How a Hobbyist Created An Infinite Pattern That Never Repeats

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
  • Has the Einstein Problem finally been solved? For decades, mathematicians, logicians and professional puzzlers have tried to find the existence of a single tile that by itself scales to infinity without ever repeating it's pattern. Was 2023 the year this illusive shape was found...
    Merch!
    I think Scientists are Rockstars so I made t-shirts to celebrate it
    Einstein Rockstar Tee: www.drbenmiles.com/merch/p/ro...
    Curie Rockstar Tee: www.drbenmiles.com/merch/p/ro...
    Schrodinger Rockstar Tee: www.drbenmiles.com/merch/p/ro...
    #maths #science #einstein #puzzle #breakthrough
    Chapters:
    0:00 Can A Single Shape Infinitely Tile?
    0:52 Regular Tessellating Polygons
    3:45 Introducing Irregular Shapes To The Problem
    4:23 Non-Periodic and Aperiodic Tiling
    5:56 Wang Tiles
    7:16 Penrose Tiles
    8:35 David Smith and the Aperiodic Monotile, The Hat
    10:45 The 'Impossible' Shape - The Spectre
    11:59 5 Fold Symmetry In The Real World. Dan Shechtman & Quasicrystals
    If you enjoy the channel and want even more physics, tech, and business content, I've just launched new Instagram and Threads pages. Follow on the links below
    Insta: / drbenmiles
    Threads: threads.net/drbenmiles
    Newsletter drbenmiles.substack.com/
    A few people have asked so I've added the info below. Some of these are affiliate links. If you make a purchase it doesn't cost you anything extra, but a percentage of the sale will help support this channel and my work to bringing entrepreneurship into science.
    My camera : amzn.to/3ed5Xac
    My lens: amzn.to/3xIAZyA
    My lav: amzn.to/2SeE20Y and amzn.to/3nK33wA
    My mic: amzn.to/3gUYYEv
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 236

  • @DrBenMiles
    @DrBenMiles  5 місяців тому +36

    Want a dino tile? 🦖 Drop me a comment below! I'll announce the winners at the end of next weeks video
    Errata:
    - A clip of a spinning heptagon from a cut scene made it in, in place of a spinning hexagon - I will be forever embarrassed of this mistake - sorry.

  • @Chaisz3r0
    @Chaisz3r0 5 місяців тому +86

    2:02 Ah yes, the famous six-sided pentagon ;)
    3:08 and the famous seven-sided hexagon, too.

  • @smartereveryday
    @smartereveryday 4 місяці тому +76

    Fun video, thanks for making it.

  • @mrdarklight
    @mrdarklight 5 місяців тому +140

    Just wanted to point out, as a graphic artist and Civilization 6 fanatic, the shape you used when talking about a shape with six sides (at 3:10), in fact, had seven sides.

    • @jamestreydte9934
      @jamestreydte9934 5 місяців тому +21

      Was gonna comment this, glad somebody else noticed too😂

    • @DrBenMiles
      @DrBenMiles  5 місяців тому +44

      Ahhh, nightmare! Thanks for the catch

    • @Not_mera
      @Not_mera 4 місяці тому +14

      Same thing at 2:02, the Pentagon is a hexagon (at least the hexagon is a hexagon tho)

    • @boxcarz
      @boxcarz 17 днів тому

      @@DrBenMiles Don't be too sad; Leave a mistake like that in the video 'accidentally,' and more people (like me) get upset enough about it to leave a comment and boost your channel stats. ;)

  • @ArmyGuyClaude
    @ArmyGuyClaude 5 місяців тому +58

    I’m just glad, as a physics hobbyist, that a hobbyist was able to make waves

    • @scootndute579
      @scootndute579 5 місяців тому +6

      For real, the scientist gets a nobel prize for a semi repeating problem but a hobbyist figures it out and is called ... A hobbyist

    • @KaiHenningsen
      @KaiHenningsen 5 місяців тому +5

      @@scootndute579 Well, in astronomy, they're called "amateurs", and they're well known for occasionally figuring things out. Lots of astronomy stuff was first observed by amateurs. Maybe not so surprising when you consider that modern amateur telescopes are usually better than what Galileo used, plus there's photography now ... and how many objects are flying around even just in our own solar system.

  • @aDifferentJT
    @aDifferentJT 5 місяців тому +115

    You’re somewhat incorrect in your statement of the problem, there are lots of shapes that can tile aperiodically, the problem was to find a shape that can tile aperiodically but cannot tile periodically.

    • @brostein6
      @brostein6 4 місяці тому +6

      The definition given of aperiodic was no periodic. So, given base level reasoning any aperiodic shape will be not periodic. Any periodic shape will not be aperiodic. So, I'm not so sure you're correct in your statement at all.

    • @IPWCsInTheory
      @IPWCsInTheory 4 місяці тому +6

      At 0:48 he briefly shows an aperiodic tiling with a tile that CAN be tiled periodically.
      The previous comment is correct.

    • @aDifferentJT
      @aDifferentJT 4 місяці тому

      @@brostein6when was that definition given?

    • @brostein6
      @brostein6 4 місяці тому

      @aDifferentJT in the video. Also a base understanding of how prefixes work.

    • @brostein6
      @brostein6 4 місяці тому

      @IPWCsInTheory that would make the tiling periodic.

  • @CensoredByYouTube.
    @CensoredByYouTube. 4 місяці тому +44

    The sad story of Pauling's denigration of Shechtman and his work simply reinforces for me how supremely arrogant and cliquish the scientific community can be, and how easily one can be cast out of it, lose their funding, and the resulting ability to pay their mortgages, car installments, and their childrens' college tuition, if they don't tow the party line.

    • @badgerchillsky535
      @badgerchillsky535 4 місяці тому +8

      There’s a quote, don’t remember the exact quote or who it’s contributed to, but it says that half of what we know about science is wrong, we just don’t know which half.
      I have a hard time taking anyone seriously who says “that’s not possible”. History is filled with examples of how humanity was certain about how the world and universe works, but later we found out it was flawed, or even completely wrong.

    • @CensoredByYouTube.
      @CensoredByYouTube. 4 місяці тому +15

      @@badgerchillsky535 Along those lines, speaking of quotes, one of my favorites is _"The moment a scientist declares 'the science is settled,' he ceases to be a scientist, and becomes an evangelist."_

    • @Jackpkmn
      @Jackpkmn 3 місяці тому +1

      @@badgerchillsky535 The worst offender to me is by far medical science. Medical science study is overwhelmingly done exclusively on white men and then its just assumed that any findings can be translated and adjusted for women and people of other races.

    • @escthedark3709
      @escthedark3709 3 місяці тому +1

      You mean race isn't skin deep and that biological sex isn't irrelevant? Sounds like someone needs more diversity and inclusion reeducation.

    • @kiddhkane
      @kiddhkane 3 місяці тому

      Thats because white men are the ones who end up paying for 99% if meds.

  • @Autoskip
    @Autoskip 5 місяців тому +7

    Dinos please!
    …though if you'd asked me what my favourite aperiodic tiling was, before the Hat discovery, it was Penrose's kites and darts, then the Hats and Spectres took pole positions when they were discovered, and then, a couple of weeks ago, I found out about the Trilobite and Crab tiling, and I quickly fell in love with its simplicity in construction, and how close it dances with looking like it should tile the plane.

  • @simpsonyellow
    @simpsonyellow 5 місяців тому +8

    Shout out to the heptagon stepping in as the hexagon's understudy at 3:07. Pulled off a convincing performance!

    • @DrBenMiles
      @DrBenMiles  5 місяців тому +3

      😅 I'm crushingly embarrassed that slipped through

    • @joe-skeen
      @joe-skeen 3 місяці тому +1

      My four year old identified a shape (incorrectly) as a heptagon the other day. I was just shocked he knew that word.

  • @cowgirljane3316
    @cowgirljane3316 5 місяців тому +19

    As a dyslexic, math has always been a massive struggle, and I had no idea what you were saying, but I am still fascinated by math and especially quantum physics. As an artist, I see shapes in everything, and that dinosaur is cool. Who says they went extinct, they are in math.

    • @KaiHenningsen
      @KaiHenningsen 5 місяців тому +2

      Many species of dinosaurs went extinct, but there are still dinosaurs around. We call them "birds". You might say that they have ... _changed shape._

    • @troywhite6039
      @troywhite6039 4 місяці тому

      They are also called lizards, gators, komodo dragons, etc. They just got smaller.

    • @margretrosenberg420
      @margretrosenberg420 4 місяці тому +2

      ​@@troywhite6039Nope. Lizards etc. share a common ancestor with dinosaurs, but they're basically "cousins" of dinosaurs, not descendants. Birds, on the other hand, are direct descendants of the dinosaurs.

    • @flameofthephoenix8395
      @flameofthephoenix8395 4 місяці тому +2

      @@margretrosenberg420 Yeah, and that's a scary thought, you can't even use the "Just need to run faster than the slowest of us" trick since those darn birds just peck everywhere randomly.

  • @larryscott3982
    @larryscott3982 5 місяців тому +5

    3:09 describing rotating a hexagon. But is that a 7 sided tile?

  • @rosiefay7283
    @rosiefay7283 11 днів тому

    9:44 It absolutely counts as one. We are tiling the plane --- the ordinary, familiar Euclidean plane. Reflections, just like translations and rotations, are isometries of the plane. So tiles that are reflections of each other are congruent, and so are instances of the same tile shape.

  • @DonaldDucksRevenge
    @DonaldDucksRevenge 4 місяці тому

    I love both these stories! thank you for bringing them to us!

  • @cheeky1664
    @cheeky1664 5 місяців тому +2

    Excellent, as ever! 😊😊
    Thank you! 😊😊

  • @support2587
    @support2587 4 місяці тому

    The deserved a subscribe! All I could think of was how to incorporated this in a remodel.

  • @PaulPassarelli
    @PaulPassarelli 4 місяці тому

    I first heard the term quasicrystal back in Feb '87 at a presentation at the Cornell Space Sciences building. I remember it well.

  • @En_theo
    @En_theo 5 місяців тому +15

    That example at the end, of a scientist to afraid to publish a proof because the "scientific" community can be so harsh with people with new ideas, that tells it all. It's the main problem in science, most of people just repeat what is deemed "true" before them and are ready to stone anyone with a new idea. Just ask John Bell ...

    • @thenonexistinghero
      @thenonexistinghero 4 місяці тому +2

      That's not the main problem in science. The main problem is modern science is just how damn corrupted it is. Something like this should be criticised. A theory holding up even under scrutiny or even if it doesn't, it leading to new knowledge and insights... that's what science should be about. Sadly modern science is all about propaganda and indoctrination for large part. Doing research often requires funding and governments and major companies won't fund if they think the results work against them or if they don't deem something important enough.

    • @En_theo
      @En_theo 3 місяці тому

      @@thenonexistinghero
      True, corruption is the other big problem. But even without corruption, prejudices would block any progress if it was not for some motivated genius.
      But problems in Physics are more and more complicated and it requires the help of so many different fellows to prove your theory right, that it's impossible to get there if you have a "fantastic" hypothesis.

    • @colatf2
      @colatf2 3 місяці тому

      @@thenonexistinghero😂😂sure bud

    • @thenonexistinghero
      @thenonexistinghero 3 місяці тому

      @@colatf2 Good to know you're a mindless foo.

    • @boxcarz
      @boxcarz 17 днів тому

      @@colatf2 ???????

  • @Italianjedi7
    @Italianjedi7 5 місяців тому +7

    Wow. It amazes me how some humans are able to figure out things that would never arise from my brain. I’m literally a kitten playing with a string compared to the thinker statue eternally thinking

    • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
      @ChaoticNeutralMatt 4 місяці тому +2

      You underestimate yourself.

    • @margretrosenberg420
      @margretrosenberg420 4 місяці тому +1

      "Always remember that you are totally unique, just like everybody else." (Sorry, I know it's a quote, I just don't know who first said it.)
      We all excel at something; if we're very lucky we manage to figure out what before we waste our lives trying to be someone we aren't.

  • @gregduhon5510
    @gregduhon5510 5 місяців тому +5

    My brain crashed while listening to this video. Rebooting my brain now. I will keep watching this video until my brain stops rebooting. 👍

    • @abcde_fz
      @abcde_fz 3 місяці тому +1

      I love learning things that only 10% of my brain 'gets', hoping that the other 90% catches up eventually!!!

  • @ZoonCrypticon
    @ZoonCrypticon 5 місяців тому +2

    @7:55 Interesting, "...projection of a five dimensional space with fivefold symmetry onto a 2D plane..." . One should name Penrose- Tiles "Penta-Rose"-Tiles.

  • @GordieGii
    @GordieGii 5 місяців тому +6

    @3:07 you showed a heptagon while talking about a hexagon. Was that intentional?

    • @Robert_McGarry_Poems
      @Robert_McGarry_Poems 5 місяців тому

      He also called the hexagons heptagons earlier in the video... Maybe he just put the clips in the wrong spot... 🤔🧐

    • @DrBenMiles
      @DrBenMiles  5 місяців тому +2

      I think I stared at shapes moving across the screen for too many hours and became blind to them. Sorry all. Thanks for catching 😂

  • @guidodebacker4205
    @guidodebacker4205 4 місяці тому

    not my usual cup of tea, but fascinating and beautiful... thanks for explaining

  • @orvilleredenpiller338
    @orvilleredenpiller338 3 місяці тому

    My favorite drama is geometric drama.
    It always comes full circle.

  • @blucat4
    @blucat4 4 місяці тому

    This is new to me, very cool content. I'm amazed that such a complex piece can be tiled, forget about never repeating. Is the universe deliberately weird, or is my brain just too simple?

  • @charliec6020
    @charliec6020 5 місяців тому +2

    There's a box game from Germany called "Walong" full of multiple colours of the same curved piece that may have been overlooked as a solution the inventor went straight to market as a type of child's toy rather than seek academic review, but it can be combined with itself extensively (not sure about infinite)

    • @zorrothomas8641
      @zorrothomas8641 5 місяців тому

      Review it, you and him can study it together and get recognition

    • @margretrosenberg420
      @margretrosenberg420 4 місяці тому

      I just tried searching on "Walong game" and Google kept hitting on something called "Wo Long: Fallen Dynasty." Can you provide a link?

  • @radiantthought
    @radiantthought 5 місяців тому +1

    would you be able to share the stl for the dinosaur? I'd like to print some myself to play around with.

  • @BOBLAF88
    @BOBLAF88 4 місяці тому

    Perfect information down a road less traveled. I think E8 theory and other assemblages of ideas will eventually reveal something wonderful.😃

  • @andyspillum3588
    @andyspillum3588 5 місяців тому +3

    Oooh! oooh! "DINOS PLEASE" As a Very amateur "hobbyist"? (I, poorly, sculpt), I find the story super compelling (and a little bit an indictment of academia), and I've since the late '70's-early '80's been Awestruck by what that man (M.C. Escher) could do with a pencil

  • @antonymossop3135
    @antonymossop3135 5 місяців тому +2

    What a lovely story, it put a smile on my face.

  • @ytseberle
    @ytseberle 4 місяці тому

    "DINOS PLEASE"! (If you have any more!) It was good hearing more about the human background of this discovery.

  • @TomTom-rh5gk
    @TomTom-rh5gk 4 місяці тому

    I finally understand the problem. Dr Ben is a great explainer.

  • @rikschaaf
    @rikschaaf 4 місяці тому

    3:07 eh... Doctor, that ain't a hexagon. :D

  • @stumccabe
    @stumccabe 5 місяців тому +1

    Ben Miles - when you were rotating the shape (at about 3:10) you said it had 6-fold symmetry - but you were rotating a heptagon!

  • @luciddaze248
    @luciddaze248 5 місяців тому +1

    Dino please! Renovating here and this has given me ideas...

  • @user-fz3cw1ie3l
    @user-fz3cw1ie3l 5 місяців тому

    late to finding this fascinating article. if not "dinos please", then perhaps just the 'stl' so that I could have some samples made for my college class in "Geometry and the Art of Design". we explore tessellations and even Penrose law suit against Kleenex tissue company for copyright infringement -
    for using his tiling patterns on the quilted sheets. Hope we do not see a "repeat" with these monotiles!!

  • @christopherd.winnan8701
    @christopherd.winnan8701 5 місяців тому

    Is there an existing library of periodic shapes and how they have been escherized?
    How can I find new shapes for this process?

    • @maryjones5710
      @maryjones5710 4 місяці тому

      Ever heard of Google, one of many search engines you can ask anything.

  • @VisibletoanyoneonYoutubes
    @VisibletoanyoneonYoutubes 3 місяці тому

    Everything when on psychedelics
    Patterns envelop every surface.
    Not just any patterns, but symmetrical -geometrical patterns.
    The human brain is wonderful

  • @rosiefay7283
    @rosiefay7283 11 днів тому

    7:01 The aperiodic sets of two tiles are not Wang tiles.

  • @FoxDog1080
    @FoxDog1080 3 місяці тому

    3:07
    _Accidentally picks up the wrong one_

  • @kaicheung5916
    @kaicheung5916 5 місяців тому +1

    Dinos please! I have always loved this problem, and the solution is so incredible.

  • @rosiefay7283
    @rosiefay7283 11 днів тому

    5:26 I don't understand. There are aperiodic tilings containing large sections that appear elsewhere --- indeed, where *any* section, no matter how large, appears in infinitely many places in the tiling.

  • @Junkpusher77
    @Junkpusher77 5 місяців тому +2

    My desire for a Dino has crystallized sixfold

  • @slammish.
    @slammish. 5 місяців тому +1

    Pauling's response was sad. Good lesson in appeals to authority I guess. Love to give my nephews some dino-spectres.

  • @artstsym
    @artstsym 3 місяці тому

    Fascinating video, can't help but feel there's probably cryptographic implications to this as well, though I'm not well versed enough in either field to say what they might be.

  • @mattt2812
    @mattt2812 5 місяців тому +1

    Lol, spinning a heptagon to demonstrate 6-fold symmetry. I thought I was going nuts.

    • @DrBenMiles
      @DrBenMiles  5 місяців тому +2

      My bad. Late night editing brain let that slip through

  • @saultube44
    @saultube44 5 місяців тому

    Spectrum might had reached a Fractal Shape, since Fractals are not repeating, it should follow the tendency.
    But nobody checks, ironically, withe the Einstein explanation of Relativity example: 1 observer standing still and another on a moving train, turns on the light, and the observer calculates the time it takes the Light to traveler man when the Light hits to the man standing; there's a gap; is this gap Fractal? Would it contribute to such Fractal and non-repeqting pattern shape? Would it mean the University and everything in it, have such feature?

  • @marikasdaughter6263
    @marikasdaughter6263 4 місяці тому

    Most of the "non repeating" patterns look like they repeat infinitely to me... At least this new shape doesn't automatically appear to repeat at all like the rest do.

  • @daskritterhaus5491
    @daskritterhaus5491 4 місяці тому +5

    my admiration for mr 2 nobels just fell 4 notches.

  • @alexanderstohr4198
    @alexanderstohr4198 4 місяці тому

    03:07 - this shape has 7 edges and 7 corners. - dont call it a hexagon. ;-)

  • @jimjackson4256
    @jimjackson4256 5 місяців тому +1

    So how about 3 dimensional non repeating shapes?

  • @Side85Winder
    @Side85Winder 4 місяці тому

    Daniel Shechtman: I am a sole winner of a nobel prize too, cop that Linus Pauling!

  • @WilliamWizer
    @WilliamWizer 4 місяці тому

    it's easy to find a image of how to draw the einstein but I have found myself unable to find how the spectre is made. it's just curiosity but, can somebody point me to a simple source that shows how to draw those curves?

  • @torbjornalmli
    @torbjornalmli 5 місяців тому +1

    @ 2:02
    2 hexagons?
    I know they are the bestagons but still...

  • @badgerchillsky535
    @badgerchillsky535 4 місяці тому

    Dinos please! I imagine they’re all taken, but is there an STL file?

  • @z4zuse
    @z4zuse 5 місяців тому

    3:08 heptagon masquerading as hexagon

  • @markandrews7701
    @markandrews7701 4 місяці тому

    I would be interested in learning how you prove that such a shape can tile a plane to infinity without repeating.

  • @muhdkamilmohdbaki7054
    @muhdkamilmohdbaki7054 4 місяці тому

    Not sure what is the application of this but I guess the Spectre shape can be made into cookies with least waste as opposed to circle shaped cookies (the most common). However, humans have been making square shaped cookies for a very long time and it won't produce any waste.

  • @waynesworldofsci-tech
    @waynesworldofsci-tech 5 місяців тому

    Darn, and here I thought it was a Spirograph video!

  • @ESw0rdsman
    @ESw0rdsman 4 місяці тому

    The sound that precedes Scientific Discovery isn’t “Eureka”, but “Huh, that’s interesting”

  • @isbestlizard
    @isbestlizard 4 місяці тому

    How easy is it to make custom porcelain tiles? These would be amazing for my bathroom o.o

  • @pixelanthony
    @pixelanthony 4 місяці тому

    2:00 That's a hexagon, not a pentagon.

  • @Ogolero
    @Ogolero 3 місяці тому

    “DINOS PLEASE”

  • @stischer47
    @stischer47 4 місяці тому +2

    Ah yes, when "experts" declare that something is impossible. I would have thought that in the 21st Century we would have gotten past that, but apparently not "Mr. 2 Nobel Prize Winner". The internet is one of the reasons that non-scientists are able to provide scientific breakthroughs, if the "experts" are willing to listen.

    • @holorain8410
      @holorain8410 3 місяці тому

      This is the kind of logic flat earthers use to justify their beliefs

    • @jongrover8763
      @jongrover8763 3 місяці тому

      I just got told that one of my ideas is impossible within the last week. Maybe I should publish.

    • @rosiefay7283
      @rosiefay7283 11 днів тому

      Citation, please, of an expert declaring that an einstein is impossible. Mathematicians haven't said this --- rather, before Dave Smith's discovery, they said that the smallest number of tiles in any *known* aperiodic tile set is 2, and no einstein is *known*. Experts distinguish between what is true and what is known to be true. They are more modest about the state of human knowledge than you acknowledge.

  • @Kobai36
    @Kobai36 3 місяці тому

    2:00 those are both hexagons

  • @otteroid2
    @otteroid2 5 місяців тому +1

    dino tile please!

  • @brianegendorf2023
    @brianegendorf2023 4 місяці тому

    I read a book about this..its fascinating stuff. They went all the way to the coldest parts of Russia to get the meteorite to prove that these patterns can happen in nature.

  • @abxyabxy281
    @abxyabxy281 3 місяці тому

    I'm letting that hat shape be reflected, because I can barely tell the difference anyways.

    • @rosiefay7283
      @rosiefay7283 11 днів тому

      Reflections are always allowed in tilings in the plane.

  • @troywhite6039
    @troywhite6039 4 місяці тому

    Dinos please
    This reminded me of the envy free cake cutting challenge, another mathematical algorithm If I could get the dimensions of the specter tile accurate, I think it would be cool to make a driveway or garden path from a cement tile mold.

  • @orsonzedd
    @orsonzedd 4 місяці тому

    I see you using that heptagon when you said hexagon

  • @dentstroyer
    @dentstroyer 3 місяці тому

    3:08 thats a heptagon

  • @inomo
    @inomo 4 місяці тому

    Why are you rotating an heptagon to demonstrate the hexagon 6-fold symmetry?

  • @inguszemene1098
    @inguszemene1098 4 місяці тому

    2:00 you did 2 hexagons

  • @imtootired1993
    @imtootired1993 3 місяці тому

    But isn't the textbook definition of the word pattern "a repeated decorative design"?

  • @uncleroach
    @uncleroach 5 місяців тому +1

    I wonder how many discoveries are beeing keept in drawers due to ego of supperiors or colleauges?

  • @margretrosenberg420
    @margretrosenberg420 4 місяці тому

    If I'm not too late, Dinos please.

  • @m3talHalide-rt2fz
    @m3talHalide-rt2fz 5 місяців тому

    price of a stock over time are the 2 dimensions we all use..

  • @KaiHenningsen
    @KaiHenningsen 5 місяців тому

    So ... should we have defined a circle as 12 degrees (or whatever other name)? That's the one that evenly divides into 3, 4, and 6. We're just lucky that 360 is 12*30.
    Weight of Pauling: he also was a vitamin C cook.
    Rock star scientist ... Brian Cox? Brian May? Some other Brian?

  • @LeeChesnalavage
    @LeeChesnalavage 5 місяців тому

    Dinos please. Don’t know what I’ll do with it though. Maybe try and fossilise it. 😅

  • @Freerangerification
    @Freerangerification 5 місяців тому

    "DINOS PLEASE"

  • @spiraldude
    @spiraldude 4 місяці тому

    Now do it in non-Euclidean space.

  • @appel-seed_
    @appel-seed_ Місяць тому +1

    Dinos please!

  • @tylermartin6620
    @tylermartin6620 5 місяців тому +1

    Great video! Dinos please!

  • @themexyeti
    @themexyeti 3 місяці тому

    3:07 wasn't a hexagon

  • @saultube44
    @saultube44 5 місяців тому

    There's a reason for the saying:
    "Science advances from funeral to funeral"; our limited minds, can only adapt so much, to the weirdness of the Universe 😊

  • @humanbeing-_-_-
    @humanbeing-_-_- 4 місяці тому

    Dinos please!
    If it’s not too late! Also, this is incredibly cool thank you for letting me learn something. Incredibly neat today.

  • @bkparque
    @bkparque 4 місяці тому

    A 2d representation of a 3d cube representing 2d logic and trinary logic

  • @jamesjenkins8882
    @jamesjenkins8882 4 місяці тому

    Anyone notice that he showed a 7 sided "hexagon"?...😅

  • @billyjhamlin
    @billyjhamlin 4 місяці тому

    Chirality makes different shapes in proteins, why not hats?

  • @soundmaster1966
    @soundmaster1966 4 місяці тому

    2:02 And where is the Pentagon? Your third figure shows 72 degree by definition? Wow. That is keen.

  • @TBButtSmoothy
    @TBButtSmoothy 4 місяці тому

    hexagon! *shows heptagon*

  • @CrunkNuts
    @CrunkNuts 5 місяців тому +1

    Dinos please! ❤

  • @mineman2142
    @mineman2142 4 місяці тому

    3:07 that's not a hexagon

  • @ebbinandflowin
    @ebbinandflowin 5 місяців тому

    Funny how you're talking about the hexagon at the 3:08 mark yet the geometric shape you're showing is the heptagon. On purpose to be sneaky or just a mere oversight?

  • @AllToDevNull
    @AllToDevNull 2 місяці тому

    It is very funny and sad, when you understand that we have a unified physics theory that predicted everything correctly for 20 years now and is ridiculed or just ignored by the masses of physicists.... Stoyan Sargs BSM-SG model has predicted most phenomena that modern physics is puzzled about

  • @Khashayarissi-ob4yj
    @Khashayarissi-ob4yj 5 місяців тому

    So excellent, so beautiful
    With regards

  • @modernghost0
    @modernghost0 3 місяці тому

    omg yes please to the dinos

  • @GetRidOfHandles
    @GetRidOfHandles 3 місяці тому

    Dinos please?
    cool video

  • @sinomirneja771
    @sinomirneja771 4 місяці тому

    My favorite 5 dimensional latus projected on two dimensions is you mom!
    DINOS PLEASE!

  • @UnexpectedBooks
    @UnexpectedBooks 5 місяців тому

    Dino please!

  • @TheLegend-wz7fl
    @TheLegend-wz7fl 3 місяці тому

    Finally, the anti-fractal.