Chapter 3: Every asset has an intrinsic value!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 25

  • @Logosdao
    @Logosdao 8 місяців тому +2

    Thanks Prof. Aswath Damodar, your generosity makes us believe in humanity.

  • @manuelcheta
    @manuelcheta 9 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for putting all these videos online. Been following them for year. A minor correction for the last applied formula (around time 24:24) "The cost of capital is a weighted average of the two, with the weights based upon the market value": in the formula it should be -> 9.02%*(44.8 / (44.8 + 19.5)), in the video the formula is multiplying instead of dividing the equity and total book value -> 9.02% * (44.8 * (44.8+19.5)). See "/" vs "*".Thanks for all your hard work and for publishing the courses.

    • @36boys.
      @36boys. 8 місяців тому

      Do you know how Damodaran come up with ERP 5.67% for KHC. I am trying to do valuation for HD. please help appreciate. thanks

    • @Viktor_Shcherbyna
      @Viktor_Shcherbyna 8 місяців тому

      @@36boys. It is equity return minus risk free rate. It can be S&P500 minus gov.bonds rate. Professor talks about "geografical region where the company operates", so it could be local equity index (instead of S&P500).

    • @JoseRodriguez-ze7xt
      @JoseRodriguez-ze7xt 5 місяців тому

      Hi, newbie here. Where did the Professor get the 19.5 millions in debt? Can't find it

  • @Stormyinc_
    @Stormyinc_ 8 місяців тому +2

    There is another error in the discontinued computation at 33 min it should be divided in stead of multiplied in the formula from year 6 to get the discount factor.

  • @sheanathan3566
    @sheanathan3566 8 місяців тому

    it is super helpful to watch these videos after reading each chapter. It helps clarify lots of things and thinking behind the approaches. I have to say I was stymied by the 6Y number at (32:00) and the clarification to 11 year on the video is a good example. Thanks for the book and video series. cheers! Nathan

  • @harshbubna9344
    @harshbubna9344 6 місяців тому

    thank you Professor

  • @Expatriate_1972
    @Expatriate_1972 4 місяці тому

    Thank you, I have just estimated the firm value for Moutai 600519. I don't feel confident about two numbers: the Beta of 0.6 for this firm with a low ratio of free float shares and the revenue growth rates of 8% needed to reach even the current share price.

  • @Sooooooooooorya
    @Sooooooooooorya 7 місяців тому +1

    in 25:21 for computing the cost of capital, the percentage of capital thats equity must be multiplied with the cost of equity for the first half of the formula.... I think u forgot to put a "/" symbol . cost of capital= 9.02%(44.8/(44.8+ 19.5))+.... just a minor change lol

  • @Stormyinc_
    @Stormyinc_ 9 місяців тому +1

    I have calculated the value in the table at ca time 32:48 are they all wrong from year 5? Or am i doing something wrong?

    • @DBA174
      @DBA174 7 місяців тому

      I have the same thing! I ended up with results that are similar but not the same. My guess is there are some differences due to rounding or something?
      Especially because the first 5 years my numbers are the same. Which is when the growth rate was a steady 2%.
      So perhaps its the decling growth rate at linear intervals in combination with rounding up or down, that causes the discrepancies after year 5.

  • @dwipbhakti
    @dwipbhakti 4 місяці тому

    minutre 7.34 very lesson learned

  • @abykumar
    @abykumar 8 місяців тому

    Quick clarification: Shouldn’t reinvestment at 11:50 be capex plus change in nwc plus d&a = $4,003 for 2022 vs. $1,224? Or Am I missing something?

    • @36boys.
      @36boys. 8 місяців тому

      2899.93-1675.93=1224

    • @zachary7860
      @zachary7860 16 днів тому

      yea, i believe the goodwill impairment that he added back when doing the FCFF valuation. i also was confused by this at first

  • @36boys.
    @36boys. 4 місяці тому

    can anyone please help me how professor calculated non cash working capital?

    • @krishnarajan9877
      @krishnarajan9877 4 місяці тому

      Add Deferred Tax Assets as well, you will get the answer

  • @dhruvilpatel8440
    @dhruvilpatel8440 8 місяців тому +1

    @Aswath Damodaran Time 10:49 of the video. How did you arrive at the Reinvestment figures? I could not follow that. Any help is much appreciated.

    • @Sooooooooooorya
      @Sooooooooooorya 7 місяців тому

      ((EBIT paid after tax - FCFF) / EBIT paid after tax ) *100

  • @yashrajpal1241
    @yashrajpal1241 6 місяців тому

    i did not understood the part in which he keeps reinvestment rate 10% for stable growth period

  • @elkalash6619
    @elkalash6619 7 місяців тому

    in the book, the debt repaid for 2021 is 7126$ but in the video, it is 8161$, and in 2020 the book has 8813$ but in the video, it is 10655$, does the video have the wrong numbers or does the book?

  • @DBA174
    @DBA174 7 місяців тому

    Does anybody understand how to arrive at change in non-cash WC of -1761? Because I get -1843.
    The way I calculated it was:
    Change in non-cash WC = Change in Current assets - Change in Current liabilities
    Change in CA - Change in CL = (-228 - 1121 - 314) - (152 + 28) = -1663 - 180 = -1843.
    Thanks!

    • @MarcelBirr-g1e
      @MarcelBirr-g1e 7 місяців тому +1

      In the book on page 48 he writes: "Finally, the change in non-cash working capital also includes the cash flow effects of deffered taxes".
      For 2022 the deferred income tax was -278.
      If you ignore the plus and minus signes of the numbers and calculate Changes in Current assets + Deffered income tax - Change in Current liabilities...
      228 + 1121 + 314 + 278 - 152 - 28 = 1761
      ...you'll get the same result for the changes in non-cash WC as in the video / book.

    • @krishnarajan9877
      @krishnarajan9877 4 місяці тому

      Even I do get the same, don't know how the value is -1761