Now I see what everybody says you are the best teacher. I was researching about this topic for a week and couldn't get a clear answer. My guess is a lot of folks who says they understand finance don't know why they are doing what they are doing and just repeat some formula they learned from somebody. Thank you
I've spent years researching this topic as it relates to valuing stocks. Nothing about it is easy or straightforward. Much of the analysis is up to interpretation. Anyone who plugs in numbers into a model and simply regurgitates the result has no clue what he's talking about. Damodaran as always impressed me with his insights since my college days many years ago.
My investing mentor was a student of yours at NYU. I am amazed at his knowledge and breadth of wisdom. As in awe I am of him, he is in awe of you and your wisdom and knowledge you passed on to him. I see and getting the same sense of awe. Thank you again for sharing your knowledge, experience and wisdom.
Dear professor, using your methods and lectures you so generously share with us, I find Meta and Alibaba hugely undervalued. I am aware of all risks and situation in China, but I simply cannot imagine future cash flows that could be so low to justify this market price, especially for Alibaba.
Exceptional Masterclass, a filter for the noise of the stock market. I am convinced many people talk about "cash flows" but don't fully understand the definition.
Excellent. I would add though that: EBIAT (or NOPAT), calculation neglects the effect of the tax shield provided by interest expenses. That is why it’s important to account for this when estimating the cost of debt part of the WACC.
Thank you so much sir . I am an aviation personnel , who recently started a career in value investing to run in parallel . All your videos have refined my views and mental models . Especially these basic fundamental videos have been of profound use to me, I have downloaded it and will be moving to my forever vault . If you could share more videos on basics like balance sheets , p/l statements , reading annual reports , it would be a golden ticket to my future endeavours . Thank you so much. Regards. From India ..
Thank you professor. Could you please work through an example in the Insurance Industry? Like P&C? AND in some textbooks it shows for NWC = CA - CL, Here we specifically exclude Cash to get Non-Cash WC. Why do you prefer this? Or what would be the differences? Thank you for providind this valuable information for free. This is such a great time being alive. Thank you professor!
Thank you for the informative and honest video. Perhaps a frame of reference for pricing based on cash flows could be the sector/group/category that the sector is in. By comparing a single stock's cash flow with a basket of, say, 10 very similar companies' cash flows, one might get a useful valuation our of the cash flow metric.
Slide 13 might need a correction. At the bottom left, should be value of firm (Value of Operating Assets+Cash+Non Operating Assets). I'm refreshing and updating my knowledge on this on Sunday because you are a great teacher. Thank you for taking the time to do this video.
Professor Damodaran, In order to adjust for "Effect of Foreign Exchange" - Should I treat it like "Net Recognized Gains on Investments and Derivatives"?
I noticed that on the MSFT FCFE calculation the Cash Acquisition value is 8,909 on the CF statement, but in the table it was input as 8,099. Based on this change, the FCFE prior to debt should be 41,091.
can you comment on META valuation professor. their FCF this quarter was less than 100mln since they are savagely spending on Capex. interesting what your valuation is
Hi! Is it possible "Cash acquisitions" on minute 10:50 is incorrect? I think it should be 8909 instead of 8099, leading to a FCFE prior to debt of 41091. Thanks a lot for the lesson.
Keep in mind I am only a layman learning from the professor, but since Microsofts statement clearly says $(8,909) I would assume its a typo on the slides.
Question: The change in non-cash working capital has to be consolidated with signs reversed according to slide p.7. I wonder since it is being taken from the statement of cash flows: Hasn't that switch of signs already been incorporated? In other words, e.g. Microsofts inventories increase to 7,800 from 7,038 the year prior (see balance sheet). This positive increase of +741 is then already reversed to -737 in the statement of cashflows. Therefore I would think the negative effect on Cashflows has been accounted for and it is false to switch it around again. What are your thoughts? Thx 4 your lessons professor !
Okay I think I found my mistake: If you just took the change in non-cash working capital from the statement of cash flows and consolidated it, it is already negative. Hence if you then subtract it from net income, it turns positive which is incorrect. -(-1,086) = +1,086
Are there not taxes involved when you choose to capitalize R&D vs. expense? Expensing R&D should lower taxes whereas capitalizing R&D should increase taxes. I don't think choosing one or the other nets cash flows to zero.
If you capitalise R&D won’t that produce a much higher capex figure than the one MSFT lists in the cash flow statement and thereby produce a lower FCFF? (Sorry for the stupid question, I’m learning!)
The earnings will increase by an equivalent amount. MSFT is more profitable than accountants claim it to be, reinvests more than accountants picture it as reinvesting and earns a more model, albeit still attractive, return on invested capital than the one you see in the financial statements.
I realized that the secret to making a million is saving for a better investment. I always tell myself you don't need that new Maserati or that vacation just yet. That mindset helped me make more money investing. For example last year I invested 80k in stocks (with the help of my Financial Advisor of course) and made about 246k, but guess what? I put it all back and traded with her again and now I'm rounding up close to a million.
The pandemic came and taught everyone the importance of having multiple stream of income, unfortunately having a nice paying job doesn't mean you are financial secured anymore. So we all need to put in an extra-income earning chance, like investments.
I agree with you, Covid taught us the importance of having a plan "B" income. You are not safe with just one paying job, when nobody knows what will happen next. Look at what happened to so many of u...
Thanks for the great video, professor! I rewinded a few times but I cannot get to 19,370 Reinvestment that you explain around 11:00 in MSFT cashflow statement . Can somebody write down the formula for me?
Capex(20.6) + change in non-cash WC(1.08) + cash acquisition(8.09) - non cash gain(-1.2) - Depreciation(11.6). P.S. Non-cash gain that's deducted here is actually a cash re- adjustment(for non operating income in the Income statement that's carried to net income) than a reinvestment,but an essential component that must be included in the calculation of fcff.
@@simtu251as I look at it again, if you're serious about the calculation, above formula is only correct if you begin the fcff calculation with net income [now it gets little complicated, you then need to adjust it for this and interest income and so on]. But here, there's a fractional theorical error in the fcff calculation, when you begin the calculation with operating income [bottom box] that this non-cash, non operating income item shouldn't be included.[Because, in the IS, this non-cash item (that's later been adjusted here) is a line item that sneak up after the operating income, and it's unfair to adjust something that's not initially accounted for]. I hope my judgement is correct here and you'll be able to understand it.✌️
11:25: Wouldn't the effective tax-rate shown on the income-statement be pertinent to the company's taxable-income rather than to its operating income? That is, if taxable-income is markedly lower than operating-income because of the deduction of interest-expense, then the rate listed on the income-statement might be an exaggeration for the purpose of free-cash-flow-to-firm (F.C.F.F.) computation, no?
Thanks a lot for your as always great teaching. Btw, you've entered Microsoft's Aquisitions number incorrectly in your FCFE calculations: 8099 instead of 8909.
Thank you for pointing this out, I checked multiple times my calculation. Now I see this is the error, that's why it's not matching with the professor.
@@sureshyaso Many Thanks! I came to the same conclusion. A transpose error. Incidentally, do you know how he came up with the $19, 370 reinvestment number?
@@richardgordon yes here is the break-up of reinvestment numbers: Depreciation & Amort = 11686 +Non-recognised losses (gains) = -1249 -Changes in WC = 1086 -Capex = 20622 -Cash Acquisition = 8099 Net Re-investment = -19370. Hope you got it! all the best
Look for operating income line item in the Income Statement; after gross and operating expenses are deducted from the revenue you get the operating income.
@@stefankrgovic2167 sorry the opposite then. Essentially means after you account for (subtract) the debt. For a common shareholder is FCFF a better metrics?
He's saying that if you are thinking retained earnings then you are going to wrong side of the balance sheet. Retained earnings is not the wrong answer
FCFF is not the cash flow the firm generated if it was 100% equity financed. Because you’re ignoring the fact that operating income is inflated by the benefit of leverage.
Huh? At 3:38 Free Cash Flow does not include working capital needs? Only debt servicing? And what in the world is "expected value added by future investments"? Aswath probably refers to his own portfolio. That slide cannot possibly represent a real business.
Building up inventory to be able to timely satisfy future demand. That is a cash outflow because suppliers want to be paid. But you didn't sell yet, so no corresponding inflow. Generally, when a company grows, it has higher wc needs.
I made my first million from growing my money through stock trading and I totally know nothing about trading, the grace I had was meeting a good broker from a big shark in the financial market, excited
Hey Aarushi, I'm an Indian in California, as a beginner I need urgent help to grow my idle money, please share your broker with me, I would appreciate it.
@@jasminemccumber4694 27k to 777k in 5 months considering the market instability is an impressive result, my uncle an Indian here in the U.S, is lucky working with Mr Monroe because he usually works with the big sharks in stock market
It's hard to believe that knowledge like this is free to consume. Thank you for all the videos you share.
I agree. Thank you very much Aswath.
Is not free, you are paying it with adds or subscription.
A masterpiece of fundamentals
Now I see what everybody says you are the best teacher. I was researching about this topic for a week and couldn't get a clear answer. My guess is a lot of folks who says they understand finance don't know why they are doing what they are doing and just repeat some formula they learned from somebody.
Thank you
I've spent years researching this topic as it relates to valuing stocks. Nothing about it is easy or straightforward. Much of the analysis is up to interpretation. Anyone who plugs in numbers into a model and simply regurgitates the result has no clue what he's talking about. Damodaran as always impressed me with his insights since my college days many years ago.
My investing mentor was a student of yours at NYU. I am amazed at his knowledge and breadth of wisdom. As in awe I am of him, he is in awe of you and your wisdom and knowledge you passed on to him. I see and getting the same sense of awe. Thank you again for sharing your knowledge, experience and wisdom.
Long live Mr. Damodaran, the teacher I would have loved to have during my college years, thank you UA-cam 🙌🏻
Dear professor, using your methods and lectures you so generously share with us, I find Meta and Alibaba hugely undervalued. I am aware of all risks and situation in China, but I simply cannot imagine future cash flows that could be so low to justify this market price, especially for Alibaba.
Likely BABA undervalued also using the earnings power value neglecting growth. Seems actually close to book value at the moment.
@@coachgius exactly!👍
Exceptional Masterclass, a filter for the noise of the stock market. I am convinced many people talk about "cash flows" but don't fully understand the definition.
Many thanks professor, a masterpiece as usual. Thanks a lot for sharing your very valuable knowledge.
Thank you professor, always great to revisit the basics.
Doing Microsoft's Free Cash Flow to Firm, Free Cash Flow to Equity holders in - Microsoft's Excel- Great learning session Prof sir as always
Love his lectures Thanks for doing all this for free 🙏
Excellent. I would add though that: EBIAT (or NOPAT), calculation neglects the effect of the tax shield provided by interest expenses. That is why it’s important to account for this when estimating the cost of debt part of the WACC.
I am forever indebted to you for this level of transparency of wealth of knowledge
Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge, Professor Damodaran. 🙏
Masterpiece. Thank you from Brazil!
Thank you for amazing session :) such a masterpiece. I love the stats about the company where we can see that the theory is valid :)
Thank you! Very helpful! I am saving this to my favorites!
Thank you professor 🙏. Stay blessed always 🙏
Such a great insight knowledge. Thank you so much !
Thank you so much sir . I am an aviation personnel , who recently started a career in value investing to run in parallel .
All your videos have refined my views and mental models .
Especially these basic fundamental videos have been of profound use to me, I have downloaded it and will be moving to my forever vault .
If you could share more videos on basics like balance sheets , p/l statements , reading annual reports , it would be a golden ticket to my future endeavours .
Thank you so much. Regards. From India ..
Thank you Professor Damodaran. It was a very valuable lecture for me.
Thank you for showing the financial papers that you are working from. It helps learners like me.
Thank you so much Sir for the explanations. I'm confident in FCF things now.
Thank you, Prof. Take care. Stay safe. God bless.
Thank you professor, a masterclass for sure
Thank you professor. Could you please work through an example in the Insurance Industry? Like P&C? AND in some textbooks it shows for NWC = CA - CL, Here we specifically exclude Cash to get Non-Cash WC. Why do you prefer this? Or what would be the differences? Thank you for providind this valuable information for free. This is such a great time being alive. Thank you professor!
please don't ever delete this channel, mister!
THANKS PROFESSOR FOR MAKING ME EASY TO BUILD BALANCE SCORECARD FOR STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISE. SUCH A MASTERPIECEEEEEEEEEE
Dear lord so much information to take in as a newbie
Thank you for the informative and honest video. Perhaps a frame of reference for pricing based on cash flows could be the sector/group/category that the sector is in. By comparing a single stock's cash flow with a basket of, say, 10 very similar companies' cash flows, one might get a useful valuation our of the cash flow metric.
39 min with zero fat. excellent
Acquisitions are Capex , thanks Prof. Damodaran!
Awesome! Thank you so much professor.
Slide 13 might need a correction. At the bottom left, should be value of firm (Value of Operating Assets+Cash+Non Operating Assets). I'm refreshing and updating my knowledge on this on Sunday because you are a great teacher. Thank you for taking the time to do this video.
Pure Gold dust, free knowledge flow
A well deserved Masterpiece
Phenomenal refresher! Thank you!
Thank you for the video prof . Why to calculate non cash working capital we use also long-term assets and liabilities?
Great work sir ❤ .. Are you from southern India.... Or living abroad?
Professor Damodaran, In order to adjust for "Effect of Foreign Exchange" - Should I treat it like "Net Recognized Gains on Investments and Derivatives"?
Helo Professor. Time stamp 4:24 to 4:34: pl. confirm if 4:35 s my understanding is correct that net decrease in WC is added back?
Great lesson. Thank you.
What a video. Bravo sir!
A great mind. Thank you 🙏
Thank your sir , loved this session.
Wow. What an insight! Thank you sir!
This was insightful. Thank you
In your next video, can you share about DACF and how EV/DACF is preferable to EV/EBITDA when evaluating oil and gas companies?
I noticed that on the MSFT FCFE calculation the Cash Acquisition value is 8,909 on the CF statement, but in the table it was input as 8,099. Based on this change, the FCFE prior to debt should be 41,091.
Incredibly useful
Thanks for this gift!!
Thank you so much Prof!
You rock dude!!
I mean professor.. you rock professor!
Thanks professor
Now don't start asking/expecting him to use psychic powers
Very informative ❤ thanks for sharing 😊
can you comment on META valuation professor. their FCF this quarter was less than 100mln since they are savagely spending on Capex. interesting what your valuation is
😊
Hi!
Is it possible "Cash acquisitions" on minute 10:50 is incorrect? I think it should be 8909 instead of 8099, leading to a FCFE prior to debt of 41091.
Thanks a lot for the lesson.
Keep in mind I am only a layman learning from the professor, but since Microsofts statement clearly says $(8,909) I would assume its a typo on the slides.
Thanks professor!
Now don't start asking/expecting him to use psychic powers
Question: The change in non-cash working capital has to be consolidated with signs reversed according to slide p.7. I wonder since it is being taken from the statement of cash flows: Hasn't that switch of signs already been incorporated?
In other words, e.g. Microsofts inventories increase to 7,800 from 7,038 the year prior (see balance sheet). This positive increase of +741 is then already reversed to -737 in the statement of cashflows. Therefore I would think the negative effect on Cashflows has been accounted for and it is false to switch it around again. What are your thoughts?
Thx 4 your lessons professor !
Okay I think I found my mistake: If you just took the change in non-cash working capital from the statement of cash flows and consolidated it, it is already negative. Hence if you then subtract it from net income, it turns positive which is incorrect. -(-1,086) = +1,086
Fantastic!
Are there not taxes involved when you choose to capitalize R&D vs. expense? Expensing R&D should lower taxes whereas capitalizing R&D should increase taxes. I don't think choosing one or the other nets cash flows to zero.
thank you 🤝
If you capitalise R&D won’t that produce a much higher capex figure than the one MSFT lists in the cash flow statement and thereby produce a lower FCFF? (Sorry for the stupid question, I’m learning!)
The earnings will increase by an equivalent amount. MSFT is more profitable than accountants claim it to be, reinvests more than accountants picture it as reinvesting and earns a more model, albeit still attractive, return on invested capital than the one you see in the financial statements.
I see- makes sense. (& thanks so much for your swift reply & content!)
thank you very much for the informative vid
Thank you sir.
I realized that the secret to making a million is saving for a better investment. I always tell myself you don't need that new Maserati or that vacation just yet. That mindset helped me make more money investing. For example last year I invested 80k in stocks (with the help of my Financial Advisor of course) and made about 246k, but guess what? I put it all back and traded with her again and now I'm rounding up close to a million.
The pandemic came and taught everyone the importance of having multiple stream of income, unfortunately having a nice paying job doesn't mean you are financial secured anymore. So we all need to put in an extra-income earning chance, like investments.
I agree with you, Covid taught us the importance of having a plan "B" income. You are not safe with just one paying job, when nobody knows what will happen next. Look at what happened to so many of u...
Job will pay your bills, business will make you rich but investment makes and keep you wealthy, the future is inevitable 💵
I'm also a proud beneficiary! I've built my portfolio massively and still building. My weekly earnings from her strategies are mind blowing...
Who's Mrs Camille Anne Hector ?!
Thank you
ty for this video!
Thank you sir
what do you think about buffets' famous owners earning method professor?
What if a company has excellent free cash flow but perhaps has some problems like a negative working capital or negative tangible book value?
Can i assume FCFF is FCFE Prior to debt( $41,901)+ Interest Costs paid during the year?
All great points. I just lost interest to use valuation to make my next investment 😂
Was there a simple copy and paste issue on Cash acquisitions? Should be 8909 instead of 8099
Thanks for the great video, professor!
I rewinded a few times but I cannot get to 19,370 Reinvestment that you explain around 11:00 in MSFT cashflow statement . Can somebody write down the formula for me?
Capex(20.6) + change in non-cash WC(1.08) + cash acquisition(8.09) - non cash gain(-1.2) - Depreciation(11.6).
P.S. Non-cash gain that's deducted here is actually a cash re- adjustment(for non operating income in the Income statement that's carried to net income) than a reinvestment,but an essential component that must be included in the calculation of fcff.
@@kalpaperera1285 Thanks a lot!
@@simtu251as I look at it again, if you're serious about the calculation, above formula is only correct if you begin the fcff calculation with net income [now it gets little complicated, you then need to adjust it for this and interest income and so on].
But here, there's a fractional theorical error in the fcff calculation, when you begin the calculation with operating income [bottom box] that this non-cash, non operating income item shouldn't be included.[Because, in the IS, this non-cash item (that's later been adjusted here) is a line item that sneak up after the operating income, and it's unfair to adjust something that's not initially accounted for]. I hope my judgement is correct here and you'll be able to understand it.✌️
Crazy this is free
11:25: Wouldn't the effective tax-rate shown on the income-statement be pertinent to the company's taxable-income rather than to its operating income? That is, if taxable-income is markedly lower than operating-income because of the deduction of interest-expense, then the rate listed on the income-statement might be an exaggeration for the purpose of free-cash-flow-to-firm (F.C.F.F.) computation, no?
Thanks a lot for your as always great teaching. Btw, you've entered Microsoft's Aquisitions number incorrectly in your FCFE calculations: 8099 instead of 8909.
Thank you for pointing this out, I checked multiple times my calculation. Now I see this is the error, that's why it's not matching with the professor.
@@sureshyaso Many Thanks! I came to the same conclusion. A transpose error. Incidentally, do you know how he came up with the $19, 370 reinvestment number?
@@richardgordon yes here is the break-up of reinvestment numbers:
Depreciation & Amort = 11686
+Non-recognised losses (gains) = -1249
-Changes in WC = 1086
-Capex = 20622
-Cash Acquisition = 8099
Net Re-investment = -19370.
Hope you got it! all the best
@@sureshyaso Thank you very much! Very much appreciated! Best, Richard Gordon
how to apply FCFE formula to Indian listed companies? can you elaborate with some indian company that uses Ind AS accounting standard?
🤯 10/10
Thank you very much for this presentation and slides! I find it very useful.
How did you come to Operating income of $ 69,916?
Look for operating income line item in the Income Statement; after gross and operating expenses are deducted from the revenue you get the operating income.
so my Cashflow from Operations - CapEx = FCF ist not the best way? ;)
How the cash acqquisitions are computed in $8099 in the calculation of MS FFCE ?
Can someone help ? thanks in advance
I heard Tesla is growing their FCF, but the media says otherwise.
🍀
Is unlevered free cash flow another name for free cash flow --> equity?
Levered means after debt, i.e. what is leftover to distribute to equity investors. Thus levered is FCFE, and unlevered is FCFF.
@@stefankrgovic2167 sorry the opposite then. Essentially means after you account for (subtract) the debt. For a common shareholder is FCFF a better metrics?
Explain to me how @16:00 cash retained (not distributed in dividend) is not retained earnings?
He's saying that if you are thinking retained earnings then you are going to wrong side of the balance sheet. Retained earnings is not the wrong answer
FCFs are the most important aspect when looking at fundamentals of the company.
FCFF is not the cash flow the firm generated if it was 100% equity financed. Because you’re ignoring the fact that operating income is inflated by the benefit of leverage.
""Like an impending execution" 😂😂
Huh? At 3:38 Free Cash Flow does not include working capital needs? Only debt servicing? And what in the world is "expected value added by future investments"? Aswath probably refers to his own portfolio. That slide cannot possibly represent a real business.
Can anyone please explain wc investment
Building up inventory to be able to timely satisfy future demand. That is a cash outflow because suppliers want to be paid. But you didn't sell yet, so no corresponding inflow.
Generally, when a company grows, it has higher wc needs.
I made my first million from growing my money through stock trading and I totally know nothing about trading, the grace I had was meeting a good broker from a big shark in the financial market, excited
Hey Aarushi, I'm an Indian in California, as a beginner I need urgent help to grow my idle money, please share your broker with me, I would appreciate it.
@@aaravsamardh7089 He is known as Monroe Horcel look him up on the webb
@@aarushisanah5811 Alright, I can see his profile here on the web, sent him a well articulated email hoping I get a response
Im happy Mr Monroe is getting the recognition he deserves, I was ones at his conference in Miami he spoke well
@@jasminemccumber4694 27k to 777k in 5 months considering the market instability is an impressive result, my uncle an Indian here in the U.S, is lucky working with Mr Monroe because he usually works with the big sharks in stock market
.
Thank you