This GPU alone is what had carried so many people during the pandemic back in 2020 until 2021, but for now in 2023 this GPU falling short not even worth it to buy new better off with an RX 6600 if you're on a seriously low budget
@@olehlemishka5373 are you blind ? thats because it IS not enough, even at low settings 4 and 6gb cards cant even reach 60 fps and newer games minimum vram eats atleast 6-7GB not to mention usually cards that has these Vram are usually bad not powerful enough cards, stop denying
thank u for using low end hardware 2, that is why i folow u. u did alot of gtx 970 vids and 1070ti whilei had those now im looking forward to some of my 3080ti ;)
Como la mia GTX-970 de hace 7 años. En 1080p pero en baja o media,ir claro que va .La nueva que e comprado GTX- 3060 Z todo en ultra 430 euros .Saludos
I think it is weird...my mobile gtx1650ti has more fps in Atomic heart at same setings. I played it 55-70 (mostly 60-62) fps, it is a good optimized game (nowdays we didnt see games like that). but nice video as always :)
I'm surprised it even managed 30fps in some of these games. Anyone that owns a 4gb card like this obviously wouldn't have high expectations of how their games will look & perform. I'm sure the card being based on Turing is carrying it a little too.
2 gb midrange gpu from early PS4 release = 4 gb gpu release around PS5 early life. Same unsatisfaction. I cannot say anything about 8 gb gpu. Take radeon RX 6600 or RX 6700. Both are cheaper below RTX 3060 price tag/msrp. I used to be proud with Radeon RX 570 purchase. Same pricing as GTX 1050 ti with better performance.
Do you have a chance to test Asus Dual RX 5500 XT if you can do it with a processor like 13400f, I would appreciate it. Thanks. Also, since this card is an entry mid-range card, it would be better to test it at 1080p medium for games. 😁😁
@@Eleganttf2 I'm aware of that, but I think if they were to try to run it in dx11 API, it will give a more clear and more accurate presentation at how the next-gen patch will performs in 1650. My 1650 Ti laptop GPU can run this in stable 60fps 90% of the time when in dx11 on mix of low-medium settings with no upscaler, but performance drops significantly to the 30-40fps only when it runs in dx12, even on FSR 2 Quality it still cannot reach 60fps. (I know 1650 Ti is stronger than the base 1650, but my point still stands)
no 1 gpu on steam... meanwhile you can get rx 6600 for the same price or cheaper even thought the cooling on that gpu are sometimes doodoo like biostar version.
same price or cheaper? nah, the 1650 is over $100 cheaper than the cheapest 6600... But I'll give it to you, the GTX 1650 should not be considered an option to buy in 2023. If you have it from years ago? great, it still works. If you need a GPU, forget about the 1650.
I had some of the best memories in the last 3 years with my gtx 1650 laptop but it is not able to run modern games at 60fps so i will be shifting to Asus rog g15 AE next month . RIP GTX 1650
Its because to show the TRUE performance of the 1650 idiot, if he uses an i3 then its not gonna be GPU bound alot of times, he wanna show the max potential of 1650.
@@Eleganttf2 no right in the head individual with functional brain will use gtx1650 with i9 period,if somebody stuck with a low end gpu like this they 100% could give damn about how it will do with a high end cpu,because budget cpu is only option,I dont how it's hard to get common sense level information through your thick bullied all life skull
Games :
Atomic Heart - 0:20
Forza Horizon 5 - 1:27 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Returnal - 2:28
A Plague Tale: Requiem - 3:29
God of War - 4:35 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesGoWPC
Hogwarts Legacy - 5:19 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Horizon Zero Dawn - 6:12 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesH0D
The Last of Us Part I - 7:23
Call of Duty Warzone 2.0 - 8:30
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 9:27- gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
PUBG - 10:28 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesPUBG
Spider-Man Miles Morales - 11:40 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesSpiderManPC
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 12:55 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Sons Of The Forest - 13:56
The Witcher 3 - 15:06 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher
System:
Windows 11
Intel i9 10900K - bit.ly/2YcPUkI
MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - bit.ly/3hsf9Hs
32Gb RAM DDR4 3600Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA
CPU Cooler - Zalman CNPS10X Performa - bit.ly/3f999kE
GeForce GTX 1650 4GB GDDR6 - bit.ly/44XObQA
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Nex test 1660 Plz
😍
Why don’t you do benchmarks on resident evil village?
This GPU alone is what had carried so many people during the pandemic back in 2020 until 2021, but for now in 2023 this GPU falling short not even worth it to buy new better off with an RX 6600 if you're on a seriously low budget
Yeesss, caried so well... Zotac 1650 SUPER
1650 super version, that was the king of the budget segment. 1650 falls short
1650 Super = RX580
@@sheek1982 1650super< rx 580, rx 580 is 8gb vram where's 1650super is only 4gb
So true but people who say 4gb or 6gb of vram is not enough need to learn to use tab called settings
@@olehlemishka5373 are you blind ? thats because it IS not enough, even at low settings 4 and 6gb cards cant even reach 60 fps and newer games minimum vram eats atleast 6-7GB not to mention usually cards that has these Vram are usually bad not powerful enough cards, stop denying
@@Eleganttf2 True
Bough this card in october 2020 for around 140$. Not a bad investment at the time, especially when gpu prices went crazy
Bro please update, how is it now because i think imma buy a pc with that gpu
thank u for using low end hardware 2, that is why i folow u. u did alot of gtx 970 vids and 1070ti whilei had those now im looking forward to some of my 3080ti ;)
Como la mia GTX-970 de hace 7 años. En 1080p pero en baja o media,ir claro que va .La nueva que e comprado GTX- 3060 Z todo en ultra 430 euros .Saludos
I think it is weird...my mobile gtx1650ti has more fps in Atomic heart at same setings. I played it 55-70 (mostly 60-62) fps, it is a good optimized game (nowdays we didnt see games like that). but nice video as always :)
😂
In video Its plain 1650 bruh
My 1650 mobile doing it's hard to keep up😅
Because GTX 1650 TI have more performance compared with GTX 1650 desktop
*Nice!*
*Still very playable in 30FPS, I wonder about T1000 8gb.*
you should've used a lower end cpu like 12100f cus that's what most people use and it would have shown the actual fps
I'm surprised it even managed 30fps in some of these games. Anyone that owns a 4gb card like this obviously wouldn't have high expectations of how their games will look & perform. I'm sure the card being based on Turing is carrying it a little too.
Man, just show the settings for rest of the video. It's like a common thing every game benchmark video has, except you.
2 gb midrange gpu from early PS4 release = 4 gb gpu release around PS5 early life. Same unsatisfaction.
I cannot say anything about 8 gb gpu. Take radeon RX 6600 or RX 6700. Both are cheaper below RTX 3060 price tag/msrp.
I used to be proud with Radeon RX 570 purchase. Same pricing as GTX 1050 ti with better performance.
Do you have a chance to test Asus Dual RX 5500 XT if you can do it with a processor like 13400f, I would appreciate it. Thanks. Also, since this card is an entry mid-range card, it would be better to test it at 1080p medium for games. 😁😁
look at the ram usage in hogwarts legacy omg
попробуйте в следующий раз подобрать настройки под 50-60 fps с этой видеокартой
низшие по всем параметрам ставь и всё
The card can't survive without fsr
I appreciate you making video of this thank you so much. I just want a gaming Pc and this help me cause low budget 😊
for witcher 3, running it in dx11 will dramatically boosts the fps, can't believe this game is a performance hog on dx12.
good benchmark video though.
What do you expect ? 1650 Should've only run Witcher 3 at the Classic update patch, not the Next gen update since the card is too weak for it
@@Eleganttf2 I'm aware of that, but I think if they were to try to run it in dx11 API, it will give a more clear and more accurate presentation at how the next-gen patch will performs in 1650.
My 1650 Ti laptop GPU can run this in stable 60fps 90% of the time when in dx11 on mix of low-medium settings with no upscaler, but performance drops significantly to the 30-40fps only when it runs in dx12, even on FSR 2 Quality it still cannot reach 60fps. (I know 1650 Ti is stronger than the base 1650, but my point still stands)
you know what i like about all of this .. your vid man it makes me dream like ive all this shyt much love bro tc
Are you fooling us
Where is star wars Jedi survivor
You put the icon of the game in thumbnail !!!!
the 10900k is doing all the heavy lifting to keep the frametime smooth btw....
Surprised 4gb is enough to keep percentile lows around 30 fps. Its an experience. Not my prefered experience but someone on a budget might not mind.
Using TAA and MSAA instead FSR. This test don't show the full potential of this video card.
no 1 gpu on steam... meanwhile you can get rx 6600 for the same price or cheaper even thought the cooling on that gpu are sometimes doodoo like biostar version.
same price or cheaper? nah, the 1650 is over $100 cheaper than the cheapest 6600... But I'll give it to you, the GTX 1650 should not be considered an option to buy in 2023.
If you have it from years ago? great, it still works.
If you need a GPU, forget about the 1650.
@@mapache-ehcapam 100$... the difference only 30$ in newegg, cheapest vs cheapest, so exaggerated..
Remmenber people, have FSR in some games or other spscaling tecnology for get more fps
Ideal gpu for so many entry level gamers 🙏🙏
not so bad
Do RX 6400 vs GTX 1650 2023 games
Glorious sub 60 fps experience.
зачем в рдр2 ставить качество текстур на ультра?🤨
Did u turn on fsr 2.0?
Strange days, cpu pulling more power than gpu.
I had some of the best memories in the last 3 years with my gtx 1650 laptop but it is not able to run modern games at 60fps so i will be shifting to Asus rog g15 AE next month . RIP GTX 1650
Go test 1650 ti please
It is a mobile GPU not a desktop one
@@Galane I know, but there are mutants Soldered, I have such a video card in a spare laptop
You use bad settings bro.
I knew this smoothbrain will pair a gtx1650 with i9 instead of an i3. lmaooo.
Its because to show the TRUE performance of the 1650 idiot, if he uses an i3 then its not gonna be GPU bound alot of times, he wanna show the max potential of 1650.
@@Eleganttf2 no right in the head individual with functional brain will use gtx1650 with i9 period,if somebody stuck with a low end gpu like this they 100% could give damn about how it will do with a high end cpu,because budget cpu is only option,I dont how it's hard to get common sense level information through your thick bullied all life skull
This GPU for old games!!!
MINE CANT RUN MINECRAFT
1650 sucks !
When you have an 1650 its maybe time for an upgrade !
Total disgrace of a card.
RX 6400 is a joke worse than GTX 1650
1650 must play low 720p :)
No
@@Galane play cs go 2k:)))
@Ayush Kumar 1660 super so cheap should used it
nah 1080p low-med
no
It isn't that bad
RX 570 2017 performance in 2023 hahaha good work Nvidia 🤡🤡🤡
You know rx 6400 exist
1st
Virgin ong
1650 still going strong! (for the people that already have it! don't buy it lol)
I live in Turkey and Gtx 1650 super is equivalent to our 1 month salary 🥲 life is so cruel