"from these gray dust bunnies on the less decorative side of the sword, we can tell that the owner likely kept the sword on the floor under her desk, in the corner"...
@Pure Rust 1500yrs is such a tiny amount of time. Im sure humans will be alright. I would say that 1500 million years is a bit better number for human extinction.
No wonder it's her favorite. It's as close to time travel as we can get. This warrior wrote us a message 1500 years ago and upon reading it in the proper context we get to relive his life in our imagination. This is the kind of stuff that makes history real and reminds us that these ancient people were just us in a different time
leftyfourguns - "these ancient people were just us in a different time." Excellent observation ! (Just as 'Old People' are merely Young People who've been around a little longer)
There is something you expect to be drastically different about people 'back then', it's your brain's fantasy trying to fill in the gaps i guess. But when you see/read these old interviews you realise that people still were just people back then :p But you frased it better
I think about a warrior dying long ago, yet having his thoughts and feelings a analyzed by someone like Sue ages and centuries later. The life has faded but that one rune preserved a piece of his thoughts, his soul to this day that now lives in all of our minds. Very powerful.
Oh that would be great. “ROgueOne has a distinctive horizontal wrinkle on his forehead, probably indicative of aggravation from his kids. And here we see pattern baldness, very typical of the period and of this location. Even through preservation, we can see that his left arm was darker than his right. That would indicate dating of 1960’s or earlier because it was common among people who drove long distances but whose vehicles didn’t have air conditioning. If ROgueOne lived later than that, it would be an indication that he couldn’t afford vehicular air conditioning.”
Wow this is easily my favorite Curator's Corner by far, I loved the passion you can tell she has for these things and the history the swords themselves exude.
@@SimonWoodburyForget - I don't know if you noticed the name of the channel; it's the British Museum curator's channel, not the "Amaze Jaded Simon" channel. Some people!
@@SimonWoodburyForget UA-cam and this entire world are not in fact here to please you. The only reason anybody cares about you is...I don't know. Perhaps your mother cares, but certainly not anyone else.
One of the lines in the Havamal, an old Norse poem (not the same culture, but certainly related,) is "mæki, er reyndr er," "praise no weapon until tried."
Anglo Saxon and Danish lords are often described as "ring givers". I had always thought this meant they gave expensive finger rings as rewards and bribes. The information about the rings on the swords would indicate a ring giver was someone who inspired loyalty bound by oaths, which seems much more heroic than someone just doling out trinkets as gifts.
They're arm rings, definitely. This is well recorded in the Anglo Saxon chronicles as well as Scandinavian texts. It boils down to this:- the better, more successful warrior you are, the wealthier your lord or Jarl makes you.
forty mike mike The curator's corner suggested that they were rings attached to the cross piece of the sword. But perhaps there were two different rings involved.
@@mikemiller1646 Or perhaps it really has nothing to do with it and rings on the pommel served another purpose, if they were practical at all (maybe for a lanyard)
I first ran into honoring wear and tear of older items in my youth in the American west. One of the few jobs available to rural youth was "bucking hay", that is loading hay bails in the field onto wagons to be transported to hay yards. In that profession, we all wore haying chaps (pronounced sh-a-ps) to protect our legs. These were hard-worn utility items that were handed down father to son. Often repaired with heavy crude patches. You could tell a lot about someone's experience (or family back ground) by the chaps they wore. My own were third-generation chaps, ugly, stained and worn, but gave me instant acceptance on my first day of the job. Fifty years later, I am still using them and have added a few repairs of my own. Doubt I will be buried with them though. So when you talked about the wear and tear and the non-compatible decorations/repairs, it made a lot of sense to me.
I agree about the pommel wear - it is a comfortable place to rest the hand and gives one a manly posture - one doesn't mess around with a bloke who has his hand on his sword. I have to say that my instant reaction when seeing the ring on the pommel was that this was for a wrist loop. As you say, there are a number of explanations for these rings appearing on pommels of this period, but I am reminded of Egil's Saga (chapter 60 in the 1893 translation into English by W. C. Green, from the original Icelandic 'Egils saga SkallagrÃmssonar'), which mentions that Egil wound the cord attached to the hilt of his sword around his arm and let the sword hang, so that he could handle his 'halberd' ('kesja' - a spear, or similar?) easily, while keeping the sword readily available. Lodging the pole weapon in Bergonund's ('Berg-Önundur's') shield, he was quickly able to retrieve his sword and despatch his opponent before the latter could draw his. A lanyard is jolly useful in preventing loss of a weapon during combat, e.g. modern military pistols are generally fitted with a lanyard ring. Well, it's just a theory and then there's another point - why didn't all swords of this period have rings fitted? Also, there's the use of friðbönd (peace straps) to fix the sword in the scabbard so that it could not be drawn where this was forbidden... could these be attached to the rings? I am, I admit, making reference to Viking period Sagas (Egil was a Norwegian) not Anglo-Saxon practices, but since both enjoyed beating each other up on a fairly regular basis, it's at least a possibility! Anyway, thank you so much, Sue, for a really fascinating video!
As she indicates it's not conclusively known at this time, but one indication that these rings may not have been used practically as you suggest is that as this ring adornment motif progresses over time the rings morph into more symbolic forms. The two rings become fused and the center open area that makes them actual rings disappears until you have what is essentially two fat disc shapes that intersect at right angles (disc-and-a-half actually). This would tend to imply that the rings were never meant to have anything pass through them, such as a cord, or the functional aspect would have been retained. The fact that the rings were symbolically retained would also address the issue of " why didn't all swords of this period have rings fitted?", since as she stated in the video it was possibly a symbol of fealty which not every warrior would posses.
In all seriousness, Mr Hall, Wow! I am hugely impressed with your thoughts. This was my first time hearing Dr Brunning talk, and her knowledge and obvious love of the topic are wonderful.
My first thought was also that it might be a lanyard ring. But on closer inspection, it doesn't make much sense. The ring or loop protruding from the pommel pretty much fills up the space inside the ring, and the ring fills up the space inside the loop. This doesn't leave room for any cord of substantial thickness. Proper lanyard rings have all or most of the hole in the ring available for a cord to be tied or clipped in. As it is, the pommel loop would serve as an anchor point of a lanyard without the ring there at all. So I believe Sue is right in that it has some ceremonial purpose, either to show fealty to a lord or some religious meaning. But then again, it might just be bling. The reference to "kesja" is a curious one. There are several references to pole arms with both tip and cutting edge under different names, such as kesja, høggspjut or atgeir in norse and islandic sagas. But there is no archaeological evidence of any such weapons in use by the norse. Spear heads found have all been of diamond cross section used for thrusting or throwing, and axes were single edged with no spikes for thrusting. Some references are from after the viking age, so it's quite possible later period weapons were referenced. Or that a few such weapons made their way to Scandinavia from foreign countries. The vikings travelled far and wide, and assimilated much from the cultures they encountered.
I think one has to consider the blacksmiths perspektive, the first time a ring was added was (most likely) just to try it out and when people started to use them and want them, whatever for, they kept making them, so people put ornate rings in there or a wristband or tassets or maybe a rope to throw the sword. Whatever go crazy the ring is already there so you may as well use it. In Conclusion (mine atleast) the rings are there because no blacksmith knows what everybody wants, they just put a ring on it and nobody complaint about it.
This past summer I had the unbelievable pleasure and privilege of being part of a group that Dr. Brunning guided through the BM's Sutton Hoo collection as well as sharing her passion for swords and their importance in Anglo-Saxon society.
Sue reminded me of the woman who speaks for the Field Museum in Chicago. Sue is a particularly articulate presenter. Very informative and a delight to hear from someone who is both enthusiastic, deeply knowledgeable, and articulate. British Museum, you would be well served to have her present on more of her favorite topics. Well done indeed.
Dr Brunning, or as I’d like to call her; Sutton Hoo Sue, is so knowledgeable and a fantastic presenter! It’s no easy task to make historic objects as fascinating as she does!
Beautiful and honest, isn't it? Reminds me of how the oak was seen and worshiped historically in my home country Germany. It's still somewhat of a symbol for durability or even imperishableness today. We don't give trees nearly enough credit and respect nowadays, imho.
Bassalicious Y’all Germans just love wood. All of your wooden stuff tends to be high quality. Even your Christmas ornaments. It’s like y’all see a piece of wood on one of the million hiking trails you have and go “that’s a nice piece. I think I’ll make a crescent moon out of it”
I loved this video, I must admit I thought they buried them with "fancy" goods but it is interesting that these weapons where not treasures but personal and important to the warrior.
I also would like to see more about her corner of the museum. I'd be very pleased if she were to review my sword as well; a very personal piece, it also stands strong like an ash tree.
I have to admit, I like swords and stories about them. I especially like how she showed how the wear on that pommel came from years of resting a hand on it in that way. Amazing to think that over 1,000 years ago, that sword was some important person's most prized possession. Now you hold it in your hand.
@@DavidSmith-ss1cg I would also surmise that some of the wear was from use where the pommel also rubbed against the glove or bare hand of the wielder as I have found occurs with wielding a sword.
As a history student one of the most important lessons I have learned was: if you really get into subjects, they become interesting even if they weren't (to you) in the first place.
I love the Curators Corner! It is a wealth of knowledge in a few minutes. Your Curators are so passionate about each item that it is such a pleasure to watch them. Thank you for them sharing their expertise.
Thank you so much for this wonderful lesson! History becomes so much more tangible if it’s possible to show that an artifact is not just an old dead item, but once was used by a real person. That’s what I would call “living history”.
I am an Anglo-Saxon re-enactor, and some years ago I wore a copy of the Sutton Hoo helm for some filming at West Stow Anglo-Saxon village. Not only is it heavy- it gets hot very quickly! Fighting with period weapons is quite strenuous, and in the Sutton Hoo helmet the heat has nowhere to go but up! Also, as Sue notes, your senses are restricted- forward vision is OK, but you have very little peripheral vision- and if you cast your eyes down you cannot see your own feet! Hearing is also very limited. Great for a pitched battle (apart from the possible heat exhaustion), or if you have bodyguards, but limiting in a fast-moving skirmish. The Coppergate or Woolaston helmets have a bit less protection, but are more practical. Another thing to consider is that for the earlier Anglo-Saxons, kings were marked not by a crown, but a helmet: as late as the 9th century coins show kings in helmets, not crowns.
@@johnmayer3433 That is possible- although I have been advised that John Mortimer's copy of the Sutton Hoo helm (a better reconstruction than the BM one!) has better peripheral vision than I experienced. Another aspect of the helm recently discovered by Mortimer is that the left and right eyes would have looked different: garnets in AS jewel-work usually have a diaper-cut gold foil behind, to make them reflect. One eye has the diaper cut, one is plain- so it would have seemed less bright. This is almost certainly not accidental, but relates to the one-eyed god Woden (the Norse Odin). So was the Sutton Hoo helm just ceremonial? Possibly, but the majority of surviving early medieval helms are decorated: in the case of the Staffordshire Hoard helm (reconstructed from fragments of the gold sheathing, the iron does not survive) as richly as Sutton Hoo- if not more so. There is ample evidence, largely from swords, of richly decorated items that are nonetheless quite functional. Bejewelled war-gear was a statement on the battlefield, as well as in the hall.
Loved so much about this video. So engaging, filled with knowledge, hands on history, presented with so much passion but respectful. This was so well cut and shot - the facts were interesting, the presenter so likable. I could listen do this for a lot longer. What a great format, thank you, British Museum!
Thanks Sue - I feel very lucky to be living in Australia but able to dip into a couple of one-on-one lessons from the very clever folks at the British Museum in my lunch hour. A lovely introduction to your fascinating job!
Someone who knows that the history of the owner is just as important as the piece that is preserved has my support and respect. Well done to Sue. Your dedication, experience, knowledge, professionalism and genuine interest in learning about history all go into preserving pieces of the tapestry that is the past. Excellent video and very informative. Kudos to the British Museum and Sue.
A great video that is very interesting, What makes it so good is that you can tell Sue has real passion for the subject. Sue is badass, more of Sue, and I like her tattoos.
I did sport fencing for years. Fencers always had their 'favorite' weapons, and they were always the most beat-up ones. The guards (we call them bells) were always beat to shit.
What a beautifully and eloquently presented video, thank you Sue, I love your passion for these historic articles and your articulate way of presenting such, again thank you
I'm sure my username gives me away, but more of this please! The early Anglo-saxon period is murky, yet gives us an incredible insight into a fascinating era. Most people aren't familiar with concepts such as the Heptarchy, Tribal Hidage or remnants of pre-Christian gods/goddesses of England such as Eostre (Easter). I learnt things in this video I never knew before. 10/10 quality video!
A bit over 50 years ago, when the Society for Creative Anachronisms was a harmless bunch of eccentrics, I could stride through the woods of Ann Arbor with my Tizona del Cid. No more.
@@ratpatooti5080 okay that's a dumb counterpoint. If Tesla called to ask Usain Bolt to help sell vehicles, you wouldn't say, "maybe don't try selling a car to people that like to sprint." You still get from point A to point B, except one option is going to enhance that experience...and you can still sprint whenever you want.
Fascinating the way and the semplicity you do explain things, this is elegance and spiritual beauty. Thank you for sharing your deep knowledge of history with us. Greetings
As a knife maker I can really appreciate this and to see how they made it back then, just incredible the maker put a lot of thought in the making of this sword... thanks Sue this was a cool learning experience !
This is a wonderful series, You bring the period and the artifacts to life very well. The idea of swords meaning nothing but business is very powerful, thanks. I remember a talk given by Paul Gething several years ago about the Bamburgh sword and the astonishing psychological effect of a combatant seeing a sword like this coming towards them in Anglo-Saxon warfare, the knowledge of the level of skill of the sword wielder and the way swords were acquired meaning they were so far outclassed in skill, strength and knowledge that whatever polearm they were holding was worse than useless.
Loved this video and impressed with your knowledge of swords. Just wanted to mention one type of pommel and ask a related question. The Scythians and Sarmatians usually, or frequently used a sword with a ring as part of the pommel. These are found across Asia and eastern Europe, going back at least three millennia. Are you familiar with these? My interest is that there was a related tribe, that I understand never left the Altai that was known as master metalsmiths. They had made swords of superior. manufacture and metallurgy, and I was surprised to see a couple of mentions of one found somewhere in northern Britain in recent years in a burial that was remarkably intact. The report mentioned that it was probably made by the tribe known as Kalibers, or Calibars, or similar. Are you familiar with this find, these swords, or this tribe? Extremely little on the net about this, but it is where I saw reference to the burial.
Paul Glynn many Sarmatians served as mercenaries for the Romans if I recall correctly, and the Alani tribes travelled west during the Germanic Migration Period. Then again, maybe it was a holdover tradition among Nordic peoples from their Indo-Aryan roots.
Ring pommels are such a wide spread phenomenon that we can not automatically assume they are connected in any way. We find ring swords as far east as China and Japan. the earliest ring pommel that I am aware of is on a dagger from Egypt dated to the first half of the second century. The ring pommels in use in Europe seems to have developed from the antennae swords of late bronze/early iron age. Some stone age flint daggers from Europe and obsidian daggers from the Americas have handles made to resemble entwined and twisting snakes, creating a loop at the pommel end. But I don't count these as ring pommels as such.
I’ve now watched (all?) three of your UA-cam presentations. They are all very good and extremely instructive, thank you. Especially thank you for the message about grey hairs and older age! I was brought up near Chatham, so was close to Faversham, and didn’t know about such artefacts being local. Again, thank you Sue. Les Austin
marius schoenmaker seems the legend is rather Celtic, so, either a sword in the leaf pattern style, or antennae sword... if very late, a spatha, obviously resembling the Germanic style, since many implements at use by the Romans in the last period, were introduced to the artistic and artisan currents of the Germanic tribes during those years, resulting in the works that we have found of the migration period
Now I’m super curious - what sort of symbol would a curator of Anglo Saxon artifacts, one who is familiar with runes and other ancient symbols, choose to have tattooed on her inner forearm?
She's got tat's on both her forearms, but yeah they are hard to make out. On her right arm it looks like maybe a heart, while her left arm tat looks more circular, but can't see it well enough...
The pommel wear explanation implies there was a correct "front" and "back" to a sword, but these swords were generally symmetrical weren't they? Why would the wearer have constantly sheathed the sword in the same orientation?
So the sword lives in a sheath, which is more often than not attached to a belt. Imagine you're dressing, you pop your belt on and your sheath is already attached, so there's a clear way to put it on which does nto flip the sowrd's hilt over. Now imagine you're drawing the sword, you pull it out with your right hand and you then do whatever you're going to do with it, in most cases unless you drop the sword you're going to return it to the sheath with the pummel still facing in the same direction (as it is the comfortable way to do so) I'd argue that in the day to day use of a sword there's really no reason for the hilt to be flipped as most of the opportunities forflipping can happen there's and ergonomic reason why it usually doesn't. Of course, I'm sure exceptions apply.
Sue is a very good presenter.
I concur with this statement.
Shame she isnt presenting more videos
She also adorable. imo.
Translation: shes really hot
And she can cleave you from shoulder to hip with her favorite blade.
1500yrs from now someone will find a foam sword remains somewhere and study it.
1500 yrs from now they will dig up a blunted butter knife in London, and laugh out loud.
@Pure Rust I bet you're great at parties.
mining the great pacific garbage continent
"from these gray dust bunnies on the less decorative side of the sword, we can tell that the owner likely kept the sword on the floor under her desk, in the corner"...
@Pure Rust 1500yrs is such a tiny amount of time. Im sure humans will be alright. I would say that 1500 million years is a bit better number for human extinction.
No wonder it's her favorite. It's as close to time travel as we can get. This warrior wrote us a message 1500 years ago and upon reading it in the proper context we get to relive his life in our imagination. This is the kind of stuff that makes history real and reminds us that these ancient people were just us in a different time
leftyfourguns -
"these ancient people were just us in a different time."
Excellent observation !
(Just as 'Old People' are merely Young People who've been around a little longer)
@@nateman10 nice bro i read all that
There is something you expect to be drastically different about people 'back then', it's your brain's fantasy trying to fill in the gaps i guess. But when you see/read these old interviews you realise that people still were just people back then :p But you frased it better
you are me from 4 months ago. ;-) (i also think people haven't changed much mentally in 30,000 thousand years.)
aren't dumb people smart people before they grew out of being dumb? @@marvinc999
“This is my sword, there are many like it but this one’s mine” an Anglo Saxon soldier probably
more visits to Sue's corner please! Anglo saxon history is my favourite :D.
I think about a warrior dying long ago, yet having his thoughts and feelings a analyzed by someone like Sue ages and centuries later. The life has faded but that one rune preserved a piece of his thoughts, his soul to this day that now lives in all of our minds. Very powerful.
I love Sue. She has such a passion for history that it is infectious. I already love history but Sue just makes it that bit extra special. Thanks Sue.
I wish someone would look at me the way Sue looks at that sword....
Bruh
LOL :)
Oh that would be great. “ROgueOne has a distinctive horizontal wrinkle on his forehead, probably indicative of aggravation from his kids. And here we see pattern baldness, very typical of the period and of this location. Even through preservation, we can see that his left arm was darker than his right. That would indicate dating of 1960’s or earlier because it was common among people who drove long distances but whose vehicles didn’t have air conditioning. If ROgueOne lived later than that, it would be an indication that he couldn’t afford vehicular air conditioning.”
I wish Sue would look at me the way she looks at that sword.
Wow this is easily my favorite Curator's Corner by far, I loved the passion you can tell she has for these things and the history the swords themselves exude.
@@SimonWoodburyForget - I don't know if you noticed the name of the channel; it's the British Museum curator's channel, not the "Amaze Jaded Simon" channel. Some people!
@@SimonWoodburyForget His point is your jaded and expect the world to please you like a spoilt child seems pretty clear tbh nevermind accurate.
@@SimonWoodburyForget Don't need to...it's not shit.
@@SimonWoodburyForget UA-cam and this entire world are not in fact here to please you. The only reason anybody cares about you is...I don't know. Perhaps your mother cares, but certainly not anyone else.
@@SimonWoodburyForget Did you intend that as a threat? Careful how you answer...your account is at risk.
That connection with the rune poem at the end is a great detail; one of the most interesting Curator's Corners yet
Sue is an absolute natural at presenting and has a great teaching style. Great videos.
One of the lines in the Havamal, an old Norse poem (not the same culture, but certainly related,) is "mæki, er reyndr er," "praise no weapon until tried."
I was thinking this too!
It's solid advice.
"Beware the old man, in a place where men die young."
Havamal, "The sayings of the High Ones" ie The Gods.
Anglo Saxon and Danish lords are often described as "ring givers". I had always thought this meant they gave expensive finger rings as rewards and bribes. The information about the rings on the swords would indicate a ring giver was someone who inspired loyalty bound by oaths, which seems much more heroic than someone just doling out trinkets as gifts.
Mike Miller and a possible root to our marriage ceremonies. A person swears lifelong service to someone and is rewarded by an imperishable ring.
They're arm rings, definitely. This is well recorded in the Anglo Saxon chronicles as well as Scandinavian texts. It boils down to this:- the better, more successful warrior you are, the wealthier your lord or Jarl makes you.
forty mike mike The curator's corner suggested that they were rings attached to the cross piece of the sword. But perhaps there were two different rings involved.
@@mikemiller1646 Or perhaps it really has nothing to do with it and rings on the pommel served another purpose, if they were practical at all (maybe for a lanyard)
@@ap6531 /salute on that, that's why they attach it to bicycles then. Fantastic.
I like the way she cuts through to to the heart of the topic!
Another guy took a stab at it but he didn't have the chops.
That may be, but we're no match for your side-splitting wit!
I first ran into honoring wear and tear of older items in my youth in the American west. One of the few jobs available to rural youth was "bucking hay", that is loading hay bails in the field onto wagons to be transported to hay yards. In that profession, we all wore haying chaps (pronounced sh-a-ps) to protect our legs. These were hard-worn utility items that were handed down father to son. Often repaired with heavy crude patches. You could tell a lot about someone's experience (or family back ground) by the chaps they wore. My own were third-generation chaps, ugly, stained and worn, but gave me instant acceptance on my first day of the job. Fifty years later, I am still using them and have added a few repairs of my own. Doubt I will be buried with them though. So when you talked about the wear and tear and the non-compatible decorations/repairs, it made a lot of sense to me.
I agree about the pommel wear - it is a comfortable place to rest the hand and gives one a manly posture - one doesn't mess around with a bloke who has his hand on his sword. I have to say that my instant reaction when seeing the ring on the pommel was that this was for a wrist loop. As you say, there are a number of explanations for these rings appearing on pommels of this period, but I am reminded of Egil's Saga (chapter 60 in the 1893 translation into English by W. C. Green, from the original Icelandic 'Egils saga SkallagrÃmssonar'), which mentions that Egil wound the cord attached to the hilt of his sword around his arm and let the sword hang, so that he could handle his 'halberd' ('kesja' - a spear, or similar?) easily, while keeping the sword readily available. Lodging the pole weapon in Bergonund's ('Berg-Önundur's') shield, he was quickly able to retrieve his sword and despatch his opponent before the latter could draw his. A lanyard is jolly useful in preventing loss of a weapon during combat, e.g. modern military pistols are generally fitted with a lanyard ring. Well, it's just a theory and then there's another point - why didn't all swords of this period have rings fitted? Also, there's the use of friðbönd (peace straps) to fix the sword in the scabbard so that it could not be drawn where this was forbidden... could these be attached to the rings? I am, I admit, making reference to Viking period Sagas (Egil was a Norwegian) not Anglo-Saxon practices, but since both enjoyed beating each other up on a fairly regular basis, it's at least a possibility! Anyway, thank you so much, Sue, for a really fascinating video!
Severely underrated comment!
As she indicates it's not conclusively known at this time, but one indication that these rings may not have been used practically as you suggest is that as this ring adornment motif progresses over time the rings morph into more symbolic forms. The two rings become fused and the center open area that makes them actual rings disappears until you have what is essentially two fat disc shapes that intersect at right angles (disc-and-a-half actually). This would tend to imply that the rings were never meant to have anything pass through them, such as a cord, or the functional aspect would have been retained. The fact that the rings were symbolically retained would also address the issue of " why didn't all swords of this period have rings fitted?", since as she stated in the video it was possibly a symbol of fealty which not every warrior would posses.
In all seriousness, Mr Hall, Wow! I am hugely impressed with your thoughts. This was my first time hearing Dr Brunning talk, and her knowledge and obvious love of the topic are wonderful.
My first thought was also that it might be a lanyard ring. But on closer inspection, it doesn't make much sense. The ring or loop protruding from the pommel pretty much fills up the space inside the ring, and the ring fills up the space inside the loop. This doesn't leave room for any cord of substantial thickness. Proper lanyard rings have all or most of the hole in the ring available for a cord to be tied or clipped in. As it is, the pommel loop would serve as an anchor point of a lanyard without the ring there at all. So I believe Sue is right in that it has some ceremonial purpose, either to show fealty to a lord or some religious meaning. But then again, it might just be bling.
The reference to "kesja" is a curious one. There are several references to pole arms with both tip and cutting edge under different names, such as kesja, høggspjut or atgeir in norse and islandic sagas. But there is no archaeological evidence of any such weapons in use by the norse. Spear heads found have all been of diamond cross section used for thrusting or throwing, and axes were single edged with no spikes for thrusting. Some references are from after the viking age, so it's quite possible later period weapons were referenced. Or that a few such weapons made their way to Scandinavia from foreign countries. The vikings travelled far and wide, and assimilated much from the cultures they encountered.
I think one has to consider the blacksmiths perspektive, the first time a ring was added was (most likely) just to try it out and when people started to use them and want them, whatever for, they kept making them, so people put ornate rings in there or a wristband or tassets or maybe a rope to throw the sword. Whatever go crazy the ring is already there so you may as well use it.
In Conclusion (mine atleast) the rings are there because no blacksmith knows what everybody wants, they just put a ring on it and nobody complaint about it.
This past summer I had the unbelievable pleasure and privilege of being part of a group that Dr. Brunning guided through the BM's Sutton Hoo collection as well as sharing her passion for swords and their importance in Anglo-Saxon society.
Congratulations. I hope many more can share such an experience in years to come.
I think nobody is going to be upset about having more of Sue Brunning's corner here.
Sue reminded me of the woman who speaks for the Field Museum in Chicago. Sue is a particularly articulate presenter. Very informative and a delight to hear from someone who is both enthusiastic, deeply knowledgeable, and articulate. British Museum, you would be well served to have her present on more of her favorite topics. Well done indeed.
Dr Brunning, or as I’d like to call her; Sutton Hoo Sue, is so knowledgeable and a fantastic presenter! It’s no easy task to make historic objects as fascinating as she does!
"The ash is extremely tall, prescious to mankind, strong on its base. It holds its ground as it should, although many men attack it."
Beautiful and honest, isn't it? Reminds me of how the oak was seen and worshiped historically in my home country Germany. It's still somewhat of a symbol for durability or even imperishableness today.
We don't give trees nearly enough credit and respect nowadays, imho.
Standing Stout.
@@Bassalicious lol
I don't have any tattoos, but if I was to get one, I'd get the ash rune inked on me somewhere. Nobody's ever attacked me; I just think it's cool.
Bassalicious Y’all Germans just love wood. All of your wooden stuff tends to be high quality. Even your Christmas ornaments. It’s like y’all see a piece of wood on one of the million hiking trails you have and go “that’s a nice piece. I think I’ll make a crescent moon out of it”
I loved this video, I must admit I thought they buried them with "fancy" goods but it is interesting that these weapons where not treasures but personal and important to the warrior.
Thanks Sue. Fascinating. I would love to see more about your corner of the museum.
Is that a euphemism?
I also would like to see more about her corner of the museum. I'd be very pleased if she were to review my sword as well; a very personal piece, it also stands strong like an ash tree.
@@whalebrigade Is it really not possible for male human beings to not sexualize a woman in every context?
😂 yeah I bet you would
I too would be very interested to see more of Sue's corner........
Fascinating!
Jesus Christ, it's Jesus Christ!
Nice to see Jesus has the same inclination for quality education content that I do. What a nice guy that Jesus is
Hope youre doing good Jesus. youre content and life story is really inspirational, and youre one of the most amazing and unique people on this planet
@@zyourzgrandzmaz His lies led to the deaths of hundreds of millions of humans in the last 2000 years.
@@b.jr.7816 I think they're talking about the guy who runs the channel
What I like about this channel is I would have never thought before that Anglo-Saxon sword hilts were a particularly interesting subject.
I have to admit, I like swords and stories about them. I especially like how she showed how the wear on that pommel came from years of resting a hand on it in that way. Amazing to think that over 1,000 years ago, that sword was some important person's most prized possession. Now you hold it in your hand.
it is the small things in history that always carry the big picture within them. which is awesome.
@@DavidSmith-ss1cg I would also surmise that some of the wear was from use where the pommel also rubbed against the glove or bare hand of the wielder as I have found occurs with wielding a sword.
@@karl-dragonstar7958 - Indubitably. Thanks for your thoughtful and polite comment. Merry Christmas!
As a history student one of the most important lessons I have learned was: if you really get into subjects, they become interesting even if they weren't (to you) in the first place.
Swords are always poetic. Wonderful and informative video.
If you carried through the fight of your life, I can see the strong emotional connection.
I love the Curators Corner! It is a wealth of knowledge in a few minutes. Your Curators are so passionate about each item that it is such a pleasure to watch them. Thank you for them sharing their expertise.
I am so pleased there are people who know about wear patterns on anglo-saxon weaponry, and who can share it in such a likeable and interesting manner.
Yes , more of this please ..
Thumbs up for your enthusiasm , there chap
Such interesting stories you can derive from the litlte details of the swords!
god this was a fantastic little video, learned tons and felt totally immersed in her passion about those objects and their history.
Excellent and very well explained. Really puts the swords into a much richer context.
Best curators corner so far. Also such a beautiful lady!
Yeah
What a beautiful and educational video! There is always so much that swords have to teach us
Thank you Sue. Love your passion.
Thank you so much for this wonderful lesson! History becomes so much more tangible if it’s possible to show that an artifact is not just an old dead item, but once was used by a real person. That’s what I would call “living history”.
Just discovered this channel. Couldn't be happier to sub after watching Sue and her knowledge and enthusiasm. Cheers!
I am an Anglo-Saxon re-enactor, and some years ago I wore a copy of the Sutton Hoo helm for some filming at West Stow Anglo-Saxon village. Not only is it heavy- it gets hot very quickly! Fighting with period weapons is quite strenuous, and in the Sutton Hoo helmet the heat has nowhere to go but up! Also, as Sue notes, your senses are restricted- forward vision is OK, but you have very little peripheral vision- and if you cast your eyes down you cannot see your own feet! Hearing is also very limited. Great for a pitched battle (apart from the possible heat exhaustion), or if you have bodyguards, but limiting in a fast-moving skirmish. The Coppergate or Woolaston helmets have a bit less protection, but are more practical. Another thing to consider is that for the earlier Anglo-Saxons, kings were marked not by a crown, but a helmet: as late as the 9th century coins show kings in helmets, not crowns.
Maybe it wasn't meant for battle but for representation. As you said they did not wear crowns back then.
@@johnmayer3433 That is possible- although I have been advised that John Mortimer's copy of the Sutton Hoo helm (a better reconstruction than the BM one!) has better peripheral vision than I experienced. Another aspect of the helm recently discovered by Mortimer is that the left and right eyes would have looked different: garnets in AS jewel-work usually have a diaper-cut gold foil behind, to make them reflect. One eye has the diaper cut, one is plain- so it would have seemed less bright. This is almost certainly not accidental, but relates to the one-eyed god Woden (the Norse Odin). So was the Sutton Hoo helm just ceremonial? Possibly, but the majority of surviving early medieval helms are decorated: in the case of the Staffordshire Hoard helm (reconstructed from fragments of the gold sheathing, the iron does not survive) as richly as Sutton Hoo- if not more so. There is ample evidence, largely from swords, of richly decorated items that are nonetheless quite functional. Bejewelled war-gear was a statement on the battlefield, as well as in the hall.
What a delight to listen to you! Thanks :)
Can't stop watcing. Thanks a lot! Very informative and fun to watch.
Loved so much about this video. So engaging, filled with knowledge, hands on history, presented with so much passion but respectful.
This was so well cut and shot - the facts were interesting, the presenter so likable. I could listen do this for a lot longer.
What a great format, thank you, British Museum!
Thanks Sue - I feel very lucky to be living in Australia but able to dip into a couple of one-on-one lessons from the very clever folks at the British Museum in my lunch hour. A lovely introduction to your fascinating job!
That was phenomenal - you really unlocked the objects, not only in a historical way, but in a philosophical sense as well. Thanks so much for this.
I really love your presentations and this is one of my favorite periods. Love your analysis.
Someone who knows that the history of the owner is just as important as the piece that is preserved has my support and respect. Well done to Sue. Your dedication, experience, knowledge, professionalism and genuine interest in learning about history all go into preserving pieces of the tapestry that is the past. Excellent video and very informative. Kudos to the British Museum and Sue.
A great video that is very interesting, What makes it so good is that you can tell Sue has real passion for the subject.
Sue is badass, more of Sue, and I like her tattoos.
Quite an enjoyable video. Swords are always fascinating, and Dr. Brunnings enthusiasm is infectious.
Could listen to her for hours. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and passion.
Beware of an old man in a profession where the men die young
Thank you for a very informative presentation.
Lovely swords! Thanks Sue!
So interesting. Thank you Sue for making history connect with us.
Marvelous! We want more!
Your deepest wishes gave us what we need ... More knowledge thanks to you
Excellent content, and great presenter. More of her and Anglo Saxon artifacts please!
Please more Sue and more history 🥰 A really great mix i could listen to all day 😊
Superb presentation Sue ! You really brought life and meaning to the swords.
i could listen to her talk all day....
I did sport fencing for years. Fencers always had their 'favorite' weapons, and they were always the most beat-up ones. The guards (we call them bells) were always beat to shit.
What a beautifully and eloquently presented video, thank you Sue, I love your passion for these historic articles and your articulate way of presenting such, again thank you
Brilliant! A truly great presentation about a fasclnating subject! Thank you very much indeed Sue, and the British Museum.
Top tier content!
I’m in love with Sue.
What a joy to listen to----the way History should be presented!!
Marvelous presentation, thank you so much!
I'm sure my username gives me away, but more of this please! The early Anglo-saxon period is murky, yet gives us an incredible insight into a fascinating era. Most people aren't familiar with concepts such as the Heptarchy, Tribal Hidage or remnants of pre-Christian gods/goddesses of England such as Eostre (Easter).
I learnt things in this video I never knew before. 10/10 quality video!
I want to go around in public wearing a sword just so I can rest my hand on the pommel and be lordly.
Well it’s 5 years for a blade longer than 2 inches so i wouldn’t. Im not sure how lordly you will be treated in belmarsh prison 😉
Move to the States, who knows, might be that we soon are left with only swords and bows if we lose the 2nd amendment.
A bit over 50 years ago, when the Society for Creative Anachronisms was a harmless bunch of eccentrics, I could stride through the woods of Ann Arbor with my Tizona del Cid. No more.
@@thisguy4614 If you're trying to get people on your side, I don't think saying we'll have to go around carrying cool swords is the way to do it
@@ratpatooti5080 okay that's a dumb counterpoint. If Tesla called to ask Usain Bolt to help sell vehicles, you wouldn't say, "maybe don't try selling a car to people that like to sprint." You still get from point A to point B, except one option is going to enhance that experience...and you can still sprint whenever you want.
Absolutely brilliant presentation, very informative! Sue is a superb presenter, thank you!
Sue, you're fascinating. So knowledgeable on these artifacts and on history in general. Great job.
I've always loved archaeology and its artifacts.
I find Sue to be incredibly attractive.
Great video! I'm a big fan of this lady.
I love hearing history nerds talk about things that excite them. Exudes positive energy. Thanks!
Excellent presentation and thoroughly enjoyable. I have studied this period but still learned from watching this video.
So freaking smart and cute. Keep it up.
I immediately think of one of my favorite movies, "Highlander".
A very engaging video. Thank you. I love the British Museum and this really brings alive your collection.
Fascinating the way and the semplicity you do explain things, this is elegance and spiritual beauty. Thank you for sharing your deep knowledge of history with us. Greetings
Cute and full of history and knowledge. Would love to spend an evening talking to her.
Why you gotta make it weird homie
@@stover14 What's wierd about wanna have a conversation with a person full of knowledge..? Or is it that she's cute that makes it wierd..?
@@bongfuhrer idk I was pretty drunk when I said that
@@stover14 Stay away from internet when drunk. I learned that years ago..
Sue is a shiny happy person ⚔️
As a knife maker I can really appreciate this and to see how they made it back then, just incredible the maker put a lot of thought in the making of this sword... thanks Sue this was a cool learning experience !
This is a wonderful series, You bring the period and the artifacts to life very well. The idea of swords meaning nothing but business is very powerful, thanks. I remember a talk given by Paul Gething several years ago about the Bamburgh sword and the astonishing psychological effect of a combatant seeing a sword like this coming towards them in Anglo-Saxon warfare, the knowledge of the level of skill of the sword wielder and the way swords were acquired meaning they were so far outclassed in skill, strength and knowledge that whatever polearm they were holding was worse than useless.
When will Sue be reviewing the buster sword?
That would truly be my Final Fantasy.
Loved this video and impressed with your knowledge of swords. Just wanted to mention one type of pommel and ask a related question. The Scythians and Sarmatians usually, or frequently used a sword with a ring as part of the pommel. These are found across Asia and eastern Europe, going back at least three millennia. Are you familiar with these? My interest is that there was a related tribe, that I understand never left the Altai that was known as master metalsmiths. They had made swords of superior. manufacture and metallurgy, and I was surprised to see a couple of mentions of one found somewhere in northern Britain in recent years in a burial that was remarkably intact. The report mentioned that it was probably made by the tribe known as Kalibers, or Calibars, or similar. Are you familiar with this find, these swords, or this tribe? Extremely little on the net about this, but it is where I saw reference to the burial.
Paul Glynn many Sarmatians served as mercenaries for the Romans if I recall correctly, and the Alani tribes travelled west during the Germanic Migration Period. Then again, maybe it was a holdover tradition among Nordic peoples from their Indo-Aryan roots.
Ring pommels are such a wide spread phenomenon that we can not automatically assume they are connected in any way. We find ring swords as far east as China and Japan. the earliest ring pommel that I am aware of is on a dagger from Egypt dated to the first half of the second century. The ring pommels in use in Europe seems to have developed from the antennae swords of late bronze/early iron age. Some stone age flint daggers from Europe and obsidian daggers from the Americas have handles made to resemble entwined and twisting snakes, creating a loop at the pommel end. But I don't count these as ring pommels as such.
Very well presented, excellent job Sue. You certainly know these swords.
Excellent presentation, providing a fascinating insight into the way Saxon life has been recorded around personal artifacts.
I misread the title as "Sue's favourite Anglo-Saxon word".
Could someone please kindly ask her what her favourite Anglo-Saxon word is?
Her favourite Old English word is probably "sweord" or sword.
Great micro lecture. On to BBC Four, Sue!
she'd be brilliant on the Beeb!
Great show sue,loved the topic and you presented it wonderfully.
Superb presentation. Thank you.
Can we have more content from Sue Brunning?
I bet she has killed so many vampires and creatures of the night.
Then she needs to wield something more substantial than a foam sword. :-D
The amount of work she put into this is top-notch
I’ve now watched (all?) three of your UA-cam presentations. They are all very good and extremely instructive, thank you. Especially thank you for the message about grey hairs and older age! I was brought up near Chatham, so was close to Faversham, and didn’t know about such artefacts being local. Again, thank you Sue.
Les Austin
If Excalibur was real it would have looked like a early Anglo-Saxon sword
marius schoenmaker seems the legend is rather Celtic, so, either a sword in the leaf pattern style, or antennae sword... if very late, a spatha, obviously resembling the Germanic style, since many implements at use by the Romans in the last period, were introduced to the artistic and artisan currents of the Germanic tribes during those years, resulting in the works that we have found of the migration period
Give Sue a documentary series on BBC naooow!
Absolutely amazing!
Fantastic curator. Thank you!
Now I’m super curious - what sort of symbol would a curator of Anglo Saxon artifacts, one who is familiar with runes and other ancient symbols, choose to have tattooed on her inner forearm?
Whatever Kim Kardashian says in fashionable today?
I Love Mom?
She's got tat's on both her forearms, but yeah they are hard to make out. On her right arm it looks like maybe a heart, while her left arm tat looks more circular, but can't see it well enough...
I thought maybe bruises. 5:20 for the left, 7:35 for the right.
The pommel wear explanation implies there was a correct "front" and "back" to a sword, but these swords were generally symmetrical weren't they? Why would the wearer have constantly sheathed the sword in the same orientation?
... because it spent more time being worn ceremonially than being unsheathed?
So the sword lives in a sheath, which is more often than not attached to a belt. Imagine you're dressing, you pop your belt on and your sheath is already attached, so there's a clear way to put it on which does nto flip the sowrd's hilt over.
Now imagine you're drawing the sword, you pull it out with your right hand and you then do whatever you're going to do with it, in most cases unless you drop the sword you're going to return it to the sheath with the pummel still facing in the same direction (as it is the comfortable way to do so)
I'd argue that in the day to day use of a sword there's really no reason for the hilt to be flipped as most of the opportunities forflipping can happen there's and ergonomic reason why it usually doesn't. Of course, I'm sure exceptions apply.
Absolutely fascinating and very professional presentation. Well done British Museum/Sue Brunning !
Sue is very articulate, I loved her few videos, I hope she does more