For those moving up from a smartphone to a camera for the first time, I don't see how they can eliminate the touch screen or articulating screen. It's hard to justify spending that much money for a camera that lacks basic features. If I were advising a friend, I'd suggest saving up for the R50 instead.
More and more people seem to be shooting from the screen! But in bright conditions it is great to have an EVF. Everyone has their own preferences though.
There's a reasonable price difference between the R10 and R100, so there are quite a few more features in the R10. If you can justify the spend, a more capable camera is always better!
@@OrmsTV Thanks. Yes, I feel the R10 was a camera that passed under the radars - on YT reviews - it's like a EOS RP done right (apart being a APS-C) with updated Digic X. the only thing i stopping me is to know how it behave using a EF-S lens, crop or less autofocus issues
For those moving up from a smartphone to a camera for the first time, I don't see how they can eliminate the touch screen or articulating screen. It's hard to justify spending that much money for a camera that lacks basic features. If I were advising a friend, I'd suggest saving up for the R50 instead.
As a photographer myself, I think the R10 is better than the R50 and WAAAAY better than the R100. I'll stick to the Nikon Z30.
That's the way they're filling their lineup, with the R100 as the starting point. The best camera is the one you have!
It is rebel t7 in rf mount
Yes, we think the R100 is the RF equivalent.
480 it’s great for a gift
Good day
What Camera and gears to start with as a landscape beginner?
Any camera will do! Rather focus on your lenses. If you want to get big open landscapes look for some nice wide angle lenses.
@@OrmsTV thank you I will to the shop when I got time thank you
personal opinion, EVF is the one thing that should be removed, not the flip out touch screen
More and more people seem to be shooting from the screen! But in bright conditions it is great to have an EVF. Everyone has their own preferences though.
A question, how does this may compare to the R10?
There's a reasonable price difference between the R10 and R100, so there are quite a few more features in the R10. If you can justify the spend, a more capable camera is always better!
@@OrmsTV Thanks. Yes, I feel the R10 was a camera that passed under the radars - on YT reviews - it's like a EOS RP done right (apart being a APS-C) with updated Digic X.
the only thing i stopping me is to know how it behave using a EF-S lens, crop or less autofocus issues
if only they dont cripple the screen it would be a good buy
For $200 more, R50 is way better.
Another $200 will get you an R10. We assume Canon is trying to cater to those people who don't have the extra cash.
The worst canon ever!!!