Watching BACK TO THE FUTURE PART II (1989) for the first time. Is it as good as the first?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Hey fellow lovers of time travel! 🕰️🚀 ✨ Get ready to embark on an epic journey through time with me! Back to the Future Part II took me on a wild ride that kept me on the edge of my seat at all times.⚡️ Join me as we hop into the iconic DeLorean and travel from 1985 to 2015!
Don't forget to LIKE, COMMENT, and SUBSCRIBE for more fun reaction videos! 🌟📺
But before we delve deeper, a word of caution: Spoilers lie ahead! ⚠️ So, if you haven't experienced the mind-bending magic of Back to the Future Part II yet, be sure to watch the film first! ⏰✨
Follow me on Instagram for more exciting content: / cristyreacts 📸
#BackToTheFuture #BackToTheFuturePart2 #firsttimewatching
I was 9 years old when this came out, and to this day I am still incredibly disappointed that hoverboards don't exist! 😂
I was 10, the asshole director did an interview claiming they were real but parent groups kept them from being sold. That's mean.
@jkhoover LOL! I had forgotten about that, but I think I do recall it! I'm sure every adult knew he was obviously joking, but that was *serious* to us kids! 😂
9 ALSO WAS I. DAMN I MISS THE 80s & 90s. SUCH A SIMPLER TIME.
Cars are flying. That’s what a helicopter is.
@@johankaewberg8162 Copters are copters, cars are cars. We were supposed to have flying cars by 2015 in Back to the Future and by 2019 in Bladerunner. And we were supposed to have a huge revolving international space station by 2001 in 2001: A Space Odyssey ( 1968 ). But none of that has come to pass.
I took a copter ride once. I doubt I will again, it was noisy as hell and scary. Planes are much better, lol.
The most amazing thing that Part 2 predicted that nobody but Sports fans recognize: The Chicago Cubs hadn't won the World Series since 1907. This movie predicted that they would win it in 2015. The usually terrible Cubs DID make the playoffs that year. But even more miraculous was that they DID win the World Series in 2016 (their only other Championship since 1907 and haven't come close since). That's why Marty was so shocked that the Cubs won. PLUS, there was nothing close to a "Miami" in MLB in 1985-1989. But Miami became a franchise in the 90s and they DID have a classic NLCS with the CUBS that became one of the most memorable Championship Series of all time.
soooo close to fulfilling the prophecy too
As a decades long Chicagoan, and Cubs fan, we all really hoped 2015 would happen like the movie. But in hindsight it just made 2016 even more magic.
I am however still waiting for my flying car, I’ve been promised this as a kid watching the Jetsons.
1908
@@c1ph3rpunkso....having read some waaay older comics.....should i wait for Barbarella?
@@c1ph3rpunk I don't know. The necessary training to become a _driver_ can happen inside a _week._ The necessary training to become a _pilot,_ even if you take _everything_ else off your schedule, takes between six months and a _year,_ with more than 40 logged _flying_ hours.
The most unbelievable thing in this whole franchise is that Biff has never had detention before!
Ha! Right!!!
Maybe not too unbelievable. Authority figures like Strickland seem to be easily distracted, or too busy hassling someone like Marty or George over minor stuff, leaving Biff to slide by.
A slacker like Biff should get detention every day.
When I was going to HS it was never the bullies that got in trouble.
When Strickland talks about being a slacker, he might not be talking about grades, or mental acuity. He's probably talking more about the level of ambition. We don't know what grade Biff was actually in. Maybe he was held back. That could mean that to someone like Strickland, he might appear more "mature" than his peers. Biff knew the system. He could act like an angel, when the adults were around, but torment like the devil among physically weaker peers. To Strickland, he probably looked like his idea of a leader, and therefore he was blind to Biff's other shortcomings. Biff probably had Strickland convinced that he was looking after the younger kids.
The writers basically took the "person you were reminded of" and mixed his late 80s image with the characteristics of Biff from the 1st movie to get Alternate 1985 Biff, so that isnt a coincidence
I'm so glad you noticed that the future daughter was Michael J Fox!! I've seen lots of reactors watch this movie, barely anyone seems to notice! I always expect people to laugh about it or whatever, but nope, nothing! So I really loved your reaction to it. You've made this happy man very old. :)
Thanks for uploading! Greetings from Sweden
Hahaha this comment made this happy girl very young!
As a kid I never noticed, that's how good the makeup and Michael's acting was.
@@G1NZOU I have to admit that I didn't notice as a kid either, I did however think something was strange about her. 😄
Umm, wow! I was a kid when I saw this and its a fave but I NEVER knew til now!! 🤣
You'll notice that it's a different actress playing Jennifer. The original actress, Claudia Wells, stepped away from acting to help her mother battle cancer. So the role was recast with Elizabeth Shue of "The Karate Kid" fame.
Originally, there was no plan to make a Part 2 or 3. The DeLorean taking off and flying at the end of the first movie was only meant to be a joke. But after the first movie's massive success, the studio wanted sequels. This created scriptwriting problems for writer Bob Gale, who admitted that if he had known a sequel was going to happen, he wouldn't have Jennifer get in the DeLorean with Marty and Doc. So he was forced to write around her presence when he had to write Part 2, having Doc sedate her in the first act and eventually dropping her off in the alternate 1985 so the rest of the plot could happen.
Which brings up another small point. I don't think the version watched on this channel had To Be Continued, but all the home video versions had it for decades.
and 1987's Adventures In Babysitting
Yes, the 80’s were filled with optimism for the potential of what 30 yrs into the future (2015) would look like. There were more misses that hits in futuristic predictions, but some have been created. What’s funny is that Nike actually created those identical “power lace” shoes and RELEASED them on the anniversary of the Oct 2015 BTTF2 date. There were a limited edition amount and were very expensive.
That was actually their second version. The first version was released in 2011, but didn't have the self-fastening laces. It was a limited edition that were auctioned in favor of the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's disease research (the commercial for this event featured Doc Brown btw). One of Nike's designers, Tinker Hatfield (who also designed the original shoes for the movie) created the self-lacing technology, intended for basketball, but instead of putting it on a basketball shoe first, he decided to re-release the Nike MAG (with self-fastening laces this time).
Well they did originally make them for the movie.
The "this is the future" thing was for JOKES. Like the "Cafe 80's" - recreated "50's Cafes" were very popular, so in the future it's "Cafe 80's" to put in some 80's references as a joke.
@@ShuffleUpandDeal32 They were a special effect in the movie. The tightening mechanics were underneath the ground, not integrated into the actual shoe.
Getting to Oct 21st 2015 was a sad moment for many of us. This whole trilogy now takes place in the past.
THAT WAS THE DAY I LOST MY FATHER, JUST OUT OF NOWHERE! KILLED BY DOCTORS AS WELL.
@@rexxbailey2764 I’m so sorry for your loss. My dad died in 2015, too. But he had been sick for a long time.
I turned 47 that day. The birthday I got 26 years to plan. I did watch the entire trilogy twice, timing the start of part 2 both times, so Doc's line "at 4.29, Wednesday, October 21" was played up at 4.29 in my timezone (Sweden) the first time, and on California time the second time. :)
@@rexxbailey2764I'm so sorry for your loss!
Biff finally gets straightened out on the "make like a tree" expression. But not before he screws up "screen door on a submarine" (he says battleship).
I didn't catch it--- but also, it makes sense with "battleship" too haha!
Thank you. Of course it isn’t the same, but it does still make sense as something nonsensical.
I was simply agreeing with Cristy.
Commenters should have said it's explained in part 2 rather than spelling it out :)
Excellent as always Cristy. Can you imagine we had to wait 4 years in between Back to the Future and Back to the Future II, then another year for the conclusion of the trilogy. They actually filmed Parts 2 and 3 at the same time to allow for the quicker release. So glad you stopped the previews of Part 3 so you can go into the final chapter with no spoilers, you will enjoy it so much more this way. Well, I have to make like a tree and get out of here..🎄See you in the future (past?). I get all mixed up, too!!
That, and they wanted to finish filming while Michael J. Fox still looked like a teenager.
Hahaha Hi Ron:) Yeah I watched Part 3 and will be uploading it next Monday! See you in your future, MY past (because I already watched it) hahaha
and only about 6 months i thought for 3.
The funny thing is when the original Back to the Future was released in the mid 80's it was meant to be a single movie, with an ending that was meant to be funny. Many people thought the first movie was destined to bomb and the production studio was hoping just to break even, on a project they regretted being involved with. A surprising thing happen though .. the movie became a huge blockbuster hit. When that happened .. the studio was suddenly very interested in making sequels to profit off of the first movie's success. And from that we got episodes 2 and 3.
With that said the first one was my favorite, but I love how the 2nd one ended, with Doc being shot back to 1885 leaving Marty in 1955. The Western Union guy waiting to give him the letter was very good at adding suspense.
Someone's been watching Netflix 😀
"he reminds me of someone..."
That's not an accident, even in the late 80s. This version of Biff is 10000% based on..."someone." ;)
Living in “someone” tower
@@gilbertallard306 Because in the '80s, everybody knew trump was a villain. Several villains were based around him (Super Mario Bros, Time Cop, probably a few others). Fucking wild that there are people who forgot he's a villain. (Or didn't care?)
@@SchulzEricT Trump 2024.
@@SchulzEricT one man’s villain is another man’s President 🤔
odd how that’s true in lots of ways.
@@poolhall9632 Embarrassing that you think being the President prevents somebody from being a villain. As if all the millions of deaths caused by trump is okay because he was President while it happened.
Hello Cristy!😊 The actor that played Marty's father did not appear in this film. The future 2015 version of him is another actor upside down in heavy makeup. The 1955 version of the actor is from extra footage and different angles from the first film. The actor (Crispin Glover) successfully sued Universal for reusing his image without his permission. It also set a precedent for actors in film. The actor did not appear in the film due to failed salary negotiations. Great reactions to your second BTTF film, Cristy!!!!🎬👏👏👏👏
I wish he had been in all 3 movies and wasn’t such an idiot about the movie. He was awesome in it.
Actually Glover didn't want to appear in #2. He had some screwy notions, and objected to "fetishizing material wealth," or some such. There's a reason you didn't see much of him after the first movie.
They offered Glover $125,000 to reprise his role in the second film. He requested a $1 Million Dollar salary, matching the salary of star Michael J. Fox. He received $760,000 as the result of his lawsuit.@@Caseytify
Wait wait wait.... why did George's actor not appear on the other movies? Failed salary negotiations? Did he not expect this to become such a successful trilogy?
@@CristyReacts well noone expected a sequel to the first originaally till it proved itself to be awesome beyond belief
Trivia: In the hoverboard chase scene when the punks fly through the window, a slight miscalculation during the setup caused one of the stunt performers to slam into the concrete pillar to the left of the window instead of going thru the window. This caused her to fall outside onto the solid ground instead of inside where all the padding was setup to catch them safely. As a result she suffered multiple injuries. They kept the accident in the movie and if you watch the scene back you can see her hitting the pillar
WHAT?! is this true?? poor woman
@@CristyReacts Yes, she needed multiple reconstructive surgeries to fix her face, arm and hand. She continued to work in film after that. (Sadly, she and her husband were fatally shot by her ex-husband in 2020.)
@@CristyReacts Yep it's true, something reactors don't seem to know about.
They better have used the shot. I’d be pissed if I jacked up my face as a stuntman and they opted for a “better shot”!
@@yourlifeisagreatstory well. 2nd take wasn't an option with that stunt person in a reasonable timeframe
It's fun to see what people in the 80's got wrong about the 2000s. But even more fun is to realize how much they got right. Flat TVs, video conferencing, voice activated appliances, biometrics, smartwatches, VR headsets... So much stuff that did not exist in the 80's, but now is so common we don't even recognize that someone had to come up with that for the movie.
Yea, reminds me of a quote from Nikola Tesla in 1927 where he pretty much perfectly described the modern smartphone and the internet.
"When wireless is perfectly applied the whole earth will be converted into a huge brain, which in fact it is, all things being particles of a real and rhythmic whole. We shall be able to communicate with one another instantly, irrespective of distance. Not only this, but through television and telephony we shall see and hear one another as perfectly as though we were face to face, despite intervening distances of thousands of miles; and the instruments through which we shall be able to do this will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone. A man will be able to carry one in his vest pocket."" - Nikola Tesla, January 30th, 1927.
THAT'S NOT AT ALL HOW YOUR REALITY WORKS! 😑😒
Tbh I would've guessed the same if I was in 80s too coz innovation was going up so fast from 50's to 80's but suddenly we have declined so hard in innovation part. People are using their thoughts in nonsensical things nowadays.
@@ZoroClutchTDM Is that really so, or are we just used to the innovation so we don't even perceive it as innovative? I mean, we all carry a miniature supercomputer in our pocket, connected to basically anyone in the world and the sum of human knowledge. You can also talk to anyone in the world in an instant. In the 80s, if we were curious about something and didn't have a book on that topic at home, we basically just accepted that this knowledge is out of bounds. Today you can learn anything about everything. And that's the big stuff, but just looking around me, the flat screen would be absurd in the 80s, so would be voice operated lights, a 5+1 speaker setup would be understandable but not common, a wireless mouse, keyboard and headphones would be shocking, being able to order stuff from the other side of the world and have it delivered in a week... and so on, and so on. There was plenty of innovation I think. But once it becomes a daily object it stops feeling innovative.
Rich Biff reminds you of "someone" because that "someone" was the actual inspiration for his character.
the first one did so well in the theaters that they shot BTTF2 and 3 concurrently, so they were able to include a preview for 3 at the end of 2. You did well not to watch it, but at the same time, it would only whet your appetite to watch 3. Such a great trilogy, and thanks for taking us along on your journey seeing them for the first time. I love being able to relive these experiences with reactors...it's almost like I get to watch them again for the first time. Easily some of my favorite movies of all time.
They had an idea for one sequel, but realized it was getting way too long to be just one movie, it had to be split in two.
Cristy: He reminds me of someone. 18:21
Doc: Yes you right, that's why we need to go back to 1985 and fix this problem in order to get the 2015 we all remember.
Me: I'm in
13:53 actually in this case, the writers decided that because movies and show _always_ get the future wrong when they try to depict it, and it wouldn't almost immediately look dated; Bob Zemeckis and Bob Gale decided to intentionally satirize their depiction of the future, making it over the top and gaudy. I think the best dig about this is whenever they talk about money in 2015 everything is ridiculously large amounts, even by today's real world standards. Doc tells Marty to go to the cafe and get a Pepsi, and gives him a $50. The guy collecting money to save the clock tower asks Marty to "thumb a hundred bucks" in contrast 1985 when Marty gave a quarter in part I. It's not just the idea that things get more expensive over time, but inflation was a big concern in the late 80s; not unlike how it is now.
I think it was a brilliant move, because it gave them freedom to come up with such intentionally silly ideas about the future; like "dust repellent paper" and kids wearing their clothes inside out; people wearing suits wear two ties. The scenery channel. The dehydrated pizza that can be rehydrated and enlarged to a fully cooked delivery style pizza. The voice activated stuff in Marty's home is great, especially because it lent to some great double-meaning word play. The cops telling her it's dangerous to enter without lights on, and she just repeats it because she has no idea what they're talking about, but she unwittingly voice activates the lights - which we can now do with Alexa or the like. The thumb scan stuff is good too. I vaguely remember biometrics always seeming like the next big thing, and it still seems like people are still trying to make it happen; but this movie has so much fun with that concept, from using it to pay for transactions, opening doors. A great little Easter Egg has to be the newspaper talking about people getting their thumbs cut off, because naturally a world using something like that for security or financial access could conceivably lead to people at least stealing other people's thumbprints if not their actual thumb.
Oh cool... I love that you summarized all the "modern" stuff that the writers came up with. And I also heard it was meant to be sort of a joke, but I'm surprised how many things they got right!
@@CristyReacts Oh yeah, and director Robert Zemeckis, who I guess has a penchant for pranks, gave a deadpan comment in a behind the scenes interview when the movie first came out that "hoverboards were real," and that they were just being kept from the public by a concerned parents group, but that production had managed to get their hands on a few of them for the movie. This lead some kids and parents to call retail stores asking if hoverboards were in stock, followed by deep disappointment.
@@stargazer1682 Right. An no one in 1985 ever thought the Cubs would win the World Series.
Thief to Alexa: "Transfer all of my money to THIS account..."
Alexa: "Done."
@@PhilBagels hadn't happened in like 82 years at the point they filmed it. i'm pretty sure most people thought hell would freeze over before that happened
Just here to once again recommend "Who Framed Roger Rabbit"
Also: yeah, I think BttF 2 is the best one. The way it weaves the story around the first one is fucking genius. The 3rd movie doesn't do that, it's its own thing. Which is part of why I don't like it as much, however I acknowledge that it was the right thing to do; there's just no way to do that a 2nd time.
So... I think 3 is the "worst" one, but they're all good, and 3 is definitely a very satisfying ending to a really fun trilogy.
"Be careful in the future."
God I love the writing in this movie.
Interesting! I really liked Part 3 (coming up next monday) but it really tied everything together for me. However, I still think that the trilogy as a whole has incredible plot and writing.
There's an interesting theory that Marty actually dies a few different times in this movie. Once when he's on the roof and again when he's getting to the end of the tunnel. It actually makes sense why else would Doc be there for no reason? Nobody told him to be there but he was still ready for it.
Yep. I happen to really love this theory.
Cristy, did you notice that Grandma Loraine opened up a frozen pizza made by Pizza Hut ? they never got into the frozen pizza business, but when this movie came out, they were a big restaurant where you could sit down and they had hanging lights with stained glass? covers or maybe just red see through covers? and placemats and a salad bar , and they gave out special sunglasses that people were wearing in the future cafe in the beginning of the movie.
6:20 We can't even trust people to drive cars on the road correctly. How do you expect people to fly cars?
I seen this at the movies when it first came out and still love it!
Maybe you should have stayed home and studied English grammar instead. 🙄
The To Be Continued at the end of 1 was meant to be a time related joke. When asked about it later they pointed out if they had intended to make a sequel they wouldn't have put Jennifer in the car. They go out of their way to workaround her being there at the start.
Yep. That ushers in the beginning of the "issues" that the sequels have in that the writing and script just aren't as tight as the first one. The question of "Why even bring Jennifer in the first place?" comes up right away since it's very obvious they didn't want her there. Next comes the question of "Why take her out of the Delorean and leave her in the alley?" She's already asleep. Just leave her in the car lol. Where did Doc even need to go so urgently and alone when he was just stressing the importance of this mission in particular? Where did Marty's sudden hang up with name calling come from?? Seems very out of nowhere for the character. At the end of the movie, why on earth doesn't Doc just PARK THE DAMN DELOREAN??? It's pretty shocking that these sequels still turned out to be so entertaining because the studio clearly rushed them into getting produced.
@@stephenpatterson8056 there's a fanon type theory that his problem with being called a chicken is a ripple effect on his psyche having grown up with a more assertive George and attentive Lorraine. As for your last point about "why didn't he just park" it's not like he wasn't trying. He tells Marty he's basically gonna try to maneuver down a different way because the air was getting kinda choppy. Before he can, he gets hit. It's definitely a bit conveniently inconvenient but they at least tried to give a reason on that one.
@@stephenpatterson8056 Clearly they take her out of the car for the sake of her being picked up by police and "brought home" for the jokes of her seeing the future family.
@@treetopjones737 I know. That's the point. It's only done to serve the plot of the movie and create a conflict. In actuality it makes no logical sense that they would have taken a knocked out teenage girl and just dumped her in an alley for God knows what to happen to her, when she could have just stayed in the car. The first movie doesn't have (that I can think of) any events that feel forced in that manner.
@@stephenpatterson8056 if she woke up without them and panicked she could have damaged the delorean
Love your reaction. The best trilogy , for me , is the Lord of the Rings.
You don't like Biff shows the characters doing his job what's amazing about this film is it uses the same actors so many times There's one scene where "Marty" is playing 3 people
Yep I think this was my favorite part. Seeing the same actors play themselves in other ages or their family members.
Nike actually finished developing the self lacing technology and created a limited number of the shoes from back to the Future part 2. Nike unveiled this on October 21st 2015. And Michael j Fox was the first one to receive a pair. And the rest were auctioned off And the proceeds went to aid in fighting Parkinson's disease
5:03 We had Google Glass, we got big TVs with multi view, we got Skype calls. There is actually quite a bit of things here, you just don't notice it, cause everyone's always on about the hoverboard.
13:52 Well, not really. Zemeckis was sure they were gonna get it wrong, so just did whatever looked cool.
18:22 Yes, that was the point. Course back then he was millionaire and hasn't led a country yet.
The 80’s was a very optimistic period, all this modern tech was coming in, credit was all over, the economy was decent, the Soviet Union had cracks in it and… we had music on TV! I think most of us yearn for that type of feeling all over, not to mention all the fantastic music and movies we had, all the time, everywhere.
Great reaction and if you want to know how Marty gets back to the Future, watch the next one with a special message from the Doc to everyone.
When they did the main hoverboard sequence, they used multiple different special effect techniques from one shot to the next. Part of the idea was that if someone thought they figured out how they were doing it, suddenly the next shot would be impossible to do in that way.
If I recall correctly, Zemeckis even jokingly claimed that they had to actually make a real hoverboard for the movie. Some rather silly people took him seriously. As if they wouldn’t find a market for such technology, regardless of whether it was deemed unsafe, and too expensive to be practical for recreational applications.
@@0okamino yes, during a behind-the-scenes feature for Entertainment Tonight, he jokingly talked about the board as if it were something that Mattel was almost ready to start selling, and Mattel was inundated with calls and letters asking about it.
Thanks for your reaction--of course they missed the mark a bit for the future, but you have to watch it from an 1980's persective. I remember at school when the first movie came out, kids were talking about flying cars for year 2000, so in a sense, it made sense. I won't spoil anything for you, but uf you watch the 3rd one, you'll understand more about some characters (Needles) and it ties all loose ends. Have a nice day.
Either I missed it in her first reactions comments or no one mentioned it, and I haven't see it yet here, but nobody has mentioned who plays Needles... Flea from the Red Hot Chili Peppers....
1. It's not often sequels hold up to the original, but this does. Thank you 1980s.
2.This one is the best of the bunch. The next one is inventive but I'm not really into the story. That said, it is the perfect wrap.
3. The stunt woman that flew into the glass window partially missed and injured her arm.
4. Michael J. Fox also played Marty's daughter.
5. Sammy Hagar, "I can't drive 55"😎
6. Good thing Biff shoots like a Star Wars Stormtrooper🤣
7. The tunnel at the end is the same one they used for Tune Town in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit".
Interesting....! I actually *just* watched Pt 3 (coming up next monday) and I LOOOVED it! I think it helped explain a lot of what happened throughout. Plus, it was so fun to watch!
I think Part 3 was my favorite. BTW, Mary Steenbergen (Clara) was in the 1979 movie "Time After Time," in which she also falls in love with a time traveler. (In real life, too; she married her co-star, Malcolm McDowell.)
Ad7 note that "They" refers to same guys, as both Back to the future and Roger Rabbit were directed by Robert Zemeckis, produced by Steven Spielberg (hence Jaws joke) and starred Christopher Lloyd.
Just pointing it out.@@mancubwwa
They were off by a few years with the Cubs winning the World Series (and the expansion team in Miami), but they got 80s nostalgia, biometrics, and big screen TVs right. I'm still waiting for my hoverboard...😢
Only one year off. 😀 The Cubs won the following year in 2016, however they were in the playoffs during 2015, which led to a LOT of excitement among BttF fans. I'm still amazed that the Florida Marlins turned into the Miami Marlins just three years prior (2012).
Thanks for your reaction, now TRUST ME.
I watch reaction videos since one year or so and i know the first titles people are looking for.
You could just ignore my advice and start polls or whatever, but you will just lose a lot of time and the movies will be the same ones.
Ok, so...
1-The godfather
2-The good, the bad and the ugly
3-Shawshank redemption
4-The exorcist
5-The dark knight.
6-Forrest Gump
7-Rambo
-Rocky.
Sooner or later, anyone doing reaction videos will watch these ones. Don't watch them one after another, these are big titles you can pick, like, once in a month. If you can, please, would you start either with "the exorcist" or with "the good, the bad and the ugly"? If you do, I promise I will subscribe and click like to any of your videos, even those I will never watch. If you don't, well, keep up the bad work, honey. Bye.
Don't be afraid to say it... Yes.. he reminded you of Donald Trump right? Well.. That's exactly what they did for Biff in this movie... they modeled RICH BIFF after Donald Trump on purpose. So yeah.. you didn't actually say it.. but I know Donald Trump was exactly who you were thinking.. and you would be correct! lol
My favorite line in the entire trilogy is Biff telling Old Biff to get the hell out of his car old man😂
Floating skateboards would be really cool, but what we're shown violates all known physics. If they are possible which seems very unlikely, they are likely to be many many decades away. The closest thing would be a "personal hovercraft", but it'd be far, far larger, slower, less responsive than we see here, and prohibitively expensive. And probably wouldn't be tolerated on a street _or_ sidewalk.
The flying car thing i get. Because if you get into a wreck, you're only going one direction...down. and survival would be essentially impossible
How could have Biff faced everyone on Monday morning at school, hungover and bruised up by George McFly?
Biff from bad 1985 reminding you of "someone" is actually entirely intentional; that *someone* has been around and a wellknown douche for a long time, and rich Biff was modeled on him
A joke most people don’t get, is when Doc says “the skyway is jammed”. How the hell can the skyway be jammed???
Many couldn’t even operate a fax machine in 1989. They were way more popular in the 90’s as I remember.
Si quieres saber que pensaban en los 60's sobre el futuro, tienes que ver la serie de dibujos animados The Jetsons o Los Supersónicos, vas a alucinar. Me gustó nuevamente tu reacción a esta película, por cierto, eres muy hermosa. Saludos desde Ciudad de Guatemala en Centro América.
I love how we had flying cars in 2015 but also were still using fax machines. LOL
BTW the guy who plays Biff (Tom Wilson) has his own UA-cam channel. He doesn't post too often but when he does its usually a fun video (vlog). He's really a super nice guy in real life and is a totally underrated performer.
It’s really funny that the actor playing Biff is is a super sweet person in real life. He had a hard time playing such a jerk.
Docs experience definitely changed him, as he flips on Marty for his almanac plan. In the first, when right before the Libyans showed up and he was about to go to the future, he tells Marty "I'll also be able to see who wins the next 25 World Series."
not sure if he wanted to bet on them though. he could have just been a baseball fan
Went to see this at the cinema the weekend it opened, it was so popular there was a mini crush of people queuing outside, it was chaos, it had only been four years since the first movie but I felt like I’d waited for a sequel forever!
Where back to the future and other movies that attempted to predict the future went wrong is that they thought we would have an incredible tech revolution in hardware and gadgets. In the physical stuff. They didn't see that most of the technology would be more focused on software and virtual.
There's some solid arguments from some physicist, engineers and futurists (in general) claiming we should have even more physical technology advancements but for a few reasons we don't have them. They bring up that that there was a sudden boom around WWII and then it seemed to bottleneck in the 80's. Some things were simply not funded for economic reasons or political reasons like nuclear energy and cold fusion. The patient system, itself, bottlenecks innovation since it controls independent inventors and engineers work from other independent creators but Grant's a monopoly for mega corporations. Then there's the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 that the government uses to lock down new scientific work for the sake of "national security."
The software and digital world was allowed to push on since it was basically a service based technology that created comfort and convenience for the user but also allowed a level of surveillance and control for the government and mega corporations to use. It's all stuff that compels the user to give up more and more autonomy whereas physical technology would give use more autonomy.
The mainstream internet we know today got started about 1995, and wasn't in heavy use at that time. It was dial-up, slower speed.
For logical reasons there is no copyright on electronic circuitry design, which has allowed progress to NOT be controlled by one company ( like Apple and smart phones could have been for example ).
The reason rich biff reminds you of someone is because that’s who they based him on.
No CGI back then. Visual effects were achieved with models, miniatures, optical printing, animatronics, stop-motion photography, editing and lighting tricks.
Don't let people hold you back about enjoying yourself, drink as many glasses of wine as you want 🙃Great video, it's impossible not to love these movies. I hope you watch the 3rd one soon.
Thank you ad Cheers! :) Yes! Just watched it, will be uploaded on Monday!
SIT DOWN! Lmao!😂😂😂That part has always got me.
Love these films but the best trilogy ever is The Lord of The Rings.
Sad recast. The original Jennifer had to fly home to take care of her mom. But, she reprised the role in the Telltale Back to the Future game.
Thnx for the entertainment. Can't wait to see you watch the last part.
Special/Visual Effects back in the day were wild. They literally had to layer effects onto the actual film, and re-record whatever for the effect to show. If you're ever watching an 80s movies, and you see maybe a black outline around whatever the effect is happening, that's the layer, and the line is basically the outline, and or shadow being spliced into the film
"Don't make like a tree..." Nice. That wasn't lost on me.
Recast Jennifer... Elizabeth Shue was near the top of my 80s crush list...
Adventures in Babysitting.
I always thought that instead of writing a letter to Marty in 1955, he could have written a letter to himself, explaining everything that was going to occur so he could be prepared for it.
Rare instance of the Doc not thinking 4-dimensionally.
To be honest I would’ve rip out the pages of 5-8 years of sports information before burning the book.
listen, same. same same same.
Omg you're my new favorite review watcher. Iove the way you react. I'm subscriber.
Stooopppp this make me so happy!! Welcome to the party! New fun videos coming up soooo soon!
Another time travel movie you might like is one of my favorites, The Final Countdown (1980) The U.S.S. Nimitz goes back to December 6th, 1941. It's filmed on the Nimitz. It's like Top Gun meets Back to the Future.
Yes! I loved that one!
None of the things from the future were supposed to be "predictions", they're jokes. They wanted to replicate the skateboard scene from the first movie, so... hoverboards. After the action set piece were Marty jumps into the water they had to get him dry again, so... self-drying clothes. You don't think people in the mid 80ties thought that we would be wearing 2 ties in the future or that all lawyers would be abolished.
Yeahhh I like to know they were meant as jokes, because it was funny to see people wearing TWO TIES lol.
Back in the 80s that was probably animated if I recall. I mean literally EVERYONE who watched this movie when it came out saw that trailer at the end, really no reason not to. Don't know why people are like that.
The "person Biff reminds you of" was a direct inspiration for the character...
People had a more optimistic outlook on the future in almost every form of science fiction. _Back to the Future, The Jetsons, Space: 1999, etc_
The main reason for this was that during the period between the 1950s & the 1990s, America was experiencing exponential economic & technological growth. The 80s saw the advent of video games, the home computer, cell phones, the Internet, CDs, cassette tapes, cable TV, VHS home camcorders, etc. So many of the predictions for what 2015 would be like were based on the assumption that such explosive growth would continue.
Unfortunately, 9/11 was a major turning point for America. In a matter of hours, that cheerful optimism that we'd carried for five decades was ripped away from us. Technology has obviously continued to advance since 2001, but relatively speaking the advances we've made in the last 20 years aren't nearly as ground-breaking as those seen in the 80s. The advent of social media for example, is now considered somewhat of a blessing and a curse. Faster internet speeds, and of course, modern cell phones that are more powerful than home PCs in the 90s.
The TV series about this huge nuclear explosion on the moon threw that satellite out of its orbit is _optimistic!?_ The physics of that show were absurd.
This is really great insight!
@@Caseytify I'm referring to the predicted technological advancements of the time, not the plot of the series, FFS. You're kind of missing the elephant in the room here.
The series was set in 1999 and humans had a BASE ON THE MOON. Space travel had become the norm. The cast was diverse, so like _Star Trek,_ humans had already moved past trivial squabbles about race, religion, etc.
So yeah, VERY optimistic.
Read my FAX! lol. I like how they created reasons for Doc & Marty not to be seen in the alternate universe. Doc is locked up and Marty is in Europe.
This was meant to be 2015 😂😂😂😂
18:21 I don't know who you're talking about but this version of Biff was based on Trump.
There’s a deleted scene where when Old Biff changes the future he starts to disappear. Like his body starts to ache and sees that he’s fading away. A little bit horrifying.
Biff reminds me of Trump in this movie
it's hard to concentrate on the movie with you sitting there looking so goooooooooood!!
no waayyyyy you're just saying that now
@@CristyReacts You a tasty lil snack, grrrrrrrl!!
What movie? All I saw was a beautiful face drinking wine.
I'd recommend searching UA-cam for side-by-side edits of the end of Part One and the opening of Part Two. It's fascinating.
Interestiiinnngggg i'm definitely going to! thanks charlie:)
That’s a different Girl
Last I checked they have invented flying cars, just not really a thing yet.
Magnifica segunda parte, una de las mejores segundas partes jamás hecha! A mi, lo que más me sorprende de la visión futurista de la sociedad es esa tremenda televisión pantalla plana colgada de la pared, y las videoconferencias! acertaron perfectamente ahí. Saludos desde Chile y nos vemos en la tercera parte!
Nos vemos el otro lunes!
the guy that fixed biffs car with the manure bill is the voice of Roger Rabbit!
Wrong guy. Charles Fleischer, the voice of Roger Rabbit, was the old man who told Marty that he wished he could go back in time and bet on the Cubs.
@@bobbuethe1477 he’s also the mechanic.. it’s the same character as an old man and a young man .. Terry is his name
@@CaptNRetro Huh. I never realized that! Thanks.
@@bobbuethe1477This was also the intented reason to why Biff picked Nov 12, 1955, to travel to. In a deleted scene (or possibly never shot, I don't remember) the scene continued with Biff turning up talking to Terry there, and Terry saying something about Biff always being cheap, and reminding how he had made a deal in order to skip having to pay for the work on his car, that Saturday in 1955, the same day the courthouse clock was struck by lightning.
I really like Biff's character/acting in the 3rd movie!
The irony is that Thomas Wilson (Biff) is really a very nice guy by all reports.
Man the nostalgia. I think I was 10 or 11 when this came out. Favorite trilogy of all!! Thanks for this!
Technically hover boards exist. The Hendo Hoverboard. It big and clunky and only hovers over a special material.
oh iNTERESTIINNGGG im gonna look it up!
6:20 One flying car has been recently approved by the FAA. The thing is, it's just to dangerous. A car accident on the ground is bad enough, what happens if you crash in the air? What if the engine stalls? Does anyone think normal people are going to go through a pre-flight checklist every time they get in the car?
Who makes it? What kind of propulsion does it use?
I can guarantee it doesn't have hovering anti-gravity engines shown in the movie.
28:11 Maybe he added it to his coffee. Never heard of an Irish Coffee?
"He reminds me of someone" lol, yup, we all see the same thing
Make like a tree, that never leaves.
Keeps you cool, but doesn’t throw shade.
Provides fruit, and just the right amount of heavy breathing,
Gives you something strong and rooted to lean your back against.
Hey I love this! did you write this poem? :)
@@CristyReacts
I did, I did. Thank you.
It started simply as me playing off of the humor of the meme that “make like a tree” had become on the channel. I’m glad you liked it.
Their future is like exaggerated 80's with a Sci-Fi twist it's like us trying to imagine 2050's
So far, I agree! Let's see what the rest of Phase 2 brings.
Great reaction Cristy! Keep em coming and I'll keep watching them. Luvin it.
For me this is the 3rd best of the trilogy. But it's probably my favorite trilogy...
How so? You think there are better trilogies that you like less?
Love your reaction, can't wait for you to do Part 3
Shame you didn't include Elijah Wood as the kid in 2015 that watches Marty play the videogame
Ahhhh i didn't notice Elijah Wood at all!!!
@@CristyReacts ahh never mind. You'll still love part 3 :)
CPR was invented in 1960, it wasn't endorsed until 1963, it wasnt was Nationonally recognized or researched until 1966, in 1972 they started training people, and in 1975 they finally published the first ACLS CPR book
recognized Needles?... it's Flea from the Red Hot Chili Peppers.... (Also in Part 3)
After seeing you've watched these movies and Princess Bride, I think you would very much enjoy "Labyrinth"
To do the flying car they used motion controlled cameras to film a miniature and then used a machine called an optical compositor that makes a matte for the car and then on another run it combines the car, the matte and the footage to merge everything together. It was a hell of a process to do that stuff before CGI got to the point where it could do a "better" job.
Oh so cool.... thanks for the insight. It's always hard to imagine how they did things when a certain tech didn't exist. Thanks for letting me know:)
October 21, 2015. National League Championship Series (playoffs) NY Mets 8, Chicago Cubs 3. New York won the series. It's not exactly like the movie, but strange, huh?
USA TODAY: 3 Billion Readers...😂😂😂😂
That aged badly.
The best trilogy?
Let's talk about "The" original trilogy. Guess which one...
And then talk about the best trilogy that won 11 Oscars.
But it still remains the coolest trilogy! 😉
6:20 - FLYING CARS? Never will there be an infrastructure set up for flying vehicles. No way.
Before you think of flying cars, think of a stormy night with heavy rain, thunder and lightning. Now think about how lightning conductors operate. Lightning conductors are positioned uppermost in a cityscape so they're first to receive lightning strikes. All flying vehicles would need to operate above the city skyline, therefore allowing themselves to become instant targets for lightning strikes.
ADDITIONAL...
The current infrastructure of roads keeps the movement of vehicles contained withn a two-dimensional (x & y axis) space. The same can be said for the railway system. However, when it comes to flying cars, some form of air traffic control would be essential (x & y & z axis). Imagine if, for every instance of travel, a flying car had to submit a flight plan. Would every flying car need a 'transponder'? How would a country's border security be maintained? Would every flying car need a 'passport'?
RTA or ATA?
With a road traffic accident, all resulting debris is strewn across a single plane, ie. the road. However, with an air traffic accident, debris is strewn across three dimensions. Also... a faulty or suddenly non-functioning road vehicle can pull over to the side of the road whereas a faulty or suddenly non-functioning air vehicle WILL fall out of the sky.
POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO.
To be able to hover, the downforce required to keep a vehicle weighing multiple tonnes afloat in the air, is phenomenal, However, for flying cars to be of practical use, they would certainly need to hover.. Otherwise we're going to need a tonne of 'runways' for take-offs and landings.
CONCLUSION - There are significantly more reasons against having a 'flying car' infrastructure than for it. Forget there ever becoming a time when vehicles are 'piloted' in the same way they are in, 'The Jetsons' or 'BTTF'. Never gonna happen.
Yes, casino Biff is based on exactly who you think he’s based on. 🤦🏻♂️ it’s disturbing
I once bought an outdoor jacket solely because looked like Marty’s 2015 Jacket.
I even say the phrases when I put it on. 😅
Rotoscoping and visual effects started in the 70s
I don't even ride skateboards, and I'm mad that we still don't have hoverboards yet!
Saaaame!! I only don’t ride skateboards because they don’t hover!!🤣🤣🤣
Same here! But I love that a fellow Swede, Per Welinder, did skateboarding stunts for MJF in the first movie. His mom's sister even married a distant relative of mine. :)