USS Washington - The Hero of Savo Island

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 лис 2023
  • The USS Washington might be the most famous US battleship that was not preserved after her service as a museum ship. Lovingly nicknamed the Rusty W by her crew, the Washington was the only fast battleship of the US Navy to ever sink an enemy battleship. Designated BB 56, she was the 2nd North Carolina class fast battleship to be built. She was commissioned just prior to US involvement in World War 2 and saw extensive action in the Pacific theater. Named in honor of the 42nd state, Washington earned 13 battle stars for her service and participated in almost every major naval campaign of the Pacific War.
    Washington’s keel was laid down on June 14th, 1938 at the Philadelphia Navy Yard and she was launched 2 years later in June 1940. Washington was commissioned into the fleet on May 21st, 1941. She helped guard Allied shipping lanes in the North Atlantic before making her way to the Pacific Theater, where she would provide a boost to the moral of the Navy and the folks at home with her defeat of the Japanese battleship Kirishima at the 2nd Naval Battle of Guadalcanal. She spent the rest of her time in the Pacific split between screening US carriers, shore bombardment and close fire support for the Marines during various amphibious assaults.
    At the conclusion of the war, she participate in Navy Day at the Philadelphia Naval Yard before being sent back to England to participate in Operation Magic Carpet. After this, she was decommissioned and placed in the Atlantic Reserve Fleet before being struck from the Naval Vessel Register in June 1960. She would be sold for scrapped and broken up the next year. A truly sad ending for a magnificent and legendary battleship.
    #unitedstatesnavy #pacificwar #worldwar2 #navalhistory #battleship #usnavy #history #ww2 #worldofwarships

КОМЕНТАРІ • 382

  • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
    @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 5 місяців тому +282

    I agree that the loss of USS Washington and USS Enterprise to the scrappers is heartbreaking and almost criminal.

    • @jackthedragon612
      @jackthedragon612 5 місяців тому +16

      Indeed. In my own fictional universe, both ships are preserved.

    • @ralphe5842
      @ralphe5842 5 місяців тому +7

      It’s very expensive to maintain even rather small ships

    • @jackthedragon612
      @jackthedragon612 5 місяців тому +7

      @@ralphe5842 Well, it's more for the prestige of the ship itself rather than for the money and the fact that, like Wisconsin and Missouri, they can be called to action again.

    • @boombot3029
      @boombot3029 5 місяців тому +6

      And the kitty hawk

    • @turdferguson4124
      @turdferguson4124 5 місяців тому +4

      Almost criminal? That’s a little much.

  • @robertf3479
    @robertf3479 5 місяців тому +135

    It should be noted that even though USS Washington was Admiral Lee's favorite Flagship she was not equipped with Flag Bridge facilities while South Dakota was. Lee kept his Flag Staff to an absolute minimum (usually with only 1 or 2 officers and with enlisted personnel drawn from Washington's crew as part of their regular duties.
    After hoisting his Flag in Washington he and Captain Davis drew on Lee's experience prior to promotion to Rear Admiral to sharpen Washington's marksmanship (Lee had a lifelong love of sport and competition shooting, winning numerous awards as part of the Navy Rifle and Pistol teams.) The Gunnery Department said "Challenge accepted" and brought USS Washington a reputation as a straight shooting ship with what seemed to be 16" Sniper Rifles. Those gun crews were also able to fire their guns as quickly as any other USN battleship.
    The Kirishima never stood a chance.
    For more on Admiral Lee's career I highly recommend the book "Battleship Commander."

    • @73Trident
      @73Trident 5 місяців тому +15

      Battleship Commander is a great read. I highly recommend it. Admiral Willis A. Lee my favorite USN Admiral. North Carolina class are my choice as the best looking BBs ever.

    • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
      @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 5 місяців тому +15

      Admiral Willis Augustus Lee was awarded 6 medals in the Olympics.. he also single handed eliminated 3 snipers at Vera Cruz.

    • @brentwalters8921
      @brentwalters8921 5 місяців тому +9

      Battleship at War is also a good read

    • @jonathanlong6987
      @jonathanlong6987 5 місяців тому +5

      Kirishima was a battle cruiser.

    • @bkjeong4302
      @bkjeong4302 5 місяців тому +9

      You’re forgetting one thing: Washington opened fire at point-blank range. Even if it hadn’t been Lee in command, it would have been impossible to miss.

  • @markveerman3732
    @markveerman3732 5 місяців тому +84

    While serving as a volunteer at the VA, I met USS Washington officier. Arriving in 1943, he did miss the Guadalcanal battle. He was Jr. Officer of the Deck when the Washington collided with the USS Indiana. Later during his time on the Washington, he was put in command of Turret 1. Admiral Lee was on board the Washington at this time, and was well liked by the crew of the USS Washington. I throughly enjoyed talking to this USS Washington officer. He is now 102 years old and still doing well.

    • @garycb8592
      @garycb8592 4 місяці тому +4

      Father-in-law was aboard USS Indiana when the collision happened. Medical Dept.

    • @johnmckee744
      @johnmckee744 Місяць тому

      God Love you old-timer 🙏🙏🙏 we all love you grampa

    • @jmnichols57
      @jmnichols57 2 дні тому

      Is the office you talked to still alive (I'm not sure how long ago you visited him). I would love to talk to him, somehow. I'm writing a book on the Washington, and most of the guys are gone already. I went to 4 of the reunions years ago. What VA facility did you visit, what was his name? Thanks for any information.

    • @tn_bluestem
      @tn_bluestem День тому

      My grandfather was a GM on turret 2. Probably knew him

  • @fredericdewitt1208
    @fredericdewitt1208 5 місяців тому +58

    That was my dad's ship. Boarded her in Philidelphia and was still on her at the end of the war. Was a gunners mate on #2 turret. He never talked about it except that the captain (Lee) put the ship's radio on the intercom during the Great Marianas Turkey shoot. He said they were listening to all the pilots in the air and it was crazy as they could see what was going on as well. I toured the North Carolina with him. I agree, scrapping her was criminal. She brought my dad home.

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  5 місяців тому +5

      Very cool, God bless him. Thank you for sharing

    • @chadmcdaniel1374
      @chadmcdaniel1374 4 місяці тому +1

      And in time that ship brought you home.

    • @boatingexplainedwithcapndr8359
      @boatingexplainedwithcapndr8359 2 місяці тому +1

      It’s too bad that so many WWII vets kept their experiences so close to the vest when they returned (including my uncle who served in Europe). Their stories are history and many are lost forever.

  • @raymondhill7636
    @raymondhill7636 5 місяців тому +33

    My uncle served as a Marine from the day Washington was commissioned. He stayed aboard her until he was mustered out at the end of the war

  • @coreyandnathanielchartier3749
    @coreyandnathanielchartier3749 5 місяців тому +17

    The Japanese were stunned by the loss of IJN Kirishima, especially that she was sank at night, where the Japanese usually ruled the battlefield. It was one of the greatest dramatic moments in US Navy history......USS Washington, almost unescorted, charging into the night, and delivering a hail of accurate salvos against a formidable and confident enemy, causing them to retreat, and sparing the jarheads and sailors another night of hellish shore-bombardment on Guadalcanal.

  • @corneliuscrewe8165
    @corneliuscrewe8165 5 місяців тому +4

    “Stand aside. I am coming through. This is Ching Lee.” What a stud.

  • @0giwan
    @0giwan 5 місяців тому +39

    My understanding is that in the first salvo, Washington hit Kirishima's superstructure and basically wiped out her bridge. Washington thought they overshot, corrected down, and then put two salvos that hit Kirishima below the waterline.
    Basically, Kirishima was done 60 seconds into Washington opening fire, but the Japanese just didn't realize it yet.

    • @fredrickmillstead2804
      @fredrickmillstead2804 5 місяців тому +5

      Marksmanship.

    • @harrymurphey2634
      @harrymurphey2634 4 місяці тому +2

      ... the Washington was the largest "sniper" weapon even made ...

    • @fredrickmillstead2804
      @fredrickmillstead2804 4 місяці тому +3

      I cannot imagine what it would have been like to be on the superstructure of Kirishima when 9 16" rounds impacted. That had to be pure hell on the water.

    • @harrymurphey2634
      @harrymurphey2634 4 місяці тому +8

      ... the analysis of the wreck on the sea bed is upwards of (22) 16" hits ... above and below the waterline ... maybe more ...

    • @metaknight115
      @metaknight115 4 місяці тому +2

      @@harrymurphey2634I think it ease only twenty 16-inch shells and seventeen 5-inch shells

  • @yakhooves
    @yakhooves 5 місяців тому +49

    The fact they saved North Carolina and scrapped Washington hurts to this day.
    ~Washingtonian

    • @ColKorn1965
      @ColKorn1965 5 місяців тому +3

      Yep

    • @pvccannon1966
      @pvccannon1966 5 місяців тому +15

      As NorthCarolinian, saving BB55 , the most decoreated battleship of WW2. And keeping her in tip top shape with paint, a coffer dam, and a restored original plane on her rear deck is a honor.

    • @jonathanlong6987
      @jonathanlong6987 5 місяців тому +21

      The people of NC raised the $s. WA didn’t.

    • @yakhooves
      @yakhooves 5 місяців тому

      As a Washingtonian that completely tracks...@@jonathanlong6987

    • @gruntforever7437
      @gruntforever7437 5 місяців тому +8

      @@jonathanlong6987 Yep. North Carolina, Alabama, Massachusetts all were saved but not the Washington. Total horse crap

  • @eskrima1
    @eskrima1 5 місяців тому +29

    My father was on the light cruiser USS Atlanta which was sunk on the 13th. He was wounded but after being taken ashore was still given a .50cal in a Fox hole on the beach. He had a clear view of the next battle. Remember him saying he could see the larger shells and the smaller ones passing them up in the dark. A front row to history.

    • @carolecarr5210
      @carolecarr5210 5 місяців тому +6

      Your father is one of my heroes, giving me my freedom. Bless. Him!

    • @eskrima1
      @eskrima1 5 місяців тому +4

      @@carolecarr5210 thank you. He was surely a hero to me for so many reasons.

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  5 місяців тому +5

      Wow simply amazing...to have to go through that brutal street brawl of a naval fight, get shot up by your own people, then become a foot soldier on one of the toughest battlefields in history. God bless him, without men like that we stood no chance. You can have all the weapons, vehicles and ships, but without men with the courage and bravery to get stuff done, you have nothing. Thank you for sharing

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 5 місяців тому

      @@TheValorVault yeah yeah yeah, blah blah blah, there are men of EVERY generation that would stand up if need be. To assume or say that this generation is "special" because of it is utterly false

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  5 місяців тому +3

      @jonnyblayze5149 I'm sorry but I said absolutely nothing about any specific generation being "special" in my comment above and neither did anybody else. Your absolutely right and I know a few dudes who are current active duty who would certainly be badasaes if stuff went down.

  • @allanboyer2769
    @allanboyer2769 4 місяці тому +18

    I'm from Washington, seeing the North Carolina is on my bucket list. Wish it could be the Washington, the greatest of all U.S. battleships. My humble thanks to all who served aboard her. True American heroes.

    • @dragineeztoo61
      @dragineeztoo61 4 місяці тому +2

      I highly recommend a tour of the North Carolina, then the Wisconsin or New Jersey. The #1 turret is open to tour and still has the optical range finder installed. It is VERY cramped quarters. Then go to an Iowa class where the range finder has been removed and you'll find the difference in the amount of free space remarkable.

    • @jamesmurray8558
      @jamesmurray8558 Місяць тому

      Where in Washington are you from? I was stationed in Sedro Woolley in the Park Service. Was at Mt. St. Helens.

    • @allanboyer2769
      @allanboyer2769 Місяць тому

      Vancouver. area, just north of Hazel Dell. I heard St. Helens when she cleared her throat, and watched one of the large ash eruptions from Ridgefield when I was bucking hay.@@jamesmurray8558

  • @mikejackson7425
    @mikejackson7425 5 місяців тому +18

    My Dad was on the Washington. I took him to many BB56 reunions in the 80s and 90s. The Washington after detailed reviewing of the logs as many ships had done after the war, she was awarded by congress 2 more battle stars giving her a highly decorated 15 battle stars. Find the out of circulation book “Battleship At War” by naval historian Ivan Musicant. Great book.
    May we never forget the sacrifice of the Greatest Generation.

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 5 місяців тому

      Greatest generation? BWAHHHHHH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! no, not even close.

    • @dougerrohmer
      @dougerrohmer 4 місяці тому +1

      @@jonnyblayze5149 And who's your greatest generation?

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 4 місяці тому

      @@dougerrohmer it would have to be the one before. They went through the War to end all Wars, killing milions,the biggest in history (untill WWII) then immediately after went through the Spanish influenza pandemic killing milions, then had to endure the great depression killing millions, then to top it off had to watch their children go off halfway around the world to fight in the biggest conflict in human history, killing millions........and through all that they persevered.

    • @dougerrohmer
      @dougerrohmer 4 місяці тому +1

      @@jonnyblayze5149 Well there's overlap with the Depression and all that, and actually serving in WW2 and Korea. But whatever.

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 4 місяці тому

      @@dougerrohmer no there isnt, save for a few months of the pandemic. do you not know history?
      WWI :1914-1918
      20 million deaths
      Pandemic: 1918-1920
      50 million deaths
      Great Depression:1929-1939
      10 million deaths (US alone)
      WWII: 1941-1945 (US entry)
      75 million deaths

  • @JBrandeis1
    @JBrandeis1 4 місяці тому +3

    The two N. Carolina-class battleships were magnificent-looking fighting vessels.

  • @michaelgallagher2663
    @michaelgallagher2663 5 місяців тому +18

    A Sad Ending To Such A Beautiful And Historic Ship.

  • @edwardstill8995
    @edwardstill8995 5 місяців тому +9

    My Grandfather was on Washington in the A turret. I still have tons of his pictures of the crew of the Washington and his previous ship the Arizona.

    • @c.j.cleveland7475
      @c.j.cleveland7475 3 місяці тому

      The Arizona? Damn! Your grandfather had one hell of a career! Serving on 2 of the most famous ships in the Navy and surviving the war. Much respect to your grandfather.

    • @timothyhill8392
      @timothyhill8392 3 місяці тому

      Any chance you would be willing to send some pics to me? My grandfather was on the Washington as well but I only have a few souvenirs, no pics.

  • @mikecimerian6913
    @mikecimerian6913 4 місяці тому +5

    Admiral Lee was a marksman with many championship medals at both rifle and pistol. The Washington gunnery crew were sniper accurate thanks to Adm Lee updating gunnery tables and having his crew train to be top gun.

  • @lloydknighten5071
    @lloydknighten5071 5 місяців тому +52

    It is sad that ships like U.S.S. WASHINGTON and H.M.S. VANGUARD were not preserved as memorials

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 5 місяців тому +4

      I would have preferred to have Saved the King George IV rather than the Vanguard

    • @BigAmp
      @BigAmp 5 місяців тому +1

      It would have been very challenging to preserve that one 😀 @@jamesricker3997

    • @bkjeong4302
      @bkjeong4302 5 місяців тому +4

      Vanguard did absolutely nothing and should never even have been built.

    • @Slaktrax
      @Slaktrax 5 місяців тому +7

      If any ship deserved saving, it was Warspite.

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 5 місяців тому

      @@Slaktrax there is no royal navy battleship that should have been saved.

  • @fighterace316
    @fighterace316 5 місяців тому +11

    What a beast!!! I love reading Washington’s night battle off Savo Island.

  • @russellmoore1046
    @russellmoore1046 5 місяців тому +18

    They didn't save Washington but did save the North Carolina. It's been about 30 years since i went and visited her but i have on occasion driven by her berth. She is awe inspiring even from a distance. I can only imagine what the sailors must have thought when these two and all of the South Dakotas started showing up in the Pacific. At last we got battlewagons to fight with! All the standards were to slow for fleet work with the carriers.

    • @rodneywilliams3532
      @rodneywilliams3532 5 місяців тому +3

      I worked with the living history crew on the USS North Carolina in the early 2000s was told many of the older living history crew members that the surviving members of the USS Washington would have reunions on the USS North Carolina because they are basically the same layout and Design. Also met many members and former crew members of the USS North Carolina during that time. Was truly an honor to do that at that time in my life.

  • @jameshuner9119
    @jameshuner9119 5 місяців тому +10

    She should be sitting in Bremerton….. unleashing her 16’s every 4th of July

    • @orcstr8d
      @orcstr8d 4 місяці тому

      Poor Bremerton deserves some sort of replacement after the Missouri was hijacked from them and placed in Pearl.

  • @graff324
    @graff324 5 місяців тому +6

    The USS Washington and Adm Lee brought the awesome 16" Panche to the two Japanese battleship. "Stand aside, I'm coming through !!!!

  • @petestorz172
    @petestorz172 5 місяців тому +19

    The 5"/38 was a mixed bag as an anti-ship gun. The lower muzzle velocity meant lesser range and armor penetration. OTOH, the gun's very high rate of fire meant that superstructure could be smothered, with high personnel casualties and destruction to fire control and communications. For AA, the combination of gun, turret train and elevation, fire control and the VT fuse were a class of its own.

    • @hazchemel
      @hazchemel 5 місяців тому +2

      Yes a great weapon and response to the evolving situation. Action reports give us accounts of the gun, and I think it was probably close to ideal for ranges under 20 000 yards, especially the HE.

    • @gruntforever7437
      @gruntforever7437 5 місяців тому +3

      @@hazchemel IT truly was the best DP gun in its class

    • @bluemarlin8138
      @bluemarlin8138 5 місяців тому +1

      In theory, it was limited as an anti-ship gun. In practice, it was just fine against destroyers, and it was unrealistic that a battleship would need to engage cruisers or battleships with its secondary battery anyway. Guadalcanal was really the only time a battleship/battlecruiser’s secondary battery damaged a battleship or cruiser, and it was just superficial damage to SoDak.

    • @jagtone
      @jagtone 2 місяці тому

      That's why they call it the secondary battery! Less important when you've got that 9x16" broadside.

    • @petestorz172
      @petestorz172 2 місяці тому +1

      @@jagtone , the 5"/38 was the main gun for destroyer classes after the Wickes and Clemson classes, and on Atlanta class light cruisers. On a battleship, different guns for different purposes. Those 14" or 16" guns were unsuited against aircraft (ask the Japanese about that), and poorly suited against craft such as PT boats or destroyers - against such threats 5"/38s were primary and pretty much sole. The big change in battleship secondaries was from a mixed battery of 5"/51 anti-ship and 5"/25 AA guns to a homogeneous battery of 5"/38s. 1930s-built fast battleships never had the mixed battery, but the rebuilt pre-Treaty battleships did have the change of battery in their rebuilds.

  • @marksavage8871
    @marksavage8871 5 місяців тому +19

    The Washington was not the last battleship to sink another battleship. That distinction goes to Oldendorf’s Pearl Harbor survivors during the battle of Surigao Straight.

    • @Ozai75
      @Ozai75 5 місяців тому +4

      And they smashed the hell out of that force too.

    • @milferdjones2573
      @milferdjones2573 5 місяців тому +3

      Note of the 8 BB at Pearl 6 were put back into action for that fight to get some revenge. This one was pure Karma.

    • @manilajohn0182
      @manilajohn0182 4 місяці тому +4

      That's actually not the case at all. All of the claims of main battery hits on Yamashiro were unconfirmed because Surigao Strait was a night action. U.S. after- action reports made claims for hits based on "pronounced Flare- ups" at the approximate time of arrival of fired salvos. While there may have been some hits, it's equally likely that Yamashiro was simply firing back and that the vast majority of U.S. shells were straddles.
      This is supported by the fact that the old U.S. battleships involved in the action all had shell dispersion rates as significant as those of the North Carolina's, South Dakotas, and Iowas- and most of them were actually greater. Lastly, the wrecks of both Fuso and Yamashiro have been discovered. Exploration of the wrecks has revealed that both vessels are essentially intact and that they were fatally damaged by torpedo attacks made by U.S. destroyers.

    • @marksavage8871
      @marksavage8871 2 місяці тому +1

      My dad was there - USS Claxton (DD-571) screening Oldendorf’s BB’s. He was topside and saw much of the battle.

    • @terryfowler6090
      @terryfowler6090 Місяць тому

      Washington was the only one to sink battleship one on one.

  • @hazchemel
    @hazchemel 5 місяців тому +8

    Thanks for that, and her modest lifespan included that remarkable drama at Guadalcanal; that action with South Dakota and Kirishima is the artist's version of a battleship in action.

  • @oceanhome2023
    @oceanhome2023 5 місяців тому +6

    The 5inch gun was the smallest size that new proximity fuse could fit on

  • @kcott4177
    @kcott4177 5 місяців тому +8

    I was privileged enough to be able to walk the decks of Enterprise in 1957 or 58 (its been a LONG time (laughing) when I was in the Cub Scouts. She was a BIG ship to a 7 or 8 yr old. She was scrapped not long after.

  • @shumyinghon
    @shumyinghon 5 місяців тому +12

    great, narrated with a tone of stirring conviction and purpose, that's how such stories should be told to the ears

  • @codyhilton1750
    @codyhilton1750 5 місяців тому +8

    An excellent video on this beautiful ship. It is a shame that this war hero was not preserved when the State had amble shore lines on the Pacific.

  • @S0ulinth3machin3
    @S0ulinth3machin3 5 місяців тому +7

    I would not want to be in a crew of a warship opposing one captained by Willis Lee. You're gonna get blown up.

  • @6mm250
    @6mm250 5 місяців тому +5

    This is a great informational video without any extraneous music , noise ,or drama

  • @dutchman7216
    @dutchman7216 5 місяців тому +3

    The navy should have saved USS Washington and USS Enterprise. The history they couldn't provide for generations to come would have been invaluable.

  • @jmrodas9
    @jmrodas9 4 місяці тому +3

    The ship was a good one, and proved its worth destroying the IJN Kirishima, in the only Battleship versus Battleship in the Pacific in World War II. However she had a couple of design problems, one that her radar had a large blind spot to the rear, and the other that she vibrated too much, when moving at high speed. But part of the credit must go to Admiral Lee and her crew, which made her perform so well.

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  4 місяці тому +1

      She was, and I covered everything you mentioned in the video

  • @raywhitehead730
    @raywhitehead730 Місяць тому

    The Bofor 40 mounts with radar direction and proximity fuses were the absolute Cadillac of anti air.

  • @jamesvandemark2086
    @jamesvandemark2086 4 місяці тому +1

    The Washington had Admiral Lee on board, That is one hell of an edge!

  • @glencrandall7051
    @glencrandall7051 5 місяців тому +6

    It's a shame that the reason gallant ships like the USS Washington fail to be saved purely because of financial reasons. I have been extremely fortunate to have been able to tour the USS North Carolina, The USS Alabama and the USS Iowa. I also made a brief visit to the USS Missouri when it was moored in Bremerton, WA. Although that sounds like a lot of museum ships there certainly should be more. The battleships were grand old ladies the likes of which will probably never be seen again. I am afraid the carriers will suffer the same fate. Many other classes already have.🙂🙂

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 5 місяців тому

      Probably? No, definitely. There will NEVER be battleships built/used again. Period

    • @jagtone
      @jagtone 2 місяці тому

      You say "purely because of financial reasons" as if that is some sort of triviality. Which it is, I guess, if you aren't the one who is paying.

  • @dawor1761
    @dawor1761 5 місяців тому +3

    Thank you very much for this documentary. I saw the New Jersey some years ago. Great ships and I'm thankful for the ones they preserved.

  • @johnmckee744
    @johnmckee744 Місяць тому +1

    Beautiful Ship excellent record should of been recommended a national Treasure

  • @73Trident
    @73Trident 5 місяців тому +10

    Great video and presentation. North Carolina class are my favorites. 28 Battle Stars between the two. I'm really enjoying your channel.

  • @graham2631
    @graham2631 5 місяців тому +7

    Great choice in pictures and interesting choice of details. Thumbs on this one.

  • @artsummers2095
    @artsummers2095 5 місяців тому +4

    I had an uncle Paul Summers a Franklin Kentucky, who served on the Washington throughout the war! He went to Scapa flow and stayed on her till the war ended. He had two brothers that used to tease him about never being in a fight and having a bed and hot chow. They never had a clue or bother to find out what he did. No one knew until I joined the Navy, and started to learn about the Washington. Now it was two sailors against two soldiers in our discussions.

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  5 місяців тому

      Wow, awesome stuff! I thank you and your uncle for your service to this nation!

  • @paulbegley1464
    @paulbegley1464 5 місяців тому +44

    How in the hell can they scrape a ship like her ?

    • @73Trident
      @73Trident 5 місяців тому +10

      Well they didn't come up with enough money is what I understand. Damn shame, only US BB to sink another capital ship outright.

    • @DK-gy7ll
      @DK-gy7ll 5 місяців тому +4

      The state of Washington should've found a way to do so. There were plenty of places around Puget Sound to moor her. Instead she was scrapped and all the state has for a museum ship now is the destroyer USS Turner Joy. While not a bad museum ship she pales in comparison to BB-56.

    • @poowg2657
      @poowg2657 5 місяців тому +6

      The same way they couldn't save the Enterprise.

    • @kylemartin2594
      @kylemartin2594 5 місяців тому +2

      Hey..they scrapped the Enterprise. Money

    • @jacksonlee3771
      @jacksonlee3771 5 місяців тому +5

      They needed the steel. China is desecrating old WW 2 ships to get the steel in 2023.

  • @92naz32
    @92naz32 Місяць тому +1

    Absolutely ludicrous that Washington was not at least preserved as a museum ship based on the battle of Savo Island alone, never mind the rest of her extensive combat actions throughout the war and her ties to Adm. Willis "Ching" Lee. A sad ending for one of the most legendary battle ships in US Naval history.

  • @m33p0
    @m33p0 5 місяців тому +15

    Washington didn't escape completely unharmed in that battle. one of her radar set got pierced possibly by kirishima. i think it was the very one the bureau of ordinance insisted to be installed where it was. poetic justice, i say.

    • @Zephyrmec
      @Zephyrmec 5 місяців тому +2

      My Dad served aboard Washington, the damage was a 5” hole in the CXAM reflector screen, it still worked.

    • @stanstenson8168
      @stanstenson8168 5 місяців тому

      Ordnance.

    • @Zephyrmec
      @Zephyrmec 5 місяців тому +1

      @@stanstenson8168 correct, predictive spelling got me! Apologies to the grammar monitor

    • @stanstenson8168
      @stanstenson8168 5 місяців тому

      @@Zephyrmec Wasn't talking to you.

    • @jonnyblayze5149
      @jonnyblayze5149 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Zephyrmec corrective spelling doesnt spell the word incorrect just man up and say you misspelled it.

  • @69Applekrate
    @69Applekrate 5 місяців тому +6

    Nicely done, informative and interesting. One of my favorite BBs. thank you

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  5 місяців тому

      Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for watching

    • @ejt3708
      @ejt3708 4 місяці тому

      @@TheValorVaultWas there a mention of Savo Island, or is this just clickbait?

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  4 місяці тому

      @ejt3708 I review Washington's actions during the 2nd naval battle of Guadalcanal, which occurred to the west of Savo Island and is also referred to as the 4th Battle of Savo Island. I don't get how you can claim that's clickbait when I discuss what was arguably Washington's finest hour which occurred in the waters off Savo.

    • @ejt3708
      @ejt3708 4 місяці тому

      @@TheValorVault I don't know how you don't know how. Even Wikipedia claims there is one Battle of Savo Island generally understood. If this is the Hero of the 4th Battle of Savo Island, which is not nearly as famous, then describe it as such honestly. This is total word-mincing clickbait.
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Savo_Island

  • @PostalWorker14
    @PostalWorker14 5 місяців тому +5

    My uncle was on destroyer in WW2 the big ships get all the attention but the destroyers do the dirty work

    • @paulprovenzano3755
      @paulprovenzano3755 5 місяців тому

      Destroyers saved my dad’s life in the battle off Samar.
      He was regular army …… Sixth Infantry ….. and he had no patience for the “glory boys“ on battleships and aircraft carriers. Conversely, he had nothing but respect for the ‘tin-can sailors’ of what he called ‘the REAL navy.

  • @Trojan0304
    @Trojan0304 5 місяців тому +2

    Kudos to best review of USS Washington on UA-cam, subscribed to channel 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @timandellenmoran1213
    @timandellenmoran1213 5 місяців тому +1

    Just a great ship all the way around!!

  • @valianttmt8044
    @valianttmt8044 4 місяці тому +1

    At least her sister ship, North Carolina, is still with us 🇺🇸❤️

  • @raya.pawley3563
    @raya.pawley3563 5 місяців тому +1

    Thank you

  • @seanbryan4833
    @seanbryan4833 5 місяців тому +1

    Last Friday I visited the North Carolina, Washington's sister ship. It was fascinating!

  • @montenewman6500
    @montenewman6500 5 місяців тому +3

    Excellent! Keep up the good work.

  • @tedrussell902
    @tedrussell902 5 місяців тому +9

    I had a friend that was on her .....Ronnie Young.

  • @christiansmith7544
    @christiansmith7544 3 місяці тому +1

    The USS WASHINGTON shouldn't have been scrapped with the history she had. An addition she was a battleship with 16in armament witch was the biggest the U.S had at the time under the treatys guidelines we had to follow. She should have been saved as a museum ship.

  • @adamstrange7884
    @adamstrange7884 5 місяців тому +10

    Admiral Ching Lee was to Naval gunnery what Spok was to Star Trek!

  • @timandellenmoran1213
    @timandellenmoran1213 23 дні тому

    Just the best ship in ww2 that the USA had, Uss Washington BB-56!!!

  • @bryanfields5563
    @bryanfields5563 5 місяців тому +1

    "Lost an Admiral" - WOW!

  • @Bill23799
    @Bill23799 5 місяців тому

    What a gallant ship she was. Thank you.
    Liked.....Subbed......Rang of the Bell

  • @raywhitehead730
    @raywhitehead730 Місяць тому +1

    It was Radar! As promoted by Admiral Lee, who was well trained himself in radar, at a time when many weren't , that was the deciding factor in the Kirishima battle. It happened at night, about midnight at short range (6,000 yards) and neither side had a visual when it started.

  • @user-ip8wu1ph2c
    @user-ip8wu1ph2c 5 місяців тому +4

    My dad was on thè washington. Iv heard lots of stories about her. He was on her from 39 to 45

  • @davidkimmel4216
    @davidkimmel4216 4 місяці тому +1

    Thank. So So Sad 😢

  • @danielwielki3490
    @danielwielki3490 4 місяці тому

    thx for resumen👍

  • @paulkronenberg-me7sl
    @paulkronenberg-me7sl 23 дні тому

    Informational and intruiging!

  • @oceanhome2023
    @oceanhome2023 5 місяців тому +2

    This gives a whole new meaning for the term SCREWED !!!

  • @robinrobinson4457
    @robinrobinson4457 2 місяці тому +1

    Awesome video brother stay strong and God bless ❤❤❤❤😅

  • @raywhitehead730
    @raywhitehead730 3 місяці тому +1

    Radar! And Admiral Lee.

  • @JerrySeriatos
    @JerrySeriatos 5 місяців тому +2

    Damned the Washington and London Naval Treaties!!

  • @carlmontney7916
    @carlmontney7916 4 місяці тому

    The lack of foresight in not saving this great warship is absolutely tragic. If ever there was a naval ship that deserved to be preserved for future generations to visit the Washington is it.

  • @michaelwallace7972
    @michaelwallace7972 2 місяці тому

    A great ship

  • @NickolasFigler-fi3wj
    @NickolasFigler-fi3wj 4 місяці тому

    I agree

  • @williampaz2092
    @williampaz2092 5 місяців тому +2

    Th British had learned during the early days of WW2 that aircraft carriers were horribly vulnerable when operating without battleships as escorts. Once the carrier’s air wing has been launched there is nothing to protect the carrier from a surface action group. A carrier has a very long punch, but a fragile “glass jaw.” One hole in the flight deck and there is nowhere for its aircraft to land. Only a battleship can take the pounding of a heavy action and keep fighting. Therefore they learned to deploy a Carrier - Battleship Task Force.

    • @GeorgiaBoy1961
      @GeorgiaBoy1961 5 місяців тому

      Expensive lesson to learn with the loss of the HMS Glorious, sunk by Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, 8 June 1940.

  • @mrman4003
    @mrman4003 4 місяці тому +1

    Interesting about the vibration problem, I wonder if any other class of fast battleships suffered this , the Iowas were almost double the power of the north Carolinas

  • @wesleyjarboe9571
    @wesleyjarboe9571 4 місяці тому +2

    Halsey blundered badly by taking TF34 with him on his northward wild-goose-chase.

    • @philliptukia8307
      @philliptukia8307 2 місяці тому +1

      That would have been a grand fight had Lee and his battleships been allowed to remain at San Bernardino Strait.

  • @coreydarr8464
    @coreydarr8464 5 місяців тому +4

    Imagine! The navy did not listen to senior NCO'S, thus The navy Put other navy ships in danger as well as the original ship!

  • @charhkfister
    @charhkfister 4 місяці тому +1

    the north carolina put up an up
    a crazy amount of AA in one naval battle another ship thought the north Carolina was on fire. it was just her AA batteries

  • @stevenm3823
    @stevenm3823 5 місяців тому +3

    Really wish that a WWII Navy "band of brothers" type mini series could be made by HBO...the story of the USS Washington and it's duel with the Japanese battleship Kirishima would make an awesome episode.

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  5 місяців тому

      great idea!

    • @Saxxonknight
      @Saxxonknight 5 місяців тому +3

      In all honesty without supporting ships Washington vs Kirishima is a one sided fight. Washington had bigger guns, more of them and better fire control coupled with better armor (Kirishima was really a battle cruiser not a battleship). Aside from problems like South Dakota had losing power, the direct matching up of either US BB vs Kirishima is lopsided.

    • @billsmith5076
      @billsmith5076 5 місяців тому

      Then the Kirishima should have stayed in Tokoyo@@Saxxonknight

    • @GeorgiaBoy1961
      @GeorgiaBoy1961 5 місяців тому +1

      @stevenm3823 - That's a great idea! Well-done! Many people do not know it, but the U.S. Navy, of all of the branches of service of the U.S. in the Solomon Islands campaigns, suffered the highest number of casualties. The Marines and their sacrifices are well-remembered, for obvious reasons, and the army, too, thanks to the terrible hardships those men suffered fighting in the jungles and highlands of Guadalcanal and other islands... but the navy men sustained the worst casualties. A superb history of those battles is "Neptune's Inferno" by the late James Hornfischer. An absolutely stellar and superb work, in my view.... read like an adventure novel, but it was fact.

    • @williamfreeman9356
      @williamfreeman9356 3 місяці тому

      Any navy film would be great any ship even a supply ship so much can happen on a ship from drowning to sharks to fire 🔥 on ship and floating to bombs and bullets.

  • @tonybuckley950
    @tonybuckley950 5 місяців тому +2

    Still the US did preserve significant fast battleships and the Texas.

  • @Aelxi
    @Aelxi 5 місяців тому +6

    Ching Lee's sniper rifle

  • @jerrykruth2142
    @jerrykruth2142 5 місяців тому

    Well done. A little more detail might have been used in Washington's duel with Kirishima.

    • @bluemarlin8138
      @bluemarlin8138 5 місяців тому

      Drachinifel and the Unauthorized History of the Pacific War channel both have very good and detailed videos on it.

  • @stephenhicks9530
    @stephenhicks9530 4 місяці тому

    What a sad ending for a heroic ship.

  • @jpmerrick8886
    @jpmerrick8886 5 місяців тому

    Yhe NC was great

  • @billboth4814
    @billboth4814 5 місяців тому +2

    Battle of Savo Island might have gone differently if Washington HAD been there.

  • @Chris-um3se
    @Chris-um3se 5 місяців тому +4

    Admiral Lee is hero.

  • @AdamosDad
    @AdamosDad 5 місяців тому +1

    "Fair Winds and Following Seas" Brothers 🇺🇸⚓
    🐉Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club Member 1968-69🐉🇺🇸⚓

  • @nosaltadded2530
    @nosaltadded2530 5 місяців тому +3

    "Not preserved after her service as a museum ship." That made no sense....at all.

  • @michaela4ru44hmofxbgnjhjmo2
    @michaela4ru44hmofxbgnjhjmo2 5 місяців тому +1

    Sorry I missed her😢😢.

  • @happyhighway106
    @happyhighway106 4 місяці тому

    #281 I enjoyed the history of this Battleship! She and her Crew helped to shorten World War II. The Kirishima rest on the bottom in 3,000 feet, up-side-down. Found By Dr. Comander Robert Ballard. Ther USS Gerald R. Ford class of Warships are the modern weapons of war. Machining a 16 inch gun takes about two years. And is very expensive! Lets give a big Toast to the Officers and Ratings of USS Washington.

  • @briancoates3955
    @briancoates3955 5 місяців тому +3

    I live in Washington born and raised so the Washington ment something to me.

    • @TheValorVault
      @TheValorVault  5 місяців тому

      I feel exactly the same about North Carolina.

    • @user-ip8wu1ph2c
      @user-ip8wu1ph2c 5 місяців тому +2

      My dad was on the Washington from1939 till the end of the war

  • @jonathanlong6987
    @jonathanlong6987 5 місяців тому +5

    Kirishima was a battle cruiser. Not a battleship. Less than 10 inches armor on her main belt & WWl style not slanted.

    • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
      @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 5 місяців тому +2

      Only the Brit battlecruisers blew up easily.

    • @jonathanlong6987
      @jonathanlong6987 5 місяців тому

      @@Future-Preps35 I have only read of 12.1” of armor sloped to repel 14” shells. Interesting.

    • @jonathanlong6987
      @jonathanlong6987 5 місяців тому

      @@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 At Jutland they filled their turrets with powder and shells for more rapid fire. Plus accurate German gunfire made for massive explosions. Turrets first. Magazines second.

    • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
      @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 5 місяців тому

      @@jonathanlong6987 And at the Denmark Strait 25 years later?

    • @manilajohn0182
      @manilajohn0182 5 місяців тому +2

      @@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 Captain Leach and Commander Lawson of Prince of Wales, and Ted Briggs of Hood are on record as stating that the boat deck fire sunk Hood through penetration of the ship's ventilation system of flash which reached a magazine.

  • @georgedoolittle9015
    @georgedoolittle9015 5 місяців тому

    People love to talk about how poorly the US Army and a Marine Corps unit did against the Japanese defending the Philippines but many people forget the "Battles of Iron Bottom Sound" which devastated the Royal Navy and very nearly sunk much of the extant US Naval Fleet at that time. The "Grey Ghost" (Enterprise) was sunk many times by the IJN according to their reports and so confidence was quite high quite often during Japanese Naval engagements early on as they did not expect much opposition. Washington definitely changed that perception right quick and lead to a devastating defeat upon what Japan called "The Island of Death"(Guadalcanal) the first of many for Japan. Hard to imagine Fleets growing to the size they did as played out starting in 1944 and the Battle of the Phillipine Sea then later the Battle of Leyte Gulf the biggest Naval Battle by far in Human History. The US Navy plus Australian Navy then had a horrific experience fending off kamikaze attacks during the support of the actual retaking of the Phillipines most terrifyingly at the Battle of Luzon where kamikaze tactics proved highly effective nearly killing General Douglas MacArthur who was on board i think the Augusta at the time. US Destroyer work during this time was a real knife fight along with PT Boat work as well. Once ashore the US Navy now controlled the most valuable strategic anchorage and Port in the entire Pacific Theater and now had US Army Air Force protection whenever needed which wasn't that much after the US Army with a think one battery of USMC Artillery and no Australians but definitely a lot of Filipinos absolutely annihilated the Japanese presence in the March towards Manila. The US Navy didn't have much to do after Manila was declared an open City so wound up off the Island of Iwo Jima where it is said the US Navy ordered the Marines into there "because they needed something to do" ahem. This very nearly destroyed those Marines coming ashore there and was made into a famous Clint Eastwood Movie. With Okinawa clearly in sight many began to plan for "Operation Olympic" the seizing by force of the Japanese Home Islands in what would have been if it happened easy the biggest military operation in Human History. The US Navy at this time was upwards North of an incredible 2000 Ships though everyone of those ships would have been needed for trying to take Japan by force as no one new about the Atomic Bomb then let alone whether "the gadget" would even function as intended. Without having the massive anchorage off of Luzon trying to prepare for such an action would have been impossible. With that Anchorage and the massive Army and Army Air Force Base still fully operational and doing Battle with the Japanese on the outer islands and any surface ships running about plus Germany wholly and completely destroyed the size of this Military was truly mind blowing. Intersting Battle between the US Navy and US Army over how Operation Olympic was to play out so worth a google search that one specifically so too. After Japan surrendered it was discovered the Japanese defenses were far more well prepared and manned than intelligence estimates had stated. Good thing those nukes and nuclear threats worked. Still...to have seen the entire US Fleet deployed for Battle against Japan plus with Australia plus with the Royal Navy plus presumably with Filipinos would have been the most awesome sight of Battle to be witnessed in Human History. As it was a truly incredible though not "fighting" sight would be seen at the Japanese surrender upon Tokyo Bay. I think 800 ships lay at anchor there and a flyover so massive of Tokyo it blotted out the Sun. Never before or since then has a military force such as that existed as happened upon the Surrender Ceremony Tokyo Bay. The only matter even barely the idea but at least the thought is what counts was when Iraq surrendered after Gulf War 1, 1991.

  • @markthomas6436
    @markthomas6436 4 місяці тому +1

    Excellent, clear enunciation by the narrator. Glad to hear an American, instead of the ubiquitous British accent. 😊

  • @kena2224
    @kena2224 5 місяців тому +1

    Too bad they do not have a museum like they do for the South Dakata.

  • @mysticdragonwolf89
    @mysticdragonwolf89 5 місяців тому +2

    Task Force 38.3
    I’m floored that there was a task force with a decimal

  • @LeeBrasher
    @LeeBrasher 3 місяці тому

    A beautiful ship unmarred by Iowa's Jimmy Durante bow.

  • @BigUnitBeef
    @BigUnitBeef 5 місяців тому +3

    One wonders. When those yard birds cut into her, did she not bleed? 😢

    • @billsmith5076
      @billsmith5076 5 місяців тому +1

      From the book "battleship at war".The story of her life.

  • @pierredecine1936
    @pierredecine1936 5 місяців тому +3

    The Japanese NEVER had a Torpedo called the Long Lance ! The name was invented after WWII .The term “Long Lance” was coined by U.S. Navy historian Rear Admiral Samuel Eliot Morison after World War II, so was not used during the war.

    • @GeorgiaBoy1961
      @GeorgiaBoy1961 5 місяців тому +2

      @pierredecine1936 - That's correct. The so-called "Long Lance" oxygen-driven torpedo was one of Japan's most-closely guarded military secrets prior to the war, and likewise the naval tactics and doctrine developed to exploit this superb design were developed in utmost secrecy. If that story interests you, consider reading "Japanese Destroyer Captain," by Captain Tameichi Hara (formerly of the Imperial Japanese Navy) and Fred Saito. Hara was one of the chief developers of torpedo tactics for the IJN and had a front-row seat throughout its development and combat use to devastating effect in the Pacific War. Excellent book and very even-handed in its treatment.

    • @pierredecine1936
      @pierredecine1936 4 місяці тому +1

      saying "Long Lance in a WWII Video is a very common mistake & yes, I have read about it - ungodly range & high speed torpedo - The US said " They cannot have a torp with those specs "@@GeorgiaBoy1961

    • @GeorgiaBoy1961
      @GeorgiaBoy1961 4 місяці тому

      @@pierredecine1936 - Re: "'The US said " They cannot have a torp with those specs '" But the Japanese did, didn't they? There is a modern-day analog to that underestimation of an adversary. I am speaking of the putdowns of the Japanese auto industry by U.S. manufacturers, and some European ones, too, back in the 1960s when Honda et al. began producing economy cars.
      I am old-enough to remember the derision, the condescension, the Big Three auto execs saying "It'll never sell" etc. That was around 1970 or so. But a few short years later, after the Arab oil embargo and the first gas shortages, those guys were singing a different tune while the Japanese cleaned their clocks in the marketplace.
      I suppose the point is that whether it is business, warfare, or something else, it is always a bad idea to underestimate a competitor or adversary. The arrogant and smug admirals of the pre-war U.S. Navy assumed that no one had the ability to produce weapons as good or better than our own.
      The scandal of how utterly horrible our torpedoes were, was largely hidden by the navy until around mid-war, as by then, the story had leaked at least somewhat. But it wasn't until after the war when the relevant files were declassified that the true extent of the navy's incompetence and neglect became known.
      If it wasn't for bold and courageous officers of integrity such as (later Vice-Admiral) Charles "Swede" Momsen, who helped unravel the technical problems at the heart of the issue, the navy might not have had decent torpedoes at all during the war.

  • @Kyfordman1989
    @Kyfordman1989 5 місяців тому +5

    The navy has no respect for its veteran ships. You could have 10 ships in the same class. Each one will be different behave differently have their own personality. A ship gets the same metals, the same awards that the crew gets. A ship provides a home provide shelter for its crew. It’s just sad that sell the world’s greatest ships the U.S. Navy’s ever had they cut up and scrapped.

    • @Tsyroc
      @Tsyroc 5 місяців тому +2

      I've heard/seen some rumors of renaming the Carl Vinson (CVN-70) and John C. Stennis (CVN-74) to Yorktown and Saratoga. Both of which I support unless they are willing name a new Ford Class with those names. FYI: I was crewmember on the USS Saratoga (CV-60). So I might be a bit biased.
      While I admire Doris Miller he has had a ship named after him since WWII I think it would be better to name an another surface combatant after him. That being said, I won't be especially butt hurt if someone as courageous as Doris Miller has an major capital ship named after him. I tend to be annoyed by the political aspects of capital ship naming. Wasp, Hornet, Saratoga should all be reserved for the ultimate US capital ships. At least the US carriers named after presidents have tended to be either been former USN or at least very supportive of the USN.

    • @tonymanero5544
      @tonymanero5544 5 місяців тому +2

      @@TsyrocLook, naming has been politicized as a tit_for-tat. It’s kind of started with FDR and JFK. Forrestal was a either Navy or Sec Defense so he’s one of the military guys. Then Congress and Pentagon jumped in with Vinson and Stennis as those I think Senators were strong Navy advocates. The Republicans retaliated by flag waving with Reagan and Bush, Ford which I think was bad precedent as they were living persons. The Repubs disrespected Carter with just a sub name even though he was Annapolis while Reagan was in a “training role” the armed forces. The Dems counterpunched with Doris Miller as a Black serviceman. That’s where we are.

    • @Tsyroc
      @Tsyroc 5 місяців тому

      @@tonymanero5544 I don't mind Ford and H.W. Bush because they were both Navy. So was JFK. I've come around to not minding Carter having the Seawolf sub the SEALS operate from named after him. He was a nuclear sub officer when he was in the Navy. The person who really was screwed over in the ship naming department was Hyman Rickover. He definitely should have had a carrier named after him. Unfortunately he pissed off the Washington types one time to many. I do think that Enterprise, Hornet, Yorktown and Saratoga should always be at the top of the carrier naming list, and especially before politicians.

  • @kamaeq
    @kamaeq 3 місяці тому

    The North Carolina and Washington wouldn't be reactivated because of their teething issues, but their armor plate help develop weaponry for decades later.

  • @seventhson27
    @seventhson27 4 місяці тому

    "This is Ching Lee. Stand aside, I'm coming through."

  • @seventhson27
    @seventhson27 4 місяці тому

    Washington vs Tripitz would have been an interesting fight, but Tripitz refused to come out and play.

  • @BradFalck-mn3pc
    @BradFalck-mn3pc 4 місяці тому +1

    I'm surprised that it wasn't called the USS Washington state