AI & Economy | Dialogues on Technology and Society | Ep 3: | Zanny Minton Beddoes and James Manyika
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 тра 2024
- Renowned economics expert, Zanny Minton Beddoes shares her authoritative perspectives on maximizing the positive benefits of AI to society in a conversation with James Manyika, Google’s SVP of Research, Technology & Society. As the Editor-in-Chief of The Economist, Zanny is at the nexus of the global impacts of technology on productivity and policy.
00:00 - AI’s current inflection point
02:41 - AI’s potential for productivity
03:44 - AI and journalism
06:54 - Addressing risks
09:46 - Diffusion and access
11:36 - Impact on jobs
15:11 - Governance
18:46 - Looking ahead
Watch more Dialogues on Technology and Society: • Dialogues on Technolog...
For more about Responsible AI at Google, visit: publicpolicy.google/responsib...
Subscribe to our Channel: / google
Tweet with us on X: / google
Follow us on Instagram: / google
Join us on Facebook: / google - Наука та технологія
Thank you for sharing this information with us
Very insightful and exciting future. I enjoy all your dialogues with amazing Individuals.
very nice
Are we building these AI models to compete for themselves or they are there to help us up as humans?
Mas que papo nutritivo. Ficou claro que ambos gostaram muito da conversa. Foi como dois amigos conversando livremente. Ignorando câmeras e protocolos.
Excellen James Manyika
Cảm ơn tôi không biết ngoại ngữ các huóng dẫn đăng tải bài viết hãy dùng ngôn ngữ tiêng Việt Nam
Forbid legally Google Maps for terrible results.
سلام ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤
😢 1:30
انا مطلوب الحفاظ على كل معلوماتي
🎉
I have great respect for Mr. Manyika's accolades and contributions to the conversation, but excessive nodding and 'right, right' when the other person is talking does not an enjoyable interview make.
#string
Ai basically creates robots?
Castellano por favor castellano
Happy birthday google 🎉
9
😇😘
😢
Why is she talking over him?
7:20....#2024 make or break towards 2030.#Democracy
Demande argent
google interview? she's too intelligent , i feel like in every interview, she's not allowed to really go at it
Blind optimism about the successes and efficacy of this technology in some of the most vulnerable fields is naivety at best, and reckless disinformation at it's worst. Even as it's described, it counts only the top experts in journalism as valued members of their profession. I don't intend to say that the most vulnerable and creative fields will be able to avoid the cataclysmic shift that AI will inevitably impress upon countless industries. It will. And it isn't likely to be stopped. There were a lot of sour whalers when people found that burning kerosene was an easier way to light your home. A lot of jobs will be replaced by "Ai" and automation. No fighting it. It's happening, and isn't inherently bad. But the way these muppets are trying to explain it to the public, like it's nothing to worry about, and pretending deepfakes and the like are the only threat to communal information is poor and shameful journalism. "Ai" isn't like the ATMs threat to bank tellers. It's a replacing of so many similar jobs. The internet progressed society in many ways and the capacity to rapidly communicate, "Ai" shrinks parts of society to be automated and reduces the need for human cooperation.
Sadly, Google is far behind with AI; they have only recently woken up and are attempting to catch up.
1:32 1:32 1:33 1:33