WHAT IS THE MOST POWERFUL 5.7L CHEVY? 350-HP L46 vs 360-HP LT-1 vs 300-HP LT1 vs 345-HP LS1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лип 2024
  • SMALL BLOCK CHEVY VS LT1 VS LS1-WHICH ONE MAKES MORE POWER? WHICH 5.7L SHOULD YOU CHOOSE? DO THE OLDER MUSCLE CAR SMALL BLOCKS MAKE MORE POWER THAN THE MODERN SMALL BLOCKS? HOW DOES THE GEN 1 (360-HP) LT-1 COMPARE TO THE GEN 2 (300-HP) LT1? DID THE 350-HP 350 REALLY MAKE 350 HP? HOW DOES THE 300-HP LT1 COMPARE TO THE LATER 345-HP LS1? IF YOU WERE WONDERING WHAT THE BAD BOY SMALL IS, CHANCES ARE YOU WILL FIND IT TESTED HERE! CHECK IT OUT- A BIG 5.7L V8 SHOOT OUT!
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 287

  • @briancoffman3283
    @briancoffman3283 2 роки тому +77

    Richard, it would be great if you would do a full build on a gen 2 LT1! Show all the LS guys what they're capable of

    • @rogergm92
      @rogergm92 2 роки тому +13

      That's Grubb Worm's purpose in life 🔥

    • @mattcossel29
      @mattcossel29 2 роки тому +3

      Steve Morris has a video of a GM block gen 2 lt1 engine making right at 2000hp on his engine dyno.

    • @governmentcalamari9785
      @governmentcalamari9785 2 роки тому +1

      @@rogergm92 and he’s not even the only one. The lt1 has run times near him before just in a auto

    • @stevewalker412
      @stevewalker412 2 роки тому

      @@rogergm92 who's this

    • @roymcdre9180
      @roymcdre9180 2 роки тому

      Eww

  • @tunerdadtunerdad7927
    @tunerdadtunerdad7927 2 роки тому +19

    Excellent video. The Gen2 LT1's are the red headed stepchild of the SBC's. I have a completely stock other than 355 gears and a built 700r4, 1993 C4 corvette 40th edition. Surprise a lot of people with that old car. Love it. Love the video. Brings back good memories of the old "camel humps"....LOL

    • @shadowopsairman1583
      @shadowopsairman1583 2 роки тому +3

      Supposedly the TBI 350s were considerd LT1s which are Gen 2 SBCs. In that case id remove the TBI and put a TPI/LT1 intake on it with a Low Energy Ignition (LS1 coils)

    • @alonzahanks1182
      @alonzahanks1182 2 місяці тому +1

      @@shadowopsairman1583 Those were Swirl port captains bar heads got great gas milage But LT1 has tumble and fast burn race heads

  • @Tim_ToolMayne_Taylor
    @Tim_ToolMayne_Taylor 2 роки тому +12

    Just when we thought that Richard found all the “I wonder if” tests we are too poor to do, he finds another we forgot about. Keep up the great work!

  • @NaturallyaspiratedJJM
    @NaturallyaspiratedJJM 2 роки тому +7

    Looking forward to the LT5 vs LS6 shootout!

  • @regblkss
    @regblkss 2 роки тому +9

    Lt5 vs ls6 vs 96 lt4 next test for the king of 5.7

  • @jordantownsendracing5782
    @jordantownsendracing5782 2 роки тому +13

    Great video as always. Can't wait to see the LT5. As a previous c4 ZR1 owner I'll always have a soft spot for that engine.

    • @fnafplayer6447
      @fnafplayer6447 5 місяців тому

      Yeah it is probably never gonna happen

  • @jonhayden6235
    @jonhayden6235 2 роки тому +5

    Richard, thank you for sharing another excellent in-depth comparison. Your June 2010 MotorTrend article comparing the '70 LT-1 to the 1996 LT1 was instrumental in helping us decide on our swap (click on avatar to view) way back when, and we've been fans ever since. Keep up the great work, and we'll keep following your channel!

  • @TommioRS
    @TommioRS 2 роки тому +11

    Im soo down to see what the LT-5 makes! I swear its under rated by the factory.

  • @troy8940
    @troy8940 2 роки тому +5

    I'm excited can't wait for the Z06 performance test 🙌

  • @JC-gw3yo
    @JC-gw3yo 2 роки тому +10

    Back in the day, I ran a 1970 LT1 in a Z-28 Camaro... It was a great car and engine. I updated the cam to a Racer Brown STX 21 solid lifter(I believe), and the 350 then made right at 400 horsepower and revved out to 7000. Roller rockers were definitely needed then as the Racer Brown cams increased action, burnt up factory rockers. That cam really brought that engine alive. The factory cam was plain lazy...

    • @albertgaspar627
      @albertgaspar627 2 роки тому

      well, the OEM cam was meant for operating AC and vacuum options and a wide range of driving styles. Mellow in a 350, less so in a 301 with a 780 cfm Holley.

    • @MasterWitchDoctor
      @MasterWitchDoctor 2 роки тому

      WHAT IS FISHER-PRICE HELL KIND OF NAME IS RACER BROWN? Ever heard of Lunati? Now theres a cam company.

    • @albertgaspar627
      @albertgaspar627 2 роки тому

      @@MasterWitchDoctor Racer Brown was a big name back in the day, like Isky or Clay Smith (y' know the woody woodpecker guy). there was Reed, Howards, Potvin, Webber, General Kinetics, Sig Erson, Shelby, Schnieder, and you could buy custom van parts from a Sears or JC Penny catalog. People think the internet has brought on a slew of custom car parts at our fingertips, but they always existed. and then there was the cheap-o crap, JC Whitney, Almquist, Honest Charley, etc.
      Then Holley/Mr Gasket began buying up brands under one umbrella...

  • @angelovasilikos7980
    @angelovasilikos7980 2 роки тому +2

    Love this test!!! Awesome!

  • @GuruTwan
    @GuruTwan 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you Richard I need to hear this much appreciated

  • @dejanfreighter2926
    @dejanfreighter2926 Рік тому +1

    Thank you Sir, priceless lessons 🙏

  • @allworldmusic8270
    @allworldmusic8270 7 місяців тому +1

    Really love these videos of the old chev small blocks

  • @georgebrooks58
    @georgebrooks58 2 роки тому +5

    I’m routing for the LS6

  • @masskhamisi4
    @masskhamisi4 2 роки тому +8

    The gen 2 LT1 and LS1 are under rated ...

  • @michaelallen2501
    @michaelallen2501 2 роки тому +12

    I'm always on team gen 2 LT1 lol.

  • @genelong1748
    @genelong1748 2 роки тому +2

    👌👍 Thank you for sharing so much information.
    My son and I are building a F.E.D. and using your thoughts on the engine build. Will send pictures when done 😊

  • @koraykumru1295
    @koraykumru1295 4 місяці тому +1

    You are the guy who convinced me to get a station wagon with the gen 2 lt1. I love the engine a lot!

  • @kenp639
    @kenp639 2 роки тому +9

    1996 LT4? I think it is worth finding one and testing it since it is the true and all-time king of the hill in the Gen 1-2 LT world.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 роки тому +2

      I did forget about the LT4

    • @raymckinney604
      @raymckinney604 2 роки тому +2

      They say the bottom end is worth a few hp with tricks, Cam a few more then sodium raised runner heads and taller intake a few, then the 1.6 Roller rocker's... I'd say it makes 400 hp on his dyno

  • @vincewilson1890
    @vincewilson1890 2 роки тому +2

    Can't wait to see LS6 vs. LT5!

  • @chuck6958
    @chuck6958 2 роки тому +12

    Richard, great video, can’t wait to see the LT5 vs LS6! Would be cool to see a Gen 1 build to be comparable to the LS engines and see how they compare (i.e., better heads, coil on plug, EFI, etc)… any chance?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 роки тому

      I don't see a reason to modify the SBC to keep up with a stock Ls1-not sure what that proves

    • @raymckinney604
      @raymckinney604 2 роки тому

      I'd like to see a Dunn head 95 LT5 dyno verus 02 up LS6 as well

  • @dannytravis7118
    @dannytravis7118 2 роки тому +2

    Time and technology has really brought big horsepower back from the weak late 70s and 80s. Makes me think about adding new age tech to old school engines. Cam and heads are so much more efficient and cheaper than 20 to 30 years ago. Just comparing the fuelie double hump heads to modern vortex heads is daylight and dark differences.

  • @musclebone7875
    @musclebone7875 2 роки тому +5

    I used to be a sbc fan until I got my first bbc😜 torque monster 👻

  • @Skubasteph
    @Skubasteph 2 роки тому +1

    cant wait to see that lt5 on the dyno. really cool engine.

  • @samholcombe3129
    @samholcombe3129 2 роки тому +2

    I can’t wait to see LS6 vs LT5, both 405 hp and close to 400 ft-lbs, but it’ll be interesting to see how they compare in power bands.

  • @JoshF89
    @JoshF89 7 місяців тому +3

    My favorite is the l46

  • @LaserLuther
    @LaserLuther 2 роки тому +1

    I love all of them.

  • @bigdogsportingtonyb2833
    @bigdogsportingtonyb2833 5 місяців тому

    Once we stage 2 port the efi LT1s heads and intake manifold power gains are 60-70hp more with no other parts changes, for those wondering. Add a better cam and the power increases go through the roof.

  • @outdamudtv
    @outdamudtv 2 роки тому +2

    We had a lt1 with lt4 hot can kit thang was a beast

  • @garrisonnichols807
    @garrisonnichols807 Рік тому +1

    You can't go wrong with any version of the Chevy small block. It's my favorite engine. They're all amazing.

    • @GORILLA_PIMP
      @GORILLA_PIMP 6 місяців тому

      Naw you can definitely "go wrong" with an LT1
      Maybe you should do more research before showcasing your ignorance?

  • @The_R-n-I_Guy
    @The_R-n-I_Guy 2 роки тому +2

    Love the gen 2 LT1!!! I just wish they weren't so expensive to modify. I've got a 96 Buick Roadmaster sedan and it's pretty good. I just wish I could afford to make it better

  • @crackercasey4556
    @crackercasey4556 2 роки тому +2

    Gotta love a 90s lt1

  • @Kstang09
    @Kstang09 2 роки тому +6

    I tol' that teacher, only math i need is 5.7 = 3'fiddy ;)

  • @vortecmacs
    @vortecmacs Рік тому +1

    I want to see an LT4-LS1-LS6-LT5 shootout.

  • @stephenkowalski2448
    @stephenkowalski2448 2 роки тому +3

    Really look forward to LT5 vs LS6. As for LT4 it probably makes similar power to LS1

  • @contraption22
    @contraption22 2 роки тому +3

    Richard, please revisit the gen 2 LT1 cam upgrade with proper valve springs.

  • @jasonkepic1132
    @jasonkepic1132 7 місяців тому +1

    I'd truly be delighted to see more LT1 vids. All things LT1 perhaps??ps ? I've seen "the other guys" vid multiple times already and it was great. So I'm confused. In that vid you claimed the LT1 was even more powerful than a 5.3..

  • @CelebznbodysuitNeckMaskz
    @CelebznbodysuitNeckMaskz Рік тому +1

    93 Firebird Formula here ....love the Lt1 over my old 99 trans am ls .. ls issues lol .lt1 is great

  • @Mr.Cadillac94
    @Mr.Cadillac94 2 роки тому +1

    I would love to see a build series on the L31 chevy truck motor.

  • @raymckinney604
    @raymckinney604 2 роки тому +3

    I'd like to see a 1996 LT4 dyno

  • @mohakinincbe
    @mohakinincbe 2 роки тому +8

    As someone who's getting ready to start building a gen 2 LT1, I would love to see some more content around how they handle boost and how far you can get them N/A with all the workings and some valve springs! Great content, Richard!

    • @tunerdadtunerdad7927
      @tunerdadtunerdad7927 2 роки тому +3

      Same. I have a nice lt1 c4 an a Holley Terminator X for it. Just have to get the Torqhead and wait for it to blow up so I have an excuse to yank it and build.

    • @ericbrandt829
      @ericbrandt829 2 роки тому +1

      They only handle boost while the Opti-Spark is functioning.....Hope you are going to different system!

    • @mohakinincbe
      @mohakinincbe 2 роки тому +2

      As of right now I'm planning on using torqhead but I know there are a couple other systems that I might look into but the opti will be no more after the build is complete.

    • @bartpang
      @bartpang 2 роки тому +2

      Do a search for Grubworm Camaro!

    • @mohakinincbe
      @mohakinincbe 2 роки тому +1

      @@bartpang that's what started me on even wanting to rebuild the engine. He's going to be switching to a gen1 350 later this year. He doesn't use the reverse cooling from the gen 2, which makes sense. I will not be going turbo though. It'd still be fun to see a big bang of the gen 2 LT1!

  • @ryancaves4639
    @ryancaves4639 2 роки тому +2

    Plz Richard more old school 5.7 lt1 videos!!

  • @bigblocklawyer
    @bigblocklawyer 2 роки тому +2

    Next test...factory tri-power set ups vs single carb. Pontiac, Chrysler, Ford. I'd kill to see a 435 like mine go up against an L72. 100 cfm more carb shouldn't make that much difference, but GD that 435 is a monster. I made mine an L-89 but that's just for weight and cool factor. It is 1000% factory in a '67 Corvertte coupe, but I'd happily go up against any engine from back in the day. Lost a little zip when I went back to a 4.10 from a 4.56, but even as a weekend car, that's a lot of noise with side pipes.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 роки тому

      l89 alum-headed tri power-very cool-I would love to compare the Tri to the L72

  • @johnnyboyssite
    @johnnyboyssite 2 роки тому +1

    very nice

  • @Matp345
    @Matp345 2 роки тому +2

    A predictable outcome but still great video. Like to see the 90s lt1 with a hotcam

  • @xlr8r3VA
    @xlr8r3VA 2 роки тому +7

    It's all about airflow. The Gen 1 SBC has 23 degree heads, the Gen 2 LT1 has 21 degree heads, and the LS1 has 15 degree heads. All things even, the compression, cam specs, etc, the LS1 will still out perform them all because it will flow more air, because of the more efficient heads. What I would like to see you test is a SBC with same compression, and same cam specs as the LS1, but with 15 degree heads. Who will win?

    • @sebastianwallace268
      @sebastianwallace268 2 роки тому +1

      lt1 had 23 degree heads stock just like the gen 1 sbc.

    • @xlr8r3VA
      @xlr8r3VA 2 роки тому +1

      @@sebastianwallace268 Your right, my bad. It's the Trick Flow LT1 heads that have the 21 degree valve angle. Still the LS1 kills them all.

    • @chrishansen7004
      @chrishansen7004 2 роки тому +1

      @@xlr8r3VA can't beat the original small block Chevy sound though can't really find a better sounding engine than a cammed carbed 350

  • @matthewdupuis232
    @matthewdupuis232 2 роки тому +2

    You also missed the L31, LOL

  • @blown572hemi
    @blown572hemi 2 роки тому +1

    The one with the best head's. Going out on a limb

  • @eyeshocars9978
    @eyeshocars9978 2 роки тому +3

    Do a stock gen 2 330hp Lt4 vs Ls1/Ls6. And a full gen 2 Lt1 build would be great. And by the way, when is the Lt1 and 4.3 internals swap going to happen?

  • @slows102
    @slows102 2 роки тому +4

    Without watching first I'm guessing the ls1 even though it's rated the least

    • @bcubed72
      @bcubed72 2 роки тому +2

      SAE net vs gross. You're comparing apples to oranges.

  • @roymcdre9180
    @roymcdre9180 2 роки тому +1

    A kid showed me his catfish camaro on the chassis dyno with a cai put down 345whp. No wonder them cars run high 12s with bolt ons

  • @unclesquirrel6951
    @unclesquirrel6951 2 роки тому +7

    Personally I blame squirrels

  • @19Clutch69
    @19Clutch69 2 роки тому +2

    Great test... my generation..lol...in my 50s now

  • @mikehunntt5338
    @mikehunntt5338 2 роки тому +1

    Im going with the 5.7 for the win!

  • @miyeknunnaya3116
    @miyeknunnaya3116 2 роки тому +2

    Just discovered this channel and I’m so glad I did! I just bought a 1969 Pontiac firebird with a 350 in it and I’m looking to do a rebuild/add some more hp and torque. My question is, have you ever done a build on a Pontiac 350 from that year? What’s the Max I can push it to and still keep it fairly “reliable” thanks in advance if you see this. Liked and subscribed!

  • @bradmarking9106
    @bradmarking9106 2 роки тому +1

    Would like to see ZZ6-dyno run ,with carb and fuel injection results too!

  • @shadowopsairman1583
    @shadowopsairman1583 2 роки тому +1

    Ok a TPI 350 with Vortec Heads and Low Energy Ignition (Low Intensity=LS) system.

  • @enviro7673
    @enviro7673 2 роки тому +2

    So so what exactly made the gen 2 lt1 make that much power when it was rated for 300 hp when it came out, and 275 in the camaros?

  • @alonzahanks1182
    @alonzahanks1182 2 місяці тому +1

    I am actually scared of LT1 manafolds because nobody has ever done that
    LS1s ought to bolt up Edelbrock has one but cost 700 and nobody knows if it even works

  • @weskirkland5850
    @weskirkland5850 11 місяців тому +1

    Do a camaro LT1 with aluminum heads N/A with the lt4 hotcam.

  • @internallycombusted1
    @internallycombusted1 2 роки тому +2

    nice video. always fun to watch. do something weird, i have an idea, 265 sbc with vortec heads, use only gm parts.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 роки тому +1

      I don't think the bore size will work with that head

    • @internallycombusted1
      @internallycombusted1 2 роки тому

      @@richardholdener1727 just stock gm vortec head with 1.94/1.50 valves, might fit? would be neat to see how much power to get out of the smallest sbc!

    • @bluecollarhotrods9781
      @bluecollarhotrods9781 2 роки тому

      @@richardholdener1727 - same thing I thought, 265s were only 3.5" bore, smaller than even a 305. I question weather or not even the 305 H.O. 416 castings would work on the 265.

  • @willrobb9520
    @willrobb9520 Рік тому +3

    What about the LT4?

  • @derrelcarter9401
    @derrelcarter9401 2 роки тому +2

    I Like it. Would "like" to have seen the early engines upgraded with modern heads, stock intakes and then the RPM airgap intake square & RPM spread bore, with the original factory cams? The heads were definitely the weakest link, then the intakes. Oh well if the Crypto alt coins do a mini moon shot before the Big crash, I will build my own dyno facility and test to my hearts content. Yes, I understand these were done in the past, because I already watched all of them!!!! That is How Much I Like your work!

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 роки тому +1

      why would we upgrade just the early motors (which was done for another vid)

    • @derrelcarter9401
      @derrelcarter9401 2 роки тому +1

      @@richardholdener1727 the late model gets plenty of Love? The early ones, even the 327 (Great test series by way!), all got cams 1st or at the same time as the heads? Then you/I will build a gen one like a LS, thinner rings, equivalent sloppy specs cam, similar rocker ratio, compression, oiling system, same header size and I suppose an RPM Airgap with a 750 cfm holley. Since the gen1 motors have ZERO intake systems that can compete with the LS! Yes, I am pretty sure who will win, by how much? Just dreaming Bud, keep up the Great work. If the tail is not left hanging, no one can yank it? Peace

  • @doolallyproductions7234
    @doolallyproductions7234 Рік тому +2

    Never got the lt5 vs ls6

  • @coryholbrook4643
    @coryholbrook4643 2 роки тому +3

    Really strange that back 20 yrs ago when I had my Firehawk, 95 model with T56 and mail order tune as my only mod, I had no problem at all keeping up with the supposedly much faster LS f-bodies... considering this test shows that engine made about 50hp more.

    • @coryholbrook4643
      @coryholbrook4643 2 роки тому

      Aww tiger 1945 why did you delete your completely stupid post? I was looking forward to replying.

  • @melissadunagan6596
    @melissadunagan6596 Рік тому +1

    I would like to see the 96 corvette lt4 engine.

  • @jasonbailey8960
    @jasonbailey8960 2 роки тому +1

    I am here ✋️ sbc fan 👍

  • @micahsweetenberg6429
    @micahsweetenberg6429 Рік тому +1

    I tried telling people for years that the lt1 made more power then what GM was claiming!!!

  • @ericshere03
    @ericshere03 2 роки тому +1

    I’d like to the the GEN2 LT-4 … factory rated at 330hp, however word in the street is that it was de rated on paper to make room for the LS1 …
    It’s actually impressive what those old engines did on iron heads, flat cams, poor head design and on one case the hood old quadrajet …

  • @1967davethewave
    @1967davethewave 2 роки тому +11

    Does the LT4 make much more power than a standard LT1? I know they had a hotter cam and slightly better heads and intake. I had a customer for years that had 2 LT4 Corvettes and I was impressed in the 1990's by them. One was built by Doug Rippie though and was a 383. It was the only C4 Corvette that would keep up with the later C5 and C6 cars!

    • @willstikken5619
      @willstikken5619 2 роки тому +9

      I was thinking the same thing. The 96 LT4 should be the highest performance small block before the LS1. I know an LT4 powered C4 corvette would hang with an early LS1 C5.

    • @fortier2727
      @fortier2727 2 роки тому +3

      LT1 300hp, LT4 330hp. LT4 has better heads, and intake, really needs hot cam and headers. Both need coil on plug conversion, optispark sucks.

    • @Val_Killmore
      @Val_Killmore 2 роки тому

      Maybe he can add an lt4 in with the mix of the ls6 vs lt5.

    • @GORILLA_PIMP
      @GORILLA_PIMP 6 місяців тому

      ​@@fortier2727
      Any engine with that optispark design is trash
      Period

  • @jacksonbermingham2168
    @jacksonbermingham2168 2 роки тому +1

    when you do these comparisons can at end of video after you sign off put the dyno comparison ultimate chart up for 5 or 10 seconds

  • @Hapkido82AUS
    @Hapkido82AUS 2 роки тому +1

    I'm thinking the (405hp net) LT5 would be around 460- 470hp with a custom tune, measured this way?
    Can't wait to find out ☺

  • @brianjanusek4356
    @brianjanusek4356 2 роки тому +1

    So, what kind of power can the lt1 make with port fuel injection?

  • @FMChimera
    @FMChimera 2 роки тому +1

    I had an LT1 '70 'vette and it came from the factory with a Q-jet. It also had factory air, despite the fact you "couldn't get AC on one". Car was last in PA and still has less than 50k on it...

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 роки тому

      LT1 in 1970 did not come with Q-Jet

    • @lindas1st
      @lindas1st 2 роки тому

      @@richardholdener1727 wasnt it rated at 370 hp in the Vette and the 360 number comes from the Camaro Z28 I believe.

    • @FMChimera
      @FMChimera 2 роки тому

      @@richardholdener1727 Yep, been hearing that for 50 years. Also didn't come with AC. Except, of course, if you ordered it that way from a buddy who owned a big-ass GM dealership...

    • @FMChimera
      @FMChimera 2 роки тому

      Had a '73 Montego MX, too; couldn't be had in triple black. Didn't come in a 351W/FMX combo, especially not with limited slip 2.8 geared rear...except mine did.
      Point being back before you were born the factory would equip anything they had any way you wanted, if it existed in their line and you had the cash...and a dealer who knew what boxes to check.

  • @alonzahanks1182
    @alonzahanks1182 2 місяці тому +1

    and will bigger injectors help?
    Whats realy the Best cam for LT1 ?

  • @alonzahanks1182
    @alonzahanks1182 3 місяці тому +1

    The Gen 2 LT1 was jipped The LS1 had Factory 1.6 roller rockers
    and got 5oo lift cam
    Id like to see the stock LT1 with 1.6 rollor rockers
    vs LS1

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 місяці тому

      LS motors have 1.7 rockers and much better heads and intake and windage tray etc...

    • @alonzahanks1182
      @alonzahanks1182 3 місяці тому

      lol I just think the LT1 has unfinished Business lol
      wasnt the lt1 in this a smaller than 4 inch bore?
      I think LS is a very cool Race car engine .
      But my 97 camaro Z28 6 speed hasnt lost to any of the LS Family
      But I havnt ran any Boosted ones I dont think .
      The ford Airfoil mind trick didnt work on me lol
      It takes a lot to Beat a 11 flat second car
      Running stock exaust port matched and hogged out manifolds
      lol
      They got short changed on compression
      and later on weight
      it will take a realy expensive head and cam package to beat my lt1
      lol
      The NHRA Stocker record for 97 camaro Z28 6 speed
      is 10.730 google it lol

  • @alonzahanks1182
    @alonzahanks1182 2 місяці тому +1

    my 97 Z28 won Grudge night Against about every High horse Engine there is
    even the local Race cars lol
    And it did it through Stock exaust Manifolds lol no cats though
    I think the thinner casting 561 heads are way faster like 400 horse
    usually winning by 8-9 car lengths against the all the LS clan
    a lot of it is Driver skill but the other half is Definately Engine

  • @number3665
    @number3665 2 роки тому +1

    Have you ever gotten to compare the numbers of a Pontiac Ram Air III engine vs the Ram Air IV engine? I always wondered exactly what they made and just how far apart in power they actually were in stock configuration.

  • @voltagefreak6350
    @voltagefreak6350 2 роки тому +1

    Reference: Purple sage/ 350 chevy should have made

  • @shawnbauman5463
    @shawnbauman5463 2 роки тому +5

    LT4 versus LS1.... you'd be surprised.

  • @joeyjojojr.shabadoo915
    @joeyjojojr.shabadoo915 2 роки тому +1

    5.7 Hemi vs 5.7L LS1 would also be a great comparison.

  • @EGGINFOOLS
    @EGGINFOOLS 2 роки тому +5

    Great video. LT4 was 330hp. Wonder where it falls in this line up

    • @Hapkido82AUS
      @Hapkido82AUS 2 роки тому

      Probably close to 400hp measured this way, and with headers and tune

    • @GORILLA_PIMP
      @GORILLA_PIMP 6 місяців тому

      That 400 is with headers an tune
      Not stock
      Thus that 400 wouldn't count in a legitimate comparison
      Perhaps you should pay attention better

  • @trumpisaconfirmedcuck5840
    @trumpisaconfirmedcuck5840 2 роки тому +2

    SB 2.2... is king of the 5.7 liters.

  • @guyderagisch4964
    @guyderagisch4964 2 роки тому +1

    What about the one year only LT-4?

  • @kyle8380
    @kyle8380 19 днів тому +1

    LS6 is king of pushrod 5.7

  • @alonzahanks1182
    @alonzahanks1182 2 місяці тому +1

    The Ls6 manafold was about 40 extra horse
    Just a Edebrock high rise added 20 horse on old 350
    Wheres the push rods High Ram HA HA
    The LS6 Didnt Come out for 10 years lol after LS
    the LT1 rockers were same as old 350 Advertised at 1.5 ratio
    But were actualy 1.324 And ment to be a full roller engine
    That would put lt1 cam at 506 and 520 lift evening up the the LS1 cam
    1st a set of crane gold 1.5 roller rockers
    cause its lift x rocker ratio is actual lift
    the actual specs on lt1 heads were 177 intake and 75 ccs exaust
    Yup They actually exeeded the advertised runner lol
    port match the intake ,heads and exaust and push the port match through intake runner
    pinch point and round golf ball bit the floor of intake runner a hole every quarter inch
    And drill the 4 mm hole in bottom of Throttle body to 6 mm
    or find the 96-97 561 heads thinner casting 200 on ebay lol
    and run 1.5 crane gold roller rockers
    and drill the 4mm to 6mm hole in throttle body .
    cause the little throttle body is maxed 48 actualy with the hole 52 mm
    making it 54 thats 50 more cfm at 6000 rpm .
    Thats just what I call a Tune up vs your LS6 high Ram and let titans Slug it out
    make a great video
    or are you going to desert the LT1 just like chevy did
    You wild up every engine you touch But you Tip toe around the LT1 Richard Holdener
    The last of The Push Rod Chevy Small Block The most Famous 350 LT1 Vette ENGINE
    Are you Feeling Guilty Richard Holdener?
    Shame Shame LOL

  • @michaelallen2501
    @michaelallen2501 2 роки тому +5

    C4 LT4 vs C5 LS6.

    • @michaelallen2501
      @michaelallen2501 2 роки тому

      So what do you say Richard?! Is this a doable comparison?

  • @edwardwood3622
    @edwardwood3622 Рік тому +1

    The 70 LT1 should have made more power and reved higher than the L46 considering the bigger cam and better intake.

  • @samholcombe3129
    @samholcombe3129 2 роки тому +1

    I’d say LS6 if you mean production engines

  • @kurrentevent
    @kurrentevent 2 роки тому +1

    I'm trying see what can combo's I can throw at an gen 2 without changing to much

  • @karlsracing8422
    @karlsracing8422 2 роки тому +1

    Finally not an Ls! Damn! I haven't watched any videos. But still chevy oh well.

  • @michaelmcdowell3092
    @michaelmcdowell3092 2 роки тому +1

    You have pictured as an L-46 350/350 is an L-82 350/320, Quadrant carb and iron intake.
    The L-82 in 1973 was cammed the same with good heads. I lived and ran these motors, contact me, I can help!

  • @craigsixta983
    @craigsixta983 2 роки тому +1

    I would like to see the old 350s run on 100 octane like we had back in the day.

  • @sinistersilverado965
    @sinistersilverado965 2 роки тому +2

    what about the LT4

  • @albertgaspar627
    @albertgaspar627 2 роки тому +1

    the old ZR-1 King of the Hill DOHC 350's were not Chevy motors, they were Mercury Marine, so there's an out for not including it here :)

  • @louisevillebrun3854
    @louisevillebrun3854 20 днів тому +1

    1994 Buick roadmasters 🎉 😊

  • @leematson8484
    @leematson8484 2 роки тому +1

    Holy crap-where did you find a LT5 not still in a car?!

    • @allanb3222
      @allanb3222 2 роки тому +1

      I'm sure one of his buddies at westech has one!

  • @jasonkepic1132
    @jasonkepic1132 7 місяців тому +1

    What!?
    The stock LS1 made what!?

  • @madhatterz28
    @madhatterz28 2 роки тому +2

    How about LT4 vs LS6?