Actually seen this happen live out my window.one single LARGE lightning bolt straight down from the sky,hitting the middle of the plane,then come out the bottom.i was shocked @ first but watched the plane fly safely out of view.watching this video made me realise how calm and professional pilots can be.great vid.ty
This was interesting to find. I flew out of BDL the next day on SWA flight to SMF. I've flown out of MHT to MCO a couple times. This made me feel even better about always flying SWA. Pilot was so calm and professional.
I was in a plane during a thunderstorm. It was pretty scary. The plane just dropped at one point. I think my stomach is still up there somewhere. LolI really like this one. It's fascinating to hear how they do things. Thanks for doing this one!
@@TheMoose5 Pilots get the destination airport's weather by tuning to the ATIS frequency. Whenever the ATIS is updated, it cycles through the alphabet. When the pilots contact the approach controller they state which version of the ATIS they have received so the controller knows they have the most current information. This pilot forgot which ATIS version they had received.
Dude... I watch A LOT of ATC videos, I think I have listened for like 500 hours on different UA-cam channels and somehow I found your videos, they are the BEST, THE BEST. Keep it up man. I will share it with my friends who are interested in ATC and stuff to expand your channel!
Just a note....at 4:28 the control advises that Portsmouth has a longer runway and is 30 miles away. The subtitles read Portland Airport which is further away and is a shorter runway than MHT.
Good catch. Not sure why I thought Portland made any sense given it's on the other side of the continent. I'd blame transcription fatigue but it's less than a quarter of the way through the video!
@@AirTrafficVisualised Portland Maine (KPWM) is about 65 nautical miles away so it isn't really that bad but Pease (KPSM) definitely has the longer runway. I live in Maine and grew up flying around the region so it was a bit obvious for me. By the way I love the graphics and the audio.
I gotta take another look at my North American geography, I think! Thanks for the local knowledge correction, and great to hear you're enjoying the content!
I love how well made these are, and how well they showcase the not-quite-day-to-day abnormalities pilots everywhere are trained to handle, and really gives a glowing display of just how safe flying really is. Every video makes me feel that much safer with flying, and as someone brought up watching cheesy movies, overdramatized 'true disaster' documentaries, and overly-dramatic news coverage I thank you. Have you ever considered expanding those horizons to occasionally cover other sectors like rail and marine events? though these might not have much audio to spice up, your visual style seems like it would be a great aid in, for example, visualizing interesting ATSB, NTSB, or other transport safety organizations from ountries besides, their incident reports and the like. I know for sure I've seen a lot of very interesting and thoroughly detailed breakdowns of events both minor and major, though most would be inherently less interesting in a way, since there's a lack of audio accompaniment and a good amount of guesswork in extrapolating data, especially from older incidents. Plus those may not be your area of interest, and that is perfectly reasonable. ♥ I simply find all sorts of network mass-transportation systems and the layers of training, safety etc that go alongside when small incidents of human error, infrastruture failure, or system failure occur - or *nearly* occur, as near-misses are often very interesting and invaluable to the understanding of safety - to be quite fasinating reading, and feel they might be a neat concept to try on if you ever feel the need to shake up the usual content with a departure from the norm on special occasions.
Thanks for the detailed comment. As for exploring incident reports, I have done a few of those in the past - check out Aircraft Loading Error (ua-cam.com/video/dC-740IWL1U/v-deo.html) and Separation Fixation (ua-cam.com/video/HTxNruF8nK0/v-deo.html) for examples of that kind of content. Regarding rail and marine incidents, I'm reminded of season 3 of Air Crash Investigation / Mayday where there were some of those episodes thrown in. I think the producers at Cineflix ended up feeling about those experiments the same way I did - they're not worth pursuing. Not that I'm ruling it out completely but my area of interest is predominately aviation. Additionally, as you said, there's much less opportunity for including real world radio transmissions for that sort of mode of transport, meaning it'd be on me to make it interesting! If there was a particularly interesting marine or rail incident I might consider it but for now I'm quite happy covering aviation. If there's any specific incident you have in mind (aviation, rail, marine, or anything else) feel free to suggest it. Many thanks again for the well thought out comment, really pleased to hear that people enjoy my work. Usually people say they feel less safe flying after watching my videos but really I think they illustrate how safe it is. You can just hear in the pilot's voices when they declare an emergency - they're calm and ready to respond. Cheers!
Following a flight over a real map is so much esier to understand than the confusing and cluttered radar sectors that VASAviation presents.You are doing a hell of a job. I'll check my finances to see if I can go Patron on you.
Hi Janne, many thanks for your comment. If you've got a second, I'd be interested to hear your opinion on videos like Dreamliner Diversion (ua-cam.com/video/pDBeCJNDFLM/v-deo.html) which are more towards radar sectors but still with a background geographical map included. I'd sure appreciate your support on Patreon but if you're not able a like and a share would be a worthy substitute.
My secret to not burning out is multifaceted: I only make videos that I'm interested in; I only make videos when I feel like it (thus why there are sometimes pretty big gaps in my output); and I've got a lot of templates, batch scripts, and workflows that I've developed over the three years I've been making content that really help out with the more finicky and time consuming aspects of production.
@@AirTrafficVisualised Would you mind giving us some insight into your workflow? Especially the real-life data processing and representation. I'm trying to achieve this myself for my personal flights.
Sure. Like I said, I've been developing my workflow for several years so it's not straightforward, but for someone looking at map-based visualisations I'd recommend you look into QGIS. I use OpenStreetMap data as the base map layer (styled in QGIS). For someone just starting out, I'd recommend trying to get a static image visualisation first - get comfortable with maps, projections, styling, etc. Animating the data is a whole next level of complexity, if you're not already familiar with software like After Effects then you're going to have a rough time. My work heavily relies on expressions (a type of JavaScript coding in After Effects) to drive the animations, cameras, and visual effects. I'm still actively developing my workflow a lot each time I work on a video and I've been at it fairly solidly for a number of years, so it'd be an extremely steep learning curve for a newcomer. Anyway, I hope this helps you get started and hasn't put you off too much!
@@AirTrafficVisualised thanks. I am actually somewhat familiar with AE and expressions, and I managed to make animations based on real-life data ("black box" recordings): ua-cam.com/video/6W7kWo9q_9A/v-deo.html but I find the workflow finicky and time consuming. I haven't tried in some time but I remember having issues with poor rendering performance, object tracking, and some bugs. So far I have been using an AE plugin for maps. I'll check out QGIS :) May I ask where you get your data (traffic, weather, airspaces)?
Only thing I failed to understand is why they just didn't burn fuel while at the same time going towards their destination instead of going in circles in the midst of a weather system. I understand they wanted to be close to a landing strip, but between NH and FL there are many many places they could have used if things became dicey. I'm sure they had their reasons, I just don't know what they were.
Could you guys put together a video of Sunwing Airlines flight WG604??? Happened in July 2017 where their 737 took off from Montreal and declared an emergency due to a passenger making threats. NEAD launched 2 F15’s which met the plane over Albany, NY and escorted them back to Montreal
If you've got suggestions for what you'd like to see next, head on over to my Patreon and let me know! This one shouldn't have taken as long as it did to get done, but it was plagued by rendering errors - and at nearly 32 hours to render each time it pushed the video back quite a long way.
So SWA2515 declared an emergency but no indication on their tag that they changed squawk codes. I realize this is a reproduction but I am curious whether it is typical to highlight an emergency aircraft tag on live ATC tracks or if that's just done in certain reproductions.
if they followed the checklist, and I am certain they did, they would have squawked 7700 as part of that. I suspect they did as well because none of the subsequent controllers asked the about any emergency declaration or equipment needs.
I was on a flight making an approach to Atlanta airport when lightning struck one of the engines! The airline and crew tried to BS saying at no time was the plane in danger and lightning strikes were a common occurrence! The passengers did not feel they were safe and I did not buy their planned speech!!
The last time a plane was brought down by lightning was way back in 1963! Planes are designed to discharge lightning with no ill effects, yes you might see a big flash, you might even hear a bang, but you are not in any danger. A plane gets hit by lightning everyday somewhere in the world. You have a greater chance of being killed by a lightning bolt hitting you on the ground then you have of being in a plane brought down by it. See this, maybe things will be clearer for you ua-cam.com/video/olxaFBtCV4Q/v-deo.html
the last time a lightning strike was "blamed" for bringing down a civilian aircraft was in 1967! air-frame design has come on in leaps and bounds since then just like all other technologies, but don't take my word for it, see what a real pilot has to say about lightning stikes ua-cam.com/video/olxaFBtCV4Q/v-deo.html
Rey Nice visuals, another interesting saga, do we head for Boston, Buffalo, or Bradley, anybody know if WN has any kind of a maintenance facility on the east coast, Baltimore or Philly??? WN 2515 is currently an unused flight number, they do have Baltimore, Orlando, Baltimore/Raleigh, Baltimore/Oakland flights, was 2515 a Baltimore flight?
On the day of this incident, SWA2515 was flying LAS > MDW > MHT > MCO each day. More recently it's been flying a Sunday only service FLL > JAX > MDW > LAX > TUS, but it seems to chop and change a bit.
They're dealing with unknown damage which could worsen at any moment. They want to stay low and close to an airport to get on the ground asap if required.
They were not sure of the damage if any to the aircraft and mentioned at one point they had a vibration, a flight from New Hampshire to Orlando, FL would have taken at least 2 hours at close to MACH 0.8, with a vibration they would not have wanted to fly at a high speed or high altitude and would prefer to stay close to an airport should an actual failure or other issue arise with the aircraft is my best guess.
This whole deal stinks from beginning to end for me and anyone willing to see behind the vail of secrecy. He at first says a door is missing then possibly landing gear and radome. Then “magically” nothing is found afoul and the plane just lands. Give me a break. Sorry guys I forgot to mention in the first sentence. I’m training to be a Conspiracy Theorist. As you can imagine my wife took the children and left sometime back but my Parents, my loving parents are my solid rock of reassurance. They always remind me, I’m the one who put the hours in. Sitting in their basement Living La Vida Loca. Anyway this whole lighting strike with No Damage has 100% No Doubt Illuminati Grade A Beef Steak Undertones with just a hint of cinnamon and apple. This is a Full Bodied Conspiracy Grade 101. Piece Out.!!!!
The vibration they got immediately after a lightning strike was enough reason to call an emergency. You don't take any chances with passenger's lives when you're in the air. This was handled very professionally by everyone concerned, no one died, and the plane sustained no further damage. If only all emergencies could end this well.
Pilot are some of the most unappreciated people ... so calm and professional when shit goes down.
I always say thank you and well done to the flight deck crew just so they know that I appreciate them and what they do.
Sharica Monét forreal tho . They deserve it and then some . Never seen a profession as a whole so calm and collect . It’s amazing .
I would expect no less than "I don't give a Shit about anyone here except Me" Attitude from a Great Commercial Pilot.
ATC
This Southwest crew just showed in a superb way how you handle an emergency. They covered ALL angles. FANTASTIC! That is why SWA is the BEST!
Fantastic visualization, best I've seen. Really engaging and interesting! A big thumbs up!
Cheers Bob, much appreciated!
Lightning arrester
Actually seen this happen live out my window.one single LARGE lightning bolt straight down from the sky,hitting the middle of the plane,then come out the bottom.i was shocked @ first but watched the plane fly safely out of view.watching this video made me realise how calm and professional pilots can be.great vid.ty
A clear, calm voice in the face of adversity. Just amazing.
I’m very glad I found this video because my local airport is BDL and this is the first emergency I’ve seen there since I’ve been an avgeek. Great job!
This was interesting to find. I flew out of BDL the next day on SWA flight to SMF. I've flown out of MHT to MCO a couple times. This made me feel even better about always flying SWA. Pilot was so calm and professional.
I was in a plane during a thunderstorm. It was pretty scary. The plane just dropped at one point. I think my stomach is still up there somewhere. LolI really like this one. It's fascinating to hear how they do things. Thanks for doing this one!
Pilot is so cool. Great video
I bet he's ex-military, not hating but that cowboy attitude is pretty funny!
Ya, we are flying
"Delta 861, lvl 1-1-thousand, information...Dang It."
Lol...
We've all had those days. That snippet was unrelated but got a chuckle out of me when I was listening back so I kept it in.
Yep was pretty funny
Can someone explain this to me?
@@TheMoose5 Pilots get the destination airport's weather by tuning to the ATIS frequency. Whenever the ATIS is updated, it cycles through the alphabet. When the pilots contact the approach controller they state which version of the ATIS they have received so the controller knows they have the most current information. This pilot forgot which ATIS version they had received.
@@AirTrafficVisualised11:55 Sounds like even Bradley Approach was also amused by "Information Dangit!" 😆
Dude... I watch A LOT of ATC videos, I think I have listened for like 500 hours on different UA-cam channels and somehow I found your videos, they are the BEST, THE BEST. Keep it up man. I will share it with my friends who are interested in ATC and stuff to expand your channel!
Many thanks for the kind words, welcome aboard!
Great quality as always. Thanks for your hard work with this longer video.
Excellent work by pilot and ATC. Professionalism at its best.
its amazing how calm the pilots and ATC are
Just a note....at 4:28 the control advises that Portsmouth has a longer runway and is 30 miles away. The subtitles read Portland Airport which is further away and is a shorter runway than MHT.
Good catch. Not sure why I thought Portland made any sense given it's on the other side of the continent. I'd blame transcription fatigue but it's less than a quarter of the way through the video!
@@AirTrafficVisualised Portland Maine (KPWM) is about 65 nautical miles away so it isn't really that bad but Pease (KPSM) definitely has the longer runway. I live in Maine and grew up flying around the region so it was a bit obvious for me. By the way I love the graphics and the audio.
I gotta take another look at my North American geography, I think! Thanks for the local knowledge correction, and great to hear you're enjoying the content!
Love Manchester, it’s a small regional airport...
I love how well made these are, and how well they showcase the not-quite-day-to-day abnormalities pilots everywhere are trained to handle, and really gives a glowing display of just how safe flying really is. Every video makes me feel that much safer with flying, and as someone brought up watching cheesy movies, overdramatized 'true disaster' documentaries, and overly-dramatic news coverage I thank you.
Have you ever considered expanding those horizons to occasionally cover other sectors like rail and marine events? though these might not have much audio to spice up, your visual style seems like it would be a great aid in, for example, visualizing interesting ATSB, NTSB, or other transport safety organizations from ountries besides, their incident reports and the like. I know for sure I've seen a lot of very interesting and thoroughly detailed breakdowns of events both minor and major, though most would be inherently less interesting in a way, since there's a lack of audio accompaniment and a good amount of guesswork in extrapolating data, especially from older incidents. Plus those may not be your area of interest, and that is perfectly reasonable. ♥
I simply find all sorts of network mass-transportation systems and the layers of training, safety etc that go alongside when small incidents of human error, infrastruture failure, or system failure occur - or *nearly* occur, as near-misses are often very interesting and invaluable to the understanding of safety - to be quite fasinating reading, and feel they might be a neat concept to try on if you ever feel the need to shake up the usual content with a departure from the norm on special occasions.
Thanks for the detailed comment. As for exploring incident reports, I have done a few of those in the past - check out Aircraft Loading Error (ua-cam.com/video/dC-740IWL1U/v-deo.html) and Separation Fixation (ua-cam.com/video/HTxNruF8nK0/v-deo.html) for examples of that kind of content.
Regarding rail and marine incidents, I'm reminded of season 3 of Air Crash Investigation / Mayday where there were some of those episodes thrown in. I think the producers at Cineflix ended up feeling about those experiments the same way I did - they're not worth pursuing. Not that I'm ruling it out completely but my area of interest is predominately aviation. Additionally, as you said, there's much less opportunity for including real world radio transmissions for that sort of mode of transport, meaning it'd be on me to make it interesting! If there was a particularly interesting marine or rail incident I might consider it but for now I'm quite happy covering aviation. If there's any specific incident you have in mind (aviation, rail, marine, or anything else) feel free to suggest it.
Many thanks again for the well thought out comment, really pleased to hear that people enjoy my work. Usually people say they feel less safe flying after watching my videos but really I think they illustrate how safe it is. You can just hear in the pilot's voices when they declare an emergency - they're calm and ready to respond.
Cheers!
Great effort and job on the visuals. Nice calm attitudes and positive results by everyone.
Always comforting to hear flight crews calmly declare an emergency and announce their intentions.
Just put us back on the feeder, we want come down fast
I usually try to keep up w VASAViation's graphics but these are better and better explained. I just subscribed!
Welcome aboard!
Subbed after watching one video. Great job, can’t imagine the time it takes to make such videos! Cheers
Excellent animation!! Makes it so much easier to follow to my untrained ear. Thank you!
That's the goal, engage people who might otherwise not think they're interested and show them how neato (I believe) aviation is.
Wow. The Chester VOR is only 12 Miles from me. They were flying right over us during that emergency and approach. Crazy
promizeband I feel like it was just yesterday I was at gate 12... oh wait...
That’s some of the best flying I’ve seen yet, right up to the point of that snot nosed jockey buzzing the tower at over 100 knots.
What a start to a trip to see Mickey!
I saw MHT mentioned on the title of the video. My first home airport :) (Second is Boston lol)
Mr. Noobser Same. I remember watching this takeoff and listening on live atc.
Same!
Yay! Same
Mr. Noobser same here,I’m in NASHUA
Hello from Enfield!
it's nice just listen to the pros at work
Nice to have one that ends well.
*AC/DC Thundrestruck Kicks in*
Well this channel is underrated
Following a flight over a real map is so much esier to understand than the confusing and cluttered radar sectors that VASAviation presents.You are doing a hell of a job. I'll check my finances to see if I can go Patron on you.
Hi Janne, many thanks for your comment. If you've got a second, I'd be interested to hear your opinion on videos like Dreamliner Diversion (ua-cam.com/video/pDBeCJNDFLM/v-deo.html) which are more towards radar sectors but still with a background geographical map included. I'd sure appreciate your support on Patreon but if you're not able a like and a share would be a worthy substitute.
Outstanding level of production. Don't you burn out from the effort you put into these videos? :)
My secret to not burning out is multifaceted: I only make videos that I'm interested in; I only make videos when I feel like it (thus why there are sometimes pretty big gaps in my output); and I've got a lot of templates, batch scripts, and workflows that I've developed over the three years I've been making content that really help out with the more finicky and time consuming aspects of production.
@@AirTrafficVisualised Would you mind giving us some insight into your workflow? Especially the real-life data processing and representation. I'm trying to achieve this myself for my personal flights.
Sure. Like I said, I've been developing my workflow for several years so it's not straightforward, but for someone looking at map-based visualisations I'd recommend you look into QGIS. I use OpenStreetMap data as the base map layer (styled in QGIS). For someone just starting out, I'd recommend trying to get a static image visualisation first - get comfortable with maps, projections, styling, etc.
Animating the data is a whole next level of complexity, if you're not already familiar with software like After Effects then you're going to have a rough time. My work heavily relies on expressions (a type of JavaScript coding in After Effects) to drive the animations, cameras, and visual effects. I'm still actively developing my workflow a lot each time I work on a video and I've been at it fairly solidly for a number of years, so it'd be an extremely steep learning curve for a newcomer.
Anyway, I hope this helps you get started and hasn't put you off too much!
@@AirTrafficVisualised thanks. I am actually somewhat familiar with AE and expressions, and I managed to make animations based on real-life data ("black box" recordings): ua-cam.com/video/6W7kWo9q_9A/v-deo.html but I find the workflow finicky and time consuming. I haven't tried in some time but I remember having issues with poor rendering performance, object tracking, and some bugs. So far I have been using an AE plugin for maps. I'll check out QGIS :)
May I ask where you get your data (traffic, weather, airspaces)?
Only thing I failed to understand is why they just didn't burn fuel while at the same time going towards their destination instead of going in circles in the midst of a weather system. I understand they wanted to be close to a landing strip, but between NH and FL there are many many places they could have used if things became dicey. I'm sure they had their reasons, I just don't know what they were.
Could you guys put together a video of Sunwing Airlines flight WG604??? Happened in July 2017 where their 737 took off from Montreal and declared an emergency due to a passenger making threats. NEAD launched 2 F15’s which met the plane over Albany, NY and escorted them back to Montreal
Southwest 2515 would be a great atc
I thought it was going to be Manchester UK. Aircraft get struck by lightning all the time, whats different about this incident?
If you've got suggestions for what you'd like to see next, head on over to my Patreon and let me know!
This one shouldn't have taken as long as it did to get done, but it was plagued by rendering errors - and at nearly 32 hours to render each time it pushed the video back quite a long way.
Do we know if it was actual damage to the door or if it was damage to the sensor / wiring? Didn't the tower say it all looked fine?
Unusual Vibration was the Factual Issue, the doors or damage to the nose was a likely cause not a declaration that it WAS the problem.
SouthWest Airlines does not fly to the UK, you IDIOT!!
Very nice mate. Keep it up!
Now! We are just about to get by lightning here
I always found it interesting that commercial planes are allowed to fly closer to thunderstorms than military jets.
Calm
Traffic at 12
So SWA2515 declared an emergency but no indication on their tag that they changed squawk codes. I realize this is a reproduction but I am curious whether it is typical to highlight an emergency aircraft tag on live ATC tracks or if that's just done in certain reproductions.
if they followed the checklist, and I am certain they did, they would have squawked 7700 as part of that. I suspect they did as well because none of the subsequent controllers asked the about any emergency declaration or equipment needs.
I don’t understand.. I thought the skin was designed to redirect lightning strikes so they aren’t an issue?
I was on a flight making an approach to Atlanta airport when lightning struck one of the engines! The airline and crew tried to BS saying at no time was the plane in danger and lightning strikes were a common occurrence! The passengers did not feel they were safe and I did not buy their planned speech!!
The last time a plane was brought down by lightning was way back in 1963! Planes are designed to discharge lightning with no ill effects, yes you might see a big flash, you might even hear a bang, but you are not in any danger. A plane gets hit by lightning everyday somewhere in the world. You have a greater chance of being killed by a lightning bolt hitting you on the ground then you have of being in a plane brought down by it. See this, maybe things will be clearer for you ua-cam.com/video/olxaFBtCV4Q/v-deo.html
Are you naive enough to think that you were ever not in danger? Flying at 500 mph in a pressurized aluminum can propelled by fire?
the last time a lightning strike was "blamed" for bringing down a civilian aircraft was in 1967! air-frame design has come on in leaps and bounds since then just like all other technologies, but don't take my word for it, see what a real pilot has to say about lightning stikes ua-cam.com/video/olxaFBtCV4Q/v-deo.html
Rey Nice visuals, another interesting saga, do we head for Boston, Buffalo, or Bradley, anybody know if WN has any kind of a maintenance facility on the east coast, Baltimore or Philly??? WN 2515 is currently an unused flight number, they do have Baltimore, Orlando, Baltimore/Raleigh, Baltimore/Oakland flights, was 2515 a Baltimore flight?
On the day of this incident, SWA2515 was flying LAS > MDW > MHT > MCO each day. More recently it's been flying a Sunday only service FLL > JAX > MDW > LAX > TUS, but it seems to chop and change a bit.
That's my local airport!
4:40: “visibility 4” not poor
gee i was like southwest in manchester ??? then i was like ahhh NH.
Manchester NH!
When did Southwest start flying to England?
Manchester, New Hampshire!
You TIT SWA does not fly to Europe let alone England
Why not try to burn the fuel in the direction of the destination? They'd be halfway to the destination with all that burn time....
They're dealing with unknown damage which could worsen at any moment. They want to stay low and close to an airport to get on the ground asap if required.
@7:16 Southwest pilot "We want to get rid of as much gas as possible" - ATC "Well then take Gas-X!!!!"
Can't they just try SCE to aux?
No pictures
I thought it was Manchester UK
No "shit-for-brains" Manchester, N.H. Geez
If they did all that flying to burn fuel why didn't they just go to where they were going.
They were not sure of the damage if any to the aircraft and mentioned at one point they had a vibration, a flight from New Hampshire to Orlando, FL would have taken at least 2 hours at close to MACH 0.8, with a vibration they would not have wanted to fly at a high speed or high altitude and would prefer to stay close to an airport should an actual failure or other issue arise with the aircraft is my best guess.
This page is way better than VASAviatio
I try my best! Many thanks.
Cut out the sound effects though, makes it a bit busy and doesn't really add to much.
Ground doesn’t give him clearance until he got yankee. What a dink.
I hate that "cleaver" voice tone from the pilot.. ad he do a great job he acts like he knows the future...!
This whole deal stinks from beginning to end for me and anyone willing to see behind the vail of secrecy. He at first says a door is missing then possibly landing gear and radome. Then “magically” nothing is found afoul and the plane just lands. Give me a break. Sorry guys I forgot to mention in the first sentence. I’m training to be a Conspiracy Theorist. As you can imagine my wife took the children and left sometime back but my Parents, my loving parents are my solid rock of reassurance. They always remind me, I’m the one who put the hours in. Sitting in their basement Living La Vida Loca. Anyway this whole lighting strike with No Damage has 100% No Doubt Illuminati Grade A Beef Steak Undertones with just a hint of cinnamon and apple. This is a Full Bodied Conspiracy Grade 101. Piece Out.!!!!
The vibration they got immediately after a lightning strike was enough reason to call an emergency. You don't take any chances with passenger's lives when you're in the air. This was handled very professionally by everyone concerned, no one died, and the plane sustained no further damage. If only all emergencies could end this well.
Chris Robinson why do you feed the troll?
Tinbum is a Party Pooper
I agree completely Chris Robinson.
Hugh, u need more training as that drivel was a kindergarten attempt at forming a conspiracy plot.
CLICK BAIT title - You see absolutely nothing and is nothing more than an ATC recording - thumbs down
What did you expect exactly on an air traffic channel? Video from a camera on the tail of the airplane? Schmuck.
@@stargazer7644 - I EXPECTED TO SEE A 737 STRUCK BY LIGHTNING as falsely advertised in the title with overlay audio from ATC - SCHMUCK