Canon RF 10 20mm f/4: First Look

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • What is a rectilinear lens? The Canon RF10-20mm f/4 L IS STM is! This ultra-wide zoom delivers incredibly wide images with zero barrel and pin cushion distortion. We got our hands on the new RF version of Canon's popular EF 12-24mm f/4 before launch to see if the new kid on the block would live up to its predecessor's stature.
    BUY PHOTOGRAPHIC GEAR
    Orms Direct: www.ormsdirect....
    BE CREATIVELY ENRICHED
    Orms Connect - The Orms Blog: bit.ly/2Fsu2ro
    FOLLOW ORMS
    Instagram: / ormsdirect
    Facebook: / ormsdirect
    Twitter: / ormsdirect
    We use Artlist for all our music licensing: artlist.io/
    ABOUT ORMSTV
    OrmsTV is one of the leading photo- and videographic UA-cam channels in South Africa. We create videos about the latest cameras, news and rumours roundups for the avid gearhead community and rich educational content where we share the knowledge of local industry experts. Familiar faces you may recognise include Deon, our veteran host and resident Fujifilm fanboy; Andre, one of our sales reps and amazing gear expert; and Matt, our Visual Content Creator who occasionally steps out from behind the camera to contribute to our community.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @brianbeattyphotography
    @brianbeattyphotography 11 місяців тому

    man, this is the first lens that really has me tempted to move totally over to RF

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  11 місяців тому +2

      You won't regret making the switch. The quality of all the RF glass is amazing.

  • @PeterHollos
    @PeterHollos 11 місяців тому

    great video! Nice. THX, Greetings from Vienna/Austria

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  11 місяців тому

      Thank you!

  • @egi75
    @egi75 11 місяців тому

    I would also be excited for a ultra wide fast prime lens..

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  11 місяців тому

      You and a lot of astro photographers I'm sure! We're looking forward to seeing what Canon has in store.

  • @salvamando1
    @salvamando1 11 місяців тому

    This is great, Canon is killing it with cool lenses! I wonder if this means that for video, a human subject would also look less distorted? I am planning to pair it with my C70!

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  11 місяців тому +1

      It's a great video option! If you're mindful with your compositions it'll be great for humans. If you put them in the center edges of the frame they will get a bit stretched and squished.

    • @salvamando1
      @salvamando1 11 місяців тому +1

      @@OrmsTV Awesome, thanks for the tip!

  • @dima1353
    @dima1353 11 місяців тому

    What about distortion ? Recently Canon has stopped worrying about this parameter. 14-35 has around 7%, 24 1.8 around 9% and 16 2.8 - i would say it is a half-fish-eye lens - 11-12%, something like that. Is it same story here ?

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  11 місяців тому +1

      We didn't see any barrel or pin cushion distortion. The only distortion we noticed is the stretching and squeezing in the middle edges of the imaged. Have a look at the samples in the video, the lines on the edge of the frames are dead straight.

    • @dima1353
      @dima1353 9 місяців тому

      @@OrmsTV On digital-picture it looks like a 8-9% at 10mm. If you didn't notice the distortion, then you were looking at a file to which a correction profile was applied

  • @angelogarciajr5356
    @angelogarciajr5356 11 місяців тому +5

    Dont need any more f4s. F1.2 or 1.4 please, Canon

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  11 місяців тому +2

      Can you imagine the size of this lens if it was an f/1.4 or 1.2!

    • @momenteimlicht3375
      @momenteimlicht3375 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@OrmsTVi dont think He means this lens in particular. He speaks about a 35mm or any other lens...

    • @nordic5490
      @nordic5490 10 місяців тому

      ​@@momenteimlicht3375my Canon RF 85 F1.2 is superb. Best in the biz. Stopping down to f1.4 is not the same as f1.2, and @ f1.2 is sharp as a tack. I use it for closer sports.

  • @leef3167
    @leef3167 10 місяців тому

    Would it work for astrophotography?

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  10 місяців тому

      It would work for astro, just keep in mind that it is f/4 so it wouldn't be letting in as much light as you'd ideally want.

  • @Nicky411
    @Nicky411 11 місяців тому

    Excellent side-by side comparisons. I'm tempted to get this lens, but never really shoot this wide.

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  11 місяців тому +1

      Thank you! It's an interesting focal length to shoot at, ending up with an image quite different to what the eye sees! But, it can be very rewarding when you get it right.

  • @gavinmcjannet7231
    @gavinmcjannet7231 8 місяців тому

    RF lenses are so overpriced, it difficult to get excited about a new lens when it is out of most peoples reach.

  • @mbismbismb
    @mbismbismb 11 місяців тому +1

    Rip sony nikon 😂

    • @robertadams3666
      @robertadams3666 11 місяців тому +1

      Haha, great lens for sure

    • @OrmsTV
      @OrmsTV  11 місяців тому

      It'll be interesting to see what they reply with!

    • @robertadams3666
      @robertadams3666 11 місяців тому

      @@OrmsTV yea I think Sony will respond. I will say the 12-24 2.8 they have is really impressive as well but not rectilinear and no IS. Still an amazing piece of glass.

    • @nordic5490
      @nordic5490 10 місяців тому

      ​@@robertadams3666Sonys small 46m mount is the limiting factor. Sony could not replease a 10 or 11mm rectiinear due to vignetting on that smaller mount. Note Canon and Nikon both use 52mm mounts.