Tom Mulcair questions Speaker's 'neutrality' RAW
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 вер 2014
- NDP Leader Tom Mulcair's questions on Canada's mission in Iraq is met with a counter-attack by Conservative MP Paul Calandra over the NDP's stance on Israel, leading Mulcair to question Speaker Andrew Scheer's 'neutrality.'
»»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: ua-cam.com/users/cbcnews?...
Connect with CBC News Online:
For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: www.cbcnews.ca
Find CBC News on Facebook: / cbcnews
Follow CBC News on Twitter: / cbcnews
For breaking news on Twitter: / cbcalerts
Follow CBC News on Google+: plus.google.com/+CBCNews/posts
Follow CBC News on Instagram: / cbcnews
Follow CBC News on Pinterest: / cbcnews
Follow CBC News on Tumblr: / cbcnews
»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
For more than 75 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.
This is joke why the conservative MP wouldn't answer the question
Try getting Trudeau to answer something
Kayann Henry yeah we all know Trudeau is terrible, but I think this guy asked a genuine question about why he wouldn’t talk about Iraq.
"Hello friend. Can you tell me about Orange Juice and why you like it?"
"Yes, Pepsi is my favourite pop because..."
"Okayyy...but I was talking about Orange Juice"
"Yes, Pepsi is really tasty because..."
"I said ORANGE Juice"
"YOU CLEARLY ARE ALL OVER THE PLACE AND HAVE NO POSITION! I WILL CONTINUE TO SUPPORT PEPSI!"
I know its very simplified but please tell me I'm funny :P
gave me a chuckle. :)
It's pretty much spot on.
You funny
@AbsoluteTruth xD
Interesting to see this now after Andrew Scheer’s divisive tenure as Conservative leader. History has certainly proven Mulcair right.
Does anyone really think Scheer is neutral??
The act that now he is running for head of the Cons proves his bias without a doubt. Not getting my vote. Guaranteed he has a dual citizenship thus a conflict of interest.
@@MrBubba19692 you do realize the Speaker is an MP right? you do realize he's elected, right?
@@christophertrueman6701 You do realize neither affects my arguement right?
AY CARUMBA /FACE PALM
@@christophertrueman6701 "Guaranteed he has a dual citizenship thus a conflict of interest."
Well this comment didn't age well.
It shouldn't be a big deal that he has a dual-citizenship, but the fact is he's got one.
Even if I was a conservative supporter, I wouldn't support Andrew Scheer as PM in this election precisely because of his abysmal tenure as speaker of the house and his inability to demonstrate a modicum of neutrality in a role that isn't partisan. If he couldn't be the speaker for all MPs, there is no way he can be PM for all Canadians.
Weather side you support Mr. Mulcair asked about Iraq not Israel
Well-played, Mr. Mulcair, followed by typical Tory non-sequitur responses.
Parliament is like kindergarten ...
How about Tom Mulcair's Gryffindor tie?
Still waiting for speaker Dumbledore to shout out 5 points for gryffindor. 😋
What the fk is going on.. Why are you keep talking about Israel alliance, when asked about the number of Canadian troops deployed in Iraq on ground.
Welcome to the conservative party.
Every time it cut to the Con I literally had to check the video to see if I had accidentally made it skip backwards. Either missing the question entirely, or completely ignoring it? Why did he keep repeating himself about Israel?
Why was that ok with Scheer??? Maybe because of his two conflicts of interest..... Israel and The Conservative party leadership. Just maybe hunh?
@@MrBubba19692 speakers are becoming like monarchs - less intrusive. Nowadays, heckling, jeering, clapping, and even name calling in some cases can fly. Maybe the GG should step in 🤔🇨🇦
This Paul Calandra guy was a perfect set up to a 22 Minute sketch with having Mark Critch impersonate him not answering questions
The conservatives are embarrassing. I hope your party is ready for November. Canada sure is. Alberta voted on how they felt about Conservatives recently, now the rest of the country gets to decide how we feel about the Conservative agenda and their runaway control of the house.
I've never been more ashamed of my country as I have been during this Conservative majority government.
Go Mulcair! a man who will stand up to the speaker!
Ryan Velasco He will stand up for Canadians.
He certainly will which is why he has my vote in Oct.
Ryan Velasco You can't vote for the Prime Minister. You vote for an MP in your riding. Hope you know who to vote for
Parker Martin Yes I know, Mulcair leads the NDP, therefore a vote for NDP is a vote for Mulcair.
+NitroTV Yeah, so hard, but I will give the speaker some points for his rebuttal video. I still side with Mulcair though :)
this is why I like Tom Mulcair and completely despise Paul Calandra and Andrew Scheer
love tom muclair the best guy there 👍
Can you believe this nonesense! They could have fixed this by playing even Steven from the very beginning. Instead we get this! I can't believe it!!
I cant watch this all day
Trudeau has adopted the Conservative tradition of not answering questions, a tradition PP will be sure to honour if he wins a majority.
I love how the NDP applaud Mulcair for simply standing up. Way to go, Tommy. Good job.
He couldve just had heart surgery...he is that age 😉
One thing I will say makes Canadian politics unique is that they tend to applaud their party leaders before saying anything
Someone has to help me on this-- why does the camera in the HoC crap? XD
DarthAlphaTheGreat It's pretty good compare to cameras of some UA-camr use, and the camera shooter is actually pretty good. But it looks like it's 10 years old. I guess it's good enough, but why?
Things sure haven't changed since 2015, have they? When do Liberals answer constructive questions by the Conservatives when they seldom put them forward, or reframe them critically and constructively?
this is too stupid... and too easy for Mulcair lol...
God I miss Tom...
You can see him on ctv news
Is that because ever since they got rid of him now they only win about 24 to 23 seats
3:33 I don't think you are suppose to be on your phone...
Watching this just shows it doesn’t matter what government is in power it’s simply dodge dodge dodge.
It is funny because Tom is first to ask a question... and then the conservative replies with a question. Tom the question again wording it differently and again the conservatives reply with the exact same question. And they say Justin is a bad pubic speaker hahahaha
this is awkward seeing this today. also... "pubic?"
Doesn't look like speaker was neutral in this case.
Neutral in that he did nothing to stop either side from discussing (talking past each other). Methinks a bit too neutral - like a monarch...unintrusive.
Iraq man,not Israel
Hey buddy your not neutral fwend. Im not your fwend guy.
Iraq.......... WMD........ 7 years later....... i wonder what the comments would look like. I also wonder why the GOOGLE ALGORITHM put this in my feed?!?!?!?!?!?
Is the NDP still the Opposition? Last time I read a newspaper or watched a TV report, Justin was the official opposition. Mulcair's views are kind of like the time I go for a sandwich or take a shit.
Spudd McKenzie The NDP are still the opposition, the Liberals barely have any seat. Although some people still think of the Liberals as the opposition.
Spudd McKenzie The liberals have almost no seats. they are hardly even relevant.
+Derek Verveer Of course the above comment is now wholly inaccurate..
+Sam Hodkin Well that's obvious. :P
Scheer stupidity
But good for a laugh
Whether or not you agree with Tom's beliefs, he is a character.
A nation FUBAR....
***I swore I would never vote for a lying lawyer. Every lawyer we elected was a crook, but a great ,and manipulative speaker. How is Thomas any different, that is what I would like to know? Why should I vote for him? What makes him different, and how could I possibly trust him?***
And some will still vote Trudeau... lol.
we need to be in Iraq
This is exactly the same as watching selfie boy dodge and evade Scheers questions today. Trudeau does EXACTLY the same thing. Just repeats talking points over and over. I WILL be voting for Andrew Scheer in 2019 but it saddens me to have to admit that regardless of who is in power... The behaviour will be the same. This is politics. This is why we need SMALLER government! Not bigger government. Politics is a game of corruption regardless of party lines. And the bigger the government is... The more corruption. Its a no win situation.
Voting for the party that best represents your beliefs is all you can do.... It doesn't matter who is leading the party... They all toe the party line regardless of campaign promises. Putting your faith in an individual leader is pointless. They're all the same animal. And... If Scheer wins in 2019... He will do exactly as Trudeau is do I g today... Its just the sad reality of politics. We WILL see question periods just like this .... No matter who is leading the government. It is very disheartening.
so, fear-voting for another installed, feminist, globalist, status quo shill eh? scheer, who wants us involved in ukraine...who recently tweeted his support for the flase flag attack in syria, JUST. LIKE. JUSTIN. im voting Libertarian Party of Canada and Tim Moen, who have adopted Mad Max Berniers policies verbatim, unless Max is somehow given his rightful place as CPC leader by oct 2019...im refuse to continue the cycle of red or blue banker's puppets.
save Canada from the cons vote NDP
= STOP any and all Members dis respectful annoying NOISES - highly disruptive behaviors in the background - It is a SICKENING AND TOTALLY INEFFECTIVE way to lead !
= NO ORDER in Canada's HOUSE - we need a TRUMP Energy to lead and clean that House for sure !! We empathize with the opposition having to endure such lack of integrity demonstrated in a constant effort to perversely undermine questions periods !! CANADIANS deserve BETTER governance NOW *