That was an amazing breakdown. Not being a ST nerd, there are a lot of things going on that I didn't notice, but you put it into simple terms, and made it easy to follow.
At first glance, this play seemed really good. It wasn't until you broke it down and explained the design of it that it made it an amazing play, with excellent execution.
Hey Isaac. I commented on a prior video bringing up the need for more strategic analysis... and you seriously delivered even within the same afternoon. Thank you a ton, and can't wait to see what else you put out in the future
The tight end not running directly at the “safety” defender but away from the play forces just enough hesitation and distraction for the runner to get past the line of scrimmage and in space to make a play. Its a fairly simple fake but indeed very clever and executed perfectly
As a former guard, I especially loved that their left guard pulled to kick out! I'm also a huge (literally and figuratively) OU fan. Great job on your breakdown!
Thanks Isaac! Being an Iowa State alum it was hard to watch again. After the game I had gone back and watched the play a couple times trying to see where the break down occured. Thank you for slowing it down and your Xs and Os diagram.
It might be an off field coaching position currently, but having a special teams coordinator again, is so much fun. The vanilla special teams was getting so old under TBOW.
Wait, you mean you didn’t like calling for fair catches at the 15 yard line on kickoffs when no defender was within 10 yards of the return man?! That’s a very unique strategy. Literally nobody else does that! Haha!
This was a phenomenal play. And thank you for breaking it down for us. Just goes to show you how intelligent, football smart their coach really is. I'm sure venables is highly missed at Clemson. I'm kind of glad he isn't there either. But it makes it difficult since he's now a head coach for other teams.
Idk special teams at all but the way u explained this and the way u explained the guard covering the edge rusher made me nut... never gonna look at special teams the same again
#2 red was so committed to the rush that it turned out the pulling G's block was superfluous. So the only good way to see the beauty of the play would be if (or if you imagine) the edge rusher's being under more control and adjusting, so the kickout block on him would mean something.
I’m a rugby fan and live in the UK and I haven’t watched American Football, as we call it here, since the likes of Joe Theismann, Marcus Allen and Dan Marino were strutting their stuff but that play was a thing of beauty.
Makes me wonder if the setup for this fake is running an identical blocking scheme within your main offense. You get them to practice that, then it’s easy to just install the concept from a special teams set.
Excellent commentary! What’s a mystery is how was the play called so all the players knew it was a fake. There’s no quarterback calling audibles but they wouldn’t have known until they saw the defense lined up. Unless they all have secret helmet headphones, it’s a bit mysterious.
948/60K 9 days ago 26.4K Thanks Yes I do Love it as much as you But i didnt know I did untill you explained it me and for what its worth Your excitment of telling the story was an added bonues
If 17 reads that play better he can behead the kicker. It's tough because he has to decide between run/pass but if he commits to the hole, I can imagine the duck that comes out of that kickers hand.
My only question is, was it a legal play, or did the regs miss the fact that the holder's knee was down when he pitched the ball forward to the kicker?
Completely legal under NCAA and NFL rules. Under NF (high school) rules the holder must lift his knee prior to releasing the ball but not at this level. This is why after a play like this in a college game we must discuss it as high school officials as we are much more likely to see it soon. This is where some high school coaches don't realize there is a subtle difference in the rules of which they may not be aware. Texas and Connecticut use NCAA rules for high school games so in those states it would also be legal.
It is so well designed that it does not take even great execution to work. Average execution gets it done. I think that is what makes a play design amazing.
I disagree. Its not an overly complicated play so the timing and execution is everything. If the guard is too slow the edge rusher can get hands on the runner and if the tight end is too slow the “safety” may not take the bait. Theres a also the snap and toss. Lots of little things have to happen for the play to work. “Average” execution wouldn’t be a walk in touchdown imo
How does he get away with that with his knee on the ground when he throws the ball off to the kicker and I don't know if that's the rule or not but his knees on the ground when they hike in that ball
Completely legal under NCAA and NFL rules. Under NF (high school) rules the holder must lift his knee prior to releasing the ball but not at this level. This is why after a play like this in a college game we must discuss it as high school officials as we are much more likely to see it soon. This is where some high school coaches don't realize there is a subtle difference in the rules of which they may not be aware. Texas and Connecticut use NCAA rules for high school games so in those states it would also be legal.
This is what i came to post as well. It’s the same as a qb taking a shotgun snap and kneeling. The play should be dead. When i played qb, i was also our holder for kicks. I was taught to keep the knee off the ground in case of a bobbled snap and needed an emergency pass play.
It goes back 90 years to when they first made the rule that a ballcarrier would be down on touching the ground with any part of the body except hands and feet, regardless of contact with the defense. (The pros broke away from that immediately or shortly after.) The rules committee immediately saw they'd have to make an exception for a player placing the ball for a teammate's place kick, so they did. However, it took until 1955 for NCAA to make it legal to continue such a play other than by kicking the ball, so you could fake a place kick and then have the holder run or pass the ball. I don't know exactly when Federation rules allowed for same, but they've differed subtly in that Fed requires the player to get off the ground before advancing or passing the ball, while NCAA allows any of these actions by the ostensible holder from a kneeling position. In either code, the ball is dead if the holder still has a knee on the ground once there's no longer a potential kicker in position. So the answer to your question is a specific exception written into the rules. The more interesting question is how you can kill the ball under pro rules when the opposing team has someone holding and kneeling. Unless there's been a recent change, the answer is that the holder either has to voluntarily and *visibly* make the ball dead (no more crying "down" IIRC) or for the opponents to stop his progress. Or as someone put it some years ago, in the pros you'd have to smear the holder. An even more interesting question in the pros is whether the opponents would be allowed to snatch or kick the ball away. Pro rules forbid the snatching of the ball from an opponent on the ground, and kicking the ball out of an *opponent's* hold is not considered a place kick, so apparently such actions would be considered delay of game or illegally kicking the ball -- although you'd think they might make an exception for a player who's holding the ball for a teammate to kick, since it just seems unfair that one team's allowed to play a live ball but not the other.
@@goodmaro I appreciate the explanation. See to me, the way that's screwed up is this : sure, if the ball ends up being kicked for the PAT/FG, then the holder is exempt from being called down when the ball is snapped back to him and he's placing it for the kicker. BUT if the play results in the ball not being kicked on PURPOSE and instead the team tries to ADVANCE the ball by design (not as the result of a bad snap, but by intent), then the knee being down should be subjected to the same rules as any other play. We see exceptions like this based on intent, built into football all the time, such as the spike to stop the clock NOT being intentional grounding. I don't understand why it's not the same concept with PAT's and FG's in regards to a knee being down by the holder being exempted or not based on how the play unfolds. 🤷♂️ it's stupid to base the legality on the alignment and whether a kicker is present in the backfield or not instead of based on the actual actions occurring on the play. Dumb.
@@TheLwaller09 There are a lot worse judgment calls based on intent in football than this. The 1932 change was made for safety, and while the pros never adopted it they have over the years modified their rules to make it easier for the ball to become dead. For all I know there may have been those saying in 1932 that the place kick holder should have to squat. But it was considered for decades an acceptable tradeoff in NCAA that said you could place-kick, but *only* place-kick, from a hold like that. I'd have to look at their proceedings leading up to the 1955 change to see how the arguments went. Probably there'd been some close calls over the years on fake field goal plays where the ostensible holder would get his knee off the ground a tiny fraction of a second before catching the snap, and the argument went, why make them do something the officials can barely see to begin with? However, that problem has not deterred Fed in that they have to make the same determination in cases where the ostensible holder passes the ball. Canadian amateur football rules have exceptions to the dead balls that'd probably make your head spin. You're down if you have the ball and any body part other than hands or feet down, with the same exception for placing the ball for a kick, but also exceptions if you go to one or both knees to field a bouncing kick, backward pass, or snap, provided you get up immediately on gaining possession. Rugby Union has an even finer discrimination in that you can't play the ball if you're already on the ground, unless you went to the ground specifically to play the ball and then get up immediately or get away from it; and then an opponent has to let you get off the ground, but can tackle you the instant you do -- imagine the bang-bang calls!
@@IsaacPunts NCAA Rule 4-1-3 II covers that specifically. Since Zach Schmidt was lining up as a kicker, and Turk's knee was on the ground, the play is legal.
Because NCAA allowed it beginning in 1955. Previously from 1932 they'd've had to go thru with the kick or the ball would be dead. Before 1932, you weren't down unless an opponent held you.
@@RoyalMela Thank you, but I don’t really need to know the rules because I already know that the holder is allowed to be on the ground. I was just pointing out that it was a pass from a guy already on his knee which you don’t see every game.
You don't see blue blood programs having to resort to "trick plays" in order to beat their conference dwellers. My how the mighty have fallen! Perhaps you could analyze that?
Great analysis. I agree super sexy play. I usually refrain from using sexy with things I don't want to have sex with like cars or football plays/players but you're right it's a great play.
Holder is down on one knee, he is down, only allowed to be on one knee because of kicking…I cannot see how he can go from one knee to running a new play #overhype
Wait...wait....wait....the ref missed it. Should have been down, as the holder had his knee down on the ground when he caught the ball. The rule says the ball is down and dead at that spot.
Can't tell if this is a joke but no, the play does not end because of the holders knee being on the ground thanks to a special exception for the holder as long as they're in field goal formation he may have his knee on the ground and the play can continue
For those wondering about how a holder can lateral a snap with his knee on the ground in college football. The exception for holders that allows them to have a knee on the ground, Rule 4-1-3-b, without being down, is also extennded to fake field goals. Which begs the question, if a QB is in the pistol, with a back behind him, and his knee hits the ground, can he claim they were trying for a field goal so.its still live? lol
That last bit used to be a possibility until a few years ago, when NCAA instituted a "scrimmage kick formation" rule. Pistol isn't deep enough. But even previously, if the player on the ground doesn't immediately put the ball down in the ostensible kicker's path as if for a place kick, it doesn't qualify for the dead ball exception.
That's about the only thing that went right for us this year is that fake field goal because we suck but this is a rebuild year as long as we don't have a losing season Oklahoma fans should be happy because this team was gutted when Lincoln Riley went West after taking half the coaching staff have to players and a lot of recruits and he was recruiting for Southern California while he was still at Oklahoma this would have destroyed a lot of programs but Oklahoma will be just fine it might take a season or two but coach of venables will get it together like I said as long as we don't have a losing season sooner fans should be satisfied and quit crying Oklahoma has only had five losing seasons in the last 50 years and they've only had 12 losing seasons in their entire history which dates back to 1895
As a WSU Fan I envy your "everything sucks but it's a rebuild year" where you're still going +.500 and beating top 20 teams while also dismantling teams you should beat... but I get it, you guys are used to winning a lot more than I am so this "just being pretty good" instead of dominating everyone is hard 😂
@@IsaacPunts yeah that's true but this is just a bump in the road we will be just fine at Oklahoma actually I think we will be better off in the long run with coach v at least he's not scared to go to the Southeast conference like Lincoln Riley was hopefully he will have us prepared when it's time for the move I think he will
That was an amazing breakdown. Not being a ST nerd, there are a lot of things going on that I didn't notice, but you put it into simple terms, and made it easy to follow.
Glad you like it man! Really put a lot of love into it!
At first glance, this play seemed really good. It wasn't until you broke it down and explained the design of it that it made it an amazing play, with excellent execution.
It really is, very beautiful to watch
Hey Isaac. I commented on a prior video bringing up the need for more strategic analysis... and you seriously delivered even within the same afternoon. Thank you a ton, and can't wait to see what else you put out in the future
Thanks man, glad to see people get excited about the little nuances of special teams
Hold on wait can you do more analysis like this? Super engaging and educational, I loved it
Of course King, especially if something fires me up like this does
The tight end not running directly at the “safety” defender but away from the play forces just enough hesitation and distraction for the runner to get past the line of scrimmage and in space to make a play. Its a fairly simple fake but indeed very clever and executed perfectly
so do you just watch every single special teams play for these masterpieces?
you could say I watch a TON of special teams plays
What you on about mate Isaac calls all these plays he's got a hotline to every HC in college and the NFL
Only the ones that work!
27k subscribers for a reason
As a former guard, I especially loved that their left guard pulled to kick out! I'm also a huge (literally and figuratively) OU fan. Great job on your breakdown!
This is the type of content I look forward to. Isaac delivers. Thanks much, Sir.
This is fantastic. Special teams never gets this kind of deep dive.
glad you liked it man!
Thanks Isaac! Being an Iowa State alum it was hard to watch again. After the game I had gone back and watched the play a couple times trying to see where the break down occured. Thank you for slowing it down and your Xs and Os diagram.
When this happened, I rewound the video and played it over and over about 10 times just to see exactly how this great play unfolded.
It might be an off field coaching position currently, but having a special teams coordinator again, is so much fun. The vanilla special teams was getting so old under TBOW.
Wait, you mean you didn’t like calling for fair catches at the 15 yard line on kickoffs when no defender was within 10 yards of the return man?! That’s a very unique strategy. Literally nobody else does that! Haha!
You weren't joking you did make a great video on Turks pass!! Great video
The blocking was just awesome
Great presentation of insider analysis plus just the right amount of humor...!
This was a phenomenal play. And thank you for breaking it down for us. Just goes to show you how intelligent, football smart their coach really is. I'm sure venables is highly missed at Clemson. I'm kind of glad he isn't there either. But it makes it difficult since he's now a head coach for other teams.
Before this video, I had never heard a man sound genuinely turned on by a special teams play. Now that I’ve watched it, I’m glad I have.
Dude this is like jomboy level, love it and keep these breakdowns coming
You should join Nantz and Romo on the air for any cool Special Teams plays in the NFL you'd fit right in!
Thanks man! Maybe some day you guys will hear me geeking out about special teams on TV
As you said a totally beautiful well thought out move 👍Thank you for sharing 🙂 God bless and travel safe
I love how much you love that play!
The excitement grunts get me excited, keep it up pls
Idk special teams at all but the way u explained this and the way u explained the guard covering the edge rusher made me nut... never gonna look at special teams the same again
#2 red was so committed to the rush that it turned out the pulling G's block was superfluous. So the only good way to see the beauty of the play would be if (or if you imagine) the edge rusher's being under more control and adjusting, so the kickout block on him would mean something.
Not something I'd have picked up on, but great analysis. I can definitely appreciate the breakdown and thinking that goes into this.
I’m a rugby fan and live in the UK and I haven’t watched American Football, as we call it here, since the likes of Joe Theismann, Marcus Allen and Dan Marino were strutting their stuff but that play was a thing of beauty.
Pulling offensive guards and tackles are a beauty to watch. Would be a great video: The Best of Pulling Linemen.
This is elite level analysis bro.
Love your channel man. I'm a high school coach and I'm always learning. Your channel helps me do that
thanks man, let me know if yall dial up a play like this!
Amazing breakdown from a longtime fan of football with little understanding of the chess match underlying the game!
That WAS genius, thanks for the breakdown.
When considering the closely controlled number of practice hours these athletes get as a unit it's impressive to see such great execution.
Makes me wonder if the setup for this fake is running an identical blocking scheme within your main offense. You get them to practice that, then it’s easy to just install the concept from a special teams set.
Fun to watch, great breakdown.
This is football Jomboy with less swearing. Love it.
Great analysis. Loved it.
Genius explanation and breakdown.
That was FUN! 🥰 Thank you!👊🏾
That was too funny...do you need a tissue? Aside from that aspect, excellent breakdown! Thank you.
Bro you have passion!!
That was a thing of beauty! (And now I know why.)
Excellent commentary!
What’s a mystery is how was the play called so all the players knew it was a fake.
There’s no quarterback calling audibles but they wouldn’t have known until they saw the defense lined up. Unless they all have secret helmet headphones, it’s a bit mysterious.
Probably called in from the sideline before the snap, I wasn’t cherry picking the overload film Iowa state does it EVERY time
Alignment call. Tried to run earlier in the game but ISU didn’t over load.
when you have a schedule of games to play to decide whose the best trick plays account for very little
Great breakdown
Great breakdown!
Very awesome buddy!
Learned a good bit here, Ty…..
Great break down.
Why wasn't the holder ruled down since his knee was on the ground before the shovel pass?
948/60K 9 days ago 26.4K
Thanks
Yes I do Love it as much as you
But i didnt know I did untill you explained it me
and for what its worth
Your excitment of telling the story was an added bonues
More Turk punt videos please!
That was a nice play.
ST is fully 1/3 of football.
Would the holder be considered down, with a knee down and possession of the ball?
Oh thats coming to the NFL immediately.
If 17 reads that play better he can behead the kicker. It's tough because he has to decide between run/pass but if he commits to the hole, I can imagine the duck that comes out of that kickers hand.
So why isn't the ball dead as soon as the holder does something other than place the ball?
Great vid.
Cant imagine having blockers who could do this, let alone give me 1.5 seconds to kick the ball
Since the ball went forward, I guess this was considered a pass
Yup, and the holder (OU's punter, Mike Turk) has the best pass rating in the league.
@@montecarlo1759 100% completion percentage and 50% of his passes result in a touchdown! lol
Any team worth its salt should watch and learn. It could become a 'standard' fake play for a lot of teams.
My only question is, was it a legal play, or did the regs miss the fact that the holder's knee was down when he pitched the ball forward to the kicker?
Completely legal under NCAA and NFL rules. Under NF (high school) rules the holder must lift his knee prior to releasing the ball but not at this level. This is why after a play like this in a college game we must discuss it as high school officials as we are much more likely to see it soon. This is where some high school coaches don't realize there is a subtle difference in the rules of which they may not be aware. Texas and Connecticut use NCAA rules for high school games so in those states it would also be legal.
I love you.
It is so well designed that it does not take even great execution to work. Average execution gets it done. I think that is what makes a play design amazing.
I disagree. Its not an overly complicated play so the timing and execution is everything. If the guard is too slow the edge rusher can get hands on the runner and if the tight end is too slow the “safety” may not take the bait. Theres a also the snap and toss. Lots of little things have to happen for the play to work. “Average” execution wouldn’t be a walk in touchdown imo
nah, the hurdle justin fields over parsons made was the smartest play in football history
How does he get away with that with his knee on the ground when he throws the ball off to the kicker and I don't know if that's the rule or not but his knees on the ground when they hike in that ball
This reminded me of a Jomboy Media type breakdown
Curious if anyone thinks that's an offensive hold on #66?
How is that not called down when the holder's knee is down with possession?
Completely legal under NCAA and NFL rules. Under NF (high school) rules the holder must lift his knee prior to releasing the ball but not at this level. This is why after a play like this in a college game we must discuss it as high school officials as we are much more likely to see it soon. This is where some high school coaches don't realize there is a subtle difference in the rules of which they may not be aware. Texas and Connecticut use NCAA rules for high school games so in those states it would also be legal.
@@warrenclaassen5959 Thanks so much for the informative reply. Much appreciated.
I've never understood how the holder can possess the ball with a knee on the ground and the play isn't dead right there.
This is what i came to post as well.
It’s the same as a qb taking a shotgun snap and kneeling. The play should be dead.
When i played qb, i was also our holder for kicks. I was taught to keep the knee off the ground in case of a bobbled snap and needed an emergency pass play.
It goes back 90 years to when they first made the rule that a ballcarrier would be down on touching the ground with any part of the body except hands and feet, regardless of contact with the defense. (The pros broke away from that immediately or shortly after.) The rules committee immediately saw they'd have to make an exception for a player placing the ball for a teammate's place kick, so they did.
However, it took until 1955 for NCAA to make it legal to continue such a play other than by kicking the ball, so you could fake a place kick and then have the holder run or pass the ball. I don't know exactly when Federation rules allowed for same, but they've differed subtly in that Fed requires the player to get off the ground before advancing or passing the ball, while NCAA allows any of these actions by the ostensible holder from a kneeling position. In either code, the ball is dead if the holder still has a knee on the ground once there's no longer a potential kicker in position.
So the answer to your question is a specific exception written into the rules. The more interesting question is how you can kill the ball under pro rules when the opposing team has someone holding and kneeling. Unless there's been a recent change, the answer is that the holder either has to voluntarily and *visibly* make the ball dead (no more crying "down" IIRC) or for the opponents to stop his progress. Or as someone put it some years ago, in the pros you'd have to smear the holder. An even more interesting question in the pros is whether the opponents would be allowed to snatch or kick the ball away. Pro rules forbid the snatching of the ball from an opponent on the ground, and kicking the ball out of an *opponent's* hold is not considered a place kick, so apparently such actions would be considered delay of game or illegally kicking the ball -- although you'd think they might make an exception for a player who's holding the ball for a teammate to kick, since it just seems unfair that one team's allowed to play a live ball but not the other.
@@sil-80nick You were probably playing under Federation rules, which most high schools use.
@@goodmaro I appreciate the explanation. See to me, the way that's screwed up is this : sure, if the ball ends up being kicked for the PAT/FG, then the holder is exempt from being called down when the ball is snapped back to him and he's placing it for the kicker. BUT if the play results in the ball not being kicked on PURPOSE and instead the team tries to ADVANCE the ball by design (not as the result of a bad snap, but by intent), then the knee being down should be subjected to the same rules as any other play.
We see exceptions like this based on intent, built into football all the time, such as the spike to stop the clock NOT being intentional grounding. I don't understand why it's not the same concept with PAT's and FG's in regards to a knee being down by the holder being exempted or not based on how the play unfolds. 🤷♂️ it's stupid to base the legality on the alignment and whether a kicker is present in the backfield or not instead of based on the actual actions occurring on the play. Dumb.
@@TheLwaller09 There are a lot worse judgment calls based on intent in football than this. The 1932 change was made for safety, and while the pros never adopted it they have over the years modified their rules to make it easier for the ball to become dead. For all I know there may have been those saying in 1932 that the place kick holder should have to squat. But it was considered for decades an acceptable tradeoff in NCAA that said you could place-kick, but *only* place-kick, from a hold like that.
I'd have to look at their proceedings leading up to the 1955 change to see how the arguments went. Probably there'd been some close calls over the years on fake field goal plays where the ostensible holder would get his knee off the ground a tiny fraction of a second before catching the snap, and the argument went, why make them do something the officials can barely see to begin with? However, that problem has not deterred Fed in that they have to make the same determination in cases where the ostensible holder passes the ball.
Canadian amateur football rules have exceptions to the dead balls that'd probably make your head spin. You're down if you have the ball and any body part other than hands or feet down, with the same exception for placing the ball for a kick, but also exceptions if you go to one or both knees to field a bouncing kick, backward pass, or snap, provided you get up immediately on gaining possession. Rugby Union has an even finer discrimination in that you can't play the ball if you're already on the ground, unless you went to the ground specifically to play the ball and then get up immediately or get away from it; and then an opponent has to let you get off the ground, but can tackle you the instant you do -- imagine the bang-bang calls!
If the holders knee is down why can they still run a fake ?
Some rule giving immunity to the holder to have the play not immediately die when he catches the ball
@@IsaacPunts NCAA Rule 4-1-3 II covers that specifically. Since Zach Schmidt was lining up as a kicker, and Turk's knee was on the ground, the play is legal.
@@mrmoose6619 thank you Mrmoose I was entirely too lazy to look it up myself this is why you’re a Goated sub
Because NCAA allowed it beginning in 1955. Previously from 1932 they'd've had to go thru with the kick or the ball would be dead. Before 1932, you weren't down unless an opponent held you.
It always genius when it works and stupidity when it doesn't
Actually a pass from a person whose knee was already on the ground
If you read the rules, you'd know that holder can do all even having his knee down. Yes, he can even get up and run or pass.
@@RoyalMela Thank you, but I don’t really need to know the rules because I already know that the holder is allowed to be on the ground. I was just pointing out that it was a pass from a guy already on his knee which you don’t see every game.
The line did amazing
This should be taught in high school Physics
I hate OU more than anyone and that was still a sexy play
I did, Great job. You have a good day.
Call back the TD. Play is over as the holder has a knee on the ground and touches the ball on the ground. DRT. Dead Right There.
Why isn't that tried more in the NFL?
You don't see blue blood programs having to resort to "trick plays" in order to beat their conference dwellers. My how the mighty have fallen! Perhaps you could analyze that?
Great analysis. I agree super sexy play. I usually refrain from using sexy with things I don't want to have sex with like cars or football plays/players but you're right it's a great play.
Please please please give us ‘longer’ format videos like this. PLEASE. Your typical 1 minute videos just don’t do it, we need depth and length (hehe)
Longer than 1 minute? Wanting more Depth and Length??? Who are you my GIRLFRIEND?? *cries*
Hmm. Have a running back kick extra points maybe
Great explanation!!!!
--DarrylCan’tPuntAnymore
If only Troy lined up in the c gap
I get this reference
HS coaches everywhere watching this so confused 😐
God I love special teams
You’re at the right channel
@@IsaacPunts yeah, btw did you see that Georgia punt? I’m pulling for Tennessee but WOW. Game changing.
@@whitecoffee1427 oh with out a doubt I did
@@IsaacPunts oh God and now the Clemson blocked punt… as a Clemson fan it sucks. As a special teams fan I respect it.
Holder is down on one knee, he is down, only allowed to be on one knee because of kicking…I cannot see how he can go from one knee to running a new play #overhype
Or you could just go around the side.
9/10 for analysis. 2/10 for the analogy.
ST nerds unite
Tight end blew it?
Wait...wait....wait....the ref missed it. Should have been down, as the holder had his knee down on the ground when he caught the ball. The rule says the ball is down and dead at that spot.
Can't tell if this is a joke but no, the play does not end because of the holders knee being on the ground thanks to a special exception for the holder as long as they're in field goal formation he may have his knee on the ground and the play can continue
@@IsaacPunts You are right....good call.
Ha! That is how OU took down Iowa State!
Have a sub...
5 losses but fake field goal is genius lol
I'm getting a little sick of all these Fake News stories, and you have to post this?
What happened to honesty?
Could you make you edits a little more schizophrenic, I don't feel triggered yet.
Hey dude, you may have children in your listening audience...be a little bit more aware of that please.
For those wondering about how a holder can lateral a snap with his knee on the ground in college football.
The exception for holders that allows them to have a knee on the ground, Rule 4-1-3-b, without being down, is also extennded to fake field goals. Which begs the question, if a QB is in the pistol, with a back behind him, and his knee hits the ground, can he claim they were trying for a field goal so.its still live? lol
That last bit used to be a possibility until a few years ago, when NCAA instituted a "scrimmage kick formation" rule. Pistol isn't deep enough. But even previously, if the player on the ground doesn't immediately put the ball down in the ostensible kicker's path as if for a place kick, it doesn't qualify for the dead ball exception.
Thanks Bob!
1:04 “impor-ent”?
That's about the only thing that went right for us this year is that fake field goal because we suck but this is a rebuild year as long as we don't have a losing season Oklahoma fans should be happy because this team was gutted when Lincoln Riley went West after taking half the coaching staff have to players and a lot of recruits and he was recruiting for Southern California while he was still at Oklahoma this would have destroyed a lot of programs but Oklahoma will be just fine it might take a season or two but coach of venables will get it together like I said as long as we don't have a losing season sooner fans should be satisfied and quit crying Oklahoma has only had five losing seasons in the last 50 years and they've only had 12 losing seasons in their entire history which dates back to 1895
As a WSU Fan I envy your "everything sucks but it's a rebuild year" where you're still going +.500 and beating top 20 teams while also dismantling teams you should beat... but I get it, you guys are used to winning a lot more than I am so this "just being pretty good" instead of dominating everyone is hard 😂
@@IsaacPunts yeah that's true but this is just a bump in the road we will be just fine at Oklahoma actually I think we will be better off in the long run with coach v at least he's not scared to go to the Southeast conference like Lincoln Riley was hopefully he will have us prepared when it's time for the move I think he will
I doubt it's going to get better in time to join the SEC where we're bound to have many losing records or at best 8-9 wins on a good year.