DT Convolution-Two Exponentials Part 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 вер 2024
  • Shows how to compute the discrete-time convolution of two exponential signals. Part 1.
    This video was created to support EGR 433:Transforms & Systems Modeling at Arizona State University. Links to other videos can be found at www.engineering... and sites.google.co...
    This video is made available under the Creative Commons BY-SA license.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @dilusion25
    @dilusion25 11 років тому

    Thanks you so much Mr Darryl, last semester i find this to be most boring and un-attractive i have in my life but with your concise and excellent way of teaching this, i now realise signals and systems is kinda interesting. i am electrical and electronics engineering am in second year, got my exams in january hopefully i will ace this course, thanks to you. you're a life saver, God bless.

  • @papayeyaz
    @papayeyaz 11 років тому

    Thank you Dr. Darryl. Bless you :)

  • @SuperFTH1
    @SuperFTH1 11 років тому

    Many thanks for this useful tutorial!

  • @TamerSMostafa
    @TamerSMostafa 8 років тому

    Good video. Thank you.

  • @papayeyaz
    @papayeyaz 11 років тому

    If I may Dr. Darryl.
    Ibrahim Sir was explaining the concept of Convolution for Discrete Systems.
    WHy you need it. Well we need Convolution whenever we need to know what is he output that our system will produce if we give it some inputs we want to test it.
    Knowing that you know already the output of your system to a single impulse. Which you call it Impulse Response of a System h[n].

  • @DarrylMorrell
    @DarrylMorrell  11 років тому

    The goal for the computation is to compute the convolution of two signals. My video "DT LTI System Response-Convolution" gives an explanation of one reason why you might want to compute the convolution of two signals.

  • @Iberedmas
    @Iberedmas 12 років тому

    What is your goal for all this calculation? Is it to find a straight line or what?

  • @alitariq3671
    @alitariq3671 4 роки тому

    I guess you failed to explain the summation limits @ 4:32 why did we chose upper limit to be "n" ?