Thank you for this podcast describing the type of genitive case in Titus 2:13!!! Ive been having trouble understanding the different genitive style, at least now I understood a bit more. I for one though adheres to the interpretation that Jesus Christ is the glory of our The great God and Saviour.. it is Jesus who we are waiting for to appear. It's not just grammatically correct (as said in the podcast and Im glad that a professional backed this up) but also coherent with the whole message of Paul, not just in Titus but in all his letters! So Syntax + Semantics synchronized together is a big THIS IS THE TRUTH for me. ^^ Thank you for this. God bless you all!
The CONTEXT makes all clear!Tit 2:13 is NOT speaking of ONE but two SEPERATE persons! Read the intro at Titus 1:1; "Paul a servant of God AND an apostle of Jesus Christ" ( KJV) TWO, not One persons mentioned! Paul frequenly blessings in his epistles at 2 Cor 1:3, Col 1:3, Eph 1;3 all read "Blessed be the God AND FATHER OF the Lord Jesus Christ". Paul then obviously did NOT call Jesus God for he stated "The head of Christ is GOD" ( 1 Cor 11:3. Amen! 0 Also 1 Cor 8:6 is clear The Father is Supreme!
@@letthebiblespeak8250 McReynolds has it this way: Titus 2:13 “awaiting the fortunate hope and appearance of the splendor of the great God and deliverer of us Jesus Christ.” “of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ” is a prepositional phrase. Jesus is both God and Savior. I'm going with that.
As for the complaint that Christ is not called often God, well neither the Father is called often Kyrios which is the Greek Rendering for Yahweh, so what? For James there is no difference, here it is: James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ... You see, the Son in Human nature (Jesus stands for that in the Bible, human nature), is the Lord/ Master of James in the exactly same way as God Why is James the Servant of the Son of Man? Simply because the Son of Man is also the only begotten Son of God.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you for this podcast describing the type of genitive case in Titus 2:13!!! Ive been having trouble understanding the different genitive style, at least now I understood a bit more.
I for one though adheres to the interpretation that Jesus Christ is the glory of our The great God and Saviour.. it is Jesus who we are waiting for to appear.
It's not just grammatically correct (as said in the podcast and Im glad that a professional backed this up) but also coherent with the whole message of Paul, not just in Titus but in all his letters!
So Syntax + Semantics synchronized together is a big THIS IS THE TRUTH for me. ^^
Thank you for this. God bless you all!
Granville sharps rule cannot be used with titus 2:13. Fact. Check it out.
ua-cam.com/video/vammUDLrXUM/v-deo.html
The CONTEXT makes all clear!Tit 2:13 is NOT speaking of ONE but two SEPERATE persons! Read the intro at Titus 1:1; "Paul a servant of God AND an apostle of Jesus Christ" ( KJV) TWO, not One persons mentioned! Paul frequenly blessings in his epistles at 2 Cor 1:3, Col 1:3, Eph 1;3 all read "Blessed be the God AND FATHER OF the Lord Jesus Christ". Paul then obviously did NOT call Jesus God for he stated "The head of Christ is GOD" ( 1 Cor 11:3. Amen! 0 Also 1 Cor 8:6 is clear The Father is Supreme!
There is not context that violates the language!
The langage 100% percent forbids a second person!
Only the KJV and the NKJV use the flawed English rendering. The others are correct.
@@Imsaved777 It is the glory that would be seen. God is invisible.
Granville sharps rule cannot be used with titus 2:13. Fact. Check it out.
ua-cam.com/video/vammUDLrXUM/v-deo.html
@@letthebiblespeak8250 McReynolds has it this way:
Titus 2:13 “awaiting the fortunate hope and appearance of the splendor of the great God and deliverer of us Jesus Christ.”
“of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ” is a prepositional phrase. Jesus is both God and Savior. I'm going with that.
As for the complaint that Christ is not called often God, well neither the Father is called often Kyrios which is the Greek Rendering for Yahweh, so what?
For James there is no difference, here it is:
James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ...
You see, the Son in Human nature (Jesus stands for that in the Bible, human nature), is the Lord/ Master of James in the exactly same way as God
Why is James the Servant of the Son of Man?
Simply because the Son of Man is also the only begotten Son of God.
Grammatically is not "less likely" , but "impossible" to refer to another person other than Jesus!