majority) but happily seem to accept jurisdiction over Muslim Kashmir just because the ruler acceded to India.
Those 200 k Muslims were killed by pakistani irregulars and pak army which latter they blamed on maharaja
@@warriorblack832one word 🤌🏻 Goberbhakt
Source:- pak army propoganda machine which is busy fighting elections 😂😂
Your being one sided on the story of kashmir you princess!
It's our land... We are😮giving an inch
Pakistan took good steps. Only if it was more successful and disciplined
Congratulation Pakistan For Winning First War Against India 1947. Taking Half Of Kashmir,Gilgit And Baltistan Within 1 Year Was Not An Easy Task. ❤️
pakistani imperialist.
🤣🤣
What joke 😂india came late and still took 66% of kashmir 😂😂
@@prateeksharma6706india didn’t take 66% of Kashmir the maharaja Joined india so Indian troops just walked in. Today india controls around 45% of Kashmir only
@@umaryusuf537 nope indian army pushed paki army back from poonch baramullah leh and shrinagar effectively comtrolling 66% or 2/3rd of kashmir by land 80% by population
Not A good video a lot of details not included the Troubles in Poonch dates back to 19th century and is complex to understand
First Kashmir War involved battles in highest terrain like in Skardu, Operation Gulmarg and the 5 day plan to take Srinagar the capital seems deliberately ignored, The Massacres at the Cities like Baramulla, Kotli, Mirpur etc are not included in the video, The Rebellion of the Muslim troops in The Maharaja's Army namely the Gilgit Scouts which helped Pakistan to gain cities like Gilgit easily during the initial days and THE BRITISH ROLE IN THE WAR are missing which can make audience learn better about conflict.
Disliking the video
Hope that you read and respond AND take criticism in positive manner