The plane looks amazing! I just feel like the cabin could use a bit more life. Maybe cabin lighting, Tray coming down like IFly did. I think it would make it feel more realistic than a cold cabin. But honestly, IniBuilds did such an awesome job overall
@@malektalge I think I’m going to do a bit of both. I’m really like the GA/light aircraft in this sim more so than 2020. But our most detailed airliners are without doubt still inn 2020 (for now)
I have the tca captain thrustmaster hotas. I am trying to setup my A320neo V2. I switch my throttle from throttle axis 1 to 100 to just the regular throttle axis’s. But the MFD Menu the configuration is greyed out so I cannot configure anything and use the plane. The engines are at 85% , the speed breaks and parking breaks are off but the plane won’t take off. Anyone know how to fix this issue?
Kinda wild that you could land in all that rain, and see perfectly out of the windshield, with no wipers on. That is clearly broken. Also, no runway lights? I'm guessing they're set by time of day without any reference to the weather conditions. Oops.
all of this improvement, as still simmers go to this. Most simmers never fly to default airports then I assume that MS can never fix everything to everyone's standard The 160 airports that they DID improve greatly should be mentioned. That is a big WOW, much more that lame default airports luckily simmers dontt develop the platform. Or it will be 10 years behind schedule and cost 500 bucks
FSLTL announcement. Said Asobo have locked all the default planes to read only in the config files. Meaning FSLTL cannot change them,. So Asobo not wanting any 3rd party injector changing the default planes. Stuck with trash default AI.
"Our First High Fidelity Airbus A330" Bro... X Plane 12 has had a decent A330 since launch, and it has been getting better and better. Although you don't play much XP so I perfectly understand. But for those who DON'T want to wait in the current 97% waiting queue for MSFS2024 (or for some reason don't wanna upgrade), XP12 has an A330 too, and it's good too. EDIT: Literally seconds after posting this I realised when he said "our" he meant for MSFS. Whoops.
@@valet2972 yeah good point. Only true caveat of the ToLiSS is that the cockpit VFX looks like FSX graphics, and sounds are bad enough (for me) to need a mandatory sound pack.
Problem with someone like INI builds is that they make ok add ons but they are not pmdg level. When INI spews out add on after add on will put the brakes on really good developers make the same add ons cause they will lose some of the market. Not many of you guys understands this. If it is true what I heard way back that milviz planned to make an ATR and they scrubbed the project when asobo/heartman made a half good, half assed ATR they called "expert" level that was never close to expert level. That is a sad thing. Asobo spews out lot of models and they are all only half good.
It's a free aircraft. If your logic is correct, then we would have never gotten the Fenix a320 because of the work of FBW. It's a fantastic free addon, it doesn't need bells and whistles, people know that and are willing to pay money for the ones that do.
you are not wrong. But this A330 is up to the same standard as their a300/A310 in 2020, and those aircraft are at an acceptable level of fidelity. PMDG/FENIX are on a whole other level
@@Fireburnin21its not a free aircraft. its an aircraft paid for by microsoft. that’s the difference. its standard payware quaity, but not ‘study’ level. the fbw aircraft despite being very good, would be considered average if it was a paid addon. the logic is valid as we’ve literally seen it with the ATR. the chance of us getting a fenix/pmdg level a330/a350 is much lower because inibuilds released this.
I’ve never once removed engine covers or pitot static covers as an airline pilot. And I’ve been doing for a long time. Matter of fact the pitot covers/engine covers and gear pins is a maintenance function and needs to be in the log book. Now for the GA aspect I love it, I think it’s great!
backspace key on the keyboard bindings it set to external view. Was driving me crazy yesterday lol
The plane looks amazing! I just feel like the cabin could use a bit more life. Maybe cabin lighting, Tray coming down like IFly did. I think it would make it feel more realistic than a cold cabin. But honestly, IniBuilds did such an awesome job overall
yes ini did a great job with this bird. I heard the other engine variant sounds even better to so ill have to give that a try!
Plane seemed more stable on landing, less wind impact.
it definitely did. Without question I can feel a difference in the aircraft crosswind behavior.
@@V1SimSo is crosswind landing behavior better? The big test is now to see if you need aileron into wind when de crabbing
Can you share the custom camera views?
And how did you move back to cockpit view from outside view? 😮
I feel the planes are "Heavier" in a good way if that makes sense
I want more liveries for the planes included for FS2024
@@V10ne they will come with time for sure!
@V1Sim Yep, career mode in the game can entertain me in the meantime. Otherwise, i'll do a flight with one of the default liviers like inibuids.
I have tried the Adon linker and it works. I just chaned address of folder in community folder.
Are you switching back to 2020?
@@malektalge I think I’m going to do a bit of both. I’m really like the GA/light aircraft in this sim more so than 2020. But our most detailed airliners are without doubt still inn 2020 (for now)
I have the tca captain thrustmaster hotas. I am trying to setup my A320neo V2. I switch my throttle from throttle axis 1 to 100 to just the regular throttle axis’s. But the MFD Menu the configuration is greyed out so I cannot configure anything and use the plane. The engines are at 85% , the speed breaks and parking breaks are off but the plane won’t take off. Anyone know how to fix this issue?
1:01:36 awesome
help me adjust the thrustmaster joystick in msfs 2024
Freedom units baby!
How u liking 2024. U think u will ever go back to 2020 again?
Is it just me or do the main gear wheels look a little big or the struts a little too much together ?
Is it me or it is really in the flight deck? X-Plane 11 style
i cant use reverse thrust aswell, to bad they were in a hurry to lauch the game
@@stiggamer1615 hopefully it will be patched soon. It’s a rough launch no doubt, but let’s give it some time. I think we have something good here.
@@V1Sim I totally agree. The astronomical potential is still there. And it is a matter of logic that sooner or later it will surpass msfs2020
How is the performance, does in run better than 2020 so better fps etc on pc?
hard to say, some times its great, other times its unplayable
2024 is very ram demanding, and cpu bottlenecking is still a problem😢.
They have a long way to go to optimize it. I think too much depends on up and downstream bandwidth so at times it may run fine other times not.
Is there no replay feature with this new game?
There is.
you gotta look and investigate first before asking questions like this
@ i cant even access the game.
I don't like the fact that even in IMC conditions the lights are off how am i supposed to be the FAA's holy baby girl when i cant follow 91.175
The servers are the limit
Can’t wait for A350, not expecting much from the default aircraft.
Kinda wild that you could land in all that rain, and see perfectly out of the windshield, with no wipers on. That is clearly broken. Also, no runway lights? I'm guessing they're set by time of day without any reference to the weather conditions. Oops.
valid
WoW there is no improvement on défaut airports it seems
all of this improvement, as still simmers go to this. Most simmers never fly to default airports
then I assume that MS can never fix everything to everyone's standard
The 160 airports that they DID improve greatly should be mentioned. That is a big WOW, much more that lame default airports
luckily simmers dontt develop the platform. Or it will be 10 years behind schedule and cost 500 bucks
FSLTL announcement. Said Asobo have locked all the default planes to read only in the config files. Meaning FSLTL cannot change them,. So Asobo not wanting any 3rd party injector changing the default planes. Stuck with trash default AI.
@@ganntradingsystemstimecycl2783 really? Sad if true!
"Our First High Fidelity Airbus A330"
Bro... X Plane 12 has had a decent A330 since launch, and it has been getting better and better. Although you don't play much XP so I perfectly understand.
But for those who DON'T want to wait in the current 97% waiting queue for MSFS2024 (or for some reason don't wanna upgrade), XP12 has an A330 too, and it's good too.
EDIT: Literally seconds after posting this I realised when he said "our" he meant for MSFS. Whoops.
@@TheSelected-yb9wq lol well at least you figured out 😉
Laminar’s 330 is nowhere near close to the level of the Ini lol. XP12 now has the Toliss tho
@@valet2972 yeah good point. Only true caveat of the ToLiSS is that the cockpit VFX looks like FSX graphics, and sounds are bad enough (for me) to need a mandatory sound pack.
Problem with someone like INI builds is that they make ok add ons but they are not pmdg level. When INI spews out add on after add on will put the brakes on really good developers make the same add ons cause they will lose some of the market. Not many of you guys understands this. If it is true what I heard way back that milviz planned to make an ATR and they scrubbed the project when asobo/heartman made a half good, half assed ATR they called "expert" level that was never close to expert level. That is a sad thing. Asobo spews out lot of models and they are all only half good.
Or do you just have unbelivable high expectations for default aircraft?
It's a free aircraft. If your logic is correct, then we would have never gotten the Fenix a320 because of the work of FBW. It's a fantastic free addon, it doesn't need bells and whistles, people know that and are willing to pay money for the ones that do.
you are not wrong. But this A330 is up to the same standard as their a300/A310 in 2020, and those aircraft are at an acceptable level of fidelity. PMDG/FENIX are on a whole other level
@@masso392 Well, I don't think you even understood what I was saying but that is allright.
@@Fireburnin21its not a free aircraft. its an aircraft paid for by microsoft. that’s the difference. its standard payware quaity, but not ‘study’ level. the fbw aircraft despite being very good, would be considered average if it was a paid addon. the logic is valid as we’ve literally seen it with the ATR. the chance of us getting a fenix/pmdg level a330/a350 is much lower because inibuilds released this.
If a walkaround is now considered a "game", then it implies that real pilots are also gamers. Good to know
I’ve never once removed engine covers or pitot static covers as an airline pilot. And I’ve been doing for a long time. Matter of fact the pitot covers/engine covers and gear pins is a maintenance function and needs to be in the log book. Now for the GA aspect I love it, I think it’s great!
Got a bit of a laugh from our autistic son that already told me not to bother with 2024 for about a year. He said same as you 😂
Graphics don’t look all that great at all