He actually means, meaning is context-dependent. And context is the mutual intelligebility between individuals => unless there is a common social similar background knowledge, meaning cannot be conveyed.
Hello sir, would you mind telling about context in ELT ? Such as in this topic: teaching punctuation through text based context in 1st and 2nd form EFL classroom. Thank you
But, if you make context so dynamic with situational relativity and ever changing; and also, taking into account the history, the environment scopes.. It will require a very dynamic normalization considering all these perspectives in real-time for people to process. That can be very dangerous if interpreted wrongly in a given sense of time, human psychological state, human retention state, situational awareness discrepancies and knowledge base and foundations of an individual. I find that extremely dangerous if the words are spoken fast, words with rhetorical gestures, non-linearity of sequential statements to the flow of actions or behavior being stated or described. The fact of reality is that artificial statements can be convolutional if spoken in business or scientific terms but, the behaviour or procedural statements will never change for a given set of action, no matter how you change their context for different perspectives used essentially for information hiding while speaking or interpreting anything. That can give people a state of mental fantasy or illusion that can be vague and end up in an abstract sense very very badly. How do you solve this for everyone in one go on universal level when it comes to knowledge delivery??
CONTEXT AND SYNCRET The whole concourse of contextualization versus syncretism explored by Ajith Fernando in his book Gospel Conversations 2001, brought back to mind again the Pope’s pronouncements that all religions lead to the same GOD recently. While we want to contextualize those we target for evangelism, we don’t want to involve syncretism in the process. Contextualization makes us adopt our methodology to suit each person differently based on HOLY SPIRIT’s leading. Syncretism leads us to compromise, leaving out the most important essential foundation of the truth, at the risk of watering down the Gospel and misleading those we wish to proselytize. I know this is above most of our heads but the point is there is no compromise in the World of GOD, we don’t blindly, stubbornly, and arrogantly, pound the Bible, yet still it’s all or nothing.
It’s funny when they try to define it, it’s a bunch of word salad that never really leads to a definitive explanation. The English language, oh so pretentious. If you look up the definition there are countless ideas that make little sense. How could context mean so many different things, because it’s the English language that why.
He's my professor, I love you, Sir.
Where
@@chanezgue1100 in school
He actually means, meaning is context-dependent. And context is the mutual intelligebility between individuals => unless there is a common social similar background knowledge, meaning cannot be conveyed.
I don't understand what "context" is.....but he kept repeating context, context, context.......... how am I supposed to know the meaning of the word?
Oh my god- same!!
@@audreyx1275 me too.
Lols!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Me to
Project for Media in the Public Interest, I subscribed because your videos are super cool!
I still don't get it
Be contextually aware
Sir give me example of context
Good explanation, thank you! Gbu😇
Hello sir, would you mind telling about context in ELT ?
Such as in this topic: teaching punctuation through text based context in 1st and 2nd form EFL classroom.
Thank you
Is "context" is similar with "context clues"? Are they interchangeable?
2:13 did he burp
HHAHHAHAH
LOL
Prah-ahhh-produce😂😜
wow
BAHAHAHAHAHA This made my day
Knowing things and knowing to teach things are two different things. And this professor doesn't know to teach.
Exactly!
Correct
Context = the system, based on which we build meaning.
WTF is he talking about? All these big words don't fit in my small head. If you can't phrase it simply enough, you don't understand the topic.
Frame of reference could another term for it
Great!
Situation, Meaning, Text: not performer, but created by writing a book
The music is distracting me from the content of this video.
Oh I thought this was Jerry Springer
NICE ONE
I feel like if someone could understand ur video they wouldn't be looking up what context is in the first place. 🤔🤔🤔🤔
But, if you make context so dynamic with situational relativity and ever changing; and also, taking into account the history, the environment scopes.. It will require a very dynamic normalization considering all these perspectives in real-time for people to process. That can be very dangerous if interpreted wrongly in a given sense of time, human psychological state, human retention state, situational awareness discrepancies and knowledge base and foundations of an individual. I find that extremely dangerous if the words are spoken fast, words with rhetorical gestures, non-linearity of sequential statements to the flow of actions or behavior being stated or described. The fact of reality is that artificial statements can be convolutional if spoken in business or scientific terms but, the behaviour or procedural statements will never change for a given set of action, no matter how you change their context for different perspectives used essentially for information hiding while speaking or interpreting anything. That can give people a state of mental fantasy or illusion that can be vague and end up in an abstract sense very very badly. How do you solve this for everyone in one go on universal level when it comes to knowledge delivery??
CONTEXT AND SYNCRET
The whole concourse of contextualization versus syncretism explored by Ajith Fernando in his book Gospel Conversations 2001, brought back to mind again the Pope’s pronouncements that all religions lead to the same GOD recently. While we want to contextualize those we target for evangelism, we don’t want to involve syncretism in the process. Contextualization makes us adopt our methodology to suit each person differently based on HOLY SPIRIT’s leading. Syncretism leads us to compromise, leaving out the most important essential foundation of the truth, at the risk of watering down the Gospel and misleading those we wish to proselytize. I know this is above most of our heads but the point is there is no compromise in the World of GOD, we don’t blindly, stubbornly, and arrogantly, pound the Bible, yet still it’s all or nothing.
the video image is too poor, you need to fix it more
in english please
It’s funny when they try to define it, it’s a bunch of word salad that never really leads to a definitive explanation. The English language, oh so pretentious. If you look up the definition there are countless ideas that make little sense. How could context mean so many different things, because it’s the English language that why.
Why the need to babble on
stop procrastinating just give a good lucid explaination of context
jeez
a dollar for everytime he says context😂
Never answered his own question
Don’t get it. Waste of time